“Looking at the yearbook entry,” [Songer] said, “it looks pretty spontaneously prepared — that is, it doesn’t look like the writer stopped and restarted, as though someone were tentative in writing perhaps because they were trying to imitate another writer. It looks very fluid. I don’t see any indications of unnatural writing. The writing seems consistent with one writer,”Beverly Young came out and admitted that it was her who wrote (at least) the date and the place in question in her yearbook. She is still claiming that Roy Moore wrote in her yearbook at that time, and that it was on that date and at that location (which is why she made the notation). Obviously she is still claiming that she was assaulted.
One has to wonder, why this little tidbit of information was not forthcoming in the original allegations and statements? Did she forget that she wrote part of it? Did she find it unimportant, even as people suggested it was partially forged? Seems like a problem for Ms Young and her attorney (who could be in legal trouble if she knew).
Ultimately one has to wonder if Doug Jones wishes that Gloria Allred and Beverly Young could have just as well kept their collective mouths shut, and it might have actually helped the other allegations against Moore retain credibility.
One also has to wonder out loud how the Washington Post and former FBI agents can be so easily fooled by something most anyone could see from a picture? Trump derangement syndrome is the best possible explanation.
12 comments:
at some point jeff bozo's and the WaPo might want to think about getting their money back. if moore wins they're going to look like real assholes.
Hours after publishing a bombshell report claiming members of the Trump campaign and Trump Organization — including then-candidate Donald Trump and Donald Trump Jr. — had received an email from WikiLeaks providing a decryption key and website address to hacked content, CNN has issued a correction noting that it got the date of the email incorrect.
Below is the correction from the CNN report:
Correction: This story has been corrected to say the date of the email was September 14, 2016, not September 4, 2016. The story also changed the headline and removed a tweet from Donald Trump Jr., who posted a message about WikiLeaks on September 4, 2016.
https://www.mediaite.com/tv/cnn-corrects-botched-wikileaks-report-initial-reporting-was-incorrect/
hey alky -
trump doesn't need to "poison" cnn.
the dumb fucks are committing SUICIDE.
Writing in the date and location under a yearbook signature is not evidence of forgery, any more than writing the date and location under a photo in a family album is evidence of a hoax.
This is just a desperate, last-ditch attempt from the Party of Pedophilia to defend its poster candidate.
And, quite frankly, if at this point anyone is still carrying water for Roy Moore, they are complicit. Any such person is on the moral level of a child molester.
Writing in the date and location under a yearbook signature is not evidence of forgery
Per se no, but not revealing that fact initially and allowing your lawyer to say that Moore wrote the whole autograph is evidence of forgery or at the very least deception.
It's a fatal blow to the accuser's credibility.
It's a fatal blow to the accuser's credibility.
While you post nothing but opinion that you repeat from other sources....that is intellectual dishonesty....Like never admitting there was no such thing as .6% growth way back when you lied through your teeth.....LOL For someone with zero credibility, you sure are quick to complain of others....
Why are you still defending Moore? As mentioned, adding specifics is not forgery and doesn't make it less likely that Moore signed the yearbook.
wphamilton said...
Adding the note (which btw I suggested earlier was the case and you didn't have this objection) is not forgery. She did not forge his signature. It was not too bright, since adding anything diminishes her credibility, but it objectively has zero bearing on whether he signed her yearbook or not.
Why are you still defending Moore? As mentioned, adding specifics is not forgery and doesn't make it less likely that Moore signed the yearbook.
As mentioned, the deliberate deception in believing Moore wrote the note goes to Nelson's credibility.
It does make it less likely Moore signed it or at least signed it in the time and place Nelson would have you believed.
And it makes it far more like Nelson lied about the encounter.
Why would he sign a high school yearbook many years later?
He wouldn't. Thanks for proving my point.
If it's his signature, it's his signature.
Anything to deflect from the fact. Trump supports Moore, therefore all of his followers must take up the banner.
We've already established that there is literally nothing that Trump can do that would cost him his support, at least in this little corner of politics. I've asked directly, the answer was explicit. Apparently it transfers to whomever else Trump tells you to support as well.
What blows my mind is that they think that it's all about politics, liberal vs conservative, Republican vs Democrat. When a man is unworthy even of your respect, only a fool wants to see him as a Congressman. Or President, or a member of the President's Cabinet.
Post a Comment