tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5548360050548401665.post341209155933848671..comments2024-01-02T04:15:58.292-06:00Comments on The Coldheartedtruth: Dems to rally around Comey!!! C.H. Truthhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07424696045921160961noreply@blogger.comBlogger75125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5548360050548401665.post-54040501224505700872017-05-11T08:40:28.297-05:002017-05-11T08:40:28.297-05:00Of course this firing was political, C.H. Of course this firing was political, C.H. Indy Voternoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5548360050548401665.post-5346126885988112722017-05-11T08:03:30.824-05:002017-05-11T08:03:30.824-05:00General Flynn was fired for lying to his boss.
A...<br />General Flynn was fired for lying to his boss. <br /><br />And refuses to turn over documents requested by the senate and are now subpoena'd. He also asked for immunity, which you think proves nothing. Yep, he sure is cooperating for weak minded sycophant like you. LOL!!opienoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5548360050548401665.post-57655673633913314862017-05-11T07:59:03.327-05:002017-05-11T07:59:03.327-05:00Just as I thought, trump bootlickers will be in ch...Just as I thought, trump bootlickers will be in charge of the investigation. Yeah, CH, the are lots of investigations being done, all by partisans, which is exactly what you want. Sad, the truth is your enemy CH. <br /><br />https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/politics/comey-fired-russia-investigation/?hpid=hp_no-name_graphic-story-b%3Ahomepage%2Fstory&utm_term=.57305bdf6ea7opienoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5548360050548401665.post-75323468066330172192017-05-11T07:48:45.920-05:002017-05-11T07:48:45.920-05:00Last time I checked Opie...
General Flynn was fir...Last time I checked Opie...<br /><br />General Flynn was fired for lying to his boss. <br /><br />I guess you still see him as "on the team" huh? <br /><br />And let's be clear. His attorney tried to strike a deal for his testimony, as any attorney would. Clinton aides all got immunity to testify and they got the FBI to agree to destroy evidence after it was handed over. <br /><br />What Flynn's attorneys were doing doesn't account to not cooperating. That is trying to agree to the terms of his cooperation. <br /><br />The Senate refused to make a deal and instead subpoenaed information. The lack of cooperation is on their side at this point.<br /><br />Now if Flynn happens to play a Clinton and lose all of the documentation that is being subpoenaed, then we are in the same boat as the Clinton cooperation. But if he turns it all over (as I am sure he will) then he will be far ahead of the Clintons. <br /><br />Until then, he has not obstructed or otherwise disobeyed anything. C.H. Truthhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07424696045921160961noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5548360050548401665.post-59474051196209521022017-05-11T07:45:28.303-05:002017-05-11T07:45:28.303-05:00I never even imagined it could get this fucking go...I never even imagined it could get this fucking good.<br /><br />A boatload more popcorn PLEAZE !!!<br /><br /><br />ROFLMFAO !!!cowardly king obamanoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5548360050548401665.post-16639902122144527302017-05-11T07:38:48.425-05:002017-05-11T07:38:48.425-05:00or that anyone else on his team has not cooperated...or that anyone else on his team has not cooperated. NONE WHAT-SO-EVER!!!<br /><br />Like flynn ignoring the senate request that is now under subpoena ?? Or the grand jury that is now involved. I guess that is cooperation in Minnesota and their frozen brains. opienoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5548360050548401665.post-81440463437051578762017-05-11T07:36:08.504-05:002017-05-11T07:36:08.504-05:00There are three investigations going on! Three of ...There are three investigations going on! Three of them!!! <br /><br />Which means what???? Too bad the bias of the R led investigations will never publish a single finding that may go against the donald unless the failed NYT's publishes it first. With Comey fired, now the FBI investigation is suspect. Your confidence in not knowing the truth is a sign of your weak minded buying all the crap that they say, especially the huckabee spawn who would say anything she is told to....a good little spokesman. opienoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5548360050548401665.post-51460788810901465472017-05-11T07:32:44.093-05:002017-05-11T07:32:44.093-05:00"Roger.
ARE YOU REALLY THIS STUPID!?!?!?!&q..."Roger. <br /><br />ARE YOU REALLY THIS STUPID!?!?!?!"<br /><br />YES HE IS!!!!!Loretta https://www.blogger.com/profile/03888424844344384091noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5548360050548401665.post-41722626414302038602017-05-11T07:16:11.103-05:002017-05-11T07:16:11.103-05:00Roger.
ARE YOU REALLY THIS STUPID!?!?!?!
There...Roger. <br /><br />ARE YOU REALLY THIS STUPID!?!?!?!<br /><br /><br />There are three investigations going on! Three of them!!! The same exact investigations that were taking place over the Clinton Email situation.<br /><br />Three investigations Roger!! <br /><br />Three investigations...<br /><br />DO YOU UNDERSTAND THAT THERE ARE ALREADY THREE INVESTIGATIONS...<br /><br /><br />There is absolutely no evidence that Trump has not cooperated fully or that anyone else on his team has not cooperated. NONE WHAT-SO-EVER!!!<br /><br />Since we have had and currently have three investigations and they have been going on for several months... and none of those investigations (in spite of full cooperation) has yielded anything... tell me why we need a fourth?<br /><br />You act as if it's not being investigated. WHY? Are you stupid?C.H. Truthhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07424696045921160961noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5548360050548401665.post-8355357810698522812017-05-11T07:12:50.062-05:002017-05-11T07:12:50.062-05:00Why is Donald Trump afraid of an investigation int...<b>Why is Donald Trump afraid of an investigation into the charges of cooperating with the charges of cooperation with the Russians to influence the election?</b><br /><br />Oh I don't think Donald Trump is afraid or "fucking scared" of an investigation. <br /><br />I can see however, how he can be impatient with the progress of the investigation. <br /><br />It's been 10 months and the FBI has not uncovered any evidence of a crime occurring much less any wrongdoing by Trump's campaign associates. <br /><br />This despite their access to all the (extra-constitutional) wiretapped conversations and communications between Trump associates and Russian nationals. <br /><br />Right now it's an investigation in search of a crime. If this was a normal investigation that was similarly fruitless, it would have been closed. <br /><br />And since the investigation was made public (illegally leaked), there should be a statement outlining their final findings. Commonsensehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01611062965687173944noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5548360050548401665.post-47624273092825222942017-05-11T07:06:12.842-05:002017-05-11T07:06:12.842-05:00Anonymous Caliphate4vr said...
Aetna exiting all A...Anonymous Caliphate4vr said...<br />Aetna exiting all ACA insurance marketplaces in 2018<br /><br />Which is great news for those using their insurance and no sign of a R plan. Brilliant, pauline. Keep cheering. opienoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5548360050548401665.post-30019263988146507262017-05-11T07:04:18.054-05:002017-05-11T07:04:18.054-05:00It would then seem logical that Rosenstein would h...It would then seem logical that Rosenstein would have reviewed his direct reports (including Comey). So in this regard, the timing seems perfectly normal. <br /><br />Only to bootlickers like you and the rest of the sycophants here. In that regard, you now believe the BS spewing from the DC swamp, hook line and sinker. Trump led the charge, the rest is pure lies. Nicely done, CH. opienoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5548360050548401665.post-55695160333864324752017-05-11T06:45:14.674-05:002017-05-11T06:45:14.674-05:00Blogger Commonsense said...
Bit of advice Roger.
...Blogger Commonsense said...<br />Bit of advice Roger.<br /><br />Use Reynolds wrap to make your hat. The generic tin foil brands just don't cut it.<br />__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________<br /><br /><br />oh he's waaaaaaaaaaay past that.<br /><br />ol' rog needs some aircraft-grade aluminum like a fender off a new ford truck to protect his skull these days.<br /><br />a mental health professional lurking these pages would want to have him committed to a small room with rubber wallpaper.<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5548360050548401665.post-15142142604876502112017-05-11T06:42:33.856-05:002017-05-11T06:42:33.856-05:00Democrats and liberals cannot seem to stop mischar...Democrats and liberals cannot seem to stop mischaracterizing what is actually being investigated. The New York Times editorial perfectly captures the irresponsible hyperventilating: “Mr. Comey was fired because he was leading an active investigation that could bring down a president.” The Times links to its own report of Comey’s testimony in March confirming the existence of an FBI probe – but this does not remotely prove what the Times wants its readers to believe. Josh Marshall, characteristically, gets even more overheated, claiming that “the FBI is investigating the President and his top associates for colluding with a foreign power to subvert a US election” and that “[t]here is only one reasonable conclusion that can be drawn from the decision to fire Comey: that there is grave wrongdoing at the center of the Russia scandal and that it implicates the President.”<br /><br />If you look at the available facts, instead of wild speculation, this is nonsense. As I detailed at length at the time, there is no such investigation: Comey’s own testimony in March demonstrated that he was pursuing a counterintelligence investigation, aimed at Russia – not a criminal investigation of Trump. That makes all the difference in how such an investigation would proceed (it is likely to be conducted in secret, without any endpoint, and without the goal of indicting anyone) as well as what inferences we should draw from its existence (counterintelligence probes don’t require anything resembling probable cause to believe that any American has committed a crime). Of course, such investigations sometimes spin off criminal investigations; it appears that the FBI is handing out subpoenas to business associates of deposed National Security Advisor Michael Flynn, after revelations of the extent to which he was on the payroll of Russian interests before the election, and Flynn as well as others like Carter Page or Paul Manafort may potentially face legal jeopardy for failure to comply with foreign-lobbyist-disclosure requirements and other disclosure and ethics rules. But while that would be embarrassing to Trump, it’s a very long way away from the sort of thing that “could bring down a president.”<br /><br />In political terms, the problem for Republicans is that as long as the investigation is secret, Democrats can continue to make it look worse than it is. They have a license to spin conspiracy theories like Marshall’s, without the need for any facts or evidence; they can just say “the FBI is investigating this,” knowing full well that’s not what the FBI is doing but that the FBI won’t say so. That seems to be precisely what ate at Trump, who went out of his way to say in his letter firing Comey that “I greatly appreciate you informing me, on three separate occasions, that I am not under investigation,” and Politico reported that <br /><br />"He had grown enraged by the Russia investigation, two advisers said, frustrated by his inability to control the mushrooming narrative around Russia. He repeatedly asked aides why the Russia investigation wouldn’t disappear and demanded they speak out for him. He would sometimes scream at television clips about the probe, one adviser said."<br /><br />[...]<br /><br />Follow the facts, and make them public, and the politics will take care of itself.<br /><br /><br /><br />Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/447497/republicans-should-want-truth-about-russia-and-2016-publicAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5548360050548401665.post-76183383534707619572017-05-11T06:36:11.281-05:002017-05-11T06:36:11.281-05:00Bit of advice Roger.
Use Reynolds wrap to make yo...Bit of advice Roger.<br /><br />Use Reynolds wrap to make your hat. The generic tin foil brands just don't cut it. Commonsensehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01611062965687173944noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5548360050548401665.post-59425165395723816132017-05-11T06:21:48.178-05:002017-05-11T06:21:48.178-05:00Aetna exiting all ACA insurance marketplaces in 20...<a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/aetna-exiting-all-aca-insurance-marketplaces-in-2018/2017/05/10/9dedbeea-35d4-11e7-b373-418f6849a004_story.html?utm_term=.1d58a2451b50" rel="nofollow">Aetna exiting all ACA insurance marketplaces in 2018</a>Caliphate4vrnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5548360050548401665.post-53079445243184305102017-05-11T06:21:20.959-05:002017-05-11T06:21:20.959-05:00in other news from the "unexpectedly" fi...<br /><br /><br />in other news from the "unexpectedly" files:<br /><br />Aetna exiting all ACA insurance marketplaces in 2018<br /><br />Aetna will complete its withdrawal from Affordable Care Act insurance exchanges for 2018, announcing on Wednesday that lingering financial losses and uncertainty about the marketplaces’ future was prompting it to exit two final states.<br /><br /><br />https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/aetna-exiting-all-aca-insurance-marketplaces-in-2018/2017/05/10/9dedbeea-35d4-11e7-b373-418f6849a004_story.html?utm_term=.313816d3d387Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5548360050548401665.post-24226151576083802192017-05-11T05:47:15.912-05:002017-05-11T05:47:15.912-05:00Washington (CNN)House Democratic leader Nancy Pelo...<br /><br />Washington (CNN)House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi said Wednesday that FBI Director James Comey is perhaps "not in the right job" given how he has handled the investigation into Hillary Clinton's email use.<br /><br />Pelosi declined to say in an interview with CNN's Jamie Gangel that Comey should resign or be removed, but did not rule it out in the future.<br /><br />"Maybe he's not in the right job," Pelosi said. "I think that we have to just get through this election and just see what the casualties are along the way."<br /><br />http://www.cnn.com/2016/11/02/politics/nancy-pelosi-james-comey-anthony-weiner/index.htmlAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5548360050548401665.post-28623042749155916062017-05-11T05:44:57.629-05:002017-05-11T05:44:57.629-05:00The 10 Most Bizarre FBI Scandals Under James Comey...<br /><br />The 10 Most Bizarre FBI Scandals Under James Comey’s Watch<br /><br />The FBI interviewed almost every terrorist who successfully struck America<br /><br />http://directorblue.blogspot.com/2017/05/the-10-most-bizarre-fbi-scandals-under.html#more<br /><br /><br />impressive list. all "allowing unrestricted access to the people and data", and the FBI STILL fucked it all up. i guess they needed more time than "a year or more."<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5548360050548401665.post-48691722934135285692017-05-11T05:16:33.673-05:002017-05-11T05:16:33.673-05:00IF the President gave the investigators unhinged a... IF the President gave the investigators unhinged access.<br />_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________<br /><br />nice freudian slip. LOL.<br /><br /><br /><br />"The duration on an investigation of this type could run for a year or more, IF the President gave the investigators unhinged access. He will not do that, and you just keep dodging and weaving. Get back to me when you can show me that he's allowing unrestricted access to the people and data."<br /><br /><br />ok rog, how about this - <br /><br />there was a robbery committed several miles from here a few nights ago. <br /><br />i happen to believe that it's quite possible that YOU were involved. now then, i have no evidence, but i would like unfettered access to you, all your friends, family, drunk poker chip loser club compadres, and any other known associates. remember, i have no evidence. zero fucking evidence. but the fact remains that i am absolutely fucking convinced to the point of mentally ill obsession that YOU ARE IN FACT involved in this crime. i'm going to need to fuck with you and turn what's left of your life upside down for oh, i don't know, about a year or more.<br /><br />what do you say? you won't mind, will you?<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5548360050548401665.post-27205112991009139792017-05-11T05:05:41.916-05:002017-05-11T05:05:41.916-05:00alky,
your TDS is is stage 11, and while before i...<br /><br /><br />alky,<br /><br />your TDS is is stage 11, and while before it simply had you enraged at the level of a low boil, you have now reached the point of full-on, tin foil hat, searing, blinding insanity.<br /><br />and it's not just you. i've been watching MSDNC the past couple of nights. you have PLENTY of company in the seething rage and insanity club.<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5548360050548401665.post-33926414932030476102017-05-11T02:41:28.115-05:002017-05-11T02:41:28.115-05:00Nice attempt to dodge the question. If there was n...Nice attempt to dodge the question. If there was nothing to be discovered, Trump could say, 'go for it". But he didn't ad in an angry outburst he fired him The one and only reason for firing Comey, is to hide the truth.<br /><br /> The duration on an investigation of this type could run for a year or more, IF the President gave the investigators unhinged access. He will not do that, and you just keep dodging and weaving. Get back to me when you can show me that he's allowing unrestricted access to the people and data. Coldheartedtruth Tellerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10441230118917524072noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5548360050548401665.post-2763293836895477462017-05-11T02:29:03.037-05:002017-05-11T02:29:03.037-05:00Some "Fake News" check on the Dems Rally...Some "Fake News" check on the Dems Rally Around Comey. <br />https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/10/us/politics/fact-check-fbi-james-comey-sarah-huckabee-sanders.html?rref=collection%2Fnewseventcollection%2FThe%20Trump%20White%20House&action=click&contentCollection=Politics&module=Collection&region=Marginalia&src=me&version=newsevent&pgtype=article<br /><br />The White House, and it's reliable Minnesota hack.. err cold hearted hack in its efforts to defend the firing of the F.B.I. director, James B. Comey, has alleged Democratic hypocrisy over the decision and cited a letter from Deputy Attorney General Rod J. Rosenstein to justify it.<br /><br />Follow the link. It's clear that the allegations are misleading or false. Coldheartedtruth Tellerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10441230118917524072noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5548360050548401665.post-71910803189458705292017-05-10T22:24:30.397-05:002017-05-10T22:24:30.397-05:00Comey was concerned by information showing possibl...<b>Comey was concerned by information showing possible evidence of collusion</b><br /><br />Either there is evidence, or there is not.<br /><br />There is no such thing as "possible evidence". <br /><br />If these were real sources with real information that "possible evidence" existed... then we would all know what that "possible evidence" actually was.<br /><br />C.H. Truthhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07424696045921160961noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5548360050548401665.post-16166287250299612912017-05-10T22:18:55.013-05:002017-05-10T22:18:55.013-05:00Roger - there is an FBI investigation, a House inv...Roger - there is an FBI investigation, a House investigation, and a Senate investigation. This is exactly the same sets of investigations that covered the Clinton Email fiasco. <br /><br />The Clinton FBI investigation started in July of 2015 and Comey made his announcement that there would be no charges in July of 2016. That was one full year... <br /><br />According to the FBI, they have been investigating the Russian hacking and any possible collusion by any Parties since July of last year... that's only two months short of the Clinton investigation...<br /><br />and still neither the FBI or any of the Congressional investigations have found any evidence of collusion between the Russians and Trump. <br /><br />How long should an investigation go on for, before you throw in the towel and admit that there is no "there" there? <br /><br /><br />I will ask you this, Roger... is this "still" American, where you are considered innocent until proven guilty, and where the fourth amendment protects people from unwarranted searches, seizures, etc... without the due process of authorities providing probable cause?<br /><br />Come talk to me when Trump has his server subpoenaed and refuses to turn it over and has a third Party wipe it clean before the FBI actually physically seizes it. <br /><br />Come talk to me when Trump associates all cut immunity deals for their testimony... while the Justice department approves one attorney representing everyone. <br /><br />Until then, the fact that there is no evidence IS the overriding factor. There can be very limited investigations without probable cause (which requires evidence). <br /><br />At the end of the day, you want a "possibility" investigated ENTIRELY for political reasons. You are willing to ignore constitutional rights to get there. C.H. Truthhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07424696045921160961noreply@blogger.com