Pages

Thursday, April 6, 2017

Nutshell

When it comes to the Susan Rice story, the liberal media would have you believe that this actual news is just a distraction to make you stop focusing on the collusion theories that are completely without evidence.

In other words, they are upset that real news is interfering with the fake news they want to push.

15 comments:

rrb said...

In other words, they are upset that real news is interfering with the fake news they want to push.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


case in point -

cnn won't touch the susan rice story with a 10 foot pole, but they are out there insisting that rachel dolezal really is black.

opie said...

Yes, this is another attempt of the donnie trying to change the subject. His accusation of a crime is no different than obama being born in Kenya. She had every right to see the names as she is the head of security council and in order to do her job, needs all the data to determine if actions are required. I seriously doubt she leaked the names as trump is alleging. Where is his proof of millions of illegal votes, he was wiretapped, crowds were HUUUGE for the inauguration. Another example of him being the fabricatot of fake news. Another example of his lack of credibility.....

Commonsense said...

Nope, this is why she will eventually go to jail.

Those familiar with the way she went about collecting information on her boss’ political enemies know that she and Mr. Rhodes were running an unprecedented effort to politically weaponize the powerful tools put into the hands of the government to fight terrorism and turn them on those with whom they disagree.

rrb said...

She had every right to see the names as she is the head of security council
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


FALSE.

she had to have a reason. a good reason. and simply being security advisor to a political hack is not a good enough reason.

opie said...

FALSE.

she had to have a reason. a good reason

Yer an idiot... the thresh hold is a need to know, which she does by virtue of her position. and the only hack here is you being an abject dunce, again

opie said...

Commonsense said...
Nope, this is why she will eventually go to jail.

No, she is not going to jail based on your interpretation of something you stole from the wash. times without attribution. .....

rrb said...

the thresh hold is a need to know
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


her position was political. not investigatory. therefore, all she could do was REQUEST, not demand, by virtue of the nature of the office that she held. she had no RIGHT to the data. she had to make a case. a strong case, to the investigatory agency in question. and they held the power to DENY her request.



you really are something. you show up here day after day without the first fucking clue as to what you're talking about, and like the alky, you demand to be taken seriously.



rrb said...



The dissemination of any information about U.S. persons is expressly prohibited unless it is necessary to understand foreign intelligence or assess its importance; is evidence of a crime, or indicates a threat of death or serious bodily harm.

https://fas.org/irp/news/2013/06/nsa-sect702.pdf

in other words, rice had no de facto authority. she had to make a case, and a strong one. and even then it was her responsibility to ensure that the data remain secret.

opie said...

in other words, rice had no de facto authority.

And you are no expert in reading anything...She did not disclose the information out side of her work which she had a need to know. You are dumber than loretta!!! You have no proof other than trump saying she committed a crime, another distraction he is making.

rrb said...

She did not disclose the information out side of her work which she had a need to know.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

prove it.

how did david ignatius at the WaPo end up with flynn's name and subsequent story?

somebody had to leak it, and rice is a very plausible suspect. a "person of interest" as law enforcement likes to say. she's a known liar, and a pathological one at that. anyone with an IQ at room temperature or above would be wise to start with her as the logical first suspect in getting to the bottom of the leaks.

opie said...

prove it.

And you can prove she did??? Yer dumber than I thought. Plausible is about as credible as your lack of a brain.

Commonsense said...

Opie sure likes to be beaten like a rented mule.

Bet he's signed up on all those S&M sites. ☺

PNC said...

Like with the "wiretapping" accusation, which predictably turned about to be a load of pure bullshit, Trump has presented zero evidence that Rice had anything to do with leaking anything.

However, it's also more than a mere distraction. To understand what's going on requires insights from studying the psychology of narcissistic sociopaths.

Narcissistic sociopaths are not content with simply doing sick, criminal, malicious things. They also want to see these acts recognized, and see the public shaken and recoiling at their malevolent genius.

But they know they can't just proclaim what they're doing. That would have consequences, as sick, criminal, and malicious acts tend to carry punishments.

But somehow they have to brag about it to the public. And the way they do that, is to accuse someone else of doing what they've done. They get the satisfaction of everyone knowing what they pulled off, while facing none of the consequences.

This activity is commonly referred to as "projection.". With Trump's actions it's practically a rule of thumb.

Projection is what Trump has already done multiple times, in his corporate life, on the campaign trail, and in office. Accuse people of sending manufacturing jobs overseas, while his companies manufacture his signature products overseas. Criticize Presidents for going on vacation and golfing, then spend nearly every weekend of your first two months in office vacationing and playing golf.

The rule of thumb is this: If Trump accuses someone of something, you can be sure he's doing it himself. This rule has shown predictive power multiple times.

Once again this is confirmed in the Susan Rice nonstory: Trump accused Rice of "unmasking" people in his administration, but today it comes out that Trump's administration has been working to "unmask" Twitter users who criticize him.

Smart, informed people will apply this rule to whatever accusations Trump makes next, and for the rest of his term.

PNC said...

And Nunes has recused himself. Even he can see that he (and his inanely pro-Trump line) has lost all credibility in this investigation.

C.H. Truth said...

Nunes exits.
Gowdy steps in.

Upgrade in my opinion.