Pages

Tuesday, January 31, 2017

The next Liberal temper tantrum coming later today !!

Who will it be?  The buzz is that it's down to these two?

Neil Gorsuch of Colorado 
Thomas Hardiman of Pennsylvania

24 comments:

KD, Winning said...

Is everyone else getting very tired of the fake outrage of the Liberals and that little piss ant of a crybaby little chuckless schumer.

It was a big reason Hillary lost, the US Voter did not want more Alt-Leftist pissing on the US Constitution. Obama had done more then enough to it.

Loretta Russo said...

No doubt we'll be hearing from the two-bit community organizer if Trump chooses a "Scalia"

Roger Amick said...

Hardiman, conservative, but not a Scalia clone.

I don't know if the Democrats are going to attempt to use the rules of the Senate to filibuster him.

Roger Amick said...

Gingrich, Giuliani to Chair Trump Super PAC

Newt Gingrich and Rudy Giuliani will lead a group formed to push President Donald Trump’s agenda, Politico reports. The two will be co-chairs on the political nonprofit group Great America Alliance, a pro-Trump super PAC.

"My interest is in communicating the things that he wants to get done," said Gingrich, the former House Speaker.

Great America plans to promote Trump’s agenda includes spending around $80 million on anticipated policy battles in 2017. In a memo, he also said the group could pressure GOP members who opposed Trump’s plans.

rrb said...

The two will be co-chairs on the political nonprofit group Great America Alliance, a pro-Trump super PAC.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

as opposed to the super PAC Hate America Alliance, otherwise known as 0linsky For America, or OFA.

good catch, alky.

opie said...

A new record even busch cannot break. A race to the bottom where only the polls will settle at 33%....the base that is ruining the country. From the LA times

President Trump's actions during his first week in office have appeared to be aimed at the voters who already supported him, not at reaching out to the rest, and that's taken a rapid toll on his support, which was already historically low.

Gallup, which has measured job approval for presidents for decades, shows Trump's approval so far at 45%, with 48% disapproving. That's an average of several days' polling.

The daily trend lines are not kind to the new administration. As of Saturday, 51% of Americans disapproved of Trump's performance.

That's a record for the speed of getting to majority disapproval.

By comparison, President George W. Bush hit majority disapproval six months into his second term, in June 2005, and remained in negative territory for the rest of his tenure.

I'm sure our esteemed host will naturally question the validity of this poll. LOL!!!!!

rrb said...

As of Saturday, 51% of Americans disapproved of Trump's performance.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

well dipshit, considering the fact that he won with 46% of the vote, it looks like he's gaining some converts.

keeping election promises will do that to a guy.

Myballs said...

Why don't you show us Rasmussen's poll?

Loretta Russo said...

"A national Quinnipiac university poll released today says American voters support, 48 - 42 percent, "suspending immigration from 'terror prone' regions, even if it means turning away refugees from those regions."

https://poll.qu.edu/national/release-detail?ReleaseID=2423

KD said...

I don't know if the Democrats are going to attempt to use the rules of the Senate to filibuster him. " ACLU Barbie

Yes , they have already announced it, little crying schummer stated that your team is going to resist any USSC nominee that is not a main stream (by schummer standards, mean left wing fuck nut case).

By mid-night tonight no matter who it is that President Donald Trump picks , he/she will be attacked by the left as the worse human on earth.

bet on it.



on the better vetting of wantabee AMERICANS, let me see, over 6,000 Muslims have been allowed to enter the USA since the better vetting plan has been lawfully put in place, yet, how can that be IF we listen and believe the leftist , this is a MUSLIM Travel to the USA BAN.

Not a very good ban, since we are still letting Muslims in, or did the left just get caught again in a lie.

rrb said...

Lawyers for Hillary Clinton today announced that they are initiating legal action against Satan for breach of contract.

They are demanding that he return the soul of Hillary Clinton who was promised the highest office in the land for her soul.

Satan's representative, George Soros, declared that the promise was made in New York City and that she will have to settle for mayor - which is the highest office in New York City.

http://thepeoplescube.com/peoples-blog/hillary-sues-satan-wants-her-soul-back-t19235.html

KD< IF only she won said...

Funny

C.H. Truth said...

We could have predicted on November 9th what the left was going to say about Donald Trump's Supreme Court Nominee. There will be nothing of substance argued by the left.

Just the same old rhetoric, that the majority of the Country does not agree with.

Loretta Russo said...

LOL

rrb said...

We could have predicted on November 9th what the left was going to say about Donald Trump's Supreme Court Nominee. There will be nothing of substance argued by the left.
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

indeed.

we are certain the nominee, err, MONSTER, is an anti-LGTBQWERTY, second coming of hitler, fascist, islamophobe, kleptomaniac who eats live kittens and farts on crowded elevators.




rrb said...

There will be nothing of substance argued by the left.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

is there ever?

KD, Dems pledge to fight who ever is picked said...

Madam Warren attempted to block a vote over in the US Senate Hearings, she was steam rolled , she then called the Hearings "A Travisty".

A really nice guy from all account Senator Orin Hatch from Utah a good God Fearing man , had met his breaking point and said the Senate Dems where acting like "Idiots", he is right they are, but, when a guy as nice is this is push too far, well you know the Dems have over reached.


Trump will use the "New Nuke Option" IF need be to get his Pick on the Bench, and the Dems can say not a thing that matters.

KD, Dem pre-emptive hate for USSC Nominee said...

is there ever?" RRB

Want to know when you can see that money matters to the left , even tho they tell us it is evil.

What until Madam Clinton and Warren and that other gal what is her name, oh, yeah, Schummer are allowed to claim a lower tax rate, they will vote against it or make public they don't like it and then they will take the lower rate , pocket the money and cement their Hypocrisy on one more issue.

Just like UCLA Barbie will and OPIUM

Question what happen to fake pastor James, he was sure Hillary was going to win Biggly.

rrb said...



here's how trump gets messico to pay for the wall:


The Mexican central bank tracks how much money Mexicans abroad send home and in 2016 it was $25 billion, almost all of it from Mexicans in the United States and much of it from Mexicans in the United States illegally. That remittance cash accounts for more foreign exchange than Mexican oil exports. The remittance income is rising. It was nearly $22 billion in 2013 and is expected to rise to $28 billion in 2017, unless the United States enforces its immigration laws like Mexico does. Mexico has for decades tolerated illegal migration to the United States because the corruption and bad government in Mexico did little to provide jobs for the growing number of unemployed Mexicans and created a lot of potentially troublesome young men and women. Tolerating and, for many Mexican politicians, openly supporting the illegal migrants, was a popular policy and the government came to regard it as a right. But it was also about money and the remittances created a huge source of foreign currency flowing back to Mexico.


https://strategypage.com/qnd/mexico/articles/20170131.aspx


yeah, $25 BILLION oughta cover it.


rrb said...


We don’t know yet who President Trump’s Supreme Court nominee will be, but we can be fairly certain that, irrespective of the evidence, Senate Democrats will denounce the nominee:

– for supposedly not having shown “a sufficient commitment to the core constitutional values at the heart of our democracy”;

– for having a record that “raise[s] troubling questions about the depth of his commitment to the role of the Supreme Court and Congress in protecting individual rights and liberties under the Constitution”;

– for having a “particularly troubling” record on civil rights and for making “reactionary arguments”;

– for not being “genuinely concerned about the rights of women”;

– for “alarming” views on Roe v. Wade; and

– for working “to turn back the clock on the historic progress of recent decades.”

These specific charges, as it happens, were all leveled by Senator Ted Kennedy against … David Souter in 1990.

http://www.nationalreview.com/bench-memos/444404/senate-democrats-supreme-court-nominee

Commonsense said...

And Souter turned out to be the best manchurian candidate they ever had.

One thing about Democrats, they nominate ideological hardliners and manage to roll the Republicans to put them on the court.

You never see a Democrat court appointment go to the right. Ever.

However, you have seen Republican "moderate" appointees like Kennedy and Roberts drift to the left.

Commonsense said...

Jerry Brown is going to become the 21st century version of George Wallace; "Sanctuary now, sanctuary tommorrow, sanctuary forever!!!!

opie said...

rrb said...

here's how trump gets messico to pay for the wall:

The pocket of the US taxpayer, like you. You are gonna love being screwed, rat. LOL

KD, "Resist we mus't said...

yeah, $25 BILLION oughta cover it."

Yes

The trade imbalance over ever year under Obama was -55 Billion for the USA, just imagine IF Obama could have had time to read the art of the Deal, get that to say par between the USA and Mexico.

What could the people of the USA buy with 440 Billion USD.

HB is hard at work, I know he is, because IF I know one thing about him it is his honesty on issues that he brings to this blog. He promised over two weeks ago to tell us all how US Manufacturing is a Negative to the pocket books and purses of us that still work in the USA. Honest hard working HB's topic point was that IF we make more here it will cost too much for the average person to afford. He is also working on a list of basic items that would be too expensive to buy, thus lowering the standard of living of most Americans.

He prides himself on being the brightest person to post a thought here, so let's all encourage him to shine.