A man was telling his buddy : "You won't believe what happened last night."
My daughter walked into the living room and said : Dad, cancel my allowance immediately, forget my college tuition loan, rent my room out, throw all my clothes out the window, take my TV and my laptop.
Please take any of my jewelry to the Salvation Army or Cash Converters. Then sell my car, take my house key away, and throw me out.
Then disown me and never talk to me again. And don't forget to write me out of your will and leave my share to any charity you choose."
"Holy Smokes," replied the friend, " - she actually said that?"
"Well, she didn't put it quite like that. She actually said :
"Dad, meet my new boyfriend, Mohammed. We're going to work together on Elizabeth Warren’s Presidential Campaign."
"Dad, meet my new boyfriend, Mohammed. We're going to work together on Elizabeth Warren’s Presidential Campaign."
About as funny as your hanging hemorrhoid !!!!! Only funny when you sit down!!!! BWAAAAAAAAAA!!!! As your bigotry once again shines brightly......sure feel sorry for your spawn having an old man as negative as you!!!!!!
Rep. Justin Amash (R-MI) slammed President Trump and Attorney General William Barr is a series of tweets, while saying he offers his conclusions “only after having read Mueller’s redacted report carefully and completely.”
Amash states his “principal conclusions” as follows:
Attorney General Barr has deliberately misrepresented Mueller’s report. President Trump has engaged in impeachable conduct. Partisanship has eroded our system of checks and balances. Few members of Congress have read the report. He concludes: “America’s institutions depend on officials to uphold both the rules and spirit of our constitutional system even when to do so is personally inconvenient or yields a politically unfavorable outcome. Our Constitution is brilliant and awesome; it deserves a government to match it.”
Two people who were fired because they were having sex, and texting each other, were the only reason to initiate the investigation into the Russian intervention into the election.
Amash -- a libertarian conservative elected during the Tea Party wave of 2010 -- was a founding member of the House Freedom Caucus, a key bloc of Republicans who worked to shift the GOP caucus to the right on many issues, but in the Trump era, he has found himself breaking with his conservative allies who have embraced the President.
They say Democrats are so angry, the angrier a candidate can be, the better chance he or she has to win the Democratic nomination. Well I don’t believe it, I really don’t.
If the American people want a president to add to our division, lead with a clenched fist, closed hand, a hard heart, to demonize the opponents and spew hatred — they don’t need me. They’ve got President Donald Trump. Folks, I am running to offer our country — Democrats, Republicans and independents — a different path. Not back to a path that never was, but to a future that fulfills our true potential as a country.
Former FBI general counsel James Baker said Friday he viewed the Steele dossier “skeptically” and was “concerned” about the veracity of the document when the bureau received it before the 2016 election.
But despite those concerns, Baker was one of the FBI officials who reviewed the Carter Page surveillance warrant application, which relied heavily on information from the dossier.
[...]
Steele first provided information from his Trump investigation July 5, 2016, but his reports reportedly did not make their way to the FBI team leading the Trump probe until mid-September 2016. The FBI was aware Steele was working for Democrats, and that he had told a Justice Department official he was “desperate” to see Trump lose the 2016 election.
Here are my principal conclusions: 1. Attorney General Barr has deliberately misrepresented Mueller’s report. 2. President Trump has engaged in impeachable conduct. 3. Partisanship has eroded our system of checks and balances. 4. Few members of Congress have read the report.
I offer these conclusions only after having read Mueller’s redacted report carefully and completely, having read or watched pertinent statements and testimony, and having discussed this matter with my staff, who thoroughly reviewed materials and provided me with further analysis.
In comparing Barr’s principal conclusions, congressional testimony, and other statements to Mueller’s report, it is clear that Barr intended to mislead the public about Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s analysis and findings.
Barr’s misrepresentations are significant but often subtle, frequently taking the form of sleight-of-hand qualifications or logical fallacies, which he hopes people will not notice.
Under our Constitution, the president “shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.” While “high Crimes and Misdemeanors” is not defined, the context implies conduct that violates the public trust.
Contrary to Barr’s portrayal, Mueller’s report reveals that President Trump engaged in specific actions and a pattern of behavior that meet the threshold for impeachment.
In fact, Mueller’s report identifies multiple examples of conduct satisfying all the elements of obstruction of justice, and undoubtedly any person who is not the president of the United States would be indicted based on such evidence.
Impeachment, which is a special form of indictment, does not even require probable cause that a crime (e.g., obstruction of justice) has been committed; it simply requires a finding that an official has engaged in careless, abusive, corrupt, or otherwise dishonorable conduct.
Amash -- a libertarian conservative elected during the Tea Party wave of 2010 -- was a founding member of the House Freedom Caucus
and this proves exactly what, alky?
jeff flake was swept into office on the momentum of the tea party as well.
and look at what a traitorous piece of shit he turned out to be.
the tea party and it's various spin-offs got used by scumbags like amash and flake. and that was pretty much inevitable. cunning, devious shitstains like these two sometimes manage to fool their supporters for political gain and ride them to victory only to stab them in the back after they're safely ensconced in DC..
john "forrestal" mcstain set the gold standard for this type of behavior.
While impeachment should be undertaken only in extraordinary circumstances, the risk we face in an environment of extreme partisanship is not that Congress will employ it as a remedy too often but rather that Congress will employ it so rarely that it cannot deter misconduct.
Our system of checks and balances relies on each branch’s jealously guarding its powers and upholding its duties under our Constitution. When loyalty to a political party or to an individual trumps loyalty to the Constitution, the Rule of Law—the foundation of liberty—crumbles.
We’ve witnessed members of Congress from both parties shift their views 180 degrees—on the importance of character, on the principles of obstruction of justice—depending on whether they’re discussing Bill Clinton or Donald Trump.
Few members of Congress even read Mueller’s report; their minds were made up based on partisan affiliation—and it showed, with representatives and senators from both parties issuing definitive statements on the 448-page report’s conclusions within just hours of its release.
America’s institutions depend on officials to uphold both the rules and spirit of our constitutional system even when to do so is personally inconvenient or yields a politically unfavorable outcome. Our Constitution is brilliant and awesome; it deserves a government to match it.
====== Donald Trump is destroying the government established under the Constitution.
Contrary to Barr’s portrayal, Mueller’s report reveals that President Trump engaged in specific actions and a pattern of behavior that meet the threshold for impeachment.
a claim repeatedly made, yet not one person making it has found the ambition to provide the details of those "specific actions."
serious people would begin this conversation by asking WHY, and exactly what those "specific actions" consisted of.
one can only conclude that amash was seeking a headline, and that he does not really wish to be taken seriously.
for chrissakes, even maggie haberman wouldn't touch this. the times had to get that serial sexual abuser glenn thrush to write the story.
Our system of checks and balances relies on each branch’s jealously guarding its powers and upholding its duties under our Constitution. When loyalty to a political party or to an individual trumps loyalty to the Constitution, the Rule of Law—the foundation of liberty—crumbles.
and i'm old enough to remember when the democrats in congress willfully and gleefully ceded very large swaths of their constitutional authority to "captain pen & phone," with some members of the congressional black caucus even taking to the house floor to offer declarative statements on how they should gift even MORE of their power to ol' skeets.
and you worried not one bit about any of that betrayal of the "foundation of liberty" back then alky.
when the democrats in congress willfully and gleefully ceded very large swaths of their constitutional authority to "captain pen & phone,"
What a crock of bullshit opinion.....the only ones gleefully ceding power are the current crop of R senators who slurp, defend and lie to keep trump happy and maintain their jobs without being primaries....IOW's a group of chickenshti assholes who make party rather than country #1 !!!!!
About as credible as you!!!!!! BWAAAAAAA!!! A tweet opinion is worth NOTHING!!!! Another dumb fucking asshole without enough grey matter to think......!!!!
The big picture: President Trump is acting true to history. Every Republican president since Reagan has left office with a budget deficit higher than the one he inherited. Clinton and Obama, by contrast, left office with smaller deficits.
SWAMP REUNION: Obama’s Three Muses Reappear In Mueller’s Trump Investigation
Four years ago, the Observer published my first article entitled All the President’s Muses. It was triggered by this picture, taken in the White House after the Benghazi murders. My concern was that President Barack Obama surrounded himself with former federal prosecutors who would do anything to win. . . . And, here they are again.
This triumvirate of cover-up experts is central to the Obama White House arm of the conspiracy to surveil the Trump campaign, the phony FISA warrant, “unmaskings” of Americans in the Trump campaign and denials of information to the incoming president of the United States. Who are they? ….. Just ignore the Strzok-Page text message that President Obama wanted “to know everything” back as far as September 2016. Never mind the Steele dossier was bought and paid for by Clinton and the DNC. Forget the fictional dossier was the foundation of a gargantuan effort to prove Trump-Russia “collusion,” withhold information from the incoming administration, conduct illegal surveillance, obstruct justice, lie to courts, and to justify special counsel. Overlook the fact that Comey went to brief Trump on the dossier the next day.
No, President Obama did not discuss any of this on January 5 with the most senior people in the real conspiracy — at least not in THAT conversation. He just said handle it “by the book.” Kathryn Ruemmler and Susan Rice have said so. No doubt Ms. Monaco will agree.
0linsky DOUBLED our national debt, accumulating more debt than all of his predecessors combined.
trying to obfuscate the issue by referring to the deficit, which is minor as opposed to the debt which is crushing is a not so clever bit of sleight of hand that defenders of 0linsky must rely upon to fool the uninformed.
The big picture: President Trump is acting true to history. Every Republican president since Reagan has left office with a budget deficit higher than the one he inherited. Clinton and Obama, by contrast, left office with smaller deficits.
The deficit spending was lower than the day he left office.
You don't know how to read graphs based upon the facts.
and the deficit is the amount of money you are spending.
When Bill Clinton left office the national deficit spending was almost zero. If the President Bush tax cuts had not passed, we would have paying off the national debt!
rrb said... 0linsky DOUBLED our national debt, accumulating more debt than all of his predecessors combined.
trying to obfuscate the issue by referring to the deficit, which is minor as opposed to the debt which is crushing is a not so clever bit of sleight of hand that defenders of 0linsky must rely upon to fool the uninformed.
And debt service, entitlements and other skyrocketing spending need bold actions. Only bold president we've had in forever is Reagan and now Trump.
and almost 70% of it is driven by your beloved entitlements, alky.
socialist security, medicare, medicaid, EBT, section 8, food stamps, welfare, WIC, and every other stupid fucking program imaginable contrived from fascist delano roosevelt's new deal and LBJ's great society. all so those ni@@ers would keep voting democrat for the next 200 years.
erskine bowles and alan simpson came up with a plan to deal with all of it. and 0linsky said nah brah.
democrats respond to our "drowning in debt" by proposing ONE HUNDRED TRILLION DOLLAR$ worth of new spending, lavishing even more free shit on the freeloaders AND...
...openly expressing a desire to import several million more freeloaders from south of the border, with the promise of giving them free fucking EVERYTHING from college to free healthcare to a universal basic income. all in exchange for a democrat vote.
Never a fan of @justinamash, a total lightweight who opposes me and some of our great Republican ideas and policies just for the sake of getting his name out there through controversy. If he actually read the biased Mueller Report, “composed” by 18 Angry Dems who hated Trump,....
....he would see that it was nevertheless strong on NO COLLUSION and, ultimately, NO OBSTRUCTION...Anyway, how do you Obstruct when there is no crime and, in fact, the crimes were committed by the other side? Justin is a loser who sadly plays right into our opponents hands!
That’s not what Mueller said. As over 900 federal prosecutors concluded, Mueller established that he obstructed justice. If he were not president, you would have been indicted.
Bush's second term we averaged $478 Billion in deficits (over his eight years we added approx $2.4 trillion in debt)
Obama's first term we averaged $1.359 Trillion in deficits Obama's second term we averaged $580 Billion in deficits (over his eight years we added approx $8.4 trillion in debt)
Depending on how you view it, the claim might be true as a statistical anomaly, but there is no way that Obama was fiscally sound.
The professionals whose job it is to decide these things, all decided that the issues raised by Mueller for the most part were not even obstruction as a matter of law, and where there may have been relevant law involved that he didn't come close to showing he had a case that could be brought before a jury.
You have to get two things through your thick skull.
There was no conspiracy, coordination or collusion between the Trump campaign and the people responsible for the election meddling.
A criminal case where legal experts are in open disagreement about whether or not the actions raised could even "be" criminal can never be (in good conscious) brought before a jury when you need a strong personal belief that you can prove the case to 12 jurors (at least half of which believe no crime has been committed) unanimously beyond a reasonable doubt.
The very concept that there is so much disagreement is 100% proof that the case cannot be proven unanimously.
As over 900 federal prosecutors concluded, Mueller established that he obstructed justice.
yet mueller himself could not bring himself to recommend indictment of trump, nor any other american for obstruction, collusion, or whatever the fuck else you guys wish to call it.
not a single american was brought up on ANY charges related to russia.
not one.
so i guess that leaves me to conclude that those 900 prosecutors are simply never trump hacks soaking in a huge vat of 'orange man bad' TDS.
furthermore, if mueller was actually serious about bringing some russians to justice, the 13 indictments he DID issue against those russian meddlers could have remained sealed and secret, which would have then afforded him the luxury of possibly arresting them here before they fled back to moscow, never to see the inside of an american courtroom or prison cell. issuance of those indictments was all for show, to give clowns like you a fresh reason to masturbate to your mueller portraits.
the whole thing was bullshit from day one, alky.
a fable concocted by the staffers of a feckless cunt to explain away the most epic and stunning political defeat in american history.
Obama's first term we averaged $1.359 Trillion in deficits
And how much of that first term is directly attributable to the busch recession.....Lil Scotty.....a percentage calculation would be sufficient.......since tax collections did not recover to busch levels until well into l his second year!!!!!
Fiscal 2007: $161 billion (next to last year of Bush’s second term) Fiscal 2008: $459 billion (beginning impact from the Great Recession) Fiscal 2009: $1.4 trillion (Obama’s first year and in the teeth of the Recession) Fiscal 2010: $1.3 trillion Fiscal 2011: $1.3 trillion Fiscal 2012: $1.1 trillion Fiscal 2013: $680 billion Fiscal 2014: $485 billion Fiscal 2015: $438 billion Fiscal 2016: $587 billion
Another memory job for the weak minded lil Scotty....thanx to trump and his tax cuts.....deficits are heading back to busch recession numbers in a booming economy!!!!!
nnual budget deficits, which represent the federal government’s spending in excess of revenue, have begun to rise for the first time in seven years, dating back to 2009. President Obama inherited a deficit of $1.4 trillion when he took office at the end of the Great Recession. The first chart shows that deficits began to shrink as the economy slowly recovered. As of 2016 the shortfall has started growing again. The red ink increased $152 billion from last year, for a total projected deficit of $590 billion. This increase is also reflected in the fact that the deficit has resumed growing as a share of GDP for the first time since 2009.
Other than not using the "on-budget" numbers you basically repeated what I stated, with excuses as to why Roger was wrong to suggest that Obama lowered the deficit.
Secondly, Obama didn't inherit that first budget. Congress specifically didn't pass a budget till Obama was in office. In fact, the original stimulus plan passed by congress and signed into law by Obama was a significant part of that 2009 budget.
So to suggest that somehow Bush was responsible for a budget he didn't write, that included spending that he didn't sign into law is simple case of revisionist history.
A bill that would see Texas men fined $100 (£82) for masturbating has taken a step closer to becoming law after it received its first reading in the state’s House of Representatives.
Under section 173.010 of House Bill 4260, the Man’s Right to Know Act, Texas men would only be allowed to masturbate under supervision, inside approved health care and medical facilities.
Any “unregulated masturbatory emissions outside of a woman’s vagina, or created outside of a health or medical facility, will be charged a $100 civil penalty for each emission, and will be considered an act against an unborn child, and failing to preserve the sanctity of life.”
I hope you realize that the Texas bill is considered satire and was proposed by a Democratic women who is attempting to turn the tables on what she feels is a government intrusion into women's sexuality.
I liked the way Kevin McCarthy threw Amish under the bus by claiming he voted with Pelosi most of the time and therefore was a POS....Funny thing , McCarhty LIED!!!! His record for the 116th congress he voted with trump over 90% of the time!!!!! Shocking how they all got on the same page to disparage a fellow congressman with nothing but LIES.....something Lil Scotty endorses and practices.....LOLOLOLOLOL
And the lying of trump continues unabated.....and you slurpers will continue to swallow without missing a drop of his manhood.... Wonder when the rest of the right will grow a set like Amash and come out of your coma's.....but I don't hold out any hope.....BWAAAAAAAA!!!!
By Glenn Kessler May 20 at 3:00 AM “It now seems the General Flynn was under investigation long before was common knowledge. It would have been impossible for me to know this but, if that was the case, and with me being one of two people who would become president, why was I not told so that I could make a change?”
— President Trump, in a tweet, May 17, 2019
The president tweeted that he did not realize Michael Flynn, his first national security adviser, had been under investigation on suspicion of being a Russian agent and that he should have been warned.
This is a puzzling complaint. First, a report issued by a Republican-led House committee — often touted by Trump — disclosed in 2018 that there had been an ongoing counterintelligence investigation of Flynn. So that’s not new information. Second, Trump was warned by President Barack Obama not to hire Flynn — and the report by special counsel Robert S. Mueller III says that warning actually soured Trump on Flynn.
Here’s what we know about the warnings Trump received about Flynn. In a narrow, technical sense, Trump was not warned that Flynn was being investigated as a possible Russian agent. But there were plenty of other flashing lights that Flynn was trouble — warnings that Trump chose to ignore.
The Facts
Flynn was fired on Feb. 13, 2017, in the opening weeks of the Trump administration, after he supposedly misled Vice President Pence about a conversation with then-Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak. Flynn had claimed he had not requested the Russian government decline to respond to sanctions imposed by Obama, when, in fact, he had delivered that message and Russia had agreed. (The whole story can be seen in our compelling video above.)
Mueller secured Flynn’s guilty plea to lying to FBI agents, who, on Jan. 24, had interviewed him about his conversations with Kislyak. U.S. officials had become aware of the Flynn-Kislyak conversations because of intelligence monitoring of Kislyak, as they tried to determine why Russia had decided not to retaliate in response to the sanctions.
The House Intelligence Committee report detailed that Flynn had already been the subject of a counterintelligence investigation. It was possibly sparked by his 2015 attendance at the 10th anniversary gala in Moscow for the state-sponsored Russian television network RT, for which he earned $45,000 and was seated next to President Vladimir Putin. The Mueller report indicates a key focus was Flynn’s relationship with Kislyak: “Previously, the FBI had opened an investigation of Flynn based on his relationship with the Russian government. Flynn’s contacts with Kislyak became a key component of that investigation.”
The House committee report says the FBI had been prepared to end the counterintelligence investigation against Flynn, but then the conversation with Kislyak was discovered.
76 comments:
Factose Intolerant could have had a picture of Roger.
A man was telling his buddy : "You won't believe what happened last night."
My daughter walked into the living room and said : Dad, cancel my allowance immediately, forget my college tuition loan, rent my room out, throw all my clothes out the window, take my TV and my laptop.
Please take any of my jewelry to the Salvation Army or Cash Converters. Then sell my car, take my house key away, and throw me out.
Then disown me and never talk to me again. And don't forget to write me out of your will and leave my share to any charity you choose."
"Holy Smokes," replied the friend, " - she actually said that?"
"Well, she didn't put it quite like that. She actually said :
"Dad, meet my new boyfriend, Mohammed. We're going to work together on Elizabeth Warren’s Presidential Campaign."
"Dad, meet my new boyfriend, Mohammed. We're going to work together on Elizabeth Warren’s Presidential Campaign."
About as funny as your hanging hemorrhoid !!!!! Only funny when you sit down!!!! BWAAAAAAAAAA!!!! As your bigotry once again shines brightly......sure feel sorry for your spawn having an old man as negative as you!!!!!!
GOP Lawmaker Unloads on Trump and Barr
Rep. Justin Amash (R-MI) slammed President Trump and Attorney General William Barr is a series of tweets, while saying he offers his conclusions “only after having read Mueller’s redacted report carefully and completely.”
Amash states his “principal conclusions” as follows:
Attorney General Barr has deliberately misrepresented Mueller’s report.
President Trump has engaged in impeachable conduct.
Partisanship has eroded our system of checks and balances.
Few members of Congress have read the report.
He concludes: “America’s institutions depend on officials to uphold both the rules and spirit of our constitutional system even when to do so is personally inconvenient or yields a politically unfavorable outcome. Our Constitution is brilliant and awesome; it deserves a government to match it.”
The source rat the fuck forgot to mention....LOLOLOLOLOL
http://forum.johndee.com/vbulletin/showthread.php?57056-The-daughter
wrong again, denny.
it come from AoS.
moron.
Worthy of a repost:
"cowardly king obamaMay 18, 2019 at 11:52 AM
I see lo iq "unknown" had posted this:
"Climate change takes centre stage in Australia's election" along with the Lowy poll which had showed the left winning
They lost
Great poll
ROFLMFAO !!"
President Trump has engaged in impeachable conduct.
amash makes the claim without offering a single specific.
just like lil schitt telling us that evidence of collusion was "in plain sight."
heh.
what a tool.
Two people who were fired because they were having sex, and texting each other, were the only reason to initiate the investigation into the Russian intervention into the election.
That's the real Sunday Funny.
UK elections look interesting.
Amash -- a libertarian conservative elected during the Tea Party wave of 2010 -- was a founding member of the House Freedom Caucus, a key bloc of Republicans who worked to shift the GOP caucus to the right on many issues, but in the Trump era, he has found himself breaking with his conservative allies who have embraced the President.
CNN
They say Democrats are so angry, the angrier a candidate can be, the better chance he or she has to win the Democratic nomination. Well I don’t believe it, I really don’t.
If the American people want a president to add to our division, lead with a clenched fist, closed hand, a hard heart, to demonize the opponents and spew hatred — they don’t need me. They’ve got President Donald Trump. Folks, I am running to offer our country — Democrats, Republicans and independents — a different path. Not back to a path that never was, but to a future that fulfills our true potential as a country.
Blogger KD said...
Worthy of a repost:
The goat fucking idiot once again proves why he is a goat fucking idiot!!!!!
BWAAAAAAAAAAA!!! Still has no visible means of support or a job.....Too pathetic that you still have the right to vote!!!!!
Former FBI general counsel James Baker said Friday he viewed the Steele dossier “skeptically” and was “concerned” about the veracity of the document when the bureau received it before the 2016 election.
But despite those concerns, Baker was one of the FBI officials who reviewed the Carter Page surveillance warrant application, which relied heavily on information from the dossier.
[...]
Steele first provided information from his Trump investigation July 5, 2016, but his reports reportedly did not make their way to the FBI team leading the Trump probe until mid-September 2016. The FBI was aware Steele was working for Democrats, and that he had told a Justice Department official he was “desperate” to see Trump lose the 2016 election.
https://dailycaller.com/2019/05/18/james-baker-steele-dossier-fbi/
Here are my principal conclusions:
1. Attorney General Barr has deliberately misrepresented Mueller’s report.
2. President Trump has engaged in impeachable conduct.
3. Partisanship has eroded our system of checks and balances.
4. Few members of Congress have read the report.
I offer these conclusions only after having read Mueller’s redacted report carefully and completely, having read or watched pertinent statements and testimony, and having discussed this matter with my staff, who thoroughly reviewed materials and provided me with further analysis.
In comparing Barr’s principal conclusions, congressional testimony, and other statements to Mueller’s report, it is clear that Barr intended to mislead the public about Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s analysis and findings.
Barr’s misrepresentations are significant but often subtle, frequently taking the form of sleight-of-hand qualifications or logical fallacies, which he hopes people will not notice.
Obama/Biden knew.
The leadership of the CIA/FBI and others under the command and control of Obama/Biden have formed a circular firing squad.
Under our Constitution, the president “shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.” While “high Crimes and Misdemeanors” is not defined, the context implies conduct that violates the public trust.
Contrary to Barr’s portrayal, Mueller’s report reveals that President Trump engaged in specific actions and a pattern of behavior that meet the threshold for impeachment.
Roger was once against attacking the AG.
In fact, Mueller’s report identifies multiple examples of conduct satisfying all the elements of obstruction of justice, and undoubtedly any person who is not the president of the United States would be indicted based on such evidence.
Impeachment, which is a special form of indictment, does not even require probable cause that a crime (e.g., obstruction of justice) has been committed; it simply requires a finding that an official has engaged in careless, abusive, corrupt, or otherwise dishonorable conduct.
Amash -- a libertarian conservative elected during the Tea Party wave of 2010 -- was a founding member of the House Freedom Caucus
and this proves exactly what, alky?
jeff flake was swept into office on the momentum of the tea party as well.
and look at what a traitorous piece of shit he turned out to be.
the tea party and it's various spin-offs got used by scumbags like amash and flake. and that was pretty much inevitable. cunning, devious shitstains like these two sometimes manage to fool their supporters for political gain and ride them to victory only to stab them in the back after they're safely ensconced in DC..
john "forrestal" mcstain set the gold standard for this type of behavior.
Inflation is well below the Federal Reserve Target Rate.
Roger had predicted Carter like inflation.
While impeachment should be undertaken only in extraordinary circumstances, the risk we face in an environment of extreme partisanship is not that Congress will employ it as a remedy too often but rather that Congress will employ it so rarely that it cannot deter misconduct.
Our system of checks and balances relies on each branch’s jealously guarding its powers and upholding its duties under our Constitution. When loyalty to a political party or to an individual trumps loyalty to the Constitution, the Rule of Law—the foundation of liberty—crumbles.
give thrush his credit alky...
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/18/us/politics/trump-justin-amash-impeachment.html
it come from AoS.
What ever that is....still stolen asshole!!!!! rat the dumb fuck gets caught again!!!!!
We’ve witnessed members of Congress from both parties shift their views 180 degrees—on the importance of character, on the principles of obstruction of justice—depending on whether they’re discussing Bill Clinton or Donald Trump.
Few members of Congress even read Mueller’s report; their minds were made up based on partisan affiliation—and it showed, with representatives and senators from both parties issuing definitive statements on the 448-page report’s conclusions within just hours of its release.
America’s institutions depend on officials to uphold both the rules and spirit of our constitutional system even when to do so is personally inconvenient or yields a politically unfavorable outcome. Our Constitution is brilliant and awesome; it deserves a government to match it.
======
Donald Trump is destroying the government established under the Constitution.
Roger had predicted Carter like inflation.
And you call GW a hoax......BWAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!
https://twitter.com/justinamash/status/1129831629910872064?s=19
Contrary to Barr’s portrayal, Mueller’s report reveals that President Trump engaged in specific actions and a pattern of behavior that meet the threshold for impeachment.
a claim repeatedly made, yet not one person making it has found the ambition to provide the details of those "specific actions."
serious people would begin this conversation by asking WHY, and exactly what those "specific actions" consisted of.
one can only conclude that amash was seeking a headline, and that he does not really wish to be taken seriously.
for chrissakes, even maggie haberman wouldn't touch this. the times had to get that serial sexual abuser glenn thrush to write the story.
heh.
Directly from Twitter dumbshit
Donald Trump is destroying the government established under the Constitution.
and you parrot this claim without ever offering a single example.
mail order bailed for a reason, alky.
FBI officials who reviewed the Carter Page surveillance warrant application, which relied heavily on information from the dossier.
Another lie perpetrated by the right for weak minded dumb fucks like rat hole to latch onto as fact!!! BWAAAAAAAA!!!!
Our system of checks and balances relies on each branch’s jealously guarding its powers and upholding its duties under our Constitution. When loyalty to a political party or to an individual trumps loyalty to the Constitution, the Rule of Law—the foundation of liberty—crumbles.
and i'm old enough to remember when the democrats in congress willfully and gleefully ceded very large swaths of their constitutional authority to "captain pen & phone," with some members of the congressional black caucus even taking to the house floor to offer declarative statements on how they should gift even MORE of their power to ol' skeets.
and you worried not one bit about any of that betrayal of the "foundation of liberty" back then alky.
@JohnWHuber
The FBI/DOJ didn't rely on the "Steele" dossier to get the @carterwpage FISA warrant. Apart from cut and pasting the exact wording from it
https://twitter.com/JohnWHuber/status/1129868211346919425
guess lo iq "anonymous" is unaware this counts as relying on.
ROFLMFAO !!!
when the democrats in congress willfully and gleefully ceded very large swaths of their constitutional authority to "captain pen & phone,"
What a crock of bullshit opinion.....the only ones gleefully ceding power are the current crop of R senators who slurp, defend and lie to keep trump happy and maintain their jobs without being primaries....IOW's a group of chickenshti assholes who make party rather than country #1 !!!!!
Anonymous Undercover Huber said...
@JohnWHuber
About as credible as you!!!!!! BWAAAAAAA!!! A tweet opinion is worth NOTHING!!!! Another dumb fucking asshole without enough grey matter to think......!!!!
The big picture: President Trump is acting true to history. Every Republican president since Reagan has left office with a budget deficit higher than the one he inherited. Clinton and Obama, by contrast, left office with smaller deficits.
SWAMP REUNION: Obama’s Three Muses Reappear In Mueller’s Trump Investigation
Four years ago, the Observer published my first article entitled All the President’s Muses. It was triggered by this picture, taken in the White House after the Benghazi murders. My concern was that President Barack Obama surrounded himself with former federal prosecutors who would do anything to win. . . . And, here they are again.
This triumvirate of cover-up experts is central to the Obama White House arm of the conspiracy to surveil the Trump campaign, the phony FISA warrant, “unmaskings” of Americans in the Trump campaign and denials of information to the incoming president of the United States. Who are they?
…..
Just ignore the Strzok-Page text message that President Obama wanted “to know everything” back as far as September 2016. Never mind the Steele dossier was bought and paid for by Clinton and the DNC. Forget the fictional dossier was the foundation of a gargantuan effort to prove Trump-Russia “collusion,” withhold information from the incoming administration, conduct illegal surveillance, obstruct justice, lie to courts, and to justify special counsel. Overlook the fact that Comey went to brief Trump on the dossier the next day.
No, President Obama did not discuss any of this on January 5 with the most senior people in the real conspiracy — at least not in THAT conversation. He just said handle it “by the book.” Kathryn Ruemmler and Susan Rice have said so. No doubt Ms. Monaco will agree.
Muse on this for a while.
https://dailycaller.com/2018/03/01/reunited-and-it-feels-so-swampy-obamas-three-muses-reappear-in-muellers-trump-investigation/
No wonder the democrats are scared shitless about Barr
0linsky DOUBLED our national debt, accumulating more debt than all of his predecessors combined.
trying to obfuscate the issue by referring to the deficit, which is minor as opposed to the debt which is crushing is a not so clever bit of sleight of hand that defenders of 0linsky must rely upon to fool the uninformed.
oh, and here's your stolen link:
https://www.axios.com/federal-budget-deficit-trump-obama-f11a2d59-56cb-4932-a60b-6ed152a670a8.html
asshat.
lo iq "anonymous" a tweet showing actual documents is not an opinion.
Well maybe if you are so lo iq you cannot even grasp that.
check it out:
https://twitter.com/JohnWHuber/status/1129868211346919425
lo iq, dumber than shit and constantly proving it.
ROFLMFAO !!!
https://www.axios.com/federal-deficit-is-growing-64b6cfe2-4477-45b1-b94b-81540c3c1262.html
Read the report and the graph.
The big picture: President Trump is acting true to history. Every Republican president since Reagan has left office with a budget deficit higher than the one he inherited. Clinton and Obama, by contrast, left office with smaller deficits.
The deficit spending was lower than the day he left office.
You don't know how to read graphs based upon the facts.
debt is how much you owe
and the deficit is the amount of money you are spending.
When Bill Clinton left office the national deficit spending was almost zero. If the President Bush tax cuts had not passed, we would have paying off the national debt!
rrb said...
0linsky DOUBLED our national debt, accumulating more debt than all of his predecessors combined.
trying to obfuscate the issue by referring to the deficit, which is minor as opposed to the debt which is crushing is a not so clever bit of sleight of hand that defenders of 0linsky must rely upon to fool the uninformed.
And debt service, entitlements and other skyrocketing spending need bold actions. Only bold president we've had in forever is Reagan and now Trump.
America's hope. or else we drown.
and the deficit is the amount of money you are spending compared to how much you are receiving from the taxpayer.
We are drowning in debt.
Blogger Roger Amick said...
We are drowning in debt.
yup.
and almost 70% of it is driven by your beloved entitlements, alky.
socialist security, medicare, medicaid, EBT, section 8, food stamps, welfare, WIC, and every other stupid fucking program imaginable contrived from fascist delano roosevelt's new deal and LBJ's great society. all so those ni@@ers would keep voting democrat for the next 200 years.
erskine bowles and alan simpson came up with a plan to deal with all of it. and 0linsky said nah brah.
democrats respond to our "drowning in debt" by proposing ONE HUNDRED TRILLION DOLLAR$ worth of new spending, lavishing even more free shit on the freeloaders AND...
...openly expressing a desire to import several million more freeloaders from south of the border, with the promise of giving them free fucking EVERYTHING from college to free healthcare to a universal basic income. all in exchange for a democrat vote.
brilliant.
...as he awaits a childish 3rd grader nickname.
Never a fan of @justinamash, a total lightweight who opposes me and some of our great Republican ideas and policies just for the sake of getting his name out there through controversy. If he actually read the biased Mueller Report, “composed” by 18 Angry Dems who hated Trump,....
....he would see that it was nevertheless strong on NO COLLUSION and, ultimately, NO OBSTRUCTION...Anyway, how do you Obstruct when there is no crime and, in fact, the crimes were committed by the other side? Justin is a loser who sadly plays right into our opponents hands!
That’s not what Mueller said. As over 900 federal prosecutors concluded, Mueller established that he obstructed justice. If he were not president, you would have been indicted.
so impeach the motherfucker, alky.
TODAY.
find your balls and go for it.
giddy up chickenshit.
Roger
Bush's second term we averaged $478 Billion in deficits
(over his eight years we added approx $2.4 trillion in debt)
Obama's first term we averaged $1.359 Trillion in deficits
Obama's second term we averaged $580 Billion in deficits
(over his eight years we added approx $8.4 trillion in debt)
Depending on how you view it, the claim might be true as a statistical anomaly, but there is no way that Obama was fiscally sound.
Hey Roger...
The professionals whose job it is to decide these things, all decided that the issues raised by Mueller for the most part were not even obstruction as a matter of law, and where there may have been relevant law involved that he didn't come close to showing he had a case that could be brought before a jury.
You have to get two things through your thick skull.
There was no conspiracy, coordination or collusion between the Trump campaign and the people responsible for the election meddling.
A criminal case where legal experts are in open disagreement about whether or not the actions raised could even "be" criminal can never be (in good conscious) brought before a jury when you need a strong personal belief that you can prove the case to 12 jurors (at least half of which believe no crime has been committed) unanimously beyond a reasonable doubt.
The very concept that there is so much disagreement is 100% proof that the case cannot be proven unanimously.
mail order bailed for a reason, alky."
For good cause.
Alky again is Spectacularly wrong on the Debt/Deficit of the US.
As over 900 federal prosecutors concluded, Mueller established that he obstructed justice.
yet mueller himself could not bring himself to recommend indictment of trump, nor any other american for obstruction, collusion, or whatever the fuck else you guys wish to call it.
not a single american was brought up on ANY charges related to russia.
not one.
so i guess that leaves me to conclude that those 900 prosecutors are simply never trump hacks soaking in a huge vat of 'orange man bad' TDS.
furthermore, if mueller was actually serious about bringing some russians to justice, the 13 indictments he DID issue against those russian meddlers could have remained sealed and secret, which would have then afforded him the luxury of possibly arresting them here before they fled back to moscow, never to see the inside of an american courtroom or prison cell. issuance of those indictments was all for show, to give clowns like you a fresh reason to masturbate to your mueller portraits.
the whole thing was bullshit from day one, alky.
a fable concocted by the staffers of a feckless cunt to explain away the most epic and stunning political defeat in american history.
here things, all decided that the issues raised by Mueller for the most part were not even obstruction as a matter of law,
Substitute Barr and Lil Scotty for "all" decided....
FIFY lil Scottty..... now it is correct....Barr is a trump slurper, just like you!!!!
Obama's first term we averaged $1.359 Trillion in deficits
And how much of that first term is directly attributable to the busch recession.....Lil Scotty.....a percentage calculation would be sufficient.......since tax collections did not recover to busch levels until well into l his second year!!!!!
For the weak minded lil Scotty....
Fiscal 2007: $161 billion (next to last year of Bush’s second term)
Fiscal 2008: $459 billion (beginning impact from the Great Recession)
Fiscal 2009: $1.4 trillion (Obama’s first year and in the teeth of the Recession)
Fiscal 2010: $1.3 trillion
Fiscal 2011: $1.3 trillion
Fiscal 2012: $1.1 trillion
Fiscal 2013: $680 billion
Fiscal 2014: $485 billion
Fiscal 2015: $438 billion
Fiscal 2016: $587 billion
Another memory job for the weak minded lil Scotty....thanx to trump and his tax cuts.....deficits are heading back to busch recession numbers in a booming economy!!!!!
https://www.mercatus.org/publications/federal-fiscal-policy/debt-and-deficit-under-obama-administration
nnual budget deficits, which represent the federal government’s spending in excess of revenue, have begun to rise for the first time in seven years, dating back to 2009. President Obama inherited a deficit of $1.4 trillion when he took office at the end of the Great Recession. The first chart shows that deficits began to shrink as the economy slowly recovered. As of 2016 the shortfall has started growing again. The red ink increased $152 billion from last year, for a total projected deficit of $590 billion. This increase is also reflected in the fact that the deficit has resumed growing as a share of GDP for the first time since 2009.
Denny,
Other than not using the "on-budget" numbers you basically repeated what I stated, with excuses as to why Roger was wrong to suggest that Obama lowered the deficit.
Secondly, Obama didn't inherit that first budget. Congress specifically didn't pass a budget till Obama was in office. In fact, the original stimulus plan passed by congress and signed into law by Obama was a significant part of that 2009 budget.
So to suggest that somehow Bush was responsible for a budget he didn't write, that included spending that he didn't sign into law is simple case of revisionist history.
A bill that would see Texas men fined $100 (£82) for masturbating has taken a step closer to becoming law after it received its first reading in the state’s House of Representatives.
Under section 173.010 of House Bill 4260, the Man’s Right to Know Act, Texas men would only be allowed to masturbate under supervision, inside approved health care and medical facilities.
Any “unregulated masturbatory emissions outside of a woman’s vagina, or created outside of a health or medical facility, will be charged a $100 civil penalty for each emission, and will be considered an act against an unborn child, and failing to preserve the sanctity of life.”
Fiscal 2010: $1.3 trillion
Fiscal 2011: $1.3 trillion
Fiscal 2012: $1.1 trillion
Fiscal 2013: $680 billion
Fiscal 2014: $485 billion
Fiscal 2015: $438 billion
Fiscal 2016: $587 billion
Roger
I have some advice for you.... don't move to Texas. Otherwise you would have no legal sex life!
btw Roger...
I hope you realize that the Texas bill is considered satire and was proposed by a Democratic women who is attempting to turn the tables on what she feels is a government intrusion into women's sexuality.
Trump Calls Representative Justin Amash a ‘Loser’ Over Impeachment Talk
Scott, my advice from you, is to grow some balls!
btw Scott I knew that it was satire.
Scott, my advice from you, is to grow some balls!
Roger
http://watchersonthewall.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Grey-Worm-Unsullied-707.jpg
I watched the first year. Not since
The entire unsullied army has a grand whopping total of "zero" testicles.
The Republican party has a grand whopping total of "zero" testicles.
Except for a cofounder of the Freedom Caucus who has a 2 more than you have.
I liked the way Kevin McCarthy threw Amish under the bus by claiming he voted with Pelosi most of the time and therefore was a POS....Funny thing , McCarhty LIED!!!! His record for the 116th congress he voted with trump over 90% of the time!!!!! Shocking how they all got on the same page to disparage a fellow congressman with nothing but LIES.....something Lil Scotty endorses and practices.....LOLOLOLOLOL
And the lying of trump continues unabated.....and you slurpers will continue to swallow without missing a drop of his manhood....
Wonder when the rest of the right will grow a set like Amash and come out of your coma's.....but I don't hold out any hope.....BWAAAAAAAA!!!!
By Glenn Kessler
May 20 at 3:00 AM
“It now seems the General Flynn was under investigation long before was common knowledge. It would have been impossible for me to know this but, if that was the case, and with me being one of two people who would become president, why was I not told so that I could make a change?”
— President Trump, in a tweet, May 17, 2019
The president tweeted that he did not realize Michael Flynn, his first national security adviser, had been under investigation on suspicion of being a Russian agent and that he should have been warned.
This is a puzzling complaint. First, a report issued by a Republican-led House committee — often touted by Trump — disclosed in 2018 that there had been an ongoing counterintelligence investigation of Flynn. So that’s not new information. Second, Trump was warned by President Barack Obama not to hire Flynn — and the report by special counsel Robert S. Mueller III says that warning actually soured Trump on Flynn.
Here’s what we know about the warnings Trump received about Flynn. In a narrow, technical sense, Trump was not warned that Flynn was being investigated as a possible Russian agent. But there were plenty of other flashing lights that Flynn was trouble — warnings that Trump chose to ignore.
The Facts
Flynn was fired on Feb. 13, 2017, in the opening weeks of the Trump administration, after he supposedly misled Vice President Pence about a conversation with then-Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak. Flynn had claimed he had not requested the Russian government decline to respond to sanctions imposed by Obama, when, in fact, he had delivered that message and Russia had agreed. (The whole story can be seen in our compelling video above.)
Mueller secured Flynn’s guilty plea to lying to FBI agents, who, on Jan. 24, had interviewed him about his conversations with Kislyak. U.S. officials had become aware of the Flynn-Kislyak conversations because of intelligence monitoring of Kislyak, as they tried to determine why Russia had decided not to retaliate in response to the sanctions.
The House Intelligence Committee report detailed that Flynn had already been the subject of a counterintelligence investigation. It was possibly sparked by his 2015 attendance at the 10th anniversary gala in Moscow for the state-sponsored Russian television network RT, for which he earned $45,000 and was seated next to President Vladimir Putin. The Mueller report indicates a key focus was Flynn’s relationship with Kislyak: “Previously, the FBI had opened an investigation of Flynn based on his relationship with the Russian government. Flynn’s contacts with Kislyak became a key component of that investigation.”
The House committee report says the FBI had been prepared to end the counterintelligence investigation against Flynn, but then the conversation with Kislyak was discovered.
The Republican party has a grand whopping total of "zero" testicles.
The Democratic Party has a grand whopping total of "zero" brains!
Post a Comment