Saturday, August 17, 2019

Liberal White Males are in a co-dependent relationship with the Democratic Party

Liberal White Males have to remember that this behavior is not healthy 
Codependent relationships involve an unequal situation in which one partner makes it his or her responsibility to ensure the happiness of the other. These types of people often seek out those who are needy; in many cases, the other person will engage in self-destructive behavior, such as alcoholism. The first partner will become the caretaker for the other, many times enabling the destructive behaviors by making excuses or providing resources for it to continue. Even if the relationship does not involve such behavior, one person still will constantly give everything to keep the other person satisfied, often feeling compelled to find solutions for him or her and anticipate the person's needs.
Another characteristic of codependent relationships is one person's repression of his or her own needs in deference to the other's needs. These people feel uncomfortable putting themselves first; they are much more comfortable focusing on the needs of their partners. Even if they feel anger or resentment that their needs are not met, they will bury those emotions and put all of their energy into pleasing their partners. They also tend to deny that they are in a bad, inequitable situation and ignore the pain it is causing them. This often leads them to feel depressed and may lead them to their own self-destructive behaviors.
The people who are the constant caretakers in codependent relationships often suffer from a lack of self-esteem as well. They only see themselves as valuable when they are involved in a relationship, even if it is negative and destructive, and define their lives based on this. They may only feel validated by love and approval from their partner, who many times will not or cannot provide it. If they leave their codependent relationships, they often will seek out the same type of person again and end up in the same situation.

Look, we can all see why people like "The Squad" are liberals. They would like the country to bend to their will, change to their whims, and please them. They represent others with the same viewpoints. They want to bring in more Somalis, more Muslims, more Hispanics, more Blacks and want a country that specifically caters to the whims and desires of those factions. This requires a heavy handed government that will step in and uproot the basic fundamental principles of life, liberty and and the "pursuit" of happiness, and replace it with income redistribution, robust government services, and some sort of pie in the sky "guarantee" of happiness. Certainly it's much harder (if not all together impossible) to get this all done with little more than hard work and personal responsibility.

So this is the major constituency of the Democratic Party:

  • Minorities - Vote three to one in favor of Democrats
  • Immigrants - Vote three to one in favor of Democrats 
  • The Poor - Under $50K/year vote Democrat by approx 15 points
  • LGBTQ - Vote five to one in favor of Democrats
  • Felons - Seventy percent of convicted felons are registered as Democrats
  • Unmarried  - Vote three to two in favor of Democrats
  • Non-Christian - Other religions vote two to one in favor of Democrats
  • Atheists -  Vote three to one in favor of Democrats 
  • Post graduate degrees - Vote three to two in favor of Democrats 

Now to be clear, I am not against any of those people. I am married to a minority immigrant, I grew up fairly poor, I have many LGBTQ friends, I have a relative who is a convicted felon, and I am myself an Atheist. But let's be realistic. Most of those groups (as a whole) are quite literally against me as a conservative white male. How much should I cater to people who have literally zero interest in meeting me even close to half way? Catering to them would be an unhealthy one sided relationship. 

The reality is that healthy well adjusted people live their lives with the normal thought process that they want to both be happy, take care of those around them, and of course try to leave the world in a better place than when they left it. They want to do this as responsible members of society. Healthy people do not want to be a burden on others, rely on handouts from others, and they most certainly do not blame others for their own failures. 

Healthy people do not feel guilt over how they were born, what race they are, what sex they are, or what age they are. Healthy people do not chastise themselves at their "privilege" or look to provide other people with "reparations" because they feel guilty over things that happened over a century ago. 

Healthy people do not knowingly work against their own self interest, which in turn works against the self interests of their families, their children, and maybe even their children's children. Healthy people put their responsibilities to themselves, and their families first. In order to be truly a helpful member of any society, you first have to be a healthy member of that society. 

A society full of healthy people who take responsibility, take care of themselves and their family, who are good neighbors and citizens, do not commit crimes, do not demand handouts, and do not rely or blame others is a healthy society that will prosper. A society full of unhealthy people who expect others to take care of them and their families, blame others for their failures, and expect others to feel guilt for their lot in life is a society that will never function. The more healthy people you have, the easier it is to take care of the unhealthy. The less healthy people you have, the harder it becomes to take care of the unhealthy and eventually your society crashes and burns.

The reality is that we all know white male liberals. Is it a coincidence that most of them are unhappy, guilty, and generally pissed off at the world. How many of your white male liberal friends appear happy or well adjusted? Have we have all not witnessed people who fall into this category lose important things in their lives, largely because their undying one sided devotion to their Democratic Party (who spits in their face). Have we not seen people who claim to be spiritual Christians who set aside the very teachings they claim to follow, because they do not correspond to what their precious Democratic Party is telling them today. 

The question is the classic chicken or egg dilemma. Does the typical white male liberal becomes so because they prone to and crave a co-dependent relationship where they can be used and abused, or does being a liberal in general create the co-dependency after the fact? 

27 comments:

Oh,I hope not, James said...

Trump Tax Cut Isn’t Giving Economy a Boost
August 16, 2019 at 2:08 pm EDT

John Harwood: “If ever the U.S. economy could use a strong tax cut tail wind, it could use one now as conditions weaken around the world.”

“But the tail wind isn’t there.”

“Instead, benefits from what President Trump called “the biggest reform of all time” to the tax code have dwindled to a faint breeze just 20 months after its enactment. Half of corporate chief financial officers surveyed by Duke University expect the economy to shrink by the second quarter of 2020. Two-thirds expect a recession by the end of next year.

Anonymous said...

Two Indicators That Mask Trump’s Economy
August 16, 2019 at 9:32 am EDT By Taegan Goddard 43 Comments

Leo Hindery: “The truth is that the numbers that Trump holds up as proof of a thriving economy are masking an economy that, according to the two most credible early indicators, is actually on the precipice of a recession. One indicator is how Treasury bonds are doing, and Wednesday things went badly. The yield on 10-year bonds fell below the rate on the 2-year Treasury bond — this phenomenon, known as an inverted yield curve, has always been a reliable early indicator of a recession because it best reflects bondholders’ short-term expectations for the economy.”

“The other indicator is unemployment. Despite an official Bureau of Labor Statistics unemployment count of 6.1 million unemployed workers, the real unemployed worker figure is more like 11.5 million. By not counting the 1.5 million ‘marginally attached’ and ‘discouraged’ workers, and especially by not counting the 4 million workers who are ‘part-time-of-necessity,’ Trump’s official figure fails to capture the severe economic pain still being felt by far too many workers.”

Neil Irwin said...

How the Recession of 2020 Could Happen

Neil Irwin: “So if there’s going to be a recession in 2020 — if the pessimistic signals in the financial markets prove correct — how would it happen? There are plenty of clues, in the details of recent economic reports, in signals from the markets, and in the recent history of recessions and near recessions.”

“President Trump’s on-again-off-again execution of the trade war with China and other countries has fed uncertainty into businesses’ decision-making. Corporate investment spending is softening, despite the big tax cut that Mr. Trump said would boost it. And the combination of central banks that are at the outer limits of their ability to stimulate growth, and an inward turn by many countries, could make governments less effective at responding to a downturn.”

anonymous said...

Wise geek.....hate to tell you Lil Scotty....but it seems to me faux news is more credible......BWAAAAAAAAAA!!!! What else are you going to believe in.....The easter bunny????? BTW....I didn't bother reading your bullshit after vetting your source!!!!!


Wisegeek.com. WP:RSN discussion has described it as a "content farm" that pays its writers to produce "breezy, popular interest pieces with no footnotes" based on popular search terms, and concern was expressed that it may be drawing uncredited information from Wikipedia and creating an information loop.

Review of wise geek....

Some of the staff bios look legit, others, I’m not so sure. I would take whatever I read there with a grain of salt. I have two issues with WiseGEEK articles:

You never know who actually wrote it
They never cite any sources
Why not put the author(s)? Then I could look at that specific writer’s bio and judge how reliable it is.

And for sources, I’m sure they’re getting their information from reliable sources, so why don’t they just cite them? All they have are links to other WiseGEEK articles. Not very helpful. Plus, I sometimes want to dive deeper into a topic they’ve written about, and if they cited their sources, it would give me a great starting point.

The Cold Hearted Proof said...


Liberal White Males are in a co-dependent relationship with the Democratic Party

Liberal White Males have to remember that this behavior is not healthy


Exhibit A and Exhibit B

anonymous said...


Exhibit A and Exhibit B reflect the fact that you and Lil Scotty are clueless old white males with limited intellectual capacity!!!! BWAAAAAAAA!!!!

anonymous said...

Yep rat you dumb fuck....everyone should be armed!!!!!......BWAAAAAAAA!!!!


A white Arkansas woman who pulled a gun on four black teenagers who were going door-to-door fundraising for their high school last week was arrested Monday and charged with assault.
Police in Wynne, about 100 miles northeast of Little Rock, responded to a “suspicious persons” report and found four teens on the ground and Jerri Kelly standing over them with a gun, according to WMC-TV.


After police let the kids stand up, they explained they were selling discount cards to raise money for their high school’s football team. The Wynne School District later confirmed that two of the children were wearing football jerseys.
Kelly, 46, was charged with aggravated assault, false imprisonment and endangering the welfare of a minor, according to WMC.

BWAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!! said...

BWAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!

BWAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!! said...

BWAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!

anonymous said...

The peaceful hacks of the right emulating their unindicted felon leader like a bunch of anonymous pigs....so sad...especially for frauds like the goat fucking idiot who advocates violence!!!

Dave Maclean,The Independent 1 hour 59 minutes ago

The mayor of Dayton, Ohio - where nine people were murdered this month in a mass shooting - was given a round-the-clock security detail following her war of words with Donald Trump.

Initially, a two-person team of detectives guarded Nan Whaley for six days after they sparred, the Dayton Daily News reports.

The precaution was made following a deluge of hate-filled messages received after she verbally sparred with the president after his visit to a hospital in the city earlier this month.

Ms Whaley, President Trump and Senator Sherrod Brown visited shooting victims, survivors and first responders at Miami Valley Hospital on August 7, three days after the attack.

Shortly afterward, Whaley and Brown held a press conference where they urged the president to support and sign legislation requiring background checks on gun purchases and other reforms.

Ms Whaley added that first responders and victims were grateful the president had come to Dayton.

But later that day, Mr Trump wrote on Twitter that Whaley and Brown “misrepresented” what took place inside the hospital.

"Their news conference after I left for El Paso was a fraud. It bore no resemblance to what took place with those incredible people that I was so lucky to meet and spend time with.”

She responded by calling him a bully and a coward.

anonymous said...

Anonymous BWAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!! said...


Not very original there sport....probably another old white man with shit for brains....

BWAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!! said...


BWAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!

BWAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!

BWAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!

Commonsense said...

The mayor of Dayton, Ohio

Made an ass of herself. What did she expect, hearts and flowers?

Republican politicians have suffered far worse for far less.

And yet somehow it was buried by the media.

Commonsense said...

A white Arkansas woman who pulled a gun on four black teenagers who were going door-to-door fundraising for their high school last week was arrested Monday and charged with assault.

I somewhat suspect the charges will be dropped but not until the judge gives her a good tongue lashing for not using the common sense God gave her.

C.H. Truth said...

Denny -

The article linked is simply a description of codependency in general. Same as you will find it most anywhere. It only "seems" like it is specific toward liberal white males and the Democratic Party, because... well it is.

That website does not promote the idea of the liberal white males / Democratic Party codependency. That is just my own take on things.

But the fact that it made you angry is proof enough for me!

Anonymous said...

Denny and Jane want psi and economic suffering upon their fellow American .

Anonymous said...

Black Shooters Lives Matter to Socialist Democrats .
"Friday night in North Philadelphia to support Maurice Hill, the alleged gunman accused of shooting six Philadelphia police officers. "

cowardly king obama said...


Could be what's up with Roger.

Libs have destroyed California.

https://www.ocregister.com/2018/09/08/a-generation-plans-an-exodus-from-california/

cowardly king obama said...

o/t New Video : Fakest July On Record (worth watching)

https://realclimatescience.com/2019/08/new-video-fakest-july-on-record/

Anonymous said...

John Hickenlooper in a press release said " I feel like a winner, I got a Participation Trophy "

Anonymous said...

Can we please give the Face of the Socialist Democrat Party more air time.
The Squatters are a flaming train wreck.

"Maybe folks should boycott his show.

I am tired of folks discrediting a form of speech that is centered on equality and freedom. This is exactly how they tried to discredit & stop the boycott to stand up against the apartheid in S. Africa. It didn't work then and it won't now. "

Historically Fucktarded.

anonymous said...

Yep....This is an opinion piece from a PM of a Northern Country.....but the basis of the piece is founded in many irrefutable facts that the mental midgets of the right ignore as the stick their heads up an old white mans fat ass!!!!!!

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/17/opinion/iceland-glacier-climate-change.html?action=click&module=Opinion&pgtype=Homepage

Eyjafjallajokull, Iceland’s sixth-largest glacier, gained worldwide recognition when the volcano lurking under it erupted in 2010. Large levels of volcanic ash caused air travel disruptions in Europe, and news reporters across the world struggled with the difficult pronunciation of Eyjafjallajokull, much to the amusement of us native speakers. A less-known and less-tongue-twisting glacier is Ok, which is on a mountaintop in Western Iceland.

But Ok is no longer a glacier.

The ice field that covered the mountain in 1900 — close to six square miles — has now been replaced by a crater lake. It is certainly beautiful, surrounded by patchy snowfields, and is now the highest lake in Iceland. But that beauty quickly fades in the eyes of anyone who knows what was there before and why it is no longer there. Ok’s disappearance is yet another testimony of irreversible global climate change.

On Aug. 18, I will join a group of artists and scientists — along with the former president of Ireland and climate activist Mary Robinson — on a trip to bid farewell to Ok. This trip will include the installation of a memorial shield that reads:

anonymous said...

https://realclimatescience.com/2019/08/new-video-fakest-july-on-record/


BWAAAAAAAAA!!!!! Hosted by Tony Heller aka Steve Goddard who is a non scientist right wing uneducated troll!!!!! Yep sure is a great fake video!!!!!! Thanx for posting another POS !!!

Anonymous said...

Same level of Education as I do. More then, James, Dopie and well broke Roger.


"Masters in Electrical Engineering - Rice University. BS Geology - ASU. "

anonymous said...

Blogger KD said...
Same level of Education as I do.


BWAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!! You fucking lying sack of shitt.......EE is not a scientist.....assfucking hole....

C.H. Truth said...

Well Denny...

Considering about 95% of all global warming predictions are concocted through computer generated climate models, you best understand programming. mathematics and statistics or you could be completely fooled by what these things say.

Either way, there is nothing that suggests you have an original thought about global warming. All you are is a parrot of those whom you have decided to put your blind trust in. The fact that they have gotten pretty much everything wrong going back to the 1990's continues to be missed by you.

So perhaps if you had an understanding of math and statistics, you would understand that the formulas in these models are guesses and the results are no better or no worse than the numbers that fill in these formulas (which are also a guess).

So a guess within a guess so to speak.

Moreover, the odds of all of these models overstating global warming for upwards of 30 years now cannot be explained by any statistical glitch. When it is this consistent, there is a constant within the models and numbers that can pretty much be accounted for. That constant is political bias and the result remains that they have, do, and always will consistently overstate everything.

You only need to see the numbers, Denny.
The reasoning behind them is completely irrelevant.

Just as a good statistician can provide valuable information on a particular sport (baseball, football, basketball), without having to understand how to play the sport him/herself.

Commonsense said...

The fact that they have gotten pretty much everything wrong going back to the 1990's continues to be missed by you.

So perhaps if you had an understanding of math and statistics, you would understand that the formulas in these models are guesses and the results are no better or no worse than the numbers that fill in these formulas (which are also a guess).


The astrology channel has a better track record.