(get out the popcorn)
Nobody seems particularly happy with this. Fiscal conservatives are upset that it adds more debt to the deficit. Strategic Republicans point out that a two year budget eliminates the chances next year to pass any new laws through reconciliation (which only requires 50 votes and generally is done as part of the budget process). Mainstream Democrats are upset about a major increase in military spending and some special tax breaks. The far left is livid because the Democrats allowed a budget to pass without dealing with the dreamer issue.
So basically it's a losing deal for everyone with an ulterior motive, a far left, or a far right stance.
To some degree, it's the sort of bi-partisan deal that some people claim to want. Overall the budget deal got 71 votes in the Senate, with 173 Republicans and 73 Democrats voting for it in the House. Perhaps they can piece together something similar with immigration?
98 comments:
No deal will be done because Democrats don't want a deal.
Congrats...everyone ousted added another trillion or two to the deficit....So much for blaming Obama for running up everything....There is plenty of BS to pass around...BTW as I said yesterday...this porter thingy has lots of legs and it sure appears Kelly could be imperiled....Once again, the R's are doing everything to become a unisex party.....LOL
This pretty much reflects my opinion.
Democrats’ Immigration Radicalism: The Gift That Keeps on Giving for Donald Trump
The president’s overly generous proposal on immigration, which provides an amnesty and pathway to citizenship for 1.8 million illegal aliens who were brought to America as children in exchange for ending chain migration and the diversity visa lottery and beginning to fund a border wall, was greeted with predictable howls of indignation on the left. But while Nancy Pelosi and her media enablers may see Trump’s immigration framework as “an act of staggering cowardice which attempts to hold the Dreamers hostage to a hateful anti-immigrant scheme,” it is Pelosi and her Democratic brethren who are dangerously out of touch with American public opinion.
While I personally favor a policy much tougher than the one espoused by the president, there is little doubt that Trump is correct when he notes that “the Republican position on immigration is the center mainstream view of the American people.”
So much for blaming Obama for running up everything
Obama added 10 trillion to the debt and you didn't bat an eye.
Now you're concerned?
Hypocrisy --- Bedrock --- Liberalism
Off Topic
Team USA Olympian: I Was “Dishonorably” Denied The Privilege Of Carrying The Flag Due To A Coin Toss
Now God's a racist.
Menstral the cramp like CH likes to speak for others without proof....
Obama added 10 trillion to the debt and you didn't bat an eye.
Liar....you and your kind rode Obama's ass for everything as I have always been a deficit hawk!!!!!!....now you are fawning over trump and his wild spending ways that will continue to trillion dollar a year deficits!!! Yeah you conservative hypocrite liars are in charge and running amok...See the multi million dollar parade that soldiers hate participating in. while vets cannot get the support they need....Yep, you are a joke...
Now God's a racist.
The only racist here is you.....idiot....Hot air....source for the mentally challenged.....
this porter thingy has lots of legs and it sure appears Kelly could be imperiled.
If CNN and the NY Times says so, then it must be true!
Suppose a Democratic president’s Justice Department really did use Democratic-funded opposition research, unverified and insufficiently disclosed, to get a secret warrant from the FISC to spy on a former Republican campaign adviser. Would that be perfectly okay?
If you have actually paid real attention to the way things are run in the White House by this President? And didn't automatically assume that any story about the President and his behavior, are "Fake News" you would think that Kelly's job as chief of staff for this President, you would be able to think that he's probably the next in line for unemployment benefits within two weeks, more or less.
Liar....you and your kind rode Obama's ass for everything as I have always been a deficit hawk!!!!!!.
Then by all means, please point to the post where you severely criticize Obama for blowing out the debt.
If you have actually paid real attention to the way things are run in the White House by this President?
I pay as much attention to you theories as I did the birthers.
Roger Amick said...
If you have actually paid real attention to the way things are run in the White House by this President?
have YOU???
you're the clown that wrote THIS:
"Why did the President let this man be his press secretary?"
now, this may come as a shock, especially to someone of such a self-professed towering IQ as yourself, but the president, ANY president, does not personally interview and fill every headcount slot in the white house.
Porter wasn't his press secretary he was a staff secretary.
He essentially shuffle papers for the president.
Blogger Roger Amick said...
Suppose a Democratic president’s Justice Department really did use Democratic-funded opposition research, unverified and insufficiently disclosed, to get a secret warrant from the FISC to spy on a former Republican campaign adviser. Would that be perfectly okay?
no genius, i wouldn't be. because...
"a Democratic president’s (0linsky) Justice Department (lynch) really did use Democratic-funded opposition research (fusion GPS), unverified and insufficiently disclosed (by the braintrust at our FBI), to get a secret warrant from the FISC to spy on a former Republican campaign adviser (and american citizen carter page).
"Porter wasn't his press secretary he was a staff secretary.
He essentially shuffle papers for the president."
one must always assume the mundane task of explaining the details to the alky.
this porter thingy has lots of legs and it sure appears Kelly could be imperiled....
i am absolutely certain that general kelly knows what it's like to be "imperiled" and this ain't one of those times.
Kelly's job as chief of staff for this President, you would be able to think that he's probably the next in line for unemployment benefits within two weeks, more or less.
Would that be in a landslide, Roger?
He essentially shuffled papers for the President.
The President is presented with papers that have the most important, highest secret "papers" in the country. The wife beating son of bitch could read every single one of them.
This put him into the position for bribery. And in that paper shuffling around position made him a prime candidate for bribery, with the highest level secret documents in the country.
This presents a good question. Why was he allowed in the position, despite he did not have a permanent top security clearance?
I think blackmail is the term you're looking for.
And since his ex-wives were all too ready to publicly destroy his reputation your theory doesn't hold water.
The President is presented with papers that have the most important, highest secret "papers" in the country. The wife beating son of bitch could read every single one of them.
and carlos danger could read every single one of hillary's.
your point?
Let's put it this way Scotty. It has already been reported that the President isn't happy with him.
And please, Mr. Distraction on the President's distraction, dismiss anything but Fox as Fake News, the west wing of the White House, is leaking from every single toilet, information on the President. He's not happy with the General.
My point is, that what is happening in the White House of this President. Not what some unverified claims about events that allegedly occurred four years ago.
The President is presented with papers that have the most important, highest secret "papers" in the country. The wife beating son of bitch could read every single one of them.
actually genius, you don't know this. for example...
CIA generated docs could've been presented by the CIA.FBI, DOD, and so on.
for all you know porter could've been handling formal signing documents and the morning WaPo newspaper.
all your drama queenery can't be good for the ol' blood pressure, rog. relax, before you crash your walker into something.
and while we're on the topic, you really should upgrade from a walker to a hoveround. check with loretta. i'm sure she has some buying tips to share.
Okay Rog...
I get it. Law of averages says that CNN/NYT/WaPo brain trust will get one right in the near future. Perhaps this is the one? Broken clock twice a day and all that?
David St. Hubbins: I believe virtually everything I read, and I think that is what makes me more of a selective human than someone who doesn't believe anything.
Blogger Roger Amick said...
Let's put it this way Scotty. It has already been reported that the President isn't happy with him.
was that true, or did you hear it on CNN?
truth be told alky, general kelly is the best thing to happen to trump, and trump's smart enough to know this. kelly keeps him on track and and largely away from idiotic distractions formulated by the likes of you and your fakebook club.
Reasonable people can disagree on an issue.
But only one of them knows the truth.
But only one of them knows the truth.
Like the truth that Hillary would win in a landslide?
The truth that Trump wouldn't make it a year?
The truth that the economy, markets, and everything else would crash under Trump?
How often in the liberal truth wrong, before it stops being the truth?
CH makes up another line of pure guano!!! said ...
If CNN and the NY Times says so, then it must be true!
THAT WAS MY OPINION JAGOFF!!!!!!!
Roger Amick has subscriptions to The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, The Washington Post and the Los Angeles Times. He has Dish Network, reads Breitbart, watches Faux News, Drudge report and much more.
Politics has been a part of my life, since the Kennedy Nixon debate. I'm able to write far better than this.
"truth be told alky, general kelly is the best thing to happen to trump, and trump's smart enough to know this. kelly keeps him on track and and largely away from idiotic distractions formulated by the likes of you and your fakebook club."
Five years, seven months and sixteen days.
Kelly has not been able to contain the impulsive use of Twitter.
Kelly has not been able to get the President to quit lying, or distorting comments.
Roger Amick doesn't have a Facebook club.
Roger Amick is not obsessed with this President.
I am far more concerned about the direction our government has become almost dysfunctional for a considerable period of time. I can't sit here at this moment and write about the complicated issue. But with few exceptions, this President, who has deep authorization beliefs, has been able to manipulate the country to support his dictatorial tendencies.
He's just been able to exploit our increasingly institutional malfunctions.
What worries me the most, is that he knows what he's doing.
Predictions are like gambling.
The truth is the reality of he knows what he's doing.
I explained it in my previous post, amigo.
Like the truth that Hillary would win in a landslide?
Like that at best is an opinion.....even you can discern that little detail!!! LOLOLOL,,,,
But only one of them knows the truth.
you wouldn't know the truth if it beat you in the head with your walker
But with few exceptions, this President, who has deep authorization beliefs, has been able to manipulate the country to support his dictatorial tendencies.
ok, i'll bite. please expand upon this to illustrate some examples of how his "deep authorization beliefs" have led to policy results which "support his dictatorial tendencies."
you're parroting something i hear fifty times a day from the left, but no one has ever offered some concrete examples.
how many leftists have been banished to secret prisons or gulags? how many of trump's opponents have been lined up and shot? how many have simply been disappeared, never to be seen again? how many have died via the poison tip of an umbrella, a la pooty poot's favorite method to extinguish political opponents?
you need to help us out here son. your hyperbolic rhetoric simply does not line up with trump's reality.
How often in the liberal truth wrong, before it stops being the truth?
hey, you're talking about a gang of misfits who award the nobel peace prize for absolutely no good fucking reason at all.
liberals thrive on hypocrisy. there's never any room for the truth.
There's an old saying...you don't shit where you eat!!!! Except donnie the potus leads the debauchery....What crappy way to lead a country!!!!!!
Politics
The Trump White House has been plagued by rumors of illicit romances — and now Hope Hicks is at the center
Funny how the legs keep spouting....seems Jared does not have clearance either....the law and order R's should be screaming, imagine if Obama had him on the payroll....Seems his multiple disclosure lies are impeding his FBI investigation.....What a crock of bullshit...It's like CH is running the show!!!!!! LOLOLOL
Rat the hole is listening to the wrong stations said....
you're parroting something i hear fifty times a day from the left
I'm sure you can provide who and when whatever you hear said....I doubt it...Just more shit flung on the wall of trump.....
eat a pistol d0pie.
Roger -
The problem with "the truth" is when it becomes opinion.
Objectively, Obama's Presidency started off with a stimulus law, and Obamacare. After that, there was literally nothing of substance accomplished for about seven years. Nearly everything done by Executive Order has been overturned, the stimulus was a massive failure, and several portions of Obamacare are no longer in place. Terrorism increased under his watch. Race relations suffered. Crime increased. Poverty increased. Welfare increased.
Eight years, and Obama accomplishments are down to "part" of one law. The objective measurements were below average at best. He wasn't even able to get his heir apparent elected to replace him.
Objectively.. why would anyone consider this to be a well run Administration? Is it because Obama didn't tweet, and CNN/NYT/WaPo was not continuously reporting stories of "dysfunction"?
The truth as it would relate directly to the facts... would be judged on accomplishment. The goal of any leader (President, CEO, Administrator) is to get things done. Period.
That's the truth Roger.
CH forgot to mention an important fact
Objectively, Obama's Presidency started off with a stimulus law, and Obamacare
Wrong mutton breath....His presidency started in a massive recession that was shedding hundreds of thousand jobs a month.. How quickly the simple minds forget......That is a truth you choose to ignore, nothing new there.....LOL
Awesome Rat the hole again shits his limited brain with a trump like insult....
eat a pistol d0pie.
Such a massive intellect!!!!!!!! I'm impressed!
His presidency started in a massive recession that was shedding hundreds of thousand jobs a month.
And he led us through the slowest economic recoveries following a recession in modern history... and had us all believing that 1-2 percent growth was the "new normal".
The reality, Opie... is that we have recessions and we come out of them. We'eve had five since 1980. We are probably due for another in the next few years. None of those recessions lasted through eight years of a Presidency.
You want to give Obama credit for what exactly? Being elected "while" we were in a recession? You could have elected Charlie Brown as President, and we still would have come out of the recession. That's not an accomplishment.
I'm sure you can provide who and when whatever you hear said...
turn on CNN or MSDNC, fuckstick. that shit runs on an endless loop 24/7/365.
Am I the only one who isn't all that concerned about a bipartisan budget that might avoid the fiscal brinkmanship for two years?
Granted, my master-plan envisioned Republicans gaining control this past election and imposing some fiscal discipline, and overt pandering to the wealthy and powerful skewered that. I'll admit I didn't expect the GOP to be that blatant about it, and then tack on a budget busting military increase on top. But as long as the economy is growing and we're able to finance the debt, it's not an urgent issue.
It would be ironic if the Democrats see a resurgence and it falls on them to restrain the deficit.
Rat the hole gets caught again BSing his way through life like donnie.....
turn on CNN or MSDNC, fuckstick. that shit runs on an endless loop
IOW's I don't have a clue of whom or what they said ,,, Normal rat logic....LOLOLOLO
And he led us through the slowest economic recoveries following a recession in modern history... and had us all believing that 1-2 percent growth was the "new normal".
Meh. Check out this chart https://www.statista.com/statistics/188185/percent-chance-from-preceding-period-in-real-gdp-in-the-us/ inflation-adjusted GDP.
You don't yet have any real bragging rights about growth under Trump vs under Obama.
Am I the only one who isn't all that concerned about a bipartisan budget that might avoid the fiscal brinkmanship for two years?
Nope.
And he led us through the slowest economic recoveries following
LOLOLOL.....Seems that pulling the country from a recession, adding millions of jobs and leaving a growing economy is not good enough for a loser like you.....Once again your biased opinion is noted and will be put in its proper place for losing tenets...
When was the last time 70 R house members support anything of importance when Obama was in the WH??????
Munchkin,
Do you have any reason for existing, other than coming here to troll? who gets your fatass out of bed. What a pathetic "life"
Am I the only one who isn't all that concerned about a bipartisan budget that might avoid the fiscal brinkmanship for two years?
How I stop worrying and learned to love the debt.
You don't yet have any real bragging rights about growth under Trump vs under Obama.
i don't know anyone who's looking for bragging rights. i know a lot of people who are hopeful for a better economy, not a "new normal" of paltry "growth."
credit trump or not - it's irrelevant. american business and the american consumer drive the economy, and the truth is that with trump in office they're feeling a confidence that didn't exist under 8 years of BHO. so let the people have their fantasy. as long as the economy continues to grow after a very long lost decade, i don't really care.
LOLOLOL.....Seems that pulling the country from a recession
If Barack Obama did nothing his first year but played golf we would have been completely out of recession and totally recovered.
Unfortunately, he did something.
i don't know anyone who's looking for bragging rights.
ahem ... "Trump"
credit trump or not - it's irrelevant.
It's relevant to Trump, and to CH and others on this blog when they brag about economic growth under Trump. 2.6%? Not enough by a long-shot, not for a "delayed recovery".
Granted, my master-plan envisioned Republicans gaining control this past election and imposing some fiscal discipline, and overt pandering to the wealthy and powerful skewered that.
now that's clever. truth be told, if the GOP had a super-majority in the senate and decided to get serious about fiscal discipline, the first thing on the chopping block would be the entitlements which consume two thirds of our federal budget. watch the reaction across the nation whan THAT ox begins to get gored.
as long as the economy continues to grow after a very long lost decade, i don't really care.
Even if it's not really growing more than in "the lost years", you're really OK with that?
Unfortunately, he did something.
and fortunately trump undid that something.
btw, did you hear that the IPAB met its end with the budget deal? that went largely unreported.
death to the death panel. quite fitting.
Even if it's not really growing more than in "the lost years", you're really OK with that?
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
'sigh.'
i'm expecting much more than BHO's 0.7% growth.
now that's clever. truth be told, if the GOP had a super-majority in the senate and decided to get serious about fiscal discipline
Clearly they aren't "serious" about it. A majority in both chambers, the Presidency, and all this judges Trump has appointed to the courts, and that's still not enough to "get serious" about it.
When the Democrats get a foothold again, maybe then there will be some serious action on the budget.
wp shredded you later. He is merciless and it's the truth.
Dysfunction. You have again assuming that I cannot have an original thought.
Considering that you have been following the strategy of distraction by Trump supporters like Fox News, you are in denial of the dysfunctional President by bringing up Clinton over and over again and again.
You obviously have been following orders, unknowingly.
That's how a dictatorship works. They convince intelligent people unknowingly into line.
Let's see, GDP growth was 2.5%, 1.6%, 2.2, 1.7, 2.4, 2.6, and 1.9% in 2010 through 2016 respectively.
but hey, use "alternate facts" if it helps the narrative.
I'd like to see growth under Trump at least reach the historical average of 3%. Or do we have a "new new normal" that applies to Trump, and as long as you can imagine "confidence" then the below-average "new new" is fine?
He is merciless and it's the truth.
I am not merciless, I ease up all the time. Maybe I should soften up a bit.
Rat the fucking asshole opined incorrectly that....
i'm expecting much more than BHO's 0.7% growth.
http://money.cnn.com/gallery/news/economy/2017/01/06/obama-economy-10-charts-final/3.html.
Take out the first year asshole and tell me what the Obama GDP is.....It ain't .7% like you claim....Dumbass
When in doubt, just make shit up.....the rat hole way.!!!!! Just like the heard it all over and could not come up with a single name or place...the idiocy continues....
Clearly they aren't "serious" about it. A majority in both chambers, the Presidency, and all this judges Trump has appointed to the courts, and that's still not enough to "get serious" about it.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
well wp, you either somehow get to 60 votes in the senate or you nuke it and start doing everything with a simple majority. that's what it will take to get serious about it.
entitlements are the problem. we all know it, yet no one will address it. and if you think democrats possess the capacity for serious fiscal discipline you're more delusional than roger.
When the Democrats get a foothold again, maybe then there will be some serious action on the budget.
Do you really think they will tackle entitlements? No, their solution is the levy burdensome taxes and crash goes the economy.
Keynesian economics is an economic theory of total spending in the economy and its effects on output and inflation. Keynesian economics was developed by the British economist John Maynard Keynes during the 1930s in an attempt to understand the Great Depression.".
This bi partisan agreement is horrible.
The National Bureau of Economic research dates the beginnings of the economic recession at December 2007. By 2009, the country’s GDP finally began to improve again, reaching almost 15 trillion U.S. dollars in 2010. In 2010, after the end of the recession, the global GDP increased by 5.38 percent. From 2019 to 2020, global GDP is expected to increase by 3.97 percent.
Blogger Roger Amick said...
wp shredded you later. He is merciless and it's the truth.
and there's the sum total of your value around here alky - as wp's pom pom girl.
whether or not wp has "shredded" anyone is debatable.
what's not debatable is your capacity to do so. your singular skill is the art of copy/paste. other than that you got nothing.
Keynesian economics is an economic theory of total spending in the economy and its effects on output and inflation. Keynesian economics was developed by the British economist John Maynard Keynes during the 1930s in an attempt to understand the Great Depression.".
This bi partisan agreement is horrible.
Like the truth that Hillary would win in a landslide?
The truth that Trump wouldn't make it a year?
The truth that the economy, markets, and everything else would crash under Trump?
How often in the liberal truth wrong, before it stops being the truth?"
I see roger, grabbed his walker and retreated.
Roger is so stupid.
include your link and show your work, al-kee...
http://forum2.aimoo.com/FSA/Political-Discussion/RE-Wow-A-new-low-in-popularity-1-1355601.html
"The National Bureau of Economic research dates the beginnings of the economic recession at December 2007. By 2009, the country's GDP finally began to improve again, reaching almost 15 trillion U.S. dollars in 2010. In 2010, after the end of the recession, the global GDP increased by 5.38 percent. From 2019 to 2020, ..."
Limbaugh blame Obama" HB
Post Limbaugh qoute, surely you have it cut n pasted, so show it.
LOL no, it's fun. He's just a bit arrogant. Popping the bubble is fun.
Menstral the cramp forgets his retirement income is completely tied to SS....
I hope he his ready to eat dog food.....since he likes voting against his best interests....LOL!!!
The economy lost jobs every month of 2009, albeit at a steadily slowing rate. The economy gained jobs every month after February of 2010. Including 2009, the United States has added an average of 127,824 jobs per month during Obama's presidency, which places him fifth for job creation since FDR. However, excluding 2009, the average would be 191,747 per month, which would rank him second, and from 2011 to the present, we have averaged 207,429 per month, which would place President Obama just behind President Clinton for first place.
include your link and show your work, al-kee.."
He steals other people's work and money.
http://politicsthatwork.com/economic-record-president/obama
K'putz, you would better off if you quit making a shithole of yourself.
Again
http://politicsthatwork.com/economic-record-president/obama
I hope he his ready to eat dog food.....since he likes voting against his best interests....LOL!!!
More like lamb on my next Caribbean cruise. But thanks for being so concerned.
Alky making the Case that today"s economy is Still Obama's.
Roger. I was hoping you were kidding, your not, but you are kidding yourself.
Obama added 12.5 Trillion in 8 years. Do not forget the 2.5 Trillion over at Federal Reserve.
"GDP growth was below-average during Obama's presidency."
Roger's link.
"The median income grew at a slightly slower pace during Obama's presidency than it has historically."
From Roger's Link.
Politics That Work's content has been cited by the New York Times, Salon, Marketwatch and Truth Out and has been published on the Huffington Post, Talking Points Memo, PoliticusUSA, Angry Bear and others.
LOL.
"Debt as a percent of US GDP
President Obama has the second-worst record on the debt since 1953."
From Roger"s Link
“We have so much to discuss u need to be careful but we can help our country,” Warner wrote to Waldman on March 22.
“I’m in,” he replied.
Other messages suggested that Warner sought to keep other members of the Senate Intelligence Committee in the dark about the back channel to Steele.
“Ok but I wud (sic) like to do prelim call u me and him no one else before letter just so we have to trail to start want to discuss scope first before letter no leaks,” he wrote.
And on March 30, he texted: “We want to do this right private in London don’t want to send letter yet cuz if we can’t get agreement wud rather not have paper trail.”
- Mark Warner, Russian Agent, VA.
http://dailycaller.com/2018/02/09/steele-mark-warner-back-channel/
Damn Roger slithered off
I was not done quoting from his Link.
"Debt as a percent of US GDP
President Obama has the second-worst record on the debt since 1953."
From Roger"s Link
"The median income grew at a slightly slower pace during Obama's presidency than it has historically."
From Roger's Link.
When was the last time 70 R house members support anything of importance when Obama was in the WH??????
Apparently Obama wasn't a very good negotiator or someone who could bring the Parties together. Maybe he should have read the book "Art of the deal".
Roger why did you slither off?
I was not done posting from "your link".
Apparently Obama wasn't a very good negotiator or someone who could bring the Parties together.
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
the sum total of 0linsky's negotiations with the GOP:
"the election's over. I WON."
Menstral the cramp who works for food claims
More like lamb on my next Caribbean cruise. But thanks for being so concerned.
Yeah sure....a dingy, six pack, and a miami canal is not a carribean cruise.....LOLOLOLOL
Too funny...maybe you can bone up on science,
CH has no clue posts.....
pparently Obama wasn't a very good negotiator
Yeah....as he ignored his daily briefing and watched TV....he hasn't been seen on the hill.....Yeah....you have both houses in the palm of your hand and a recalcitrant group of R's.....you tossed in enough budget breakers including 4 years of CHIPS and trillion dollar debt for the foreseeable future and call it negotiations....What happened to the day where the right was annoyed at funding NPR???? You really are most amusing if you think trump drove a deal as another DOJ big wig quits and donnie fiddles away....He really has you buffaloed CH, but it makes you happy....LOLOLOL
the sum total of 0linsky's negotiations with the GOP:
Yep, the right who refused to accept the POTUS as even being born in th USA did everything they could to bring him down. How many times did the house vote to repeal Obama care???? That alone should be evidence of the impediment you righties exhibited...What did McConnell say about being a 1 termer.....you really are a joke rat hole, but like tweedle dee CH, you put on your tin foil hate and transport yourself to trump land....the land of the lies and being tossed under the bus...Whatta guy!!!!!!
Yeah sure....a dingy, six pack, and a miami canal is not a caribbean cruise.....LOLOLOLOL
Well if you think I live on a Miami canal than it's a cigarette boat rather than a dingy.
But I'll take the six pack. ☺
Obama added 12.5 trillion in 8 years.
So if Trump does 1 trillion a year, he comes in 4.5 trillion under that of the lost years.
Post a Comment