 |
| No conspiracy, no coordination, no obstruction, no bullshit! |
“How did we get to the point where the evidence is now that the president was falsely accused of colluding with the Russians, accused of being treasonous and accused of being a Russian agent, and the evidence now is that that was without a basis?” he asked. “And two years of his administration have been dominated by allegations that have now been proven false. But to listen to some of the rhetoric, you would think the Mueller report had found the opposite.”
To be clear, William Barr was pretty unflappable during his Senate hearing. But certainly the same cannot be said about the clearly nutso, over-the-top, deranged group of nut-jobs formerly called Democratic Senators. It was painful to watch Democrat after Democrat try to outdo each other as to the degree they could be disrespectful to the Attorney General. No question, Hirono won that battle hands down. She spent 4:55 out of her 5:00 time splot calling Barr names, demeaning his character, and demanding he resign. The last five seconds was used to scream out her one insulting question.
But I will provide that Kamala Harris and Cory Booker were at least honorable mentions, for no other reason than they were able to simultaneously talk, interrupt, and smirk all at the same time. I vaguely remember that Harris believed that Barr didn't do enough evaluating before drawing his conclusion, and Booker asked approximately 50 question and allowed 0.4 of second on average for Barr to answer before interrupting.
All in all it was good political theater. I mean where else can you see a bunch of adults feint utter destain because they had to wait two weeks for a report that they were never technically entitled to in the first place. Yeah, we had four separate investigations spanning two and half years, costing millions and millions of dollars, and they are having a cow because they wanted to see summary reports a few days earlier than they would have otherwise seen the entire report.
I have to actually think to myself. Is that actually true? Did what I am writing "actually" just happen, or am I in one of those really strange dreams? Did I really watch United States Senators (full grown adults) have complete meltdowns over the timing of the release of a report that they were not actually even entitled to?
Did I?
109 comments:
The Democrat meltdown was historic.
Barr was accused of hiding things that were in the report that has been released for two weeks.
Then Harris accused him of not reviewing all the evidence, all 1.4 million documents sent over by the Trump administration alone.
If he did that we would be here until the Ivanka Trump administration.
Truly God put Democrat senators on earth so everybody can understand the definition of stupid.
Keep slurping truthers....Barr is another abhorrent trump defender who lies just as good as donnie...His statement that the POTUS can stop any investigation that he feels unfounded should give everyone pause....but, not Lil Scotty who never misses a trump slurp....sad very sad... Amazing he did not recall the sharing of data with russians....kinda makes me feel that not only did he not look at the evidence....he did not read the report either...,. Didn't he say the evidence did not support obstruction????? Without reviewing it, how can he make that statement....??? And you will keep slurping.....
William Barr exposed the rampant desperation of Trump’s foes
It was politics at its most dishonest as they tried to argue that up is down and black is white. Barr was mostly stoic, but allowed himself a brief moment to brilliantly summarize the outlandish effort to twist reality.
“How did we get to the point where the evidence is now that the president was falsely accused of colluding with the Russians, accused of being treasonous and accused of being a Russian agent, and the evidence now is that that was without a basis?” he asked. “And two years of his administration have been dominated by allegations that have now been proven false. But to listen to some of the rhetoric, you would think the Mueller report had found the opposite.”
No better, more concise statement has been made about the bankrupt nature of the Democratic Party and its leaders. They bet everything on Mueller validating their Big Lie of Russia, Russia, Russia, and now they have nothing.
Their threats of impeachment are hollow and their resistance movement is breaking into factions about how much socialism they should offer to voters in 2020.
Party voters should direct their fury at leaders who led them to this bitter dead end.
The nation will soon forget the bad political theater, especially with another development moving toward center stage as Barr promised again to investigate the conduct of law enforcement and the intelligence agencies during and after the 2016 campaign, including the massive numbers of leaks.
At one point, he talked of possible “overreach” by top officials, then added: “But what we have to be concerned about is a few people at the top getting into their heads that they know better than the American people.”
At another point, he said, “We have to stop using the criminal justice process as a political weapon.”
The references are unmistakable and the strongest sign yet that Barr suspects wrongdoing in very high places. It’s also a sign that the worm is turning.
Dems got the special counsel investigation they demanded and were able to play offense against Trump since 2016. Now the focus shifts to the other side of the story — the plot to steal the election and then undermine a duly elected president.
Finally, we are getting to the history that matters most.
This happened quickly.
Democrats move to Impeach AG Barr.
Ok, go for it.
Nixon
"Well, when the president does it, that means that it is not illegal."
William Barr.
If an investigation is “based on false allegations, the president does not have to sit there constitutionally and allow it to run its course,”
The only remedy for the actions of the President, is defeat at the polls, or impeachment.
If the same standards apply to the office of the President, he or she can do anything he wants going forward.
In effect the President is above the law and can do anything without any restrictions at all.
This isn't a partisan issue. Do we in effect, elect a dictator?
If in November of 2020 and the Democrats have control of the Congress and the Presidency, will you stand behind what you are supporting today, Scott?
It will be yet another Bad week for the Socialist Democrats when the Inspector General Report comes out , maybe as soon as next week.
Or is the Inspector General in bed with Pres. Trump too?
Roger your statements are fake, faulty and idiocy.
Take a breath, a deep one and try again with 99 % less Maddow.
In news that matter.
"AUSCHWITZ — The first-ever U.S. government delegation to the March of the Living annual Holocaust memorial arrived at Auschwitz on a somber Thursday morning, bringing several ambassadors and envoys in a show of solidarity against antisemitism.
“I couldn’t be more proud of the unprecedented commitment of this administration to fight against antisemitism,” U.S. Special Envoy to Combat and Monitor Antisemitism, Elan Carr, told reporters outside the infamous concentration camp."
Why didn't Obama do this?
“Attorney General Barr, has the president or anyone at the White House ever asked or suggested that you open an investigation of anyone?” Harris began. “Yes or no?”
“Could you repeat the question?”
He ducked and covered.
Should the President have the authority to instigate an investigation into his opposition candidate, just because he wants to do it, regardless of the presumption of innocence or just for revenge?
William Barr exposed the rampant desperation of Trump’s foes
The most BULLSHIT opinion piece I have ever seen....And cramps posts it as his own....sad his head is stuck sooooo far up his own ass.....!!!!
Why didn't Obama do this?
Why don't you ask him? Goat fucking idiot....!!!
No need goat fucker...Obama instead addressed the Israeli's instead....
Obama Holocaust Rememberance Day 2016
www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/obama-holocaust-rememberance-day-2016
On January 27, 2016, Barack Obama became the first U.S. President to address a forum at the Israeli embassy in Washington, on International Holocaust Rememberance Day, and the 71 st anniversary of the liberation of Auschwitz-Birkenau. Please find the text of President Obama's statement below.
Socialist Democrats controlling labor and services.
"Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-WA) said Tuesday that one million private health insurance workers will get “displaced” under Medicare for All.
At a town hall at American University on Tuesday, Jayapal said that one million private health insurance workers will lose their jobs as a result of her progressive single-payer, government-run healthcare proposal."
Medicaid for All.
These are my words and my thoughts and quotes.
If the President decides that any investigation into his actions as President are “based on false allegations, the president does not have to sit there constitutionally and allow it to run its course,” what are the limits upon the President?
Scott, you will not answer the question.
Indy, and wp and several other moderate Democrats, like myself believe that I might as well try to reason with a brick wall.
If the President decides that any investigation into his actions as President are “based on false allegations, the president does not have to sit there constitutionally and allow it to run its course,” what are the limits upon the President?
I think Barr made the point well enough, Roger.
This was always a witch hunt. Mueller probably knew when he took over the case that it was a witch hunt. Obviously others in the FBI knew it was a witch hunt.
No American citizen should be bullied into "silence" by our law enforcement community, especially when they are skirting the issues of ethical and legal behavior. Every American has the right to fight back against allegations.
In fact, four of our Amendments in the Bill of Rights are in regards to protections for people accused of crimes. We take innocent until proven guilty, assumption of innocence, due process, and keeping our law enforcement from using their enormous weight to ruin people over political or personal reasons.
Remove the President from the equation for a moment Roger. If these issues no longer appear important to you, then ask yourself why you suddenly because a brown shirt who applauds abusive and dishonest behavior from the very highest level of our law enforcement?
I think Barr made the point well enough, Roger.
Spoken like a tyrant Lil Scotty...Instead, you and Barr ignore the law like Nixon....and what happened to him?????? BWAAAAAAAAA!!!! Kinda like the word spying that you and barr embrace ignoring the context of approved surveillance that followed the letter of the law in spite of your biased opinion....
"Should the President have the authority to instigate an investigation into his opposition candidate, just because he wants to do it, regardless of the presumption of innocence or just for revenge?"
President Obama and Vice president Joe answered that question with a strong "YES"
Next......
President Obama and Vice president Joe answered that question with a strong "YES"
Another lie from the goat fucking asswipe of kansas.....Stupidity is your middle name!!!!!!
Nixon
"Well, when the president does it, that means that it is not illegal."
William Barr.
If an investigation is “based on false allegations, the president does not have to sit there constitutionally and allow it to run its course,”
The only remedy for the actions of the President, is defeat at the polls, or impeachment?
If this stands, we are in effect, going to elect a dictator. I don't believe that this is a partisan issue. The founding fathers feared that the President would assume ultimate power. If President Hillary Rodham Clinton, was taking the same sh*t I would be very nervous too. The executive branch has been expanding its authority for most of our history. We have been engaged in multiple wars since December 7th 1941. Not once has the legislature declared war.
We might be facing the most important period of time since the civil war.
Well Denny...
The difference is that Nixon was actually guilty of a crime.
In this case our FBI, DOJ, and Special Counsel will fooled by simpleton Russian disinformation provided to the DNC and Hillary camps. They were fooled much like a small child is fooled and amazed by how the amature magician found a quarter behind their ear.
How did you do that!?!?!?
So they are either some of the dumbest fucks on the planet, or some of the most corrupt, or quite possibly a little bit of both.
But what we know at this point is that nothing in the "Dossier" was true. It was Russian disinformation designed to sow discord, and all it needed were people desperate and gullible enough to believe it... and corrupt enough to act on it.
Those desperate, gullible, corrupt people included James Comey, Andrew McCabe, Peter Strzok, Democrats in congress, Robert Mueller and apparently most of the Mueller staff.
Now all you have to whine about is the timing of how the exonerating report was released. Think about it. From a grand conspiracy between rival superpowers to a grand conspiracy of wanting to put out a report in it's entirety rather than by piecemeal.
And now Democrats want to "impeach" Barr over how a report was released? My how the not-so-mighty have fallen into the area of absolute pettiness.
The difference is that Nixon was actually guilty of a crime.
BWAAAAA!!!!! You are s moron Lil Scotty .......Was the country aware of his guilt when he was fucking around with the Law???? You seemed to have jumped the gun on the guilty, typical of low intellect R's like yourself,,,,,,BTW I stopped reading your bullshit screed right after the first sentence....not worth the electrons to transmit it....keep slurping!!!
You just don't fucking get it.
If the President believes that any investigation into his actions is a witch hunt, there are absolutely no restrictions upon his actions. NONE.
I might as well try to reason with a brick wall.
I will not Remove the President from the equation! He is the President and head of the executive branch of government.
You are allowing HIM to declare any investigation into his actions are a Witch Hunt, and he alone can terminate any investigationi as President.
You support his decision to ignore any subpoenas for his staff to appear in congressional hearings! Why?
He believes that this is a Witch Hunt!
Your a brick wall.
Blah blah blah
Well Denny... you sort of lost the public on impeachment suddenly. Apparently people were willing to impeach if they thought the President was engaged in a conspiracy with a foreign power.
But apparently the whole wishy washy not sure exactly but he might have if we just define it so could have but I won't say for sure whether or not he may or may not have been obstructive, but I don't want to call it a crime exactly.
Just doesn't cut it.
This is why that democracies are fragile.
We have the longest organized democratic republic in history.
Donald Trump is the greatest risk since 1861.
Well Roger...
If you repeat the same mantra another 1000 times, you might just convince yourself that it's true. The rest of us live in the real world.
You know, where we just watched opposition research made up of obvious Russian disinformation all incompetent and/or corrupt law enforcement officials engage in an endless priceless investigation...
That at the end of the day ended up telling us nothing we didn't already know, cause a whole ton of confusion... and got so called "adult" Senators to have a complete and total mental breakdown over the fucking "timing" and "scope" of the release of a Report that everyone has now had for weeks.
You might be right about the fragility of our government. But it isn't Trump who is fragile or is going to bring us down. It's those who are besides themselves with emotional anguish to the point that they cannot think straight who might.
They work for the President.
"New Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) said Tuesday that President-elect Donald Trump is "being really dumb" by taking on the intelligence community and its assessments on Russia's cyber activities.
"Let me tell you, you take on the intelligence community, they have six ways from Sunday at getting back at you," Schumer told MSNBC's Rachel Maddow.
"So even for a practical, supposedly hard-nosed businessman, he's being really dumb to do this."
The results of the investigation, isn't the issue Scott.
If any President believes that any investigation into his actions is a witch hunt, there are absolutely no restrictions upon his actions. NONE.
Including the termination of the investigation.
Barr said that the President is above the law.
If we elect the most liberal Democrat candidate, and initiates an executive order, that you oppose, will be writing 500 word diatribes declaring the President has violated the law and should be impeached.
I'm not wearing a partisan hat. I'm a patriot who believes that the Constitution does not grant the President without regards to the law.
You do support the President is above the law and the Constitution, if he or she declares a Witch Hunt.
I am right about the fragility of our government. Because it is Trump has declared himself above the law.
It's those who are besides themselves believe that this President can decide whether he says or does is above the law, who emotionally ignore reality for partisan reasons.
Like you. The Brick Wall.
When you are a humorless old broken bitter loser.
"Hillary Clinton
✔@HillaryClinton
Seriously, you asked Russia to hack me on national television."
😂😁🤣😁😂🤣😃😀😄
The rest of us live in the real world.
This is not the real world. It's a partisan Witch Hunt and therefore illegitimate and he can do anything without regards to the law.
You know, where we just watched opposition research made up of obvious Russian disinformation all incompetent and/or corrupt law enforcement officials engage in an endless priceless investigation...
The Brick Wall. The party line.
You are repeating what he told you to say.
Roger , I will credit you with one thing. When you are wrong, you are spectacularly so.
Biden said of China. “I mean, you know, they’re not bad folks, folks. But guess what? They’re not competition for us.”
Oh Joe. Stop.
If any President believes that any investigation into his actions is a witch hunt, there are absolutely no restrictions upon his actions. NONE.
Why would you say that Roger?
Sort of dumb opinion to have.
I would rather go with what the Attorney General said about it. You cannot take away a President's right to be President just because he is under investigation. He can still fire people who need to be fired. He can still make the same constitutional acts that Presidents are allowed to take.
And yes, the President can defend himself to the media, he can defend himself on Twitter, he can say good things and bad things about people within the investigation. A President is no different than any other American, and he has the same rights as any other person.
The problem here is with the 10 items Mueller's report cites to be possible "obstruction". Almost all of them dealt with the President attempting to defend himself in the media. Whether that is criticizing a witness he felt wasn't telling the truth, or asking key people (like McGahn) to dispute media stories that were technically untrue. These are things he has a right to do...
Even more so, because we all know now that he was never guilty (not even remotely so) of any of these allegations pushed on him for the past two years.
Comey knew the truth. He told the truth to Trump. But wouldn't tell the public. Mueller knew the truth. Probably within a few days of taking over the investigation. Yet he let everyone continue to believe that the President was in trouble for 22 months while he chased process crimes and investigated "obstruction".
The reality... is that we would have been much better off if Sessions would not have recused himself. We could have listened to Comey say under oath that there was no evidence of collusion and that the President was never under investigation... we could have accepted the Senate and House investigations... and left it at that.
Then spend the 22 months and $30 million dollars on a task force of people who didn't chase their legal tails around in circles... but instead did something like figure out how to protect ourselves from future attacks on our elections.
That would have made sense, Roger.
The President was correct to offer that as an alternative.
In retrospect, I don't know how you could possibly disagree with that.
Barr admitted he had never even reviewed the underlying evidence of the Mueller report, and he refused to say whether the President has ever ordered him to investigate anyone.
My niece nailed it.
It was very frightening to see Barr act like Trump's personal lawyer and not the Attorney General of the United States when he went before the Senate Judiciary Committee yesterday.
Just as frightening was seeing the GOP Senators provide cover, especially Committee Chairman, Sen. Graham.
No President is a king. No one is above the law. As I've stated previously, Presidential powers must be held in check by the Congress & the courts. It's a delicate balance that has tipped towards the Exec. Branch for too long.
Congress needs to pull its collective head out of its ass and put country before party and put a stop to Trump's obstruction.
The GOP needs to stop galloping towards authoritarianism.
Go back to 2016 and see what Senator Graham said about Trump!
The Democrats and the news media lied to the American people for 2 1/2 years.
They may pay a steep price for that in 2020. (CNN is already paying a steep price.)
Nice dodge.
He's above the law and you don't care.
He has done nothing I regards to figure out how to protect ourselves from future attacks on our elections.
His staff has told people to never talk about how to protect ourselves from future attacks on our elections.
Your not worried about him being above the law.
Brick wall syndrome.
Barr admitted he had never even reviewed the underlying evidence of the Mueller report
So you want Barr to review all 1.4 million documents for what exactly?
And of that was Barr's job what do we need a special council with 19 lawyers and 40 FBI investigators for ?
You really are moronic.
Do you even considered the utter absurdity of your talking points before you parrot them?
Roger Amick said... The Brick Wall. The party line.
You are repeating what he told you to say.
What should concern all Americans is how the exact words of the Daily DNC talking reports are repeated by every left wing media outlet.
For instance yesterday "the presidents handpicked attorney general". I saw a montage of that. Every attorney general is hand picked by the president and always has been. Why is every news outlet injecting the exact same wording of something so non-important?
The DNC talking points told them. And it is now happening daily.
Chilling.
It is heartening that FAKE NEWS is finally taking it on the chin. And that justice is coming. Though the TDS affected can't see it for the life of them.
I can't wait for the Trump Ads on this topic of the Socialist Stooges and their lap dog media lying .
Oh, and US Productivity is up strongly.
Roger, where is that inflation you said was coming?
An investigation into the investigation.
He will declare it is fair.
Seig Heil Scott
@paulsperry_
BREAKING: Hillary Clinton tonight on MSNBC suggested Democratic presidential candidates call on China to interfere in the 2020 election and even hack into the IRS and release President Trump's tax returns
You don't think those who subvert democratic institutions should be investigated Roger?
Attempting to overthrow a presidential election is kind of serious don't you think?
Cowardly King Obama
The only thoughts broke Roger has he stole.
The only thoughts broke Roger has he stole.
And the only post you make goat fucker are absurd beyond stupid!!!!!
March 5: Mueller meets with Barr and tells him that the introduction and executive summaries of his report “accurately summarize this Office’s work and conclusions.”
March 24, early afternoon: Mueller reiterates his position that the introduction and executive summaries of his report are accurate
March 24, late afternoon: Barr releases his own summary of the Mueller report.
March 25, morning: Mueller tells Barr his summary “did not fully capture the context, nature, and substance of this office’s work and conclusions.”
March 25, afternoon: Mueller sends redacted versions of the introduction and executive summaries to Barr and asks that they be released.
March 27: Mueller sends a memo to Barr saying once again that he would like the introduction and executive summaries to be publicly released. The redaction process for the full report “need not delay” this, he says, and “release at this time would alleviate the misunderstandings that have arisen.”
May 1st. The letter was snippy and from a member of his staff.
We don't have any way to overthrow an election.
Mike Pence would be President if Trump was impeached and convicted.
Your comment is absurd.
Anonymous Paul Sperry said...
@paulsperry_
BREAKING: Hillary Clinton tonight on MSNBC suggested Democratic
The goat fucking asshole provides more humorous bot spam from people who don't exist....like his swiss cheese brain!!!!! BRAAAAAAAA!!!!!!
t. The letter was sniTTy
Exactly like LIL Scotty and his holier than thou bullshit opinion screeds......LOLOLOLOL
Blogger C.H. Truth said...
Blah blah blah
Isa that your learned law opinion Lil Scotty.....claiming nixon was proven guilty prior to any investigation or findings....Too stupid even for you, lil boy!!!!
Barr admitted he had never even reviewed the underlying evidence of the Mueller report
What Barr said was that they used the exact same procedure that they use for all decisions regarding whether to charge someone. The idea isn't that an A.G. or D.A.G. is going to filter through all of the underlying evidence that was used for an investigator to garner a summary or recommendation.
As Barr said, it is standard procedure to assume that the people who work for you (in this case Mueller and his team) were accurately relating the underlying work that was done to come to his 10 items in his report.
The idea that an Attorney General (or any District Attorney) is going to go back to the law enforcement, dig up all of the evidence, spend the same amount of time that the original investigators did to rehash the investigation... is preposterous.
bottom line: if you really wanted Barr and Rosenstein to evaluate everything, then there would have been no need for Mueller to write any report. In fact, Mueller's report (by those standards) is irrelevant and unnecessary and should be completely ignored, because the A.G. or D.A.G. didn't go back through every little detail and confirm it.
It's called being in upper management. They made decisions based on the summary positions presented to them by people who did the bulk of the work to summarize. The CEO of a company cannot rehash the underlying information for every decision or he would never make any decisions.
It was a question designed to do exactly what it did. Provide a talking point for the gullible.
@TimRunsHisMouth
Mazie Hirono:
BELIEVED Michael Avenatti's allegations of teenage gang rape parties against Brett Kavanaugh
DOESN'T BELIEVE the results of the Mueller Investigation.
Do you realize that most of the (R)Senators called for an investigation into Crooked Hillary Clinton?
I firmly disagree with that.
I don't know how much you studied history. Dictators often attempt to imprison of assault their opponents and their families.
He's deeply concerned about his place in history, because he will be seen as illegitimate because of the Russians hack into the election.
He has done nothing I regards to figure out how to protect ourselves from future attacks on our elections.
We just spent the last 22 months and $30 million chasing a figment of Russia's imagination. Because people like you STILL CANNOT LET GO!
Comey testifies no evidence of conspiracy.
Comey testifies Trump not a suspect of any crime.
You won't accept it.
House intelligence find no evidence of conspiracy
House intelligence find no crime by the President
You won't accept it
Senate intelligence find no evidence of conspiracy
Senate intelligence find no crime by the President
You still won't accept it
Robert Mueller and his team spend 22 months and $30 million
find no evidence of conspiracy with Russians
find no crime by the President regarding Russians
And you STILL WON'T FUCKIGN ACCEPT IT
You are a sick old man in denial.
Another example of a typical trump follower as he courts the likes of david duke, the KKK and MAGA hat wearers....and you all just sit around here all day and espouse the trump holiness and support the killing in the name of god and hitler,.,,,,,sooooo sad...
n Tuesday. (Pool/Reuters)
By Julie Zauzmer May 1 at 1:59 PM
Before he allegedly walked into a synagogue in Poway, Calif., and opened fire, John Earnest appears to have written a seven-page letter spelling out his core beliefs: that Jewish people, guilty in his view of faults ranging from killing Jesus to controlling the media, deserved to die. That his intention to kill Jews would glorify God.
Days later, the Rev. Mika Edmondson read those words and was stunned. “It certainly calls for a good amount of soul-searching,” said Edmondson, a pastor in the Orthodox Presbyterian Church, a small evangelical denomination founded to counter liberalism in mainline Presbyterianism. Earnest, 19, was a member of an OPC congregation. His father was an elder. He attended regularly. And in the manifesto, the writer spewed not only invective against Jews and racial minorities but also cogent Christian theology he heard in the pews.
Dictators often attempt to imprison of assault their opponents and their families.
You mean like how Obama and his executive branch went after Trump, his inner circle, his family, and everyone around him?
We just spent the last 22 months and $30 million chasing a figment of Russia's imagination
There was no imagination except You and Barr forgetting about the polling data served to the russians that was part of the mueller witch hunt report and the other 114 contacts made that should have been reported but the trumpies just forged ahead....Those are facts unlike your stupid fucking opinion.....idiot...
The idea that an Attorney General of the United States is NOT going to go back to the law enforcement, dig up all of the evidence, during the two weeks before he issued his summary on an investigation into the President of the United States is absurd.
Hey Denny...
Last time I checked, Jared Kushner and Ivanka Trump are Jewish, Trump moved the US embassy to Jerusalem, has come out in protection of Israel and the Jewish community.
While the Democrats keep electing Muslim congress people with histories of anti-Semitic behavior.. you know, people like Omar who have tweeted out celebratory messages after attacks from Palestinians against Jews.
So you want to find fault in politicians supporting anti-semetic behavior and believing violence against Jews is a good thing. Look no further than the 2019 Democratic Party.
Of Course Roger...
Who knows more about being an Attorney General than a retired construction worker from California such as yourself.
Why the fuck would a guy who has done the job twice now know as much as you?
I guess he should have reopened the investigation and spend another 22 months before making a decision.
Idiot.
Lots of opinion here, just like Lil Scotty. However, it is based on facts rather than others saying it was a witch hunt that yield lots of disturbing behavior that Scott thinks is fine as long as it is trump....!!!!! BWAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!
Like the claim that Obama wiretapped the Golden Tower??,
Obama has been out of office for over 2 years.
You are a brick wall.
rd May 1 at 2:44 PM
ATTORNEY GENERAL William P. Barr entered office with more credibility than many Trump appointees. A veteran of the George H.W. Bush administration, Mr. Barr avowed loyalty to the Justice Department’s mission and, nearing the end of his career, seemed to have little incentive to serve as another Trump sycophant. Yet Mr. Barr has lit his reputation on fire, and he just added more fuel during his Wednesday testimony before a Senate panel.
Much of the hearing centered on the attorney general’s decision to release a highly misleading representation of the findings of special counsel Robert S. Mueller III’s Russia investigation. In particular, Mr. Barr failed to acknowledge the alarming nature of Mr. Mueller’s analysis on whether President Trump obstructed justice, and he did not explain why the special counsel declined to say whether Mr. Trump was guilty of the charge. This really matters: Given the damning account in Mr. Mueller’s report, what appeared to be keeping the special counsel from accusing the president of criminal acts was not the lack of evidence but the fact that the president cannot be charged under Justice Department rules.
Mr. Barr defended himself Wednesday by insisting that his memo, publicized weeks before he released any additional material, was technically accurate, despite the fact that his spin deeply affected the reception of Mr. Mueller’s full report when the public finally got it. It was not supposed to be a full summary of the special counsel’s report, he insisted — just a brief explanation of the top-line conclusions. Mr. Barr’s long history in Washington belies his argument: He should have known how his pre-spinning of the Mueller report would distort the truth of the special counsel’s damning findings to the president’s benefit. He did it anyway.
When you are defeated in a debate you resort to this.
You are a sick old man in denial.
Brick wall syndrome.
Of Course Roger...
Who knows more about being an Attorney General than a retired construction worker from California such as yourself.
Rich coming from the asshole who bragged what a genius he was the other day about law you are constantly wrong about....Barr sold his soul to the devil....why is beyond me unless trump blew him in the oval office....so sad and so predictable.....LOLOLOLOL
Lots of opinion here
The one that counts is the Attorney Generals.
The IG report out maybe as soon as next week should be interesting.
Who knows more about being an Attorney General than a paper pusher from Minneapolis?
This was an investigation into the Russian intervention and possible "collision" .
Yes, the Attorney General of the United States, not the lawyer for the President, should have looked into the details before issuing a highly partisan summary.
Who knows more about being an Attorney General than a paper pusher from Minneapolis?
You are not arguing with me, Roger.
You are arguing that you know better than Barr.
It's one thing if people (like yourself) want to pretend that your vast knowledge of the constitution, criminal law, charging decisions, and the details of the Mueller investigation
Makes your "opinions" about something like whether or not to Charge someone better than the "opinions" of the Attorney General.
But it's quite another when you make out as if you understand better than Barr does what is and is not normal procedures for carrying out the duty of the office.
The reality is that as you sit here right now, you probably know deep down that Barr did exactly what Barr and every other A.G. has done when they had to make charging decisions... and that would be to accept the summary and arguments being made by those investigators who work for them are factually accurate.
Otherwise there wouldn't be a point to having investigators who investigate and write summaries. You would just have the same people who investigate make the final decisions.
But somethings the information gatherers and number crunchers are not the final decision makers, precisely because the decision makers do not have the time to be the information gatherers, number crunchers and be the one who makes all the calls.
The one that counts is the Attorney General's.
Unfortunately, he is not fulfilling his oath to protect the defend the Constitution.
It is very obvious that Trump got what he wanted. Nixon did the same thing.
Lots of fake facts our little scotty choose to ignore....Maybe you should take a quick perusal as to why trump was investigated...no such thing as a coincidence....but his lying was continuous!!!
https://www.factcheck.org/2019/04/what-the-mueller-report-says-about-russian-contacts/
"former vice president Joe Biden declaring that the figures running the Chinese government are “not bad folks” and that “they’re not competition to us”
Yes, the Attorney General of the United States, not the lawyer for the President, should have looked into the details before issuing a highly partisan summary
Herein lies two problems.
First, you are basically saying that the 440 page Mueller report was either inaccurate or incomplete and that ultimately it could not be trusted at face value to be correct in the summaries made.
Second, you are wanting to forget that this is a black or white "LEGAL" decision to be made entirely based on the Constitution, the Law, and Precedent. Politics should play exactly ZERO role in these decisions.
You are just made because the entire thing has blown up and now you look like an idiot for running around the past two years like a chicken with your head cut off screaming Conspiracy Conspiracy Conspiracy!
Obstruction was always a "booby prize" if collusion fell through. As many legal experts who have read this report have concluded, the "obstruction" portion of this investigation started the moment Mueller took the job. The idea was as much about entrapping people into process crimes as it was investigating the dead end of collusion.
You are arguing that you know better than Barr.
BWAAAAAAAAAA!!!! About as humorous as your fake law expertise, Lil Scotty....Barr is a liar, just like trump....he didn't read the evidence because he had all ready made up his mind.....Yeah, his hemming and BS stuttering when asked simple yes or no questions was evidence of him hiding something, just like trump....who got his Roy Cohn into the AG to protect him and fuck the county which you accept with a BIG GULP !!!
President Trump's hiring of Rudy Giuliani was the Perfect Lawyer for the job.
he didn't read the evidence because he had all ready made up his mind
Well on certain issues he had already made up his mind, as would most Attorney Generals would on certain issues of the law. There is nothing wrong with having constitutional beliefs. In fact, I suspect that most people in the Justice department have lots of predefined ideas about what is and what isn't a crime.
But at the the end of the day, his opinion is the one that counts. He is by nature the most qualified person to make the call.
He was Mueller's boss during the Investigation.
Just as he was Mueller's boss when Mueller worked for the DOJ.
He has always been a superior officer to Mueller. His entire career. Always one step ahead of Mueller. There is a reason for that.
So now the line by Socialist Democrats is AG Barr is a liar.
Wow. Ok.
Let's also be clear.
The DOJ or any local DA office has to determine if they can prove a case unanimously to 12 jurors beyond a reasonable doubt.
When you cannot get 12 law experts to even agree if something is or isn't a crime... how can you possibly claim that you can make those charges stick?
The reality is that there is absolutely no way on god's green earth that you can convince 12 random people that the President is guilty of a crime for actions that the A.G. the D.A.G. and multiple other people within the Department of Justice say isn't even a crime to begin with? Not to mention, people like Alan Dershowitz, Andrew McCarthy, etc, etc...
You need EVERYONE TO BE CONVINCED - not just some really passionate people.
There is literally no chance to secure a conviction... even (as Barr points out) you concede that it is a crime, because there is no way to prove the three things necessary. Barr repeated pointed out the flaws in the argument. Repeated stated that the President had many many arguments on his behalf that a defense attorney would use to get a simple acquittal on the facts.
I am arguing with you Scott.
You are defending Barr.
He had enough time to get into the details of the investigation, because they were investigating the President!
I may be a retired construction worker,who also moved up into a very complicated position.
We had to understand highly complex engineering and construction work, in operating hospitals. I trained two people who both had college degrees in construction management how to do their job.
Both are very successful. One works for USC. He's the director of the building management and construction of new campus buildings.
I'm capable of discussing politics and the Constitution, and I try to think outside of partisan politics and see the bigger picture.
I don't like to give the executive branch unlimited authority, above the law.
You don't care because there is an (R) beside his name.
Projecting is the hallmark of a loser
Roger, a question.
What is in the supporting Evidence that Mueller missed and Mueller Failed to state in his report?
Ty.
I disagree with Pres.Trump on any involvement in Venezuela .
And we should not spend $2 Trillion on infrastructure projects .
Roger
I am not the one who stated that it is not normal procedure for an Attorney General and Deputy Attorney General to go back through all of the underlying documents before making a judgement.
That was the Attorney General who stated that.
So you are arguing that the Attorney General cannot draw a conclusion unless he spends the time to go through every document gathered over 22 months by over two dozen different people. By some accounts, they gathered hundreds of thousands of documents that not even Mueller has reviewed in its entirety.
Are you seriously making that argument?
or more to the point... did you seriously fall for what Kamala Harris tossed out there as political "trick"?
I didn't fall for a trick but you sure did.
You fell in love with Trump.
He's above the law and you don't care.
He has done nothing In regards to figure out how to protect ourselves from future attacks on our elections.
His staff has told people to never talk about how to protect ourselves from future attacks on our elections.
Your not worried about him being above the law.
Brick wall syndrome.
AG Barr took the Socialist Democrats to the woodshed.
Obama in 2016 failed to protect the National Election.
Nellie Ohr's 'Hi Honey' emails to DOJ about Russia collusion should alarm us all
The entire democrat charade of "there's nothing to see here" will collapse once indictments start arriving. Nellie won't be sleeping well as well as a bunch of her bosses.
That's what's scaring the shit out of them and it shows. Just look here.
Barr was cool as a cucumber playing poker with pocket aces against amateurs holding a deuce of spades and a seven of diamonds in Texas hold'em. And Obama in the background repeating his idiotic "don't call my bluff".
SWEET !!!
Hillary Clinton said votes were changed in 2016.
I want her to keep talking
Hillary asks China to back Democrats and hack the IRS for President Trump Tax returns.
You know, the only other adversary of ours who's anywhere near as good as the Russians is China. So why should Russia have all the fun? And since Russia is clearly backing Republicans, why don't we ask China to back us,'" Clinton said during an interview with MSNBC's Rachel Maddow, before invoking comments Trump made in 2016.
"And not only that, 'China, if you're listening, why don't you get Trump's tax returns. I'm sure our media would richly reward you,'" Clinton said. "Now, according to the Mueller report, that is not conspiracy because it's done right out in the open. So if after this hypothetical Democratic candidate says this on your show, within hours, all of a sudden, the IRS offices are bombarded with incredibly sophisticated cybertools looking for Trump's tax returns, and then extracts and them and then passes them to whatever the new WikiLeaks happens to be and they start being unraveled and disclosed, nothing wrong with that."
Who said the following about Old Tired Botox Biden.
"It’s wrong to pretend that China isn’t one of our major economic competitors,” “When we are in the White House we will win that competition by fixing our trade policies.”
1, Pres. TRUMP
2, Senator Bernie Sanders
Dirty Cops and Obama/Biden knew.
"George Papadopoulos, a former Trump campaign aide, was the target of an F.B.I. investigation into connections between the campaign and Russia.CreditTom Brenner for The New York Times
By Adam Goldman, Michael S. Schmidt and Mark Mazzetti
May 2, 2019
WASHINGTON — The conversation at a London bar in September 2016 took a strange turn when the woman sitting across from George Papadopoulos, a Trump campaign adviser, asked a direct question: Was the Trump campaign working with Russia?"
Roger's new hit song!
Above the law!
He's above the law and you don't care.
I lose sleep at night, cause he's such a scare.
If this keeps up, I'll lose my hair
He's above the law and you don't care!
Roger...
Yes or No...
You feel the Attorney General's job is to go through 22 months worth of information gathered by over two dozen people...
before bothering to reach any conclusions about anything?
Silence from the sage of mahogany ridge. When you corner him he just slips away with his tail between his legs.
You feel the Attorney General's job is to go through 22 months worth of information gathered by over two dozen people...
Did not Barr say that he went through the evidence and concluded it did not come up to obstruction???
Did he also say he did not review the evidence from the report which includes all the background information...
Funny how both those quotes are conflicted and you and cramps do not see it....
Dirty Cops and Obama/Biden knew.
What exactly did they know goat fucking idiot.....And please be specific for the first time in your worthless life....
Blogger KD said...
Hillary asks China to back Democrats and hack the IRS for President Trump Tax returns.
Which she said with tongue firmly implanted in cheek.....asshole goat fucking idiot...
Hillary asks China to back Democrats and hack the IRS for President Trump Tax returns.
LOCK HER UP!!!!!!
Did not Barr say that he went through the evidence and concluded it did not come up to obstruction???
No, he went through the arguments and facts Mueller wrote in the report.
Try to keep up.
KD said...
AG Barr took the Socialist Democrats and WHAT WAS LEFT OF HIS REPUTATION to the woodshed.
Fixed it for you again goat fucking loser......LOLOLOLO
Dennis is having a terrible day today. His collusion delusion is collapsing all around him and his local Golden Corral is close for remodeling.
Dennis is having a terrible day today
BWAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!! I'm at my mountain cabin enjoying you and the assholes twist and squirm as you try to rationalize you love for a nazi kkk loving POTUS whose idea of truth is lying....Yeah....Im having a great day.....BTW....collusion is not a legal term, but since trump used it for his faux exoneration.....go for it jag off!!!
I'm at my mountain cabin
Translation: He's in a double-wide on a dung hill.
Dense Denise
When Trump said Russia find the Hillary emails - launch a 2 year investigation
When Hillary ask for China's help so Socialist Democrats can win the Presidency, well, you know, it is just a joke.
CS , Denise is all BS and no cattle.
IF he ownes two home then his so called environmentalism is negated.
Post a Comment