Sunday, June 24, 2018

Sunday Open Mic !!!


57 comments:

Loretta said...

NORTH KOREA REMOVING ANTI-AMERICAN PROPAGANDA ALL ACROSS THE COUNTRY


Decades-old anti-U.S. propaganda murals are being painted over and displays promising “merciless revenge” on the “rotten, diseased, pirate nation” of America are being torn down. It’s the latest sign of a thaw in North Korea‘s relationship with the U.S.

One tour manager said he’s never seen anything like it. “All the anti-American posters I usually see around Kim Il-sung Square and at shops, they’ve all just gone,” he told Reuters.

The North Korean government is erasing much of its anti-U.S. propaganda following dictator Kim Jong-un’s Summit with President Trump earlier this month, replacing it with messages touting a “lasting peace” and prospects for Korean reunification.

• Murals, banners and posters depicting the U.S. as a brutal, imperialist aggressor hell-bent on destroying North Korean and enslaving its citizens are gone.

• Postcards and stamps showing North Korean missiles on their way to Washington are no longer being sold.

• Anti-American trinkets have been removed from souvenir stores.

• News reports that once depicted the U.S. as hostile imperialists have ceased.

• The country’s main state-run newspaper hasn’t featured a direct attack on Trump since March, when he agreed to meet with Kim, and is no longer reporting anti-U.S. news.

In place of the aggressive rhetoric, there is now a focus on more positive messages:

• Items showing themes of Korean reunification fill the stores.

• Posters pushing economic progress and the inter-Korean rapprochement have gone up.

• Murals depicting the Panmunjom Declaration signed at the inter-Korean summit are now seen in Pyongyang’s central square.

• The papers are filled with pictures of the Trump and Kim’s summit.

“In tone, the US is now depicted as if it is a normal country,” explains Peter Ward, North Korea expert. “All references to US actions that North Korea considers hostile have disappeared.” There's even what Ward describes as “neutral” coverage of the US quitting the UN human rights council.

“This is fascinating,” Ward told the BBC. “Generally speaking, neutral or positive coverage is normally reserved for countries that Pyongyang has friendly relations with.”


https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-44557818

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-northkorea-usa-gifts/north-korea-scraps-anti-american-souvenirs-after-summit-tour-operators-say-idUSKBN1JG0XB
https://www.nknews.org/2018/06/new-north-korean-propaganda-posters-promote-april-27-panmunjom-declaration/

A start in the right direction.

The traitorous war mongers weep.

Anonymous said...

Really Good start.

Did we send them $$$$ Billions to do it?

213 US Servicemen remains returned.

Anonymous said...

David Hogg has Armed Guards.

Oh well.

commie said...

Blogger KD said...
David Hogg has Armed Guards.

And you remain an unadulterated scum bag!!!!!!

commie said...


Did we send them $$$$ Billions to do it?

And how many billions and lives did Iraq cost......60 years later we get remains.....holy cow...the No Ko's really gave up what??? Idiots,both of you.....

Anonymous said...

The Times Mag is a gift to conseratives.
Anyone at all still believe the US Press is Unbias.

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

Obamacare premiums are once again poised to spike by double digits in 2019, causing heartburn for politicians as voters will head to the polls within days of learning about the looming hit to their pocketbooks.

But unlike recent campaign cycles, when Republicans capitalized on Obamacare sticker shock to help propel them to complete control of Congress and the White House, they’re now likely to be the ones feeling the wrath of voters.

commie said...

To a subject right wing assholes deny.....seems to me those old models damn well predicted the growing temps....Oh well, our host will argue whether a year was warmest because of satirical significance....a fools argument..

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/23/opinion/sunday/james-e-hansen-climate-global-warming.html?action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=opinion-c-col-left-region&region=opinion-c-col-left-region&WT.nav=opinion-c-col-left-region

The question defies a simple answer. In 1988, Dr. Hansen had to offer a prognostication not just about how the Earth would respond to greenhouse gases, but also about how much of those gases humans would choose to inject into the air.
EDITORS’ PICKS


He did what any cautious forecaster would do: He offered low, medium and high scenarios. The warming over the past 30 years has indeed fallen well within his upper and lower bounds.

One of Dr. Hansen’s scenarios, Scenario B, has turned out to be a reasonably close match for fossil-fuel emissions as they actually occurred. Yet we now know Scenario B predicted too much global warming, by something like 30 percent.

Two reasons for that stand out. One is that Dr. Hansen had assumed a continued increase in certain refrigerant gases that warm the climate. Those gases were ultimately brought under control by a global treaty, the Montreal Protocol — proof that scientific warnings, if taken seriously, can be acted upon at a worldwide scale.

The bigger problem was that the computers he was using in the 1980s could not operate fast enough to give a realistic picture of the upper atmosphere; as a result, his model was most likely overestimating the Earth’s sensitivity to emissions. In the years since, computer modeling of the climate, though hardly perfect, has improved.

So while his temperature forecast was not flawless, in a larger sense, Dr. Hansen’s 1988 warning has turned out to be entirely on target. As emissions have soared, the planet has warmed relentlessly, just as he said it would; 1988 is not even in the top 20 warmest years now. Every year of this century has been hotter.

The ocean is rising, as Dr. Hansen predicted, and the pace seems to be accelerating. The great ice sheets in Greenland and Antarctica are dumping ever-rising volumes of water into the sea. Coastal flooding is increasing rapidly in the United States. The Arctic Ocean ice cap has shrunk drastically.
ADVERTISEMENT

If his warning in 1988 had been met with a national policy to reduce emissions, other countries might have followed, and the world would be in much better shape.

But within a few years after he raised the alarm, fossil-fuel interests and libertarian ideologues began financing a campaign of lies about climate research. The issue bogged down in Congress, and to this day that body has taken no action remotely commensurate with the threat.

Dr. Hansen retired from NASA in 2013, but at age 77, he feels his work is not done. Today, from an office at Columbia University, he spends his time fighting the government he once served. He is an expert witness for a lawsuit that young people have filed in Oregon against the federal government, contending that its failure to tackle climate change is a threat to their constitutional rights of life and liberty.

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

Most Republicans still believe that Obama was born in Kenya and he is a Muslim.

ColdheartedPravda.blogspot.com is in full swing!

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

It's a Communists scam!

commie said...

KD said...
The Times Mag is a gift to conservatives.

And your moronic guano is a gift to any liberal voter!!! More people were exposed to the Time cover than fake news faux....

Anonymous said...

The Time Mag gift. Keeps on giving with ones like on this blog.

Alky :"Obamacare premiums are once again poised to spike by double digits in 2019."

Do you see your error?

Anonymous said...

In civil debate, when one uses "and" they had agreed and conceded the point made.

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

they’re now likely to be the ones feeling the wrath of voters.

Anonymous said...

Says you. Obamacare. Here alky let me help ya.
Your error, in your own words.
Obamacare premiums are once again poised to spike by double digits in 2019"

Once again, that has been to trend since your team passed it.

Anonymous said...

Top Two Issues 2018
"economy is the biggest issue in the 2018 midterm elections: Poll

by Katelyn Caralle
| May 03, 2018 12:15 PM
The most important issue to most Americans for the 2018 midterm elections is the economy, according to a Thursday Morning Consult report.

Overall, 27 percent of voters feel the economy is the biggest policy issue facing them as they go into the voting booths.

According to Morning Consult, both Democrats and independents have economic issues as their top priority for the midterms, while it comes in second for Republicans after security issues."

Commonsense said...

I’m a Twitter pariah now. I said I didn’t care about soccer.

C.H. Truth said...

Funny how the left now wants to use the utter failure of their "signature achievement" to place blame on their political opponents for the mess.

Since Obamacare is the last real refuge for anything Obama legacy related, I guess it's fair to say that even Democrats can now admit that the eight years of Obama was a dismal exercise in partisan futility.

Apparently the only thing Obama is good for is the ability to blame his failures on Republicans for politics sake!!!

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

Breaking News Reporter
Katelyn Caralle is a breaking news reporter for the Washington Examiner. She previously worked as a media analyst for the Washington Free Beacon. Katelyn first came to Washington, D.C., as an intern for the Heritage Foundation in 2016.

Fake News Reports for kput'z sake

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

The Trump administration has intentionally denied access to many health care providers and has taken away the penalty that got millions more people to enroll to increase the costs per patient by thousands.

He insulted the real war hero McCain in his campaign speech in Las Vegas yesterday.

Your hero is a heartless hypocrite as are you.

Loretta said...

"while it comes in second for Republicans after security issues"

Someone has to be the adult.

Loretta said...

For the traitorous war monger

"Americans tend to vote first and foremost on the economy — except this year, Republicans have a different top priority: national security"

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.vox.com/platform/amp/2018/5/3/17314664/2018-midterm-polls-policy-priority-voters

VOX.com

Loretta said...

"He insulted the real war hero McCain in his campaign speech in Las Vegas yesterday."

LOL.

Anonymous said...




Apparently the only thing Obama is good for is the ability to blame his failures on Republicans for politics sake!!!


now that you mention it, 0linsky couldn't go five minutes in his first term without blaming something on bush. he was constantly complaining about something he inherited. in contrast i don't think i've heard trump mention mention skeets by name more than a couple times as he proceeded to take a fucking flamethrower to his marxist legacy.

Anonymous said...



He insulted the real war hero McCain in his campaign speech in Las Vegas yesterday.

he did?

good.

can you imagine if mcpappy had never been shot down and captured? he'd be selling insurance in asscrack arizona and we never would have heard of him.

his war hero status is as stale as your first liver, alky.


Loretta said...

There is no surer sign the left are losing the debate than Kristjen Neilson being forced to leave a Mexican restaurant, Sarah Sanders being ask to leave a restaurant run by a communist in VA, and FL AG Pam Bondi being driven out of a movie theater.

Please keep it up. This is the best campaigning Trump could hope for.

Anonymous said...

Blogger Roger Amick said...
It's not hatred of the President.

Our Democratic Republic has been in existence since 1776. This President is the biggest threat to our Democratic Republic in history.



uh, no it hasn't, alky.

and for clarification, please define the threat trump poses to our representative, not democratic, republic. i've seen you toss this bullshit out there countless times while never adding the data to back it up.



Anonymous said...



Please keep it up. This is the best campaigning Trump could hope for.

precisely. i think it's ironic that trump could very well ride a liberal temper tantrum to reelection victory. and if he does, then THAT'S when the guns get drawn.

Anonymous said...




trump is reuniting families after all:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5877195/Migrants-tried-enter-United-States-illegally-arrive-Guatemala-Honduras.html#article-5877195

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

You would be a member of the John Birch Society.

William F. Buckley Jr. Pushed the Republican party into a true conservative party without the hate-filled rhetoric and racism.

People like you have been turning it into a white supremacist party.

Anonymous said...




it's funny that you occasionally invoke buckley while despising everything the man stood for.

you're a fraud, alky.

now tell us why trump is a threat to our 'democratic republic', whatever the fuck that is.

commie said...

KD the moronic asshole poses....

In civil debate, when one uses "and


Dayum, you are a funny old asshole with out a clue!!!!! Find a job yet...

commie said...


trump is reuniting families after all:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article

Funny the only reporting of that comes from an overseas tabloid!!!!....rat hole misses the irony of his own stupidity....LOL

commie said...

i think it's ironic that trump could very well ride a liberal temper tantrum to reelection victory.

And I think its possible trump will overplay his hand with idiots like you who are a dying breed and loose more george will and steve shcmidt types!!!!

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

He's flirting with impeachment

Reuters) - President Donald Trump said on Sunday that people who enter the United States illegally should be sent back immediately to where they came from without any judicial process, likening them to invaders who are trying to "break into" the country.

His proposal drew immediate criticism from legal analysts and immigrant rights advocates who said it would violate the U.S. Constitution's due process provision, which applies to citizens and non-citizens alike.

In a series of tweets on Sunday, Trump said: "We cannot allow all of these people to invade our Country. When somebody comes in, we must immediately, with no Judges or Court Cases, bring them back from where they came.

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

The data to back it up.

I can pardon myself.

I can tell the FBI and Department of justice to prosecute anyone I want them to do.

The President cannot do anything illegal.

If President Hillary Rodham Clinton had declared herself above the law and put Trump in jail you would be nuclear.

Jimmy you are the biggest hypocrite here and that's a hell of a big mountain to climb.

Anonymous said...

"while it comes in second for Republicans after security issues"

Someone has to be the adult."

Obama a historic bed wetter.

Anonymous said...

now tell us why trump is a threat to our 'democratic republic', whatever the fuck that is." RRB

Yep, alky our opium addicted historian.

Anonymous said...

Maxipad calls for open public lawlessness against Every Republican.

Keep this idiot talking.

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

Another assault on the Constitution.

Trump advocates depriving undocumented immigrants of due-process rights

President Trump on Sunday explicitly advocated depriving undocumented immigrants of their due-process rights, arguing that people who cross the border into the United States illegally must immediately be deported without trial.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/powerpost/trump-advocates-depriving-undocumented-immigrants-of-due-process-rights/2018/06/24/dfa45d36-77bd-11e8-93cc-6d3beccdd7a3_story.html?utm_term=.1cfb732571ef

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Zadvydas vs. Davis (2001) that "once an alien enters the country, the legal circumstance changes, for the due process clause applies to all persons within the United States."


Held:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/99-7791.ZS.html
1. Section 2241 habeas proceedings are available as a forum for statutory and constitutional challenges to post-removal-period detention. Statutory changes in the immigration law left habeas untouched as the basic method for obtaining review of continued custody after a deportation order becomes final, and none of the statutory provisions limiting judicial review of removal decisions applies here. Pp. 6—8.

2. The post-removal-period detention statute, read in light of the Constitution’s demands, implicitly limits an alien’s detention to a period reasonably necessary to bring about that alien’s removal from the United States, and does not permit indefinite detention. Pp. 8—19.

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

the immigration law left habeas untouched as the basic method for obtaining review of continued custody after a deportation order becomes final, and none of the statutory provisions limiting judicial review of removal decisions applies here.

A non layer or layman can see that he has the right to go through a hearing prior to being deported .

The President as usual, doesn't have a fucking clue.

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

The American Civil Liberties Union quickly released a statement condemning the proposal soon after Trump tweeted.

“What President Trump has suggested here is both illegal and unconstitutional. Any official who has sworn an oath to uphold the Constitution and laws should disavow it unequivocally,” Omar Jadwat, director of the ACLU’s Immigrants’ Rights Project said.

Sen. Lindsay Graham, R-South Carolina, and Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, have both said more judges are needed along the border to handle the influx of immigrants and cases as a result of the “zero tolerance” policy. Last week, Cruz introduced legislation that would help handle asylum claims at the border by doubling the number of federal immigration judges to 750.

The legislation also calls for the creation of more shelters to house families together.

Still, Trump has rejected calls for additional immigration judges at the border, instead calling for strong security and a border wall.

"We are the only people, people walk in and put a foot in, 'Please, would you like to register?' Other countries say get the hell out of here. They do that. They have to do that. We say, you know, they want to hire 5,000 more judges so that a person puts the toe in the land we have to go to trial,” Trump said in Las Vegas.“This is crazy what we are doing. I don't want judges, I want border patrol, I want ICE.”

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/trump-undocumented-immigrants-immediately-return-due-process/story?id=56128357

Anonymous said...

The most merciful thing that a large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it." Margaret Sanger

C.H. Truth said...

His proposal drew immediate criticism from legal analysts and immigrant rights advocates who said it would violate the U.S. Constitution's due process provision, which applies to citizens and non-citizens alike.

So legal analysts suggests that the President cannot deport people who are caught illegally crossing the border? I would be very curious to see the "new reasoning" that deportation is now unconstitutional (again, simply because Trump is President)

You do realize that the Supreme Court ruled unanimously that Obama had violated the constitution on more than a dozen different occasions.

How many times did you you suggest he should be impeached for his unconstitutional actions?

Anonymous said...

Roger leave the doors of his home open, never locked allowing any one in to take what ever they want to take of his.

I should post his and OPies home address on Illegal imigrant liberal Web sites as "safe Harbor" homes.

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

I can pardon myself.

I can tell the FBI and Department of justice to prosecute anyone I want them to do.

The President cannot do anything illegal.

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

You are not arguing that his claim that he can deport anyone who crossed the border illegally.

I cited the law, and you didn't argue that he's right to make such a call.

He's been lying since day one Scott. You know it's not just the Fake News stating that, but you don't fucking care. You have lost any objectivity in your dislike for the Democrats.

George Will said it best. It's better to have a majority of "deplorable" Democrats in the house, rather than the Republicans have forgotten the separation of powers. He's violating the separation of powers daily. .

Anonymous said...

Roger leave the doors of his home open, never locked allowing any one in to take what ever they want to take of his.

I should post his and OPies home address on Illegal imigrant liberal Web sites as "safe Harbor" homes.

Commonsense said...

Due process may not require courts or a judge. A simple admimstrative hearing will do. After all, you are not depriving these people of life or liberty just the privalage of staying in this country.

Anonymous said...

Jun 24, 2018 // 3:04pm
As seen on Fox & Friends Weekend
The vice president of a National Border Patrol Council union disputed a California congresswoman's claims that children in a border detention facility were being treated like criminals, as backlash toward the Trump administration's "zero tolerance" policy continues.

Rep. Jackie Speier (D) on Saturday called the Border Patrol a "criminal law enforcement agency" and compared the detention facility she visited to a prison.

Chris Cabrera, the union official, said Speier's remarks were "disgusting."

"Nothing could be farther from the truth," he said on "Fox & Friends."

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

George Will

Ryan and S. Scott and many other Republicans have become the president’s poodles, not because James Madison’s system has failed but because today’s abject careerists have failed to be worthy of it. As explained in Federalist 51: “Ambition must be made to counteract ambition. The interest of the man must be connected with the constitutional rights of the place.” Congressional Republicans (congressional Democrats are equally supine toward Democratic presidents) have no higher ambition than to placate this president. By leaving dormant the powers inherent in their institution, they vitiate the Constitution’s vital principle: the separation of powers.

Anonymous said...



A non layer or layman can see that he has the right to go through a hearing prior to being deported .


no shit, genius.

and that hearing can last 5 minutes. you make it sound like this is some long, drawn out process. if the bean jumped the fence then that's that. here illegally? get the fuck out. and the next time you do it it's a felony. just like the mother of that kid on the cover of time. she's a repeat offender, and a felon as a result.

look asshole, we get the fact that you clowns are absolutely panicked and desperate for votes. we're just not going to let you import them en masse`.

commie said...

The exit from the right is accelerating....the sycophants here will claim these people are losers and D's anyway....me thinks otherwise....tthe party of trump is disintegrating right in front of us!!!!


https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/24/opinion/abortion-rights-republican-party-women.html?action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=opinion-c-col-left-region&region=opinion-c-col-left-region&WT.nav=opinion-c-col-left-region&login=email&auth=login-email


Lifelong Republicans were booed out of state and local committee meetings for just raising abortion rights and family planning ideas. The nastiness escalated to personal attacks on men and women who had dedicated countless hours and dollars to the party.

We don’t have the space to outline President Trump’s transgressions, but it is important to understand that his rise is an inevitable result of the hostility to women within the Republican culture. Women’s reproductive freedom has shifted with the wind: Remember that Ronald Reagan once supported abortion rights, as did George H. W. Bush, Mitt Romney and Mr. Trump himself.

We can no longer support a Republican Party that is shutting down low-cost health care clinics offering cancer screenings, basic health services and much-needed family planning services. It has become a party that wants to punish pregnant women by limiting their economic choices, that wants to reduce access to sex education programs that prevent unintended pregnancy and disease.

It is no wonder that women are voting with their feet. According to a recent analysis by the Pew Research Center, 56 percent of women identify as or lean toward Democrats. The gap is even wider among college graduates and minority voters. The party should take note that 70 percent of millennial women have either registered as Democrats or lean Democratic. We will no longer be available to help the Republicans appeal to these changing demographic realities.

For years we have debated whether to close our doors. Our founding principle had been that proponents of abortion rights should be comfortable in both major parties. But we have to face reality: There probably will not be a single pro-choice Republican member of the House after the fall election, and only two in the Senate — Ms. Collins and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska.

commie said...

and that hearing can last 5 minutes.

In idiot rat hole world, that little bit of due process should be eliminated!!!!! Wow!!!!

Anonymous said...



i'm all for due process, d0pie. though i must admit i'm puzzled as to why a foreign invader would be entitled to it.

this is a binary issue that the left would love to over-complicate.

here legally? welcome to america.

here illegally? get the fuck out.

there's your due process in a fucking nutshell.