 |
| This is why the Democrats are so desperate for any new scandal! |
Oh... and let's not forget, the same people who were leaking this situation to the press already know what the Horowitz report is going to say. If it was good for their side, they would be leaking that instead of this (which make no mistake, is an attempted distraction).
17 comments:
@AnnCoulter
Wouldn't it be funny if the whistleblower were Christine Blasey Ford?
I want to see transcripts for Obama's calls.
Goose....gander...
Anybody have that Alky to English Program?
"I will not be surprised that he will not actually said. He will claim that executive authority, is going to prohibit the release of the transcript"
your predictions suck like your life.
It's probably a good thing that President Trump was busy at the United Nations on Tuesday, because the frequent Fox News viewer wouldn't have liked what he heard during anchor Shep Smith's afternoon show.
Smith was joined by Judge Andrew Napolitano, the network's senior judicial analyst. His appearance came shortly before House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) announced she directed the House to launch a formal impeachment inquiry against Trump, and Smith asked Napolitano about all sorts of scenarios involving Trump and his phone call to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, and whether they would be crimes. Trump has admitted he requested Zelensky investigate the son of 2020 presidential candidate and former Vice President Joe Biden, and Napolitano said that yes, "it is a crime for the president to solicit aid for his campaign from a foreign government."
The whistleblower who brought attention to the call went through the proper channels and was deemed credible by the intelligence community's inspector general, but acting Director of National Intelligence Joseph Maguire did not pass the complaint along to Congress, as required by law. This was a bad move, Napolitano said, and the "administration is on very, very thin ice, on the grounds on which it blocked it for two reasons." First, the statute says if a complaint is found to be credible and urgent by the inspector general, it shall, not may, be shared with the bipartisan leaders of the House and Senate.
Also, it was a "cockamamie" ruling from the Department of Justice that Maguire is using to defend his decision not to pass the complaint to Congress — they are claiming that the president doesn't work for the intelligence community, therefore the complaint is moot. "Moot?" Napolitano said. "The complaint accuses the president of the United States of bribery, how can that be moot? The Congress has every right under the statute to know about it." Bribery, he continued, is "absolutely an impeachable offense, there's no equivocation. Why do I say that? Because it's stated in the Constitution. The basis for impeachment: treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors."
Rasmussen Lolololol
President Trump on Wednesday will reclassify 4 Conversations , two of Obama's and Two of VP Biden's.
The reason the White House Ggave is to expose the Biden/Obama/Clinton dealings.
The White House also said they have many ready for Release involving Polosi, Schummer , Nadler and others.
OH MY GOD! I saw this and my heart stopped. Trump at 53%?!!! ---and then a certain part of me said, Now that wouldn't just be on the Rasmussen, would it? Would it?
Flashback Quote of the Day
“House Judiciary Committee transcripts of some of President Nixon’s Watergate tape recordings differ extensively, and in many cases significantly, from the edited transcripts made public by the White House.”
— New York Times, June 20, 1974
Member Benefits
__________
IN OTHER WORDS,
The Promised Transcript Is Unlikely to Be Verbatim
Reuters: “Details from a phone call made by Donald Trump that has led the U.S. House of Representatives to launch a formal impeachment inquiry against the president isn’t likely to come from a recording or be verbatim, former White House and national security officials say.
“Instead, because of standard White House protocol for handling phone calls between the president and other world leaders, a transcript is likely to be put together from written notes by U.S. officials who listen in.”
EDITED in other words.
CENSORED in other words.
Something big happened to President Trump this week, and it’s not the Ukraine scandal. His job approval ratings have returned to where they were before his big August slump — and that’s bad news for the Democrats.
Trump clearly had a terrible late summer. Starting with his tweet that the four progressive Democratic House members who call themselves “the Squad” should “go back” to the countries they purportedly were from (only one of the four, Minnesota Rep. Ilhan Omar, is an immigrant), Trump’s job approval ratings declined significantly. From a pre-tweet high of 45.1 percent in the RealClearPolitics average on July 8, Trump’s ratings dropped more than two points before bottoming out at 42.7 percent earlier this month. That’s a terrible rating for a president barely more than a year out from reelection.
But now that Congress has returned and he’s no longer engaged in a battle with Democratic women of color, his ratings are up. They sit at 45.3 percent as of Tuesday afternoon, thanks to a recent Emerson Poll putting Trump’s approval rating at 48 percent, a 2½-year high for Trump
WOW That's higher than when he was elected the first time and higher than Obama at this point in his presidency.
And wait until the FAKE IMPEACHMENT crashes the dems.
RCP Average9/3 - 9/23 45.3 52.1 -6.8
Emerson 9/21 - 9/23 48 47 +1
NBC/WSJ 9/13 - 9/16 45 53 -8
Rasmussen9/19 - 9/23 53 45 +8
FOX News9/15 - 9/17 45 54 -9
Reuters 9/16 - 9/17 43 55. -12
Economist 9/14 - 9/17 44 53 -9
Politico9/13 - 9/16 43 53. -10
The Hill9/11 - 9/12 47 53 -6
Gallup 9/3 - 9/15 46 54. -11
CNN 9/5 - 9/9 42 54. -12
Rasmussen is an outlier, the average is still at 43%, not 55%
After President Trump releases the transcript what more will the Socialist Democrats want?
because you know they will demand more.
speak up .
"Democrats wrote to the Ukrainian government in May 2018 urging it to continue investigations into President Donald Trump’s alleged collusion with Russia in the 2016 presidential campaign — collusion later found not to exist.
The demand, which came from U.S. Senators Robert Menendez (D-NJ), Dick Durbin (D-IL), and Patrick Leahy (D-VT).
what was that you say.
When is the Speaker in Name Only Polosi going to hold a Floor vote and appoint the required Seect Committee?
no wonder her party has rejected her.
"Tuesday on CNN’s “Newsroom,” 2020 presidential hopeful Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D-HI) warned the impeachment of President Donald Trump would further “divide the country.”
Gabbard said, “I think the question of impeachment would further tear apart an already divided country. I think it’s important Donald Trump is defeated. I believe I can defeat him in 2020. But it’s the voters who need to make that choice unequivocally.”
The Socialist Democrats since Nov. 9 tb, 2016 have never, ever accepted defeat.
Can't win in Ideas and Policy.
I am happy they are impeaching Pres. Trump.
Post a Comment