Apparently Flake votes "yes" but thinks there should be a "one week FBI investigation" into Kavanaugh's sexual harassment allegations.
Now the ball is squarely in McConnell's court. Obviously McConnell nor Flake have authority to order the FBI to do an investigation. They would require the White House to step in on that one.
What would be the point of a "one week investigation" by the FBI? What could the FBI do in one week that the Judicial committee "could not" do in several months?
The answer, of course, is to delay the vote for another week without providing anything new.
Meanwhile at least two Democrats (Manchin and Heitkamp) are wavering and said to be leaning towards a "yes" vote. A recent poll shows Manchin winning by 12 if he votes "for" Kavanaugh, but slightly behind if he votes "no". He's in a very tough spot.
Something tells me that a "compromise" is brewing with some of these undecided moderates. Let them say there was an FBI investigation (which would not conclude "anything" new) and then it provides them cover to vote "yes".
Will Trump and McConnell go for it, or will they call down the bet?
_______
UPDATE: Perhaps Flake inadvertently did the GOP a favor here. Already there are Democrats coming out and rejecting the one week timeline as arbitrary and ineffectual. Of course a one week investigation is silly and will not accomplish anything. But neither would a one month investigation or any other investigation.
The committee had plenty of time to investigate. They choose not to.
By rejecting the Flake offer, it would seem politically that the Democrats won't take yes for an answer.
Perhaps the White House and McConnell would be smart to order it to start tomorrow and schedule the vote in eight days.
184 comments:
Now you know why conservatives hate Flake.
Democracy happens. A vote for Kavanaugh will be more justified.
Got any objections to that?
He supports up to a week for more fbi work, acknowledging that it could be only s few days.
But it's up to McConnell.
Flake got played.
Democrats get what they want.
Ch Truth:
So what "conceivably" happens when a week goes by and the FBI has literally done nothing more than gather the same general statements that are already in place?
James:
When or rather IF that happens, you and Kavanaugh and all Republicans should be delighted to point out that democracy was served by not rushing to the final vote before such an investigation has taken place.
But you and Kavanaugh other Republicans and seem scared to death of what further FBI investigation will reveal.
The Republicans can now say "a woman came bravely forward and we really listened and considered her allegations."
So stupid old man was the FBI incompetent when the prior 6 background checks revealed nothing?
James said...
Those investigations, highly intelligent Cliphrate, took place before the latest allegations were known.
finally figure out the right thread. Stupid ass old man.
They were background checks, 6 of them, you fucking idiot
Cowardly Ch Truth changed his thread opening. He didn't like the way I answered his original working, as follows:
_________________________________________
Ch Truth:
So what "conceivably" happens when a week goes by and the FBI has literally done nothing more than gather the same general statements that are already in place?
James:
When or rather IF that happens, you and Kavanaugh and all Republicans should be delighted to point out that democracy was served by not rushing to the final vote before such an investigation has taken place.
But you and Kavanaugh other Republicans and seem scared to death of what further FBI investigation will reveal.
Try to THINK Calousy. Those checks took place BEFORE the latest allegations.
Stupid but not before the alleged incident occurred 6 of them, none found this so I will ask again but i understand you are too fucking stupid to get this.
Was the FBI incompetent because after 6 background checks they didn't find this?
You should be celebrating that fact that the GOP decided they'd better respond reasonably to a nation crying out, Why not have the FBI further investigate, if there is nothing to hide?
Even if you are correct, why fear investigations specifically focused on the latest allegations?
I dont think anyone is scared. They are just being realistic . The FBI can't do anything in a week. Why would anyone think that would matter" What would be the point?
So as predicted the stupid old man was incapable of answering a simple question
The point, Anony, is that even then Repugs could say they at least TRIED to be fair to a woman who bravely came forward.
Okay. So you want to see Kavanaugh confirmed and the Republicans to look fair? It just seems more like you want him to fail.
My Friday passes committee--CORRECT
My Tuesday passing Senate may be delayed a couple of days at most
Great news is that the FBI should be able to get hold of those therapist notes the Democrats have been sitting on, look into why Ford or her council was lying about travel abilities and also root out the polygraph test. Hopefully her hotel room has two front doors while she waits there, hopefully safe from her lawyers. I suspect cocaine Mitch will get this process rolling quickly regardless.
of course while we wait the democrats will root out a witch doctor's daughter in the Congo that is spooked by Special K, and we know what that code stands for while judge K's family continues to be abused by rabid anti-ka followers.
and for "anonymous" check this out:
Five Big Problems with Christine Blasey Ford's Testimony at the Kavanaugh Hearings
https://pjmedia.com/trending/5-big-problems-with-christine-blasey-fords-testimony-at-the-kavanaugh-hearings/
Remember "this is not political" said the socialist.
Lol yeah right.
"Pelosi said, “There are woman out there including my own daughter who think what the president is trying to break thew Me too movement."
So silly.
UPDATE: Perhaps Flake inadvertently did the GOP a favor here.
bullshit.
flake did a favor for flake and the democrats. like i said on another thread, he's trolling for a big $$$ contract as the token cuck-servative on cnn or MSDNC. he'll probably get his own show sucking steve schmidt's cock. that would be right up this traitorous piece of shit's alley.
now the left has a whole extra week to trot out some more fake mentally ill victims. and just as the FBI is close to wrapping up, "WAIT! we have another one!"
i don't know what the fuck it is about RINO's from arizona. mcstain (may he burn in hell) fucked us on the 0linsky-care repeal vote after promising to do it, and now this.
Back in the real world. Winning Bigly.
"American consumer sentiment improved again in September, propelled higher as households in the bottom third of incomes hit the highest level since November 2000.
The University of Michigan Friday reportedthat its index of consumer sentiment hit 100.1 in September, topping 100 for only the third time since January 2004.
“Most of the September gain was among households with incomes in the bottom third, whose index value of 96.3 was the highest since November 2000,” said the Surveys of Consumers chief economist Richard Curtin. “In contrast, the Sentiment Index among households with incomes in the top third lost a total of 8.1% during the past seven months since reaching its cyclical peak of 111.9 in February 2018.”
Curtin pointed out that this indicates that the economic expansion “has now benefitted nearly all population subgroups.”
Economists had forecast consumer sentiment to rise a bit higher, to 100.8.."
There will be an FBI investigation.
Blogger Roger Amick said...
There will be an FBI investigation.
we're the only blog with a town crier named captain fucking obvious.
The investigation still remains on the desk of the President. The committee requested the investigation.
It just broke news bigot
after this kavanaugh fiasco is over mitch needs to strip flake of every single committee seat he holds and put his office on a fucking card table in a handicapped restroom stall... in the ladies room, since the cuck probably squats while he pees anyway.
Flake will be seen as an American hero.
The Senate Judiciary Committee has approved, along party lines, the nomination of Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court – with a request that the FBI conduct an investigation into sexual assault allegations before the full Senate takes a vote
Blogger Roger Amick said...
It just broke news bigot
i heard it on the radio in my truck TWO FUCKING HOURS AGO, wino.
The committee had plenty of time to investigate...
And grassley's led committee failed worse than the nunes and gowdy boondoggles.....Yeah....your opinion is duly noted and will be ignored by most people with brains.....
Any though on why judge is soooo concerned with a secret interview????? Could it be he has a better memory than Bretty????/
Commonsense said...
Now you know why conservatives hate Flake.
Yeah....he has a working brain, unlike you cramps....LOL
He has made it dependent upon an FBI investigation. This matters because the other witnesses Judge of the attempted rape by Judge Brett and has said that he will testify to the FBI. If he lies he will be prosecuted.
Since he's already been investigated by the FBI six times, and the judiciary committee has its own investigative results to turn over to the FBI, this will be a quick effort that will conclude that there's no evidence, no Corroboration, few specifics, and only accusations.
flake's a traitorous piece of shit cut from the same disgusting mavericky cloth as mcstain (may he burn if fucking hell for all eternity).
i've never seen anything like this. only in our modern republican party are traitors rewarded and applauded.
mitch needs to figure out a way to destroy this piece of shit when this is all over. perhaps a shiny new allegation of a heinous crime. perhaps flake needs to be investigated.
flake's a traitorous piece of shit cut from the same disgusting
What is most amusing rectum breath....your reaction means 1 thing.....he is doing the correct thing.....too funny and predictable for losers like you....
Anonymous Myballs said...
Since he's already been investigated by the FBI six times,
Which means the FBI didn't investigate his early life.....and you hope they do not uncover anything from the secretive Judge who has been in hiding.....LOL
mitch needs to strip flake of every single committee
Which will do what asshole? Bother him? Cost him pay???? Teach him a lesson???? Idiot..
This matters because the other witnesses Judge of the attempted rape by Judge Brett and has said that he will testify to the FBI.
WUT???
opioids kicked in, eh?
Got to hand it to the Democrats. They would never rat-fuck their own leadership like Flake, Collins and Mukowski did.
gosh, it would be a shame if someone found a hooker dead from a peruvian flake overdose in flake's office...
Blogger Commonsense said...
Got to hand it to the Democrats. They would never rat-fuck their own leadership like Flake, Collins and Mukowski did.
indeed.
and the only one who might get hurt in this whole deal is feinstein, and her penance will be getting beat in november. the corrupt old c*nt is 85 years old anyway, so who cares?
flake caved to a fucking lunatic.
https://youtu.be/bshgOZ8QQxU
flake caved to a fucking lunatic.
2 sexual abuse victims....maybe if some big buck butt fucked your kids, you just might change your bigoted and stupid attitude.....asshole...until then, the only lunatic is your own stupidity...
Of course:
Dr. Ford’s lawyer, Debra S. Katz, on FBI probe: "No artificial limits as to time or scope should be imposed on this investigation."
Former Employer Sued Third Kavanaugh Accuser For Sexual Harassment Allegations
Julie Swetnick, the third woman to accuse Brett Kavanaugh of sexual misconduct in high school, faced allegations from her former employer that she engaged in “unwelcome, sexually offensive conduct” in 2000.
•WebTrends alleged in a lawsuit that, after the company determined she had engaged in “inappropriate conduct,” Swetnick made “false and retaliatory allegations” of sexual harassment against two male co-workers.
https://dailycaller.com/2018/09/28/kavanaugh-accuser-swetnick-sued/
Sarah SandersVerified account @PressSec ·
Statement from President @realDonaldTrump:
“I’ve ordered the FBI to conduct a supplemental investigation to update Judge Kavanaugh’s file. As the Senate has requested, this update must be limited in scope and completed in less than one week.”
An investigation into the background is not an investigation into allegations of attempted rape if they had been known of.
The best part of Thecoldheartedtruth.
flake's a traitorous piece of shit cut from the same disgusting mavericky cloth as mcstain (may he burn if fucking hell for all eternity).
An investigation into the background is not an investigation into allegations of attempted rape if they had been known of.
A supplemental backround check is the only investigation the FBI can do. If you want a criminal investion the victim would have to file a criminal complaint.
However, they would have to use the law as it was in 1982. Then attempted sexual assult was a misdemeanor with a statue of limitations of one year.
Top Catholic Magazine Revokes Kavanaugh Endorsement After ‘Illegitimate’ Hearing
A supplemental backround check is the only investigation the FBI can do. If you want a criminal investion the victim would have to file a criminal complaint.
precisely. and thanks for picking up on this stupid alky-ism since i had missed it.
the only thing the FBI can do at this point is yet another background check. that will make seven.
so here's what happens next -
the FBI comes back with nothing, and the democrats figure out a way to charge kavanaugh with a crime in order to open a criminal investigation. maybe they get dr. cray cray to file the complaint or maybe they find some other mentally ill sap to do it, but either way that's where this very well could go. at that point we're into the full swing of the mid terms and the whole fucking thing just falls apart at that point, and perhaps even kavanaugh throws in the towel.
Anonymous James said...
Top Catholic Magazine Revokes Kavanaugh Endorsement After ‘Illegitimate’ Hearing
oh gosh. altar boy sodomy weekly pulls away. LOL. that's rich.
"precisely. and thanks for picking up on this stupid alky-ism since i had missed it.
the only thing the FBI can do at this point is yet another background check. that will make seven."
So the FIB finishes and how many Socialist then vote yes 45, 40, 35...?
If The FBI Is Investigating These Allegations, They Absolutely Must Investigate Ford's Credibility
Questions that must be asked of Ford, and her lawyers, and Democrats -- under oath.
1. Democratic staffers, particularly those of Diane Feinstein, must be asked under oath and under penalty of felony if they leaked Ford's name and/or her letter to friendlies in the media.
2. Ford must be asked, under oath, which therapist notes she gave to the Washington Post. She was asked this yesterday, but suffered one of her notorious memory lapses and said she didn't know and would have to ask her lawyers. Which she then proceeded to not ask them.
3. Obviously, any time she claims she doesn't know and that only her lawyers would know, her lawyers must be asked under oath.
Her lawyers, by the way, cannot invoke lawyer-client privilege regarding notes they gave to a third party. Information given to a third party is not a confidential lawyer-client communication and not shielded by privilege.
There is no such thing as "Lawyer-Feinstein privilege," and Ford's political operators with legal licenses should not be permitted to invent one.
4. Her therapist's notes must be taken up by the FBI. Literally nobody in America believes that Ford and her husband were at a marriage counselor about a disagreement about adding a second door to the house.
What were they really in therapy for? People have been known to lie in therapy if it's needed to keep themselves out of trouble from their spouse.
5. Why did she lie when she claimed she could not fly? Did her lawyers tell her to say that? The parties can invoke privilege here, but their invocation of privilege -- refusing to answer questions in an investigation they demanded -- should be noted and publicized.
6. Did her lawyers inform her that Republicans had offered to fly to California or did they hide that from her? Or did they just tell her to lie about it?
7. All correspondence between her lawyers and Diane Feinstein and other Democrats must be submitted to the FBI. We suspect coordination, and if there's going to be an investigation, we want it all investigated.
8. Her personal polygraphologist must explain how he conducted the test, how long he took to prep her, etc.
And who paid him. And whether or not a certain result was expected.
9. And a big one -- how many other people has Ford accused of sexual harassment or assault? Perhaps this is her first and only time. If so, that adds to her credibility.
But if she has a history of making claims -- that detracts from it.
[...]
Note that the Democrats never claimed "And this is the first time Ford has ever made this type of accusation!"
Were that the case, I would imagine they would have shot that arrow from their quiver.
But the did not shoot that arrow from their quiver.
So I assume, tentatively, that that arrow is not in their quiver.
I would like to know if she made other allegations, who she reported them to, and what the final disposition was in any investigations into any prior allegations.
Question 10 to Round It Out: Commenters are saying: She should be made to recover/reveal her deleted/nuked social media accounts.
There was a reason her Political Operatives With Legal Licenses bleach bitted them. It's time to see what she's been saying for the past decade.
The Democrats demanded a full investigation -- it's time to have one.
http://ace.mu.nu/archives/377326.php
James is now a Catholic?
Nope. And you sure aren't much of one. :-)
So the FIB finishes and how many Socialist then vote yes 45, 40, 35...?
and there's the stupidity of it all. this swings not a single vote. not one. it's a stall, pure and simple.
when this is all over and if kavanaugh does make it through i hope someone goes after dr. cray cray and her scumbags lawyers with all the fury of hell unleashed. investigate them back to birth, stalk them, spy on them, taunt them out of public spaces and restaurants...
...give them the full panti-fag treatment times ten.
destroy their lives in every way humanly possible.
Vox: Every time Ford and Kavanaugh dodged a question, in one chart
WOW
"Of course:
Dr. Ford’s lawyer, Debra S. Katz, on FBI probe: "No artificial limits as to time or scope should be imposed on this investigation."
Never ever attempt to make a deal to with a Socialist.
I wish all American women could see this blog.
Notice how few women ever show up here.
Vox???
What a fucking idiot
What if the FBI itself requests more time?
Will Republicans say, NO! Don't truncate our witch hunt!
Of course not one Socialist will moved to Vote Yes. Over the next few days how many more paid for socialist will accuse Bret?
Trump issued a carefully worded order to the FBI.
@realDonaldTrump:
“I’ve ordered the FBI to conduct a supplemental investigation to update Judge Kavanaugh’s file. As the Senate has requested, this update must be limited in scope and completed in less than one week.”
What if the FBI itself requests more time?.
Lol, Jane, the request is there now, should be done by Monday after a cup of coffee and a bagel/donut.
Mark Judge Meets with His Lawyer
Mark Judge, the man who was said to be present when Brett Kavanaugh allegedly sexually assaulted Christine Blasey Ford, was in Washington, D.C., meeting with his lawyer Friday afternoon, the HuffPost reports.
Judge arrived at the law firm just as the Senate Judiciary Committee was preparing to vote to advance Kavanaugh’s Supreme Court confirmation.
His lawyer issued a statement saying Judge “was willing to cooperate with any law enforcement investigation, so long as it took place ‘confidentially.'”
_________________________
Some things you can't duck, somebody better tell him.
Yale Law School Calls for Kavanaugh Inquiry
Yale Law School, where Judge Kavanaugh studied, on Friday called for further investigation into the allegations against the Supreme Court nominee, the Wall Street Journal reports.
Said law school dean Heather Gerken: “Proceeding with the confirmation process without further investigation is not in the best interest of the Court or our profession.”
James said...
What if the FBI itself requests more time?
Will Republicans say, NO! Don't truncate our witch hunt!
Kind of like you never answering my earlier question?
Stupid old man
limited in scope
He's limiting the investigation.
Jeff Flake calls in the FBI
Democrats are getting their requested FBI investigation into Brett Kavanaugh, setting up a week of tension as investigators launch a time-limited probe into the allegations that surfaced in recent weeks.
Driving the news: Jeff Flake publicly changed his course on the Kavanaugh nomination after being personally challenged by a pair of sexual assault survivors.
9:26 a.m: Flake said he was a yes on Kavanaugh.
9:30 a.m.: On his way to the Judiciary Committee vote, Flake was confronted by two sexual assault survivors, who refused to allow his elevator door to close. Their quotes were captured on live video:
Ana Maria Archila to Flake: “What you are doing is allowing someone who actually violated a woman to sit on the Supreme Court."
Maria Gallagher to Flake: “Look at me and tell me that it doesn’t matter what happened to me, that you will let people like that go into the highest court of the land and tell everyone what they can do to their bodies."
The senator then reached the Judiciary Committee hearing, where he didn't speak and looked shaken.
12:17 p.m.: Flake left the room, and eventually others joined him, including his Democratic friend Chris Coons of Delaware.
As the minutes passed, reporters began to realize that the result looked less certain.
Chairman Chuck Grassley and Ranking Member Dianne Feinstein also went to that room, returning and leaving several more times.
1:51 p.m.: Flake returned, and Grassley allowed him to speak:
Flake said he wanted a week delay on the final floor vote to allow for a limited FBI probe into the Kavanaugh allegations.
Grassley started the vote, which passed 11-10, with Flake voting yes.
3:35 p.m. Senate Majority Whip John Cornyn said there will be a supplemental FBI investigation lasting no more than a week.
The key questions: What if the week ends with the investigation ongoing, or if the probe uncovers new evidence outside the existing claims?
Between the lines: Such a delay presents both peril and promise for Kavanaugh. On the one hand, it means investigators will likely talk to Mark Judge. On the other hand, if a probe doesn't turn up new evidence, it gives senators on the fence an easier time voting yes.
limited in scope
That's exactly what Flake requested "limited in time and scope". And the Democrats agreed to it.
Christina Ford refuses to cooperate with an FBI investigation.
Chief Wray isn't going to limit the scope of the investigation despite what the President wants.
That's a total fabrication.
Limited to credible. So far nothing is credible.
As for ford,we still don't know when, where, how she got there, how she got home, and we don't have a witness either.
Fox News averaged a whopping 5.7 million viewers from 10 a.m. to 7 p.m. ET during the hourslong hearing on Thursday, topping MSNBC (2.9 million) and CNN (2.5 million) combined.
This could have major impact on midterm elections as conservative TV ratings are surging due to the hearing coverage. Crazy big numbers
Last Man Standing on FOX was really good. Good to have that show back.
Nov 9th, 2016 at 3 am Central Standard Time. Socialist became pure white hot hate.
"Debra Katz, a lawyer for Christine Blasey Ford, said on Friday that "artificial limits" should not be placed on the FBI as it reopens its background investigation into Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh.
"No artificial limits as to time or scope should be imposed on this investigation," Katz said in a statement. "
Never enough. It will never be enuff.
Chief Wray isn't going to limit the scope of the investigation despite what the President wants.
Chiefs? There are cheifs at the FBI now.
Director Wray has already stated they don't do criminal investigations beyond their normal jurisdiction and since this is an expanded backround check they will not go beyond their charge from the President.
However, you can be sure the Chrinstine Ford will receive a more thourgh interview then the softball questions she got at the hearing.
Which is probably why she's balking.
No artificial limits as to time or scope should be imposed on this investigation," Katz said in a statement. "
Translation: Don't investigate my client, investigate everybody else.
A big diffrence for Kavanaugh's statement.
"I have answered all questions from the FBI and the senate judiciary committee and will continue to cooperate with the FBI and senate."
Or even Mark Judge's:
"I will cooperate with law enforcement authorities and answer their question if it can be private and confidential."
Katz has not said her client will cooperate.
Translation: Don't investigate my client, investigate everybody e
Horse shit cramps.....Why wouldn't Bretty boy answer the question would he personally support the FBI investigation????? Me thinks he knows what they will find and his career path will go down the shitter including his current job!!!! Katz's client said under oath she embraces the investigation and will answer anything they ask.....Again, cramps shows his selective hearing when slurping on trumps fat white ass....
This is the party menstral supports....the one that thinks women should be seen, not heard....a trip back to the middle ages...just the way old cultist white men like it....!!!
Many women have been eyeing the Republican Party with growing unease since it was taken over by Donald Trump, whose retrograde views on gender are straight out of the 1950s — or maybe the 1590s. Confronted with serious and credible allegations against Judge Kavanaugh, Republican lawmakers could have seized the moment to reassure anxious women that they realized some issues transcend partisanship. Instead, they failed, quite spectacularly, to rise to the occasion — turning their furious defense of the nominee into an illuminating microcosm of the disregard and disrespect for women that have become hallmarks of Mr. Trump’s Republican Party.
As the Kavanaugh nightmare took form, women watched in dismay as Republican lawmakers worked to discredit Dr. Blasey by suggesting that she was either hopelessly confused, a political pawn or a liar. They watched in disbelief as Republicans repeatedly declined to call for an independent investigation into Dr. Blasey’s allegations, much less the subsequent ones brought by Deborah Ramirez and Julie Swetnick. They watched in frustration as Republicans failed to call material witnesses or outside experts to testify.
And women most definitely were watching on Thursday, when the Senate Judiciary Committee spent the day listening to the testimony of Judge Kavanaugh and Dr. Blasey. Women saw how the 11 Republican men brought in a female prosecutor to chip away at Dr. Blasey’s account, while showing little interest in the alleged attack itself. They saw how those same Republican men then tripped over themselves to assure Judge Kavanaugh that they felt his pain and were so very sorry that Democrats had, as Senator Lindsey Graham shrieked in a display of self-righteous hysteria, conspired to put the nominee “through hell.”
Blogger Roger Amick said...
That's a total fabrication.
you're an imbecile. read flake's statement, alky. his statement said "limited in time and scope."
trump is staying right the fuck out of this.
kavanaugh has been through six background investigations. flake's will make seven. this should take all of about 15 minutes to complete, since there's no aspect of kavanaugh's life that hasn't been scrutinized.
you sick fucks who get off lon destroying people are just looking to destroy mark judge too. THAT'S what this is all about. and if you had your way the FBI would begin a multi-year fishing expedition like mueller's to drive brett kavanaugh or his wife, to suicide like you guys did to miguel estrada.
you're the scum of the earth, alky. the absolute scum.
I imagine at lot of media are going to be shocked at the results of the election.
kavanaugh has been through six background investigations.
You know less about background checks that security clearances.....asshole....Why don't you post what they doing a background check instead of guessing, asshole.....You might learn something, but I doubt it!!! LOLOL
Blogger Commonsense said...
I imagine at lot of media are going to be shocked at the results of the election.
read the whole thing:
Kavanaugh, Cold Anger and The Reckoning….
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/09/27/kavanaugh-cold-anger-and-the-reckoning/
Katz and Ford agrees to meet FIB agent on Monday, 9 am Hoover Building.
Oh Canada caves, agrees to Pres. Trumps terms on New Canadian-mexico-American Trade deal.
Why didn't Obama get this done ?
flake fell for a con:
Ana Maria Archila, one of the women who confronted Jeff Flake on the elevator at the Capitol after he said he was voting for Brett Kavanaugh, is the co-executive director for the Center for Popular Democracy and the Center for Popular Democracy Action Fund.
The Center For Popular Democracy is heavily funded by George Soros. The organization also identified Maria Gallagher to the press as the other woman confronting Flake.
https://bigleaguepolitics.com/woman-who-confronted-flake-in-elevator-runs-soros-funded-organization/
so... lying about being a sexual assault victim is cool, right liberals?
It's becoming more apparent that Judge Cavanaugh had a serious problem with alcohol when he was younger. Extreme inebriation can cause people to act out in many ways that they normally would do. The description by his college roommate described him as frequently to the point where he was slurring and acting aggressively towards women.
That doesn't mean that he is an alcoholic. If he doesn't drink to excess anymore. But the actions of a highly intoxicated man can often result in aggressive sexual behavior. Especially when the man is young.
Doctors Ford's description of his aggressive sexual behavior sounded very credible.
Ana Maria Archila was also a victim of sexual assault. Her current position has no impact upon her credibility except in the demented mind of the blog racist bigot.
Ana Maria Archila had never told her father that she was sexually abused as a child.
That is common behavior of victims of childhood sexual abuse.
As I said before that I know a woman who was sexually assaulted by her neighbor. She didn't speak out for many years.
tExtreme inebriation can cause people to act out in many ways that they normally would do.
So Roger how many women did you rape while you were extremely inebriated?
Serious drinking problem?? You're projecting again. No he didn't.
r how many women did you rape while you were extremely inebriated?
And you wonder why I call you an idiot, cramps....How many stupid pills do you take to suck on donnie's manhood????
Ana Maria Archila was also a victim of sexual assault.
sure she was, alky.
and i have some oceanfront property in idaho for sale cheap.
liberals LIE, alky. it's what they do. the propensity to lie is hardcoded in their DNA.
now then, in terms of actual sexual assaults that really did happen, what's the latest on keith ellison? has that been fully swept under the rug yet? oh, that's right, it ain't sexual assault if you're a democrat.
I was never sexually abusive before I drank in excess or when I did.
Not everyone who drank to excess is a rapist. You have probably drank to excess at times. So how many women did you rape while you were extremely inebriated?
aren't you awful proud of yourself now, jeffy? you got conned by an lying asshole activist, and this is the thanks you get:
Women’s March thanks Sen. Jeff Flake by calling him a ‘rape apologist’
https://twitchy.com/gregp-3534/2018/09/28/womens-march-thanks-sen-jeff-flake-by-calling-him-a-rape-apologist/
well played, you dumb fuck.
Not everyone who drank to excess is a rapist.
oh yes they are, alky. you see, liberals have handed down a set of new rules to the rest of us. all we have to do is float the accusation and *PRESTO* you're a drunken fucking rapist.
just like that.
no proof, no evidence, no nothing required. just an accusation will suffice.
so...
how many women did your drunk ass rape, alky??? can you even remember, you drunken fucking rapist???
Katherine S. van Wormer M.S.S.W., Ph.D.
Crimes of Violence
Alcohol Intoxication, Violence, and Judge Kavanaugh
Research into alcohol's effects helps explain aggressive drunken behavior.
Posted Sep 25, 2018
As Judge Kavanaugh was facing scrutiny for his reported sexual harassment of girls and women in his youth and his denial of the charges, large numbers of his friends and colleagues expressed disbelief that the person they had known would have behaved in such a manner. ”It would be out of character,” as several who know him best have said. At the same time, Professor Christine Ford’s charge that he had sexually assaulted her at a party in a fit of drunken violence seemed very convincing to others, and hard to reconcile with Kavanaugh’s description of his lifetime of public service, church-going, and showing respect for women.
article continues after advertisement
We can make sense of the discrepancy here between the two conflicting portraits of Brett Kavanaugh by looking into the science of alcohol studies. What happens to the person when his or her blood alcohol level is very high? Are there personality or biological differences that emerge through very heavy drinking?
I would like to focus on the statement by the judge’s former roommate at Yale, James Roche. As quoted in the Huffington Post, Roche stated that the two of them would talk in evenings. “It is from this experience,” he said, “that I concluded that although Brett was normally reserved, he was a notably heavy drinker, even by the standards of the time, and that he became aggressive and belligerent when he was very drunk.”
As an expert on alcoholism, a former alcoholism counselor and co-author of Addiction Treatment (2018, Cengage Publishing Co.), I find this description very significant. There are certain drugs closely associated with violence—these are cocaine, meth, and alcohol. This statement by the Yale roommate gives us a clue toward understanding some of the contradictions expressed in the media concerning the judge’s ethics and character.
One of Kavanaugh’s supporters interviewed on CNN, seemed sincerely perplexed by Professor Ford’s accusation. She disclosed that as Kavanaugh’s colleague, she had seen him drink wine and beer and he had never gotten aggressive. This is probably true, because it would take a lot more than one or two drinks before one’s personality was altered in any way. It could be that the personality is not really altered, but instead that when inhibitions are lowered through intoxication, unconscious drives and feelings come to the surface and are revealed. These actions and emotions often shock friends and family members who have not seen this side of the person previously.
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/crimes-violence/201809/alcohol-intoxication-violence-and-judge-kavanaugh
I may have blacked out a couple times.
I had a high tolerance for alcohol.
Accusing me of rape and sexual harassment or sexual assault is typical behavior from someone who can't stand being exposed as bigot on many occasions.
This is character assassination disguise by psychological pablum.
Katherine S. van Wormer M.S.S.W., Ph.D.
Crimes of Violence
awesome.
now the left is trotting out their nice little elitist professional "experts."
having never met or spoken directly with kavanaugh, this broad will proceed to hand down her verdict on what a drunken rapist he was and perhaps STILL IS.
and coincidentally, one of her "references" is mark judge's book:
References
Judge, M. (1997). Wasted: Tales of a Genx Drunk. Center City, MN: HazeldenLorenz, K., & U
you folks really do get off on destroying people, don't you alky? you drove miguel estrada's wife to suicide. i can only imagine the parties that were thrown in honor of THAT accomplishment.
Accusing me of rape and sexual harassment or sexual assault is typical behavior from someone who can't stand being exposed as bigot on many occasions.
don't blame me, alky rapist. these are your rules. we're just following them.
Accusing me of rape and sexual harassment or sexual assault is typical behavior from someone who can't stand being exposed as bigot on many occasions.
You're the one who insist that excessive alcohol ineberation leads to sexual assult.
So the question remains Roger. How many women or girls did you rape while you were drunk?
His abuse of alcohol when he was younger explained some of the contradictions between his own testimony and his college roommate Roche stated that the two of them would talk in evenings. “It is from this experience,” he said, “that I concluded that although Brett was normally reserved, he was a notably heavy drinker, even by the standards of the time, and that he became aggressive and belligerent when he was very drunk.”
Once again this does not mean that he assaulted Doctor Ford. But it lends credibility to her sworn testimony. And it damages his credibility.
Cue the insults.
Yet Dr Ford admitted that she drank and had problems remebering that night.
So why doesnt the same standard applied to her?
I did not say "You're the one who insist that excessive alcohol ineberation leads to sexual assult."
What it does is that it lends credibility to the sworn testimony by Doctor Ford.
If you continue to accuse me of sexual harassment or sexual abuse can put you in legal jeopardy. False public accusations are liable in civil court. I know who you are and where you live. Be careful.
And it damages his credibility.
and this is why i despise liberals.
all they live to do is damage people. heir credibility, their reputation, their families, their lives, everything must be destroyed in pursuit of a political goal.
you know rapist alky... it is ironic -
you and your stupid little me too game purports to want to protect people from the ravages of sexual assault, but the assaults that you guys conduct are so much more hurtful, shameful and damaging. it's probably the most vile and disgusting thing i've ever witnessed. and to use an obviously severely mentally ill person like dr. ford to accomplish your goal.
man, that's stone cold fucking evil.
If you continue to accuse me of sexual harassment or sexual abuse can put you in legal jeopardy. False public accusations are liable in civil court. I know who you are and where you live. Be careful.
alky, i don't think you understand. the precedent has been set, son. you have no legal standing. you might have at one time but not anymore. that ship has fucking sailed.
not only can anyone accuse you of anything they want, they can do so PUBLICLY. it's the new thing now.
me too, baby. me fucking too.
heh.
So why doesnt the same standard applied to her?
while hypocrisy is the bedrock of liberalism, the only standards liberalism has are double standards.
one for themselves, and one for their enemies.
It almost all cases of innocent men going to jail for rape the procecuters put a picture in from of the victim and they said that was the man. And they were 100% sure that was the man.
I believe that something similar happen to Ford. She didn't name her attacker until after Brett Kavanaugh name and picture became prominate. She look at his picture and said that was him.
She drank to excess.
"So why doesnt the same standard applied to her?"
Her credibility on the specifics is credible because a sexual assault is a highly emotional event. We all don't remember the specifics of events in our past but put yourself in the position that lets say that you were drinking with a friend who you didn't know that he was gay. And that he was a very powerful man who was much stronger than you had tried to get you to perform oral sex upon him. Wouldn't you remember the exact details of the events of over 30 years ago?
If you continue to accuse me of sexual harassment or sexual abuse can put you in legal jeopardy. False public accusations are liable in civil court. I know who you are and where you live. Be careful.
Go for it Roger.
I'll note for the record that you refused to answer the question.
Her credibility on the specifics is credible because a sexual assault is a highly emotional event.
that's grade A 100% bullshit.
she's no more credible than any other human being making the same exact claim.
she has an inherent right to be heard, but not an inherent right to be believed.
in fact, in terms of credibility, ford and kavanaugh are on completely equal footing.
Mensa you are not telling the truth. This is a 100% false statement.
"She didn't name her attacker until after Brett Kavanaugh name and picture became prominate. She look at his picture and said that was him."
She spoke to her husband and therapist long before she contacted Senator Feinstein at the request of anonymity.
She didn't speak out until Judge Kavanaugh was on the short list of potential nominees to the Supreme Court.
Be honest if you have that ability and ask yourself why would she step out and put herself into the public eye in the day of the social media environment and everything else?
How many women or girls did you rape while you were drunk?
None. Zero.
Stop now or I might just speak to a lawyer friend.
Kavanaugh more since he has at least some evidence in his calandars to back him up as well as testimoney from several ex-girlfriends who said he never acted like that.
Sexual assault does not happen in isolation. There would have been a pattern that the FBI would have picked up on during the first six backround checks.
"in fact, in terms of credibility, ford and kavanaugh are on completely equal footing."
A rare and unusually semi accurate statement. But as much more information regarding the behavior of Judge Kavanaugh as a student his credibility is getting weaker.
The background checks are limited to information available to the public or law enforcement agencies. Unless charges of sexual assault or harassment were reported to the police departments having jurisdiction of the nominee.
This argument doesn't stand scrutiny. That is just a talking point. Not relevant to the ongoing debate on the nomination of Brett Kavanaugh.
Blogger Roger Amick said...
Mensa you are not telling the truth. This is a 100% false statement.
it's factual, alky.
kavanaugh's pic was on the front page of the print edition of the ny times in 2012, floated as a possible romney ussc nominee. this is how long liberals like katz have been working to fuck him over. they found a presumably willing dupe in ford, leveraging her severe mental illness.
after this kavanaugh thing is finally over i'd like to see a full blown investigation into the democrats, including but not limited to every dem member of the judicial committee, dr. ford, her scumbag lawyer katz, and every single activist group even remotely attached to this debacle.
and let it be a mueller style investigation, staffed exclusively with republicans and conservatives, an unlimited budget, and a timeframe that has no end. let us fuck with these people until at least a few of them bourdain themselves. and then let's fuck with them some more.
How many women or girls did you rape while you were drunk?
None. Zero.
Stop now or I might just speak to a lawyer friend.
Why Roger you feel so angry and outrage over the slightest suggestion of a false accusation that you are ready to contemplate legal action.
That's not even a 10000th of the hell Kavanaugh and his family experianced because the false accusations level by your friends.
And yet you mocked him for being angry and outraged.
The background checks are limited to information available to the public or law enforcement agencies. Unless charges of sexual assault or harassment were reported to the police departments having jurisdiction of the nominee.
But as much more information regarding the behavior of Judge Kavanaugh
well fucking DUH.
every single crumb of ford's background was scrubbed from the web well in advance of her coming forward. and that was not by accident.
there's more info on kavanaugh because he's the only one who's been investigated, genius. let's investigate ford going all the way back to her childhood and see what we find.
let's begin with her mental health records.
Which one of your usual right wing websites that make this claim?
There is no evidence that Doctor Ford saw the picture on the New York Times and she decided to create a false accusation of sexual assault on Judge Cavanaugh just in case that he may eventually become nominated to the Supreme Court except in the waisted grey matter in your empty skull.
The Deep State conspiracy is alive and well here.
Blogger Roger Amick said...
The background checks are limited to information available to the public or law enforcement agencies. Unless charges of sexual assault or harassment were reported to the police departments having jurisdiction of the nominee.
without realizing it you've just acknowledged the fact that this additional FBI background check is meaningless and is being conducted simply as a stall tactic.
i used to work with a guy whose wife was being considered for employment with the FBI. he described the background check he went through, and it went all the way back to his youth on long island. people he hadn't talked to in fucking years were interviewed and the breadth and scope of the investigation was huge. and that was just on HIM as the spouse of a potential employee.
kavanaugh has been down this road six fucking times. if dr. cray cray's claims had even a hint of legitimacy they would've come out long ago.
what we're witnessing is an elaborate scheme that has been going on for a very, very long time.
There is no evidence that Doctor Ford saw the picture on the New York Times...
suddenly you need evidence? LOL!
how convenient.
there's not a shred of credible evidence that kavanaugh assaulted ford, yet here we are.
ain't hypocrisy awesome alky?
kavanaugh's pic was on the front page of the print edition of the ny times in 2012, floated as a possible romney ussc nominee
and suddenly she "remembered" a party. Her therapist notes should be disclosed at least to panel in confidence (they are being used as base evidence), an answer to why her mother, brother and siblings don't support her but her husbands side does. And definitely mental health records, she is obviously not "all there", sad as that is, and apparently at one time had a very good mind.
Basic logic tells us her story doesn't add up (she left her best friend in a house full of sexual predators and never told her best friend at the party when she left nor had a conversation the next day, after having just one beer, what she now says 30 plus years later and is about the only memory she has except drunken groping) What did happen to that friend, she must have been raped right and certainly would remember? How did she get home (she was 15, many miles from home in the middle of the night) Any logical person can see this person had some traumatic issue in her life but obviously Judge Kavanaugh had nothing to do with it.
To me Ford is the victim of Soros money and a manipulative DNC, and it is beyond shameful. Wonder now why he supported all those lib DA's running for office? Russian influence, there needs to be an investigation of the multi-billionaire Hungarian.
and the FBI needs to unscrub her online footprints.
end of rant. over and out.
WASHINGTON, D.C. — Taking a page from the Obama campaign playbook, Planned Parenthood Monday rolled out a last-ditch Facebook campaign aimed at scaring liberal voters to the polls highlighting what they imagine a future Supreme Court would look like under Mitt Romney.
The ad features a June 2014 New York Times front page — with imagined "stories" with bylines of actual NYT reporters Jeff Zeleny and Adam Liptak — trumpeting the overturning of Roe v. Wade and ominously warning that a Romney court nominee turned out to be the decicive vote.
The image, posted on Facebook by Planned Parenthood Action, imagines "newcomer Justice Kavanaugh" as joining in an opinion "written by Chief Justice John G. Roberts" that "threw the status quo on abortion rights out the window." Judge Brett Kavanaugh, currently on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, is imagined to have replaced Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who does not appear in the line-up of votes in the ad and is said to have "passed away" in the fake article.
https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/chrisgeidner/planned-parenthood-hopes-to-scare-liberals-with-la
my mistake. that pic of kavanaugh on the front page of the ny times in 2012 was a ruse promoted as advertising by planned butcherhood . but all the same, there it was.
A couple points.
The FBI has been under attack by the President from day one. He is trying to limit the depth of the investigations into alleged sexual abuse.
If the report concludes that the charges against Judge Kavanaugh are valid the President will not accept the findings. And everyone of you will agree with the President.
If the report shows no evidence in either case that proves the case either direction we will be facing a historical event in either direction.
There are Senators who are facing elections from both parties who will have to decide. Given the circumstances surrounding this situation I suspect that the Coldheartedtruth about the women's vote in November will favor the Democrats so the one or two wavering Republicans will probably vote against the nomination of Brett Kavanaugh.
But given my history in projections who the hell knows.
The FBI has been under attack by the President from day one. He is trying to limit the depth of the investigations into alleged sexual abuse.
flatly false. flake and the senate judiciary committee have defined the scope and duration of the FBI's investigation. trump, surprisingly, has stayed the fuck out of it. his only involvement is in an official capacity to approve the request.
If the report concludes that the charges against Judge Kavanaugh are valid the President will not accept the findings. And everyone of you will agree with the President.
genius, it is known by everyone with a functioning brain that FBI "investigations" such as this DO NOT draw conclusions. they accumulate evidence and testimony. THAT'S IT.
FD-302
An FD-302 from the Warren Commission.
A FD-302 form is used by FBI agents to "report or summarize the interviews that they conduct"[3][4] and contains information from the notes taken during the interview by the non-primary[further explanation needed] agent.
It consists of information taken from the subject, rather than details about the subject themselves.
A forms list from an internal FBI Website lists the FD-302 as Form for Reporting Information That May Become Testimony.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_FBI_forms#FD-302
If the report shows no evidence in either case that proves the case either direction we will be facing a historical event in either direction.
your opiates have kicked in i see. this can't get any more incoherent.
stick to things you know about alky, like abusing alcohol and women while intoxicated.
The FBI reports don't conclude anything.
FBI under attack?? You do realize that they've been referred for criminal prosecution?
The FBI can conclude nothing, but the FBI can release documentation that indicates that someone is lying, as seen against other pieces of documentation.
Look folks. The FBI report will not draw any conclusions. If the evidence shows that beyond a reasonable doubt that the charges by Doctor Ford are likely true then the President may attack the Federal bureau of investigation for political bias against Trump.
And every last one of you will agree with the President.
If it doesn't show either way, the most likely outcome,the women's vote in November could swing enough Senators against Kavanaugh.
The Miscalculation Haunting Kavanaugh
Jim VandeHei:
“Imagine if Brett Kavanaugh had offered his emotional, tearful, you-ruined-my-life opening speech to the Judiciary Committee — and then called for a quick FBI probe to clear his name and perhaps find the true assailant. He would have looked confident, humble, even a tad heroic, given the president who nominated him opposed the FBI probe.
“Well, he and Republicans had an epic failure of imagination: Instead, they were forced reluctantly and publicly into what should have been a fairly easy-to-anticipate moderate compromise: agree to a vote after a quick FBI probe.
“Instead of looking hungry for truth, Kavanaugh heads into the week looking fearful of findings.”
____________________
Vandetti's analysis is spot on. Each time a further investigation was suggested, Kavanaugh should have said, "I would more than WELCOME such an investigation to clear my name."
James said it correctly.
The FBI can conclude nothing, but the FBI can release documentation that indicates that someone is lying, as seen against other pieces of documentation.
Then the people who have to draw conclusions provided by the FBI.
So when the FBI releases it's report that there is still no evidence to backup Ford's story Kavanaugh should be confirmed, right?
The again the Democrats should be careful what they asked for (and why Ford deleted her social media postings).
Timothy Leblanc
I can be a witness but it would end well for her. I knew Chrissy Blasey for a long time. She posted on her Facebook that someone should accuse justice Gorsuch of RAPE!!. I told her that false accusations are an immoral crime. She said "SO".
Mind you it's a twitter post and I don't know if this Timothy Leblanc even exist, However if true, it's the first indication that she's not above hurling a false accusation at a SCOTUS nominee to derail it.
I expect this guys going to get a visit from the FBI .
Should read not end well.
And every last one of you will agree with the President.
you know alky, i would on occasion try to take you seriously if you weren't such a fucking hypocrite 100% of the time.
within 24 hours of kavanaugh's nomination virtually the entire democrat caucus came out in opposition to him. chuck schumer flatly stated that he would do everything in his power to stop kavanaugh's confirmation. all of this was said before a single democrat had met with or spoken with judge kavanaugh.
so for you to claim that we'll instinctively side with the president makes you look like a full blown hypocritical fucking asshole.
No he doesn't look fearful of fbi. He's been through it six times.
He's fearful of the next uncorroborated accusation.
Anonymous James said...
The Miscalculation Haunting Kavanaugh
Jim VandeHei:
well there you go. kavanaugh's problem is that he didn't seek counsel from the exact same scumbags who are trying to destroy him - insufferable liberal hacks like vandehei.
Blogger Commonsense said...
So when the FBI releases it's report that there is still no evidence to backup Ford's story Kavanaugh should be confirmed, right?
nope. that's when liberals will demand an extension.
so they can come up with more phony accusations.
we're not even close to seeing the extent that jeff flake has fucked the republicans.
someone needs to ruin the piece of shit.
nope. that's when liberals will demand an extension.
Doubtful rectum breath....someone needs to kick you in the groin....asshole....Flake is the only R with a brain....women are fleeing your idiots in droves, but like trump...you think they should just be a source of pussy....sad,
The FBI is going to find Bretty boy was a drunk in HS....and that is why he never answered whether he personally supported and investigation by the FBI.....I think you have a big problem.....and any delay will be because of findings....
Oh my goodness the investigation is not being limited
The FBI has begun contacting people as part of an additional background investigation of Judge Brett M. Kavanaugh, including a second woman who alleges that the Supreme Court nominee sexually assaulted her, according to people familiar with the unfolding investigation.
The bureau has reached out to Deborah Ramirez, a Yale University classmate of Kavanaugh’s who alleges that he shoved his genitals in her face at a party where she had been drinking and become disoriented. It was not clear that agents had yet interviewed Ramirez. But the FBI is moving quickly to contact people as part of the new background investigation, which President Trump ordered on Friday under pressure from key members of his party.
The penis flashed her.
Washington Fake News Post
Good it should be wrapped up by Tuesday.
The FBI director will not necessarily limit the scope of the investigation as the President wishes. He doesn't have the authority to intervene directly into investigations. If he tries to limit it we may face a Constitutional crisis. He can't use the FBI for his own political purposes but he probably doesn't understand that, or wants to expand his authority.
FBI covering ground already covered. This should be quick.
Limited to not chasing down every wild rabbit hole dems throw up.
They are going to interview Michael Aveanti's clients.
Balls watch the US Open and leave this open to almost rational thinking.
As well as the ex-boyfriend she threaten and the two workers she sexually harassed.
It you're hanging you hat on Avenatti then you are desperate.
He's fearful of the next uncorroborated accusation.
Why? The FBI investigation should reveal that, if it is uncorroborated.
It's the IF you and he fear.
Collin Rugg
Christine Ford has zero evidence to support her claims. Her friends deny the claims, her witnesses deny the claims and sources are saying that her own parents don’t support her claims.
The only people dumb enough to believe this buffoon are Dems.
Ford’s Friend Does Not Deny Assault Claim
“An attorney for Leland Keyser stated plainly in a letter to the Senate Judiciary Committee that his client, a friend of Christine Blasey Ford, does not ‘refute’ Blasey’s sexual assault claim against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh,” the HuffPost reports.
Said attorney Howard Walsh: “Ms. Keyser does not refute Dr. Ford’s account, and she has already told the press that she believes Dr. Ford’s account.”
Walsh added that “the simple and unchangeable truth” is that his client is “unable to corroborate” Ford’s account because she does not remember it.
______________________________
If something deeply disturbing had not happened to Ford that night, she would probably not remember that night so long ago.
None of the other people, except Ford and the two others allegedly involved, had any reason to remember that night as anything all that different from other such gatherings.
Why? The FBI investigation should reveal that, if it is uncorroborated.
Cristina Ford's are uncorroborated so is Ramerz's allagations. See how well that worked for him.
Avenatt's client's are so ridiculously uncorroborated that I don't think the FBI will waste much time on it.
Then you and he should have NOTHING to fear.
Why did it seem to worry him so much?
Pelosi Says Kavanaugh Was ‘Hysterical’ at Hearing
September 29, 2018 at 12:48 pm EDT By Taegan Goddard 143 Comments
House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi says that if Kavanaugh were a woman and had behaved as he did, everyone would be calling him “hysterical”
-- and said that he was temperamentally unfit to serve on the Supreme Court
CBS News reports.
Said Pelosi: “I couldn’t help but think that if a woman had ever performed that way, they would say ‘hysterical.'”
Pelosi also said that she believed Kavanaugh’s testimony proved that he could not serve on the Supreme Court, because it showed that he is biased against Democrats.
She added: “I will say this — if he is not telling the truth to Congress or to the FBI, then he’s not fit not only to be on the Supreme Court, but to be on the court he’s on right now.”
An interesting read about Bretty Boy and his bias...
http://www.telegram.com/news/20180929/american-bar-association-raised-concerns-about-brett-kavanaugh-12-years-ago
Because it's another week of putting his family through hell. And before you say that's what he signed up for and should quit. No one signs up for this. No one signs up to have you family threaten.
And the fact that a person cannot be nominated to high office without Democrat special interest groups trashing his reputation threatimg his family bodes Ill for anyone aspiring to high office in the republic.
Because it's another week of putting his family through hel
TOUGH FUCKING SHIT, cramps.......That's the price families pay for egotistical cry baby assholes who want to be important.....Oh well, he shoulda thought about his families travails before he said yes.....You should read the link I posted, you might come out of your coma, but I doubt it....
Yeah Dennis your everything I expect from a fat old castrated steer.
Pelosi Says Kavanaugh Was ‘Hysterical’ at Hearing
Pelosi's lack of compassion and cynicisim is the reason why she going to be the minority leader in January. That is, if her caucus keeps her.
Yale Classmate Says Kavanaugh Lied at Hearing
Liz Swisher, a former Yale classmate of Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, told CNN that she believes he lied under oath when testifying about his drinking to the Senate Judiciary Committee this week.
Said Swisher: “He drank heavily,” adding that he was a “sloppy drunk.”
She went on: “I don’t buy it. That’s not the Brett I knew, as soon as I met him in college. It’s not the Brett I saw during four years at Yale. And I don’t think many of his answers were credible. To lie under oath, to lie about that, then what else is true?”
Roger lecturing anyone on rational thinking is like bill Cosby giving dating advice.
If Kavanaugh was lying, what about his "lack of compassion" for Ford?
Well Kavanaugh is not lying and Ford has been treated with nothing but compassion and respect.
No so Kavanaugh from the Democrats who treat him with disrespect and disdain.
The day after Christine Blasey Ford gave an emotional testimony, Republican Sen. Jeff Flake voted to advance Brett Kavanaugh's Supreme Court nomination. It came with a stipulation: that a full vote in the Senate be delayed until the FBI can investigate the sexual assault allegations against him.
"I tried to yell for help. When I did, Brett put his hand over my mouth to stop me from yelling," said Christine Blasey Ford in her testimony.
Since then, President Donald Trump has ordered the FBI to conduct a supplemental investigation to "update Judge Kavanaugh's file." A statement from the White House says, "As the Senate has requested, this update must be limited in scope and completed in less than one week."
Kavanaugh's childhood friend Mark Judge, who Ford says was in the room at the time of the incident, has agreed to cooperate with investigators.
In a letter to the Senate Judiciary Committee, Judge responded to additional claims from Julie Swetnick. She's accused Kavanaugh and Judge of "abusive" behavior toward women and of being present at a party where she was raped. Judge said in the letter he doesn't know Swetnick and denied her allegations.
The FBI is also looking into accusations made by at least one other woman — Deborah Ramirez, who says Kavanaugh exposed himself to her while drinking their freshman year of college. As far as Kavanaugh's role in the investigation, he says he "will continue to cooperate."
Most Won’t Re-Elect Senators If They Vote for Kavanaugh
A new Change Research poll finds 51% of Americans wouldn’t vote to re-elect their senators if they vote to confirm Brett Kavanaugh.
A new YouGov survey finds that Americans believe Christine Blasey Ford was telling the truth about Kavanaugh assaulting her by 41% to 30%, while they are split on Kavanaugh’s honesty, 35% to 38%.
However, among those who reported having personally watched at least some of the hearings, 52% to 36%, said that they believed Ford, while they were split 44% to 46% on whether they believed Kavanaugh.
Wow...
Roger is admitting he was an abusive aggressive sex offender because he drank.
Who knew?
Kavanaugh was far more disrespectful and disdainful toward Dems than they were toward him.
A number of commentators have pointed out that never before has a candidate for the Supreme Court spoken so disdainfully of either of the political parties, a fact that in itself raises questions about his ability to be as impartial as he claims he would be.
Well Kavanaugh is not lying and Ford has been treated
He lied about the drinking age in Md when he was a senior....just that little tid bit takes away his holier than thou BS.....
A RINGING INDICATION OF THE TRUMP WHITE HOUSE'S HYPOCRISY AND LYING
___________________
White House LIMITS scope of the FBI's Kavanaugh investigation
--43 mins ago
WASHINGTON — The White House is limiting the scope of the FBI's investigation into the sexual misconduct allegations against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, multiple people briefed on the matter told NBC News.
While the FBI will examine the allegations of Christine Blasey Ford and Deborah Ramirez, the bureau has not been permitted to investigate the claims of Julie Swetnick, who has accused Kavanaugh of engaging in sexual misconduct at parties while he was a student at Georgetown Preparatory School in the 1980s, those people familiar with the investigation told NBC News. A White House official confirmed that Swetnick's claims will not be pursued as part of the reopened background investigation into Kavanaugh.
Ford said in Senate testimony Thursday that she was "100 percent" certain that Kavanaugh sexually assaulted her when they were both in high school. Ramirez alleged that he exposed himself to her when there were students at Yale. Kavanaugh has staunchly denied allegations from Ford, Ramirez and Swetnick.
Instead of investigating Swetnick's claims, the White House counsel's office has given the FBI a list of witnesses THEY ARE PERMITTED to interview, according to several people who discussed the parameters on the condition of anonymity. They characterized the White House instructions as a SIGNIFICANT CONSTRAINT on the FBI investigation and caution that such a limited scope, while not unusual in normal circumstances, may make it difficult to pursue additional leads in a case in which a Supreme Court nominee has been accused of sexual assault.
READ THE ENTIRE DISGUSTING ARTICLE.
THIS IS NOT WHAT FLAKE ASKED FOR.
THIS IS NOT WHAT THE AMERICAN PEOPLE EXPECT.
TRUMP DOES NOT OWN THE FBI, NOT DOES THE REPUBLICAN PARTY.
The FBI works for the President. They are not an elected body that works for the people. The only way they could otherwise investigate this issue would be with the direct request of the DOJ or the President, and then only within the scope that they are entitle to. In this case a back ground check.
The FBI has no authority to otherwise just randomly investigate citizens of the United States over political causes. It wouldn't matter if 99.99% of the people wanted them to, they are still not allowed to.
The FBI has been asked to reopen a background check to gather more information on these alleged issues.
If anyone believes that they have authority to do anything else, then they have been seriously mislead.
Yes this is what flake asked for. Look into credible allegations. Swetnicks are not even close.
Here is how it will go with the FBI and all third Party witnesses:
Did you see Brett Kavanaugh assault Christine Ford: No
Were you at the Party in question that Christine Ford refers to: No
Did you see Brett Kavanaugh expose himself at a dorm Party: No
Did you see Brett Kavanaugh participate in gang rapes: No
Did you see Brett Kavanaugh at the gang rape parties referred to: No
Whether he drank in High School or College does not factually matter to the allegations in question. What he wrote in a yearbook does not factually matter to the allegations in question. What Mark Judge's girlfriend says about Mark Judge doesn't matter to the allegations in question.
Fuck you.
I was never abusive sexually or any other way.
S.Scott Johnson is a fucking liar.
EMPHASES ADDED
WHITE HOUSE LIMITS Scope of Kavanaugh Investigation
--note, it's the WHITE HOUSE that does that--
“The White House is limiting THE SCOPE of the FBI’s investigation into the sexual misconduct allegations against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh,” NBC News reports.
“While the FBI will examine the allegations of Christine Blasey Ford and Deborah Ramirez, the bureau HAS NOT BEEN PERMITTED to investigate the claims of Julie Swetnick, who has accused Kavanaugh of engaging in sexual misconduct at parties while he was a student at Georgetown Preparatory School in the 1980s… A White House official confirmed that Swetnick’s claims WILL NOT BE PURSUED as part of the reopened background investigation into Kavanaugh.”
_______________
Dictators do not permit certain investigations.
Prediction: Others will come forward to share memories similar to those of Swetnick.
"If you continue to accuse me of sexual harassment or sexual abuse can put you in legal jeopardy. False public accusations are liable in civil court. I know who you are and where you live. Be careful." Alky the Rapist
Lol, go for it asshole.
You threatened to sue me before.
So has boy fucked Jane.
Both of you are all hat No Balls.
oth of you are all hat No Balls
And you are nothing more than a goat fucking moron that sucks trumps dick with gusto.....Yeah,....and probably as brave as his anonymous persona here....no balls no baby asshole...
Kavanaugh Made the Case to Vote Against Him
Benjamin Wittes:
“These are words I write with no pleasure, but with deep sadness. Unlike many people who will read them with glee—as validating preexisting political, philosophical, or jurisprudential opposition to Kavanaugh’s nomination—I have no hostility to or particular fear of conservative jurisprudence. I have a long relationship with Kavanaugh and I have always liked him. I have admired his career on the D.C. Circuit. I have spoken warmly of him. I have published him. I have vouched publicly for his character—more than once—and taken a fair bit of heat for doing so.
“Despite all of that, if I were a senator, I would vote against Kavanaugh’s confirmation. I would do it both because of Ford’s testimony and because of Kavanaugh’s. For reasons I will describe, I find her account more believable than his. I would also do it because whatever the truth of what happened in the summer of 1982, Thursday’s hearing left Kavanaugh non-viable as a justice.”
Post a Comment