Now the unhinged left is demanding Jeff Sessions' head on a stick because Sessions twice had contact with Russian Diplomats. Once was in a meet and greet with twenty seven foreign diplomats (one happening to be Russian), and another was a meeting with a Russian Ambassador. Of course there are three rather large problems with this particular scandal:
- Jeff Sessions was not part of the Donald Trump campaign. Not listed as part of his campaign management. Not listed as an domestic adviser. Not listed as a foreign policy adviser. Not listed as part of campaign communications. Not listed what-so-ever as being associated with the campaign.
- Jeff Sessions was a Senator at the time and taking both informal and formal meetings with foreign diplomats was part of the job.
- There isn't the slightest shred of evidence that the meetings in question had anything to do with Donald Trump's campaign.
Herein lies the current state of reality that the unhinged left is living in. Apparently if there is any sort of meeting between anyone loosely associated with Donald Trump and anyone who happens to be from Russia... it must have been about the hacking of DNC and Clinton campaign web servers. This is a little like that person who finds out you are from the state of Minnesota and figures you must know the Petersen family from Edina.
60 comments:
If Eric Holder or Loretta Lynch met with a Russian ambassador this would be a non-story.
Look what they did with Lynch's ex-parte and totally inappropriate meeting with Bill Clinton.
A big yawn from the media.
The real story is Obama actively sabotaging trump. And the media ignore it choosing instead to write about kellyann having her shoes on the sofa.
Like the sun.setting in the west.
Blogger Roger Amick said...
Like the sun.setting in the west.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
your histrionic asshattery?
indeed, alky.
sessions met with the russian ambassador in his official capacity as a sitting senator on the armed services committee. sessions was not part of the trump campaign.
so what you and the national laughingstock (formerly known as the washington post) have been spreading is flimsy innuendo, based on partisan conjecture and a desperate wish for it to be true.
christ alky, you're even giving hacks a bad name these days.
Obama made sure that the new President could not destroy the reports from various sources, documents that the incoming President could destroy the reports made by various sources on the Russian involvement in the Presidential election.
There is nothing wrong with that, in fact it is patriotic. The integrity of our democracy and the peaceful lawful transfer of power is vital to our democratic republic.
The story is full of portentous implications. This is what it’s all about: “The previously undisclosed discussions could fuel new congressional calls for the appointment of a special counsel to investigate Russia’s alleged role in the 2016 presidential election. As attorney general, Sessions oversees the Justice Department and the FBI, which have been leading investigations into Russian meddling and any links to Trump’s associates. He has so far resisted calls to recuse himself.”
The Post’s story has triggered a Pavlovian response from Nancy Pelosi. Pelosi has called on Sessions to resign.
The Post devotes seven reporters to the story. Despite the manpower devoted to the story, the text reports nothing on the substance of the conversations and lacks any detail at all on the alleged July meeting. In one of several videos connected to the story, however, lead reporter Adam Entous states: “What we learned is that there was an informal discussion that basically Sessions had in July with the Russian ambassador to the United States on the sidelines of the Republican National Convention and that there was a second encounter, that one a much more formal one, that took place in Sessions’s Senate office that took place in September…”
Quotable quote: “The Russian ambassador did not respond to requests for comment about his contacts with Sessions.”
http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2017/03/the-sessions-connection.php
LOL.
so there's no "there" there.
typical of democrat hyperbolic "scandals." and no, contrary to the wisdom of our resident AA asshat, 0linsky's goal was not inspired by a sense of patriotism. and not because 0linsky doesn't have a patriotic bone in his body. his goal was to ambush the incoming administration. his time would've been better spent having his minions remove the "T" key from all the white house computer keyboards.
The "failing" New York Times.
In the Obama administration’s last days, some White House officials scrambled to spread information about Russian efforts to undermine the presidential election — and about possible contacts between associates of President-elect Donald J. Trump and Russians — across the government. Former American officials say they had two aims: to ensure that such meddling isn’t duplicated in future American or European elections, and to leave a clear trail of intelligence for government investigators.
American allies, including the British and the Dutch, had provided information describing meetings in European cities between Russian officials — and others close to Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin — and associates of President-elect Trump, according to three former American officials who requested anonymity in discussing classified intelligence.
Separately, American intelligence agencies had intercepted communications of Russian officials, some of them within the Kremlin, discussing contacts with Trump associates.
The disclosures about the contacts came as new questions were raised about Attorney General Jeff Sessions’s ties to the Russians. According to a former senior American official, he met with the Russian ambassador, Sergey I. Kislyak, twice in the past year. The details of the meetings were not clear, but the contact appeared to contradict testimony Mr. Sessions provided Congress during his confirmation hearing in January when he said he “did not have communications with the Russians.”
The top Democrat on Nunes’ committee, Adam Schiff of California, said it’s too early to rule out that contacts occurred between Trump’s campaign and Russian officials.
"First of all, we haven’t received any of the evidence yet," said Schiff. "We can’t draw any conclusion, nor should we." Schiff said he "strongly" disagreed with Nunes’ comment about McCarthyism. At this stage, the committee shouldn’t exclude anyone as potential witnesses, including White House officials, the lawmaker said.
https://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2017-02-27/durbin-wants-independent-russia-probes-as-trump-rejects-them
no evidence yet?
huh.
one would suspect that if there actually WAS any evidence one of 0linsky's leakers would've leaked it by now.
The longer the Democrats hang onto the "Russian Hacking Conspiracy" the better off it is for the Trump Presidency and the GOP's chances in 2018.
Congressman Dan Kildee: Attorney General Sessions Must Resign
March 2, 2017
Congressman Dan Kildee (MI-05) released the following statement after it was reported that Attorney General Jeff Sessions lied under oath to the Senate Judiciary Committee during his confirmation hearings about meetings with Russian officials:
“The Attorney General lied under oath to Congress about his own communications with the Russians. Corruption and lying by public officials cannot be tolerated whatsoever. The Attorney General must resign.”
“Congress must call a bipartisan, independent and outside commission to investigate President Trump’s political and financial connections to Russia. The American people deserve the truth.”
During his confirmation hearings, under penalty of perjury, Mr. Sessions told the Senate Judiciary Committee, “I have been called a surrogate at a time or two in that campaign and I did not have communications with the Russians.”
but the contact appeared to contradict testimony Mr. Sessions provided Congress during his confirmation hearing in January when he said he “did not have communications with the Russians.”
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
uh, no it didn't.
Attorney General Jeff Sessions met with the Russian ambassador to the U.S. before the presidential election last year, his spokeswoman confirmed, raising questions about whether he misled senators who inquired about the Trump campaign's ties to Moscow.
Sarah Isgur Flores told NBC News that Sessions did have a conversation with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak last year. The meeting was first reported by The Washington Post.
But she said "there was absolutely nothing misleading about his answer" because Sessions was asked during the hearing about "communications between Russia and the Trump campaign" and not about meetings he took as a member of the Armed Services Committee.
According to his spokeswoman, Sessions' meeting with Kislyak was just one of 25 conversations with foreign ambassadors in his role on the committee.
Democrats alleged that Sessions misled the Senate Judiciary Committee on Jan. 10.
http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/sessions-met-russian-ambassador-didn-t-mislead-senate-spokeswoman-n727966
i love the smell of democrat desperate flailing in the morning...
it smells like a trump VICTORY.
LOL.
Valerie Jerrett has now actually moved in with the Obamas. Clearly they're actively working to undermine trump. This classless, underhanded action is a sad precedent.
C.H. Truth said...
The longer the Democrats hang onto the "Russian Hacking Conspiracy" the better off it is for the Trump Presidency and the GOP's chances in 2018.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
absolutely.
notice that the most vocal dems are from safe seats.
when heidi heitkamp, joe manchin or claire mccaskill start demanding a resignation i'll take notice.
until then, it's pure partisan butt hurt on display.
a special thanks to our resident inebriated parrot providing crucial copy/pastes from the ny times and national laughingstock.
It's just the opposite. You may lose both houses of the congress.
It's not a positive in any way for your side. I was absolutely correct in my prediction that you would defend Sessions.
When questioned by All Franken, he did not answer the question. Instead, he made a comment about another issue.
Apply your self proclaimed analytical abilities to watch the clip on YouTube, and return to explain how Sessions was not being deceptive in response to the question.
It's just the opposite. You may lose both houses of the congress.
Because a Senator sitting on the Armed Services Committee met with foreign ambassadors (including the one from Russia) as part of his job?
I thought the reason that the GOP was going to lose both houses and that Trump would be impeached was due to the incoming National Security Adviser General Flynn having phone conversations with foreign leaders that included Russian Diplomats?
Or where those telephone conversations "not" the biggest story since Watergate as you claimed just a scant couple of weeks ago?
I guess I am still looking for the appropriate law that forbids U.S. Government officials from meeting with or speaking to anyone from Russia?
Ahem...
When questioned by All Franken, he did not answer the question. Instead, he made a comment about another issue.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
that's flatly false.
Here, via C-SPAN, is the transcript:
Franken: CNN just published a story alleging that the intelligence community provided documents to the president-elect last week, that included information that “Russian operatives claim to have compromising personal and financial information about Mr. Trump.” These documents also allegedly say “there was a continuing exchange of information during the campaign between Trump surrogates and intermediaries for the Russian government.” Again, I’m telling you this as it’s coming out, so you know. But if it’s true, it’s obviously extremely serious, and if there is any evidence that anyone affiliated with the Trump campaign communicated with the Russian government in the course of this campaign, what will you do?
Sessions: Senator Franken, I’m not aware of any of those activities. I have been called a surrogate at a time or two in that campaign and I did not have communications with the Russians, and I’m unable to comment on it.
Franken: Very well.
sessions was not a surrogate or part of the campaign at the time. his meetings with the russian ambassador were in the context of his position as a senator on the armed services committee. and the day before THAT meeting, he met with an emissary from ukraine. the national laughingstock left out THAT meeting.
keep flailing rog. it's fun to watch.
In light of a report that Attorney General Jeff Sessions spoke with the Russian ambassador during the 2016 presidential campaign — seemingly contradicting his testimony before the Senate — Republicans are now calling for the Trump appointee to recuse himself from investigating Russia.
Even Rep. Jason Chaffetz, the chairman of the House Oversight Committee, who has been reluctant to speak out against President Donald Trump, said Thursday morning that Sessions should recuse himself because of how he answered questions in his confirmation hearing. House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy, who has cozied himself with the new Trump administration, also suggested that Sessions should pull himself from any Russian probe.
Many Democratic leaders believe that a recusal is not enough. Rep. Eric Swalwell, who sits on the House Intelligence Committee, said Thursday that Sessions “should probably resign.” Sen. Al Franken, who asked the question in Sessions’ confirmation hearing that elicited a false statement, said that “at the very minimum” the attorney general “should recuse himself.”
Apply your self proclaimed analytical abilities...
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
anyone with the analytical abilities of a potted plant can discern that you assholes are on a fishing expedition. the problem is, you've cast your line into a toilet.
Non story???? 😍😂😂
Republican leaders this morning are calling for Attorney General Jeff Sessions to recuse himself from Justice Department investigations over the alleged links between the Trump campaign and the Russian government after new revelations that Sessions did not disclose his meetings with a Russian ambassador during the election.
House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy said this morning that Sessions "needs to clarify what these meetings were and when did he have them."
"I think the trust of the American people you recuse yourself in these situations," McCarthy said on MSNBC. “I don’t have all the information in front of me, I don’t want to prejudge, but I just think for any investigation going forward, you want to make sure everybody trusts the investigation."
McCarthy added that it would "be easier from that standpoint” for Sessions to recuse himself.
Sessions twice met with Russian ambassador in 2016 despite denial
Democrats call for Sessions' resignation amid reports of contact with Russians
House Oversight Committee chair Jason Chaffetz echoed McCarthy this morning on Twitter.
Sessions met twice with Sergey Kislyak, Russia's ambassador to the U.S., during the 2016 presidential election season, the Department of Justice confirmed Wednesday.
"I never met with any Russian officials to discuss issues of the campaign," Sessions said in a statement Wednesday night. "I have no idea what this allegation is about. It is false."
Sessions told NBC News this morning that "whenever it's appropriate I will recuse myself."
During his confirmation hearing in January, Sessions was asked by Sen. Al Franken, D-Minn., what he would do if there was evidence that the Trump campaign communicated with the Russian government.
"I'm not aware of any of those activities. I have been called a surrogate at a time or two in that campaign and I did not have communications with the Russians and I'm unable to comment on it," Sessions replied.
Sessions, however, held a meeting in his Senate office with Kislyak in September. The meeting was listed on his public schedule.
According to The Washington Post, Sessions also encountered Kislyak at a Heritage Foundation event in July, which a Justice Department official described as a "brief encounter."
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/republicans-chaffetz-mccarthy-sessions-recuse-doj-investigations-trump/story?id=45855401
Salon
LOL
btw alky, i'm with chaffetz and mccarthy. sessions should recuse himself. him doing so will only make you assholes look MORE ridiculous when this whole joke is over.
Sessions: Senator Franken, I’m not aware of any of those activities. I have been called a surrogate at a time or two in that campaign and I did not have communications with the Russians, and I’m unable to comment on it.
Roger
Which is your argument:
So after meeting with Ambassadors from twenty some countries as part of his position on the Arms Service Committee... you are saying he should resign or be fired because one of those Ambassadors was from Russia?
Or...
So after being asked about Trump campaign members meeting with Russian "intermediaries" about the fact that "Russian operatives claim to have compromising personal and financial information about Mr. Trump" - you think he should resign or be fired because he did not disclose that he had a public meeting with the Russian Ambassador as part of his role as a Senator on the Arms Service Committee?
Do you honestly believe that meeting with Russian Ambassadors is illegal, or that the Russian Ambassador would be considered an "intermediary" who was trying to black mail the Trump campaign over compromising personal information that included the now debunked claim that he was involved with golden shower play with Russian hookers?
MAR 2 2017, 10:45 AM ET
Attorney General Jeff Sessions : ‘I Will Recuse Myself’ If Necessary
by TONY CAPRA and ERIK ORTIZ
SHARE
Share
Tweet
Share
Email
Print
Attorney General Jeff Sessions denied meeting with Russian officials during the course of the presidential election to discuss the Trump campaign, he told NBC News in exclusive remarks early Thursday.
Related: Top Republicans Call on Sessions to Recuse Himself from Investigation
"I have not met with any Russians at any time to discuss any political campaign," he said, "and those remarks are unbelievable to me and are false. And I don't have anything else to say about that."
http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/attorney-general-jeff-sessions-i-will-recuse-myself-if-necessary-n728046
Remember when during the election, and Bill Clinton v met with the Attorney General, on her airplane? You were absolutely certain that they discussed their investigation on Hillary Clinton? Why do you believe that he never discussed the election? But you believe Sessions. Gee, of course!
Of course not. The magic(R) is impenetrable armor.
Do you honestly believe that meeting with Russian Ambassadors is illegal, no. But I find it impossible to believe, without proof that they didn't discuss the election. But you do, absolutely!
"or that the Russian Ambassador would be considered an "intermediary" who was trying to black mail the Trump campaign over compromising personal information that included the now debunked claim that he was involved with golden shower play with Russian hookers?"
You pulled that on out of your ass. It is irrelevant to this issue.
He REPEATEDLY said that he had NO discussions on any issue.
You forgive him, why?
Remember when during the election, and Bill Clinton v met with the Attorney General, on her airplane? You were absolutely certain that they discussed their investigation on Hillary Clinton? Why do you believe that he never discussed the election? But you believe Sessions. Gee, of course!
Because it was part of Senator Session's responsibility as a Senate Arms Committee to meet with foreign Ambassadors. If you actually believe he met with the Russian Ambassador to talk about Donald Trump's golden shower prostitute meetings? Then what did he talk to the other 20 some Ambassadors about?
Because everyone understands that the Attorney General should not be meeting in a private location with the Husband of someone who was part of a high profile investigation that was in the process of recommending or not recommending charges.
_____
In other words, Roger. The Sessions meeting was normal every day business that he had with Ambassadors from all around the world.
The Lynch Clinton meeting was neither normal, appropriate, or had any other useful reason for happening. Do you really believe that they would take the chance of being caught... because they desperately wanted to talk about Grandchildren?
He REPEATEDLY said that he had NO discussions on any issue.
So far you can show that he was asked once... and it was in specific reference to "intermediaries" as those intermediaries pertained to possibly blackmail over "damaging information regarding Donald Trump's personal life".
Seriously Roger... get a grip!
It is good to have the media carry your water for you.
This story is ridiculous hysteria.
The Democrats know it's ridiculous hysteria.
And the only way they can keep this story going is the with active participation of the media.
Remember when during the election, and Bill Clinton v met with the Attorney General, on her airplane? You were absolutely certain that they discussed their investigation on Hillary Clinton? Why do you believe that he never discussed the election? But you believe Sessions. Gee, of course!
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
think it through, gin blossom. it's not hard if you try.
sessions had reason to meet with the russian ambassador at a senator on the armed services committee.
bubba, otoh, had no legitimate reason to meet with lynch other than to influence lynch's involvement in the FBI investigation into queen cankles.
there's really no logical or legitimate comparison between the two, which explains exactly why you decided to try and make one.
It is irrelevant to this issue.
It was the topic of the questioning, Roger. Franken didn't ask him a broad question about whether or not a Senator might meet with an Ambassador from Russia.
Franken's line of question was in regards to (his word) "intermediaries" as it pertained to the damaging information that the Russians supposedly had on Donald Trump.
So the context of the question that Franken asked was whether or not Sessions had knowledge or participated in any of these meetings with "intermediaries"...
It's a semantic argument to suggest that when Sessions said he was unaware of anyone from the Trump campaign meeting with Russians (intermediaries) and that he didn't meet with them... that he was lying.
I am guessing most people would understand the difference between a clandestine meeting that involved blackmail demands, and Senators meeting with Ambassadors as part of normal ongoing diplomacy.
He REPEATEDLY said that he had NO discussions on any issue
No, he said he has no discussions about the Trump campaign with the Russians.
That's is what Franklin asked.
And of course Franklin knows what that is what he asked but he's desperate to destroy this administration.
It's only unthinking fools like you who believe what they want to believe.
we're at the stage of the story where roger's invincible ignorance kicks into overdrive.
The invincible ignorance fallacy[1] is a deductive fallacy of circularity where the person in question simply pig-headedly refuses to believe the argument, ignoring any evidence given.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Invincible_ignorance_fallacy
Are you going to post this FIVE more times?
Speaker Ryan. Rescue himself.
No link.
Spam by the drunkard.
Spam by the drunkard.
That's your analysis, (R) excuses
Spam by the drunkard.
No link
the lunacy simply cannot be complete without input from thomas friedman:
THOMAS FRIEDMAN: I think those who have suggested that Jeff Sessions perjured himself in his testimony have a lot of evidence for that.
. . .
ALISYN CAMEROTA: Why, do you think, aren’t more Republicans up in arms about this?
FRIEDMAN: Ali, I think it is one of the most shameful things I’ve seen in almost 30 years being in Washington, DC.
. . .
On 9/11, we lost 3,000 of our brothers and sisters. At Pearl Harbor, we lost thousands of people. These were huge events. I don’t compare it in terms of lives lost. But in terms of import, this was a direct assault on the very thing that makes us unique as a nation: the fact that we rotate power legally, freely, okay, and we don’t challenge that.
And the fact that the Russians attacked this, that for less than the price of a MIG-29, for less than the price of a MIG-29, Vladimir Putin intervened in our election and helped to create, helped to elect a chaos candidate, which is exactly what Putin wants, because he is out to destroy the West. The fact that the Republican party is sitting there on its hands, not responding to this, looking the other way, and looking for excuses for it, is one of the most shameful national security cases I have ever seen in Washington, DC.
http://legalinsurrection.com/2017/03/media-hysteria-tom-friedman-invokes-911-pearl-harbor-over-sessionsrussia//#more
Loretta Russo said...
No link.
Spam by the drunkard.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
he's citing an ancient OP/ED by ruth marcus from the national laughingstock. he was so quick to cite it he neglected to check the date.:
How Paul Ryan could recuse himself from supporting Donald Trump
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/how-paul-ryan-could-recuse-himself-from-supporting-donald-trump/2016/05/10/d218999a-16c4-11e6-9e16-2e5a123aac62_story.html?utm_term=.6ab492c2d5cf
the peaceful lawful transfer of power is vital to our democratic republic." Asshole
Really, better tell your party and the ENEMY WITHIN that Obama left behind and is controlling to start , War was declared against Trump by YOU on Nov 9th,2016.
MORE POP, pop ,pop, POP, pop, pop, pop
can white jackets be far away or did they use those all up with the Democratic members of Congress?
ROF, HOWLING !!!!
EIGHT MORE YEARS !!!
"no legitimate reason to meet" with the Russian hackers as a Senator.
Hypocrisy on steroids.
One of the meetings was a private conversation between Sessions and Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak that took place in September in the senator’s office, at the height of what U.S. intelligence officials say was a Russian cyber campaign to upend the U.S. presidential race.
The previously undisclosed discussions could fuel new congressional calls for the appointment of a special counsel to investigate Russia’s alleged role in the 2016 presidential election. As attorney general, Sessions oversees the Justice Department and the FBI, which have been leading investigations into Russian meddling and any links to Trump’s associates. He has so far resisted calls to recuse himself.
When Sessions spoke with Kislyak in July and September, the senator was a senior member of the influential Armed Services Committee as well as one of Trump’s top foreign policy advisers. Sessions played a prominent role supporting Trump on the stump after formally joining the campaign in February 2016.
Washington Post
the Russian hackers
Exactly what I expected out of you Roger...
You honestly believe that the Russian Ambassador (one of over two dozen Ambassadors Sessions met with in 2016) was a "hacker". For Christ Sake.
You probably also believe that everyone from the Middle East is a terrorist, everyone from Mexico is part of Cartel, every Jewish person is money grubbing miser.
Or is your bigotry limited to believing everyone from Russia is a hacker?
"Seriously Roger... get a grip!"
Always the optimistic, CH.
Roger Amick said...
"no legitimate reason to meet" with the Russian hackers as a Senator.
Hypocrisy on steroids.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
ok genius, i'll play along.
where is the evidence that russian ambassador kislyak was actually one of these mythical russian "hackers"?
point me to the direct ties between kislyak and hillary's defeat.
let's go sport. this should be easy for you.
"can white jackets be far away or did they use those all up with the Democratic members of Congress?
ROF, HOWLING !!!!
EIGHT MORE YEARS !!!"
LOL
Rep. Dan Kildee (D-MI) ,Alky why coverup that fact that he is a Dem.
82 Dems have now called for Sessions to Resign.
I am loving this, the Enemy within fully Exposed.
President Trump has every right now to go "scorched Earth" against Every Democrat.
Blogger Roger Amick said...
One of the meetings was a private conversation between Sessions and Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak that took place in September in the senator’s office, at the height of what U.S. intelligence officials say was a Russian cyber campaign to upend the U.S. presidential race.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
this doesn't even meet the standard for circumstantial evidence in a court of law. it's fucking laughable.
no sane person can derive from a private conversation that coincidentally aligns with some mythical effort to interfere with our election, that the two are in anyway related or connected.
TDS stage 11.
don't share this nonsense at your next AA meeting. you'll knock everyone in attendance right off the wagon.
30 Senate Democrats met with Russian "hackers" in 2015 to grease the skids on the Iran deal.
How about investigating that?
Sessions was perhaps Trump's most loyal supporter in Congress last year, and he chaired Trump's national security advisory committee.
"he's citing an ancient OP/ED by ruth marcus from the national laughingstock. he was so quick to cite it he neglected to check the date.:"
So, he's drunk again.
Not surprised.
Roger's dreaming of a merry fitzmas....
One of the meetings was a private conversation between Sessions and Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak that took place in September in the senator’s office, at the height of what U.S. intelligence officials say was a Russian cyber campaign to upend the U.S. presidential race.
He had over two dozen private conversations with Ambassadors from other countries.
How many do you suppose were about being bribed over damaging personal information on Donald Trump?
Well, ole Claire was busted...
"As a member of the Armed Services Committee she never had a meeting with or called the Russian Ambassador – “ever.”
The lie detector results are in.
Claire, you DID NOT tell the truth.
Oopsie.
Blogger Roger Amick said...
Sessions was perhaps Trump's most loyal supporter in Congress last year, and he chaired Trump's national security advisory committee.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
and you're 0linsky's most loyal supporter around here, so are we to assume you were the recipient of many of his golden showers?
Loretta Russo said...
Well, ole Claire was busted...
"As a member of the Armed Services Committee she never had a meeting with or called the Russian Ambassador – “ever.”
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
at the very least she lied, and at worst she violated the logan act.
she MUST resign, right rog?
It is simple, really, so I will ask the leftist, What proof do you have that you can share with us?
Claire is a target for the Republicans to take that seat, MO has moved to the Republicans for the first time in like forever, the MO Gov. is Republican and so is the MO House and MO Senate.
Dems still pissed at Comey, of course they are, so his is not being targeted.
How dare they attack a member of the Intell Community,,,, right? , After all the left was outraged , or is that selective outrage.
Post a Comment