Pages

Saturday, June 17, 2017

New Disclaimer now officially posted on sidebar

Disclaimer for dummies

There is no regular ongoing comment moderation of any sort for this blog. No ongoing monitoring is done by Blogger, the blog administrator, the ACLU, homeland security, KGB, Boy Scouts of America, mall security, or any other organization. Providing your own personal information online is your own damned stupidity and you (and you alone) are responsible for how others use it.

If you have an issue with the comment threads then feel free to go away. Commenting is an optional choice and done at your own peril. Otherwise send any complaints to the following Email Address: nobobycares@growup.com

65 comments:

Curious James said...

LOL But why did you not mention your putting up a picture of a blogger without his permission, a clear violation of blogging rules? And how do you presume to tell the ACLU whom they may or may not monitor?

KD, James do not fail in your duty to post YOUR LETTER. No LIE, DO IT SISSY BITCH said...

A letter will be going to the ACLU.
But it will be published here too.
I'm not going to do anything behind
Ch's back (though he was warned).


June 17, 2017 at 9:21 AM"

Waiting for your letter to be sent to the ACLU and posted here.

When will the letter be posted here so we can all LOL @ James???

KD, Cleaning my Guns today, just in case said...

another hour gone and no posted letter by James, what is the delay?


President Trump took yet another dump on Obama's face

Loretta said...

Child.

Indy Voter said...

This is not what is written on the sidebar.

Loretta said...

CH!

You have the patience of a saint, lol.

KD, Jane- got letter? said...

Ette, how did you do thru last nights freaking ass Storm.

To think that MAN has altered the climate is to give us mere ants too much credit.

I for one can not wait to read first the letter James is writing to the ACLU, I hope he includes my moniker, I want to be part of any action James brings upon this blog.

Loretta said...

Storms were pretty intense, but all is well.

Mr R keeps the trees trimmed. We have a greenhouse (which provides us with energy) so we need the sun across the back of the house.

More storms tonight, equals more rainwater in the water barrels. We use it to water the grass, or top off the pool.

Hope all is well in your neck of the woods. Your weather is always worse than ours.

KD, Mueller highers Hillary Campain Lawyer, Great stuff said...

All is well here even thou a 2nd round rumbled thru damaging trees all over my properties. Lucky nothing done to our home or out buildings.


When will the letter be posted here so we can all LOL @ James???


Nothing yet, how come, he sounded so sure he had it all ready written and ready to post here.

President Trump is doing a fine job Poll up to 50 percent approval.

That has got the left yelling.

Thing is HE continues to move his agenda forward , mostly with out the Demicans. The SWAMP has had a few good days, but the Mueller leak feast is really hurting that witch hunt.

KD, Jane took off her high heals and ran off said...

I can not be the only one that finds this laughable, really, some moniker on the net is upset that s/he has some stuff said about her/him.

"I'm not going to do anything behind
Ch's back (though he was warned)."

Exactly , what was that warning, what are you going to do about it, since your bluff has been called?

Be sure , you sissy skirt wearing nanci-boy , to add my moniker to your letter to the ACLU, I would love to hear from them, in person would be ever better.

Commonsense said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Commonsense said...

Curious James said...
LOL But why did you not mention your putting up a picture of a blogger without his permission


You know you're the dummy right?

It impossible to imbed a picture in the comments section of this blog the best you can do is post a link.

And in order for it to be embedded or posted it has to be on the internet. The very fact it's on the internet means it's public domain.

I would like you to provide specific examples of a poster posting your picture or link. (Name, date, thread, etc)

Because the only incident I can recall of an unauthorized posting was when Roger posted my facebook profile without my permission and called me a liar.

I got over it. Maybe you should too.

Good ole gentle truth-seeking James said...

It impossible to imbed a picture in the comments section of this blog the best you can do is post a link.
_______________________

True. So I will let Ch explain to you how he posted it.

Loretta said...

Stupid obnoxious James Boswell trolling

Loretta said...

"I would like you to provide specific examples of a poster posting your picture or link. (Name, date, thread, etc)"

The stupid, obnoxious bitch can't because it never happened.

^Because the only incident I can recall of an unauthorized posting was when Roger posted my facebook profile without my permission and called me a liar."

Exactly

"I got over it. Maybe you should too."

You're not a bitter, vindictive OLD man who is possessed by demons. Boswell sold his soul a long time ago.

He's nothing. Empty.

Good ole gentle truth-seeking James said...

Good ole gentle truth-seeking James said...

COMMONSENSE SAID
It impossible to imbed a picture in the comments section of this blog the best you can do is post a link.
_______________________

JAMES SAID
True. So I will let Ch explain to you how he posted it.

Good ole gentle truth-seeking James said...

Ch is an adult. He does not need help from "Loretta."

Loretta said...

Obnoxious lying James Boswell.

Loretta said...

You'd better get some help.

You're going to need it bitch.

Good ole gentle truth-seeking James said...

Ch says he discourages "excessive profanity" and "threats."

Good ole gentle truth-seeking James said...

Ch also says he discourages "personal attacks."

Loretta said...

Follow the rules bitch.

Good ole gentle truth-seeking James said...

Isn't "bitch" both profanity and personal attack?
And doesn't calling someone that go against teachings of Jesus too?

Good ole gentle truth-seeking Janes said... said...

CHT discourages:

reprinting other people's opinion (C&P)
excessive linking of other websites


"bitch is not excessive profanity but rather descriptive and singular

Also following only some rules while breaking others is not the behavior appropriate for a real pastor.

Loretta said...

I'll let these folks tell me if James Boswell's words and actions are in keeping with their doctrine....

http://disciples.org/general-ministries/

Good ole gentle truth-seeking James said...

LOL LOL LOL
'Loretta' better not let "these folks" see this blog -- the way she looks on it.

Loretta said...

Doesn't matter how I look,

I'm not a "pastor" representing the Disciples of Christ.

Commonsense said...

James since you refuse to give specific examples I can only conclude that you are lying.

No surprise there.

James said...

Commonsense, if I am specifically lying about my picture specifically being posted on this blog by Ch, why doesn't Ch come right out and say so?

---Look, Commonsense, you and Ch and all the others maybe don't get what's really going on here with me. I am about as happy as I can be these days. I have had health issues, but they are now much improved. I am serving in one of the most rewarding, grateful congregational situations I have experienced in a long time. It's a truly rewarding, happy, fulfilling ministry.

Don't get the idea that I give (as Rat would put it) a Rat's patookey if people want to show their malevolence by calling me a pedophile or pederast. I have served two churches that had day care centers, one of which I am serving now. No church with a day care center would allow a pastor to serve if he/she had the lest whiff of a record of child abuse.

However, Loretta (aka Savagette) long ago put up my true identity and a past church employer on this blog.
(I could put yours up, Common, if I wanted to stoop that low, but I never have.)

And although her putting up my identity has never caused me any harm (because no self-respecting church people would pay attention to the hateful negative name calling that goes on here), it is not inconceivable that when/if she puts up my present location it might somehow cause me some professional or financial harm (though I doubt it). Still, I have warned Ch that he should strongly consider stepping up like a gentleman and tell everyone that calling me by those designations is a bridge too far, and demand that they stop it.

He has not done that. Whether the ACLU or some other organization might find that interesting I/we may be finding out. I'm in no hurry. I'm intensely happy these days.

Anyway, when I am good and ready, I can take whatever action I choose to take.
Or not take. Stay tuned.
--Good ole patience-of-Job, gentle James

C.H. Truth said...

Ch that he should strongly consider stepping up like a gentleman and tell everyone that calling me by those designations is a bridge too far, and demand that they stop it.

I set all sorts of guidelines, James. Do you follow them?

Of course not. You ignore what you want to ignore (because it doesn't bother you) and expect everyone else to follow what "you" feel is important "to you".

Of course... isn't that the same way you follow the Bible. Pick and choose what to follow and what to ignore, depending on what does and doesn't suit your personal desires and personal feelings.

Hypocrisy James. Why should the person who won't follow the guidelines feel justified in complaining about others not following them?

C.H. Truth said...

Here are your steps, James.

You are suggesting that false statements are being made against you that have caused you tangible harm (which would be considered Libel). Generally this is handled as a civil case, rather than as a criminal case.

BTW... the blog owners are never held personally liable, so you cannot sue Blogger (or me as the administrator). You can only sue the actual individuals who made the statements.

- So your first step would be to hire an attorney. The ACLU is not going to provide you with free legal service for this.
- You would then have to identify the statements being made.
- You would then have to prove that these statements are false.
- You would then have to prove that those statements have caused you tangible harm. (Not just that it hurts your feelings, but that those statements literally hurt your business or prevented you from getting a job - Potential harm doesn't count).

- Then you would have to go to the blog owner (blogger.com) and see if they have the ability to actually identify the anonymous users who have been commenting. (I don't own this blog, and do not have the ability to identify anyone). They may or may not have this ability.
- Blogger will not likely provide you with anything without a court order, and the ability of people to post and comment anonymously is important to their business
- So you would generally need a court order to get them to provide you with the people in question. To get the court order, you would need to prove that all statements are untrue, and that they caused you tangible harm.

So... good luck to you.

Loretta said...

He's bat shit insane, and dangerous.

Loretta said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Commonsense said...

This should fix the sidebar.

Loretta said...

"it is not inconceivable that when/if she puts up my present location"

You've already bragged about your supposed gig.

Fair minded James said...

I only now saw and read this.

Ch, I specifically said that nothing that has ever yet been posted about me here has actually harmed me. None of my church members would for a moment believe that I am a child abuser.

But if I ever should be caused harm, there might be legal action.

Meanwhile you might choose to protect yourself by warning bloggers who make legally provable slanderous and libelous statements about me (remember, I have undergone numerous background checks) will here be blocked. Or you could simply request that they desist from that.

But you can do whatever you choose to do.

Loretta said...

Supplying links to...

http://disciples.org/general-ministries/

...shouldn't be a problem.

James said...

Links to...shouldn't be a problem.

Yes indeed. Good idea. Go right ahead. I think they will be very interested in one of their pastors-in-good-standing being called a child abuser. They too might be interested in taking legal action.

James said...

:-)

C.H. Truth said...

Meanwhile you might choose to protect yourself

Maybe you should stop making threats.

James said...

Just let financial or professional harm come to me because of something said here -- and we will revisit that.

KD, SUE ME JANE< Bring it the FUCK ON BOY said...

Jane, that is a fine white flag of defeat you have flying over your home.


Never ever make a threat you are unable to fulfill."

OMG, Double Dumb Jane,. revisit?,,, when did you first "visit".

what a coward, aka Perfect Nanci-boy Liberal.

**** Important Notice *** said...


James's lawyer here.

Hey I am about to file a cease and resist order against you all so please mail to the address that james himself posted here before, your home addresses and screen alias(s). He was just not being himself and in his heart he really did not post his address here so after mailing your responses please forget it. He really is just a coward so please ignore any threats, real or veiled, and excuse him for trying to enforce some rules while excessively and blatantly abusing others. Like the past failed president Obama, he is just acting like a cowardly king and in his heart he feels he is right, even if he is wrong. He intends to stand before God with that excuse also and is apparently trying to lead others down that same path so he will not stand alone. For the record I will not represent him there.

Yeah he is a scumbag but did he tell you he is making more money than he has in a long time and gets to work alone with children ?

Look forward to all your support and letters,

James's lawyer
Dewey, Cheatem & Howe

KD, Oil Jobs pay very well said...

Funny stuff, Jane is the blog joke.

I see that the US Oil Producers have add 6 more active rigs for drilling, it has spiked since President trump cancelled many rules Obama penned.

Loretta said...

LOL. Obnoxious psycho.

Loretta said...

Doubtful.

Loretta said...

LOL

Good ole gentle truth-seeking James said...

COMMONSENSE:
James since you refuse to give specific examples I can only conclude that you are lying.

No surprise there.
June 18, 2017 at 3:53 PM

James said...
Commonsense, if I am specifically lying about my picture specifically being posted on this blog by Ch,* why doesn't Ch come right out and say so?

---Look, Commonsense, you and Ch and all the others maybe don't get what's really going on here with me. I am about as happy as I can be these days. I have had health issues, but they are now much improved. I am serving in one of the most rewarding, grateful congregational situations I have experienced in a long time. It's a truly rewarding, happy, fulfilling ministry.

Don't get the idea that I give (as Rat would put it) a Rat's patookey if people want to show their malevolence by calling me a pedophile or pederast. I have served two churches that had day care centers, one of which I am serving now. No church with a day care center would allow a pastor to serve if he/she had the lest whiff of a record of child abuse.

However, Loretta (aka Savagette) long ago put up my true identity and a past church employer on this blog.
(I could put yours up, Common, if I wanted to stoop that low, but I never have.)

And although her putting up my identity has never caused me any harm (because no self-respecting church people would pay attention to the hateful negative name calling that goes on here), it is not inconceivable that when/if she puts up my present location it might somehow cause me some professional or financial harm (though I doubt it). Still, I have warned Ch that he should strongly consider stepping up like a gentleman and telling everyone that calling me by those designations is a bridge too far, and demand that they stop it.

He has not done that. WHETHER THE ACLU OR SOME OTHER ORGANIZATION MIGHT FIND THAT INTERESTING I/WE MAY BE FINDING OUT. I'm in no hurry. I'm intensely happy these days.

Anyway, when I am good and ready, I can take whatever action I choose to take.
Or not take. Stay tuned.
--Good ole patience-of-Job, gentle James

*BTW, a practice specifically condemned by bloger.com.

Anonymous said...

"I'm intensely happy these days." we get it, you get to work alone with little children, many here find that disgusting, especially with what anonymous sources are saying about you.

If you claim your picture can, and has been posted here feel free to prove it and post any picture here, else shut the fuck up. You have made many false claims in the past and we are getting very tired of it.

If I was to believe anything you post I would report you to authorities just from what I have read from your own postings, but like I'm sure many do I spit on the ground when I see your name as a poster and you carry no weight. I also realize no one can be as stupid as you appear and you are just trying to rile people up.

What a waste of time and oxygen you are

Commonsense said...

Commonsense, if I am specifically lying about my picture specifically being posted on this blog by Ch,* why doesn't Ch come right out and say so?

Because it's up to you to prove your accusation not the other way around.

And if there is truth to it, you should easily relate the specifics of your charge.

The fact that you are deliberately dodging the question convinces me all the more that you are lying.

Good old James said...

LOL If Ch had never posted my picture he would say so. In doing that he broke a major rule of being a blogging administrator.

Commonsense said...

Well he wouldn't for the same reason as was previously posted:

"What a waste of time and oxygen you are"

However, I do have some time and oxygen to waste and I demand proof of your accusation.

Otherwise, be forever tarred as a liar and no amount of lawyering you buy will change that.

Bearer of all things truthful said...

Does James want the Bearer of all things truthful to show what he commented about himself on December 3rd 2012 on his facebook profile picture?

C.H. Truth said...

Here is the incriminating post James is referring to!

http://coldheartedtruthblog.blogspot.com/2016/06/incriminating-post.html

Commonsense said...

LOL. now I can believe that is James.

**** WE NEED YOUR HELP **** said...

James's lawyer here.

Now that CHT has produced the photographic image in question (see above) I believe we have a much stronger case. As a reminder this is what we previously required from blog participants prior to a court order which we feel is imminent:

Hey I am about to file a cease and resist order against you all so please mail to the address that james himself posted here before, your home addresses and screen alias(s). He was just not being himself and in his heart he really did not post his address here so after mailing your responses please forget it. He really is just a coward so please ignore any threats, real or veiled, and excuse him for trying to enforce some rules while excessively and blatantly abusing others. Like the past failed president Obama, he is just acting like a cowardly king and in his heart he feels he is right, even if he is wrong. He intends to stand before God with that excuse also and is apparently trying to lead others down that same path so he will not stand alone. For the record I will not represent him there.

Yeah he is a scumbag but did he tell you he is making more money than he has in a long time and gets to work alone with children ?

Look forward to all your support and letters,

James's lawyer
Dewey, Cheatem & Howe

James said...

12:56 PM.
LOL Mighty weak, Ch. More damaging to your reputation than to mine. :=)

But I can understand why you have difficulty explaining why, against one of the basic rules of blogger.com, you broke the rule that under no circumstances is the picture of a blogger to be published without his or her permission.

James said...

And I repeat:
June 19, 10:42 AM :-)

Good old James said...

And I repeat.

KD, Godless Mindless Stupid Uncle Bernie Sanders, bad Socialist said...

Jane, you got your stupid ass handed to you by myself and others as we collectively called your bluff.

I do have to say your white flag fly's well over your liberal theftdom.

this is so good

"According to the news outlet Seven Days, Sanders' wife, Jane O'Meara Sanders, is under investigation for obtaining a loan in 2010 to purchase a piece of land owned by the Roman Catholic Diocese of Burlington church for Burlington College, which she was the president of from 2004 to 2011. She has been accused of "inflating the number of fundraising commitments she had" in order to obtain the loan, as she had claimed that the college had $2.6 million in loans pledged; that number $676,000.

Burlington's default resulted in the church losing "between $1.6 million and $2 million" since it "financed a portion of the sale." Burlington itself officially shut down in May 2016 due to the massive amount of debt it was facing."

Cheating the church to self in-rich. omg good.

Good ole thoughtful truth seeking James said...

Ch has never explained why, against one of the MOST BASIC RULES of blogger.com, he broke the rule that under no circumstances is the picture of a blogger to be published without his or her permission, by posting mine without my permission.

Until he adequately explains that, I guess I should be allowed to continue to post what are for the most part pretty brief cut and pastes, for they add greatly to the dearth of actual information made available here.

Note that, in accord with Ch's stated encouragements, I do little name calling, little insulting, no blaspheming, and I avoid profanity.

Ch Truth said...

Comment etiquette
Coldheartedtruth allows for real time comments from anyone (including anonymous users). For sake of open discussion, these comments are not moderated.

CHT encourages:
- ongoing on topic discussions regarding the post in question
- critical analysis and disagreement
- open back and forth between regular users

CHT discourages:
- reprinting other people's opinion (C&P)
- excessive linking of other websites
- excessive profanity
- threats

Get over it said...

or leave.

Amused, James said...

TODAY, 4:55 pm EDT
Opposition to GOP Health Care Bill Grows

“Senate Republican leaders scrambled Sunday to rally support for their health care bill even as opposition continued to build outside Congress and two Republican senators questioned whether the bill would be approved this week,” the New York Times reports.

“Senate Republican leaders were trying to lock down Republican votes by funneling money to red states, engineering a special deal for Alaska and arguing that they could insure more people at a lower cost than the House, which passed a repeal bill last month. But the forces arrayed against the Republican push to dismantle President Barack Obama’s signature domestic achievement are formidable.”

Washington Post: “At least five Republicans have already come out against their party’s bill — which can only afford to lose two votes — and over the weekend more began expressing serious reservations and skepticism about the proposal, saying they would like more time to debate and tweak the plan.”

Mike Allen: “At least 10 Republican senators have expressed reservations, and the White House and GOP leaders can only lose two. That’s why our handicappers have suddenly gone from ‘more likely than not’ to ‘coin flip.'”
_______________
Gosh, who would have thought health care could be so complicated?

james's dad said...

UMMM if you are going to spam I get to use excessive profanity... see how that works?

Fairs fair