🤷🏽♀️ like I said, ego problems https://t.co/IpyCkMadP8
— Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@AOC) April 30, 2022
Saturday, April 30, 2022
Does anyone believe she meant Zuckerberg?
Liberals should be off the rails upset with the new Federal Misinformation Governance Board
I have seen liberal after liberal attack state laws that ban CRT and other social political issues from being "taught" in school as "against free speech"
Again... liberal cry about free speech... but what they really want is full control of speech. Their endless hypocrisy allows this to seem logical for them.
Please be careful if you must cut and paste...
Friday, April 29, 2022
A new found faith in humanity?
Luckily I did not lose my wallet last night. But my 19 years son did at the Mall of America. We believe it was likely dropped in a changing room as he tried on some dress cloths for the funeral we went to today. Either way, he noticed he didn't have it as we left the mall, but thought he may have left it in his car. But when we got there he couldn't find it. We made a couple of calls to the stores we were in, but all but one had closed and the one said that they would have probably turned it into Mall Security had they had found it. Mall security said that it would have turned it into Guest Services who was gone for the night. Either way it was a long shot. People rarely turn in wallets.
About that negative GDP number
Thursday, April 28, 2022
Yeah baby!
Next I’m buying Coca-Cola to put the cocaine back in
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) April 28, 2022
At the airport SEA TAC
Danger Will Robinson Danger!
Polling Data
Poll | Date | Sample | Republicans (R) | Democrats (D) | Spread |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
RCP Average | 4/10 - 4/25 | -- | 45.9 | 42.1 | Republicans +3.8 |
Quinnipiac | 4/21 - 4/25 | 1409 RV | 45 | 42 | Republicans +3 |
Politico/Morning Con | 4/22 - 4/25 | 2004 RV | 42 | 43 | Democrats +1 |
Insider Advantage | 4/21 - 4/23 | 750 LV | 51 | 39 | Republicans +12 |
Harvard-Harris | 4/20 - 4/21 | 1966 RV | 50 | 50 | Tie |
Trafalgar Group (R) | 4/18 - 4/20 | 1077 LV | 48 | 39 | Republicans +9 |
Economist/YouGov | 4/16 - 4/19 | 1260 RV | 38 | 43 | Democrats +5 |
Rasmussen Reports | 4/10 - 4/14 | 2500 LV | 47 | 39 | Republicans +8 |
- The average of the Registered Voter polls shows Dems up by just under 1%.
- The average of the Likely Voter polls shows the GOP up by just under 10%.
Wednesday, April 27, 2022
Will the Jan 6th investigation be more of a let down than the Mueller report??
Dems are telling the press they’re worried the country is too “distracted” by inflation to care about their January 6 hearings. pic.twitter.com/C05BDYW1rU
— Emily Jashinsky (@emilyjashinsky) April 27, 2022
Maybe is just too dumb to remember where the five mil came from?
But the president's financial filings reveal that he declared almost $7 million more income on his tax returns than he did on his government transparency reports, an analysis by DailyMail.com of the president's financial records shows.
Some of that difference can be accounted for with salaries earned by First Lady Jill Biden and other sums not required on his reports – but still leaves $5.2million earned by Joe's company and not listed on his transparency reports.
The 'missing millions' – combined with emails on Hunter's abandoned laptop suggesting Joe would have a 10% share in Hunter's blockbuster deal with the Chinese – raise a troubling question: did Joe Biden receive money from the foreign venture?
The Irony of Musk, Twitter, and the liberal meltdown...
BIden sits at 42.7 as the incumbent? Against Trump?
Polling Data
Poll | Date | Sample | MoE | Trump (R) | Biden (D) | Spread |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RCP Average | 3/18 - 4/23 | -- | -- | 45.7 | 42.7 | Trump +3.0 |
Insider Advantage | 4/21 - 4/23 | 750 LV | 3.6 | 47 | 43 | Trump +4 |
Harvard-Harris | 4/20 - 4/21 | 1966 RV | -- | 45 | 43 | Trump +2 |
Emerson | 3/18 - 3/20 | 1023 RV | 3.0 | 45 | 42 | Trump +3 |
Tuesday, April 26, 2022
When the left lost Jack Dorsey...
IN MUSK WE TRUST: Former Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey Says Musk ‘The Singular Solution I Trust’ https://t.co/IaqAgrmCai
— Sean Hannity (@seanhannity) April 26, 2022
Monday, April 25, 2022
Twitter deal imminent?
The deal would come just four days after Musk unveiled a financing package to back the acquisition. This led Twitter’s board to take the deal more seriously and many shareholders to ask the company not to let the opportunity for a deal to slip away, Reuters reported on Sunday.
The sale would represent an admission by Twitter that its new chief executive Parag Agrawal, who took the helm in November, is not making enough traction in making the company more profitable, despite being on track to meet ambitious financial goals the company set for 2023. Twitter’s shares were trading higher than Musk’s offer price as recently as November.
So ultimately it was the "real owners" of Twitter who are demanding that this deal go through in spite of the President and the board being dead set against it. The issue seems to be a realization that the Twitter executives simply do not have a legitimate plan to make money and have probably been advised that they would be opening themselves up for legal action if they refuse this deal.
Moreover, pretty much everyone knows that if this deal falls through and Musk sells off his stock that the Twitter Stock will nosedive back into the $30s. While this scenario might make the board and other liberals with no financial interest happy, neither really has that option of saying they would rather see the same people running a company at $33/share than selling one at $54/share.
What happens next (after Must takes control) will be interesting to say the least. Twitter has about 4000 employees and it is likely that a lot of them will not be happy with the changes taking place. Those in charge of "moderation" and such will likely be resistant to change. So how far and how hard Musk pushes the "free speech" angle is going to be interesting. People will likely quit or some may actually be let go.
But it would be nice to tweet again without having to walk on eggshells worried that your next tweet will get you suspended or banned because some liberal snowflake got triggered. Triggering liberal snowflakes is half the fun of being on Twitter!
This has changed
Sunday, April 24, 2022
The McCarthy attacks another big fat liberal lie!
Why would the President forgive McCarthy after McCarthy suggested he was unfit and should resign? Because McCarthy never suggested he was unfit and should resign!
The suggestion otherwise is..... well a lie.
There’s no word yet on whether or not that proposed conversation between President Trump and minority leader McCarthy ever took place, but if it did, it probably went just as he said. Hey, Mr. President, it looks like the 25th Amendment resolution will pass at least the Pelosi-run House, that’s bad. It may be best if you resign rather than go down in history as removed from office for being “unable to discharge the powers and duties” of office. No? Oh, okay, I thought not
What is also notable about this released/leaked audio is what we don’t hear. We don’t hear McCarthy conspiring with Cheney to remove Trump from office; we don’t hear him state that he personally believes Trump is unfit or that he would support the 25th Amendment resolution they are discussing; we don’t hear him state that he would be upset or angry if Trump refused his advice to resign in the face of 25th Amendment removal; and we don’t hear what he’d “do” if Trump refused his advice.
In other words, this is a great big nothingburger. We already knew that McCarthy, like many in GOP leadership, was (too) quick to condemn President Trump in the hours and days immediately following J6, and we also know that he, like many in GOP leadership, very quickly changed his tune. We also know that President Trump was gracious enough to forgive him his emotional outburst and accept his apology.
Most conservatives are ignoring the latest crazy rantings of people who seem to be capable of nothing other than their latest crazy rant. But those who are addressing this are in the same boat. Pretty much every adults agrees that the attacks on McCarthy are simple more red herring that attempts to conceal the fact that Democrats are slowly destroying America with their hate and anger. McCarthy has nothing to do with anything of substance and it likely will not harm McCarthy's standing in the Republican Party at all.
Sorry liberals. But you are barking up the wrong tree again and nobody but other hateful crazed lunatics care about this. But I hear CNN+ will devote most of their airtime on this, so make sure to sign up and send them your money!
The difference in the investigations... for dummies...
Let's explain this like we are talking to a six year old
This is not rocket science! |
So it seems like some of the country is very interested in the Durham Special Counsel investigation while others are very interested in the Jan 6th commission. I would offer that most of the American population has only a passing interest in either, but so goes the limited attention span of the general population. What are the major differences here between the two investigations?
The Scope:
- The Durham investigation is a criminal investigation where people have been indicted, there is a real trial scheduled for a prominent Clinton figure, there are immunity deals being offered, made rejected, and there are likely more indictments to come. It is being run by prosecutors and criminal investigators.
- The Jan 6th commission is a political investigation where there is no power to indict anyone, they are not bringing anyone to trial, they are no cutting deals, and they are doing little more than rehashing the same events for political reasons. Ultimately these are politicians who are planning on writing a political report where they will argue that the probable 2024 Candidate for President broke the law even though he has already been investigated and not charged by our law enforcement.
The underlying issue:
- The Durham special counsel is investigating the Russian collusion investigation of Donald Trump. At issue is whether or not false information was reported to Law Enforcement and to what degree people within the FBI and other law enforcement knew that the information was false. At a low level, if you falsely accuse someone of a crime and file a false police report that is a crime. Depending on what level of crime you are accusing someone of, it can be a felony. The level we are seeing here involves people within the Clinton campaign paying a variety of people to manufacture false evidence against Donald Trump and then feeding the false evidence to the FBI. According to legal analysts such as Andrew McCarthy we are looking at more than just a false report. He is one of many who believes it is a conspiracy to defraud the Government. The second issue here is to what degree the FBI might have known the evidence was false, but used it anyway. That sort of abuse of power is also criminal and it could all be tied together in a broader scheme.
- The Jan 6th commission is investigating Donald Trump's attempt to delay the counting of the electoral college votes in order to buy time for lawsuits and such to work their way through the courts. They are also investigation any involvement Trump might have had in the Jan 6th riot. For all practical purposes, the "overturning" of the election is political rhetoric. Unless it was done under corrupt pretences (such as attempting as Clinton did to manufacture evidence of fraud) - all of what he did was either perfectly legal or a murky constitutional question that ultimately would have been settled by the Courts (not law enforcement). While there was no crime in trying to "overturn the election" the riot was obviously against the law. The politicians (again) are attempting to prove that Trump "incited" the riot. But rather than attempt to prove it in a legal manner (which they cannot), they are politicizing it. At best for both allegations, the commission can "recommend" that the A.G. prosecute something that he has already investigated and already refused to prosecute.
Bottom line:
There is a reason why Durham has a Special Counsel and is running with the full power of a legal prosecutor. There is also a reason why the Jan 6th commission does not have a Special Counsel and why it is being run by a bunch of Democrat with two never-Trump Republican politicians.
Think about it.