Friday, December 9, 2016

Hillary Campaign in meltdown mode

So Hillary Clinton is at it again. She simply cannot just go away and be a graceful loser here folks. Just yesterday she proclaimed: 
The epidemic of malicious fake news and false propaganda that flooded social media over the past year -- it’s now clear that so-called fake news can have real world consequences
The real world consequences, of course, was her losing the election. Just another in a long line of conspiracies and excuses for why she was beaten like a drum by Donald Trump on election night, as he cruised to a 306-232 shellacking of the former Secretary.


To date:
  • The election was lost because of "FBI conspiracy"
  • The election was lost because of "alt-right racism"
  • The election was lost because of "fake news"
  • The election was lost because of "media bias"
  • The election was lost because of "Russian hacking" 
  • The election was lost because of "Electoral College"

The other day, at a post election get together at Harvard, the Clinton campaign representatives openly suggested that the Trump campaign won because they appealed specifically to "White Supremacist". As if somehow the estimated five thousand Klan members, and all those Aryan Brotherhood folks in Prison put Trump over the edge.

They also disingenuously suggested that they would rather lose the way that they did, than win the way Trump did? Apparently losing because you couldn't convince enough un-American deplorable voters that Trump was a rabid, out of control, sexist, racist, bigot, who wasn't qualified to run a lemonade stand is somehow more dignified that winning by promising to make our country great again.. Did these people loose their ability to reason, or was it never really there?

It's time for all of you Clinton supporters to put on your big girl panties and get the *&^% over it. Trump won, fair and square... and it wasn't even that close. He's the President elect, and Hillary is now a private citizen who can now focus on running what ever is left of the Clinton Foundation (now that there is no longer any political influence to be had).

61 comments:

caliphate4vr said...

it’s now clear that so-called fake news can have real world consequences

So says the woman named for Sir Edmund Hillary, who was born before he was famous, lied about the Marines rejecting her over her age, had her dreams of being an astronaut crushed by NASA, landed in Bosnia under sniper fire, made $100k in cattle futures....

If anyone knows fake news, it's her

opie said...

And don't forget her play to play and millions made illegally from giving speeches.

Ch is now bitching about a loser, just like the good accolade he is, can't even be a gracious winner. Oh well, I'm sure all the current picks meet his approval and will do everything he wants them to. LOL

caliphate4vr said...

The Russian Hacker has Been Identified

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

Speaking of melt down.

Trump was blaming him for the decisions by companies that ship American jobs overseas.


The Twitter message from the president-elect at 7:41 Wednesday night, and a second one urging Mr. Jones to “spend more time working — less time talking,” continued Mr. Trump’s pattern of digital assaults, most of them aimed at his political rivals, reporters, Hollywood celebrities or female accusers. On Tuesday morning, Mr. Trump used Twitter to assail Boeing for escalating costs on the development of a new Air Force One.

But rarely has Mr. Trump used Twitter to express his ire at people like Mr. Jones, the president of United Steelworkers Local 1999, who described himself on Thursday as “just a regular working guy.” With the full power of the presidency just weeks away, Mr. Trump’s decision to single out Mr. Jones for ridicule has drawn condemnation from historians and White House veterans.

“When you attack a man for living an ordinary life in an ordinary job, it is bullying,” said Nicolle Wallace, who was communications director for President George W. Bush and a top strategist to other Republicans. “It is cyberbullying. This is a strategy to bully somebody who dissents. That’s what is dark and disturbing.”

Anonymous said...

“When you attack a man for living an ordinary life in an ordinary job, it is bullying,” said Nicolle Wallace
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

gee ms. wallace, where was all this outrage when joe the plumber was mercilessly attacked by the 0linsky regime and by the press (sorry for the redundancy) for "living an ordinary life in an ordinary job", but having the audacity to ask skeets a simple question about socialism?

the msm praetorian guard working on behalf of the 0linsky regime dug up every possible molecule of dirt they could find on joe, and hammered him for months in a blatant overt attempt to ruin his life.

hypocrisy.

bedrock.

liberalism.

trump called out a goonion hack who called HIM out first.

get used to it, liberals.

Anonymous said...


MEMORIES PIZZA: WHERE THE TRUMP REVOLUTION BEGAN?

“I don’t know that I ever would have recommended watching a Milo video, but this one is genuinely informative, even moving. The interview with owners Kevin O’Connor and his daughter Crystal doesn’t start until the nine-minute mark, so fast-forward. They are gentle, kind, normal, small-town people. This interview really amplifies the horror of what the Social Justice Warrior mob did to them. It’s a relief to see that their business still thrives. Milo points out in the interview that the O’Connors have no problem serving gay clientele — they served him, after all. He also says in the interview that he believes the liberal mob descending on their heads is one of the events that shocked a lot of Americans into voting for Donald Trump. Trump was not a candidate at that point, of course; what he means is that seeing what the left can and will do to the little guy, all in the name of #LoveWins™, helped radicalize a lot of middle-American people towards Trump.”


https://pjmedia.com/instapundit/251345/#respond

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

President Barack Obama has ordered U.S. intelligence agencies to deliver to him a dossier of the evidence that the Russian government used cyber attacks and other means to intervene in the 2016 election, possibly with the idea of making more information public, a senior intelligence official tells NBC News.

White House counterterrorism advisor Lisa Monaco told reporters that the results of the report would be shared with lawmakers and others. Obama leaves office on Jan. 20.

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

Beaner hater, hates this.

El presidente Barack Obama ordenó a las agencias de inteligencia estadounidenses entregarle un expediente de la evidencia de que el gobierno ruso utilizó ataques cibernéticos y otros medios para intervenir en las elecciones de 2016, posiblemente con la idea de hacer pública más información. Noticias.

El asesor de contraterrorismo de la Casa Blanca, Lisa Monaco, dijo a periodistas que los resultados del informe serían compartidos con legisladores y otros. Obama deja el cargo el 20 de enero.

C.H. Truth said...

President Barack Obama has ordered U.S. intelligence agencies to deliver to him a dossier of the evidence that the Russian government used cyber attacks and other means to intervene in the 2016 election, possibly with the idea of making more information public, a senior intelligence official tells NBC News.

So he is wanting the collective intelligence agencies to contribute to the empty envelope?

Anonymous said...

So he is wanting the collective intelligence agencies to contribute to the empty envelope?
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

that's what's cracking me up about this whole russian hacking claim.

we seem to have evidence that the russians breached our government IT networks as well as DNC networks.

OK, so let's start there.

what seems to be missing is evidence of what they did after gaining access.

all i keep hearing from the clinton campaign is the endless cries of "we lost because russia hacking!!!11!"

so what specifically did they do once they gained access? what did they steal? what harm did they bring to the election? to the DNC? to the FEC? to balloting and voting systems? this is serious so please be specific.




it reminds me of liberal outrage after the housing bubble burst and TARP was born.

some of the same liberals were crying - "bankers need to go to jail!!!11!"

and i kept asking - ok, for what, exactly? what law(s) did they break? this is serious so please be specific.

then as now, what i got was fucking *crickets*

KD, This WIn is bigger, better and funnier then i hoped it would be said...

millions made illegally from giving speeches. "


Nope, wrong again odopie,,, legal speeches and legally paid, but, with HER (remember the election was about HER, when she made it about her broken pussy ,,, "I'M with HER)... losing this election Twice, she can not repay those investments.

Showing again investing in Hillary is a one way venture, she gets rich.


KD, HB have you left the USA forever? said...

Consumer Confidence enjoys a nice Trump Effect bounce.

Nov closing week 93.8
Dec opening week 98.0

I hope you took Paul Krugman and HB's advice upon realizing the Trump Win, those too losers told you to sell, sell and sell.

If you did that , you got only poorer as you deserve.

wphamilton said...

Did these people loose their ability to reason, or was it never really there?

CH, I've been prodding discussions on some of the Washington Post and Huffington Post news stories, in an honest attempt to find an answer to this question. Seriously, not trolling but just lay out one or two facts and evaluate the responses.

As near as I can tell, at some point the followers of Hillary have willingly suspended reason, accepting on faith that every criticism was either a political attack ("never proven" they say) or else arises from bigotry, sexism, racism, or stupidity. Irregardless of the criticism. Even when I make a statement of simple fact, such as "Hillary Clinton's campaign failed", you'd think I was skinning kittens from some reactions. I don't think that they lost reason, and I don't think that they lack the ability, but they have previously delegated all reasoning, all critical inquiry, to a politician and cannot now admit the mistake.

There is, literally, no reasoning possible with many of them.

KD, Hillary running out of Days to a Recount WIN. said...

Senate Democrats are about to shut down the US Government, unwilling to pass a funding bill that has to be passed by midnight tonight.


How come this has not been headlining the news, oh, wait, it is because the Dems are doing it, never mind.

KD, Just a view from the fly over country said...

There is, literally, no reasoning possible with many of them."WP


May I.


I have read a lot at Huffpo, I don't add my voice because I would be shouted down, so I read,,, I get the feeling that this election was HER Time, that she had it all, HB once gave a list of like ten things on why she would win and big. As I recall it included, but not limited to Hillary , had the money, the ground game , She Had Obama, Bill, Biden and she had her superior Financial plan for the Middle Income earner, yet, it was not to be, not really even close at 306 to 232, that is not close.

So I believe they are in disbelief that she lost, it was , in their mind a sure thing, the polls said it was, she said it was, it was going to be HER time to be Historic for our first Woman President,,, it may be as easy as the Hillary true believer has a non-combat PTSD.

As much as I hate to label anyone.

KD, The Recount is going great , For Trump said...

I think we should sell public lands to reduce the defecit, and we have to Tap DiFI to do it, she has shown she is a proven winner.


"California Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein is back in the news as the giant real estate investment firm run by her husband, Rich Blum, is possibly poised to earn as much as $1 billion in commissions from selling U.S. Postal Service buildings across the country.

Several years ago, Feinstein said that she exerted no influence in the process that led to Blum’s company, CBRE Group, then the world’s largest commercial real estate services firm, obtaining an exclusive contract to market USPS facilities—as part of a larger federal effort to reduce the deficit."

Yep, rock n roll.

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...


President-elect Donald Trump is receiving an average of one presidential intelligence briefing a week, according to U.S. officials familiar with the matter, far fewer than most of his recent predecessors....Trump has asked for at least one briefing, and possibly more, from intelligence agencies on specific subjects, one of the officials said. The source declined to identify what subjects interested the president-elect, but said that so far they have not included Russia or Iran.

Four years of this shit. OMG

Honest, decent, truthful Rev. said...

He doesn't like briefings because he doesn't like facts.

Honest, decent, truthful Rev. said...

Obama Orders Report on Russian Hacking

President Obama has ordered a “full review” of Russian hacking during the November election, as pressure from Congress has grown for greater public understanding of exactly what Moscow did to interfere in the electoral process, the Washington Post reports.

Said homeland-security adviser Lisa Monaco: “We may have crossed into a new threshold, and it is incumbent upon us to take stock of that, to review, to conduct some after-action, to understand what has happened and to impart some lessons learned.”

Obama wants the report before he leaves office on January 20.
__________

Will we discover that Putin won the election?

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

Trump is too busy on Twitter, than to be the commander in chief of the United States.

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

allegations against Puzder are similar to those against Bannon, the head of Breitbart News whom Trump named as his chief strategist and senior counselor in November.

Police responded to a hang-up 911 call at Bannon’s home on New Year’s Day, 1996, according to a Santa Monica police report obtained by Politico. They were met at the door by Bannon’s then-wife, Mary Louise Piccard, who claimed that she and Bannon got into a fight after she asked him for money for groceries. The couple had twin infants.

She told police that Bannon grabbed her by the wrist and the neck during a physical altercation. She got away from him and attempted to call 911, but Bannon wrestled the phone away from her and tossed it across the room, she said.

An officer who responded to the scene noticed red marks on Piccard’s left wrist and the right side of her neck, which were photographed.

A domestic violence protective order was issued against Bannon, who was charged with misdemeanor domestic violence, battery and dissuading a witness from reporting a crime. He pleaded not guilty, but the case was ultimately dismissed when Piccard failed to show up in court.

According to court records obtained by The New York Times, Piccard claimed that Bannon ordered her to leave town to avoid testifying. Bannon told her that “if I went to court he and his attorney would make sure that I would be the one who was guilty,” she said.

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

Money buys silence.

Trump, too, faced an allegation of abusing his first wife, Ivana Trump. She later disavowed the claims.

In a divorce deposition, she claimed that Trump raped her on one occasion. The alleged incident was described in the biography Lost Tycoon: The Many Lives of Donald J. Trump by author Harry Hurt III. According to Hurt’s telling of the story, Trump came home furious after he underwent a painful scalp reduction operation performed by a plastic surgeon his then-wife had used in the past.

From the book:

The Donald flings Ivana down on the bed. Then he pins back her arms and grabs her by the hair. The part of her head he is grabbing corresponds to the spot on his head where the scalp reduction operation has been done. The Donald starts ripping out Ivana’s hair by the handful, as if he is trying to make her feel the same kind of pain that he is feeling.

Ivana starts crying and screaming. The entire bed is being covered with strands of her golden locks. But The Donald is not finished. He rips off her clothes and unzips his pants. Then he jams his penis inside her for the first time in more than sixteen months.

Ivana is terrified. This is not lovemaking. This is not romantic sex. It is a violent assault. She later describes what The Donald is doing to her in no uncertain terms. According to the versions she repeats to some of her closest confidantes, “He raped me.”
The book includes a written statement from Ivana Trump in which she confirms that she said Trump had raped her. However, she clarified that she did not want her words to be interpreted in a literal or criminal sense.

After this incident was unearthed by The Daily Beast in 2015, she released a statement calling the story “totally without merit.”

“I have recently read some comments attributed to me from nearly 30 years ago at a time of very high tension during my divorce from Donald. The story is totally without merit,” it read. “Donald and I are the best of friends and together have raised three children that we love and are very proud of. I have nothing but fondness for Donald and wish him the best of luck on his campaign. Incidentally, I think he would make an incredible president.”

Trump has also been accused of sexual misconduct by over a dozen women.

______

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
caliphate4vr said...

And Hillary was drinking blood and raping children in the basement of a pizza parlor.

Fucking hack

Honest, decent, truthful Rev. said...

A pizza parlor is really not a very good place to go to drink blood.

Honest, decent, truthful Rev. said...

Something for Cali.

Why the Republican health care plan will fail.

http://www.electoral-vote.com/evp2016/Pres/Maps/Dec09.html#item-2

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

The CIA has concluded in a secret assessment that Russia intervened in the 2016 election to help Donald Trump win the presidency, rather than just to undermine confidence in the U.S. electoral system, according to officials briefed on the matter.

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

By Adam Entous, Ellen Nakashima and Greg Miller December 9 at 7:36 PM
The CIA has concluded in a secret assessment that Russia intervened in the 2016 election to help Donald Trump win the presidency, rather than just to undermine confidence in the U.S. electoral system, according to officials briefed on the matter.

Intelligence agencies have identified individuals with connections to the Russian government who provided WikiLeaks with thousands of hacked emails from the Democratic National Committee and others, including Hillary Clinton’s campaign chairman, according to U.S. officials. Those officials described the individuals as actors known to the intelligence community and part of a wider Russian operation to boost Trump and hurt Clinton’s chances.

“It is the assessment of the intelligence community that Russia’s goal here was to favor one candidate over the other, to help Trump get elected,” said a senior U.S. official briefed on an intelligence presentation made to U.S. senators. “That’s the consensus view.”

The Obama administration has been debating for months how to respond to the alleged Russian intrusions, with White House officials concerned about escalating tensions with Moscow and being accused of trying to boost Clinton’s campaign.

In September, during a secret briefing for congressional leaders, Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell (Ky.) voiced doubts about the veracity of the intelligence, according to officials present. That's not a surprise!

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

Red State Weather.

The Southeast Is Becoming A Wildfire Hotspot
By Lyndsey Gilpin

Filed under Wildfires
Christin Chandler was at work at Sugarlands Distilling Co. in downtown Gatlinburg, Tennessee, on Nov. 28 when she noticed that the sky had taken on an unnatural orange glow. Outside, the smoke was so thick she couldn’t see oncoming traffic. The 34-year-old, who lives in Knoxville and commutes an hour to work every day, knew wildfires had been popping up in the surrounding forests for weeks, but something seemed different about this one. So she got out of town. “I didn’t realize how quickly it would spread,” Chandler said.

The wildfire started Nov. 23 on Chimney Tops mountain in Great Smoky Mountains National Park and traveled with the wind to the city several miles away. By the time Chandler returned a week later, the mountainside behind her office, and all the houses on it, were destroyed. The local Jeep rental company was “burnt to a crisp,” she said, with only frames of vehicles left standing. Her friend’s apartment building was rubble. She heard stories about people, unable to drive because of down power lines and smoke, running out of town. “It was haunting.”

As of Wednesday, the Chimney Tops 2 fire had killed 14 people, forced as many as 14,000 to evacuate and damaged more than 1,700 structures, including many homes, tourist attractions and resorts in Gatlinburg and Pigeon Forge. The blaze has scorched more than 17,000 acres and was 82 percent contained as of Thursday, according to the National Interagency Fire Center.

The Gatlinburg fire is the deadliest of many that have torn through the southern U.S.1 this fall. As of this week, four large wildfires still burned in the region. According to the Forest Service, wildfires have scorched more than 1.4 million acres in the South so far this year — more than double the total in 2015. The Washington Post reported Wednesday that two juveniles had been charged with aggravated arson in the Gatlinburg fire. Most wildfires are caused by people; according to the National Park Service, humans ignite as many as 90 percent of them.

Fueled by possible signals of climate change such as widespread drought and record-setting heat waves, this wildfire season may be a sign of things to come for the Southeast, which is densely populated and, in some areas, less accustomed to dealing with so many vicious fires. “The Southeast has had droughts and a significant amount of wildfires, but [this year] is significantly more than average,” said Jeff Prestemon, project leader of the forestry sciences lab at the Forest Service’s Southern Research Station. “We can’t attribute a particular event to climate change, but we may have more of these events in the future.”

KD, Just helping said...

HB, Jane, and Opium,,, a yes or no question.


Did Hillary lose the Presidential Election to Donald Trump?

KD said...

Remember how often HB, Jane and Opium complained about Citizens United and how cash was going to buy this election, well, wrong again.

"Hillary Clinton’s losing campaign cost a record $1.2B"

The Winner , Trump $600 million."

It was so easy, spend the money in target states that a message of Jobs and higher wages won the day.

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

Now he is appointing Goldman Sachs executive director of budget

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

[Trump isn’t draining the swamp. He’s deepening it.]

Had Hillary Clinton won the election, the white working class might have gotten some tangible benefits — a higher minimum wage, overtime pay, paid family and medical leave, more secure health insurance, and so on. Trump and the Republicans oppose all that. So what did the white working class actually get? They got the election itself. They got to give a big middle finger to the establishment, to the coastal elites, to immigrants, to feminists, to college students, to popular culture, to political correctness, to every person and impersonal force they see arrayed against them. And that was it.

They got fucked.

Commonsense said...

There is one prerequisite for all those tangible benefits.

A job. Without a job they are meaningless. That is what Trump understands and Obama never could.

opie said...

Between this pick and the nomination of linda pin-em- mcmahon, lead the way of making america a laughingstock again..

Mr. Pruitt wrote this in National Review in May: “Global warming has inspired one of the major policy debates of our time. That debate is far from settled. Scientists continue to disagree about the degree and extent of global warming and its connection to the actions of mankind. That debate should be encouraged — in classrooms, public forums, and the halls of Congress. It should not be silenced with threats of prosecution. Dissent is not a crime.”

Dissent, indeed, is not a crime, and acknowledging the uncertainties in climate forecasts is reasonable. But rejecting or playing down the near-unanimous warnings of experts, which are based on decades of substantial and continually accumulating evidence and suggest vast implications for future generations, should disqualify a nominee from leading an expert agency charged with making science-based decisions. Among scientists there is virtually no dissent from the conclusion that human activity — the burning of fossil fuels, which releases heat-trapping gases that stay in the atmosphere — is leading to planetary warming, and that the coming changes pose severe risks.

No doubt we would disagree with Mr. Pruitt on any number of issues. He is a leading voice against the Clean Power Plan, President Obama’s centerpiece climate policy. Even before his nomination, the New York Times had uncovered extremely close ties between Mr. Pruitt and the oil and gas industry. He has been tapped to run an agency much of whose work he believes should cease.

I'm sure the right's argument will be the settled aspect. There is little doubt, man is influencing the climate with CO2 emissions. But, CH and others who support this guy are basically extending their middle finger at mom earth. Oh well.

KD said...

Now he is appointing Goldman Sachs executive director of budget"

I know, what a great idea taken from Hillary and used .


It is a pure joy to watch the meltdown as the fact HER lost comes to the clouded brains of the progressives .


Progressives are really pissed Trump has so many Generals, but, wait, Trump has the same amount as the Current President.

Anonymous said...


All of a sudden the Democrats are interested in protecting the integrity of the voting process, when for the last 56 years they have been extremely aggressive in their attempts to destroy that integrity.

Obama orders intelligence community review of 2016 election hacking I guess it's okay that half the dead in Chicago and Detroit and Cleveland and Philadelphia and every other blue city have voted for the last two generations, but when they can't quite manage to flip the election to the chosen one...the drunken sociopath with neurological issues...THEN they take it seriously.

"Obama's directive to his intelligence agencies to conduct a full review and report to him before he leaves office on Jan. 20 could serve to fuel more questions about the integrity of the election - at a time when President-elect Donald Trump's advisers and allies are battling with Clinton stalwarts still bitter over the race."

Except....it's not really "election hacking." Why is the federal government investigating a political party's issues? Why is it the government's problem that the Democrats have crappy network security?

I wonder what changed?


http://ace.mu.nu/archives/367293.php

KD, Unemployment Rate will be going up, know why? said...

Had Hillary Clinton won the election, the white working class might have gotten some tangible benefits — a higher minimum wage, overtime pay, paid family and medical leave, more secure health insurance, and so on... " The MUTT

LOL @ the MUTT with me will you.


Last time the Minimum wage was raised was by "W" , 8 years of Obama ,nothing.

Overtime pay is paid when it is earned, get to know the law before looking ever dumber.

Work solves the rest, get a job, save money, build wealth and stop looking for the handouts.



KD said...

"A wise and frugal government ... shall restrain men from injuring one another, shall leave them otherwise free to regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth of labor the bread it has earned. This is the sum of good government."

—Thomas Jefferson (1801) t/h Rrb


opie said...

Why is the federal government investigating a political party's issues? Why is it the government's problem that the Democrats have crappy network security?


I guess trey howdy's investigation were not aimed at political ends and that's righteous to idiots like you, rat.

wphamilton said...

Roger said, "Now he is appointing Goldman Sachs executive director of budget"

Trump's election was flipping a bird at Washington and apparently he's taking that seriously. We're likely in for four years of this - or more - so we might as well just settle in and try to develop a sense of humor about it.

opie said...

Blogger rrb said...

All of a sudden the Democrats are interested in protecting the integrity of the voting process

And suddenly, the right thinks d's should not be questioning any voting process....like voting machines breaking in michigan is fine since they were in black districts. Once again, do anything to win. LOL!!

KD, when does Hillary Conceed the 2016 Race? said...

WP, be honest you did not vote for Hillary and sure as heck , not trump but that leaves the question, who did you support with your vote?

love to hear how that person that did earn your vote would be doing things better and how and with whom?

TY

opie said...

Trump's election was flipping a bird at Washington

LOL....Just trading swamp water from DC to wall street. Yep, we can certainly laugh at the gilded road we are all traveling.

KD said...

.

Four years of cry babying on the left is going to be more fun then I every thought it would be.


Mean while irl, Consumer Confidence SOARS .

That is a good thing.

KD said...

Baby Diaper Pin Excuss 321, why Hillary lost.

d's should not be questioning any voting process....like voting machines breaking in michigan is fine since they were in black districts. "

LOL, oh that is the good stuff, wacko bat shit.

Anonymous said...

And suddenly, the right thinks d's should not be questioning any voting process....
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

no dipshit.

what we're wondering is why, suddenly, D's are finally coming around to questioning it for the first time ever.

right after the D's old tricks which used to work... stopped working.

R's have always been in favor of protecting the sanctity and integrity of the voting process. we are glad to see the D's join us in the effort. even though it is only temporary on their part. that is, until they start winning again.

Anonymous said...


Democrats went into this election convinced that the tide of demographic change was on their side. That tide depends heavily on immigration. If Trump secures the border, deports illegal aliens and revamps immigration to serve national interests, then the Democrats lose their demographic future.

[...]

Democrats have to choose between identity politics and the working class. Abandoning identity politics would be a painful process while abandoning the working class has proven to be painless and disastrous. But identity politics without mass migration and social transformation is unworkable. Immigration determines the future of the Democrats. This election is forcing Democrats to make a choice.


http://sultanknish.blogspot.com/2016/12/immigration-can-kill-democrat-party.html

wphamilton said...

WP who did you support with your vote

For now I'll exercise my right to keep my votes confidential, but you're right that neither Clinton nor Trump received my vote. KD, I identify most with the Libertarian Party.

I think that most of the country is already tired of Hillary Clinton's whining, with only a few idiots at a couple of news publishers still going out of inertia. No one really cares what she thinks any more. I am patient, and I know that the Clinton travails will soon enough be relegated to interesting but trivial coverage.

opie said...

D's are finally coming around to questioning it for the first time ever.

Horse crap asshole. I guess voter ID laws help turn out and were sponsored by d's. No wonder why you flunked out of ag school. LOL

opie said...

country is already tired of Hillary Clinton's whining

I was tired of hearing here scratch voice long ago and I supported her for her environmental, women, and scotus picks.... Other than that, keep the govmt out of my life.

Anonymous said...

I am patient, and I know that the Clinton travails will soon enough be relegated to interesting but trivial coverage.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

perhaps, but attorney general sessions might have other plans.

trump said HE had no interest in going after hillary. the AG has enough independence to pursue what it deems appropriate.

wphamilton said...

I was tired of hearing here scratch voice long ago and I supported her for her environmental, women, and scotus pick

Opie, the Democratic platform was mostly fine IMO. As it turns out, she was the biggest problem that the Democratic Party faced, and that will not be easily forgotten.

Anonymous said...

Blogger Roger Amick said...
President Barack Obama has ordered U.S. intelligence agencies to deliver to him a dossier of the evidence that the Russian government used cyber attacks and other means to intervene in the 2016 election, possibly with the idea of making more information public, a senior intelligence official tells NBC News.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

and it seems like only yesterday...


WASHINGTON — President Obama tied Republican candidates up and down the ballot to GOP presidential candidate Donald Trump on Thursday, rebuking Trump for claiming he'd only accept the result of the November election if he wins.

"This is more than just the usual standard lie," Obama said. "That's no laughing matter.'

Obama said Trump has alleged voter fraud "without a shred of evidence."

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/onpolitics/2016/10/20/obama-trumps-claims-rigged-election-not-usual-standard-lie/92478094/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter




gee, i wish 0linsky would make up his mind...

opie said...

As it turns out, she was the biggest problem

BIGO!!! You win a cookie......:) And yes, me thinks her deplorable comment was equivalent to romneys 47% debacle and probably was the nanosecond she lost the people and election. Its not like trump won in any kind of landslide, he won because he won the mix of states that gave him the win inspite of the popular vote loss. I guess CA's vote is just that a vote for trump. With the D's retaining the same leadership that led them to this point......until they figure that out, they will remain in the abyss of being the minority even having a larger party. Oh well, who am I to criticize what I can't fix.

KD said...

Forget this part of the Obama pipedream legacy..
"Obama: Pulling All U.S. Troops Out of Iraq Was Not 'My Decision'"

Fake news at it's best or worst

Then he said just this week that he was never told ISIS would take ground and hold it.

What a waste he is.

KD, Senate to add Republican today voters speaking out said...

“You know I say what I mean and I mean what I say,” Obama said in Hollywood, Florida on Nov. 4, 2012. “I said I'd end the war in Iraq. I ended it.”

4500 combat troops are currently in Iraq, 1000 are in Syria and he has added combat forces in other contries, he did not get us out, he got the US in deeper.

"This war is lost" Harry Ried , POS Retired

Anonymous said...

Fake news at it's best or worst
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

what i find most ironic about this sudden interest in fake news is that if hypocrisy is liberalism's bedrock, fake news is its lifeblood.

the left can't go 5 minutes without fabricating some mountain of bullshit with which to smear the right.



KD, HB and Krugman both too stupid said...

you mean like the fake news that HB was called out on, repeatedly, the night of the election that the US Markets would drop like a rock, HB supported it with that bs fake news story written by the political Hack Krugman.

opie said...

what i find most ironic about this sudden interest in fake news is that if hypocrisy is liberalism's bedrock, fake news is its lifeblood.

So says out ag dropout who uses breitbart as his main source of news. LOLOOLO

opie said...

"Obama: Pulling All U.S. Troops Out of Iraq Was Not 'My Decision'"

Idiot farmer, that was the busch legacy deal he made with the iraqi's

The U.S.–Iraq Status of Forces Agreement (official name: Agreement Between the United States of America and the Republic of Iraq On the Withdrawal of United States Forces from Iraq and the Organization of Their Activities during Their Temporary Presence in Iraq) was a status of forces agreement (SOFA) between Iraq and the United States, signed by President George W. Bush in 2008. It established that U.S. combat forces would withdraw from Iraqi cities by June 30, 2009, and all U.S. combat forces will be completely out of Iraq by December 31, 2011.

Thanx for playing, idiot.