This goes to both the credibility of the accuser as well as the independence and credibility of the Washington Post. A real newspaper, upon learning of the name of another key witness would have pursued that lead, rather than fill their newspaper with opinion pieces and crazy stores based on more anonymous sources.
Ironically, the Washington doesn't have any sort of lead story or any story I can find regarding the fact that the fourth and final potential witness for Ford has denied not only any knowledge of a party, but any knowledge of even knowing Kavanaugh. It's if the story doesn't exist.
Read through the following twitter feed for more details....
1) More big breaking news, which further undercuts the Ford accusation, as well as media handling of it. A source has given me the email that WaPo reporter Emma Brown sent to Mark Judge, one person Ford claims was at the party. This email is dated Sunday, Sept. 16, 2018— Kimberley Strassel (@KimStrassel) September 23, 2018
Note: If one were to solely rely on the Washington Post to get their news, they would truly be living in an entirely different reality than the rest of the country.
18 comments:
This is the letter the witness's lawyer sent the committee:
Dear Ms. Mehler:
Ms. Leland Keyser has engaged me in the limited capacity to address your request for information in the email below. Simply put, Ms. Keyser does not know Mr. Kavanaugh and she has no recollection of ever being at a party or gathering where he was present, with, or without, Dr. Ford.
Ms. Keyser hopes this information is helpful to your investigation. I am avaiable for any further questions you may have.
Sincerely,
—
The Washington Post reported this showed she supports Ford, even if she didn't remember this incident, which Ford said she probably wouldn't.
*** BS AERT ***
*** FAKE NEWS ALERT ***
Why did the other woman drown the baby (( Dr Cray Cray's story of she had witnesses)?
Post-op Jane, is good at making shuff up.
"JamesSeptember 23, 2018 at 6:38 AM
The Washington Post reported late Saturday that it had talked to Keyser, who told the paper she believed Ford's allegation."
Well perhaps Keyser doesn't remember being there, because apparently at one time her story was that there were four "boys" at the party, not four people, and Keyser is not a boy?
Or maybe Keyser was one of the four boys in the room, had a sex change, and doesn't want to admit to being witness to an assault?
So many outlandish possibilities.
So few that make any sense if you are still a Ford believer.
We know Jane, Roger and fatty believe her. No matter what. As each witness comes forward and says they never saw it.
Will we get more witnesses, because IF Dr Cray Cray is running over her people in the room.
The Washington Post reported late Saturday that it had talked to Keyser, who told the paper she believed Ford's allegation.
___________
Should be easy enough for Fox News to check with Keyser on that.
Yeah all you have to ask is "Ms Keyser, do you believe you were at a party you have no memory of in which a sexual assualt was committed by a man you never met?"
And she could answer, I do not specifically recall the party or the man, but I do believe Ford when she says she was pinned to the bed and groped by Kavanaugh.
We all believe you are full of shit and are a danger to young boys
Andrew McCabe's Lawyer Is on Christine Ford's Legal Team
What was Ford up to when classmates were contacted by her and nudged to see if they could possibly remember something?
Post-op Jane what nonsense:
"JamesSeptember 23, 2018 at 2:07 PM
And she could answer, I do not specifically recall the party or the man, but I do believe Ford when she says she was pinned to the bed and groped by ""
Is the hearing on for Thurday?
James said...
And she could answer, I do not specifically recall the party or the man, but I do believe Ford when she says she was pinned to the bed and groped by Kavanaugh.
She could have said this on her letter to the committee. But she didn't.
The Washington Post reported late Saturday that it had talked to Keyser, who told the paper she believed Ford's allegation.
Better tell that to the Washington Post, because they haven't bothered to write that story and put on their website as of yet.
She could have said this on her letter to the committee. But she didn't.
Because that would be perjury.
Post -op Jane is making up what she wants to see.
Post a Comment