 |
| Any Republicans crazy enough to agree? |
In many ways, this is a bizarro-world move that sort of runs completely the opposite of the implied and very tangible threat that the Republicans have in their back pocket. The last thing the Democrats want right now is to see McConnell and the GOP vote to dismantle the filibuster for USSC nominees. But if the Democrats decide to filibuster a very well qualified nominee (who's stock has gone up since his confirmation hearing) and who would be replacing a like minded conservative who passed... it would provide major political cover for the GOP to make the move to eliminate the filibuster. Thus, it would give Trump carte blanche to choose the next USSC nominee (assuming there is one). Politically the Democrats would be much better off fighting that fight if Trump was nominating someone to replace Justices Kennedy, Ginsburg, or Breyer.
So it really begs the question. Why would the Republicans agree to any deal at this point that cuts off their future options, in exchange for helping the Democrats save face over their opposition to a well qualified nominee?
The answer is that they shouldn't. Not unless they are strategically challenged.
78 comments:
Trouble is, sometimes I think they are strategically challenged.
Commonsense said...
Trouble is, sometimes I think they are strategically challenged.
Unlike you, the mentally challenged.
I guess Paul's not the only one living rent-free in your head.
Blogger Mr .2% said...
I guess Paul's not the only one living rent-free in your head.
LOL at you lack of originality. I wouldn't expect anything less from a drop out cultist like you.
"The Buzz is that the Democrats are looking to cut a deal which would allow an up or down vote on Justice Gorsuch in exchange for a Republican promise "not" to eliminate the filibuster on any subsequent nominations to the Supreme Court."
No deal.
Never forget.
"Trouble is, sometimes I think they are strategically challenged."
Never underestimate Republican's ability to get complacent and allow the demons to walk all over them.
No one eats their own better than the McCains and McConnells....
I watched about half of the first day interview. Gorsuch doesn't cause me much concern. The fact that he made two comments that ripped the skin off Mr Trump exhibited a strength of character. He's not a Scalia clone, at all. I suspect that he, like Chief Justice Roberts, will be far less ideological than the alt-right than they want.
Schumer said that he will filibuster, unless the Republicans don't block filibusters in the future.
http://time.com/4710614/donald-trump-fbi-surveillance-house-intelligence-committee/
Can Mr Trump handle the truth?
Don't just jump into the FAKE NEWS road to hell. Really, you should read it.
Schumer said that he will filibuster, unless the Republicans don't block filibusters in the future.
McConnell says Gorsuch will be confirmed, one way or the other.
Meaning if the Democrats filibuster, McConnell will go nuclear and then it will be weekend at Bernie time with Ginsburgh and Breyer.
Every time a liberal ask a question about Trump it invariably gets thrown back in their face.
Remember when they said Trump should accept the results of the election?
Well he accepted them just fine. Liberals? No so much.
Same thing with handling the truth. He'll do just fine. Liberals? Not so much.
Meaning if the Democrats filibuster, McConnell will go nuclear and then it will be weekend at Bernie time with Ginsburgh and Breyer.
Donks will rue the day dingy Harry eliminated the filibuster, just so they could pack the DC circuit court
Schumer said that he will filibuster
Schumer is bluffing when everybody in the world can see his hole card.
Right now I think he's just prepping his base for when he folds.
Roger - So another story from another reporter who simply takes Trump literally but not seriously?
In other words, another reporter chasing the "red herring" of semantics.
The "serious" nature of Trump's claims was that communications of him and his associates were being monitored during the election (under the overall supervision of DOJ and ultimately the President).
It looks more and more (one way or the other) that this is true. That whether it be by "accident" or "accidentally on purpose" or literally "on purpose" communications of Trump associates were being monitored, unclassified, and ultimately leaked.
President Obama used executive action to declassify (or distribute) this information only three days prior to Trump being inaugurated. The only explanation for this action provided at this time, was to allow for more people to have the information, which would allow for more possibility of leaks, and less of a likelihood that the leakers could be identified. Why otherwise would a President essentially "declassify" potentially damaging political information about the man taking over the wheel - only days before his tenure was done?
For that action alone, Obama solidified his place in my mind as easily the most blatantly partisan President in our lifetime. A man who almost childishly clings to his liberal dogma and Party-first/Country-second actions.
Don't just jump into the FAKE NEWS road to hell. Really, you should read it.
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
MANAFORT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!111111111111111111111111111!!!!!
Blogger Roger Amick said...
Schumer said that he will filibuster, unless the Republicans don't block filibusters in the future.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
chuckles the clown schumer. the greatest thing EVAH to happen to the GOP.
dumb fuck chuck has two choices -
lose quickly or lose slowly.
but either way, he loses.
President Obama used executive action to declassify (or distribute) this information only three days prior to Trump being inaugurated. The only explanation for this action provided at this time, was to allow for more people to have the information, which would allow for more possibility of leaks, and less of a likelihood that the leakers could be identified. Why otherwise would a President essentially "declassify" potentially damaging political information about the man taking over the wheel - only days before his tenure was done?
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
i distinctly remember roger calling 0linsky's action an act of patriotism.
http://time.com/4710456/donald-trump-time-interview-truth-falsehood/
I posted the wrong link.
This is the interview, read it.
Seriously, he's erratic.
Trumpism is not curable.
The claim that Muslims celebrated on 9-11 in New Jersey…
Well if you look at the reporter, he wrote the story in the Washington Post.
But my idea is that whatever the reality of what you are describing, the fact that they are disputed makes them a more effective message, that you are able to spread the message further, that more people get excited about it, that it gets on TV.
Well now if you take a look at the votes, when I say that, I mean mostly they register wrong, in other words, for the votes, they register incorrectly, and/or illegally. And they then vote. You have tremendous numbers of people. In fact I’m forming a committee on it.
But there’s no evidence that 3 million people voted with…
We’ll see after the committee. I have people say it was more than that. We will see after we have. But there will be, we are forming a committee. And we are going to do a study on it, a very serious problem.
Is there anything different about making these kinds of predictions without having the factual evidence as President?
I’m a very instinctual person, but my instinct turns out to be right. When everyone said I wasn’t going to win the election, I said well I think I would. You know it is interesting, somebody came up to me and said the other day, gee whiz, the New York Times and other people, you know other groups, had you down at one percent, well, I said no I think I am going to win, and people smiled, George Stephanopoulos laughed, you remember. He thought it was very cute, and very funny. Other people smiled. And some people, the smart people or the people that know me didn’t laugh at all. There are people that know me, like Carl Icahn and many others, that didn’t laugh at all, they thought I was going to win, because they understand how I, they understand me. They get it. But you take a look and guess what, I won, and I won easily. I predicted Brexit. Remember they said there was no way to get to 270? Well I ended up at 306. I had election night, 306. But there was no way to get to, in fact I went to Maine four times, four times I went to Maine, because I had to get one vote, because there was no way to get to 270, but I ended up getting to 306. Brexit, I predicted Brexit, you remember that, the day before the event. I said, no, Brexit is going to happen, and everybody laughed, and Brexit happened. Many many things. They turn out to be right. And now today, Devin Nunes, just had a news conference.
So you're basically upset that all of what Trump was saying turned out to be right?
dumb fuck chuck has two choices -
lose quickly or lose slowly.
I vote quickly. Then they can redo healthcare without worrying about the filibuster.
Trump wants center right Justice for scotus, not alt right. Except for immigration, trump is pretty moderate.
Blogger Roger Amick said...
Trumpism is not curable.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
and the irony is that those who make this claim are up to their eyeballs in TDS.
trump is being trump. those who take him seriously are not alarmed.
those who take him literally need psychotherapy.
Democrats please be assholes and don't vote for this Nomminee, force the Republicans to go to the Ried Rule, please.
Then when the next USSC Nominee comes up, Trump get another on , this time with only 51 votes.
So please do obstruct
Commonsense said...
So you're basically upset that all of what Trump was saying turned out to be right?"
Yep.
The Trump administration will approve the Keystone XL oil pipeline by Monday, reversing one of former President Barack Obama’s most politically charged environmental decisions, according to two sources with knowledge of the plan.
http://www.politico.com/story/2017/03/state-department-to-approve-keystone-pipeline-permit-236414
excellent.
the sound of liberal heads exploding is a sound to behold.
President Trump has a transparent Government, the left hates it, he does not move in secret with his friends, nor does he move against his enemies in secret, he comes at them in full view just to watch then wither and be publically defeated.
SO when does the DNC-Networks start to apologize to the President for being so wrong so often?
hey roger,
i just wanted you to know that i've nominated you for a lifetime vagina award.
if chelsea clinton deserves one for absolutely no reason at all, then you definitely deserve one for keeping us entertained around here.
Trump is getting America back to work, after the "8 lost years".
Pay checks and Prosperity are back in style.
Oh and US HOUSING, new home purchases skyrocketed. Roger Krugman said sales were down during the lost years because no one was building houses , so none to buy, what a load of dumb shit, the coffee carrier knows nothing of the housing industry.
The master negotiator is fucking out of luck. Obama Care is alive and well.
Roger Amick said...
The master negotiator is fucking out of luck. Obama Care is alive and well.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
out of luck?
LOL.
we're just getting started. and your favorite boogey men - the koch bros. - are backing the freedom caucus with million$.
Roger doesn't know Obamacare is as dead as a doornail even if the Republicans do nothing?
excellent.
the sound of liberal heads exploding is a sound to behold.
The snowflakes are already having a massive meltdown.
Blogger Commonsense said...
Roger doesn't know Obamacare is as dead as a doornail even if the Republicans do nothing?
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
irony of ironies -
0linsky-care is in worse shape than his own liver.
Senator Lindsey Graham Moderate Republican : I’ll Do ‘Whatever It Takes’ to Get Gorsuch Confirmed, If Dems Filibuster, ‘We Would Have to Change the Rules’"
When you push hard enough, Even , Senator Lindsey Gramham has had enough of Sen Cuckhold Schumers bs.
Remember when the Dems where in the Majority and they wanted all of us to get along?
Well apparently Roger believes that in politics... if at first you don't succeed, you throw in the towel.
We'll see what happens. Certainly there will be a vote sometime in the near future. But Trump is correct. Those who vote against this repeal put themselves in danger of having a well funded primary opponent. I wonder how the "freedom caucus" would feel about having their members being challenged, as generally it's the far right who likes to challenge moderates.
That being said... the repeal bill being pushed in the House is unlikely to clear the Senate, even through reconciliation. This is not going to happen overnight, and I would think that "rushing" is not exactly the best strategy here.
Spam by the drunkard
Retreat!!!!!!!!! Unbelievable the master negotiator is flummoxed, :-) :-) :-)
CH always says But Trump is correct.
It's incurable.
Roger Krugman, you do know the vote was only delayed and the vote will still take place?
Did you loss money in the Stock Market?
I'm so crazy, that I'm eating Pollo de Res
Beaner©rrb food.
Roger Krugman, how long after Obama was elected did it take him to get the UN-Affordable Care Bill on his desk?
Anonymous KD, Opie not everyone pay into SS, did you learn that yet? said...
Did you figure out that your asshole swallowed a goat????/ Or the quality of the discourse here is about as cogent as a 2 year olds diaper???? Unbelievable the lengths you all go to defend the loser who is having his ass handed to him in such a fantastic way by the party he allegedly leads as a democrat. Ouch....
K'putz, I have two defined benefit pensions, Social Security and Medicare, that under Kaiser Permanente my max out of pocket is $4,400. Thanks for paying for my transplant!
. if at first you don't succeed, you throw in the towel.
Another CH truism that we should all laugh at...Brilliant commentary CH, only loretta has said something dumber than that today.... a low bar even for this place......LOLOL
K Dunce sits at his goat farm licking cheeto dust off his fingers as he realizes the republicon' dream he lives is nothing more than masturbation in his demented mind. BTW roger, according to the dunce, you are just another parasite sucking off the govmt as he gets subsidies to keep his sorry ass farm polluting the environment and damming rivers he thinks he can and thinks those down stream from him have no rights IDIOTs.....
That was fun.
two raw nerves hit by my sand paper.
The Nester Case decided by the USSC stated Social Security is not yours, you paid in, but not a penny is yours.
Roger Amick said...
http://time.com/4710614/donald-trump-fbi-surveillance-house-intelligence-committee/
Can Mr Trump handle the truth?
Don't just jump into the FAKE NEWS road to hell. Really, you should read it.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
if you like your doctor you can keep your doctor.
if you like your insurance you can keep your insurance.
the ACA will save the average family $2500/year.
I have two defined benefit pensions, Social Security and Medicare, that under Kaiser Permanente my max out of pocket is $4,400.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
and a mortgage.
"mic drop."
Looks like junior is as big an ass as his old man. The apple fell right under donnie's fat ass!!!!
In reaction to an attack in London on Wednesday, Donald Trump Jr. took his grievances with the city's mayor to Twitter.
He wrote: "You have to be kidding me?!: Terror attacks are part of living in big city, says London Mayor Sadiq Khan."
But that's not true. The mayor didn't say that. And he definitely didn't say that right after his city was attacked.
To be fair, the article Trump Jr. linked is misleading. It's titled, "Sadiq Khan: London mayor says terror attacks 'part and parcel' of living in a major city." Khan actually said the threat is "part and parcel" — not the attacks themselves.
Looks to me rat is jealous of Rogers retirement....wonder what he has since he too is a loser salesman who works for commission and has not defined plan for shit.....Better hope SS stays solvent, it is all he has. BIG FUCKING CHUCKLE!!!!!!
the ACA will save the average family $2500/year.
And that's what trump care will cost you more a year while driving millions off insurance. LOL good.....hope they get their shit together and vote tonight!!!!
two raw nerves hit by my sand paper.
You must love having grit shoved up your ass daily......LOL Idiot....go dam a river.
Sadiq Khan: London mayor says terror attacks 'part and parcel' of living in a major city
Labour politician says capitals 'have got to be prepared' for attacks like New York bombing
Gabriel Samuels @gabs_samuels Thursday 22 September 2016 14:13 BST
Sadiq Khan has said he believes the threat of terror attacks are “part and parcel of living in a big city” and encouraged Londoners to be vigilant to combat dangers.
The Mayor of London revealed he had a “sleepless night” after the recent bombing in New York, and said major cities around the world “have got to be prepared for these sorts of things” to happen when people least expect them.
so yeah, mayor raghead DID say that.
The CBO just hammered the last nail in the coffin.
We make into six figures, guaranteed for life.
Kiss my Lily white ass.
so yeah, mayor raged DID say that.
So.....and donnie's spawn remains as big an asshole as you, rat, except for one thing.....his daddy is potus and yours is not....LOLOLOL!!!!!!
Seems that Roger Krugman is very unsure of his financials, no wonder , given how he has botched them.
The CBO just hammered the last nail in the coffin." Roger Krugman
Really , do tell.
Last I heard from the news CBO said the changes under consideration will make no difference in number of people covered .
Odd, how can CBO make that claim?
We make into six figures, guaranteed for life."
Funny Roger Krugman got confused on what I asked him, It was not about his make believe income.
How much of that goes to your ex wife Roger or did you cheat her out of what was hers?
better hope SS stays solvent" Opie
Omg, that is funny and stupid, you really believe taking from the checks of kids working today to pay those old queens like you is a solvent system.
News flash for ya, it is a Ponzi Scheme.
IF this was a privately held company , it would be shut down and those at the top )like Maddoff) would be in jail.
Anonymous KD, the goat fucker said....it's a ponzi scheme
Yep, it's a ponzi scheme that you and many americans depend on.... a lot of them are stupid republicon's like yourself. If you had a brain, you would unplug your computer and service your goats....That the best you got....yep, yer still an idiot.
"and a mortgage.
"mic drop.""
A financial planner he "ain't"
A financial planner he "ain't"
An intellectual you ain't either.....idiot.
LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL
But there’s other things you said that haven’t panned out. The peg for this story is the wiretapping hearing on Monday, in which [FBI Director James] Comey and [NSA Director Mike] Rogers testified about your tweets there.
http://time.com/4710456/donald-trump-time-interview-truth-falsehood/
Yeah well if you’d look at, in fact I’ll give you the front page story, and just today I heard, just a little while ago, that Devin Nunes had a news conference, did you hear about this, where they have a lot of information on tapping. Did you hear about that?
House Intelligence Committee Democrats said Chairman Devin Nunes (R-Calif.) apologized to them Thursday during a closed-door meeting for his handling of revelations about surveillance that potentially could have been collected about President Trump and his associates during the transition period.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/powerpost/house-intelligence-chair-nunes-apologizes-for-how-he-handled-revelations-surrounding-trump-and-his-aides/2017/03/23/344b05e2-0fc8-11e7-9d5a-a83e627dc120_story.html?utm_term=.cb7b8271fbfe
http://time.com/4710456/donald-trump-time-interview-truth-falsehood/
But there’s other things you said that haven’t panned out. The peg for this story is the wiretapping hearing on Monday, in which [FBI Director James] Comey and [NSA Director Mike] Rogers testified about your tweets there.
Yeah well if you’d look at, in fact I’ll give you the front page story, and just today I heard, just a little while ago, that Devin Nunes had a news conference, did you hear about this, where they have a lot of information on tapping. Did you hear about that?
Now remember this. When I said wiretapping, it was in quotes. Because a wiretapping is, you know today it is different than wire tapping. It is just a good description. But wiretapping was in quotes.
The tweet in question.. No quotes. He issued a later revision with " " but this is the original.
Donald J. Trump
✔
@realDonaldTrump
How low has President Obama gone to tapp my phones during the very sacred election process. This is Nixon/Watergate. Bad (or sick) guy!
The claim that Muslims celebrated on 9-11 in New Jersey…
Well if you look at the reporter, he wrote the story in the Washington Post.
The story did not exist. Search all you want, it's not there. He lied, again.
But there’s no evidence that 3 million people voted with…
We’ll see after the committee. I have people say it was more than that. We will see after we have. But there will be, we are forming a committee. And we are going to do a study on it, a very serious problem.
He claimed that all three million illegals voted for Hillary Clinton. There is absolutely no evidence to support that claim. You believe it, because "Trump is right"
. You say that Ted Cruz’s father was with Lee Harvey Oswald.
Well that was in a newspaper. No, no, I like Ted Cruz, he’s a friend of mine. But that was in the newspaper. I wasn’t, I didn’t say that. I was referring to a newspaper. A Ted Cruz article referred to a newspaper story with, had a picture of Ted Cruz, his father, and Lee Harvey Oswald, having breakfast.
I can't post a picture here, bur the "newspaper" he was referring to is the National Inquirer. Do you think that is a credible source to make that kind of claim? Or is it "Trump is right" again? But you can see it here, on this link. http://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/624/cpsprodpb/CD73/production/_89559525_04f05e23-b674-46fe-894b-9700d0e64096.jpg
I didn't use any fact sites. It took about an hour to look up the data that showed he lied multiple times in the interview with Time Magazine.
#trumpisalwaysright
Oh Oh folks. Seriously.. Reuters has a BOMB
Russia says it was in touch with Trump's campaign during election
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-russia-trump-idUSKBN1351RJ
By Andrew Osborn | MOSCOW
The Russian government was in touch with members of President-elect Donald Trump's political team during the U.S. election campaign and knows most of his entourage, one of Russia's most senior diplomats told the Interfax news agency on Thursday.
Accused by defeated Democratic contender Hillary Clinton of being a puppet of President Vladimir Putin after praising the Russian leader, Trump has dismissed suggestions he had anything to do with the Russian government during the campaign.
But in comments that could prove politically awkward for the president-elect, Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov said there had indeed been some communications.
"There were contacts," Interfax cited Ryabkov as saying. "We are doing this and have been doing this during the election campaign."
Such contacts would continue, he added, saying the Russian government knew and had been in touch with many of Trump's closest allies. He did not name names.
"Obviously, we know most of the people from his (Trump's)entourage. Those people have always been in the limelight in the United States and have occupied high-ranking positions," he said.
"I cannot say that all of them, but quite a few have been staying in touch with Russian representatives."
Moscow was just beginning to consider how to go about setting up more formal channels to communicate with the future Trump administration, said Ryabkov.
A spokeswoman for Trump did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
FBI INQUIRY
The Federal Bureau of Investigation opened a preliminary inquiry in recent months into allegations that Trump or his associates might have had questionable dealings with Russian people or businesses, but found no evidence to warrant opening a full investigation, according to sources familiar with the matter. The agency has not publicly discussed the probe.
The U.S. government has blamed Russia for cyber attacks on Democratic Party organizations.
Trump, who has spoken of his desire to improve tattered U.S.-Russia ties, has said he might meet Putin before his inauguration, but Putin's spokesman has said there are currently no plans for such a meeting.
Interfax reported on Wednesday that Dmitry Peskov, Putin's spokesman, would be in New York this week for a chess tournament, a few blocks from Trump Tower, where the president-elect has his office.
This isn't "Fake News" but Trump is always right, so says CH.
"Oh Oh folks. Seriously.. Reuters has a BOMB"
A bomb back in November, LOL.
This is a little more recent:
Potential 'smoking gun' showing Obama administration spied on Trump team, source says
Classified intelligence showing incidental collection of Trump team communications, purportedly seen by committee Chairman Devin Nunes, R-Calif., and described by him in vague terms at a bombshell Wednesday afternoon news conference, came from multiple sources, Capitol Hill sources told Fox News. The intelligence corroborated information about surveillance of the Trump team that was known to Nunes, sources said, even before President Trump accused his predecessor of having wiretapped him in a series of now-infamous tweets posted on March 4.
The intelligence is said to leave no doubt the Obama administration, in its closing days, was using the cover of legitimate surveillance on foreign targets to spy on President-elect Trump, according to sources.
The key to that conclusion is the unmasking of selected U.S. persons whose names appeared in the intelligence, the sources said, adding that the paper trail leaves no other plausible purpose for the unmasking other than to damage the incoming Trump administration.
If true, it should be a scandal of Watergate proportions.
It goes without saying that if Obama was a Republican, it would already had been one.
Blogger Roger Amick said...
Oh Oh folks. Seriously.. Reuters has a BOMB
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
a four and a half month old bomb?
you don't say???
LOL.
The U.S. government has blamed Russia for cyber attacks on Democratic Party organizations.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
uh, no.
DEMOCRATS have blamed Russia for cyber attacks on Democratic Party organizations.
Good Morning to Opie and Roger.
Opie, because I am honest and your well, challenged, I will go over this one more time.
I have not paid into Medicare or SS, I used that money to invest over the years in the US in the form of buying land during times that were rough in the US AG Business and ranchers need to sell land. I also carefully Invested in the US Stock Market using the Vanguard S & P 500 stock index and hold stock for over 7 years in a little company called The Home Depot.
Let me repeat I have not paid into Medicare or SS, so I will not be applying for nor receiving from those two failed systems. Over my work life I did not have those funds taken, so all I have invested is mine, you can not say the same of those two systems you are depended upon.
I would never put my family at that kind of financial risk where I do not control the money or have any legal claim to it.
Funny Roger Krugman got confused on what I asked him, It was not about his make believe income.
How much of that goes to your ex wife Roger or did you cheat her out of what was hers?
Did you loss money in the US Stock Market ?
I know you will feel a need to run from issues you bring up, can't find a cut n paste for this , so do what you do best, run little rabbit.
RK and Opie, You tow envy us that have wealth, good news, President Trump paid more in that boom bombshell release by Maddow then :
Hillary
Obama
Biden
have in their life times combined.
sounds about right...
"It’s now clear what happened. The Obama people started spying on Trump once he had the nomination or perhaps even earlier. They may have started earlier with an eye on helping the Republicans knock him off in the primary, but that’s not clear. They figured that Clinton was a lock so they were not careful about covering their tracks. The Clinton people are as dirty as it gets so they were not going to be ratting on anyone over it. If anything, they would expand on it.
This is where the Russian hacking story comes into the picture. Once disaster struck and Team Obama realized they had a problem, they needed cover, so they started with the Russian hacking nonsense. They would then claim that it was all an accident and they were just trying to prevent Boris Badenov and Natasha Fatale from attacking our democracy! It’s also why Obama signed a retroactive Executive Order giving cover to the intel agencies for their domestic spying activities. They were creating a cover story.
The complication is that it appears that at least one person has perjured himself over this and that one person is FBI Director Comey. There’s no way to square his testimony with these new revelations. The best he can do is split hairs and claim he was not part of the spying effort. Of course, there’s no way to touch him as he runs the FBI. In fact, there’s no way to investigate any of the intelligence organizations. This is the point where many of the robot historians of the future will say the American political class murdered itself."
--The Z Man
Anonymous KD, said...
Good Morning to Opie and Roger.
Opie, because I am honest and your well, challenged,
Go suck a goat......asswipe I guess delusion is all you have. Good for you.
Opie , I really hope your life is not a dark as you paint it to be here.
Is it because you thought the SS payments you depend upon where "yours" and I informed you that they are not?
Or is it because I will never, Thank God, have to depend on those working today to pay my way in life and your having a really hard time dealing?
Post a Comment