tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5548360050548401665.post3943586831549017109..comments2024-01-02T04:15:58.292-06:00Comments on The Coldheartedtruth: Politico confuses media spin with reality... C.H. Truthhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07424696045921160961noreply@blogger.comBlogger74125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5548360050548401665.post-76972917628534303902017-06-01T07:16:01.953-05:002017-06-01T07:16:01.953-05:00CH thinks lying is OK said
You being the expert o...CH thinks lying is OK said<br /><br />You being the expert on everything thinks just not filling the form out is fine. Do you realize that the loss of a security clearance for an engineer in the defense field results in that engineer from making a living?? Your naiveté is astounding and your simplistic either or is indicative of a low information voter. You said no one was prosecuted, CH. I proved other wise and showed you to be full of shit. Normal for you. He got caught lying on the SF 86. FU and your stupid spin. opienoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5548360050548401665.post-60117842204786944152017-05-31T18:56:29.273-05:002017-05-31T18:56:29.273-05:00Sure Opie...
That guy was joining the military, ...Sure Opie... <br /><br />That guy was joining the military, didn't disclose that he was employed by the government of Ghana, lied to investigator under oath about it, and was charged with Social Security fraud. <br /><br />He didn't just fill out a form incorrectly. <br /><br />Good try though...<br /><br />C.H. Truthhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07424696045921160961noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5548360050548401665.post-35876942281884517412017-05-31T18:52:47.586-05:002017-05-31T18:52:47.586-05:00On Thursday, a federal grand jury charged Simmons ...On Thursday, a federal grand jury charged Simmons with lying on his Standard Form 86, the 127-page-long form for federal security clearances, which contains highly personal information about the individual, including possible drug and alcohol abuses, and financial and criminal histories. The Office of Personnel Management database containing millions of SF-86 files was stolen when the agency was hacked at the end of last year. Simmons was applying to work with the US State Department, and wrote that he had been employed as an “Outside Paramilitary Special Operations Officer” for the CIA from 1973 to 2000.opienoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5548360050548401665.post-3977013112587468122017-05-31T18:46:38.916-05:002017-05-31T18:46:38.916-05:00only "fire" the FBI director, but accord...only "fire" the FBI director, but according to legal experts (like Alan Dershowitz) the President has actually has the constitutional authority to actually order an FBI director to start or end an investigation.<br /><br />WTF does that have to do with comey testifying other than for you to try and obfuscate a piss poor argument??? How do you spell obstruction. Make up another phony straw man. opienoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5548360050548401665.post-31827586991575464772017-05-31T18:44:08.561-05:002017-05-31T18:44:08.561-05:00nobody has ever been charged with any crimes regar...nobody has ever been charged with any crimes regarding the security form<br /><br />Really CH.. Where in your vast background of security did you find that. He lied on the SF 86 and at a minimum should lose his clearance which happens with frequency. <br /><br /> A La Vista man was indicted last week by a federal grand jury on charges of lying ... submitted a Form SF-86, ...<br /><br />FU CH http://www.omaha.com/sarpy/papillion/man-accused-of-lying-on-security-clearance-form/article_684e3b65-fa32-531c-accf-b4953630e160.html<br /><br />Gee, that took long to find. Being the lazy denier you are, you again chose to make up what fit your bias. Again, you were proven to be full of it. LOLOLOLopienoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5548360050548401665.post-6997640282916580032017-05-31T18:38:45.705-05:002017-05-31T18:38:45.705-05:00Well Opie...
Too bad that the President can not o...Well Opie...<br /><br />Too bad that the President can not only "fire" the FBI director, but according to legal experts (like Alan Dershowitz) the President has actually has the constitutional authority to actually order an FBI director to start or end an investigation. <br /><br />Sort of like the A.G. has a constitutional right to direct the FBI not to question Hillary Clinton under oath and can cut deals to provide criminal immunity to people who the FBI saw as targets (without garnering anything in return for the immunity).<br /><br />But then again... Alan Dershowitz might be wrong. I am sure you know better than he does. You have no faith in the "experts" to understand their fields.<br /> C.H. Truthhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07424696045921160961noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5548360050548401665.post-57564342169902731212017-05-31T18:29:27.435-05:002017-05-31T18:29:27.435-05:00Opie - nobody has ever been charged with any crime...Opie - nobody has ever been charged with any crimes regarding the security form... and likely nobody ever will. It's like the "Logan act" that has never once been prosecuted. <br /><br />They call it a "desuetude' law... <br /><br />C.H. Truthhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07424696045921160961noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5548360050548401665.post-88463035163899548072017-05-31T18:05:17.931-05:002017-05-31T18:05:17.931-05:00Comey cleared to talk.....Going to get ugly real f...Comey cleared to talk.....Going to get ugly real fast especially when he tells congress trump did more than suggest going easy on flynn....How do you spell obstruction, CH??? Him having notes is going to help him. Wonder where the tapes are?????? opienoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5548360050548401665.post-27523304274763216762017-05-31T17:51:59.650-05:002017-05-31T17:51:59.650-05:00First of all CH it is an SF 86 (Standard Form) Se...First of all CH it is an SF 86 (Standard Form) Secondly the missing data on the form is his albatross ...Saying I forgot ain't gonna make it. I've been promoting that now for weeks, and you finally figured it out. Not bad, CH for a great thinker like yourself. opienoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5548360050548401665.post-89172340311258983702017-05-31T17:27:30.173-05:002017-05-31T17:27:30.173-05:00WP...
According to "sources" who are &q...WP...<br /><br />According to "sources" who are "leaking"... the FBI wants to discuss the meeting with the Russian ambassador regarding back channel communications as well as ask him about phone calls that he allegedly didn't disclose on his security clearance form 86.<br /><br />C.H. Truthhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07424696045921160961noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5548360050548401665.post-23283675321576384492017-05-31T17:16:58.659-05:002017-05-31T17:16:58.659-05:00BREAKING NEWS
Yep, 7 sopenas have been issued.......BREAKING NEWS<br /><br />Yep, 7 sopenas have been issued.... 3 are for the UNMASKING OF US CITIZENS BY ,,,,, wait for it,,, yep OBIMBO.KD, Love it, you wanted an Investigationnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5548360050548401665.post-27311987637954256772017-05-31T16:22:11.751-05:002017-05-31T16:22:11.751-05:00“any links and/or coordination between the Russian...“any links and/or coordination between the Russian government and individuals associated with the campaign of President Donald Trump”. <br /><br />Those are Mueller's marching orders. So that doesn't include anyone in Trump's Administration, in your opinion?wphamiltonnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5548360050548401665.post-91047172961896561572017-05-31T16:18:20.027-05:002017-05-31T16:18:20.027-05:00Your assumption is that Kushner was "acting o...<b>Your assumption is that Kushner was "acting on behalf of other figures" which I am not even sure exactly what that means. </b><br /><br />OK, why else would the FBI want what he knows, if he isn't a target of the investigation. Investigating no one?wphamiltonnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5548360050548401665.post-57119588245472663152017-05-31T16:14:32.979-05:002017-05-31T16:14:32.979-05:00You don't actually believe that do you?
Yes. ...<b>You don't actually believe that do you?</b><br /><br />Yes. I actually believe that. Why wouldn't I? <br /><br />Just consider how many leaks have been put out there with the obvious intention to cause political harm to the President... you don't seriously believe that if someone within the Administration was an actual target that we wouldn't know. That it wouldn't be leaked. If there was real evidence of anything... you think it wouldn't be leaked? <br /><br />Again... WP. REALITY. Everyone who has been asked under oath has stated there is no evidence of collusion. Even Democrats in position to have been briefed on the subject state the same thing. <br /><br />There are not even leaks that suggest that there is any evidence of collusion.<br /><br />Occam's Razor suggests we go with the explanation that has the least amount of assumptions. You should assume that what we know is true. That there is no evidence of collusion. Therefor nobody in the White House is a target. <br />C.H. Truthhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07424696045921160961noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5548360050548401665.post-37408110578089808162017-05-31T16:08:04.490-05:002017-05-31T16:08:04.490-05:00Your assumption is that Kushner was "acting o...Your assumption is that Kushner was "acting on behalf of other figures" which I am not even sure exactly what that means. <br /><br />The sources indicate that the FBI wants to talk to him about a couple of contacts (between April and November) that was left off his form 86. <br /><br />There is nothing (even within the leaked sources) that suggests that this has anything to do with the FBI "leaning on him" to get him to give up the goods on someone else. But that would seem to be your implication by the assertion that he suddenly has leverage because he is talking to the FBI.<br /><br />That also suggests that you are assuming someone has something to hide.<br /><br />Again... from all sources, the FBI is not targeting anyone within the Administration. Considering there has been zero evidence of any specific wrong doing by anyone in the Administration... the explanation with the least amount of assumptions is that nobody (especially within the administration) would have anything to hide. <br /><br />Not the other way around.<br /><br />But I have a feeling that you have a general problem with making any assumptions of innocence in this case. <br /><br />C.H. Truthhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07424696045921160961noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5548360050548401665.post-11476812069397671942017-05-31T16:03:35.966-05:002017-05-31T16:03:35.966-05:00Nobody in the Administration is a target.
You don...<b>Nobody in the Administration is a target.</b><br /><br />You don't actually believe that do you?<br /><br />Or do you mean that any investigations of the Administration have moved to Mueller's bailiwick?wphamiltonnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5548360050548401665.post-23224748233342224082017-05-31T16:00:17.344-05:002017-05-31T16:00:17.344-05:00Oh for crying out loud...
You know better than th...<b>Oh for crying out loud...</b><br /><br />You know better than that, using answers from only half the sample.<br /><br />Half of the people saying "Yes" disassociated impeachment from an offense. It's reasonable that some, perhaps half, of the people saying "No" would also disassociate impeachment from an offense.<br /><br />It's not reasonable to summarily conclude as you did, with no objective justification, that all of those answering "No" would have said "Impeach Trump" if they believed that he was guilty.wphamiltonnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5548360050548401665.post-12841154208987081402017-05-31T15:54:22.712-05:002017-05-31T15:54:22.712-05:00From what we know Kushner is "not" a tar...<b>From what we know Kushner is "not" a target of any investigation and the "sources" are saying it has to do with a couple of phone calls that he left off his form 86... which he has stated he doesn't remember. <br /><br />My explanation assumes only what we know. Kushner is not a target. Nobody in the Administration is a target. Kushner has gotten the FBI request. Kushner has a law degree and a team of attorneys. Kushner has agreed to cooperate and does not appear concerned.<br /><br />You explanations includes a whole boatload of assumptions that are completely without substantiation.</b><br /><br />Didn't I say that I thought Kushner was NOT the target, but the FBI wanted information from him? Where is my unsubstantiated assumption, when you're basically agreeing with me???wphamiltonnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5548360050548401665.post-28294023103263985442017-05-31T15:53:34.138-05:002017-05-31T15:53:34.138-05:00A question to the Feckless Five
Are you going to...A question to the Feckless Five<br /><br /><br />Are you going to be mad , EVERY day Trump is in office?<br /><br />Because since Nov. 9th , 2016 to today you have been.KDnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5548360050548401665.post-68105483257458665052017-05-31T15:48:11.340-05:002017-05-31T15:48:11.340-05:00CH, the point being that the poll did NOT ask thos...<b>CH, the point being that the poll did NOT ask those who did NOT want to impeach Trump whether or not he was guilty of an impeachable offense. </b><br /><br />Oh for crying out loud... C.H. Truthhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07424696045921160961noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5548360050548401665.post-44800222369915538082017-05-31T15:40:56.051-05:002017-05-31T15:40:56.051-05:00WP...
Occam's razor... The explanation with t...WP...<br /><br />Occam's razor... The explanation with the least amount of assumptions is generally the correct one. <br /><br />From what we know Kushner is "not" a target of any investigation and the "sources" are saying it has to do with a couple of phone calls that he left off his form 86... which he has stated he doesn't remember. <br /><br />My explanation assumes only what we know. Kushner is not a target. Nobody in the Administration is a target. Kushner has gotten the FBI request. Kushner has a law degree and a team of attorneys. Kushner has agreed to cooperate and does not appear concerned.<br /><br />You explanations includes a whole boatload of assumptions that are completely without substantiation. C.H. Truthhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07424696045921160961noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5548360050548401665.post-32064312661275174532017-05-31T15:29:24.444-05:002017-05-31T15:29:24.444-05:00CH, the point being that the poll did NOT ask thos...CH, the point being that the poll did NOT ask those who did NOT want to impeach Trump whether or not he was guilty of an impeachable offense. Your simple math leaves out a segment of possible answers. Therefore incorrect conclusion.wphamiltonnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5548360050548401665.post-91368653424104430222017-05-31T15:27:18.217-05:002017-05-31T15:27:18.217-05:00The survey of "registered voters" implie...The survey of "registered voters" implies that it wasn't a self-selected group so it might be as accurate as other methodologies. But I cannot find exactly what the selection process was, so I won't confirm that the result is "believable".wphamiltonnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5548360050548401665.post-45256629715573440552017-05-31T15:26:50.943-05:002017-05-31T15:26:50.943-05:00"just under 20% of the public believe he actu...<b>"just under 20% of the public believe he actually committed impeachable offenses" - does not follow.</b><br /><br />Actually simple Math... <br /><br />54% of the 43% want him removed for political purposes (not because they believe he committed any sort of impeachable high crime or misdemeanor)<br /><br />The 54% was both in the article... and in the cross tabs. It was only asked of those who thought he should be impeached. <br /><br />If you calculate the rest (46%) into the 43% you will get a number just under 20%. <br /> C.H. Truthhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07424696045921160961noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5548360050548401665.post-9207742117815828842017-05-31T15:17:50.748-05:002017-05-31T15:17:50.748-05:00How many of those 45 percent who don't want Co...<b>How many of those 45 percent who don't want Congress to impeach Trump, believe that he is guilty of an impeachable offense and just don't care? </b><br /><br />100% of those 45% who don't want Congress to impeach Trump believe he didn't commit an impeachable crime and doesn't care about your conspiracy theories. Commonsensehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01611062965687173944noreply@blogger.com