Everything the Democrats do is about bringing down Trump

Does that sound paranoid? 

So Al Franken announced that he would be (sometime in the not so well defined future)  resigning his seat in the Senate. About a hundred million Democrats collectively offered the opinion that if Franken goes, then by all accounts Trump should go too. The facts that the Franken allegations were not aired prior to his elections, and that many of the allegations took place while he was an actual Senator seems lost on these millions of Democrats. But TDS has a tendency to do that to people.

Of course, wasn't that the play here all along? If Democrats could get a couple of their own to fall on the proverbial sword, then the Party could claim the "higher moral ground" and start to selectively attack the Republicans, taking dead aim at the President. Who cares if they once supported a President accused of rape, settled a sexual harassment claim while in office, and who admitted receiving sexual favors from a White House intern who was half his age. That was then. This is now. Democrats have changed, unless you consider they still support Senator Menendez in New Jersey (or at least until the Democratic Governor takes office - then all bets are off).

Here is the reality. There was no Russia/Trump collusion. Only the really off center tin foil hat wearing conspiracy nuts still believe that special counsel is going to uncover some nefarious plot to steal the election. The Special Counsel investigation hacks are now leaking post election transition team actions and making suggestions about which conversations might be covered up, in order to cover up the actual cover up of a crime that nobody suggests can be proven. The original hope of Robert Mueller bringing down some widespread felony conspiracy has been replaced by non-related charges and process crimes, and the hope that more unrelated charges and/or process crimes might follow; with the ultimate goal of finding something that could allow Mueller to recommend that the President "obstructed justice".

But the problem with trying to prove that a President obstructed Justice is the very fact that it's more a philosophical argument than a matter of criminal investigation.  Considering how many experts believe that Presidential authority takes precedent over someone's opinion as to the President's motive, makes it fairly necessary that Mueller can prove bad intent. Moreover, he needs to prove it to the degree that it would convince partisan Republicans. The chances that Mueller can find some smoking gun evidence that proves corrupt or criminal intent to that degree is probably not much better than was his chances of finding the smoking gun evidence of collusion.

While we may not be quite at the point where your rank and file Democrats and Democratic supporters are willing to accept this, that day is probably not too far off into the future. What we do know, is that even if the Mueller probe comes up short on all accounts, that it will not stop the liberal pursuit of undoing the 2016 election and bringing down Donald Trump.

Russian Collusion? Nope. Obstruction of Justice? Nope.
Democrats need something new (or will fairly shortly here).

Why not the sexual harassment allegations that were brought up (unsuccessfully) during the election? Certainly those allegations are prime for reconsideration? Especially after a couple of high profile Democrats have been brought down. What's good for the goose and all that. Does anyone not believe that the real reason to push Franken and Conyers out is to create leverage to go after Trump?