Why are the Democrats so upset?
- Donald Trump may have "welcomed" help from the Russians
- Hillary Clinton and the DNC "sought" help from the Russians
- The help Donald Trump received was effective, because it was real information that actually mattered.
- The help Hillary Clinton and the DNC "sought" and received was ineffective because it was quite literally fake irrelevant gossip.
So when it boils down to it, Donald Trump got real help in the form of real dirt coming out against his opponent, but did literally nothing to secure it. Meanwhile Hillary Clinton and the DNC got fake help in the form of fake information, and paid good money to secure it.
The reason Democrats are mad is because they tried to cheat, their cheating didn't work, and they lost to someone who benefitted from the truth. Oddly, they believe that this entitles them to investigate the real information that worked, and even if they cannot tie Trump to any of it... they still want to impeach him for basically doing little more than winnning.
22 comments:
Another broken promise and pipe dream of the slurpers.....3% growth shot to hell due to trump tariffs and shitty policy!!!!!
The middling results could pose a problem for Trump, who promised the economy could grow at 3 percent — or higher — every year during his tenure and is making the economy a centerpiece of his reelection campaign.
Still, Trump described Friday’s report as “not bad” and predicted that the economy is “set to zoom.” But many economists say the nation appears to be settling back into a level of just over 2 percent annual growth, which they describe as solid but not extraordinary, since it has been the norm for much of the recovery.
The return to Obama like growth that will now be acceptable to those you think trump is GOD!!!!! BWAAAAAAAA!!! Lost trump years due to broken promises!!!
Not that it matters....the wall funding decision for standing is just another excuse by the conservative court....The case ain't over yet as the congress can surely maske life miserable for the victory and non exonerated felon in chief!!!!!
With this type of news it is surprising the stock market continues its rise.....wonder when that will change????? Especially with Boeing and its Max 8 issue!!! Do you realize what a hit to O/H's that will be if they stop that line????? Wow!!!
Last quarter, the economy was helped by a surge in consumer and federal government spending, but business investment turned negative for the first time since early 2016.
Many executives blame uncertainty around Trump’s trade war for their hesitancy to spend as much as they did a year ago. The plunge in corporate spending has been especially evident in the manufacturing sector, which fell into a “technical recession” in the first half of the year as equipment purchases dried up.
Poor Denny is trying to make a bogus point because it's all he has. It's been a bad week for him.
Democrats Just Delivered a Perfectly Confusing Message On Impeachment
Asked Friday if their latest lawsuit for Mueller's underlying evidence marked an escalation over where they were yesterday, Nadler responded, “Yes,” then he paused to consider. “ I don’t know.”
“It's not an impeachment inquiry,” Escobar told VICE News. “But it is an impeachment investigation.”
https://news.vice.com/en_us/article/evyjnz/democrats-just-delivered-a-perfectly-confusing-message-on-impeachment?utm_source=vicenewstwitter
I can see why lo iq is a democrat.
ROFLMFAO !!!
The case ain't over yet as the congress can surely maske life miserable for the victory and non exonerated felon in chief!!!!!
Not only is the case over Denny...
But Trump now has the proverbial ace in the hole. If Congress doesn't fund his wall, then he builds it himself.
Congress looks better now if they simply give him the money, pretend it's their idea, and try to claim the higher ground.
The case ain't over yet
dumb fuck,
the USSC is the highest court in the land. when they take up a case and rule on it, the case is - by definition - OVER.
now then, congress can continue to fuck with trump on this issue. and if they choose to do so, all they're doing is facilitating his re-election. not that he needs the help at this point anyway.
dumb fuck,
You need to pay attention aaahole.;....There is another case pending for the wall that could cause the funding to dry uo....Try to keep up you dumb fuck instead of being the moronic dick sucker you are!!!!!! BWAAAAAAAA!!!!
Not only is the case over Denny..
BWAAAAA!!! Just the sierra club case.... try and get your head out of trumps old fat stinking ass and wake up!!!!
There is another case pending for the wall that could cause the funding to dry uo....
really.
so tell us more about this fictional "case."
here you go dumb fuck -
The border wall case, Trump v. Sierra Club, No. 19A60, concerned injunctions entered by a trial judge that blocked the transfer of military funds to wall construction. An appeals court refused to stay the trial judge’s ruling while it considered the administration’s appeal. The Supreme Court’s ruling on Friday allows construction to proceed while the litigation continues.
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/26/us/politics/supreme-court-border-wall-trump.html
is this what you were BWAHAHA-ing about?
Amusing polls for those who think trump and R's are in way over their heads.....Deep red Ohio polls show voters opposed to a heartbeat bill and are for background checks for guns......Go figure especially with Biden showing a double digit lead against the felon in chief in the state!!!!
https://www.dispatch.com/news/20190726/poll-ohioans-oppose-heartbeat-law-favor-gun-background-checks
I know Lil Scotty will say it does not matter, but his mind is shot and has gone away!!!
here you go dumb fuck -
Hey asswipe....That is exactly what I said....the sierra club is over....learn how to read and keep up.....Your stupidity today is overwhelming!!!!
so tell us more about this fictional "case."
There are eminent domain cases Try the google machine using Pending Southern Wall cases....you actually might learn something you fucking moronic idiot!!!!!!
Like I said, it ain't over by any stretch....but go ahead rat and tell me otherwise....I am sure to be amused!!!!!!
https://www.outsidethebeltway.com/supreme-court-backs-trump-on-border-wall-funding-for-now/
administrative action,” Justice Breyer wrote, “but leave it in place insofar as it precludes the government from disbursing those funds or beginning construction.”
Amy Howe comments at SCOTUSBlog:
The government urged the justices to allow it to go ahead and use the Pentagon funds for border-wall construction while it appeals the district court’s ruling to the 9th Circuit. It stressed the need to build the wall “to stanch the flow of illegal narcotics across the southern border,” and it urged the court to act on its request by July 26: If the construction contracts are not finalized by September 30, when the fiscal year ends, the government explained, they will no longer be available.
The challengers pushed back, countering that because Congress had declined to allocate money for the border wall, the government could not transfer money from the Pentagon to the Department of Homeland Security. Moreover, they added, once construction of the wall begins, “there will be no turning back.”
Tonight the Supreme Court granted the government’s request and put the lower court’s ruling on hold to give the government time to appeal. In a brief unsigned order, the court explained that, among other things, the government had made the showing required at this preliminary stage of the case that the Sierra Club and the SBCC may not be the right plaintiffs to challenge the reallocation of the funds.
Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan indicated that they would have denied the government’s request.
In a separate opinion, Justice Stephen Breyer noted that the challengers had argued that the construction of the wall would harm the environment, while the government had argued that its request should be granted to avoid a scenario in which the funds for the wall were no longer available after September 30 because the construction contracts had not been finalized. Breyer explained that he would have split the difference and allowed the government to finalize the contracts but not to begin construction.
Ilya Somin at The Volokh Conspiracy meanwhile notes, correctly, that this is hardly the end of the road for legal challenges to the funding for the border wall:
As is the usual practice with stay rulings, the majority issued very little in the way of an explanation. But it did indicate that “[a]mong the reasons is that the Government has made a sufficient showing at this stage that the plaintiffs have no cause of action to obtain review of the Acting Secretary’s compliance with Section 8005 [of the the 2019 Department of Defense Appropriations Act].”
In other words, this seems to be a purely a procedural ruling suggesting that the majority justices think the plaintiffs in the case—the Sierra Club and the Southern Border Community Coalition an alliance of various liberal/progressive groups in the border area—lacked the procedural right to challenge the diversion of funds. The Court may be referring here to Judge N. Randy Smith’s argument in his dissent in the Ninth Circuit ruling on this issue, where he argued that only plaintiffs with “economic interests” at stake are legally permitted to challenge the funding diversion. In my view, Judge Smith’s distinction between “economic” and “recreational” interests in dubious. The Court should have simply denied the stay, or at least adopted Justice Breyer’s approach.
The little pissy punk gets bitch slapped in court....now maybe his old man should tan his little white hide like he should have weeks ago!!!!
A federal judge on Friday dismissed a $250 million lawsuit against The Washington Post from the attorneys of Nick Sandmann, the MAGA hat-wearing teen captured in a viral video with Native American activist Nathan Phillips in January.
A student at Covington Catholic High School in Kentucky, Sandmann was part of a group of teens filmed surrounding Phillips while he performed an American Indian Movement song on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial early this year.
In interviews following the incident, Phillips claimed Sandmann and the other students swarmed him as he was trying to prevent potential violence between the teens and a group identified as Hebrew Israelites.
In a story titled “‘It was getting ugly’: Native American drummer speaks on his encounter with MAGA-hat-wearing teens,” Phillips told the Post that Sandmann stood in his way as he looked for an exit route.
“It was getting ugly, and I was thinking: ‘I’ve got to find myself an exit out of this situation and finish my song at the Lincoln Memorial,’” Phillips recalled in the story. “I started going that way, and that guy in the hat [Sandmann] stood in my way, and we were at an impasse.”
Sandmann later disputed Phillips’ account and claimed that he, too, had been trying to defuse a potentially volatile situation. In February, the student’s lawyers Lin Wood and Todd McMurtry argued in a lawsuit that the Post “wrongfully targeted and bullied” Sandmann “because he was the white, Catholic student wearing a red ‘Make America Great Again’ souvenir cap.”
But in his ruling on Friday, U.S. District Judge William Bertelsman wrote that the lawsuit’s claims are “not supported by the plain language in the article.”
Sign up for Breaking News by AOL to get the latest breaking news alerts and updates delivered straight to your inbox.
“The Court accepts Sandmann’s statement that, when he was standing motionless in the confrontation with Phillips, his intent was to calm the situation and not to impede or block anyone,” Bertelsman wrote.
The judge continued: “However, Phillips did not see it that way. He concluded that he was being ‘blocked’ and not allowed to ‘retreat.’ He passed these conclusions on to The Post. They may have been erroneous, but ... they are opinion protected by the First Amendment.”
Angry Fat Man, how us doing?
The lost years are back!
On Friday, the Commerce Department reported that the country’s gross domestic product expanded at a middling 2.1 percent annual rate during the the second quarter, down from 3.1 percent over the first three months of 2019.
Nope, Roger Obama Lost Years are not back.
You are as ignorant as ever on all things, financial and Economic.
GDP up 2.1%, better then expected.
Better then the long 8 lost years of 1.9%.
4.5 Million less Ameicans on Food Stamps.
Nope. Not your King Obama's Lost Years.
The Court should have simply denied the stay, or at least adopted Justice Breyer’s approach.
Hmmmm... but they didn't. They allowed the funds to allocated, and construction to begin. Obviously the majority members of the USSC neither agreed with this author, the 9th circuit court, or Justice Breyer.
The general concept of whether or not someone is granted a stay is based on whether or not the court believes that their chances of winning are better than not, and whether or not they risk real damage if the stay is not put in place.
Obviously the lower court believed that the Plaintiffs were going to prevail and that building the wall would harm the plaintiffs (for obvious reasons) so they gave them temporary relief. The USSC shot back with their own opinion that it was unlikely that the group has any real standing to sue.
A lower court Judge can rule however they decide moving forward, but unless that decision is upheld by the USSC it won't matter, and the Judge will not be issuing any additional relief for the plaintiffs. In fact, this is one of those situation where the lower court will likely rule in favor of the plaintiffs (just to be a big fat resistant turd) and immediately stay their own ruling to allow for the appeal (knowing that they will likely be overturned).
An adult Judge would look at the USSC decision and likely follow their lead and rule that the plaintiffs are missing standing (and avoid all the rest of the nonsense). But we don't have many adult Judges these days in the 9th.
I have to wonder if he loses the election by a narrow margin, because he is facing criminal charges once he is no longer President, will he sign an executive order to declare the election was fraudulent?
And more importantly, will his pathologically effected supporters stand behind his six and follow orders and support him for another term?
From some of the things I have seen here, make me wonder if our Constitution is nul and void is acceptable to keep the Democrats out of the office?��
Only people who supported the illegal attempted overthrow of the president of the United States fear this.
Because they are the only ones who can conceive it.
Post a Comment