Awesome admission requirements there sport.....saw it was ranked #2 party school in Mn.....We' re #2!!!!!!! And nothing stupid went on there!!!!! BWAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!
Minnesota State University, Mankato Rankings 61% Application DeadlineDeadline for application submissions. Please contact the school for more details. — SAT Range 886-1106 ACT Range 20-24 Application Fee $20 SAT/ACT Required High School GPA Required Early Decision/Early Action No Application Website mnsu.edu/admissions/applynow.html
There's no way she looks good here. At best she looks weak and whimpy in front of Mexico. At worst she looks traitorous conspiring with left-wing foreign entities who are coordinating the immigrant invasion if the United Sates.
Interesting write up again, seems to me this fake science has nothing to do with climate change....!!!!
Propelled by a two-week siege of widespread severe weather and heavy rain in late May, the contiguous U.S. has once again broken its record for the wettest year-long span in data going back to 1895. According to the monthly U.S. climate summary released Thursday from the NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information, last month was the second-wettest month in U.S. history, with the nationally averaged total of 4.41” just behind the 4.44” recorded in May 2015. All other months in U.S. precipition annals have been no wetter than 4.24”.
The year to date also ranks as the wettest January-to-May period in U.S. history. The nationally averaged total of 15.71” is well above the previous record of 15.13” from Jan.-May 1983. In fact, the difference of 0.58” is almost twice as big as the difference between any other two Jan.-May periods in the 125-year dataset, when arranged from dryest to wettest.
Precipitation averaged across the continguous U.S. for the period Jan.-May for all years going back to 1895 Figure 1. Precipitation averaged across the continguous U.S. for the period Jan.-May for all years going back to 1895, with 2019 standing head and shoulders above all prior years to date. Image credit: NOAA/NCEI. Four states—Illinois, Kansas, Nevada and South Dakota—are having their wettest year on record to date through May, as noted by weather.com's Brian Donegan.
The sodden May pushed the period June 2018-May 2019 into a clear first place for contiguous U.S. precipitation among all year-long time spans going back to 1895. Here is the new Top Ten list:
37.68” June 2018–May 2019 36.20” May 2018–Apr. 2019 35.95” May 2015–Apr. 2016 35.78” Apr. 2015–Mar. 2016 35.73” Mar. 2018–Feb. 2019 35.63” Feb. 1973–Jan. 1974 35.49” Apr. 2018–Mar. 2019 35.47” Jun. 1982–May 1983 35.42” May 1982–Apr. 1983 35.35” Mar. 1973–Feb. 1974
Remarkably, the last twelve months beat the previous record (set just a month ago) by a full 1.48”. None of the other margins on this top-ten list are greater than 0.25”, which speaks to the exceptional nature of just how wet it’s been nationwide. The period includes the wettest winter in U.S. history.
Another piece of evidence: for the last two weeks of May, the U.S. Drought Monitor reported no areas of severe, extreme, or exceptional drought (categories D2-D4) in the contiguous U.S.—the first “0.00” result in the 19-year-plus history of the monitor. In this week’s monitor, released Thursday, small D2 areas were added in far western Washington and parts of southeast Georgia and South Carolina. This amount of D2 coverage (0.51%) is still the lowest observed in monitor history prior to 2019.
Trump victory with Mexico leaves Democrats sputtering -- and looking stupid
President Trump announced a deal with Mexico to help stave the border security crisis, and leaders of both countries celebrated. After all, both countries said they were the winners in the newly signed migration deal. There were losers, of course - Mexico's infamous human smuggling cartels, and far left activists who shake down migrants, both of whom get curbed in the deal. But none made fools of themselves the way the biggest losers here, the Democrats (and their media allies) managed to do. According to the Washington Times: Democrats lashed out in all directions at President Trump after he won concessions from Mexico to try to stop the flow of illegal immigrants at the border. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi chided the president Saturday for his method, saying his threat of tariffs was unbecoming of a friendly country’s treatment of a neighbor.
But Senate Minority Leader Charles E. Schumer took a different approach, saying — seemingly with as much sarcasm as can drip on Twitter — that since Mr. Trump has struck a deal, he can stop talking about illegal immigration.
“Now that that problem is solved, I’m sure we won’t be hearing any more about it in the future,” Mr. Schumer said.
Just days before Mr. Schumer had predicted Mr. Trump would cave and find a reason to revoke his tariff threat.
This is ridiculous. When you've got both sides celebrating, it's a no-brainer to normal people that it's all good. Mexico avoided tariffs and retains a fighting chance of rescuing its economy. Tijuana doesn't get flooded with more caravans full of foreign migrants. Cartel activity becomes less lucrative so there will be less cartel activity. Americans can happily buy Mexican avocados (world's best) without a punitive new tax on them. Big supply chains stay undisturbed and the markets soar with joy. In normal parlance, this is what's known as a 'win-win' deal. President Trump celebrated from Europe via Twitter.
goes on at: https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2019/06/trump_victory_with_mexico_leaves_democrats_sputtering__and_looking_stupid.html#ixzz5qMEjoGlZ
Despite boasting a field of more than two dozen candidates for the 2020 Democratic presidential nominee, the most recent Harvard/Harris poll shows that the 6 out of 10 voters find the slate of choices to defeat President Donald Trump to be "underwhelming."
The poll, conducted online within the United States from May 29-30, 2019 among 1,295 registered voters, found that just 40% of American voters find the Democratic options so far to be "impressive" when asked, "Do you find the current field of Democratic party candidates for president to be impressive or underwhelming?" 60% of participants answered "underwhelming" during this survey.
A couple of caveats:
1. It's an on-line this may not be as much of a reliability as it was in the past but there still a danger of self selection.
2. It's still early in the presidential cycle and voter are as familiar with the candidates.
That said, if these numbers hold up through Election Day then it may very well be a landslide for Trump.
It's hard enough to get voters to change course when things are going good. It voters don't see a clearly superior alternative than it would be next to impossible.
Just having a candidate a little more likable than Trump won't cut it for the Democrats. The candidate will have to be charismatic and have an agenda that overwhelming majority of Americans will buy in to.
The revelation that Kilimnik was a valued State Dept informant, & that Mueller excluded that from his report, is one of the most embarrassing episodes yet for the Russiagate conspiracy theory narrative (and that’s saying a lot). https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/447394-key-figure-that-mueller-report-linked-to-russia-was-a-state-department
Thread based on new FOIA docs that takes you through how the Clinton email server scandal traces directly to the Libya disaster and the Trump-Russia hoax. All of the same players involved
New docs from FBI vault: -FBI concludes Hillary Clinton was in "violation of basic server security" w/ home-brew server. -Discusses possibility that *all* of her emails were stolen. -Review found HRC stripped classification of highest possible level.
President Trump announced a deal with Mexico to help stave the border security crisi
There is no deal yet....the agreement is a preliminary framework for a potential deal!!! Another fucking lie promoted by our fraud in chief....!!!!
Anonymous Jordan Schachtel said... @JordanSchachtel
Thread based on new FOIA docs that takes you through how
Another pile of shit tweet posted by the goat fucking idiot.....Yeah sure the scandal traces to the incompetence of the R party to have a cogent thought about anything!!!!
Trump once again sucking his own mini dick with another lie and alleged victory....
President Donald Trump crowed on Twitter Saturday that a new deal with Mexico that focused on immigration issues includes an agreement by the U.S. neighbor to “immediately” begin buying “large quantities” of U.S. farm products ― a claim that has spurred skepticism.
There’s not a word about such an agricultural deal in the “joint declaration” on the overall agreement issued by the State Department and Mexico. Three Mexican officials with knowledge of the deliberations also told Bloomberg News that they were unaware of any such agreement.
The issue was not raised during negotiations, the officials told Bloomberg.
The New York Times reported Saturday that much of what was outlined in the joint declaration concerning Mexico’s efforts to stem the number of immigrants heading to the U.S. border was already promised by Mexican officials over the past several months and was not sparked by Trump’s threat to impose tariffs on Mexican products.
As for the purchase of farm produce, Mexico has always been a major buyer of U.S. agricultural products. U.S. exports of agricultural products to Mexico last year totaled $20 billion, making the country America’s second-largest largest agricultural export market, according to U.S. statistics. Mexico buys large amounts of American corn, dairy, soybeans and pork and pork products.
Why does the bullshiter in chief feel compelled to lie about EVERYTHING!!!!! And you all will continue to slurp every chance you get!!!!
By Michael D. Shear and Maggie Haberman June 8, 2019
WASHINGTON — The deal to avert tariffs that President Trump announced with great fanfare on Friday night consists largely of actions that Mexico had already promised to take in prior discussions with the United States over the past several months, according to officials from both countries who are familiar with the negotiations.
Friday’s joint declaration says Mexico agreed to the “deployment of its National Guard throughout Mexico, giving priority to its southern border.” But the Mexican government had already pledged to do that in March during secret talks in Miami between Kirstjen Nielsen, then the secretary of homeland security, and Olga Sanchez, the Mexican secretary of the interior, the officials said.
The centerpiece of Mr. Trump’s deal was an expansion of a program to allow asylum-seekers to remain in Mexico while their legal cases proceed. But that arrangement was reached in December in a pair of painstakingly negotiated diplomatic notes that the two countries exchanged. Ms. Nielsen announced the Migrant Protection Protocols during a hearing of the House Judiciary Committee five days before Christmas.
Alabama's Governor signed a bill that bans colleges from restricting students' speech
Democrats in the state came out against the bill, saying that the Republican who sponsored the bill was exposed as a "White supremacist" because he supports free speech
Orwell will soon be banned from college libraries by the left
17 comments:
Awesome admission requirements there sport.....saw it was ranked #2 party school in Mn.....We' re #2!!!!!!! And nothing stupid went on there!!!!! BWAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!
Minnesota State University, Mankato Rankings
61%
Application DeadlineDeadline for application submissions. Please contact the school for more details.
—
SAT Range
886-1106
ACT Range
20-24
Application Fee
$20
SAT/ACT
Required
High School GPA
Required
Early Decision/Early Action
No
Application Website
mnsu.edu/admissions/applynow.html
Sometimes the winning move is not to play:
Pelosi hits Trump’s deal with Mexico, accuses him of ‘threats and temper tantrums’
There's no way she looks good here. At best she looks weak and whimpy in front of Mexico. At worst she looks traitorous conspiring with left-wing foreign entities who are coordinating the immigrant invasion if the United Sates.
SAT Range
886-1106
ACT Range
20-24
Application Fee
$20
SAT/ACT
How does that compare with the elementary grade school you went to Denny?
Interesting write up again, seems to me this fake science has nothing to do with climate change....!!!!
Propelled by a two-week siege of widespread severe weather and heavy rain in late May, the contiguous U.S. has once again broken its record for the wettest year-long span in data going back to 1895. According to the monthly U.S. climate summary released Thursday from the NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information, last month was the second-wettest month in U.S. history, with the nationally averaged total of 4.41” just behind the 4.44” recorded in May 2015. All other months in U.S. precipition annals have been no wetter than 4.24”.
The year to date also ranks as the wettest January-to-May period in U.S. history. The nationally averaged total of 15.71” is well above the previous record of 15.13” from Jan.-May 1983. In fact, the difference of 0.58” is almost twice as big as the difference between any other two Jan.-May periods in the 125-year dataset, when arranged from dryest to wettest.
Precipitation averaged across the continguous U.S. for the period Jan.-May for all years going back to 1895
Figure 1. Precipitation averaged across the continguous U.S. for the period Jan.-May for all years going back to 1895, with 2019 standing head and shoulders above all prior years to date. Image credit: NOAA/NCEI.
Four states—Illinois, Kansas, Nevada and South Dakota—are having their wettest year on record to date through May, as noted by weather.com's Brian Donegan.
The sodden May pushed the period June 2018-May 2019 into a clear first place for contiguous U.S. precipitation among all year-long time spans going back to 1895. Here is the new Top Ten list:
37.68” June 2018–May 2019
36.20” May 2018–Apr. 2019
35.95” May 2015–Apr. 2016
35.78” Apr. 2015–Mar. 2016
35.73” Mar. 2018–Feb. 2019
35.63” Feb. 1973–Jan. 1974
35.49” Apr. 2018–Mar. 2019
35.47” Jun. 1982–May 1983
35.42” May 1982–Apr. 1983
35.35” Mar. 1973–Feb. 1974
Remarkably, the last twelve months beat the previous record (set just a month ago) by a full 1.48”. None of the other margins on this top-ten list are greater than 0.25”, which speaks to the exceptional nature of just how wet it’s been nationwide. The period includes the wettest winter in U.S. history.
Another piece of evidence: for the last two weeks of May, the U.S. Drought Monitor reported no areas of severe, extreme, or exceptional drought (categories D2-D4) in the contiguous U.S.—the first “0.00” result in the 19-year-plus history of the monitor. In this week’s monitor, released Thursday, small D2 areas were added in far western Washington and parts of southeast Georgia and South Carolina. This amount of D2 coverage (0.51%) is still the lowest observed in monitor history prior to 2019.
How does that compare with the elementary grade school you went to Denny?
That is rich coming from a science, women hating high school drop out!!!!!!! BWAAAAAAAA!!!!!
Another big fucking mouth with nothing to back it up.....!!!
Pelosi hits Trump’s deal with Mexico, accuses him of ‘threats and temper tantrums’
Yes he acted like a petulant child....typical behavior of our narcissist in chief that you slurp ;;;;;!!!!!
Trump victory with Mexico leaves Democrats sputtering -- and looking stupid
President Trump announced a deal with Mexico to help stave the border security crisis, and leaders of both countries celebrated. After all, both countries said they were the winners in the newly signed migration deal. There were losers, of course - Mexico's infamous human smuggling cartels, and far left activists who shake down migrants, both of whom get curbed in the deal. But none made fools of themselves the way the biggest losers here, the Democrats (and their media allies) managed to do. According to the Washington Times:
Democrats lashed out in all directions at President Trump after he won concessions from Mexico to try to stop the flow of illegal immigrants at the border.
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi chided the president Saturday for his method, saying his threat of tariffs was unbecoming of a friendly country’s treatment of a neighbor.
But Senate Minority Leader Charles E. Schumer took a different approach, saying — seemingly with as much sarcasm as can drip on Twitter — that since Mr. Trump has struck a deal, he can stop talking about illegal immigration.
“Now that that problem is solved, I’m sure we won’t be hearing any more about it in the future,” Mr. Schumer said.
Just days before Mr. Schumer had predicted Mr. Trump would cave and find a reason to revoke his tariff threat.
This is ridiculous.
When you've got both sides celebrating, it's a no-brainer to normal people that it's all good. Mexico avoided tariffs and retains a fighting chance of rescuing its economy. Tijuana doesn't get flooded with more caravans full of foreign migrants. Cartel activity becomes less lucrative so there will be less cartel activity. Americans can happily buy Mexican avocados (world's best) without a punitive new tax on them. Big supply chains stay undisturbed and the markets soar with joy. In normal parlance, this is what's known as a 'win-win' deal.
President Trump celebrated from Europe via Twitter.
goes on at:
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2019/06/trump_victory_with_mexico_leaves_democrats_sputtering__and_looking_stupid.html#ixzz5qMEjoGlZ
Hmmm Interesting and potentially devastating for Democrats:
Overlooked Poll: 60% Of Voters Find Democratic Field Of Presidential Candidates 'Underwhelming'
Despite boasting a field of more than two dozen candidates for the 2020 Democratic presidential nominee, the most recent Harvard/Harris poll shows that the 6 out of 10 voters find the slate of choices to defeat President Donald Trump to be "underwhelming."
The poll, conducted online within the United States from May 29-30, 2019 among 1,295 registered voters, found that just 40% of American voters find the Democratic options so far to be "impressive" when asked, "Do you find the current field of Democratic party candidates for president to be impressive or underwhelming?" 60% of participants answered "underwhelming" during this survey.
A couple of caveats:
1. It's an on-line this may not be as much of a reliability as it was in the past but there still a danger of self selection.
2. It's still early in the presidential cycle and voter are as familiar with the candidates.
That said, if these numbers hold up through Election Day then it may very well be a landslide for Trump.
It's hard enough to get voters to change course when things are going good. It voters don't see a clearly superior alternative than it would be next to impossible.
Just having a candidate a little more likable than Trump won't cut it for the Democrats. The candidate will have to be charismatic and have an agenda that overwhelming majority of Americans will buy in to.
I just don't see that happening.
1. It's an on-line this may not be as much of a reliability issue as it was in the past but there still a danger of self selection.
2. It's still early in the presidential cycle and voter are not as familiar with the candidates.
I hate I-pads typing app.
@aaronjmate
The revelation that Kilimnik was a valued State Dept informant, & that Mueller excluded that from his report, is one of the most embarrassing episodes yet for the Russiagate conspiracy theory narrative (and that’s saying a lot).
https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/447394-key-figure-that-mueller-report-linked-to-russia-was-a-state-department
Stephen McIntyre Retweeted Aaron Maté
This is an astounding story. Mueller is either crooked or a senile placeholder for crooked Weissman - neither satisfactory.
@JordanSchachtel
Thread based on new FOIA docs that takes you through how the Clinton email server scandal traces directly to the Libya disaster and the Trump-Russia hoax. All of the same players involved
New docs from FBI vault:
-FBI concludes Hillary Clinton was in "violation of basic server security" w/ home-brew server.
-Discusses possibility that *all* of her emails were stolen.
-Review found HRC stripped classification of highest possible level.
https://twitter.com/JordanSchachtel/status/1137090107033493504
President Trump announced a deal with Mexico to help stave the border security crisi
There is no deal yet....the agreement is a preliminary framework for a potential deal!!! Another fucking lie promoted by our fraud in chief....!!!!
Anonymous Jordan Schachtel said...
@JordanSchachtel
Thread based on new FOIA docs that takes you through how
Another pile of shit tweet posted by the goat fucking idiot.....Yeah sure the scandal traces to the incompetence of the R party to have a cogent thought about anything!!!!
@JordanSchachtel
Claim to fame....works for brietbart....BS Poli Sci monmouth university!!! and some advance courses....
Trump once again sucking his own mini dick with another lie and alleged victory....
President Donald Trump crowed on Twitter Saturday that a new deal with Mexico that focused on immigration issues includes an agreement by the U.S. neighbor to “immediately” begin buying “large quantities” of U.S. farm products ― a claim that has spurred skepticism.
There’s not a word about such an agricultural deal in the “joint declaration” on the overall agreement issued by the State Department and Mexico. Three Mexican officials with knowledge of the deliberations also told Bloomberg News that they were unaware of any such agreement.
The issue was not raised during negotiations, the officials told Bloomberg.
The New York Times reported Saturday that much of what was outlined in the joint declaration concerning Mexico’s efforts to stem the number of immigrants heading to the U.S. border was already promised by Mexican officials over the past several months and was not sparked by Trump’s threat to impose tariffs on Mexican products.
As for the purchase of farm produce, Mexico has always been a major buyer of U.S. agricultural products. U.S. exports of agricultural products to Mexico last year totaled $20 billion, making the country America’s second-largest largest agricultural export market, according to U.S. statistics. Mexico buys large amounts of American corn, dairy, soybeans and pork and pork products.
Why does the bullshiter in chief feel compelled to lie about EVERYTHING!!!!! And you all will continue to slurp every chance you get!!!!
By Michael D. Shear and Maggie Haberman
June 8, 2019
WASHINGTON — The deal to avert tariffs that President Trump announced with great fanfare on Friday night consists largely of actions that Mexico had already promised to take in prior discussions with the United States over the past several months, according to officials from both countries who are familiar with the negotiations.
Friday’s joint declaration says Mexico agreed to the “deployment of its National Guard throughout Mexico, giving priority to its southern border.” But the Mexican government had already pledged to do that in March during secret talks in Miami between Kirstjen Nielsen, then the secretary of homeland security, and Olga Sanchez, the Mexican secretary of the interior, the officials said.
The centerpiece of Mr. Trump’s deal was an expansion of a program to allow asylum-seekers to remain in Mexico while their legal cases proceed. But that arrangement was reached in December in a pair of painstakingly negotiated diplomatic notes that the two countries exchanged. Ms. Nielsen announced the Migrant Protection Protocols during a hearing of the House Judiciary Committee five days before Christmas.
@RealSaavedra
Alabama's Governor signed a bill that bans colleges from restricting students' speech
Democrats in the state came out against the bill, saying that the Republican who sponsored the bill was exposed as a "White supremacist" because he supports free speech
Orwell will soon be banned from college libraries by the left
Completely of topic.
On June 9th in 1972 Rapid City South Dakota suffered under a 500 year flood.
I knew some people who were lost.
I posted this on Facebook and I have 478 views. It's one day that you will always remember.
June 9th of 1972, 238 lives were lost. Let's not forget them.
Amen.
Post a Comment