The fact of the matter is that Donald Trump had Epstein banned from his Maralago Club in West Palm Beach because Epstein sexually assaulted a girl at the club. There is an actual filing on record of this ban, which took place in 2011.
It certainly may be true that Donald Trump had called Epstein a fun guy who liked his women prior to this incident (or something to that extent). But when someone sexually assaults someone in your club, that tends to change your mind about that person in question.
The idea that something that Trump stated a couple of decades ago doesn't change the fact that Trump obviously disliked this guy enough to have him removed and permanently banned from one of his properties. Claiming that they are somehow "friends" or trying to tie Epstein's actions to Trump is a losing cause. Of course, that won't stop our dishonest liberal media from trying.
My favorite is the headlines stating that Epstein had ties to both Trump and Clinton, and then you open the story to find that Trump's entire "tie" was that he once called him a "terrific guy" while Clinton was known to have been on his private jet over 2 dozen times, and had also visited his so-called sex slave island.
Meanwhile descriptions of Epstein on places like Wikipedia have scrubbed any mention of his actual friendships with people like Bill Clinton. In fact, apparently Facebook and some other social media have been removing any posts or statements associating Epstein with any prominent Democrats. We are living in a gestapo media state here folks. Honesty and media integrity has taken a big back seat to politics and partisanship.
Why do so many people approve of this sort of dishonesty?
23 comments:
Which you of course take at his word......dayum, will you ever learn??? Fun guy who likes young good looking women.....BWAAAAA!!!! nothing to see there as you and trump desperately try to get some distance.....too fucking funny Lil Scotty....
Denny...
So he preemptively, knowing he would someday be President and Epstein would someday be in legal trouble...
decided to ban him from one of his clubs permanently...
as a means to "distance" himself.
Wow, Donald Trump was a pretty smart guy back in 2011 to know all of this future stuff, huh?
@Doc_0
Stalin never airbrushed a disfavored minion out of a photograph as thoroughly as DNC Media is airbrushing Bill Clinton out of the Epstein horror.
Either the Flight Records of the passengers of the Lolita Express have been Faultsified or Hillary and Bill Clinton are lying.
Princess Grey Beaver is moving up
Blocking your own obnoxious followers is totes unconstitutional and SO old fashioned. The correct procedure is to petition the Big Tech commissars to ban people you don't like. The Constitution specifically says they can block anybody they want, for any reason or no reason.
Big Tech is Big Brother
@MarkSimoneNY
Letting Jeffrey Epstein off the hook involved more than Alex Acosta. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales had to sign off on it and over at the FBI, Director Mueller and his #2 James Comey agreed to stop the FBI investigation and drop it. Schumer forgot to mention that.
---------------------------
And rumors or pressure from highly connected people...
And rumors or pressure from highly connected people...
i guaran-fucking-tee you that the clinton's fingerprints are all over letting epstein off the hook.
it seems like with each passing scandal it becomes more apparent how much feckless cunt hillary losing the election has cost the deep state.
Dennis. Be very Careful . Really, there is a huge storm headed your way.
We are living in a gestapo media state here folks. Honesty and media integrity has taken a big back seat to politics and partisanship.
Fox News Morning News.
here comes cray cray
https://amp.businessinsider.com/trump-epstein-party-at-mar-a-lago-women-2019-7rump once hosted an exclusive party with Jeffrey Epstein at his Mar-a-Lago estate, a new report says. It was just the 2 of them and '28 girls.'
David Choi Jul 10, 2019, 2:28 AM
jeffrey epstein donald trump
The American financier Jeffrey Epstein and the real-estate developer Donald Trump at Trump's Mar-a-Lago estate in Palm Beach, Florida, in 1997.Davidoff Studios/Getty Images
President Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein, the 66-year-old financier charged this week with sex trafficking and conspiracy to commit sex trafficking, were once the only attendees at a party at Trump's Mar-a-Lago resort in Palm Beach, Florida, where roughly two dozen women were brought in to entertain, a former Trump associate told The New York Times.
The women were flown in for a "calendar girl" competition that was requested by Trump, the former associate, George Houraney, told The Times.
"I said: 'Donald, this is supposed to be a party with VIPs. You're telling me it's you and Epstein?'" Houraney recalled.
Visit INSIDER's homepage for more stories.
President Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein, the 66-year-old hedge fund manager charged this week with sex trafficking and conspiracy to commit sex trafficking, were once the only other attendees at a party with roughly two dozen women at Trump's Mar-a-Lago resort in Palm Beach, Florida, a former Trump associate told The New York Times.
In 1992, the women were flown in for a "calendar girl" competition that Trump had requested, the former Trump associate, George Houraney, told The Times.
"At the very first party, I said, 'Who's coming tonight? I have 28 girls coming,'" Houraney said. "It was him and Epstein."
Pravda news coverage? His penis is so tiny that it didn't hurt me terribly!
It's all my fault!
a former Trump associate told The New York Times.
Shouldn't be too hard to track this story down and get confirmation.
Or if you are part of the dishonest liberal MSM these days, you just accept what a "former Trump associate" tells you, without any confirmation... and run the story anyways.
MD and DC AGs' Emoluments lawsuit against Trump was just thrown out.
His penis is so tiny that it didn't hurt me terribly!
It's all my fault!
hey alky -
heard from mail order lately?
no?
perhaps this is why.
I'm just going to say this to the few people I know on here who still support trump... He has doubled down on his support for Acosta's actions on this case. Think about that. A man, who manipulated, assaulted and raped young girls used his money and influence to procure a sentence less than 2 years. While allowed to leave to continue his work. Less than 2 years...
If these girls were anyone close to you. Would you feel the same? Would you allow your party alliances to override your sense of morality. This is not a conspiracy. They came to a secret agreement, without the knowledge of the victims, to allow this piece of shit to skate through his sentence than continue his life. A life of extravagance and wealth. Comfortable in his knowledge, at the time, that his money and power would get him through.
You support a man who supports this miscarriage of justice.
This man, leads our govt and our military.
If I am judged by my actions as a man. Who gives the elite the right to circumvent the same scrutiny?
Something to think about. Or maybe not.
In my experience. Not thinking is the easy way to live.
Kinda sucks when you're wrong. In this circumstance, the proof is all there. Twitter, news reports, court documents. Your God is supporting a man who allowed a sex offender off easy, to continue his abuse.
fucktrupasshole.com alky?
really?
just when i think your descent into madness is complete, you show us that you might still have a ways to go.
Mr. Epstein is back in a holding cell, under indictment by a U.S. attorney in New York. He will have his day in court. Presumably we will find out whether the evidence against the hedge-fund impresario for sexually abusing numerous underage girls in the early 2000s is as strong as it seems.
But one element of the story should give us pause, and that’s the seemingly concerted effort by the press to make a secondary villain out of the only prosecutor who succeeded in holding Mr. Epstein accountable till now because, 12 years later, that prosecutor is Donald Trump’s labor secretary.
A much-cited story in the Miami Herald last November is headlined “How a future Trump Cabinet member gave a serial sex abuser the deal of a lifetime.” The paper thereby invokes a previously unknown form of retroactive quantum action at a distance, since Alexander Acosta’s actions as a U.S. attorney in Florida in 2007 could not have been premised on Mr. Trump being president a decade later.
The headline is also misleading. In fact, the Herald’s 5,000-word exposé tells us very little about the reasons and circumstances behind the 2008 plea deal in which Mr. Epstein agreed to plead guilty to two felonies, serve an 18-month jail sentence, pay restitution to certain victims, and accept designation for life as a registered sex offender.
Instead, the paper tells us what its own sources are willing to say now about Mr. Epstein more than a decade after the prosecution. What a newspaper can report in 2018 and what a prosecutor can prove in 2007 are two very different things. A fact the Herald also should have made plain: It was precisely Mr. Epstein’s conviction at the hands of Mr. Acosta that helped fuel the filing of civil lawsuits and emergence of newly declared victims that became the basis for the Herald’s own reporting.
Making an even bigger joke of the paper’s positioning of Mr. Acosta as Mr. Epstein’s protector is this glaring fact: It wasn’t Mr. Acosta but New York County’s district attorney—a member of the city’s ruling Democratic elite, with the illustrious name of Cyrus Vance Jr.—who in 2011 sought to undo Mr. Acosta’s work by relieving Mr. Epstein of his Level 3 sex offender status in New York state.
But then Mr. Vance is not a member of the Trump administration. . . .
It also bears asking: Would the Herald even have invested in reporting the Epstein story if it couldn’t also have flounced up an anti-Trump angle?
Yes, it’s been rough couple of decades for the newspaper business. At the kindest, the Herald should have had the confidence to rest its claim to public attention on what it had to reveal about Mr. Epstein’s behavior rather than trying so pathetically to annex its reporting to an au courant anti-Trump narrative.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/trump-and-the-sex-offender-11562713152?
by the press to make a secondary villain out of the only prosecutor who succeeded in holding Mr. Epstein accountable till now because
BWAAAAAAAA!!!! Accountable for shit, asshole....The same data was available years ago and the rich man bought his way out of trouble, just like donnie did with his bone spurs....money talks and you losers just keep slurping!!!!!!! Too fucking stupid for words...!!!!
@Rockprincess818
Epstein is a democrat donor. Why are all of these democrat donors involved with rape, murder and pedophilia?
#Weinstein #EdBuck #TerryBean #Weiner
ockprincess818
Epstein is a democrat donor.
SO WAS TRUMP SHIT FOR BRAINS>>>>!!!!!! Who the fuck posts this drivel other than the goat fucking idiot??????
Hey lo iq "anonymous"
I love "retweeting" posts from twitter.
Especially once I noticed I got your "goat"
Should have known with your "intellect" you would never figure that out.
ROFLMFAO !!!
@TimRunsHisMouth
AOC called Nancy Pelosi racist.
America is about to have a popcorn shortage.
What a beautiful day watching more fireworks than Trump had on the 4th. WINNING !!!
Post a Comment