With all of those donations to their foundation drying up after her loss... I guess there was the need to make some more money. $$$ Is anyone planning on reading this?
CHT, will I read it, no. I will give the $25.00 to save the children, who are helping the Hurricane victims with, diapers, formula and food, to name a few.
IT IS FAR MORE INTELLIGENT TO POINT OUT THAT SHE IS
Clinton the Pragmatist
Ezra Klein: “What Happened has been sold as Clinton’s apologia for her 2016 campaign, and it is that. But it’s more remarkable for Clinton’s extended defense of a political style that has become unfashionable in both the Republican and Democratic parties.
"Clinton is not a radical or a revolutionary, a disruptor or a socialist, and she’s proud of that fact. She’s a pragmatist who believes in working within the system, in promising roughly what you believe you can deliver, in saying how you’ll pay for your plans. She is frustrated by a polity that doesn’t share her ‘thrill’ over incremental policies that help real people or her skepticism of sweeping plans that will never come to fruition. She believes in politics the way it is actually practiced, and she holds to that belief at a moment when it’s never been less popular.
“This makes Clinton a more unusual figure than she gets credit for being: Not only does she refuse to paint an inspiring vision of a political process rid of corruption, partisanship, and rancor, but she’s also actively dismissive of those promises and the politicians who make them.”
IT IS FAR MORE INTELLIGENT TO POINT OUT THAT SHE IS A HABITUAL LIAR
As Hillary Clinton came under increasing scrutiny for her story about facing sniper fire in Bosnia, one question that arose was whether she has engaged in a pattern of lying.
The now-retired general counsel and chief of staff of the House Judiciary Committee, who supervised Hillary when she worked on the Watergate investigation, says Hillary’s history of lies and unethical behavior goes back farther – and goes much deeper – than anyone realizes.
Jerry Zeifman, a lifelong Democrat, supervised the work of 27-year-old Hillary Rodham on the committee. Hillary got a job working on the investigation at the behest of her former law professor, Burke Marshall, who was also Sen. Ted Kennedy’s chief counsel in the Chappaquiddick affair. When the investigation was over, Zeifman fired Hillary from the committee staff and refused to give her a letter of recommendation – one of only three people who earned that dubious distinction in Zeifman’s 17-year career. Why?
“Because she was a liar,” Zeifman said in an interview last week. “She was an unethical, dishonest lawyer. She conspired to violate the Constitution, the rules of the House, the rules of the committee and the rules of confidentiality.”
It wasn't an "unfashionable political style" James. It wasn't about pragmatism vs anything else. And her real problems weren't any of the long list of excuses and shame/blaming in her pathetic book. A book that no one is going to take seriously, other than those grasping at straws to deny how badly they got suckered by the illusion, and how badly those delusions will ultimately damage this country.
The one problem that Clinton faced which led to her failure was this: because of her long history of deceit, dishonesty and phoney "accomplishments", the American public trusted her LESS than even Donald Trump, and viewed her MORE as a charlatan than he. ALL of Clinton's excuses arose ultimately from her own character defects.
Ezra Klein: “'What Happened' has been sold as Clinton’s apologia for her 2016 campaign, and it is that. But it’s more remarkable for Clinton’s extended defense of a political style that has become unfashionable in both the Republican and Democratic parties.
"Clinton is not a radical or a revolutionary, a disruptor or a socialist, and she’s proud of that fact. She’s a pragmatist who believes in working within the system, in promising roughly what you believe you can deliver, in saying how you’ll pay for your plans. She is frustrated by a polity that doesn’t share her ‘thrill’ over incremental policies that help real people or her skepticism of sweeping plans that will never come to fruition. She believes in politics the way it is actually practiced, and she holds to that belief at a moment when it’s never been less popular.
“This makes Clinton a more unusual figure than she gets credit for being: Not only does she refuse to paint an inspiring vision of a political process rid of corruption, partisanship, and rancor, but she’s also actively dismissive of those promises and the politicians who make them.”
As Hillary Clinton came under increasing scrutiny for her story about facing sniper fire in Bosnia, one question that arose was whether she has engaged in a pattern of lying.
The now-retired general counsel and chief of staff of the House Judiciary Committee, who supervised Hillary when she worked on the Watergate investigation, says Hillary’s history of lies and unethical behavior goes back farther – and goes much deeper – than anyone realizes.
Jerry Zeifman, a lifelong Democrat, supervised the work of 27-year-old Hillary Rodham on the committee. Hillary got a job working on the investigation at the behest of her former law professor, Burke Marshall, who was also Sen. Ted Kennedy’s chief counsel in the Chappaquiddick affair. When the investigation was over, Zeifman fired Hillary from the committee staff and refused to give her a letter of recommendation – one of only three people who earned that dubious distinction in Zeifman’s 17-year career. Why?
“Because she was a liar,” Zeifman said in an interview last week. “She was an unethical, dishonest lawyer. She conspired to violate the Constitution, the rules of the House, the rules of the committee and the rules of confidentiality.”
Not my fault James - I didn't vote for either immoral person. That's on people like you, the "ends justifies the means" folks who didn't realize that the morally challenged Clinton could easily lose.
Had more of Clinton's voters had the integrity to vote their real preference, instead of being gulled into the mindset that only Clinton could win, we wouldn't have Trump.
I warned you James and you laughed it off. And now when it's proven that I was right - that Clinton WAS the candidate that Trump could beat - you blame ME for her loss? Can you not see how absurd that is?
I don't know that Bernie can beat an incumbent Trump, his age would be an issue. But I'm not too worried about finding candidates at this point. In my view it's more important to reform the DNC leadership, whose corrupt politics put them in this position. I believe they still have some work to do.
"I warned you James and you laughed it off. And now when it's proven that I was right - that Clinton WAS the candidate that Trump could beat - you blame ME for her loss? Can you not see how absurd that is?"
19 comments:
That book and this tome are at the top of my lists
i can't remember seeing another book where the question and the answer are right there on the cover.
Exactly Cali.
CHT, will I read it, no. I will give the $25.00 to save the children, who are helping the Hurricane victims with, diapers, formula and food, to name a few.
She is on the "Wasn't me tour".
Thing this song (was't me by Shaggy-Licious) when you hear Sir Shrillery Clinto.
IT IS FAR MORE INTELLIGENT TO POINT OUT THAT SHE IS
Clinton the Pragmatist
Ezra Klein: “What Happened has been sold as Clinton’s apologia for her 2016 campaign, and it is that. But it’s more remarkable for Clinton’s extended defense of a political style that has become unfashionable in both the Republican and Democratic parties.
"Clinton is not a radical or a revolutionary, a disruptor or a socialist, and she’s proud of that fact. She’s a pragmatist who believes in working within the system, in promising roughly what you believe you can deliver, in saying how you’ll pay for your plans. She is frustrated by a polity that doesn’t share her ‘thrill’ over incremental policies that help real people or her skepticism of sweeping plans that will never come to fruition. She believes in politics the way it is actually practiced, and she holds to that belief at a moment when it’s never been less popular.
“This makes Clinton a more unusual figure than she gets credit for being: Not only does she refuse to paint an inspiring vision of a political process rid of corruption, partisanship, and rancor, but she’s also actively dismissive of those promises and the politicians who make them.”
IT IS FAR MORE INTELLIGENT TO POINT OUT THAT SHE IS A HABITUAL LIAR
As Hillary Clinton came under increasing scrutiny for her story about facing sniper fire in Bosnia, one question that arose was whether she has engaged in a pattern of lying.
The now-retired general counsel and chief of staff of the House Judiciary Committee, who supervised Hillary when she worked on the Watergate investigation, says Hillary’s history of lies and unethical behavior goes back farther – and goes much deeper – than anyone realizes.
Jerry Zeifman, a lifelong Democrat, supervised the work of 27-year-old
Hillary Rodham on the committee. Hillary got a job working on the investigation at the behest of her former law professor, Burke Marshall, who was also Sen. Ted Kennedy’s chief counsel in the Chappaquiddick affair. When the investigation was over, Zeifman fired Hillary from the committee staff and refused to give her a letter of recommendation – one of only three people who earned that dubious distinction in Zeifman’s 17-year career.
Why?
“Because she was a liar,” Zeifman said in an interview last week. “She was an unethical, dishonest lawyer. She conspired to violate the Constitution, the rules of the House, the rules of the committee and the rules of confidentiality.”
It wasn't an "unfashionable political style" James. It wasn't about pragmatism vs anything else. And her real problems weren't any of the long list of excuses and shame/blaming in her pathetic book. A book that no one is going to take seriously, other than those grasping at straws to deny how badly they got suckered by the illusion, and how badly those delusions will ultimately damage this country.
The one problem that Clinton faced which led to her failure was this: because of her long history of deceit, dishonesty and phoney "accomplishments", the American public trusted her LESS than even Donald Trump, and viewed her MORE as a charlatan than he. ALL of Clinton's excuses arose ultimately from her own character defects.
IT IS FAR MORE INTELLIGENT TO SAY----
Clinton the Pragmatist
Ezra Klein: “'What Happened' has been sold as Clinton’s apologia for her 2016 campaign, and it is that. But it’s more remarkable for Clinton’s extended defense of a political style that has become unfashionable in both the Republican and Democratic parties.
"Clinton is not a radical or a revolutionary, a disruptor or a socialist, and she’s proud of that fact. She’s a pragmatist who believes in working within the system, in promising roughly what you believe you can deliver, in saying how you’ll pay for your plans. She is frustrated by a polity that doesn’t share her ‘thrill’ over incremental policies that help real people or her skepticism of sweeping plans that will never come to fruition. She believes in politics the way it is actually practiced, and she holds to that belief at a moment when it’s never been less popular.
“This makes Clinton a more unusual figure than she gets credit for being: Not only does she refuse to paint an inspiring vision of a political process rid of corruption, partisanship, and rancor, but she’s also actively dismissive of those promises and the politicians who make them.”
IT IS FAR MORE INTELLIGENT TO POINT OUT THE TRUTH
As Hillary Clinton came under increasing scrutiny for her story about facing sniper fire in Bosnia, one question that arose was whether she has engaged in a pattern of lying.
The now-retired general counsel and chief of staff of the House Judiciary Committee, who supervised Hillary when she worked on the Watergate investigation, says Hillary’s history of lies and unethical behavior goes back farther – and goes much deeper – than anyone realizes.
Jerry Zeifman, a lifelong Democrat, supervised the work of 27-year-old
Hillary Rodham on the committee. Hillary got a job working on the investigation at the behest of her former law professor, Burke Marshall, who was also Sen. Ted Kennedy’s chief counsel in the Chappaquiddick affair. When the investigation was over, Zeifman fired Hillary from the committee staff and refused to give her a letter of recommendation – one of only three people who earned that dubious distinction in Zeifman’s 17-year career.
Why?
“Because she was a liar,” Zeifman said in an interview last week. “She was an unethical, dishonest lawyer. She conspired to violate the Constitution, the rules of the House, the rules of the committee and the rules of confidentiality.”
ROFLMFAO !!!
Wp, your excessive criticism of this woman and the attitude you represent has saddled this nation with the Trumpisticatastrophe.
History will record Trump as a far bigger liar than Hillary.
ROFL (I don't have a FA to LO.)
Right, pompous james who thinks he is the judge of all men and the writer of all history.
and who is going to get some more jarring realities as he did last November
ROFLMFAO !!!
Not my fault James - I didn't vote for either immoral person. That's on people like you, the "ends justifies the means" folks who didn't realize that the morally challenged Clinton could easily lose.
Had more of Clinton's voters had the integrity to vote their real preference, instead of being gulled into the mindset that only Clinton could win, we wouldn't have Trump.
I warned you James and you laughed it off. And now when it's proven that I was right - that Clinton WAS the candidate that Trump could beat - you blame ME for her loss? Can you not see how absurd that is?
Wp, there is hope, Uncle Bernie 2020.
I don't know that Bernie can beat an incumbent Trump, his age would be an issue. But I'm not too worried about finding candidates at this point. In my view it's more important to reform the DNC leadership, whose corrupt politics put them in this position. I believe they still have some work to do.
"I warned you James and you laughed it off. And now when it's proven that I was right - that Clinton WAS the candidate that Trump could beat - you blame ME for her loss? Can you not see how absurd that is?"
You won't get an answer from him...
Jane has no opinion of his own.
Hillary blamed Red M & M's for her loss
Wp , zogby polling was paid to poll Dems for 2020.
Leading
Bernie Sanders
Warren
Biden
Allstars all of them.
Post a Comment