Tuesday, October 8, 2019

So where is the lie?

There has been a groundswell of liberals now arguing that Joe Biden is being railroaded by false charges and conspiracy theories surrounding his and his son Hunter's behavior as it relates to Ukraine, Burisma Holdings, President Poroshenko, and Prosecutor Shokin. Many are suggesting that anyone questioning Biden is either engaging in gas-lighting or out right lying.

These are facts that are not in dispute.

  • Hunter Biden was given a $600K a year job working for a Ukrainian energy company (Burisma Holdings) while his father was the Vice President overseeing the diplomacy with Ukraine. The Vice President was described as the point person to Ukraine. 
  • Hunter Biden had no discernible skills or knowledge of Ukrainian energy, but was provided a lofty salary in spite no known legitimate reason for Burisma to have done so.
  • Hunter Biden did travel with his father to China on Air Force II, where Joe was meeting with the Chinese Government.
  • Hunter did leave with a $1.5 billion dollar investment for Burisma Holdings from a subsidiary company of the Chinese Government. There is no explanation offered as to how Hunter secured this investment.
  • Joe did claim on video that he had the General Prosecutor Viktor Shokin fired after threatening the Ukrainian President that he would withhold a billion dollars in Congressionally approved aid if he wasn't fired. 
  • In a sworn notarized affidavit dated 4 September 2019 for a European court, Shokin did testified that "On several occasions President Poroshenko asked me to have a look at the criminal case against Burisma and consider the possibility of winding down the investigative actions in respect of this company, but I refused to close this investigation." 

These are the facts that are not in dispute (or at least shouldn't be). What is in dispute is whether or not Viktor Shokin was telling the truth last month when he offered under oath that he believes that he was fired because of his involvement in investigating Burisma Holdings. 

Other sources within Ukraine suggest that that investigation was either "dormant" or that it only involved events that took place "prior" to Hunter joining the board. Either way, the fact that there are two sides to just a small part of the overall story does not allow you to demand that the entire narrative is a lie. In fact, it probably demands a closer look.

But  let's forget about the part of this story that is in dispute, and focus on what isn't. 

Nobody (as far as I have seen) has provided an alternate theory as to why Hunter Biden was hired and provided a $600k a year salary that does not involve the idea that he was playing off his father's position of power, and could use it to garner favor. Hunter getting the job because of his father would be problematic and certainly at the very least borderline illegal. 

Nobody (as far as I have seen) has provided an alternation theory as to how Hunter Biden secured a $1.5 billion investment from a Chinese government subsidized business that does not involve his dad pushing some buttons and calling in some favors. If there was even a hint of Hunter receiving this investment because of his father, that would also be problematic and flat out illegal.

To be clear, if any of that $1.5 billion was because of Joe, then the job, the $600k a year salary, and the investment would qualify as dead to right criminal. No questions asked. 

These two issues "alone" are worthy of a serious investigation. It is considered more than just a little illegal for a Politician (especially a Vice President) to use their political ties to secure salaries, gifts, money, or jobs to their family or loved ones. Even if Biden did not have the Prosecutor fired because of an investigation into Burisma Holdings, he still would have to explain the $600k a year salary and the $1.5 billion dollar investment. As far as I know, nobody who has asked these questions has gotten anything other than an earful of rage and anger from Joe along with a lecture about how they need to be focused on Trump's supposed wrong doings instead.

So yeah, there is no lying here folks. There is a small dispute in a pretty large and damning story. The undisputed facts and the undisputed truth are enough for everyone to take pause and want to know how some of this actually happened, and in the process maybe we could also get to the truth about the pressure to fire Shokin. I mean why not?

So why are so many so adamant that everyone comes to Biden's collective defense?

Why do so many on the left insist we be so vigilantly disinterested in the whole situation?

Because they have seen the poll numbers, and know that Biden is not only the "best" chance to defeat Trump, but he may be the "only" chance. But even that only holds true if they can make this whole Hunter/Ukraine/China story go away.

36 comments:

Honest, decent, truthful Rev. said...

CH SAYS:
But even that only holds true if they can make this whole Hunter/Ukraine/China story go away.

JAMES SAYS:
It's not even there,
so it doesn't need to go away.

The only one that IS there is the whole
Trump/Ukraine/Russia/China story.

Honest, decent, truthful Rev. said...

NOR IS THIS WHOLE GIULIANI/UKRAINE THING GOING AWAY--

Trump Told Officials to Deal with Giuliani on Ukraine
October 8, 2019 at 8:08 pm EDT

“President Trump directed Secretary of Energy Rick Perry and two top State Department officials to deal with his private attorney Rudy Giuliani when the Ukrainian President sought to meet Trump, IN A CLEAR CIRCUMVENTION OF OFFICIAL CHANNELS,” CNN reports.

“Trump’s push to have Giuliani as gatekeeper is MORE DIRECT THAN WAS PREVIOUSLY DISCLOSED by one of the meeting’s participants IN HIS STATEMENT TO THE HOUSE LAST WEEK.”

Honest, decent, truthful Rev. said...

Trump Enlists Trey Gowdy for Impeachment Defense
October 8, 2019 at 7:30 pm EDT

“Donald Trump has enlisted former Rep. Trey Gowdy to work with the White House team combating the U.S. House’s impeachment inquiry into the president,” Bloomberg reports.

“Gowdy, a former prosecutor from South Carolina, is not formally joining the White House staff.”

Although earlier reports suggested Gowdy turned down the offer, CNN reports he agreed to do it after meeting with acting White House Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney.

MAYBE THEY HAVE SOMETHING ON HIM?

C.H. Truth said...

Oh it's there James...

You can smell the panic!!!!

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2019/10/08/trump_invades_the_democratic_party_141436.html

https://thehill.com/opinion/campaign/464831-bidens-weak-response-to-trump-is-a-lesson-for-democratic-candidates

https://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/politics/opinions-joe-biden-is-a-hypocrite-on-ukraine/ar-AAItYNv

https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/436816-joe-bidens-2020-ukrainian-nightmare-a-closed-probe-is-revived

https://theintercept.com/2019/05/10/rumors-joe-biden-scandal-ukraine-absolute-nonsense-reformer-says/

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinion/why-biden-wont-survive-the-trump-impeachment/ar-AAIa3qz

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/30/opinion/trump-ukraine-republican.html


There is blood in the water, Warren has already passed him up, and Trump's dick is getting hard over the concept of facing Pocahontas!

Honest, decent, truthful Rev. said...

SOMETHING ELSE THAT ALSO MAY NOT BE GOING AWAY--

Democrats Raise Fresh ‘Quid Pro Quo’ Questions
October 8, 2019 at 7:27 pm EDT

Democrats pursuing an impeachment inquiry of President Trump want to take a fresh look at whether the sale of anti-tank missiles to Kiev last year was in any way connected to Ukraine’s decision to halt investigations into Trump’s campaign chairman, Paul Manafort,” Politico reports.

“It raises the prospect that the president, or his aides, may have been pressuring the Ukrainian government in exchange for political favors FAR EARLIER than previously known.”

C.H. Truth said...

James...

Hate to tell you this... but every time Democrats bring up the term "investigation" they loser voters! It's going to be the "Trump card" to be played throughout the campaign.

While Trump has added 6 million jobs, brought record unemployment to Blacks and Hispanics, and brought crime down...

The idiots on the left just can't stop "investigating" their tin foil hat conspiracies!


And now they have the "secret identity witness" with really swell second hand information that nobody will know.... and "this is the one" that will bring him down.

A phone call!

LOL!!!

Someday, James... you will look back and this to do a big face palm and go "what the hell was I thinking"!

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

This is just stonewalling.

The actions of the President are the reason for the impeachment investigation and I hope a vote for impeachment hearings.

Distraction is a political tactic.

You have your head so far up his ass you need CPR full time.

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

You actually are buying into the bullshit that this entire investigation is to reverse the last election.

Scott A**hole, you have lost your mind.

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

They said that impeachment is invalid!!

Have you read the Constitution??

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

The letter from the White House.

Obviously he has committed high crime and misdemeanor with this very letter.

Dear Madam Speaker and Messrs. Chairmen:

I write on behalf of President Donald J. Trump in response to your numerous, legally unsupported demands made as part of what you have labeled — contrary to the Constitution of the United States and all past bipartisan precedent — as an “impeachment inquiry.” As you know, you have designed and implemented your inquiry in a manner that violates fundamental fairness and constitutionally mandated due process.

For example, you have denied the President the right to cross-examine witnesses, to call witnesses, to receive transcripts of testimony, to have access to evidence, to have counsel present, and many other basic rights guaranteed to all Americans. You have conducted your proceedings in secret. You have violated civil liberties and the separation of powers by threatening Executive Branch officials, claiming that you will seek to punish those who exercise fundamental constitutional rights and prerogatives. All of this violates the Constitution, the rule of law, and every past precedent. Never before in our history has the House of Representatives — under the control of either political party — taken the American people down the dangerous path you seem determined to pursue.

Put simply, you seek to overturn the results of the 2016 election and deprive the American people of the President they have freely chosen. Many Democrats now apparently view impeachment not only as a means to undo the democratic results of the last election, but as a strategy to influence the next election, which is barely more than a year away. As one member of Congress explained, he is "concerned that if we don't impeach the President, he will get reelected.” Your highly partisan and unconstitutional effort threatens grave and lasting damage to our democratic institutions, to our system of free elections, and to the American people.

========
The impeachment is not an attempt to overturn the last election. It is an investigation into the probable cause of high crimes and misdemeanors.

Read the White House Letter in Response to the Impeachment Inquiry

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

A strong economy is not a valid argument against impeachment hearings.

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

Speaker Pelosi

“For a while, the President has tried to normalize lawlessness. Now, he is trying to make lawlessness a virtue. The American people have already heard the President’s own words – ‘do us a favor, though.’ The President’s actions threaten our national security, violate our Constitution and undermine the integrity of our elections. The White House letter is only the latest attempt to cover up his betrayal of our democracy, and to insist that the President is above the law.

“This letter is manifestly wrong, and is simply another unlawful attempt to hide the facts of the Trump Administration’s brazen efforts to pressure foreign powers to intervene in the 2020 elections. Despite the White House’s stonewalling, we see a growing body of evidence that shows that President Trump abused his office and violated his oath to ‘protect, preserve and defend the Constitution.’

“The White House should be warned that continued efforts to hide the truth of the President’s abuse of power from the American people will be regarded as further evidence of obstruction.

“Mr. President, you are not above the law. You will be held accountable.”


You have said that a strong economy is proof that the investigation is invalid.

History 101.

Checks and balances! Three coequal branches of government.

One of them is to monitor the President. It's grated by the Constitution, that you despise.

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

You actually believe that there are tin foil hat conspiracies!


The institutions are not the tools of the President.

Myballs said...

So for the first-time in the history of the United States, we have a house speaker trying to impeach a duly elected president without taking any vote to author it.

Trump is right. This is not an impeachment proceeding. It's a partisan lynching. He should slap a lawsuit on Pelosi, Schiff anf Nadler.

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

A White House official who listened to the entire President Trump’s July phone call with Ukraine’s leader described it as “crazy,” “frightening” and “completely lacking in substance related to national security,”

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

The Constitution gives the Congress the authority to prosecute the President. Political beliefs are irrelevant in a legal manner.

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

Trump is trying to force Speaker Pelosi to hold a vote on impeachment hearings, not investigations. The President is making a mistake, because she has the required number of votes.

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

In every instance there were some political purposes, the Clinton impeachment process was purely partisan. The Senate refused to convict the president.

Nixon resigned before he would have been convicted and removed from office.

Anonymous said...

She has been fund raising.

"During an interview aired on Tuesday’s broadcast of “PBS NewsHour,” former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton remarked that maybe there should be a “rematch” between her and President Trump, and “obviously, I can beat him again.”

Get bitter loser Algore and make another run at it.

Anonymous said...

Punk Alky the skirt wearing sissy said
"Trump is trying to force Speaker Pelosi to hold a vote on impeachment hearings, not investigations. The President is making a mistake, because she has the required number of votes."

Hold the vote, stop hiding.

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

The President and his supporters are attempting to declare that the impeachment investigation is not a Constitutional right of the congressional branch of government.

The Constitution has three equal branches of government. Therefore this is the reason he should be impeached and convicted by the Senate. If they do not fulfill their Constitutional role, our Constitution is no longer our government system. The greatest nation in history will dissolved.

😟😟😟

Anonymous said...

Hillary's released the Hunter Biden Pay for Play Story and it worked.
"Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) has surpassed Joe Biden (D) in the current Real Clear Politics average, marking the first time Biden has lost his lead since announcing his presidential bid.

The current Real Clear Politics average showsWarren narrowly edging out Biden with 26.6 percent support to Biden’s 26.4 percent support. The change follows weeks of Warren slowly gaining on Biden in both national and early primary state polls. Both candidates hold a double-digit lead over Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT), who is currently averaging 14.6 percent."


Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

18% Republicans polled supported impeachment and removal from office.

His refusal to cooperate on anything is going to hurt him more!

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

Yawn

cowardly king obama said...


C.H. Truth said...There is blood in the water, Warren has already passed him up, and Trump's dick is getting hard over the concept of facing Pocahontas!

I've heard with all her family fibs Trump is going with Fauxcahontas

PlayTheTrumpCard said...

@PlaysTrumpCard

I'm a bit unclear on how having a CIA asset in the WH, who's working for a possible election opponent of the President, sneaking around with @RepAdamSchiff and concocting a lie about a phone call to start an "impeachment inquiry", isn't election interference of the worst kind

C.H. Truth said...

There is no impeachment going on.

There is a fake inquiry made up as they go along.


When Clinton was impeached, the Judiciary committee voted to start the proceedings and they followed the impeachment guidelines which include both sides calling witnesses and all witnesses being cross examined.

There has been no vote. They are not following procedures. They are not allowing anyone to call witnesses (only Schiff is calling them) and they are not allowing any Republicans to question anyone.

Oh, and they are not releasing any of the transcripts. They are only releasing the portions that they want to release.


Only a moron who cannot keep a woman, begs for money, and lives out of a hotel would think that this was how the founding fathers set up impeachment hearings.

White House Counsel, the DOJ, and the OLC will all tell you that just like there was no actual "whistle blower" there is no actual "impeachment" going on right now.

The Democrats and the media are just calling it that, because they know people are to stupid to know better.

cowardly king obama said...

Hold the vote, stop hiding.

HEAR, HEAR

C.H. Truth said...

Basically...

According to our dopes here.

No President is entitled to ANY due process if the opposition Party decides to "repeal" him or her. We'll call it "repeal" because it's not impeachment.

Doesn't matter.

They no longer need to hold the vote that they are required to hold.
They no longer allow anyone but themselves to call any witnesses.
Only they get to question them. No cross examination.
They do not allow the President to have any counsel present.
They do not allow the President's counsel to question anyone
They do not allow the President's counsel to call any witnesses.

They do not even allow the President to see the testimony against him.


This is what 3rd world shit hole countries do.
This is not what a Country like the United States does.

But liberals are willing to ruin the entire concept of rule of law and due process because of how much they hate the "bad orange man".

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

Russia is happy


U.S. and Kurdish officials expect Turkey to launch a military operation within 24 hours as Trump tries to backpedal.
BY LARA SELIGMAN | OCTOBER 8, 2019, 4:04 PM
A Turkish army's tank drives down from a truck as Turkish armed forces drive towards the border with Syria near Akcakale in Sanliurfa province on October 8, 2019. (Photo by BULENT KILIC/AFP via Getty Images)
A Turkish army's tank drives down from a truck as Turkish armed forces drive towards the border with Syria near Akcakale in Sanliurfa province on October 8, 2019. (Photo by BULENT KILIC/AFP via Getty Images)
U.S. and Kurdish officials said late Tuesday that they expect Turkey to launch a major offensive into northeast Syria within the next 24 hours, after U.S. President Donald Trump appeared to give Ankara the green light to begin the operation.

The preparations come as the administration sought to backpedal on Trump’s surprise Sunday announcement, following a telephone call with Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, that he was ordering the withdrawal U.S. troops from the border with Turkey, paving the way for Ankara to move forward with a potentially devastating attack on America’s Kurdish allies.

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

You haven't read the Constitution.

Hearings are not a scam.

The President is not above the law.

3rd world shit hole countries let the President do anything he wants.

He said that in public.

Impeachment is not a criminal procedure. It's an investigation into the actions of the President, and they have the right to determine if he has committed high crimes and misdemeanors.

You want to suspended the entire concept of rule of law in order to protect the President from impeachment hearings.

This is not driven by hatred for the President. This is to preserve the rule of law, from an assault on the Constitution.

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

Scott A**hole believes in the “great and unmatched wisdom” of Donald J. Trump, where his “great and unmatched wisdom” in regards to his decision causing a devastating attack on America’s Kurdish allies, who fought against ISIS and have about 2,000 captured ISIS soldiers in captivity.

And his pathological beliefs in the deep state conspiracy theories, were motivated to destroy the evil Orange bad man, is evidence of a mental disorder and cognitive dissonance.

Even #MoscowMitch has criticized the orange monster!

Anonymous said...



You want to suspended the entire concept of rule of law in order to protect the President from impeachment hearings.

This is not driven by hatred for the President.



so much psychological projection, so little time.

the rule of law is in fine fettle alky. it's due process that's been suspended.

impeachment requires a full house vote. so far we have a subset of a subset of a group of asshats who are avoiding that core concept altogether.

so if the democrats are going to avoid working within the rules, it should come as no surprise that the accused refuses to cooperate.

and yes, this is driven by hatred of the president. the investigation into this man began on the day he declared his candidacy, and the effort to remove him from office began on his inauguration day.

and all you can do in response is spam the board with dozens of copy/pastes that are not relevant to the central issue:

you refuse to accept the results of an election. a refusal that the feckless cunt felonia von pantsuit said is "a direct threat to our democracy."


isn't it interesting that every fucking single thing you accuse trump of doing, a democrat has actually DONE.




Anonymous said...




OOPS:


John Solomon:

I can confirm to you tonight. The US government had open source intelligence and was aware that as early as February in 2019 that the Ukrainian government was planning on reopening the Burisma investigation.

This was long before the president ever imagined to have a call with President Zelensky. In fact it’s before President Zelensky was even elected.

This is a significant shift in the factual timeline. This is information that was omitted from the whistleblower’s complaint.



https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/10/sorry-democrats-its-over-john-solomon-drops-bomb-info-omitted-from-whistleblower-report-ukraine-was-re-opening-probe-into-hunter-bidens-company-in-february/


Anonymous said...




“People are innocent until alleged to be involved in some type of criminal activity.”

- John Brennan on MSDNC


what were you saying about "You want to suspended the entire concept of rule of law in order to protect the President from impeachment hearings." alky???


Anonymous said...

You can certainly enter the name donald dumbass trump and the statements would all be true!!!!! BWAAAAAAAAA!!!! Keep digging lil scotty!!!

Hunter Biden was given a $600K a year job working for a Ukrainian energy company (Burisma Holdings) while his father was the Vice President overseeing the diplomacy with Ukraine. The Vice President was described as the point person to Ukraine.
Hunter Biden had no discernible skills or knowledge of Ukrainian energy, but was provided a lofty salary in spite no known legitimate reason for Burisma to have done so.