- Ivanka did not know she was doing anything wrong. Hillary did.
- Ivanka did not engage in a cover up by deleting her emails, which means no laws were broken regarding the Presidential Records Act. Hillary deleted 33,000 emails.
- No classified information passed through Ivanka’s personal email account. According to the FBI, Hillary sent or received over 100 emails containing classified information.
- Ivanka did not set up a secret server in the bathroom of her private home. Hillary did.
- Ivanka did not lie about her emails. Hillary lied repeatedly.
- Ivanka did not use BleachBit. Hillary used BleachBit to ensure no one would ever read the 33,000 emails she deleted.
- Ivanka did not use a hammer to smash phones as a means to ensure no one saw her emails. Hillary used a hammer to destroy multiple mobile devices.
- Ivanka did not deliberately attempt to hide her emails from the public and government. Hillary set up a secret server in her bathroom, deleted 33,000 emails with BleachBit, and took a hammer to her phones.
- This is the first time Ivanka has worked in government — which lends credibility to the fact she did not know she was violating policy. Hillary installed a secret server after serving for two decades in government.
- Ivanka was not properly trained on the use of government and personal email. Hillary was and signed a document to that effect.
- Hillary claimed those 33,000 deleted were related to children and “yoga routines.” While she has not made this claim, it would be more believable coming from Ivanka.
This sort of thing should be obvious to everybody, but unfortunately in this day in age, it's not.
While the left keeps demanding that there is some sort of hypocrisy involved because nobody on the right wants to "lock her up" (her being Ivanka) - the reality is that Hillary Clinton was never charged and deemed by liberal hero "James Comey" to have done nothing that any reasonable prosecutor would attempt to charge her for.
So the question because... if no reasonable prosecutor would bring charges against Hillary for her email behavior, why would anyone believe that "any" prosecutor would demand that Ivanka Trump was breaking the law?
More to the point, in Government there are policies and laws. You can break policies and not necessarily be breaking law. While it may be against certain policies to conduct business on a personal email, rather than through your secured government issued email, it is against the "law" to send classified information over personal email.
While the left keeps demanding that there is some sort of hypocrisy involved because nobody on the right wants to "lock her up" (her being Ivanka) - the reality is that Hillary Clinton was never charged and deemed by liberal hero "James Comey" to have done nothing that any reasonable prosecutor would attempt to charge her for.
So the question because... if no reasonable prosecutor would bring charges against Hillary for her email behavior, why would anyone believe that "any" prosecutor would demand that Ivanka Trump was breaking the law?
More to the point, in Government there are policies and laws. You can break policies and not necessarily be breaking law. While it may be against certain policies to conduct business on a personal email, rather than through your secured government issued email, it is against the "law" to send classified information over personal email.
134 comments:
Why does donnie lie about the e-mails....CH...ivanka fucked up, they know it...She saw the old man try to eviserate Hillary then does the same stupid thing hillary did....BTW....a private server probably is more secure than the public server she used....sad...
Donald Trump doesn’t mind using flawed logic to get him out of a hole, and in some cases when even that doesn’t work, the president simply “invents” facts.
Another example of such inventiveness came this week when Trump, who has seen the now Democrat-controlled House Oversight and Government Reform Committee begin an investigation into whether or not Ivanka Trump used private email for government-related business, cooked up more than a 100,000 Hillary Clinton emails which don’t exist.
Clinton had used her private server for government-related emails back when she was the Secretary of State, 33,000 of which were eventually deleted by an employee managing Clinton’s private email. However, a subsequent investigation by the FBI, although it rebuked Clinton for her carelessness, didn’t find anything criminal in her actions.
But that hasn’t stopped Trump from continuing to attack Clinton, and now when his own daughter is accused of using a private email address to send government-related emails, the president made up an additional 100,000 Hillary emails to defend Ivanka Trump’s actions, as reported by Newsweek.
“There was no deletion of emails like the 33,000 plus, probably another hundred thousand, that Hillary Clinton did after she got a subpoena.”
There is absolutely no evidence to back up his claim, and the number of deleted Clinton emails has not changed since it was first reported. So Trump seems to have invented 100,000 emails to deflect from the accusations that plague his own daughter. The president also said that none of the emails Ivanka sent were classified, saying she was “very innocent,” and that it happened over a “short period of time” and “very early on” in her service.
Well Denny...
Since Clinton never turned her server over to the FBI (until after she used BleachBit to wipe it clean) we will never know for sure how many emails she deleted.
So there is no evidence existing as to how many emails she actually deleted. By logic, there is no more evidence to dispute the claim than there was to make it. It's sort of ironic to criticize someone for making a claim that will have exactly the same amount of evidence that your criticism has.
btw... when someone has evidence, and the FBI subpoenas that evidence, and then the person in question destroys said evidence so that the FBI cannot examine it...
what, again, in legal terms, would that be called?
Oh, yeah... obstruction.
anyone whose name is not clinton would die in prison for what hillary did.
and it's been widely reported that every single email ivanka sent or received has been archived, so i'm not seeing what the problem is here.
you have to be "alky stupid" to draw such a glaring false equivalence between these two situations.
what, again, in legal terms, would that be called?
That you are full of shit...how's that work lil Scott????
Since none of Ivanka's crap has been reviewed by anyone else but her lawyer....the legal question is what else is there????? Too damn funny Scotty....they both used public servers and got caught...One should have really known better since her dad was running on the evil Hillary.....FU, you loose....LOLOLOL
name is not clinton would die in prison for what hillary did.
You did forget the trump brand, asshole....LOL
Since none of Ivanka's crap has been reviewed by anyone else but her lawyer....the legal question is what else is there?
Sure... who told you that, ace?
When your last name is Trump, you are guilty if accused, and then still guilty if after 2.5 years there is still no evidence of a crime.
The reality is that the Democrats in the House will start off in January calling for investigations of Ivanka Trump over an email thing that falls far short of what they spent most of the 2016 campaign claiming was not worthy of investigation (when it came to Clinton).
They won't find anything that even closely resembles what Hillary did, but will still puff out their chests and act like they did everyone a service.
. if no reasonable prosecutor would bring charges against Hillary for her email behavior, why would anyone believe that "any" prosecutor would demand that Ivanka Trump was breaking the law?.
You don't believe that any responsible prosecutors working for the Department of justice didn't find any credible evidence against Hillary Clinton because he or she was politically biased and refused to charge Clinton with any wrongdoing or breaking the law.
If Hillary Clinton had won the election and her daughter had done the very same thing you would be shouting Lock her up!
Hypocrisy is Cht
From the news coverage the only review of her emails has been conducted by the White House legal counsel.
We will probably have to wait until January of 2019 to see any outside examination of the emails said to be to and from members of the cabinet and staff members. They may just be the day to day stuff that most of us do. But again Scott she did use private email. Despite being informed of the restrictions on the use of private email addresses.
You don't believe that any responsible prosecutors working for the Department of justice didn't find any credible evidence against Hillary Clinton because he or she was politically biased and refused to charge Clinton with any wrongdoing or breaking the law.
comey admitted her crimes and basically laughed them off as something no reasonable prosecutor would charge, alky.
because of who she is.
If Hillary Clinton had won the election and her daughter had done the very same thing you would be shouting Lock her up!
no, you draft dodging hypocrite.
"the very same thing" would mean compliance with the presidential records act, which has been followed by ivanka to the fucking letter.
go back to rehab alky. you still have a lot of drying out to do.
We will probably have to wait until January of 2019 to see any outside examination of the emails
i'm sure. that will keep lil sadam schitt occupied like a cat and a laser pointer.
But again Scott she did use private email. Despite being informed of the restrictions on the use of private email addresses.
imbecile,
white house legal counsel is not going to put him/herself in jeopardy over this. and every email is archived which is more than we can say for clinton. you have to be an absolute fucking moron to find equivalence here, yet here you are.
geezus alky, why don't you find something else to get TDS triggered over? like trump's order to use deadly force at the border. i heard that's a thing today.
I'm as clean as a whistle.
The use of deadly force is old news.
You were probably intoxicated when that came out.
His Thanksgiving day has triggered a Tweetstorm of epic proportions against the President you love.
You can't wait to suck his oddly shaped dick
Roger Amick said...
I'm as clean as a whistle.
yet you post like a drunken sot. i'm trying to give you the benefit of the doubt, alky.
The use of deadly force is old news.
newer than ivanka's email. and much more significant.
His Thanksgiving day has triggered a Tweetstorm of epic proportions against the President you love.
i don't love the guy alky. but i will give him credit for loving our country. unlike 0linsky who hated America with every fiber in his being, and reminds us of that hatred every fucking time he opens his pie hole.
Sure... who told you that, ace?
A little birdie asshole!!! Having Ivanka's lawyer saying there is nothing there is exactly what you said BS about when hillary did the same thing.
then still guilty if after 2.5 years there is still no evidence of a crime.
You seem rather confused Scotty....there is plenty of evidence of a crime....see trumps tax returns!!!!
The reality is that the R's are still investigating hillary's e mails with the latest subpoena's ....They should have been proactive and start the Ivanka review and choose not to....How easy for you to project that the new congress will look at it...LIke Trey and Nunes have for the past 3 years and found nothing......Again, Scotty, take your BS and stick it up trumps fat old white ass !!!
i don't love the guy alky. but i will give him credit for loving our country. u
Really rat hole....You just kiss his fat white ass and swallow....I can understand how that is not love! BWAAAAAAAAAAA
I'm as clean as a whistle.
So then your excuse is that you are just stupid naturally?
We will probably have to wait until January of 2019 to see any outside examination of the emails said to be to and from members of the cabinet and staff members. They may just be the day to day stuff that most of us do. But again Scott she did use private email. Despite being informed of the restrictions on the use of private email addresses.
As was pointed out (by Clinton and all of her surrogates), lot's of government officials have used personal email. They pointed to the fact that Colin Powell used it exclusively for pretty much anything "INTERNAL" that was not confidential. As long as those emails were provided and archived into the system according to the law, this was not considered a "criminal act".
Clinton used her email both internally, as well as externally, and was found to have several dozen threads and over 100 individual emails containing confidential information, some of which was deemed "top secret".
Quite literally Ivanka is accused of the very same behavior that Clinton and her surrogates (as well as people like you) argued was not against the law. For the most part, the issues people had was that she (Clinton) attempted to hide the fact she was using personal email, she used it for non-internal matters, she sent and received classified information, and she didn't properly archive those emails as required by law.
Lastly, she destroyed the server while it was under federal Subpoena.
So I guess the reality her Roger is that some of us are smart enough to tell the difference here.
And some of us is either too stupid, or too inebriated to understand the difference?
So tell me Roger? Are you smart enough to see the obvious difference here?
Denise are you for both ivanki and Hillary being criminally charged?
Since none of Ivanka's crap has been reviewed by anyone else but her lawyer....the legal question is what else is there???"
Emails about kids, wedding , you know.
You are too inebriated to understand the difference?
can someone please remind me why it's a good idea for our government to continue to own and operate amtrak?
https://www.timesunion.com/business/article/Amtrak-probes-what-caused-passengers-cars-to-13414446.php
NOT from the onion or babylon bee:
Dimming the sun: The answer to global warming?
https://www.cnn.com/2018/11/23/health/sun-dimming-aerosols-global-warming-intl-scli/index.html?utm_term=link&utm_content=2018-11-23T15%3A40%3A04&utm_source=twCNN&utm_medium=social
Dimming the sun: The answer to global warming?
Similar hypothesis have been around for years....Thanx for an actual science link....rare from you...LOL
good idea for our government to continue to own and operate amtrak?
Europe and its train infrastructure move people efficiently around without the same political BS of trump wanting to defund the service..Trains are extremely efficient moving people from point a to b with minimal problems...The problem is America's dependence on the auto which generally is a lot quicker for short trips than trains. Until we change the american mindset, train travel will be on the back burner. The need for high speed rail between node points is pressing, but very expensive...Look at the TGV in france....most use train for convenience, unlike here...!!! When in Paris this past spring...hopped trains all around the city and burbs,,,,it was a joy and great way to travel...
Democrats Close to Flipping 40 House Seats
it turns out that the dimming the sun to combat warmyl cooling has been around for a while:
https://twitter.com/twitter/statuses/1065994535199744000
Emails about kids, wedding , you know.
No body knows goat fucker....Wonder how much classified she doesn't know about will be found when looked at???
warmly cooling has been around for a while:
Did't I post that??????
You are too inebriated to understand the difference?
Actually Roger...
I am able not only able to understand, but to actually explain the difference.
You either are not smart enough to understand the difference, or just to partisan to acknowledge that there is a difference.
Which is it?
Lastly, she destroyed the server while it was under federal Subpoena.
Never been proved as fact....nice try CH, typical of your extremist bias....your opinions are your own set of alleged facts...
https://www.factcheck.org/2016/09/the-fbi-files-on-clintons-emails/
Democrats Close to Flipping 40 House Seats
and they can all sit and twiddle their thumbs while Trump gets more judicial nominees confirmed with his Larger Senate Majority!
Lastly, she destroyed the server while it was under federal Subpoena.
Tell me you understand the difference between using bleachbit to wipe a server and deleting emails?
The federal government on Friday released a long-awaited report with an unmistakable message: The impacts of climate change, from deadly wildfires to increasingly debilitating hurricanes and heat waves, are already battering the United States, and the danger of more such catastrophes is worsening.
The report’s authors, who represent numerous federal agencies, say they are more certain than ever that climate change poses a severe threat to Americans’ health and pocketbooks, as well as to the country’s infrastructure and natural resources. And while it avoids policy recommendations, the report’s sense of urgency and alarm stand in stark contrast to the lack of any apparent plan from President Trump to tackle the problems which, according to the government he runs, are increasingly dire.
The congressionally mandated document — the first of its kind issued during the Trump administration — details how climate-fueled disasters and other types of worrying changes are becoming more commonplace around the country and how much worse they could become in the absence of efforts to combat global warming.
Already, western mountain ranges are retaining much less snow throughout the year, threatening water supplies below them. Coral reefs in the Caribbean, Hawaii, Florida, and the U.S.'s Pacific territories are experiencing severe bleaching events. Wildfires are devouring ever larger areas during longer fire seasons. And the country’s sole Arctic state, Alaska, is seeing a staggering rate of warming that has utterly upended its ecosystems, from once ice-clogged coastlines to increasingly thawing permafrost tundras.
The National Climate Assessment’s publication marks the government’s fourth comprehensive look at climate change impacts on the United States since 2000. The last came in 2014. Produced by 13 federal departments and agencies and overseen by the U.S. Global Change Research Program, it stretches well over 1,000 pages in length and draws more definitive, and in some cases startling, conclusions than earlier versions.
The authors argue that global warming “is transforming where and how we live and presents growing challenges to human health and quality of life, the economy, and the natural systems that support us.” And they conclude that humans must act aggressively to adapt to current impacts and mitigate future catastrophes “to avoid substantial damages to the U.S. economy, environment, and human health and well-being over the coming decades.”
“The impacts we’ve seen the last 15 years have continued to get stronger, and that will only continue,” said Gary Yohe, a professor of economics and environmental studies at Wesleyan University, who served on a National Academy of Sciences panel that reviewed the report. “We have wasted 15 years of response time. If we waste another 5 years of response time, the story gets worse. The longer you wait, the faster you have to respond, and the more expensive it will be.”
That urgency is at odds with the stance of the Trump administration, which has rolled back several Obama-era environmental regulations and incentivized the production of fossil fuels. Trump also has said he plans to withdraw the nation from the Paris climate accord, and questioned the science of climate change just last month, telling CBS’s “60 Minutes” that “I don’t know that it’s man-made” and that the warming trend “could very well go back.”
Furthermore, as the northeast faced a cold spell this week, Trump tweeted, “Whatever happened to Global Warming?” This shows a misunderstanding that climate scientists have repeatedly tried to correct — a confusion between daily weather fluctuations and long-term climate trends.
If this was true she would have been indicted. You and Alex Jones have lost your minds.
Well it is true.
And why she wasn't indicted is the question for Lynch and Comey.
here's your plagiarized link alky:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/energy-environment/2018/11/23/major-trump-administration-climate-report-says-damages-are-intensifying-across-country/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.9764cd88c224
no mention of whether their math was majorly fucked like it has been in previous warmyl cooling "studies"
Roger Amick said...
If this was true she would have been indicted.
heh.
lynch was so corrupt she met with bubba on the tarmac in phoenix to work it all out, alky.
dirty cop comey was just the errand boy.
Democrats Close to Flipping 40 House Seats
C.H. Truth said...and they can all sit and twiddle their thumbs
________________________
Funny. Why is Trump so upset and worried about what they will be doing?
Tell me you understand the difference between using bleach bit to wipe a server and deleting emails?
Hey ASSWIPE..... tell me you have absolute proof it was done while under subpoena!!!!! Have you ever thought why she was not indicted for that alleged crime? Tell me you know the difference between opinion and fact....Keep digging Lil Scotty....
is the question for Lynch and Comey.
Comey said the was insufficient evidence to indict....I imagine he still believes that as fact...You on the other hand have nothing!!!!
Twiddle their thumbs right up trumps fat old white ass just like yours.....BTW....like me, you and I will long be dead before trumps picks fuck up the country more than he has already....sad!
Skip to content
FactCheck.org®
FEATURED POSTS › THE WIRE
The
The FBI’s summary of its investigation of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton contradicted some of her past statements about her use of a private email system for government business:
The Clinton campaign previously had indicated that her personal emails were deleted before Clinton received a congressional subpoena on March 4, 2015. But the FBI said her emails were deleted “between March 25-31, 2015” — three weeks after the subpoena. The campaign now says it only learned when the emails were deleted from the FBI report.
Clinton repeatedly had said “everybody in the government with whom I emailed knew that I was using a personal email.” But the FBI said “e-mails from Clinton … did not display her e-mail address,” and only 13 people directly emailed her.
Deleted Emails
The FBI on Sept. 2 — the Friday before Labor Day — released an 11-page summary of its interview of Clinton and a 47-page “factual summary” of its investigation of her email use when she served as secretary of state from January 2009 to February 2013.
The FBI probe focused on whether Clinton or her staff violated federal laws governing the handling of classified information, and whether foreign powers or hostile actors hacked into her private server, which was located at her home in New York.
FBI Director James Comey on July 5 announced that although Clinton and her staff were “extremely careless” in handling classified information, the FBI did not find evidence that their actions were intentional. He declined to pursue criminal charges.
One of the mysteries that the FBI has now cleared up is when Clinton’s emails that were deemed personal were deleted and how it was done.
Clinton’s office disclosed on March 10, 2015, that she gave the State Department 30,490 work-related emails on Dec. 5, 2014, and “chose not to keep” 31,830 emails she deemed “personal.”
“We went through a thorough process to identify all of my work-related emails and deliver them to the State Department,” Clinton said at a press conference that day. “At the end, I chose not to keep my private personal emails.”
It was widely reported at the time that Clinton deleted her personal, private emails. The New York Times, which broke the story of her unusual email arrangement on March 2, 2015, wrote this lead on its press conference story.
New York Times, March 10, 2015: Hillary Rodham Clinton revealed on Tuesday that she had deleted about half her emails from her years as secretary of state, saying she had turned over to the Obama administration all correspondence about government business but had erased records of communications about private matters, like yoga routines, her daughter’s wedding and her mother’s funeral.
But the campaign did not disclose exactly when the personal emails were deleted — which became an issue after Clinton had received a subpoena on March 4, 2015, from the House Select Committee on Benghazi. The committee was seeking emails related to its investigation into the Sept. 11, 2012, deadly attack on the U.S. facilities in Libya.
Clinton and her campaign pushed back at suggestions that the personal emails were deleted while she was under subpoena. In a July 7, 2015, interview, CNN’s Brianna Keilar asked Clinton “how you decided to delete 33,000 emails and how that deletion was executed.” Clinton did not answer the question, instead saying that “previous secretaries of state have said they did the same thing.” (That was not true, as we wrote at the time.)
Keilar questioned whether other secretaries of state “used a personal server and while facing a subpoena, deleted emails from them?” Clinton said that Keilar was making false assumptions, saying, “I’ve never had a subpoena.” Rep. Trey Gowdy, the chairman of the Benghazi committee, immediately accused Clinton of lying after the interview, because, of course, Clinton indeed did receive a subpoena.
More fake science and discrimination for many in our society....fuck transgenders because CH says they do not really exist or have rights....whatta bunch of sick fucking assholes your R's are...!!!!
The report's authors say they are more certain than ever that climate change poses a severe threat to Americans' health and pocketbooks, as well as to the country’s infrastructure and natural resources. The document's sense of urgency stands in stark contrast to the lack of any apparent plan from President Trump to tackle the problems.
By Brady Dennis and Chris Mooney2 hours ago
Trump administration asks Supreme Court to immediately take up transgender military ban
The administration once again asked the high court to bypass the usual legal process. Federal judges so far have prohibited President Trump's order from being implemented.
Think Roger is obsessed over Trump?"
Yes, to the same level he loves booze, dope and under age girls.
Tranny Denise has his panties in a wad.
Yes it was a BLUE WAVE.
Yeah, you may see that blue wave sweep Amy Comey Barret onto the Supreme Court.
The report's authors say they are more certain than ever that climate change poses a severe threat to Americans' health and pocketbooks.
Isn't this just an unsubstantiated opinion?
On April 28th of this year, Governor Brown signed California Senate Bill 1 (SB1), The Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017, increasing the excise tax rates on gasoline and diesel fuel as well as the sales tax rate on diesel fuel.
Please note there are no changes to federal excise taxes at this time.
For fuel purchases that you make effective November 1, 2017:
The state excise tax for gasoline is increasing from 29.7 cents per gallon to 41.7 cents per gallonThe state excise tax for diesel fuel is increasing from 16 cents per gallon to 36 cents per gallonThe state sales tax rate for diesel fuel is increasing from 9.00% to 13.00%.The state sales tax rate for off-road, red diesel fuel remains unchanged at 7.25%The state sales tax rate for gasoline remains unchanged at 2.25%"
Sweet.
an't this just an unsubstantiated opinion?
Asshole, even you should know better.....It is a conclusion they have based on their research and evidence....You on the other hand don't care and therefore it is an opinion,....LOL
Beyond a 10 grand cap, none of it is tax deductible.
.It is a conclusion they have based on their research and evidence....
What evidence? What research?
On April 28th of this year, Governor Brown signed California Senate Bill 1 (SB1), The Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017, increasing the excise tax rates on gasoline and diesel fuel as well as the sales tax rate on diesel fuel.
Please note there are no changes to federal excise taxes at this time.
For fuel purchases that you make effective November 1, 2017:
The state excise tax for gasoline is increasing from 29.7 cents per gallon to 41.7 cents per gallonThe state excise tax for diesel fuel is increasing from 16 cents per gallon to 36 cents per gallonThe state sales tax rate for diesel fuel is increasing from 9.00% to 13.00%.The state sales tax rate for off-road, red diesel fuel remains unchanged at 7.25%The state sales tax rate for gasoline remains unchanged at 2.25%"
Sweet.
Sweet.
Good got them....You on the other hand can't even heat your house, why should you even give a shit on the taxes in Ca......I've advocated a heavy federal tax on gas which would change peoples habit like in europe.....Like better millage, use of trains, alternate fuels.....nothing but pluses!!!!!
What trains?
What evidence? What research?
Are you serious or just stupid????? You evidently did not look at the report....it is full of data and research.....asshole
The researchers found that the average temperature in the US rose 1.2 degrees Fahrenheit from 1951-2010, and an additional 2 degrees more is inevitable by 2050. If we continue business-as-usual (and don't change our energy or agriculture systems to emit less heat-trapping greenhouse gases), the average temperature could go up by as much as 11 degrees by the end of this century.
Sea levels on US coasts have already risen about 8 inches, but we could see as much as 6 feet in some areas by 2100. About $1 trillion of wealth in coastal real estate could be threatened.
Deaths from heat-related causes are projected to increase, as are the frequency and severity of allergic illnesses like asthma. Changing temperatures will also expand the geographic range of disease-carrying insects like ticks and mosquitoes, leaving more people at risk of getting Lyme disease, Zika, West Nile, and dengue.
All of these changes, and the many others projected — including more severe storms, changes in growing seasons, and impacts on infrastructure — could majorly hurt the economy.
What trains?
The trains that will be part of infrastructure updates that will occur with all that extra cash.....Got to think ahead, unlike a loser cultist who thinks gays and women do not deserve rights...
Next asshole to plea to Mueller.....how soon before trumps number comes up????
Roger Stone associate Jerome Corsi in plea negotiations with special counsel
The negotiations with the conservative writer could bring special counsel Robert S. Mueller III's team closer to determining whether President Trump or his advisers were linked to WikiLeaks’ release of hacked Democratic emails in 2016.
OOOPSIE>>>>Trump's foundation could lead to more tweets from the asshole in chief...
Lawsuit alleging Trump used his personal foundation to advance his presidential campaign can proceed, New York judge rules
Justice Saliann Scarpulla ruled that the New York attorney general “adequately alleges” improprieties by the president’s foundation.
By Jonathan O'Connell and David A. Fahrenthold
The trains that will be part of infrastructure updates that will occur with all that extra cash....
In other words vapor ware. Or money thrown down the sewer.
As if they learned nothing after spending billions and billions of dollars and not one running train is in service.
$77 billion so far.
"elevated sections of the high-speed rail under construction in Fresno, Calif. Although it has been dubbed a "bullet train to nowhere," California Gov. Jerry Brown has pushed forward over the years with the state's high-speed rail project.".
Tranny Denise pulls a train.
"California High-Speed Rail Authority shows its projected baseline cost is now $77 billion — up 20 percent from two years ago — and it indicated the cost could rise to as high as $98 billion. The opening date for the Los Angeles-to-San Francisco bullet train has also been delayed by at least four years, to 2033.".
Europe is 3.5 times our density in population and France is smaller than Texas, that’s why trains work there
Idiot
So Rog...
If you believe that Hillary shouldn't have been indicted and did nothing wrong... then why would you want to investigate Ivanka for doing less?
Other than blatant partisan revenge?
The construction repairs and upgrades are all over the place.
Because the President has been saying that she should be locked up even two years after the election. I'm saying lock her up because I enjoy exposing your hypocrisy.
Roger...
The only thing you are exposing is your stupidity.
Everyday, yet, it never stops him.
Final a good post from wrong way Roger.
"
Roger AmickNovember 23, 2018 at 6:58 PM
This comment has been removed by the author
"
Roger, wtf?
"We shouldn’t impeach the president for political reasons and we shouldn’t not impeach the president for political reasons,” Pelosi recently told The Associated Press."
I'm not stupid. Far from it.
You can't win the argument so you resort to insults.
Roger Amick said...
I'm not stupid. Far from it.
well alky, you copy and paste like it's your fucking job, and your entire schtick can be boiled down to -
orange man bad.
the fact is hillary DID break the fucking law, and she SHOULD have been indicted.
the woman is a piece of shit in every sense of the word. but to assholes like you that's a feature, not a bug.
.. then why would you want to investigate Ivanka for doing less?
hey CH.....you're dumbing down to menstral level with that....An investigation is warranted to see exactly what she has done...her and her lawyer claiming only personal e mails were taken down is the same excuse hillary gave and look how that has morphed into the lock her up chants....
n other words vapor ware. Or money thrown down the sewer.
Or needed upgrades as many have argued...The sewer is in the Oval Office and his lies
Fake reporting on GW....should allay menstrals poor grasp of science...
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/23/climate/us-climate-report.html?action=click&module=Top%20Stories&pgtype=Homepage
The major scientific report issued by 13 federal agencies on Friday presents the starkest warnings to date of the consequences of climate change for the United States, predicting that if significant steps are not taken to rein in global warming, the damage will knock as much as 10 percent off the size of the American economy by century’s end.
The report, which was mandated by Congress and made public by the White House, is notable not only for the precision of its calculations and bluntness of its conclusions, but also because its findings are directly at odds with President Trump’s agenda of environmental deregulation, which he asserts will spur economic growth
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/23/climate/us-climate-report.html?action=click&module=To
The President is so ignorant about this and almost everything else the President should understand. This matters because it will effect the lives of millions and greatly displace millions. The harbors will be worthless. Cities will need to be abandoned. Yet you believe that these scientists are attempting to impose a socialist regime by lying about the climate.
This matters because it will effect the lives of millions and greatly displace millions.
Trump could care less.....so sad that so many still take his limited agenda as justification for lying and lack of care....as was evidenced by his annoyed body language when talking to the troops.....Also weighed in AC carriers electromagnetic catapults as too complex to be good.....
thanks for making my point alky.
The harbors will be worthless. Cities will need to be abandoned. Yet you believe that these scientists are attempting to impose a socialist regime by lying about the climate.
geezus drama queen, slow down.
no harbors will be worthless and no cities will be abandoned. remember, we're americans. a people stupid enough to build a city - new orleans - below fucking sea level.
2014 was the year the ice caps were supposed to melt according to al gore.
didn't happen.
i don't think these climate scientists are attempting to impose a socialist regime on us because i don't think they're that ambitious. the lazy fucks have a good gig going, siphoning government $$$$$ to perpetuate their little con. i suppose that's the price we need to pay to keep them from fucking up something genuinely important. michael mann lives to play another day with his hockey sticks, and bill mckibben gets to sit up there on his perch in vermont cranking out another warmyl cooling tome which guys like you will line up to purchase in a fit of virtue signalling.
so be it.
every single fucking doomsday prediction has turned out to be wrong, much like your political predictions.
so relax, alky. pop an opioid and chill. west covina will not be under water in your lifetime, and you should be able to outrun any catastrophe even with the assistance of your walker.
The major scientific report issued by 13 federal agencies on Friday presents the starkest warnings to date
I read the report. It has heavy on alarmist propaganda and unsubstantiated predictions and light on facts. (Damn near non-existent on facts).
It's very much like the print version of of Al Gore's "An Inconvenience Truth".
This matters because it will effect the lives of millions and greatly displace millions.
and the key to it all according to the propeller heads at harvard and yale is to dim the fucking sun.
genius. brilliance on a scale not often encountered outside of cambridge or new haven.
and btw alky, it's Affect, not Effect.
credit the ny times for wanting to provide political cover to governor moonbeam and many other assorted nitwits in california who bear more responsibility for the fires than warmyl cooling ever could.
Why California's Best Strategy Against Wildfire Is Hardly Ever Used
https://www.kqed.org/science/1927354/controlled-burns-can-help-solve-californias-fire-problem-so-why-arent-there-more-of-them
many other assorted nitwits in california who bear more responsibility for the fires than warmly cooling ever could.
BWAAAAAAAAA!!! Trump is in charge of the entire country and is gutting EPA regulations that will add to GW and you give him a pass...LOLOL Brown is about as responsible for the fires as you are.....sad you can't see that....Jerry seems to be rather proactive and national forests are not his....
'Unprecedented Catastrophe'
In a February report, the watchdog Little Hoover Commission concluded that the way California landowners have collectively managed forests is an “unprecedented catastrophe.” In May, Gov. Jerry Brown issued an executive order to improve forest management, and with it, a dramatic change.
Gov Herbal Tea sipper failed.
Alky fainting such a a whoosie
KD said...
Gov Herbal Tea sipper failed.
Like you and your inability to heat your doublewide or actually posting a cogent thought????? How's Koblach do in his run for govner?
Justice Roberts is coming off looking foolish in his argument with trump over judges. He need only look at his own court. Does he deny that justice Ginsberg is predictably liberal and justice Thomas similarly conservative?
Trump wins again.
you're not wrong myballs, but i cut roberts some slack because he said what he's SUPPOSED to say.
no honest person believes him, and i don't think he believes it himself.
our republic runs on bullshit, and a guy like roberts is not immune from spreading some from time to time. the key is accurately identifying it as bullshit and not be like the alky who actually BELIEVES it.
now if you'll excuse me i just heard a thud, looked out the window, and discovered a polar bear that had fallen out of the sky onto my front lawn as it succumbed to warmyl cooling.
This is one instance that Chief Justice Roberts should have used a bit of judicial restraint.
At the very best his comments where naïve And idealistically divorced from reality.
At worse they were ingenious.
Regardless the congress and the court is going to have to deal with the problem of a district judge making policy for the entire country.
He need only look at his own court. Does he deny that justice Ginsberg is predictably liberal and justice Thomas similarly conservative?
All he has to do is look at the Oval Orafice to see trumps history of berating all judges is a slap at the 1/3 of the system that all used to believe in, even you. Now you have swallowed the trump dogma and sucks his manhood like he wants you to...and I wonder why I doubt your ability to posit independent thought other than dissing others....and there is no doubt of you being a loser....LOL
instance that Chief Justice Roberts should have used a bit of judicial restraint.
Horse shit....He finally said something out loud the Jowls Senate have been mute on because trump cut their balls off....yep, emasculated sheep following the asshole in chief in lock step....!!!
i would've preferred roberts used his judicial restraint on his 0linsky-care ruling.
defending the court regarding partisanship is nothing compared to the harm he did by upholding the ACA.
All he has to do is look at the Oval Orafice to see trumps history of berating all judges
Barack Obama too, as well as other presidents.
If you have ever read American history (I know that's beyond you) you will find from Jefferson to Jackson to Lincoln to Roosevelt, presidents complaing about judicial decisions is as old as the republic itself.
1960's eco-movement has been proven 100 % wrong.
Best prediction of that time the US food production would dwindle as mid West become a arid place.
govner?" Cogent lol@denise daily
For the use and accuracy that report is it might as well been compiled by 13 government astrologers.
KD said...
govner?
Yep....your asshattery is boundless....like your stupidity....Now what happens to your boy Koblach?????
Blogger KD said...
1960's eco-movement has been proven 100 % wrong.
How's that goat fucker???? I'm sure your answer will be entertaining and inane.....LOL
1960-1970's
Nearly 50 years later. Nada.
"1. Harvard biologist George Wald estimated that “civilization will end within 15 or 30 years unless immediate action is taken against problems facing mankind.”
2. “We are in an environmental crisis which threatens the survival of this nation, and of the world as a suitable place of human habitation,” wrote Washington University biologist Barry Commoner in the Earth Day issue of the scholarly journal Environment.
3. The day after the first Earth Day, the New York Times editorial page warned, “Man must stop pollution and conserve his resources, not merely to enhance existence but to save the race from intolerable deterioration and possible extinction.”
4. “Population will inevitably and completely outstrip whatever small increases in food supplies we make,” Paul Ehrlich confidently declared in the April 1970 Mademoiselle. “The death rate will increase until at least 100-200 million people per year will be starving to death during the next ten years.”
it might as well been compiled by 13 government astrologers.
Funny a cultist like you saying that especially with your hate for so many facets of society based on your false idol's belief!!!!....LOLOLOL
Actually, even California says Trump is right about the wildfires
President Trump’s critics are belittling him for not buying the lefty narrative that global warming is to blame for the California wildfires. Instead, Trump points to decades of mistakes by government agencies that caused the woodlands to become overly dense and blanketed with highly flammable dead wood and underbrush.
He’s exactly right.
Just ask California officials. Two months ago, the state legislature enacted a measure that would expedite the removal of dead trees and use “prescribed burns” to thin forests. In other words: the very same reforms that Trump is now being mocked for proposing. The September law followed a Gov. Jerry Brown executive order earlier this year that also called for “controlled fires” to improve forest health.
This scientific approach isn’t easily conveyed in Trump’s preferred mode of communication, the 280-character tweet. But University of California forest expert Yana Valachovic conceded in a Washington Post interview that Trump’s “general sentiment is correct — that we need to manage fuels.” That is, to get rid of dangerous buildups of dead and dying trees.
For a century, forest mismanagement has resulted in huge blazes. And while global warming is the favorite culprit among the PC crowd, history shows that California suffered far bigger fires decades ago.
https://nypost.com/2018/11/20/actually-even-california-says-trump-is-right-about-the-wildfires/
Interesting read for those assigning blame to Jerry and others...
https://www.latimes.com/business/hiltzik/la-fi-hiltzik-trump-fires-20181120-story.html
Trump and Zinke unwittingly were demonstrating the difference between ideas and ideologies. Ideas arise from observations from the real world. They require the application of critical intelligence. Ideologies, by contrast, are worldviews that adherents try to impose on reality. They often require a dulling of the intellect and a blindness to what is in front of one’s eyes.
Trump and Zinke have allowed a pro-business, anti-environmental ideology to blind them to the true causes of California’s wildfires. They sound like people who were given one fact to chew on as children and found it so simple and plausible that it drove every other notion out of their heads and has remained a bulwark against thought ever since.
So let’s take a look at the facts.
The core argument of Trump and Zinke is that California’s forests are overgrown because those radical environmentalists have blocked forest-clearing operations such as logging. The result is a buildup of fuel that turns the forests into tinderboxes.
As my colleague Bettina Boxall reported last week, overgrown forests may exist in some parts of the state, but that hasn’t played a role in the Camp or Woolsey fires, which have brought devastation and loss of life in Northern and Southern California in recent days. The fires have mostly swept across chaparral and grass, not forests. Indeed, “the wind-whipped Camp fire tore across areas that burned in 2008 lightning fires and were also later logged,” Boxall reported. “It is not fueled by heavy timber.”
The Woolsey fire, which has burned suburban areas from Oak Park to Malibu, was not near any forests, as my colleagues Alejandra Reyes-Velarde and Joseph Serna observe.
In any case, California forest management policies aren’t as important in the state as federal policy. That’s because the largest owner of forestland in California is the federal government, with 57%. State and local agencies own 3%. The rest is in the hands of Native American tribes, corporations or families (most of whom own fewer than 50 acres).
Thanx for playing goat fucker.....LOL
Actually, even California says Trump is right about the wildfires
Hey asshole, as I pointed out yesterday...the author of that opinion is a retired R politician with no standing in science let alone anything else....
1960's the birth of stupidity and DOG.
Targeting birth of humans.
As predicted, the goat fucker has again provided a big laugh at his attempt at answering a simple question...Still no idea what happened to your asshole Koblach!!! Where did he go???? Hell would be appropriate with you!!!
lo iq commie, unknown to those who know him, again desperately lashes out.
And I see has spent the whole holiday weekend doing so.
He really must have gotten the turkey asshole once again.
Guess we should have pity on him, but the combination of lack of brains and "fowl" mouth make for easy pickens. I'm sure he will continue being the bitter old white man he is.
ROFLMFAO !!!
And I see has spent the whole holiday weekend doing so.
And our coward asshole got bitchslapped and reacts just like the asshole in chief....Lie and make shit up....it is all a low life fucking loser R has other than just being stupid....LOLOLOLOLOL Remember you posted an opinion from a non entity R, and got caught... the best part is you didn't know....it is always a please cramming it up your trumpian ass!!!!
actually lo iq commieI was totally aware that this was an opinion piece. It came from the opinion section so that should have given you a clue. However the opinion has facts that are true and to which you obviously can't address.
Are you foaming from the mouth yet?
I suspect your physical health must be as bad as your mental health.
ROFLMFAO at the lo iq retard, I'll let you continue to spend the weekend in your self constructed cesspool.
It came from the opinion section so that should have given you a clue. However the opinion has facts that are true and to which you obviously can't address.
And you got bitchslapped because you had no clue and posted as...."Actually, even California says Trump is right about the wildfires" a complete fabrication and lie which confirmed your stupidity....You lose again coward, just like the coward trump, hiding behind the WH and calling instead of visiting a war zone....Keep digging, you have be rather entertaining trying to show off with your abject stupidity and lack of an original thought....loser...LOLOLOL
1960' s eco predictions 100 % wrong.
Peak oil, lol really my fab. We have more oil today. The Earth makes oil.
How. You don't know says more about you.
" what happened Koblach ?"
He lost. We in Kansas commonly vote in both Dems and Republicans as our Govenor.
I told you this repeatedly.
Denise "Train" in .CA is costing far more then the voters approved. It is projected to take its first passenger in 2033.
Or needed upgrades as many have argued..
One problem. There is nothing to upgrade. Unless you think vapor ware is an upgrade to fraud ware.
An opinion piece in the New York Post is not a credible source of information about the California wild fires.
Even the French has had enough of high gas taxes.
Battlefield on the Champs Elysee: Fire rages in Paris as riot police fire water cannon and tear gas while protesters lob fireworks in return - as thousands take to streets in fury over Macron's fuel tax rise
Will Californians similarly figure out they are getting screwed? I know of at least one who will never figure it out.
Even the French has had enough of high gas taxes.
So.....they have been paying 5 buck a gallon for years....
Denise "Train" in .CA is costing far more then the voters approved
And the trump tax breaks are on the way to a trillion dollar deficit....while not paying for itself...and you keep slurping....goat fucker...still can't heat you own hovel without a subsidy LOLOL
I told you this repeatedly.
Bullshti your boy lost and K now has A D as its head...at least there are some smart people in KS, you not being one of them!!
Ann Coulter suggests she should have voted for Hillary: ‘Might have gotten a wall’
Ann Coulter has suggested that she and others should have perhaps voted for Hillary Clinton in the 2016 presidential election given the former Secretary of State’s recent comments supporting stricter migration policies.
Coulter retweeted an Axios post that said: “Hillary Clinton told the Guardian that Europe ‘needs to get a handle on migration’ and that leaders must send a message that ‘we are not going to be able to continue to provide refuge and support.’”
The conservative pundit then added the comment, “Maybe we should have voted for her. Might have gotten a wall.”
Though Coulter initially welcomed the Trump administration with great enthusiasm, she has since become a vocal critic, frequently blasting President Trump for not taking the hard line on immigration that he promised.
She said in a speech at Columbia University: “I KNEW HE WAS A SHALLOW, LAZY IGNORMUS and I didn’t care.* It kind of breaks my heart. He’s not giving us what he promised at every single campaign stop.”
More recently, she said of the president and, in large part, his promise to build a wall along the U.S.-Mexico border, “Wow, I’ve never seen such a BAD DEALMAKER.”
_____________
*Chtruth and his patsies that inhabit this site didn't care either.
*IGNORAMUS
So.....they have been paying 5 buck a gallon for years...
And at least 4 bucks of that is taxes. No wonder they are rioting.
Well James we do find you quoting Ann Coulter quite amusing. Your hackery is so bad that it borders on farce.
This is why rrb and the President support the Senate candidate in Mississippi.
Cindy Hyde-Smith, the Republican Mississipi senator who made comments condoning “public hangings,” attended a “segregated” school when she was younger, the Jackson Free Press reported Friday after unearthing a 1975 yearbook photo.
The school, Lawrence County Academy, was set up for white parents to avoid sending their children to school with black children, according to the Free Press. Many such schools, dubbed “segregation academies,” were created in the South following desegregation as inexpensive, private educational options.
Hyde-Smith is identified in a caption beneath the yearbook photograph, which shows a row of cheerleaders smiling as they lie on the ground, propped up on their elbows, as a girl dressed in what seems to be Civil War–era regalia stands in the center holding an apparent Confederate flag.
Lawrence County Academy was established in 1970, one year after the U.S. Supreme Court ordered Mississippi to desegregate its schools. For 15 years after desegregation became law of the land, Mississippi dragged its feet on integrating black and white students.
Huffington Post
Gas is $3.29.9
And Roger's parents were Nazis therefore Roger is a Nazi.
See how that works?
at least 4 bucks of that is taxes. No wonder they are rioting.
Well good for them....we should also be marching in the streets to demand truth from washington and the ballooning deficit driven by tax cuts!!!.....We also should be paying 4 bucks a gallon for taxes....you want to cut imports and waste in half.....that would do it!!!! Maybe hyde smith can invite you to a lynching.....dumbass
The ralliing cry is "We demand more taxes to help the bankers!!" ? Yeah, sure Dennis, you go with that.
The ralliing cry is "We demand more taxes to help the bankers!!"
You post a lot of fucked up things cramps....but that surely takes the trumpian lulu award....LOLOLOLOL
Just who do you thing buys most the the treasury bonds the US sells to float the deficit?
Shit for brains?
Who do I thing cramps????? Who is running up the deficit to record levels, the bankers?????? BTW....the chinese buy most of our debt followed by intra government and other governments....Suggest you take a remedial course in reality instead of making shit up......asshole..
https://www.thebalance.com/who-owns-the-u-s-national-debt-3306124
Suggest you look shit up so I don't have to cram it up your old white bigoted ass....
Not the Republicans;
As Predicted, GOP Tax Cuts Prompt Record Tax Revenues
Remember when Democrats mocked last year’s tax-cut legislation? And Nancy Pelosi called the tax breaks for Americans “crumbs”?
But President Trump and congressional Republicans said they would ignite a booming economy and actually increase federal tax collections from greater economic activity including more consumer spending, business investments, higher wages and even employee bonuses.
Well, guess what? Just 47 weeks after Trump put his flamboyant signature on the bill, it’s all happening.
Unemployment is at an historic low. Employment is at an all-time high. Wagers are growing after years of stagnation.
And now from all that increased economic activity, the federal government has just reported historic record tax revenues in October, the first month of the new fiscal year, of $252,692,000,000.
That’s more than $11.4 billion above revenue for October of last year, which was the previous record tax revenue for an October.
And it did this by collecting more than $3 billion less in personal income taxes, thanks to the tax cuts.
The new revenues were the result of increased business taxes because of increased business. Here’s how much different it was:
Corporation income tax receipts to the U.S. Treasury this year in October were a whopping $8,000,000,000. This compares to the previous October’s $3.8 billion.
How. You don't know says more about you.
" what happened Koblach ?"
He lost. We in Kansas commonly vote in both Dems and Republicans as our Govenor.
I told you this repeatedly.
Good Morning Denise.
I will take pity upon my lesser and continue to educate.
Post a Comment