WASHINGTON, D.C.—After House Republicans formally called for an investigation into the investigators investigating the Trump campaign, congressional Democrats quickly responded by calling for a new investigation into the investigators investigating the original investigators.
The investigation will center around claims that the investigators assigned to investigate the investigators may show significant bias, with the new investigators investigating the investigation investigators attempting to determine if there has been any prejudice or corruption in the investigation investigation.
“We now know who will investigate the investigators, but who will investigate the investigators investigating the investigators?” Senator Chuck Schumer said in a press conference. “We must hold the investigators investigating the investigation accountable if we are to retain our faith in the justice system.”
At publishing time, Republican leadership had called for a fourth investigation to investigate the investigators who were tasked with investigating the investigators assigned to investigate the investigators.
I'm sure all trump sychopbants will agree with these opinions.....the imperial presidency must be controlled by we the people not FOT's like today.... From today's failing NY Times
In the post-Watergate era, most Americans have taken for granted that a president would not fire an F.B.I. director investigating him, or replace an attorney general for insufficient loyalty to the president’s personal interests. Dangling a pardon before potential witnesses to influence their testimony? Unheard of.
Whatever one’s feelings about the end of the Mueller investigation, the Barr letter makes one thing clear: The guardrails that were established after Watergate against these types of abuses have been smashed. We still need to see the full Mueller report, but unless corrective steps are taken, Mr. Trump and Mr. Barr will have changed, perhaps profoundly, the shape of presidential power, and in troubling ways.
It’s therefore up to Congress and the 2020 presidential candidates to step in and harden the policies that for 40 years prevented improper political interference in law enforcement.
They can do this by enacting comprehensive legislation to codify rules and practices that were previously voluntary. Those who subscribe to the Barr memo view of expansive executive power might claim that such legislation would violate the Constitution. On the contrary, such legislation would help enforce it.
interesting. the NY times is now in favor of restrictions on the power of the executive branch, calling for 'guardrails' and such.
during 8 years of 0linsky, under much more egregious exercises of executive power, at best they remained silent and at worst they cheered, while captain 'pen & phone' did pretty much whatever the fuck he felt like with zero regard for the constitution.
so like CNN and MSDNC, all one can do is laugh at the NY Times anymore.
aToday at a Rose Garden ceremony belatedly celebrating the fiftieth anniversary of the inauguration of President Richard M. Nixon, President Trump said he regretted that thousands of children were still being held in custody at the U.S.-Mexican border, many without adequate medical care. “It is a tragedy, and I am totally responsible,” he said. He went on to say “I created a crisis at the border solely to fuel my base of supporters, for no reason other than my own political survival.”
After an awkward moment of silence, Mr. Trump said “I have lied again and again to the American people – about voting irregularities in the 2016 election, about the motives of my Democratic critics in Congress, and, yes, about my knowledge of and agreement to Putin’s role in helping me become president.” Wiping his eyes, Mr. Trump then commenced a string of apologies. “I apologize for criticizing the FBI and Justice Department when they were only trying to do their jobs,” he said. “I apologize for calling the press ‘enemies of the people,’” and “I apologize for criticizing judges who I disagreed with but were working honorably within our Constitutional system of checks and balances.” Mr. Trump went on to express regret for “personally profiting from my presidency, and for appointing people – including my daughter and son-in-law -- who have also profited from their offices.” He said "I should never have tried to end the Affordable Care Act, on which millions of Americans epend." Turning to foreign policy, he said “I should never have praised blood-thirsty dictators while criticizing America’s traditional friends around the world.”
Then, nearly breaking down, Mr. Trump expressed remorse “for sowing hate and division” in America.” He said “I have put cloud over this presidency and disgraced this great country, for which I will feel ashamed for the rest of my life.” He then announced he was resigning the presidency effective immediately. “I hope my decision begins a process of healing,” he said, brushing away tears. “I hope April 1, 2019 will be remembered as the day I came clean.”
I will say it again & again & again...failure to act is putting lives at risk—especially children who are exploited, pawned & in some cases ‘recycled’ by smugglers & traffickers. Bad guys know our outdated laws & they're using/re-using children as a ‘free ticket’ into America.
failure to act is putting lives at risk—especially children who are exploited, pawned & in some cases ‘recycled’ by smugglers & traffickers.
democrats know this. and just like how they love spending other people's money, they are more than happy to spend the lives of children to gain the undocumented voters they so desperately seek.
the manufactured outrage over "the children" is as phony as any other liberal rhetoric. the left is willing to pile up the dead bodies of children like fucking cordwood to get what they want.
and us on the right need to start saying so out loud.
White House whistleblower says 25 security clearance denials were reversed during Trump administration.
Treason
A White House whistleblower told lawmakers that more than two-dozen denials for security clearances have been overturned during the Trump administration, calling Congress her “last hope” for addressing what she considers improper conduct that has left the nation’s secrets exposed.
Tricia Newbold, a longtime White House security adviser, told the House Oversight and Reform Committee that she and her colleagues issued “dozens” of denials for security clearance applications that were later approved despite their concerns about blackmail, foreign influence, or other red flags, according to panel documents released Monday.
Newbold, an 18-year veteran of the security clearance process who has served under both Republican and Democratic presidents, said she warned her superiors that clearances “were not always adjudicated in the best interest of national security” — and was retaliated against for doing so.
“I would not be doing a service to myself, my country, or my children if I sat back knowing that the issues that we have could impact national security,” Newbold told the committee, according to a panel document summarizing her allegations.
Newbold added: “I feel that right now this is my last hope to really bring the integrity back into our office.”
The allegation comes during an escalating fight over the issue between House Democrats and the White House. Rep. Elijah E. Cummings (D-Md.), the committee chairman, said in a letter to the White House Counsel’s Office that his panel would vote on Tuesday to subpoena at least one individual who overruled Newbold — the committee’s first compulsory move aimed at the White House.
Cummings vowed more subpoenas would follow if the White House didn’t cooperate with his panel’s investigation.
The White House did not immediately respond to an email and a phone call seeking comment.
Tricia Newbold, a longtime White House security adviser, told the House Oversight and Reform Committee that she and her colleagues issued “dozens” of denials for security clearance applications that were later approved despite their concerns about blackmail, foreign influence, or other red flags, according to panel documents released Monday.
In the case of one top White House official, merely described as “Official 1” in committee documents, Newbold said Kline overruled her and another employee’s denial of an application amid concerns about foreign influence. But Kline, she said, “failed to address all of the disqualifying concerns listed by Ms. Newbold and the first-line adjudicator,” according to a committee summary of her response.
Newbold said another agency contacted her and demanded to know “how we rendered a favorable adjudication,” expressing concern about the clearance issued to “Official 1”
During her interview with committee staff, Ms. Newbold repeatedly made clear that her concerns are based on national security — not on personal animus towards anyone in the White House,
Newbold, an 18-year veteran of the security clearance process who has served under both Republican and Democratic presidents, said she warned her superiors that clearances “were not always adjudicated in the best interest of national security” — and was retaliated against for doing so.
Also I think her protected whistleblower status is in jepordy since she really alleges nothing improper or illegal occurred. Just a diffrence of opinion.
During her interview with committee staff, Ms. Newbold repeatedly made clear that her concerns are based on national security — not on personal animus towards anyone in the White House,
Ol Tricia Newbold better have some better evidence than what prompted the Mueller investigation.
Imagine if they used "100% fake opposition research" to deny security clearances for Americans that needed clearance. That would be nearly criminal behavior on the part of Newbold and her deep state cronies.
You keep repeating those post Roger and it is irrelevent.
The fact is she initially denied those clearances and was overruled by her superiors. In the grand scheme of things the superior officer's opinion outweighs her and if that all she has then she's no a whistleblower. She's insubordinate.
So a junior security officer was upset that her decisions were overturned by her superior officers.
And the story here is what?
none.
zero. zip. nada.
it's our "phony outrage of the day."
TDS sufferers seem to be under the delusion that what triggers them should actually matter to the rest of us here in the sane world.
oh, and the hack in question works for the office of administration. a department within OMB as a 'security administrator.'
This occupation includes positions the primary duties of which are analytical, planning, advisory, operational, or evaluative work that has as its principal purpose the development and implementation of policies, procedures, standards, training, and methods for identifying and protecting information, personnel, property, facilities, operations, or material from unauthorized disclosure, misuse, theft, assault, vandalism, espionage, sabotage, or loss. Duties involve the management, supervision, or performance of work in: (1) developing, evaluating, maintaining, and/or operating systems, policies, devices, procedures, and methods used for safeguarding information, property, personnel, operations, and materials; and/or (2) developing and implementing policies and procedures for analyzing and evaluating the character, background, and history of employees, candidates for employment, and other persons having or proposed to be granted access to classified or other sensitive information, materials, or work sites.
so she might have an opinion regarding someone's fitness for a security clearance.
that's nice.
she is hardly the final arbiter of that clearance, so this, like so much other pure bullshit coming out of the "democracy dies with apples and bananas" crowd is a pimple on a gnat's ass in terms of importance.
in other words, just enough to trigger the usual idiots around here.
Commonsense said...The fact is she initially denied those clearances and was overruled by her superiors. In the grand scheme of things the superior officer's opinion outweighs her and if that all she has then she's no a whistleblower. She's insubordinate.
Conspiracy theories have become the preeminent rationale for the justification of the President and particularly his family members getting secret Security clearances.
"Those so called "red flags" appear to be quite a bit like those "red flags" that were listed in the Steele Dossier.
If these people were using fake opposition research to deny security clearance, then the superiors were 100% correct for overruling them."
During her interview with committee staff, Ms. Newbold repeatedly made clear that her concerns are based on national security — not on personal animus towards anyone in the White House,
the hypocrisy of the biden situation is mildly amusing.
What is even more amusing ass breath is you trying to equivocate biden's behavior with the pussy grabbing whore buying imperial chief in charge!!!!! That is most amusing....!!!!!!
Don't like the term whistleblower????? Seems appropriate to me that trump should stay out of the security business with his history of hiring felons to be his limo driver.....Idiot...
Newbold told the panel that she knew her denials of security clearances could be overruled. But she was initially concerned about a lack of documentation that went into those decisions and said those were made “without memorializing the risks they were accepting.”
In the case of one top White House official, merely described as “Official 1” in committee documents, Newbold said Kline overruled her and another employee’s denial of an application amid concerns about foreign influence. But Kline, she said, “failed to address all of the disqualifying concerns listed by Ms. Newbold and the first-line adjudicator,” according to a committee summary of her response.
Newbold said another agency contacted her and demanded to know “how we rendered a favorable adjudication,” expressing concern about the clearance issued to “Official 1.”
Newbold also accused Kline of telling her to, in effect, stand down on concerns about another senior White House official, called “Official 2” by the panel. She said one of her colleagues wrote a 14-page summary of why they were planning to deny the application. But when she told Kline of her plan to agree with her colleague on the matter, Kline “instructed Ms. Newbold, ‘do not touch’ the case.”
Kline later approved the security clearance, she said.
Democrats have already identified Kline as one of the people they want to interview. In his letter to the White House, Cummings said the panel’s first subpoena would be to depose Kline, who now works for the Department of Defense.
A Pentagon spokesman declined to comment regarding Kline on Monday and referred questions to the White House.
Newbold also accused Kline of trying to get her to change her recommendation for a security clearance denial for a “high-profile official at the National Security Council,” with whom she said Kline was in daily contact on the phone.
BREAKING: House Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler will authorize a subpoena this week to obtain the full, unredacted Mueller report, and all underlying evidence. He also will authorize subpoenas for info from Steve Bannon, Don McGahn, Hope Hicks, Reince Priebus and Ann Donaldson.
i correlation i drew was with the kavanaugh travesty, making no mention of trump.
Sure you did ass breath....whatever you say is always 1000 correct and honest!!! BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!! Nothing like making excuses to protect your massive stupidity
BREAKING: House Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler will authorize a subpoena this week to obtain the full, unredacted Mueller report, and all underlying evidence.
Good luck!
Perhaps they can vote the A.G. in Contempt of Congress if he refused the subpoena?
You know, like Eric Holder and Louis Lerner?
Obviously neither Holder or Lerner are any worse for the wear for being cited, huh?
General Michael Flynn made the mistake of going against the Status Quo and the Obama status quo came after him and they got him. How? The FBI tricked him. These people will ruin your life. The first Pardon.
You want the President to investigate Eric Holder and Louis Lerner.
The DOJ even under Barr is not going to initiate any kind of investigation into the past administration. Trump isn't a dictator, they will not pursue his own personal interests.
The exact reason the country is as fucked as it is.....Assholes like all the righties here......seems facts have no bearing on what has happened....Just like GW/Climate change is a hoax and having Lil scotty state those facts have changed to russia did nothing to interfere with the election.....indictiments of the education system and trump brainwashing the weak minded assholes that support him with blind faith.....!!!!
Analysis Most Republicans don’t accept basic Mueller finding: That Russia tried to interfere in the 2016 campaign Only 4 in 10 Republicans say that an influence effort occurred, according to a new poll.
70 comments:
Latest poll....30% thinkl mueller exonerated trump....!!!!!
WASHINGTON, D.C.—After House Republicans formally called for an investigation into the investigators investigating the Trump campaign, congressional Democrats quickly responded by calling for a new investigation into the investigators investigating the original investigators.
The investigation will center around claims that the investigators assigned to investigate the investigators may show significant bias, with the new investigators investigating the investigation investigators attempting to determine if there has been any prejudice or corruption in the investigation investigation.
“We now know who will investigate the investigators, but who will investigate the investigators investigating the investigators?” Senator Chuck Schumer said in a press conference. “We must hold the investigators investigating the investigation accountable if we are to retain our faith in the justice system.”
At publishing time, Republican leadership had called for a fourth investigation to investigate the investigators who were tasked with investigating the investigators assigned to investigate the investigators.
https://babylonbee.com/news/democratic-leaders-call-for-new-investigation-to-investigate-the-investigators-investigating-the-investigators?fbclid=IwAR3nMRv6a3_TS1AbX8OjgLYIMlGjvYnj_teDSKb-W9JGcm1_iZoedf5PgIo
the alky needs to find a way to see if the bee has been lurking here and reading his comments for their material.
https://babylonbee.com/news/democratic-
About as humorous as your hemorrhoids
I'm sure all trump sychopbants will agree with these opinions.....the imperial presidency must be controlled by we the people not FOT's like today.... From today's failing NY Times
In the post-Watergate era, most Americans have taken for granted that a president would not fire an F.B.I. director investigating him, or replace an attorney general for insufficient loyalty to the president’s personal interests. Dangling a pardon before potential witnesses to influence their testimony? Unheard of.
Whatever one’s feelings about the end of the Mueller investigation, the Barr letter makes one thing clear: The guardrails that were established after Watergate against these types of abuses have been smashed. We still need to see the full Mueller report, but unless corrective steps are taken, Mr. Trump and Mr. Barr will have changed, perhaps profoundly, the shape of presidential power, and in troubling ways.
It’s therefore up to Congress and the 2020 presidential candidates to step in and harden the policies that for 40 years prevented improper political interference in law enforcement.
They can do this by enacting comprehensive legislation to codify rules and practices that were previously voluntary. Those who subscribe to the Barr memo view of expansive executive power might claim that such legislation would violate the Constitution. On the contrary, such legislation would help enforce it.
And out and out endorsement for an unaccountable, tyrannical deep-state bureaucracy.
tyrannical deep-state bureaucracy
BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!
Like CH and his alternative facts!!!!! LOLOLOL!!
interesting. the NY times is now in favor of restrictions on the power of the executive branch, calling for 'guardrails' and such.
during 8 years of 0linsky, under much more egregious exercises of executive power, at best they remained silent and at worst they cheered, while captain 'pen & phone' did pretty much whatever the fuck he felt like with zero regard for the constitution.
so like CNN and MSDNC, all one can do is laugh at the NY Times anymore.
good one denny.
And no one on the right said a peep when this occurred....
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=bush+angela+merkel+back+rub
Seems to me busch invaded her space big time.....LOLOLOLOL
interesting. the NY times is now in favor of restrictions on the power of the executive branch,
First that is not the Times opinion, but that of the authors they published....typical ass breath BS!!!!
First that is not the Times opinion, but that of the authors they published.
And yet the Times published it.
aToday at a Rose Garden ceremony belatedly celebrating the fiftieth anniversary of the inauguration of President Richard M. Nixon, President Trump said he regretted that thousands of children were still being held in custody at the U.S.-Mexican border, many without adequate medical care. “It is a tragedy, and I am totally responsible,” he said. He went on to say “I created a crisis at the border solely to fuel my base of supporters, for no reason other than my own political survival.”
After an awkward moment of silence, Mr. Trump said “I have lied again and again to the American people – about voting irregularities in the 2016 election, about the motives of my Democratic critics in Congress, and, yes, about my knowledge of and agreement to Putin’s role in helping me become president.” Wiping his eyes, Mr. Trump then commenced a string of apologies. “I apologize for criticizing the FBI and Justice Department when they were only trying to do their jobs,” he said. “I apologize for calling the press ‘enemies of the people,’” and “I apologize for criticizing judges who I disagreed with but were working honorably within our Constitutional system of checks and balances.”
Mr. Trump went on to express regret for “personally profiting from my presidency, and for appointing people – including my daughter and son-in-law -- who have also profited from their offices.” He said "I should never have tried to end the Affordable Care Act, on which millions of Americans epend." Turning to foreign policy, he said “I should never have praised blood-thirsty dictators while criticizing America’s traditional friends around the world.”
Then, nearly breaking down, Mr. Trump expressed remorse “for sowing hate and division” in America.” He said “I have put cloud over this presidency and disgraced this great country, for which I will feel ashamed for the rest of my life.” He then announced he was resigning the presidency effective immediately. “I hope my decision begins a process of healing,” he said, brushing away tears. “I hope April 1, 2019 will be remembered as the day I came clean.”
April fools
all your plagiarisms are april fools alky.
just like your marriage to mail order.
@SecNielsen
I will say it again & again & again...failure to act is putting lives at risk—especially children who are exploited, pawned & in some cases ‘recycled’ by smugglers & traffickers. Bad guys know our outdated laws & they're using/re-using children as a ‘free ticket’ into America.
not April Fools
the hypocrisy of the biden situation is mildly amusing.
during kavanaugh we wuz told to believe all the wymyn all the time, no matter what.
now? not so much.
failure to act is putting lives at risk—especially children who are exploited, pawned & in some cases ‘recycled’ by smugglers & traffickers.
democrats know this. and just like how they love spending other people's money, they are more than happy to spend the lives of children to gain the undocumented voters they so desperately seek.
the manufactured outrage over "the children" is as phony as any other liberal rhetoric. the left is willing to pile up the dead bodies of children like fucking cordwood to get what they want.
and us on the right need to start saying so out loud.
White House whistleblower says 25 security clearance denials were reversed during Trump administration.
Treason
A White House whistleblower told lawmakers that more than two-dozen denials for security clearances have been overturned during the Trump administration, calling Congress her “last hope” for addressing what she considers improper conduct that has left the nation’s secrets exposed.
Tricia Newbold, a longtime White House security adviser, told the House Oversight and Reform Committee that she and her colleagues issued “dozens” of denials for security clearance applications that were later approved despite their concerns about blackmail, foreign influence, or other red flags, according to panel documents released Monday.
Newbold, an 18-year veteran of the security clearance process who has served under both Republican and Democratic presidents, said she warned her superiors that clearances “were not always adjudicated in the best interest of national security” — and was retaliated against for doing so.
“I would not be doing a service to myself, my country, or my children if I sat back knowing that the issues that we have could impact national security,” Newbold told the committee, according to a panel document summarizing her allegations.
Newbold added: “I feel that right now this is my last hope to really bring the integrity back into our office.”
The allegation comes during an escalating fight over the issue between House Democrats and the White House. Rep. Elijah E. Cummings (D-Md.), the committee chairman, said in a letter to the White House Counsel’s Office that his panel would vote on Tuesday to subpoena at least one individual who overruled Newbold — the committee’s first compulsory move aimed at the White House.
Cummings vowed more subpoenas would follow if the White House didn’t cooperate with his panel’s investigation.
The White House did not immediately respond to an email and a phone call seeking comment.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/powerpost/white-house-whistleblower-says-security-clearance-denials-were-reversed-during-trump-administration/2019/04/01/9f28334e-542c-11e9-814f-e2f46684196e_story.html?utm_term=.7d3ab34fe383
Tricia Newbold, a longtime White House security adviser, told the House Oversight and Reform Committee that she and her colleagues issued “dozens” of denials for security clearance applications that were later approved despite their concerns about blackmail, foreign influence, or other red flags, according to panel documents released Monday.
Robert Reich
Pussy grabbing was perfectly acceptable.
In the case of one top White House official, merely described as “Official 1” in committee documents, Newbold said Kline overruled her and another employee’s denial of an application amid concerns about foreign influence. But Kline, she said, “failed to address all of the disqualifying concerns listed by Ms. Newbold and the first-line adjudicator,” according to a committee summary of her response.
Newbold said another agency contacted her and demanded to know “how we rendered a favorable adjudication,” expressing concern about the clearance issued to “Official 1”
@PrisonPlanet
Kellyanne Conway tells people to Google 'Creepy Uncle Joe'.
So a junior security officer was upset that her decisions were overturned by her superior officers.
And the story here is what?
My guess is that if she was overruled that often, she wasn't very good to begin with.
Esepecially so since she thinks her opinion outweighs that of her bosses.
During her interview with committee staff, Ms. Newbold repeatedly made clear that her concerns are based on national security — not on personal animus towards anyone in the White House,
@MarkDice
Congressman Eric Swalwell spent the entire weekend watching pee pee tapes online in hopes of spotting President Trump in one.
Newbold, an 18-year veteran of the security clearance process who has served under both Republican and Democratic presidents, said she warned her superiors that clearances “were not always adjudicated in the best interest of national security” — and was retaliated against for doing so.
Also I think her protected whistleblower status is in jepordy since she really alleges nothing improper or illegal occurred. Just a diffrence of opinion.
During her interview with committee staff, Ms. Newbold repeatedly made clear that her concerns are based on national security — not on personal animus towards anyone in the White House,
Newbold, an 18-year veteran of the security clearance process who has served under both Republican and Democratic presidents.
Well Rog....
Ol Tricia Newbold better have some better evidence than what prompted the Mueller investigation.
Imagine if they used "100% fake opposition research" to deny security clearances for Americans that needed clearance. That would be nearly criminal behavior on the part of Newbold and her deep state cronies.
Newbold, an 18-year veteran of the security clearance process who has served under both Republican and Democratic presidents.
Decisions by individual 1 “were not always adjudicated in the best interest of national security”
@RedPilledChica
A minor can get an abortion in 14 states (and in DC) without parental consent but cannot see the @UnplannedMovie.
THAT IS SICK and SO WRONG.
You keep repeating those post Roger and it is irrelevent.
The fact is she initially denied those clearances and was overruled by her superiors. In the grand scheme of things the superior officer's opinion outweighs her and if that all she has then she's no a whistleblower. She's insubordinate.
Newbold, an 18-year veteran of the security clearance process who has served under both Republican and Democratic presidents.
Decisions by individual 1 “were not always adjudicated in the best interest of national security”
Is just another one of her deep state cronies.
You are one sick boy.
Uh-oh. I think we've been punked. I forgot it was April 1.
Newbold, an 18-year veteran of the security clearance process who has served under both Republican and Democratic presidents.
Decisions by individual 1 “were not always adjudicated in the best interest of national security”
she's no a whistleblower. She's insubordinate and she's no a whistleblower. She Is just another one of her deep state cronies.
Sick ponies
Commonsense said...
So a junior security officer was upset that her decisions were overturned by her superior officers.
And the story here is what?
none.
zero. zip. nada.
it's our "phony outrage of the day."
TDS sufferers seem to be under the delusion that what triggers them should actually matter to the rest of us here in the sane world.
oh, and the hack in question works for the office of administration. a department within OMB as a 'security administrator.'
This occupation includes positions the primary duties of which are analytical, planning, advisory, operational, or evaluative work that has as its principal purpose the development and implementation of policies, procedures, standards, training, and methods for identifying and protecting information, personnel, property, facilities, operations, or material from unauthorized disclosure, misuse, theft, assault, vandalism, espionage, sabotage, or loss. Duties involve the management, supervision, or performance of work in: (1) developing, evaluating, maintaining, and/or operating systems, policies, devices, procedures, and methods used for safeguarding information, property, personnel, operations, and materials; and/or (2) developing and implementing policies and procedures for analyzing and evaluating the character, background, and history of employees, candidates for employment, and other persons having or proposed to be granted access to classified or other sensitive information, materials, or work sites.
https://www.federalpay.org/employees/occupations/security-administration/2017
so she might have an opinion regarding someone's fitness for a security clearance.
that's nice.
she is hardly the final arbiter of that clearance, so this, like so much other pure bullshit coming out of the "democracy dies with apples and bananas" crowd is a pimple on a gnat's ass in terms of importance.
in other words, just enough to trigger the usual idiots around here.
\
Commonsense said...The fact is she initially denied those clearances and was overruled by her superiors. In the grand scheme of things the superior officer's opinion outweighs her and if that all she has then she's no a whistleblower. She's insubordinate.
WINNER, Post of the Day
Well Roger...
Those so called "red flags" appear to be quite a bit like those "red flags" that were listed in the Steele Dossier.
If these people were using fake opposition research to deny security clearance, then the superiors were 100% correct for overruling them.
the only thing the bozo's post did right with the newbold outrage was to post it on april fools day. exactly where it belongs.
oh, and i see she got mumbles cummings to fall for her hoax.
LOL.
perfect.
that dumb fuck probably can't visit the rest room unassisted.
Conspiracy theories have become the preeminent rationale for the justification of the President and particularly his family members getting secret Security clearances.
"Those so called "red flags" appear to be quite a bit like those "red flags" that were listed in the Steele Dossier.
If these people were using fake opposition research to deny security clearance, then the superiors were 100% correct for overruling them."
During her interview with committee staff, Ms. Newbold repeatedly made clear that her concerns are based on national security — not on personal animus towards anyone in the White House,
Ya, sure.
the bozo's post's "bombshell" makes obvious the fact that newbold is cummings' rat inside the white house for his little fishing trip.
so yeah... april fools day was the perfect day to post this.
this is all about mumbles trying to look tough and exert some authority to his constituents back in the ghetto's of baltimore.
LOL.
the hypocrisy of the biden situation is mildly amusing.
What is even more amusing ass breath is you trying to equivocate biden's behavior with the pussy grabbing whore buying imperial chief in charge!!!!! That is most amusing....!!!!!!
not on personal animus towards anyone in the White House,
Unlike the immature idiot in chief who makes everything personal Idiot..
Donald Trump is an extremely capable, highly respected world leader. He's highly educated, great memory, knows wind and big words.
Loser, Post of the Day
Don't like the term whistleblower????? Seems appropriate to me that trump should stay out of the security business with his history of hiring felons to be his limo driver.....Idiot...
my God it's no wonder mail order left, he's gone completely insane
https://www.washingtonpost.com/powerpost/white-house-whistleblower-says-security-clearance-denials-were-reversed-during-trump-administration/2019/04/01/9f28334e-542c-11e9-814f-e2f46684196e_story.html?utm_term=.e3416876f9d4
Newbold told the panel that she knew her denials of security clearances could be overruled. But she was initially concerned about a lack of documentation that went into those decisions and said those were made “without memorializing the risks they were accepting.”
In the case of one top White House official, merely described as “Official 1” in committee documents, Newbold said Kline overruled her and another employee’s denial of an application amid concerns about foreign influence. But Kline, she said, “failed to address all of the disqualifying concerns listed by Ms. Newbold and the first-line adjudicator,” according to a committee summary of her response.
Newbold said another agency contacted her and demanded to know “how we rendered a favorable adjudication,” expressing concern about the clearance issued to “Official 1.”
Newbold also accused Kline of telling her to, in effect, stand down on concerns about another senior White House official, called “Official 2” by the panel. She said one of her colleagues wrote a 14-page summary of why they were planning to deny the application. But when she told Kline of her plan to agree with her colleague on the matter, Kline “instructed Ms. Newbold, ‘do not touch’ the case.”
Kline later approved the security clearance, she said.
Democrats have already identified Kline as one of the people they want to interview. In his letter to the White House, Cummings said the panel’s first subpoena would be to depose Kline, who now works for the Department of Defense.
A Pentagon spokesman declined to comment regarding Kline on Monday and referred questions to the White House.
Newbold also accused Kline of trying to get her to change her recommendation for a security clearance denial for a “high-profile official at the National Security Council,” with whom she said Kline was in daily contact on the phone.
What is even more amusing ass breath is you trying to equivocate biden's behavior with the pussy grabbing whore buying imperial chief in charge!!!!!
particularly because i didn't. i correlation i drew was with the kavanaugh travesty, making no mention of trump.
denny, i'm convinced your presence on this blog is only to make the alky look smart as he works his way through his various trump trigger spasms.
Vagina Neck Trump T-shirts should be available tomorrow!
Mail order
Came to the United States in 1970.
Came to the United States in 1970.
and bounced your psycho ass out in 2019.
These were not victimless crimes. Smollett’s staged “MAGA hat” attack was a calculated slander against every American who voted for Donald Trump. I wasn’t one of those voters, but they number some 63 million. What Jussie Smollett was trying to do with that phony 2 a.m. attack in the street and his fake anthrax letter was stir up animosity against every one of them. Let’s be blunt: He was trying to foment racial unrest in this country. One can only assume he’d have been pleased if some actual MAGA hat wearers were physically attacked in retaliation. Those are his hate crimes. They certainly seem worthy of some jail time, if only as a deterrent.
The third hoax -- the dropping of charges against this man for no reason that makes sense under the law -- assures that the malicious seeds Smollett planted will linger and take root. Millions of people will believe him. “The charges were dropped,” they’ll say, and they won’t be wrong. This, too, is a kind of hate crime, this one committed under color of law by elected officials.
Shortly after Donald Trump’s election as president, the venerable Washington Post adopted as its mantra “Democracy Dies in Darkness.” Some Trump supporters chafed at this slogan, seeing it as a subtle dig at their guy. Maybe it is, but the newspaper’s sentiment is undeniably true. In Chicago, democracy also dies in the daylight. In the middle of the morning, in open court.
BREAKING: House Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler will authorize a subpoena this week to obtain the full, unredacted Mueller report, and all underlying evidence. He also will authorize subpoenas for info from Steve Bannon, Don McGahn, Hope Hicks, Reince Priebus and Ann Donaldson.
I'm still here!
i correlation i drew was with the kavanaugh travesty, making no mention of trump.
Sure you did ass breath....whatever you say is always 1000 correct and honest!!! BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!! Nothing like making excuses to protect your massive stupidity
Sure you did ass breath.
not true, shitstain -
rrb said...
the hypocrisy of the biden situation is mildly amusing.
during kavanaugh we wuz told to believe all the wymyn all the time, no matter what.
now? not so much.
April 1, 2019 at 9:05 AM Delete
not true, shitstain -
Whatever you say ass breath...BWAAAAAAAA!!!!! Stupidity the bedrock of ass breath!!!
@Doc_0
April 1 falling on Friday would produce an afternoon document dump of apocalyptic proportions.
BREAKING: House Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler will authorize a subpoena this week to obtain the full, unredacted Mueller report, and all underlying evidence.
Good luck!
Perhaps they can vote the A.G. in Contempt of Congress if he refused the subpoena?
You know, like Eric Holder and Louis Lerner?
Obviously neither Holder or Lerner are any worse for the wear for being cited, huh?
lo iq Unknown said...
not true, shitstain -
Whatever you say ass breath...BWAAAAAAAA!!!!! Stupidity the bedrock of ass breath!!
See lo iq is on the case again and has his nose up any possible lead.
all day long.
ROFLMFAO !!!
@chuckwoolery
General Michael Flynn made the mistake of going against the Status Quo and the Obama status quo came after him and they got him. How? The FBI tricked him. These people will ruin your life. The first Pardon.
You want the President to investigate Eric Holder and Louis Lerner.
The DOJ even under Barr is not going to initiate any kind of investigation into the past administration. Trump isn't a dictator, they will not pursue his own personal interests.
caliphate4vrApril 1, 2019 at 10:11 AM
my God it's no wonder mail order left, he's gone completely insane. Exactly, she kicked him out of her home and took half of Halfbaked income.
Former High Ranking Official of The Lost Years President , provides cover to Democrats.
He stated that the status at the boarder is a ctisis.
Why did he come out?
Anonymous Chuck Woolery said...
@chuckwoolery
BWAAAAAAAAA!!!!! Tame show host being quote by a CH asshole as an expert!!!!!!! About as funny as ass breath being an expert at punditry!!!!!
The exact reason the country is as fucked as it is.....Assholes like all the righties here......seems facts have no bearing on what has happened....Just like GW/Climate change is a hoax and having Lil scotty state those facts have changed to russia did nothing to interfere with the election.....indictiments of the education system and trump brainwashing the weak minded assholes that support him with blind faith.....!!!!
Analysis
Most Republicans don’t accept basic Mueller finding: That Russia tried to interfere in the 2016 campaign
Only 4 in 10 Republicans say that an influence effort occurred, according to a new poll.
lo iq Unknown said...
not true, shitstain -
Whatever you say ass breath...BWAAAAAAAA!!!!! Stupidity the bedrock of ass breath!!
See lo iq is on the case again and has his nose up any possible lead.
all day long. Put Chuck Woolery up just for him, knew he'd sniff him out. And even he's way above lo iq.
ROFLMFAO !!!
Post a Comment