Liberal White Males are in a co-dependent relationship with the Democratic Party

Liberal White Males have to remember that this behavior is not healthy 

Codependent relationships involve an unequal situation in which one partner makes it his or her responsibility to ensure the happiness of the other. These types of people often seek out those who are needy; in many cases, the other person will engage in self-destructive behavior, such as alcoholism. The first partner will become the caretaker for the other, many times enabling the destructive behaviors by making excuses or providing resources for it to continue. Even if the relationship does not involve such behavior, one person still will constantly give everything to keep the other person satisfied, often feeling compelled to find solutions for him or her and anticipate the person's needs.

Another characteristic of codependent relationships is one person's repression of his or her own needs in deference to the other's needs. These people feel uncomfortable putting themselves first; they are much more comfortable focusing on the needs of their partners. Even if they feel anger or resentment that their needs are not met, they will bury those emotions and put all of their energy into pleasing their partners. They also tend to deny that they are in a bad, inequitable situation and ignore the pain it is causing them. This often leads them to feel depressed and may lead them to their own self-destructive behaviors.

The people who are the constant caretakers in codependent relationships often suffer from a lack of self-esteem as well. They only see themselves as valuable when they are involved in a relationship, even if it is negative and destructive, and define their lives based on this. They may only feel validated by love and approval from their partner, who many times will not or cannot provide it. If they leave their codependent relationships, they often will seek out the same type of person again and end up in the same situation.

Look, we can all see why people like "The Squad" are liberals. They would like the country to bend to their will, change to their whims, and please them. They represent others with the same viewpoints. They want to bring in more Somalis, more Muslims, more Hispanics, more Blacks and want a country that specifically caters to the whims and desires of those factions. This requires a heavy handed government that will step in and uproot the basic fundamental principles of life, liberty and and the "pursuit" of happiness, and replace it with income redistribution, robust government services, and some sort of pie in the sky "guarantee" of happiness. Certainly it's much harder (if not all together impossible) to get this all done with little more than hard work and personal responsibility.

So this is the major constituency of the Democratic Party:

• Minorities - Vote three to one in favor of Democrats
• Immigrants - Vote three to one in favor of Democrats 
• The Poor - Under $50K/year vote Democrat by approx 15 points
• LGBTQ - Vote five to one in favor of Democrats
• Felons - Seventy percent of convicted felons are registered as Democrats
• Unmarried  - Vote three to two in favor of Democrats
• Non-Christian - Other religions vote two to one in favor of Democrats
• Atheists -  Vote three to one in favor of Democrats 
• Post graduate degrees - Vote three to two in favor of Democrats 

Now to be clear, I am not against any of those people. I am married to a minority immigrant, I grew up fairly poor, I have many LGBTQ friends, I have a relative who is a convicted felon, and I am myself an Atheist. But let's be realistic. Most of those groups (as a whole) are quite literally against me as a conservative white male. How much should I cater to people who have literally zero interest in meeting me even close to half way? Catering to them would be an unhealthy one sided relationship. 

The reality is that healthy well adjusted people live their lives with the normal thought process that they want to both be happy, take care of those around them, and of course try to leave the world in a better place than when they left it. They want to do this as responsible members of society. Healthy people do not want to be a burden on others, rely on handouts from others, and they most certainly do not blame others for their own failures. 

Healthy people do not feel guilt over how they were born, what race they are, what sex they are, or what age they are. Healthy people do not chastise themselves at their "privilege" or look to provide other people with "reparations" because they feel guilty over things that happened over a century ago. 

Healthy people do not knowingly work against their own self interest, which in turn works against the self interests of their families, their children, and maybe even their children's children. Healthy people put their responsibilities to themselves, and their families first. In order to be truly a helpful member of any society, you first have to be a healthy member of that society. 

A society full of healthy people who take responsibility, take care of themselves and their family, who are good neighbors and citizens, do not commit crimes, do not demand handouts, and do not rely or blame others is a healthy society that will prosper. A society full of unhealthy people who expect others to take care of them and their families, blame others for their failures, and expect others to feel guilt for their lot in life is a society that will never function. The more healthy people you have, the easier it is to take care of the unhealthy. The less healthy people you have, the harder it becomes to take care of the unhealthy and eventually your society crashes and burns.

The reality is that we all know white male liberals. Is it a coincidence that most of them are unhappy, guilty, and generally pissed off at the world. How many of your white male liberal friends appear happy or well adjusted? Have we have all not witnessed people who fall into this category lose important things in their lives, largely because their undying one sided devotion to their Democratic Party (who spits in their face). Have we not seen people who claim to be spiritual Christians who set aside the very teachings they claim to follow, because they do not correspond to what their precious Democratic Party is telling them today. 

The question is the classic chicken or egg dilemma. Does the typical white male liberal becomes so because they prone to and crave a co-dependent relationship where they can be used and abused, or does being a liberal in general create the co-dependency after the fact?