Maybe you have heard, or maybe you just watch the Clinton News Network, but a Clinton campaign bus was caught red handed dumping it's toilets on a street in Lawrenceville Georgia. This quite obviously left a tangible "stench" behind that no doubt went along with the metaphorical stench of the 2016 campaign.
The campaign suggested that they did not know that they were actually doing anything wrong, (where have we heard to at before?) much less illegal. Since they claim no
mens rea for this shitty action, I would guess that "no reasonable prosecutor" would bring charges.
38 comments:
rrb already shit this out
Great punditry.
Cesspool commentary.
Oh no, Ch. Your beloved L.A. Times polling is now telling us that Hillary and Donald are tied nationally.
That must mean she's far, far ahead!
Oh no!
Oh no!
You're now giving her an aggregate 4.00 national lead.
That must mean she leads by 7 or 8 or 9.
For example, your more honest forecasting expert
at electionprojection.com, now gives Hillary a 7.6% lead.
He also projects 351 electoral votes for her.
You only project 322.
Why do you behave so niggardly toward her?
CH, your fall is now complete with this shitty thread. How the mighty have fallen. Maybe you should go work for donnie and use your great analytical skills to tell him how the polls have him really behind. Unlike when he used to like the polls. LOL
Head baked puts up repetitive threads daily, but he's gonna whine about this repeating one if rrb's?
And we now have wikileaks, another fbi doc dump implicating Hillary, and the okeefe videos proving election fraud by Clinton. Yes, the alarmingly complicit news media has put in a blackout of all of it, preferring to continue to smear trump over unsubstantiated allegations.
What does Hillary have to do to lose your votes??
James, Opie, and Roger...
Apparently trying to make their case for why there should be no comment moderation.
Does any of the three of them ever have an original thought process that's not just an outright insult?
9:24-37 are tongue-in-cheek "insults" that hit you only because you played into them.
I can well understand that you would want to "moderate" (censor) them.
Nope
TIME has an article entitled:
"Why This Presidential Debate Is Donald Trump’s Last Stand"
and subtitled:
"The Republican has a final opportunity in Wednesday's debate to resurrect his campaign"
__________
But not much of a chance, I'd say.
James, answer me this.
Hillary stated clearly that she will raise tax rates on anyone that had capital gains.
That means, IF you own a home and build equity then sell that home 3 years later and sell it for more then you bought it for, the risk you took in buying it and earning that money in turn is now going to be taxed at a higher rate then today.
How does taxing the home seller more help grow the middle class?
9:24-37 are tongue-in-cheek "insults"
Doesn't sound "tongue-in-cheek". Sounds more truculent and mean-spirited.
Well, as Roger has so often pointed out, you lack a sense of humor.
:-)
Na, my sense of humor is far more sophisticated than you or Roger's frat-boy, gutter, potty-mouth humor.
They are not mean spirited... they are simply not thought provoking or interesting in the least. I cannot imagine why "anyone" else would care to read them.
After April (my wedding) I will likely be switching to Disqus - I can approve a set of members who are not required to be moderated, while leaving others (and guests) to be moderated.
That way, those who want to leave comments and engage in conversation, can. While those who simply choose to spam, insult, and generally leave comments that only amuse themselves can do it elsewhere.
11:21. Woohoo!
Ch, the following is so good I felt you'd not object to it all appearing here:
From the New York Times Opinion Pages
"WIKIHILLARY"
by co-ed columnist Thomas L. Friedman
OCT. 19, 2016
__________
Thank God for WikiLeaks.
I confess, I was starting to wonder about what the real Hillary Clinton — the one you never get to see behind closed doors — really stood for. But now that, thanks to WikiLeaks, I’ve had a chance to peruse her speeches to Goldman Sachs and other banks, I am more convinced than ever she can be the president America needs today.
Seriously, those speeches are great! They show someone with a vision, a pragmatic approach to getting things done and a healthy instinct for balancing the need to strengthen our social safety nets with unleashing America’s business class to create the growth required to sustain social programs.
So thank you, Vladimir Putin, for revealing how Hillary really hopes to govern. I just wish more of that Hillary were campaigning right now and building a mandate for what she really believes.
WikiHillary? I’m with her.
Why? Let’s start with what WikiLeaks says she said at Brazil’s Banco Itaú event in May 2013: “I think we have to have a concerted plan to increase trade ... and we have to resist protectionism, other kinds of barriers to market access and to trade.”
She also said, “My dream is a hemispheric common market, with open trade and open borders, some time in the future with energy that is as green and sustainable as we can get it, powering growth and opportunity for every person in the hemisphere.”
That’s music to my ears. A hemisphere where nations are trading with one another, and where more people can collaborate and interact for work, study, tourism and commerce, is a region that is likely to be growing more prosperous with fewer conflicts, especially if more of that growth is based on clean energy.
Compare our hemisphere, or the European Union, or the Asian trading nations with, say, the Middle East — where the flow of trade, tourism, knowledge and labor among nations has long been restricted — and the case for Hillary’s vision becomes obvious.
The way Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump have made trade and globalization dirty words is ridiculous. Globalization and trade have helped to bring more people out of poverty in the last 50 years than at any other time in history.
Do we need to make adjustments so the minority of the U.S. population that is hurt by freer trade and movements of labor is compensated and better protected? You bet we do. That’s called fixing a problem — not throwing out a whole system that we know from a long historical record contributes on balance to economic growth, competitiveness and more open societies.
In a speech to a Morgan Stanley group on April 18, 2013, WikiHillary praised the Simpson-Bowles deficit reduction plan, which included reforming the tax code to increase investment and entrepreneurship and raising certain taxes and trimming some spending and entitlements to make them more sustainable.
The ultimate shape of that grand bargain could take many forms, she said, but Hillary stressed behind closed doors: “Simpson-Bowles … put forth the right framework. Namely, we have to restrain spending, we have to have adequate revenues and we have to incentivize growth. It’s a three-part formula.
She is right. We’ll never get out of this economic rut, and protect future generations, unless the business and social sectors, Democrats and Republicans, all give and get something — and that’s exactly where WikiHillary was coming from.
In an October 2013 speech for Goldman Sachs, Clinton seemed to suggest the need to review the regulations imposed on banks by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, which was passed in 2010. Her idea was not to get rid of all of the rules but rather to make sure they were not imposing needless burdens that limited lending to small businesses and start-ups.
As Clinton put it, “More thought has to be given to the process and transactions and regulations so that we don’t kill or maim what works, but we concentrate on the most effective way of moving forward with the brainpower and the financial power that exists here.” Again, exactly right.
You can also find WikiHillary, or her aides, musing about a “carbon tax” and whether or not to come out in favor of it, as Sanders did. She chose not to now, probably to avoid being saddled by Republicans with calling for a new tax in the general election campaign, but I am confident she’d make pricing carbon part of her climate policy.
When I read WikiHillary, I hear a smart, pragmatic, center-left politician who will be inclined to work with both the business community and Republicans to keep America tilted toward trade expansion, entrepreneurship and global integration, while redoubling efforts to cushion workers from the downsides of these policies.
I’m just sorry that campaign Hillary felt she could not speak like WikiHillary to build a proper mandate for President Hillary. She would have gained respect for daring to speak the truth to her own constituency — and demonstrating leadership — not lost votes.
Nonetheless, thanks to WikiLeaks, I am reassured that she has the right balance of instincts on the issues I care about most. So, again, thank you, Putin, for exposing that Hillary. She could make a pretty good president for these times.
Re: 11:21
Yeah, I can understand why you feel a bit thin-skinned, Ch, when someone points out that your projections and those of the prognosticator at electionprojection.com (whom you have praised for his objectivity, and I agree) are at so much variance.
Does any of the three of them ever
I guess you didn't lie my comment about this shitty thread. Humor is not your forte. I guess your superior intellect and putting words in others mouths makes you the smartest poster here. I couldn't care less if you moderated anything if you did it without bias, something you do not have. I would bet the number of posts would again plummet, but you don't care. Do it. Please
James - the only difference between what Scott Elliot is showing and what I have showing is that he very recently changed Ohio and Arizona to Clinton. That being said, RCP has Trump back up in Ohio after two good polls released this week, and Arizona is at a virtual tie at 0.2%.
Making a pick in those two states is flipping a coin as far as I am concerned. More to the point, I haven't seriously looked at the state numbers (nor will I likely do so) at all this year. My 'projections' are nothing more than what the cumulative polls are showing.
But since it bothers you so much, I will simply move Ohio and Arizona to "toss up". So I hope you feel better now.
I will likely be switching to Disqus - I can approve a set of members who are not required to be moderated,
Sounds like a reasonable compromise.
Trump Invited Debate Guests from Clinton’s ‘Sordid Past’
Trump campaign CEO Steve Bannon says Donald Trump is “the master of the head fake,” CNN reports.
Bannon also claimed the news that President Obama’s Trump-supporting half-brother Malik Obama is attending tonight’s final presidential debate is “just an appetizer.”
He added that Trump will be bringing guests who “expose Bill and Hillary’s sordid past.”
_____________
Prediction: The only thing these shenanigans will expose is Trump's abject desperation.
Kasich Calls Rigged Election Claims ‘Silly’
Ohio Gov. John Kasich (R) is hitting back against Donald Trump’s claim that the election is “rigged,” CBS News reports.
Said Kasich: “Look, to say that elections are rigged and all these votes are stolen — that’s like saying we never landed on the moon, frankly. That’s how silly it is.”
__________
Trump Campaign Manager Doesn’t Expect Rigged Election
Donald Trump’s campaign manager said that she did not think the election will be rigged, though she argued that there’s “a larger conspiracy” working against her candidate, Politico reports.
Said Kellyanne Conway: “No, I do not believe that. So absent overwhelming evidence that there is, it would not be for me to say that there is.”
Hillary pays the DNC to Hire a Group that is protected by Obama's IRS to pay thugs to cause damage to property and hurt people.
This is just the Chicago Way.
James, I saw that you believe now that this economy is in a low wage, low job growth, low income "rut".
When did you come to that economic/financial conclusion?
”We are contracted directly with the DNC and the campaign. I am contracted to [Robert Creamer] but I answer to the head of special events for the DNC and the head of special events and political for the campaign. "
Yep, the ordered hit on your fellow American comes from Hillary and Obama.
Mr. Robert Creamer -- husband of Illinois Rep. Jan Schakowsky, Dem.
Well a look see at the visitor log at the Obama White House shows Mr. Robert Creamer logging in around 300 times to see whom, you might ask, to see Obama.
Don't for a second think that this does not go to Hillary and Obama, they are the puppet masters of the Press and these thugs.
Trump Once Praised Clinton as a ‘Great Senator’
Donald Trump has called Hillary Clinton’s two terms as a U.S. Senator a “disaster” BUT in a 2008 interview Trump praised her and Bill Clinton for their time in elected office, CNN reports.
Said Trump: “Well, I think her history is far from being over. I’d like to answer that question in another 15 years from now. I think she is going to go down at a minimum as a great senator. I think she is a great wife to a president. And I think Bill Clinton was a great president.”
Too many American households live paycheck to paycheck
One of the best ways to determine if we're doing a good job of saving is evaluating our ability to handle unforeseen expenses. And, in this area, we're failing miserably.
According to a Federal Reserve report, nearly half of Americans couldn't cover a $400 emergency expense without borrowing the money or selling something. More than half of households have less than one month's worth of income in a readily available savings account, far from the six-month emergency fund many experts recommend."
Yep, there is more good news in the O'Hillary world of debt and lying.
The average American has more credit card debt today , then they carried in 2008. Why in a "Booming Economy" would that be a fact of life?
It's not just the Chicago way, to send paid protesters to any political event. It's the everywhere way, for any political organization, and Creamer is right it's been that way for at least decades.
I wrote about it here, I think it was the last Presidential election. I had my eyes opened in the early 80's, when I thought that I was helping an environmental campaign in Texas. For a couple of weeks. The organization was for real - it had real data, reports, the whole nine yards and I went through all of it. But the foot soldier level were just paid operatives. Pro's, and I was "in" with the pro's enough to tap into the grapevine whenever some campaign or other party was recruiting for an operation. Any politics, any reason, it didn't matter to these people. You go out to the site, do whatever their thing is, and get paid.
It's not just the bottom level either; it's career and paycheck all the way up and I'd be surprised were it any different for any activist group of any stripe. This group's own data proved that their cherished initiatives were spitting in the wind compared to concurrent environmental problems many orders of magnitude worse. It was a sham, and if you mentioned it you were stupid because achieving something doesn't matter. The issue is only a lever, only useful inasmuch as people will believe it.
So yeah, The DNC hired protesters to disrupt Trump rallies. Trump hired them, Sanders hired them, and I'd wager that a lot of them are the same people. It is ugly and disgusting, but you shouldn't be shocked by it.
"After April (my wedding) I will likely be switching to Disqus - I can approve a set of members who are not required to be moderated, while leaving others (and guests) to be moderated."
First, congratulations!
Secondly, you'll be making your blog great again - spam-troll-free.
Post a Comment