It's at least as credible as Trump's tweet that the man doesn't exist.
As if Trump had some specific knowledge of everything that happened to Stormy Daniels in Las Vegas. Which maybe he did ... if his lawyers had hired a goon to keep track of her ... which would kind of lend credence to her story, wouldn't it?
"Internet lawyers" should be taken with a grain of salt.
You continue to own all content and information, including photos, that you post on Facebook. You grant Facebook non-exclusive transferable license to use it. So it is absolutely INCORRECT that "you no longer own it".
It may be true that you can expect other people to use whatever you've posted, including photos, but you do retain rights and control to it.
Personally IANAL, if I wanted a site to remove an unauthorized photo of myself, I'd send them a DMCA take-down notice. You can use a form from the DMCA site (IANAL) although just sending a registered letter carries enough threat.
Not that you should IMHO, if you have voluntarily uploaded a photo or similar photos to the offending site already. Just sayin' a notice is more effective than carping in blog post. Take it in good nature, as it is apparently intended.
Looks like Temporary and Illegitimate Nazi President got the Limees and Frogs to join him in damaging the Chemical facilities of Syria.
Putin a small bit player with a low grade economy was put in his place. Putin promise to sink US Wares hips IF they attacked. Klienminded applauded Vaddy. Going so far as to side with mother Russia in any nuke exchange.
Blogger rrb said...and blacks are demanding free coffee as reparations.
I saw that story, where the conservative vlogger (who is black) demanded and received his free Starbucks coffee. "I heard you were prejudiced, so I came for my reparations free coffee."
I think you should try a variation of that, as a stunt/social experiment/political point. I presume that you're a mature Caucasian male. "I hear you all were prejudiced, so I came in for my white privilege free coffee."
bryan sharpe may think it is funny. Kansas what he did is a crime.
21-5801. Theft. (a) Theft is any of the following acts done with intent to permanently deprive the owner of the possession, use or benefit of the owner's property or services:
(1) Obtaining or exerting unauthorized control over property or services;
(2) obtaining control over property or services, by deception;
by JOEL B. POLLAK 18 Apr 2018 7,006 Fresno State University professor Randa Jarrar tweeted on Tuesday that former First Lady Barbara Bush “was a generous and smart and amazing racist who, along with her husband, raised a war criminal.” She added: “Fuck outta here with your nice words.”
Ted Cruz vs O'Rourke is within the margin of error in Texas? Wow, that doesn't look good.
I still don't think Cruz has much to worry about though. Just political instinct ... because I think that voters are lying when they say that supporting or opposing Trump won't be a factor. I think they don't want to admit it out loud, but in the privacy of the booth they're going to want Cruz, to support President Trump.
WP once you grant facebook a non-exclusive transferable license to use it then you lost control of how it is used, and you have no legal recourse to say where and when it is used. In every legal and usual sense you cease to own it.
Your argument over semantics is tiresome and unnecessary.
If you were stupid enough to contribute to the Trump campaign? He used a lot of your money to pay his own personal legal fees.
The law firm representing Michael Cohen — which this week fought in court to shield communications between Cohen and President Trump from government investigators — has received payments from President Trump’s re-election campaign.
The payments to the law firm by Trump’s campaign could ultimately complicate any efforts by Robert Mueller’s team to win Cohen’s cooperation in the Russia investigation.
The arrangement could also violate campaign finance laws, if the Trump campaign’s payments cover legal work on the federal probe into Cohen’s financial dealings being conducted by prosecutors with the US Attorney’s office in Manhattan.
Trump’s 2020 campaign paid over $214,000 to McDermott, Will and Emory during the last three months of 2017, FEC records show. The campaign paid the firm an additional $13,000-plus in the first three months of this year.
Internet "lawyer" would say "WP once you grant facebook a non-exclusive transferable license to use it then you lost control of how it is used, and you have no legal recourse to say where and when it is used"
The pictures are not taken from Facebook. They have all been downloaded (by Roger) at one time or the other onto this particular website for the numerous posts where he believes people want to see him.
All previous photos downloaded to posts are stored on blogger for future use.
If there even was such as thing as an "internet lawyer" I am sure he would say that I have the rights to re-post pictures that were previously posted by Roger on a blog that I allowed him to post to.
CH that would actually depend on the terms of service that he agrees to when uploading the images. Absent any terms transferring rights, technically he could claim copyright and demand that you remove them, even though he uploaded them himself. He won't have any enforceable privacy concerns though, or anything like that.
Blogspot.com TOS doesn't count, unless the TOS is easy to find from your blog. It's all a moot point however, because no lawsuit on something like this is ever going to achieve more than taking the photo down, while on the other hand no site owner with any sense is going to mess with fighting a DCMA takedown order, because it will shut the site down and subject the site owner to penalties. It is therefore, IANAL, completely and utterly pointless to talk about legal rights, privacy, damages etc. If someone wants his picture off, the takedown notice does that. A lawsuit won't, threats won't do it, there are no potential damages.
It just bugs me when someone is irresponsibly spouting off "legal" pronouncements at someone else that has a problem, and it's obvious that he doesn't have a clue, but someone taking him seriously might be harmed.
I'm not arguing with you, because it's irrelevant to the party with an interest.
For those who don't recognize the acronym, IANAL means "I am not a lawyer". It is a shorthand way of saying, this is not legal advice and should not be construed as such. If you take action based on this personal opinion, you are doing so at your own risk.
That said, Roger, I made a living for a decade with an internet site, under my sole administration and control, and utilizing other internet sites, involving creating and publishing thousands of photos, design and text copy (my own property) monthly. I have dealt with IP on a professional basis during that time, and subsequently for corporate entities, and I have direct experience with DMCA and have needed to respond to DMCA notices. I have dealt personally with all of the legal concerns, including those necessary for an internet based business and also inside the courtroom. So you can take my opinion for what it is, or listen to random ignorance from blog commentary. It's entirely up to you. (IANAL)
And Coldheart, why don't you take his picture down since he asked you to? Whether or not you think he has any rights regarding it, it's still a dick move after he's complained.
If you don't want him posting here, try asking him. He just might stop. Hell, I would.
Take rrb's fat ass off the top and I will get you more hits.
heh. you couldn't draw flies over there with your incessant page-long copy/pastes.
and never forget that the reason we're on THIS blog is because you completely destroyed the other blog.
lest you forget, alky...
Editor's Note:
The views of Roger Amick are in no way endorsed or supported by me, and should not be considered representative of either the historical or current Coldheartedtruth blog.
It's not for you; if someone gets nailed for a copyright violation and sues you for your bad legal advice, I don't care. It's so it can't happen to me.
2. I'm not worried about being sued. If anyone procedes based on an internet blog post without hiring an actual lawyer then they get what they deserve.
But for your education this would be what it take to sue me.
1. I would have had to misrepresent myself as an actual practicing lawyer.
2. I would actually have to accept payment for legal services rendered.
You assumption that someone can sue because he took advice from an internet blog post is pure fiction.
59 comments:
LMAO.
That is funny.
It's at least as credible as Trump's tweet that the man doesn't exist.
As if Trump had some specific knowledge of everything that happened to Stormy Daniels in Las Vegas. Which maybe he did ... if his lawyers had hired a goon to keep track of her ... which would kind of lend credence to her story, wouldn't it?
Using an old online photograph of a non celebrity without permission is subject to a civil lawsuit .
wp, S.Scott Johnson has lost his reputation and mind.
Better reread your facebook privacy notice again.
Once you uploaded them, your picture is no longer yours.
"Using an old online photograph of a non celebrity without permission is subject to a civil lawsuit ."
Well then, CS should sue your ass.
President is not committed to the truth as a central American value.
He lied again today with a tweet claiming that he didn't fire Comey over the Russian intervention.
When will you people ever realize that he's a compulsive liar? Or recognize that the forms his foreign policy decisions via Fox and Friends AM show?
"He lied again today with a tweet claiming that he didn't fire Comey over the Russian intervention."
Ever heard of Rosenstein?
You're such a Soros tool.
Using an old online photograph of a non celebrity without permission is subject to a civil lawsuit ." Little Lady Lynn
You leftist are so funny, Sue happy. Go for it. When will you be filing?
Give us the date and court so we can read it.
Don't run in hide CAsissy.
Using an old online photograph of a non celebrity without permission is subject to a civil lawsuit .
non celebrity?
i see busey, bon jovi, mcgrath, brady, and achmed the dead terrorist.
who's the non celebrity?
at best he owes jeff dunham a small royalty.
In Oct 2016, Alky wanted Comey Fired.
what an amazing transformation." RRB
ALKY , is nothing more then a tumbleweed, he goes in any direction the smallest breeze takes him.
Starbucks called every employee a Racist.
"Internet lawyers" should be taken with a grain of salt.
You continue to own all content and information, including photos, that you post on Facebook. You grant Facebook non-exclusive transferable license to use it. So it is absolutely INCORRECT that "you no longer own it".
It may be true that you can expect other people to use whatever you've posted, including photos, but you do retain rights and control to it.
Personally IANAL, if I wanted a site to remove an unauthorized photo of myself, I'd send them a DMCA take-down notice. You can use a form from the DMCA site (IANAL) although just sending a registered letter carries enough threat.
Not that you should IMHO, if you have voluntarily uploaded a photo or similar photos to the offending site already. Just sayin' a notice is more effective than carping in blog post. Take it in good nature, as it is apparently intended.
WP, you seem all in on this get Trump parade.
Is it True CNN lawyers forced the diclosure of Sean Hannity's Name?
"at best he owes jeff dunham a small royalty."
Achmed!
Starbucks called every employee a Racist.
and blacks are demanding free coffee as reparations.
i just might have to identify as black for the foreseeable future. at least until the free coffee offer expires.
Achmed!
precisely!
silence! i kill you!
Looks like Temporary and Illegitimate Nazi President got the Limees and Frogs to join him in damaging the Chemical facilities of Syria.
Putin a small bit player with a low grade economy was put in his place.
Putin promise to sink US Wares hips IF they attacked. Klienminded applauded Vaddy. Going so far as to side with mother Russia in any nuke exchange.
i just might have to identify as black for the foreseeable future. at least until the free coffee offer expires."RRB
A Brother of a Starbucks Muth"a.
The Retraining camps will be headed by "My People" former AG Eric Placeholder.
LOIS 4/8/18"
Someone wants 15 minutes of Fame and a 6 figure payday.
Roger uploads pictures to CHT and then gets upset when they end up on a post? Go figure!
Blogger C.H. Truth said...
Roger uploads pictures to CHT and then gets upset when they end up on a post? Go figure!
hey, it's not like you did the rest of us any favors by posting that freak show.
I didn't fire Comey over the Russian investigation. I just said I did.
I didn't walk up and grab women by the ****y. I just said I did.
Jane threatened to Sue Me for calling him a boy loving fag.
He never did any thing but bluster.
Roger uploads pictures to CHT and then gets upset when they end up on a post? Go figure.CHT
Poor broken Rog has posted his full name, dob, home address and much more.
Blogger rrb said...and blacks are demanding free coffee as reparations.
I saw that story, where the conservative vlogger (who is black) demanded and received his free Starbucks coffee. "I heard you were prejudiced, so I came for my reparations free coffee."
I think you should try a variation of that, as a stunt/social experiment/political point. I presume that you're a mature Caucasian male. "I hear you all were prejudiced, so I came in for my white privilege free coffee."
CHT MIGHT WANT A NEW THREAD, CRIMINAL REFERRAL ON HILLARY, GPS, COMEY, PAGE Stroak and page ET al.
bryan sharpe may think it is funny. Kansas what he did is a crime.
21-5801. Theft. (a) Theft is any of the following acts done with intent to permanently deprive the owner of the possession, use or benefit of the owner's property or services:
(1) Obtaining or exerting unauthorized control over property or services;
(2) obtaining control over property or services, by deception;
by JOEL B. POLLAK
18 Apr 2018
7,006
Fresno State University professor Randa Jarrar tweeted on Tuesday that former First Lady Barbara Bush “was a generous and smart and amazing racist who, along with her husband, raised a war criminal.”
She added: “Fuck outta here with your nice words.”
Ted Cruz vs O'Rourke is within the margin of error in Texas? Wow, that doesn't look good.
I still don't think Cruz has much to worry about though. Just political instinct ... because I think that voters are lying when they say that supporting or opposing Trump won't be a factor. I think they don't want to admit it out loud, but in the privacy of the booth they're going to want Cruz, to support President Trump.
Wp, once bitten twice shy?
WP once you grant facebook a non-exclusive transferable license to use it then you lost control of how it is used, and you have no legal recourse to say where and when it is used. In every legal and usual sense you cease to own it.
Your argument over semantics is tiresome and unnecessary.
At least you posted a new picture. I was sitting on the arm curl machine where I was doing 65lb arm curl exercise at 65lbs *15*3
If you were stupid enough to contribute to the Trump campaign? He used a lot of your money to pay his own personal legal fees.
The law firm representing Michael Cohen — which this week fought in court to shield communications between Cohen and President Trump from government investigators — has received payments from President Trump’s re-election campaign.
The payments to the law firm by Trump’s campaign could ultimately complicate any efforts by Robert Mueller’s team to win Cohen’s cooperation in the Russia investigation.
The arrangement could also violate campaign finance laws, if the Trump campaign’s payments cover legal work on the federal probe into Cohen’s financial dealings being conducted by prosecutors with the US Attorney’s office in Manhattan.
Trump’s 2020 campaign paid over $214,000 to McDermott, Will and Emory during the last three months of 2017, FEC records show. The campaign paid the firm an additional $13,000-plus in the first three months of this year.
$214.000.00
$13,000.00
--------
$227.000.00
https://coldheartedtruthlegacy.blogspot.com/2018/04/the-ususal-suspects.html
Don't go to HB's link it is porn
What an asshole.
Nope - Roger just provided us with a new picture to use in the line up. I think it's better.
Any picture of ugly broken Roger is porn..
Roger, did you sue CHT today?
Take rrb's fat ass off the top and I will get you more hits.
Internet "lawyer" would say "WP once you grant facebook a non-exclusive transferable license to use it then you lost control of how it is used, and you have no legal recourse to say where and when it is used"
Which is 100% incorrect. 'nuff said about that.
WP...
The pictures are not taken from Facebook. They have all been downloaded (by Roger) at one time or the other onto this particular website for the numerous posts where he believes people want to see him.
All previous photos downloaded to posts are stored on blogger for future use.
If there even was such as thing as an "internet lawyer" I am sure he would say that I have the rights to re-post pictures that were previously posted by Roger on a blog that I allowed him to post to.
Being an internet lawyer of some repute, I would say you are correct.
CH that would actually depend on the terms of service that he agrees to when uploading the images. Absent any terms transferring rights, technically he could claim copyright and demand that you remove them, even though he uploaded them himself. He won't have any enforceable privacy concerns though, or anything like that.
Blogspot.com TOS doesn't count, unless the TOS is easy to find from your blog. It's all a moot point however, because no lawsuit on something like this is ever going to achieve more than taking the photo down, while on the other hand no site owner with any sense is going to mess with fighting a DCMA takedown order, because it will shut the site down and subject the site owner to penalties. It is therefore, IANAL, completely and utterly pointless to talk about legal rights, privacy, damages etc. If someone wants his picture off, the takedown notice does that. A lawsuit won't, threats won't do it, there are no potential damages.
It just bugs me when someone is irresponsibly spouting off "legal" pronouncements at someone else that has a problem, and it's obvious that he doesn't have a clue, but someone taking him seriously might be harmed.
Doctor of Jurisprudence CHT.
Wp join Roger and jane in the lawsuit.
K, nuff said.
It just bugs me when someone is irresponsibly spouting off "legal" pronouncements
Well that's quite a bit of projection their WP since that's exactly what you have been doing.
And legally speaking, you don't know your ass from a hole in the ground.
However I do like the term "internet lawyer" even though I know you were trying to be a condescending prick when your threw it around.
I'm not arguing with you, because it's irrelevant to the party with an interest.
For those who don't recognize the acronym, IANAL means "I am not a lawyer". It is a shorthand way of saying, this is not legal advice and should not be construed as such. If you take action based on this personal opinion, you are doing so at your own risk.
That said, Roger, I made a living for a decade with an internet site, under my sole administration and control, and utilizing other internet sites, involving creating and publishing thousands of photos, design and text copy (my own property) monthly. I have dealt with IP on a professional basis during that time, and subsequently for corporate entities, and I have direct experience with DMCA and have needed to respond to DMCA notices. I have dealt personally with all of the legal concerns, including those necessary for an internet based business and also inside the courtroom. So you can take my opinion for what it is, or listen to random ignorance from blog commentary. It's entirely up to you. (IANAL)
And Coldheart, why don't you take his picture down since he asked you to? Whether or not you think he has any rights regarding it, it's still a dick move after he's complained.
If you don't want him posting here, try asking him. He just might stop. Hell, I would.
Wp join Roger and jane in the lawsuit.
"it's still a dick move after he's complained."
Rich I tell ya.
IANAL means "I am not a lawyer".
I don't think you need it WP. We get you're not a lawyer.
Yes we do get. He is so wrong so often on the law.
Blogger Roger Amick said...
Take rrb's fat ass off the top and I will get you more hits.
heh. you couldn't draw flies over there with your incessant page-long copy/pastes.
and never forget that the reason we're on THIS blog is because you completely destroyed the other blog.
lest you forget, alky...
Editor's Note:
The views of Roger Amick are in no way endorsed or supported by me, and should not be considered representative of either the historical or current Coldheartedtruth blog.
C.H. Truth
It's not for you; if someone gets nailed for a copyright violation and sues you for your bad legal advice, I don't care. It's so it can't happen to me.
1. It is an opinion not legal advice.
2. I'm not worried about being sued. If anyone procedes based on an internet blog post without hiring an actual lawyer then they get what they deserve.
But for your education this would be what it take to sue me.
1. I would have had to misrepresent myself as an actual practicing lawyer.
2. I would actually have to accept payment for legal services rendered.
You assumption that someone can sue because he took advice from an internet blog post is pure fiction.
"Pure fiction"
Apply to most of what the 5 liberal stooges of CHT post.
Whatever, CS. It's your lookout, like I said I don't care.
Post a Comment