.@michellemalkin reacts to accusations against Kavanaugh: To hijack the courtroom of public opinion, let alone courtrooms of law, by overturning what the burden of truth should be is so dangerous pic.twitter.com/moktEi9GpD— FOX & friends (@foxandfriends) September 20, 2018
Thursday, September 20, 2018
A passionate Michelle Malkin speaks out
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
28 comments:
Breaking news: Brett Kavanaugh accuser Christine Blasey Ford seeks to negotiate conditions under which she would testify next week.
The burden of proof is not required in testimony to the United States Senate.
It is not a court of law.
When will he produce his birth certificate?
Burden of proof to be President?
It didn't bother you.
To demand an independent investigation by the FBI should provide the burden of proof.
You object to the investigation.
You are dangerous because you object to the pursuit of burden of proof by the only department of justice qualified to investigate the allegations against both sides.
Alky Cray Cray.
She has until tomorrow morning.
This is not let's make a deal.
Stalling is over.
Acutually nothing has changed. She just playing a delaying game hoping something will turn up.
"Pursue of burden of proof" drunk posting.
Dr Cray Cray hook alky like a big bass.
You object to the investigation.
It's a giant waste of time. Any investigation would start at her testimony.
And she can give that to a senate committee just as well as to the FBI.
Stall
Change goal post
Stall
Wash
Repeat
Blogger Roger Amick said...
Breaking news: Brett Kavanaugh accuser Christine Blasey Ford seeks to negotiate conditions under which she would testify next week.
two things -
1) she has zero right to negotiate for anything regarding this situation, EVER.
2) will she actually take yes for an answer this time, or is she going to continue to play games?
negotiate conditions my ass.
if i'm grassley i'm giving her the condition -
get your cray cray ass here on monday and be prepared to testify.
failure to do so gives us a confirmation vote first thing tuesday morning.
the woman is a fucking psycho bitch and deserves to be treated as one.
Grassley has specifically addressed all this. She's not dictating anything, especially since her accusation is so alarmingly weak.
She wanted s chance to speak. She has been offered it. In private even!
Do why don't you stop all this horse shit. You're embarrassing yourself.
You object to the investigation.
that's because it's not required, alky. cray cray is WAY out of line.
Ford’s demand is, to put it simply, out of line, both with her prior statements and with congressional precedent. It is not that the FBI has not investigated such allegations; it did so with Clarence Thomas. However, there is no precedent for a quid pro quo demand for testimony by a witness. Individuals can certainly refuse to testify, yet conditioning testimony on a criminal investigation by a federal agency is well beyond the province of any witness. There may indeed be a basis for reopening the FBI background investigation, but the priority is to get both the testimony of Ford and Kavanaugh under oath.
https://thehill.com/opinion/judiciary/407405-ford-has-no-right-to-set-conditions-for-kavanaugh-testimony
Roger, answer us this.
What address did it happen
What day
What time
A 1992 news article has surfaced. Its has Cory Booker discussing his own sexual assault when he was in high school.
More liberal hypocrisy.
You are all objecting to the pursuit burden of proof.
WHY CHRISTINE BLASEY FORD’S HIGH SCHOOL YEARBOOKS WERE SCRUBBED: Faculty Approved Racism, Binge Drinking and Promiscuity
susan collins received rape threats.
asshole swallwell said boo-fucking-hoo.
nice, eh alky?
"You are all objecting to the pursuit burden of proof."
Wrong again.
Projecting.
Blogger Roger Amick said...
You are all objecting to the pursuit burden of proof.
not at all, since cray cray can't meet that standard. not even close. she can't remember -
the date
the place
the time
who was there (2? 4? more? less?)
you must be implying that the burden of proof is on kavanaugh. that would be bullshit.
so what else you got, alky?
Cali, it is like they are all attempting to hide the real her.
Scrub the facts , evidence and truth.
He's been investigated by the FBI six times.
Simply demanding something be done again is just arrogance.
Anonymous Myballs said...
A 1992 news article has surfaced. Its has Cory Booker discussing his own sexual assault when he was in high school.
More liberal hypocrisy.
let me guess -
spartacus had gay sex with T-BONE?
so what else you got, alky?"
He is out looking on the net for what he is going to think next.
You are all objecting to the pursuit burden of proof." Alky
I looked in my Black's Law Dictionary.
I did not find your term
Blogger Roger Amick said...
You are all objecting to the pursuit burden of proof.
you're objecting to kavanaugh's right to confront his accuser.
The burden of proof is not required in testimony to the United States Senate." Alky JD
No it is not. Good for her because she has nada.
Post a Comment