Supreme Court rules on transgenders serving in the military. This is an important ruling because it could effect maybe 2 people in the world.— MARK SIMONE (@MarkSimoneNY) January 22, 2019
Supreme Court rules on transgenders serving in the military. This is an important ruling because it could effect maybe 2 people in the world.— MARK SIMONE (@MarkSimoneNY) January 22, 2019
26 comments:
Cari Kelemen @KelemenCari
Nancy Pelosi:
She reneges on her written word
She makes up fake concerns like security
She uses military planes like her personal airline
She takes dozens of family members on her trips at taxpayer expense
She's taken time to vacation during the shutdown while being paid
Lori Hendry @Lrihendry
Nancy Pelosi complaining that 800,000 government workers not getting paid.
My response is 20+ million illegals are getting paid.
Build the damn wall! #PettyPelosi
Ezra Levant 🍁 @ezralevant
There is a reason Venezuela was not free until today.
Here is Barack Obama, warmly greeting the butcher Hugo Chavez, while his successor, Nicolas Maduro, looks on.
The citizens of Venezuela have suffered for too long at the hands of the illegitimate Maduro regime. Today, I have officially recognized the President of the Venezuelan National Assembly, Juan Guaido, as the Interim President of Venezuela." Naco-President
Here is Barack Obama, warmly greeting the butcher Hugo Chavez, while his successor, Nicolas Maduro, looks on.
now there's a photo that needs to be prominently displayed in the new skeets hussein 0linsky presidential library, bodega and pawn shop at cabrini green.
hang it right between the lottery tickets and the cigarettes.
because it could effect maybe 2 people in the world.
About the same amount of individuals affected by baking wedding cakes for gays....Seems to me Lil Scotty.....that you are a hypocrite of immense proportions....Nice try though....because trump did it you keep slurping.....idiot...
now there's a photo that needs to be prominently displayed
Which annoys you....it succeeded!!!!
it succeeded in completely destroying a country and its people.
so yes denny, by a measure of complete destruction, resulting in people raiding zoos to kill and eat the inhabitants, it succeeded.
and geniuses like assholio fucktardio cortez want to bring that level of "success" to our shores.
brilliant.
MARACAIBO, Venezuela (Reuters) - Venezuela authorities are investigating the theft of animals from a zoo in western state of Zulia that were likely snatched to be eaten, a further sign of hunger in a country struggling with chronic food shortages.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-venezuela-animals/police-believe-thieves-steal-venezuela-zoo-animals-to-eat-them-idUSKCN1AW2NN
cowardly king obama said...
Lori Hendry @Lrihendry
FUCK LORI HENDRY...... another loser of the right who'd look great with my dick in her mouth......
so yes denny, by a measure of complete destruction,
You mean like trump is destroying the rule of law....threatening peoples family he does not like....like that asshole?????
http://liberalvaluesblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Putin-Trump.jpg
Yep.....that vulcan mind meld in full view....LOLOLOLOL
"geniuses like assholio fucktardio cortez want to bring that level of "success" to our shores."
She is not alone. Denise calls the destruction of Venezuela an "Obama/Socialist , Success".
care to give even one example of trump destroying the rule of law?
just one.
oh, and relax... rudy didn't put out a contract on cohen. cohen's a lying clown. if anything, someone told mumbles cummings that calling cohen in to testify was pointless.
just think den-bo, if cohen's testimony resulted in anything new, cohen would instantly be in violation of the deal he cut with mueller and the SDNY.
iow's it NEVER made any sense to call upon cohen to testify other than cheap theatre. and since democrats can't legislate and can only engage in cheap political theatre, here we are.
Venezuela "invested" heavily in renewables, bankrupting the treasury and depleting their economy. That and they went to the Maxine Waters model of oil production."
Waters called for nationalizing oil companies during a May 2008 hearing. She initially said “this liberal will be all about socializing” before correcting herself, and after a long pause continued to say, “basically taking over, and the government running all of your companies.”
Blogger KD said...
Waters called for
And I called for you to disappear....SO FUCKING WHAT....even an idiot like you goat fucker realize that it did not happen or will in the future...Another POS you heard somewhere else and get brainwashed .....so simple for your simple mind llll
Chairwoman of the House Financial Services Committee .... yep Maxine Waters she has new power. She will wield it. We know her beliefs.
When Denise get confused by facts he falls to his knees looks to the sky and bleats " so what" .
speaking of honest tweets...
Mollie
Verified account
@MZHemingway
Follow Follow @MZHemingway
More
The thing I keep thinking about: if many media types are dishonest about reporting contradicted and shown to be dangerously false by hours of extensive video evidence, how astronomically much are they misreporting their claims based on absolutely nothing but anonymous sources?
6:28 AM - 23 Jan 2019
i've been thinking this since the very first anonymously sourced trump hit piece was published.
Just one????
Too numerous to count.....Undermining the DOJ....calling private citizens out if they testify against him....complimenting others that keep mum.....calling the FBI a left wing front......the vast hidden government plotting against him.....Making deals with putin then lying about it....
https://www.lawfareblog.com/legitimacy-and-rule-law-under-donald-trump
https://www.law.com/ctlawtribune/2018/12/18/follow-the-leader-courtesy-and-the-rule-of-law-in-the-age-of-trump/?slreturn=20190024083554
Forgot about his beef about the heritage of judges.....his embrace of white supremacists as being good......
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2018/04/trumps-assault-on-rule-of-law/557600/
More broadly, Trump has attacked the special counsel. The point of having a special counsel is to insulate an investigation from political pressure—indeed, Rosenstein appointed Mueller when he felt that the tenor of Trump’s earlier comments and actions made it impossible for the Justice Department to adequately investigate Russian interference in the 2016 election through normal channels. In his comments about Mueller, Trump has not broken any laws (as far as we know), but he has most certainly violated the spirit of the special-counsel regulation, attempting to pressure Mueller at all turns. He said in an interview that if Mueller investigated his personal business, it would cross a “red line.” He reportedly tried to fire Mueller, only to be talked down by aides. He has blasted the probe left and right, and on Monday all but threatened to fire Mueller again.
“We'll see what happens,” the president said. “Many people have said, ‘You should fire him.’”
Rosenstein appointed Mueller because he is the acting attorney general for Russian matters, after Sessions recused himself from related probes. That this infuriates Trump is another example of Trump’s crusade against rule of law. Sessions recused himself on the advice of career Justice Department staff and in accordance with department guidelines. Trump has no regard for the rules and procedures.
i asked for one. you provided zero.
you're not just stupid. you're alky-stupid.
oh, and relax... rudy didn't put out a contract on cohen. cohen's a lying clown. if anything, someone told mumbles cummings that calling cohen in to testify was pointless.
After the media failures this past week it is not even news that the media latched on to Cohen's drama queen performance. It's more a problem for the Democrats hoping to get something on Trump.
oh, and relax... rudy didn't put out a contract on cohen.
Nah...he just hooked the FIL into a Ukraine mob activity.....I'm sure if rudy did the same with your idiot family, you might be upset...but knowing you have trumps dick in your mouth....you wouldn't say a word.....
i asked for one. you provided zero.
Sure asshole. your opinion is once again noted and laughed at!!!!...you have trouble with reading and like cramps, getting trumps dick out of your mouth.....sad your blindness is so pronounced....LOLLOLOLOL!!!
From town hall and Judge Napolitano maybe rectum breath will open his jaded eyes
Last week, The New York Times published a scathing critique of Donald Trump -- the man and the president. The Times said the critique was written by a senior Trump administration official who insisted on remaining unnamed. This bitter and harsh editorial, which portrays the president as dangerous to the health of the republic and his White House as slouching toward dysfunctionality, has understandably infuriated him.
Trump first accused the Times and its unnamed writer of treason, and then he publicly asked for a Department of Justice investigation to find the writer. Then, to change the subject, he threatened to declassify documents submitted to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court in 2016 -- before he was president -- that he believes were used to commence the Robert Mueller-led investigation of his presidential campaign.
I am deeply disappointed that the president uttered the word "treason." This is wrong under the law and a dangerous charge to make. The Times op-ed is protected political speech and personal opinion. Treason is the only crime defined in the Constitution, thereby preventing Congress and the courts from changing its meaning. It consists only of either waging war against the United States or any of the states or providing aid and comfort to those who are waging such a war.
The president should know that it is nearly impossible to commit treason by expressing an opinion. Even calling for a Nazi victory over the U.S. during World War II -- as hateful and harmful as such speech was -- constituted protected speech and was hardly treasonous.
Preventing a repeat of the long, sordid, barbaric history of treason prosecutions by British monarchs for the expressions of political, personal or trivial opinions about the Crown or the government (Henry VIII once ordered that it was treasonous to make eye contact with him in public, absent his overt invitation) is the basis for its strict constitutional definition.
The DOJ investigates criminal acts, not workplace disputes or government leaks of unclassified materials. Had the unnamed Times writer revealed classified materials, there would be a basis for a DOJ investigation, but the president's torment cannot form the basis for one. However, that does not bar the president's lawyers from conducting their own investigation, as the president is surely entitled to senior administration officials who share his goals, confidence and secrets.
You wasted everyone's time on the president's choice of vocabulary?
Post a Comment