Since we're supposed to believe everything Woodward says as gospel, we're all waiting for our next vdrm talking points after he just admitted that hr looked hard for trump Russia collusion and after two years of looking, found absolutely none.
You are falling in step with the Republican campaign strategy for the off year elections. It isn't going to work.
Screaming SOCIALISM while sitting on the roof of your house screaming for help from the government isn't a working brain function.
The local candidates are running on local issues. The number of women running for Congress is extraordinary. The white suburban, educated women are not going to sit back and not vote. To a lesser degree that is going to happen umung white males. But it's already showing up in polls across America.
In the midwest the tarrifs are going to have an impact because the enthusiasm among Democrats. And the lack of support for Republicans will lead to a lower turnout among Republicans who can't stand Trump but won't vote for Republicans. They will either not vote, or hold their noses and vote for Democrats.
Florida a belware of the country where the Democratic candidate for governor has been holding onto his margin in the polls according to Real Clear Politics.
Screaming HOAX is not affecting the local elections.
The economy is not a problem for the Democrats. The blue collar districts have been seeing the results of the tarrifs on the manufacturing jobs and the movement of some manufacturing jobs overseas. Those guys will again either not vote or hold their noses and vote for the Democrats.
The attempts to discredit Bob Woodward book is not going anywhere outside of the base.
The Senate favors the Republicans. But I just have to wonder, when another major party story comes along with the President again pushing his panic button and the Republican candidates who can't or won't criticize the President we may see the voters swing left.
Jimmy was having trouble in school. His teacher was always yelling at him, "You're driving me crazy, Jimmy. Can't you learn anything? One day Jimmy's mother came to school to see how he was doing. The teacher told her honestly that her son was simply a disaster, getting very low marks, and that she had never had such an unmotivated and ignorant boy in her entire teaching career. Jimmy's mom, shocked at the feedback, withdrew her son from school and moved out of Detroit, relocating to Cleveland.
25 years later, the teacher was diagnosed with irreversible cardiac disease. Her doctors all strongly advised her to have open heart surgery, which only one surgeon at the Cleveland Clinic could perform. Left with no other options, the teacher decided to have the operation, which was remarkably successful.
When she opened her eyes after the surgery she saw the handsome young doctor who headed her surgical team smiling down at her. She wanted to thank him, but could not talk. Her face started to turn blue, she raised her hand, trying to tell him something, but quickly died.
The doctor was shocked, wondering what went wrong so suddenly. When the doctor turned around to leave the room, he saw Jimmy, now a janitor at the Clinic, had unplugged the life-support equipment in order to plug in his vacuum cleaner. If you thought that Jimmy had become a heart-surgeon, there is a high likelihood that you voted for Hillary.
Nike stock price reaches all-time high after Colin Kaepernick ad http://www.cbsnews.com/news/nike-stock-price-reaches-all-time-high-despite-colin-kaepernick-ad-boycott/
Shares of Nike reached an all-time high Friday afternoon, rebounding from a recent dip spurred by concerns about consumer boycott after the athletic apparel maker signed a high-profile deal with former NFL quarterback Colin Kaepernick.
The company's stock rose slightly on Friday, closing at $83.49. Since Nike announced the campaign on Labor Day, shares are up about 4 percent. Longer-term, Nike stock has surged 33 percent this year as Wall Street bet that the company would be able to ride out the negative publicity. Online sales of Nike gear jumped 31 percent from Sept. 2 through Sept. 4, nearly double the company's sales during the same period a year ago, according to Edison Trends, a digital commerce research company.
Screaming SOCIALISM while sitting on the roof of your house screaming for help from the government isn't a working brain function.
as you get rescued by a private citizen member of the cajun navy while the government flunkie is still trying to read the instructions on the life raft.
i think you're onto something, alky. all we ever need to achieve that perfect utopian society is just a little more government fueled by a little more of somebody else's money.
alexandria fucktardio cortez is our future. a clueless bucktoothed bernie sanders wannabe.
White House counselor Kellyanne Conway's husband George Conway took aim at the president on Twitter Friday over President Trump's criticism of his predecessor, former President Obama.
In a tweet, George Conway, a conservative lawyer, criticized Trump for mocking Obama for a 2008 gaffe in which he mistakenly said he visited "57 states" during his first presidential run.
"When President Obama said that he has been to '57 States,' very little mention in Fake News Media. Can you imagine if I said that...story of the year!" Trump had written in his tweet.
George Conway responded on Twitter, saying that there is a "huge difference" between Obama's mistake and Trump's "witless prevarication on virtually all topics, large and small."
The small minded people support the President despite his actions, lies and bigotry.
Bank fraud, tax fraud, lobbying fraud, witness tampering — all true, Manafort said, repudiating the president’s repeated claim that Mueller’s investigation is a witch hunt.
And the fraud was part of a scheme to hide income from, and obscure his work for, Russian-backed politicians, which is why he appeared on Mueller’s radar in the first place.
The question now is what does Manafort know, and who, if anyone, he can incriminate.
All you have is alky alky and alky and alky and alky and alky and alky and alky and alky and alky and alky and alky and alky and alky and alky and alky and alky and alky negro beaner
Bank fraud, tax fraud, lobbying fraud, witness tampering — all true, Manafort said, repudiating the president’s repeated claim that Mueller’s investigation is a witch hunt.
i think the word you're looking for, the one that's conspicuous in its absence is...
RUSSIA.
you know, the place that had all that collusionary stuff going on with the pooty poot and the trump.
and that would be the witch that's still being hunted there, alky.
And the fraud was part of a scheme to hide income from, and obscure his work for, Russian-backed politicians, which is why he appeared on Mueller’s radar in the first place.
Actually no, Rog. As is stated in court documents, the investigation of Paul Manafort did not "arise from" the Russian probe. It was part of a second "secret" authorization that provided Manafort as an "inherited" investigation.
At least that is what the Attorneys from Special Counsel argued.
And the fraud was part of a scheme to hide income from, and obscure his work for, Russian-backed politicians, which is why he appeared on Mueller’s radar in the first place.
except that he worked for ukrainian-backed pols.
you do know that ukraine and russia are not the same place, right alky?
The question now is what does Manafort know, and who, if anyone, he can incriminate.
because after all this time, manafort is obviously saving the best for last. i mean there's like no chance that if he could've incriminated someone else, anyone else, to save his own ass he would've done so by now. no siree bob.
no, this manafort fella is a cagey bird. he's gonna drop the mother of all incriminations any day now alky. can ya feel it? i mean, i can. can you? and with each tweet trump telegraphs his fear and frustration, only to liberals who have that special sixth sense to notice it though, but anyway...
trump is literally shitting his silk boxers because he knows - HE KNOWS - that any day now could be his last.
i think you guys have really, really, REALLY got him this time alky. so pop another opioid, sit back in that barcalounger of yours, and have mail order bring you some jiffy pop. this is starting to get really good.
BREAKING: Senate Republicans signaled they plan to move ahead on Brett Kavanaugh’s nomination despite a decades-old sexual misconduct allegation.
The statement from Judiciary Committee Republicans came shortly after The Washington Post published a story Sunday afternoon that included an on-the-record interview with the woman alleging the sexual misconduct, Christine Blasey Ford. The committee Republicans said it was disturbing that the allegation was never brought to the attention of the full panel previously.
Democrats led by Senate Minority Leader Charles E. Schumer (N.Y.) called for the committee vote to be postponed. The panel is scheduled to vote on Thursday.
Keep Reading
This story will be updating.
Earlier this summer, Christine Blasey Ford wrote a confidential letter to a senior Democratic lawmaker alleging that Supreme Court nominee Brett M. Kavanaugh sexually assaulted her more than three decades ago, when they were high school students in suburban Maryland. Since Wednesday, she has watched as that bare-bones version of her story became public without her name or her consent, drawing a blanket denial from Kavanaugh and roiling a nomination that just days ago seemed all but certain to succeed.
Now, Ford has decided that if her story is going to be told, she wants to be the one to tell it.
Speaking publicly for the first time, Ford said that one summer in the early 1980s, Kavanaugh and a friend — both “stumbling drunk,” Ford alleges — corralled her into a bedroom during a gathering of teenagers at a house in Montgomery County.
ADVERTISING
While his friend watched, she said, Kavanaugh pinned her to a bed on her back and groped her over her clothes, grinding his body against hers and clumsily attempting to pull off her one-piece bathing suit and the clothing she wore over it. When she tried to scream, she said, he put his hand over her mouth.
“I thought he might inadvertently kill me,” said Ford, now a 51-year-old research psychologist in northern California. “He was trying to attack me and remove my clothing.”
Ford said she was able to escape when Kavanaugh’s friend and classmate at Georgetown Preparatory School, Mark Judge, jumped on top of them, sending all three tumbling. She said she ran from the room, briefly locked herself in a bathroom and then fled the house.
Earlier this summer, Christine Blasey Ford wrote a confidential letter to a senior Democratic lawmaker alleging that Supreme Court nominee Brett M. Kavanaugh sexually assaulted her more than three decades ago, when they were high school students in suburban Maryland. Since Wednesday, she has watched as that bare-bones version of her story became public without her name or her consent, drawing a blanket denial from Kavanaugh and roiling a nomination that just days ago seemed all but certain to succeed.
Now, Ford has decided that if her story is going to be told, she wants to be the one to tell it.
Speaking publicly for the first time, Ford said that one summer in the early 1980s, Kavanaugh and a friend — both “stumbling drunk,” Ford alleges — corralled her into a bedroom during a gathering of teenagers at a house in Montgomery County. While his friend watched, she said, Kavanaugh pinned her to a bed on her back and groped her over her clothes, grinding his body against hers and clumsily attempting to pull off her one-piece bathing suit and the clothing she wore over it. When she tried to scream, she said, he put his hand over her mouth.
“I thought he might inadvertently kill me,” said Ford, now a 51-year-old research psychologist in northern California. “He was trying to attack me and remove my clothing.”
Ford said she was able to escape when Kavanaugh’s friend and classmate at Georgetown Preparatory School, Mark Judge, jumped on top of them, sending all three tumbling. She said she ran from the room, briefly locked herself in a bathroom and then fled the house.
Ford said she told no one of the incident in any detail until 2012, when she was in couples therapy with her husband. The therapist’s notes, portions of which were provided by Ford and reviewed by The Washington Post, do not mention Kavanaugh’s name but say she reported that she was attacked by students “from an elitist boys’ school” who went on to become “highly respected and high-ranking members of society in Washington.” The notes say four boys were involved, a discrepancy Ford says was an error on the therapist’s part. Ford said there were four boys at the party but only two in the room. Notes from an individual therapy session the following year, when she was being treated for what she says have been long-term effects of the incident, show Ford described a “rape attempt” in her late teens.
In an interview, her husband, Russell Ford, said that in the 2012 sessions, she recounted being trapped in a room with two drunken boys, one of whom pinned her to a bed, molested her and prevented her from screaming. He said he recalled that his wife used Kavanaugh’s last name and voiced concern that Kavanaugh — then a federal judge — might one day be nominated to the Supreme Court.
On Sunday, the White House sent The Post a statement Kavanaugh issued last week, when the outlines of Ford’s account first became public: “I categorically and unequivocally deny this allegation. I did not do this back in high school or at any time.”
Through a White House spokesman, Kavanaugh declined to comment further on Ford’s allegation and did not respond to questions about whether he knew her during high school. The White House had no additional comment.
Reached by email Sunday, Judge declined to comment. In an interview Friday with The Weekly Standard, before Ford’s name was known, he denied that any such incident occurred. “It’s just absolutely nuts. I never saw Brett act that way,” Judge said. He told the New York Times that Kavanaugh was a “brilliant student” who loved sports and was not “into anything crazy or illegal.”
Christine Ford is a professor at Palo Alto University who teaches in a consortium with Stanford University, training graduate students in clinical psychology. Her work has been widely published in academic journals.
23 comments:
Since we're supposed to believe everything Woodward says as gospel, we're all waiting for our next vdrm talking points after he just admitted that hr looked hard for trump Russia collusion and after two years of looking, found absolutely none.
Guess we can rate Arizona a Republican hold for the senate.
Senate Candidate Kyrsten Sinema’s Anti-War Flyers Depicted Soldiers As Skeletons Advancing ‘U.S. Terror’
Either the Democrats gave up on the seat a long time or they've gone stark raving mad.
You are falling in step with the Republican campaign strategy for the off year elections. It isn't going to work.
Screaming SOCIALISM while sitting on the roof of your house screaming for help from the government isn't a working brain function.
The local candidates are running on local issues. The number of women running for Congress is extraordinary. The white suburban, educated women are not going to sit back and not vote. To a lesser degree that is going to happen umung white males. But it's already showing up in polls across America.
In the midwest the tarrifs are going to have an impact because the enthusiasm among Democrats. And the lack of support for Republicans will lead to a lower turnout among Republicans who can't stand Trump but won't vote for Republicans. They will either not vote, or hold their noses and vote for Democrats.
Florida a belware of the country where the Democratic candidate for governor has been holding onto his margin in the polls according to Real Clear Politics.
Screaming HOAX is not affecting the local elections.
The economy is not a problem for the Democrats. The blue collar districts have been seeing the results of the tarrifs on the manufacturing jobs and the movement of some manufacturing jobs overseas. Those guys will again either not vote or hold their noses and vote for the Democrats.
The attempts to discredit Bob Woodward book is not going anywhere outside of the base.
The Senate favors the Republicans. But I just have to wonder, when another major party story comes along with the President again pushing his panic button and the Republican candidates who can't or won't criticize the President we may see the voters swing left.
Jimmy was having trouble in school. His teacher was always yelling at him, "You're driving me crazy, Jimmy. Can't you learn anything? One day Jimmy's mother came to school to see how he was doing. The teacher told her honestly that her son was simply a disaster, getting very low marks, and that she had never had such an unmotivated and ignorant boy in her entire teaching career. Jimmy's mom, shocked at the feedback, withdrew her son from school and moved out of Detroit, relocating to Cleveland.
25 years later, the teacher was diagnosed with irreversible cardiac disease. Her doctors all strongly advised her to have open heart surgery, which only one surgeon at the Cleveland Clinic could perform. Left with no other options, the teacher decided to have the operation, which was remarkably successful.
When she opened her eyes after the surgery she saw the handsome young doctor who headed her surgical team smiling down at her. She wanted to thank him, but could not talk. Her face started to turn blue, she raised her hand, trying to tell him something, but quickly died.
The doctor was shocked, wondering what went wrong so suddenly. When the doctor turned around to leave the room, he saw Jimmy, now a janitor at the Clinic, had unplugged the life-support equipment in order to plug in his vacuum cleaner. If you thought that Jimmy had become a heart-surgeon, there is a high likelihood that you voted for Hillary.
h/t: AoS
September 14th 2018
Nike stock price reaches all-time high after Colin Kaepernick ad http://www.cbsnews.com/news/nike-stock-price-reaches-all-time-high-despite-colin-kaepernick-ad-boycott/
Shares of Nike reached an all-time high Friday afternoon, rebounding from a recent dip spurred by concerns about consumer boycott after the athletic apparel maker signed a high-profile deal with former NFL quarterback Colin Kaepernick.
The company's stock rose slightly on Friday, closing at $83.49. Since Nike announced the campaign on Labor Day, shares are up about 4 percent. Longer-term, Nike stock has surged 33 percent this year as Wall Street bet that the company would be able to ride out the negative publicity. Online sales of Nike gear jumped 31 percent from Sept. 2 through Sept. 4, nearly double the company's sales during the same period a year ago, according to Edison Trends, a digital commerce research company.
Screaming SOCIALISM while sitting on the roof of your house screaming for help from the government isn't a working brain function.
as you get rescued by a private citizen member of the cajun navy while the government flunkie is still trying to read the instructions on the life raft.
i think you're onto something, alky. all we ever need to achieve that perfect utopian society is just a little more government fueled by a little more of somebody else's money.
alexandria fucktardio cortez is our future. a clueless bucktoothed bernie sanders wannabe.
...after the athletic apparel maker signed a high-profile deal with former NFL quarterback Colin Kaepernick.
so...
...kaepernick sacrificed exactly nothing.
LOL.
thought so.
another con artist hits the big time.
maybe he can sign a contract with afro-sheen while he's at it.
I wonder when she will get fired?
White House counselor Kellyanne Conway's husband George Conway took aim at the president on Twitter Friday over President Trump's criticism of his predecessor, former President Obama.
In a tweet, George Conway, a conservative lawyer, criticized Trump for mocking Obama for a 2008 gaffe in which he mistakenly said he visited "57 states" during his first presidential run.
"When President Obama said that he has been to '57 States,' very little mention in Fake News Media. Can you imagine if I said that...story of the year!" Trump had written in his tweet.
George Conway responded on Twitter, saying that there is a "huge difference" between Obama's mistake and Trump's "witless prevarication on virtually all topics, large and small."
The small minded people support the President despite his actions, lies and bigotry.
thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/406885-george-conway-rips-trump-over-tweet-about-obama-2008-gaffe?amp
newsflash, alky.
george conway has been publicly criticizing trump from day one.
those of us who have been paying attention know this.
Bank fraud, tax fraud, lobbying fraud, witness tampering — all true, Manafort said, repudiating the president’s repeated claim that Mueller’s investigation is a witch hunt.
And the fraud was part of a scheme to hide income from, and obscure his work for, Russian-backed politicians, which is why he appeared on Mueller’s radar in the first place.
The question now is what does Manafort know, and who, if anyone, he can incriminate.
All you have is alky alky and alky and alky and alky and alky and alky and alky and alky and alky and alky and alky and alky and alky and alky and alky and alky and alky negro beaner
Blogger Roger Amick said...
Bank fraud, tax fraud, lobbying fraud, witness tampering — all true, Manafort said, repudiating the president’s repeated claim that Mueller’s investigation is a witch hunt.
i think the word you're looking for, the one that's conspicuous in its absence is...
RUSSIA.
you know, the place that had all that collusionary stuff going on with the pooty poot and the trump.
and that would be the witch that's still being hunted there, alky.
And the fraud was part of a scheme to hide income from, and obscure his work for, Russian-backed politicians, which is why he appeared on Mueller’s radar in the first place.
Actually no, Rog. As is stated in court documents, the investigation of Paul Manafort did not "arise from" the Russian probe. It was part of a second "secret" authorization that provided Manafort as an "inherited" investigation.
At least that is what the Attorneys from Special Counsel argued.
But what would they know, huh Rog?
Certainly not as much as you!
Given your post lately one does wonder if you are abusing youy opiets or alcohol. It's certainly not the work of a rational mind.
And the fraud was part of a scheme to hide income from, and obscure his work for, Russian-backed politicians, which is why he appeared on Mueller’s radar in the first place.
except that he worked for ukrainian-backed pols.
you do know that ukraine and russia are not the same place, right alky?
The question now is what does Manafort know, and who, if anyone, he can incriminate.
because after all this time, manafort is obviously saving the best for last. i mean there's like no chance that if he could've incriminated someone else, anyone else, to save his own ass he would've done so by now. no siree bob.
no, this manafort fella is a cagey bird. he's gonna drop the mother of all incriminations any day now alky. can ya feel it? i mean, i can. can you? and with each tweet trump telegraphs his fear and frustration, only to liberals who have that special sixth sense to notice it though, but anyway...
trump is literally shitting his silk boxers because he knows - HE KNOWS - that any day now could be his last.
i think you guys have really, really, REALLY got him this time alky. so pop another opioid, sit back in that barcalounger of yours, and have mail order bring you some jiffy pop. this is starting to get really good.
BREAKING: Senate Republicans signaled they plan to move ahead on Brett Kavanaugh’s nomination despite a decades-old sexual misconduct allegation.
The statement from Judiciary Committee Republicans came shortly after The Washington Post published a story Sunday afternoon that included an on-the-record interview with the woman alleging the sexual misconduct, Christine Blasey Ford. The committee Republicans said it was disturbing that the allegation was never brought to the attention of the full panel previously.
Democrats led by Senate Minority Leader Charles E. Schumer (N.Y.) called for the committee vote to be postponed. The panel is scheduled to vote on Thursday.
Keep Reading
This story will be updating.
Earlier this summer, Christine Blasey Ford wrote a confidential letter to a senior Democratic lawmaker alleging that Supreme Court nominee Brett M. Kavanaugh sexually assaulted her more than three decades ago, when they were high school students in suburban Maryland. Since Wednesday, she has watched as that bare-bones version of her story became public without her name or her consent, drawing a blanket denial from Kavanaugh and roiling a nomination that just days ago seemed all but certain to succeed.
Now, Ford has decided that if her story is going to be told, she wants to be the one to tell it.
Speaking publicly for the first time, Ford said that one summer in the early 1980s, Kavanaugh and a friend — both “stumbling drunk,” Ford alleges — corralled her into a bedroom during a gathering of teenagers at a house in Montgomery County.
ADVERTISING
While his friend watched, she said, Kavanaugh pinned her to a bed on her back and groped her over her clothes, grinding his body against hers and clumsily attempting to pull off her one-piece bathing suit and the clothing she wore over it. When she tried to scream, she said, he put his hand over her mouth.
“I thought he might inadvertently kill me,” said Ford, now a 51-year-old research psychologist in northern California. “He was trying to attack me and remove my clothing.”
Ford said she was able to escape when Kavanaugh’s friend and classmate at Georgetown Preparatory School, Mark Judge, jumped on top of them, sending all three tumbling. She said she ran from the room, briefly locked herself in a bathroom and then fled the house.
Kavanaugh’s confirmation vote should be postponed.
She has passed a lie detector test.
She has notes from the time she was assaulted.
It was part of a second "secret" authorization that provided Manafort as an "inherited" investigation.
At least that is what the Attorneys from Special Counsel argued.
Deep state conspiracy theories are always your attempt to prove the investigation was triggered by partisan politics in the Fbi/doj.
Neither one.
They just escape your feeble mind.
The Fake News Washington Post exclusive.
Earlier this summer, Christine Blasey Ford wrote a confidential letter to a senior Democratic lawmaker alleging that Supreme Court nominee Brett M. Kavanaugh sexually assaulted her more than three decades ago, when they were high school students in suburban Maryland. Since Wednesday, she has watched as that bare-bones version of her story became public without her name or her consent, drawing a blanket denial from Kavanaugh and roiling a nomination that just days ago seemed all but certain to succeed.
Now, Ford has decided that if her story is going to be told, she wants to be the one to tell it.
Speaking publicly for the first time, Ford said that one summer in the early 1980s, Kavanaugh and a friend — both “stumbling drunk,” Ford alleges — corralled her into a bedroom during a gathering of teenagers at a house in Montgomery County.
While his friend watched, she said, Kavanaugh pinned her to a bed on her back and groped her over her clothes, grinding his body against hers and clumsily attempting to pull off her one-piece bathing suit and the clothing she wore over it. When she tried to scream, she said, he put his hand over her mouth.
“I thought he might inadvertently kill me,” said Ford, now a 51-year-old research psychologist in northern California. “He was trying to attack me and remove my clothing.”
Ford said she was able to escape when Kavanaugh’s friend and classmate at Georgetown Preparatory School, Mark Judge, jumped on top of them, sending all three tumbling. She said she ran from the room, briefly locked herself in a bathroom and then fled the house.
Ford said she told no one of the incident in any detail until 2012, when she was in couples therapy with her husband. The therapist’s notes, portions of which were provided by Ford and reviewed by The Washington Post, do not mention Kavanaugh’s name but say she reported that she was attacked by students “from an elitist boys’ school” who went on to become “highly respected and high-ranking members of society in Washington.” The notes say four boys were involved, a discrepancy Ford says was an error on the therapist’s part. Ford said there were four boys at the party but only two in the room.
Notes from an individual therapy session the following year, when she was being treated for what she says have been long-term effects of the incident, show Ford described a “rape attempt” in her late teens.
In an interview, her husband, Russell Ford, said that in the 2012 sessions, she recounted being trapped in a room with two drunken boys, one of whom pinned her to a bed, molested her and prevented her from screaming. He said he recalled that his wife used Kavanaugh’s last name and voiced concern that Kavanaugh — then a federal judge — might one day be nominated to the Supreme Court.
On Sunday, the White House sent The Post a statement Kavanaugh issued last week, when the outlines of Ford’s account first became public: “I categorically and unequivocally deny this allegation. I did not do this back in high school or at any time.”
Through a White House spokesman, Kavanaugh declined to comment further on Ford’s allegation and did not respond to questions about whether he knew her during high school. The White House had no additional comment.
Reached by email Sunday, Judge declined to comment. In an interview Friday with The Weekly Standard, before Ford’s name was known, he denied that any such incident occurred. “It’s just absolutely nuts. I never saw Brett act that way,” Judge said. He told the New York Times that Kavanaugh was a “brilliant student” who loved sports and was not “into anything crazy or illegal.”
Christine Ford is a professor at Palo Alto University who teaches in a consortium with Stanford University, training graduate students in clinical psychology. Her work has been widely published in academic journals.
Manafort may have information detrimental to the President.
I have been reading more than rrb can.
At this time there is no direct connection between the campaign organization in what is available.
I'm not going to predict the future. Like Scott
Blogger Roger Amick said...
Manafort may have information detrimental to the President.
I have been reading more than rrb can.
well alky,
i'm impressed at the fact that i continue to live inside your pickled skull rent fucking free.
Post a Comment