Tuesday, July 19, 2016

VP Choice now settled!

Watchdog: HUD's Castro violated federal law by touting Clinton in interview
Housing Secretary and potential Democratic vice-presidential prospect Julian Castro violated federal law when he touted Hillary Clinton's candidacy in a media interview earlier this year, according to a federal watchdog report released Monday.
The seven-page report by the U.S. Office of Special Counsel concluded Castro violated the Hatch Act, which bars most Executive Branch officials from expressing their political views while on official business. According to the report, he crossed the line during an April 4 interview that mostly was about HUD’s plans to increase Internet access to children and other agency-related issues.
Castro - a man qualified to step in and do the job to
 the same degree of criminal disregard as Hillary

Talk about someone going all out trying to impress a potential future boss! Julian Castro apparently is willing to break the law, just to show how well he can fit into a Hillary Clinton Administration. You got to give him an "A" for effort.  Let's just see if this act of "sucking up" pushes his candidacy over the top!

17 comments:

Commonsense said...

It may be Warren so the Democrat party is going to have two shrill scolds on the ticket.

KD said...

Both of these ladies have something in common, with out their husband they would not have gotten to where they are.

Both love money, love , love , love it.


Clinton Net Worth = $31 Million, remember she said that had Zero when they left office and this does not include the Clinton Crime Family slush fund

Warren = $17 Million
"The Boston Herald and in an article in the Huffington Post, both of which say Warren’s house is worth $5 million."

Worth Noting is that both of these liberal ass hats talk about income inequality and white privilege both have exploded the system to enrich themselves.

Always remember the liberal gets rich off the backs of the poor by having the poor vote them money from the tax payers.

wphamilton said...

There is no proof that Julian Castro had the intent for anyone to hear what he was saying. And we don't know that Castro is "sophisticated" enough to recognize prohibited political speech when he says it.

Therefore, according to the bar set by the FBI and the Justice Department in the Clinton investigation, he cannot be prosecuted even if his actions are illegal. Since there won't be prosecution, there's nothing wrong with what he did that an insincere apology won't fix.

I sense a trap here, goading Republicans into reacting to criminal actions; straight from the Clinton playbook. After all, "Just move on" is something of a campaign slogan these days.

Indy Voter said...

Good one, WP.

KD said...

Really, Castro spoke words but never had the intent anyone would hear them?

AG suspends the RULE OF LAW for Hillbilly and Friends, some nation you got there WP.

KD, Grwo up said...

The credibility of Massachusetts Democratic Senate candidate Elizabeth Warren took another hit today as Boston radio talk show host Howie Carr released evidence that appears to confirm Ms. Warren may have plagiarized at least three of the five recipes she submitted to the 1984 Pow Wow Chow cookbook edited by her cousin Candy Rowsey.
Two of the possibly plagiarized recipes, said in the Pow Wow Chow cookbook to have been passed down through generations of Oklahoma Native American members of the Cherokee tribe, are described in a NewYork Times News Service story as originating at Le Pavilion, a fabulously expensive French restaurant in Manhattan. The dishes were said to be particular favorites of the Duke and Duchess of Windsor and Cole Porter.

The two recipes, “Cold Omelets with Crab Meat” and “Crab with Tomato Mayonnaise Dressing,” appear in an article titled “Cold Omelets with Crab Meat,” written by Pierre Franey of the New York Times News Service that was published in the August 22, 1979 edition of the Virgin Islands Daily News, a copy of which can be seen here.

Ms. Warren’s 1984 recipe for Crab with Tomato Mayonnaise Dressing is a word-for-word copy of Mr. Franey’s 1979 recipe."

Warren has many other time she has plagiarized.

KD, sorry WP said...

Sorry WP, I re-read your post, totally tongue and cheek, my bad.

Commonsense said...

WP has a wicked sense of humor.

Opie' said...

Headline from Wapo!!!!! But bill did a 22 year old and is evil while Trump is holy!!!!!! Good call CH!!!!


An affair, two divorces, three marriages — when a messy private life no longer matters

C.H. Truth said...

There is no proof that Julian Castro had the intent for anyone to hear what he was saying. And we don't know that Castro is "sophisticated" enough to recognize prohibited political speech when he says it.

Okay... that's really funny. Probably does "more" to make him a fitting VP selection, wouldn't you agree!

C.H. Truth said...

Opie -

A guy who cannot tell the difference between workplace sexual improprieties (that cost the Clintons $850,000 in sexual harassment settlements) and private personal behavior.

But let's face it Opie... If this election was really about "private behavior" of the families in question and setting a high standard for the American public. I don't believe either one is qualified to lead the nation.

Better we pick someone boring like Mike Pense, huh?

opie' said...


A guy who cannot tell the difference between workplace sexual improprieties

Your condescending BS is just that, BS. Where I worked, the GM was not only doing a youngster, the youngster was his daughters best friend and worked in the division. A real winner, like trump, nasty as they come. As I said before, neither candidate enthuses me, but I will vote the D based on the SCOTUS and environmental issues, something you don't care about but worry about where someones dick has been. just like donald. I'm sure you are as clean as pense.

C.H. Truth said...

Opie - I am not as clean as Pense and I don't care where anyone's dick has been. Unless it goes somewhere against the will of another person, or ends up in an employee because you promise them career advancement. Both cross the line from private personal behavior into something larger.

I may have been around the block a couple of times, but I never had to offer job advancement for personal sexual favors.

Anonymous said...

After all, "Just move on" is something of a campaign slogan these days.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

right up there with "what difference at this point does it make" and "willing suspension of disbelief."

KD, Cop Killed in Kansas City Kansas TODAY said...

Today in Kansas City, Kansas another Police Officer was Killed.

Liberal, enjoy this death as you have others in blue that have been Murdered, this makes 11 Officers in 9 days.

Obama started this fire and your political team owns it.


ObamaNation

Opie' said...

I don't care where anyone's dick has been. "

Sure CH, You are obsessed with clinton's improprieties and where he dipped his stick. If you didn't care, you would not keep bringing the subject up. Sad CH, but your actions don't match your words and show you do give a crap. Oh well, your slip is showing again. LOL

but I never had to offer job advancement for personal sexual favors.

You were never in a position to ask for such favors. LOL

C.H. Truth said...

Actually Opie - You brought it up at 9:09 AM this morning. Not me. I think we would find that you bring it up right around 99.99% of the time.

More to the point, I take issue with Clinton lying to federal investigators, and the fact he shelled out $850,000 to settle a harassment lawsuit. What do you take issue with?