The decline — from 43% in favor in December to 36% now — stems largely from a change in Democratic views on impeaching the President. In December, 80% of self-identified Democrats said they were in favor of impeachment — that now stands at 68%, a 12-point dip. Among independents and Republicans, support for impeachment has fallen 3 points over the same time.
Another glaring example of media hypocrisy.
52 comments:
Roger is a cut n paste parrot.
He can't think on his own.
Alky, what is your definition of these non-sense terms.
1, income inequality
2, basic income <$ amount>
The Socialist Democrats are losing on so many fronts.
Jobs are plentiful. So many jobs. Americans are more able to live the good life.
Lost Years Poverty Rate. 13.9%
Trump Years Poverty Rate 12.3%
More of Pres. Trump's. " magic wand "
An interesting comparison?
Support for impeachment drops to 36%
Wow...Nancy's message worked....and the goat fucking asshole posts what is left of his brain with abject stupidity.....no surprise again!!!!! BWAAAAAAAAAA!!!!
Donnie stealing from military kids future to protect the fake threat from the south.....be proud, goat fucker....just because your spawn didn't get screwed, I want the current crop to suffer so I can think I am safe..!!!!!!
TODAY'S NY Post...
Trump wants Kraft to celebrate SB win at White House despite prostitution bust
Schwarzenegger says Trump should terminate McCain attacks
Ex-Florida spa owner denies selling access to Trump
Raising McCain: Trump says no one thanked him for late senator's funeral in new gripe
The Trump administration has put forth a plan that, if approved, would take away money from youth education programs and schools attended by the children of US service members — and instead use it to fund the president’s southern border wall.
Pentagon officials on Monday offered to slice up some of the military’s $1.2 billion in educational funds — sending a list to Congress of proposed projects that could be cut.
The Department of Defense suggested redirecting about $800 million, according to Reuters.
The money was reportedly set aside for projects related to militarily educational facilities, some of which aren’t scheduled until far into the future. Officials have proposed using the funds to build sections of the border wall and replacing them later.
The military has previously said it would not make financial cuts to service member housing and would instead look to elementary and middle school funding for support.
Officials have offered to use $13 million — which was being saved for the construction of a “Child Development Center” and new buildings at West Point — on the border wall.
Donnie is pissing off some on faux news.....the only thing they listen to is money from sponsors....hopefully this will seep its way to the tucker and hannity arena.....but I don't have much optimism....
Hosts on Fox News tore into President Donald Trump on Wednesday over his latest disparaging remarks about late Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.).
During a speech at a military tank plant in Lima, Ohio, Trump complained that he “didn’t get a thank you” for approving McCain’s funeral arrangements. It was the fourth time in the past week that the president attacked McCain, who died seven months ago.
Shep Smith, the host of “Shepard Smith Reporting,” explained how Trump was “fighting with a dead guy again today, a dead war hero.”
“Crazy,” he said.
Fox News legal analyst Andrew Napolitano told Smith he doubted whether Trump “scores points even with his strong Republican supporters” over his frequent outbursts about the late senator.
“Whether you agree with John McCain or disagree with his attitude about war, he was a great human being and a historic figure, and there’s no logical reason to make these arguments after he’s dead,” Napolitano added.
“Your World” host Neil Cavuto also questioned Trump’s interpretation of events when it came to the president’s criticism of McCain opposing GOP attempts to repeal the Affordable Care Act.
And Brit Hume, Fox News’ senior political analyst, asked on Twitter why Trump bothers with the feud at all:
Speaker in Name Only Polosi .
Ran on new middle income tax cuts and Trump Impeachment .
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/editorials
Speaker Luddite Cortez .
KD the goat fucking idiot is scared shitless out of a little freshman congress critter.....why is he so scared of such an insignificant person like her?? I know...he is another women hating R who thinks women should be seen and not heard....just like donnie who has to buy women for sex and marriage....BWAAAAAA!!!!!
Luddite Cortez wants to destroy the US Economy.
She has 112 US Senators and US Representatives agreeing with her.
Certainly, there was almost no media buzz in regards to impeaching President Obama, even when a third of the public thought it was the thing to do.
well, the demonstrable high crimes and misdemeanors which were legion notwithstanding, there would never have been the political will to impeach the first half-rican american magic negro president.
0linsky's election and immaculation to the presidency was historic. he could've massacred every kid on the white house lawn during the easter egg hunt, and gotten away with it. any criticism of that act dismissed and declared to be ray-ciss.
it's amazing when you think about it. since goldwater we're on about our fourth hitler* since real actual hitler. yet the only crimes against the nation i witness are during democrat presidencies. funny that.
* - h/t: Kathy Shaidle
well, the demonstrable high crimes and misdemeanors which were legion notwithstanding
Notwithstanding what......there were none where the donnie has a litany of indiscretions in both his lives that should land him in Jail.....especially once he leaves office....when he can't pardon himself....So many crimes, and you just slurp and protect like the giant ass you are.....LOLOLOL
No matter how often I teach The Three Socialist Stooges of CHT , they, collectively can't learn. Simply incapable .
She has 112 US Senators and US Representatives agreeing with her.
Our feckless goat fucking idiot continues projecting like a donnie ass as usual....a little girl is causing him to loose sleep that his comfy losing existence may change for the better.....funny he don't work or adds anything to society and is compulsive about a 28 year old who has done more in a short 6 months than he has done in his whole menial life.....maybe he should run and help fix the country instead of just acting like an asshole....
2018 is the year I turn 50, and I have a long memory. I remember with great clarity Dr. Helen Caldicott. Dr. Caldicott was an Aussie fruitloop who believed that President Reagan was going to blow up the world. In the ’80s, Caldicott ran an outfit called Physicians for Social Responsibility. Like Dr. Lee, she too had a messiah complex. She saw the world as a two-character play: her vs. Reagan. Sensible physician vs. psychopathic madman.
In 1983, she managed to wrangle a 75-minute meeting with Reagan. Note that that’s 75 minutes more than Lee has ever spent with Trump. Following the meeting, Caldicott announced to the world that she had “diagnosed” Reagan as having a “paranoid delusional” disorder. In a series of talks she gave throughout 1983 and ’84, she declared, over and over again, that if Reagan were to be reelected in 1984, nuclear war would become not only “inevitable,” but a “mathematical certainty.” Yes, she used that term. “Mathematical certainty.” Because, she swore, her 75-minute “diagnosis” was faultless. Trust her; she’s a doctor.
1984 is a world away from where we are now. Back then, psychiatrists were willing to speak out against Dr. Caldicott’s fearmongering. In October 1984, Harvard Medical School child psychiatrist Dr. Robert Coles told The New York Times, ‘‘When she [Caldicott] gets up and tells people it is a mathematical certainty you will be dead in four years if Reagan is re-elected, that makes people angry.” He accused Caldicott of inflicting psychological damage upon children with her scare tactics.
Where are any similar voices of integrity from the psychiatric field now?
https://www.takimag.com/article/witch_doctors_choke_on_trumps_tea_leaves_david_cole/
but the blog drunk insists that george conway's armchair psychiatric evaluation matters.
alrighty then...
US Misery Index
The Lost Years Jan 2016 = 6.273%
The Trump Economy Feb 2019 5.324%
Let's end Capitalism embrace Socialism.
"The blog drunk" RRB
Lol.
Correcting our village idiots post.....seems trumps misery is wearing on the economy!!!!! BWAAAAAAAAA!!!!
US Misery Index is at a current level of 6.850, a decrease of 0.022 or 0.32% from last month. This is an increase of 0.8215 or 13.63% from last year and is low
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/trump-slams-trey-gowdy-benghazi-hearings-a-total-disaster
Republican Rep. Trey Gowdy sent waves through the GOP presidential race with word he will endorse Marco Rubio. The announcement — the Rubio campaign is touting Gowdy's upcoming trip to Iowa on Rubio's behalf — became the subject of angry tweets from Donald Trump supporters, who quickly denounced Gowdy as a RINO and a fake conservative. (Gowdy's rating from the American Conservative Union is a near-perfect 97 for the nearly five years he has served in the House.)
Trump, in a Sunday-morning appearance on "Fox and Friends," took a different tack. "I hope [Gowdy] does a better job than he did, frankly, at the Benghazi hearings, because they were a total disaster," Trump said, referring to the Oct. 22 hearing in which Gowdy, chairman of the Select Committee on Benghazi, called Hillary Clinton to testify. After the marathon hearing, some observers on both sides of the political aisle concluded that Republicans had failed to lay a glove on Clinton.
"[Gowdy] did not win with those hearings," Trump said. "It was not good for Republicans and for the country. I hope he does a lot better for Marco than he did with the Benghazi hearings."
Subscribe to our expanded print magazine for more politics, deeper culture, better access
Watch Full Screen to Skip Ads
Trump also tweeted Sunday morning: "Rubio finally gets an endorsement — from Benghazi loser Gowdy." In another tweet Trump said, "Face it, Trey Gowdy failed miserably on Benghazi. He allowed it to drag out and in the end, let Hillary get away with murder."
Like so many Trump attacks, it seems likely Trump's hit on Gowdy will incite denunciations of Trump for going after a conservative icon, and at the same time a debate on the substance of Trump's attack, in this case, the effectiveness of the Hillary Benghazi hearing. That's how Trump shaped the public conversation.
When is it time to have a national conversation about John McCain?
The media elites and Republican establishment are in a tizzy because President Trump continues to hit one of their political sacred cows: John McCain. These clowns loved John McCain because he was a "moderate," he actively pursued the holy globalist agenda and could always be counted on to publicly knee-cap the "deplorables" and the hateful tea party-types. There was a brief time, during McCain's presidential campaign, when he fell out of favor and the cool kids called him all the names they call us, sexist/racist etc., but all was good when Obama was safely in office. He was back at the popular kids table in the lunch room.
Recently, information has surfaced that McCain was an active participant in the coup against Trump. McCain and his associates were actively circulating a compilation of gossip and RUSSIAN-generated disinformation, alleging Trump and some of his associates were compromised and working for the RUSSIANS. McCain was promoting the idea that Trump was committing espionage. ESPIONAGE. This was after Trump won the election. He was the president-elect. McCain was trying to overthrow the president.
Now, these media and establishment conspiracy theorists have the vapors because Trump is a little pissed off and is fighting back. Can you blame him? We are scolded that we are not to speak ill of the dead. Since when? Less than two weeks ago, AOC (Chiquita Kruschev) called Ronald Reagan a racist. I didn't hear a peep about not speaking ill of the dead after that, did you?
“A perfect example of how special interests and the powerful have pitted white working class Americans against brown and black working class Americans is Reaganism in the ’80s when he started talking about welfare queens,” Ocasio-Cortez said in Austin, Texas. (The welfare queen he was talking about was white, but whatever.)
Why are people being shushed and bullied out of talking about McCain's actions? I'm not denigrating his service to his country but does that give him a free pass on anything else he has ever done that influences our political industry?
https://pjmedia.com/blog/liveblogevent/live-blog-212/entry-256366/
Unknown said...
Correcting our village idiots post
looks like lo iq doesn't even realize he is the board's village idiot.
and proves it every day.
proudly
ROFLMFAO !!!
Total bullshit cut and paste by the blog racist Republican bastard who can't write in English.
Conspiracy theories are amazing on the right.
Recently, information has surfaced that McCain was an active participant in the coup against Trump. McCain and his associates were actively circulating a compilation of gossip and RUSSIAN-generated disinformation, alleging Trump and some of his associates were compromised and working for the RUSSIANS. McCain was promoting the idea that Trump was committing espionage. ESPIONAGE. This was after Trump won the election. He was the president-elect. McCain was trying to overthrow the president.
By the way, the predictions on the economy show growth will be the same as the lost years era. Or maybe even a recession during the election in 2020.
By a doctor who was in the FBI
He may specifically mention or attempt to brag/exaggerate about his genitalia size. He will focus his photo-opts on visiting corporations and manufacturing facilities instead of school children, the poor, and the military. He will not be very friendly to children and may even make one cry during a photo-op or school visit. When interacting with military personnel, at first he will not be respectful enough when meeting soldiers and members of the military. He will likely offend military families and supporters with an off the cuff remark. This will not be as severe as he did with Mr. and Mrs. Kahn, but at first he will take some criticism for not being respectful enough. Over time, he will see how important respecting the military is for a President’s approval and he will begin to show more respect and photo-ops. He will continue to clash with reporters and the press. More and more journalists, even popular network journalists, will boldly condemn and speak out against Trump as his popularity decreases. He will secretly devote time each day to receive status reports for his own business and financial interests, despite the business being managed by his children and the conflict of interest. Will likely use Air Force One to visit his own golf courses, hotels, resorts, and projects to check on things, or he will plan official visits to areas near them so that he can visit his properties. He will travel by helicopter more than other presidents in the past in order to view his properties from a closer vantage point.
Section 2 – The Profile of Donald Trump In his book Dangerous Personalities, author and former FBI agent David Navarro explains that there are four personality types that are responsible for much of the crime and difficulty on our planet. Thus there are four separate personality profiles for each that the FBI uses. These personality types are Narcissist, Predator, Emotionally Unstable, and Paranoid. Each has a scale, therefore some people may be more mild while others are extreme and actually dangerous. My first book teaches how to use FBI profiling on coworkers of these types in order to protect your job and your well being at work. For this book, we only need to focus on one of these types. In honest and no uncertain terms, Donald Trump is the textbook example of a narcissist of the highest degree. Thus we now turn our attention to the general profile of a narcissist in this section before proceeding to Donald Trump’s future behavior. Now what is a narcissist? Unfortunately, people confuse the definition with someone who simply cares too much about their appearance or likes looking at themselves in the mirror. A narcissist is much more than that. They are essentially a psychopath who lacks any real empathy. The thought process of the narcissist can be summed up with these three thoughts: It’s all about me Other people are “paper people” and do not matter The rules don’t apply to me It’s All About Me.
When is it time to have a national conversation about John McCain?
When the R's in senate finally speak about his exemplar record of service...until then all you fucking idiots have once again shown why your party is dying a death of a thousand cuts.......and to think I voted for bush 1......assholes...
No sane person thinks Trump is Putin's puppet.
Except those TDS affected people on the left.
The lonely loonies.
Blogger Roger Amick said...
Total bullshit cut and paste by the blog racist Republican bastard who can't write in English.
TRANSLATION:
the blog drunk cannot refute one word of it, just like he could not substantiate -
Blogger Roger Amick said...
White nationalists have infiltrated the Republican party at the invitation by the President.
- when challenged by our host.
By a doctor who was in the FBI
who has never examined trump, spoken directly to trump, been in trump's presence, or in any way shape or form is qualified to pontificate on trump's mental or physical health or fitness for office.
good job, cirrhosis boy.
this is reminiscent of dan rather's fake but accurate shenanigans.
heh.
hey rog, whatever happened to dr.bandy ree anyway? you don't talk about her anymore.
RRB, take your foot off of Homeless Alky's neck.
"TRANSLATION:
the blog drunk cannot refute one word of it, just like he could not substantiate -"
Roger likes to bring economic issues to this blog then run off .
George Conway Goes After Trump Again
George Conway, the husband of White House counselor Kellyanne Conway, lashed out at President Trump in a new series of tweets, saying that he is a liar and “the worst kind of dumb,” The Hill reports.
Said Conway: “To understand Trump ‘you have to look at everything through the prism of his narcissism.’ Once you do that, pretty much everything makes sense.”
He added: “He lies even when it makes no sense to lie. As one of his lawyers once told me, Trump couldn’t be allowed to talk to Mueller because ‘he’d lie his ass off.'”
roger has simply retreated to his lair to compile a stack of copy/paste gibberish. it eases him of the burden of thinking for himself, and then translating those thoughts into telligible prose.
when he posts little nuggets of brain droppings such as this -
Blogger Roger Amick said...
Total bullshit cut and paste by the blog racist Republican bastard who can't write in English.
- you are safe to assume with absolute certainty that the blog drunk is psychologically projecting yet again.
it used to be mildly and morbidly entertaining. having a virtual front row seat to a descent into madness that is. completely driven by an legally and duly elected official. i suppose to allow one's life to be totally consumed and driven by politics is mental illness in and of itself. but what used to be entertaining has now become tiresome and pedestrian. i live in NY. i'm surrounded by TDS.
well, let's see what copy/pastes of others thoughts rog was able to accumulate.
he'll be back.
it's not like he has anywhere else to be.
https://www.aol.com/article/news/2019/03/21/fox-news-hosts-tear-into-donald-trump-over-john-mccain-attacks/23697509/
I'll just leave this here
Former Colorado governor John Hickenlooper recalled a surprising moment during a CNN town hall Wednesday evening telling, an audience on live television that he once took his mother to see “Deep Throat.”
“I didn’t know what an X-movie was. We thought it was a little naughty but we didn’t think it was that bad,” the 2020 presidential candidate recalled, saying the original plan was to see the famously phonographic film with his friend. Hickenlooper invited his mother so she wouldn’t be at home lonely — never expecting she would accept his invitation.
oh look the pederast
An old Joe biden video has surfaced that has him calling packing the supreme court a bonehead idea.
Oops.
Speaking of pedophiles
Mike Cernovich
Verified account
@Cernovich
This Jeffrey Epstein lawsuit is really odd and getting weirder every day, so I'm going to go into the weeds for a minute. This will either be interesting or tedious, but mostly should be interesting!
First, the latest article on the lawsuit
https://twitter.com/Cernovich/status/1108442285371318272
Mike Cernovich
Verified account
@Cernovich
At the 11th hour, a John Doe filed an amicus brief asking the court to keep the records in the Epstein case sealed.
Ask any lawyer - this filing is unusual and inappropriate.
It gets more interesting....
The lawyer who filed the brief?
He worked for Mueller and Comey.
WTF
Candidates Propose Changes To Fix Flaw In Constitution That Allows Republicans To Be Elected
WASHINGTON, D.C.—A number of Democrats have proposed changes to the structure of government that they think would help them win, such as lowering the voting age to 16, abolishing the Electoral College, packing the Supreme Court, and changing how Senate seats are allocated. Now, though, some of the Democratic presidential hopefuls are attacking the heart of the matter: what they call an “outdated Constitution” that sometimes “allows Republicans to be elected.”
“The election of Trump exposed a fundamental flaw in the Constitution,” Senator Elizabeth Warren said at a campaign rally. “Everyone said Hillary was supposed to win, but she didn’t. And we’re afraid that in the future, maybe Democrats won’t win again. We can't allow that.”
Warren and numerous other Democrats have proposed an amendment to the Constitution that will state that only Democrats are allowed to win elections, a proposal they say will increase election “fairness.”
“When I think about someone other than a Democrat being elected,” said Senator Cory Booker, “it makes me so mad.” He then raised his fists and shook them, a gesture indicating he was mad. Candidate Beto O’Rourke also spoke out for the proposed amendment, though all he got out was, “It’s a great--” before skateboarding into a tree and quickly fleeing the scene of the incident.
None of the candidates have explained how they propose to get two-thirds of the states to agree with this amendment, though this has led them to point out another flaw with the Constitution: that it’s “way too hard to change when you suddenly think you have a much better idea.”
An old Joe biden video has surfaced that has him calling packing the supreme court a bonehead idea.
Oops.
sadly, it's not an oops. he's a democrat, therefore he's given the luxury of having a position that has 'evolved' for political expedience.
just like 0linsky on gay marriage.
What Donald Trump was up to while John McCain was a prisoner of war:
It was the spring of 1968, and Donald Trump had it good.
He was 21 years old and handsome with a full head of hair. He avoided the Vietnam War draft on his way to earning an Ivy League degree. He was fond of fancy dinners, beautiful women and outrageous clubs. Most important, he had a job in his father's real estate company and a brain bursting with money-making ideas that would make him a billionaire.
"When I graduated from college, I had a net worth of perhaps $200,000," he said in his 1987 autobiography "Trump: The Art of the Deal," written with Tony Schwartz. (That's about $1.4 million in 2015 dollars.) "I had my eye on Manhattan."
More than 8,000 miles away, John McCain sat in a tiny, squalid North Vietnamese prison cell. The Navy pilot's body was broken from a plane crash, starvation, botched operations and months of torture.
As Trump was preparing to take Manhattan, McCain was trying to relearn how to walk.
The stark contrast in their fortunes was thrown into sharp relief Saturday when Trump belittled McCain during a campaign speech in Iowa.
"He's not a war hero," Trump said of McCain.
"He's a war hero because he was captured," Trump said sarcastically. "I like people that weren't captured."
Trump's comments drew scorn from his fellow Republican presidential contenders. But The Donald didn't back down.
"When I left the room, it was a total standing ovation," he told ABC News in reference to his already infamous Iowa speech. "It was wonderful to see. Nobody was insulted."
In fact, a lot of people were insulted.
"John McCain is a hero, a man of grit and guts and character personified," Secretary of State John F. Kerry said in a statement. "He served and bled and endured unspeakable acts of torture. His captors broke his bones, but they couldn't break his spirit, which is why he refused early release when he had the chance. That's heroism, pure and simple, and it is unimpeachable."
If Trump doesn't think that that's heroic, then what, exactly, is admirable in his eyes?
Rosie memos
@almostjingo
Stay classy @instagram (owned by @facebook) apparently violent images of the @POTUS with hashtags about assassination and raping republicans do not violate community guidelines BUT posts from @Scavino45 do? Disgusting.
https://twitter.com/almostjingo/status/1108605539406102528
unbelievable what these tech giants allow and disallow
Blogger Roger Amick said...
What Donald Trump was up to while John McCain was a prisoner of war:
boy alky... the way you're on this mcstain thing it's almost like you're proud of your hypocrisy and you've chosen to wear it like a badge of honor.
i'm old enough to remember when you hated the guy, you peddled NY Times story that he was banging his intern/assistant during his presidential campaign as the gospel truth, and his "bomb, bomb, bomb; bomb, bomb iran" wisecrack had you shitting your depends.
but please, carry on. i knew you'd be back with an alky-lanche of posts that were not your own, and you certainly did not disappoint.
I forgot about the Times story and you are right Roger was peddling the hell out of it
None of these facts are addressed in McCain’s book. Simpson and Fusion GPS are not mentioned, even though Simpson was McCain’s source for the dossier. There was no acknowledgement that McCain and his associates were complicit—either unwittingly or intentionally—in a wide ranging plot to sabotage the incoming president of the United States by sowing doubt about the legitimacy of the election and Trump’s alleged fealty to Putin. Instead, McCain wrote that anyone who doubts his actions can “go to hell.”
Perhaps the reason why McCain overlooked those inconvenient details is because he was a central figure in fueling hysteria about Russian influence in the election after Trump won the presidency. At the same time, Kramer was working behind the scenes along with Simpson to legitimize the dossier, including confirming the explosive news that McCain personally delivered it to Comey in early December 2016. Collectively, it produced the fertile soil from which the Trump-Russia election collusion hoax would grow after Trump’s inauguration.
Sadly, rather than use his stature and leadership skills to soothe a nation rocked by the surprise election of Donald Trump, John McCain instead poured rhetorical gasoline on a smoldering body politic. Working in tandem with shell-shocked Obama officials desperate to find an excuse for Hillary Clinton’s humiliating loss, McCain publicly pounded the idea that Russian “hacking” was the reason for her defeat. His accusations escalated from initially decrying Russia’s sketchy interference in the election to calling it an “act of war” by December 2016.
McCain threatened Trump not to “reset” relations with Putin and outlined a number of sanctions the new president should impose. “There are a lot of more stringent measures we should take, after all it was an attack on the United States of America and and an attack on the fundamentals of our democracy,” McCain warned in December 2016. “If you destroy the free elections, then you destroy democracy.” In a fact-free interview on “Face the Nation” on December 11, 2016, McCain said he wanted a select committee to investigate Russia for “hacking into the United States 2016 election campaign.”
Keep in mind, the only evidence of an “attack on the fundamentals of our democracy” at the time was a vague October 7, 2016 notice from Obama’s highly-politicized intelligence community that insinuated Russian actors were behind various email hacking activities. Obama had ordered a full scale review, which resulted in a questionable January 2017 report alleging that Putin “aspired to help” Trump win the presidency. The evidence to support the claim remains highly classified.
On January 5, 2017, the day before that report was released, McCain scheduled a hearing of his committee featuring testimony by then-Director of National Intelligence James Clapper to push the Russian election “hacking” plotline. McCain had an interesting exchange at one point with Clapper, whom the Arizona Republican lauded for his “integrity and professionalism.”
"McCain: If they succeeded in changing the results of the election, which none of us believe they were, that would have to constitute an attack on the United States of America because of the effects had they succeeded. Would you agree with that?
Clapper: We have no way of gauging the impact . . . it had on choices that the electorate made. There’s no way for us to gauge that."
See how that worked? No one directly is saying that the Russians changed the outcome but we kind of are because there’s no way to know that they didn’t.
https://amgreatness.com/2019/03/20/mccains-key-role-in-fueling-post-election-trump-russia-hysteria/
Trump Didn't Call Neo-Nazis 'Fine People.' Here's Proof.
News anchors and pundits have repeated lies about Donald Trump and race so often that some of these narratives seem true, even to Americans who embrace the fruits of the president’s policies. The most pernicious and pervasive of these lies is the “Charlottesville Hoax,” the fake-news fabrication that he described the neo-Nazis who rallied in Charlottesville, Va., in August 2017 as “fine people.”
Just last week I exposed this falsehood, yet again, when CNN contributor Keith Boykin falsely stated, “When violent people were marching with tiki torches in Charlottesville, the president said they were ‘very fine people.’” When I objected and detailed that Trump’s “fine people on both sides” observation clearly related to those on both sides of the Confederate monument debate, and specifically excluded the violent supremacists, anchor Erin Burnett interjected, “He [Trump] didn’t say it was on the monument debate at all. No, they didn’t even try to use that defense. It’s a good one, but no one’s even tried to use it, so you just used it now.”
My colleagues seem prepared to dispute our own network’s correct contemporaneous reporting and the very clear transcripts of the now-infamous Trump Tower presser on the tragic events of Charlottesville. Here are the unambiguous actual words of President Trump:
“Excuse me, they didn’t put themselves down as neo-Nazis, and you had some very bad people in that group. But you also had people that were very fine people on both sides. You had people in that group – excuse me, excuse me, I saw the same pictures you did. You had people in that group that were there to protest the taking down of, to them, a very, very important statue and the renaming of a park from Robert E. Lee to another name.”
After another question at that press conference, Trump became even more explicit:
“I’m not talking about the neo-Nazis and white nationalists because they should be condemned totally.”
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2019/03/21/trump_didnt_call_neo-nazis_fine_people_heres_proof_139815.html
This "white supremist" lie is going to bite roger and the democrats in the ass.
I forgot about the Times story and you are right Roger was peddling the hell out of it
roger's hatred for the man knew no bounds. and today he tries to obscure that fact by blaming mcstain's selection of palin as VP. that's also bullshit.
mcstain could've picked the equivalent of mother teresa and the hypocrite still would've despised both the man and the selection.
Perhaps the reason why McCain overlooked those inconvenient details is because he was a central figure in fueling hysteria about Russian influence in the election after Trump won the presidency
Shocking that Trump would dislike McCain after this and so many other acts against the president by him. Trump is correct.
This "white supremist" lie is going to bite roger and the democrats in the ass.
in a just world it would, but in reality it won't.
telling lies such as this has become modus operandi for democrats. it's a habit. and the reason it developed into a habit is because they've been allowed to get away with telling lies like this for at least as long as i've been alive.
with a complicit media repeating the lies, democrats will never be held to account.
how does a lie like the deep south switching political sides go unchallenged?
how does a guy like trent lott get run out of DC on a fucking rail for giving strom thurmond a casual compliment, while KLANSMAN robert byrd is held up as democrat icon, and praised by hillary clinton?
how does a drunken fucking murderer like ted kennedy even HAVE a future in national politics after what he had done? much less being LIONIZED?
the hypocrisy, double standards, and acceptance of democrat egregious lies has become accepted and mainstream in the US, and democrats know it. and with the media as their praetorian guard, it will never change.
Shocking that Trump would dislike McCain after this and so many other acts against the president by him. Trump is correct.
indeed.
mcstain takes an active and leading role in trying to oust a sitting president via a coup, but trump's the asshole for being angry about it.
uh huh.
pricing moment during a CNN town hall Wednesday evening telling, an audience on live television that he once took his mother to see “Deep Throat.”
God bless both of them......at least his old lady had an open mind, unlike you pauline BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!
Roger believe The Lost Years economy was a blessing.
And the Trump Economy is a cures.
Post a Comment