So what is "collusion"?
What makes a criminal conspiracy?
Let's start with the basic premise that collusion or criminal conspiracy would not be investigated or proven any differently whether that accused collusion was between two Parties who both were American citizens or two Parties of different nationalities.
For some reason I think this is what confuses most liberals. They seem to quite honestly believe that the entire country of Russia (all 150 million) was in on the scam. Or at least that is how their mind works. On top of that, they are willing to toss in pretty much anyone loosely associated with Russia and are more than willing to treat someone from say Ukraine, as if they are actually Russian.
But the reality is that to prove collusion you have to prove a link between the people who actually committed a crime, and those you believe were in cahoots. In the case of the Mueller Russian Election interference probe, those people who committed the interference were limited to two distinct groups.
- The Russian Hackers (Guccifer 2.0)
- The Russian social media "troll farm"
So in very simple terms. If you believe that Trump "colluded" in regards to election interference, you must connect Donald Trump (or people associated to him) to either Guccifer 2.0 or to the Troll farm. Paul Manafort (for instance) providing polling data to a Ukrainian associate literally does "nothing" to connect Trump to either. It's in fact nothing more than red herring.
To make a simple analogy. Let's say you wanted to prove that Trump was associated with a Mob syndicate located in Chicago. Would law enforcement attempt to investigate every person loosely associated with Trump who might have talked to anyone who is from Chicago?
The obvious answer to that would be of course not. It would be ridiculous to believe that everyone who lives in Chicago must have some affiliation with a mob syndicate based out of the same city. The baseline assumption would be that 99.999% of people from Chicago would have nothing to do with the Mob syndicate.
But with the delusional paranoid fantastical confirmation bias of the left, they quite literally believed that everyone with a loose affiliation with Russia must be in association with someone who was responsible for election interference. Reality is that Americans are legally able to talk to as many Russians as they would like, and those conversations do not make them in danger of being arrested.
More to the obvious point. When Mueller indicted pretty much any and all known members of the "troll farm" he made it a point to put into the indictment that this work was done without the aid or knowledge of any Americans. To the degree that any Americans were involved, it was unwittingly.
This should have closed the door on possible collusion between the "troll farm" and Trump associates. It did for most of us. It just didn't for those with TDS who used a high degree of cognitive dissonance to ignore the most important finding of the indictment.
When it came to the Russian Hackers, our Law Enforcement has always been relying on the "word" of the DNC and Hillary Camps, who hired an outside source to investigate the hacking. Quite literally neither the FBI or the Mueller Special Counsel ever examined the servers to verify. Without the literal evidence of the servers, any charges against the hackers would never stick (even if they decided to come into America and willingly face charges).
If you can't make criminal charges stick to the people you believe committed the crime. You cannot possibly convict anyone of "conspiracy" or "aiding and abetting" that particular crime.
Now on top of all of this, this is not a Kevin Bacon game of seven degrees of separation. Just being able to say someone knows someone who knows someone who knows someone who commited a crime does not implicate anyone other than the criminal. If there is conspiracy, the conspiracy would quite literally have to involve every player along the way.
For instance, the Russian attorney lobbyist who came to the Trump Tower for that famous meeting, was at least four or five degrees of separation to Putin. Oh, and guess what, you would still need to conclusively tie Putin to either the Hackers or the Trolling Farm. Prosecutors don't get to simply allow "assumptions" to be considered fact in a court of law. So that puts her at least another degree of separation from the people who actually committed the criminal act.
Well guess what. Being five degrees of separation from someone who committed a crime would not make you part of a conspiracy. In the case of Natalia Veselnitskaya, you would have to believe that her firm was in on the conspiracy, that the client in question was in on the conspiracy, and that he was working through his dad, who then worked his way up the government chain to Putin, who then worked his way back to the Hackers or Trolling Farm.
And you have to have actual real evidence that you can connect each and every dot.
So the reality is that Mueller was never going to find real criminal evidence of collusion. Heck, even if a real criminal conspiracy existed, it would be nearly impossible to prove it when the players are not part of this country. I am not exactly sure how people (who otherwise seemed reasonably intelligent) were so certain that he would. I would love to hear "exactly" what they thought the links actually were, and how they believed Mueller would be able to identify them.
Was it "really" because they are confused by the idea that it was Russia? Did they really truly believe that there were 150 million Russians all hiding their involvement in "stealing" an American election?