Thursday, September 27, 2018

Man who claims he (not Brett Kavanaugh) was the alleged assaulter interviewed multiple times?

It was only a matter of time... but apparently there has been more than one person who has contacted the Judicial committee with the desire to clear Kavanaugh's name by taking the blame for the alleged attack.

It was him!
Reports suggest that at least one of those men has been taken fairly seriously, interviewed multiple times, and had offered at least some non-public information that matches up to information they have gathered in earlier interviews with Christine Ford.

I doubt that this person is going to be called to testify or even referenced today in the hearing, but it would seem like the sort of information that could reinforce support for Kavanaugh within the GOP Senate ranks.

In other words, if this person appears credible to Susan Collins, Jeff Flake, Lisa Murkowski, and Bob Corker, it may swing everything Kavanaugh's way when it comes time to vote. Amidst all the foot stomping and temper tantrums, what should ultimately matter is whether or not Judge Kavanaugh gets a fair hearing and a fair result. If these Senators do not believe that he did what he was accused of, then it's their obligation to vote for confirmation.

It's not very American to deprive someone of their liberty and pursuit, because of petty politics, because certain people want to punish him over the sins of others who grew up like him, or because one women has convinced herself that he is guilty. Only evidence that proves he did this should disqualify him.

6 comments:

Anonymous said...




here's what needs to happen to dr. cray cray with feinstein and schumer named as co-defendants:

Jury orders blogger to pay $8.4 million to ex-Army colonel she accused of rape

Riggins sued Shannon for defamation, claiming that every aspect of her rape claim on the West Point campus was “provably false,” and that she wrote two blog posts and a Facebook post “to intentionally derail [his] promotion” to brigadier general. During a six-day trial that ended Aug. 1, a jury in Fairfax County, Va., heard from both Riggins and Shannon at length. And after 2½ hours of deliberation, they sided emphatically with Riggins, awarding him $8.4 million in damages, an extraordinary amount for a defamation case between two private citizens. The jury ordered Shannon to pay $3.4 million in compensatory damages for injury to his reputation and lost wages, and $5 million in punitive damages, “to make sure nothing like this will ever happen again,” according to one of the jurors.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/true-crime/wp/2017/08/11/jury-orders-blogger-to-pay-8-4-million-to-ex-army-colonel-she-accused-of-rape/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.e51bb930a4a0

Anonymous said...


this is what the alky was pleasuring himself to late yesterday...


CNN and The Hill both spread a bombastic accusation of sexual assault against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh on Wednesday, without mentioning that the man who made the accusation has since retracted the claim and apologized for making it.

http://dailycaller.com/2018/09/26/cnn-the-hill-brett-kavanaugh-rhode-island-sexual-assault-recanted/


James said...

Still another reason for an FBI investigation.
Why are you Repugs so opposed to it?

C.H. Truth said...

Still another reason for an FBI investigation.
Why are you Repugs so opposed to it?


Actually James...

It's the FBI who is opposed to it. Feinstein already provided the FBI with everything regarding Ford, and they did exactly what they could do with it, which was document it. Because there is nothing to investigate.

You expect them to go find the SVU team, with a busload of forensic tools, and rush over to Virginia to do... what exactly? She can't even tell you where it allegedly happened, and it allegedly happened 36 years ago.

The only thing that can be done with this situation is to interview these witnesses under oath, which can and has been done by the Senate Judiciary committee.

Let's be clear here James... this is not a criminal matter. This is a political matter.

Anonymous said...

James and Alky are not reasonable boys.

Commonsense said...

Lindsey Graham does not believe one of the men who came forward, the jury is out on the other man.