Adam Schiff has lost CNN:— Steve Guest (@SteveGuest) November 13, 2019
CNN’s Toobin: neither witness “had direct contact with the president…that’s a problem” pic.twitter.com/4mpgk6fDhS
Adam Schiff has lost CNN:— Steve Guest (@SteveGuest) November 13, 2019
CNN’s Toobin: neither witness “had direct contact with the president…that’s a problem” pic.twitter.com/4mpgk6fDhS
81 comments:
LOL LOL LOL
One little out of context comment and Ch starts dancing about the loss of CNN.
So if neither of the two witnesses yesterday had direct contact with the President when he said what they heard he said, why is the White House trying to keep those who DID have direct contact with the President and can tell us directly what they heard him say -- from testifying?
Such testimony will surely vindicate the President, so let them testify. Otherwise, someone must have something to hide.
Sondland can testify to direct contact.
So can Bolton.
So can numerous others.
According to Lil Scotty. Toobin is CNN!!!!! BWAAAAAAAAA!!!!!! Your desperation is palpable there sport!!!!!!!
Funny observation Lil Scotty.....the people who have had direct contact have been forbidden to testify by TRUMP!!!! Gee, another obstruction charge???? Why is he hiding these people like Bolton a confirmed conservative who called it a drug deal....WHAT IS HE HIDING???????? Asshole as their testimony will shoot the hearsay BS right up your old white ass!!!!!!
Well Denny...
What are all of these deep state actors hiding when they are attempting to block investigations in Burisma?
btw... Sondland has already testified privately. Why wasn't he up front and center with Kent and Taylor? When you know the public is going to get board quickly, you generally put your best foot forward!
What else Toobin said, WHICH CH "FORGOT":
During CNN's post-testimony coverage, Toobin called [Taylor's yesterday's newly revealed conversation] an "important new development...a bombshell revelation."
Why? Because it reveals someone present hearing the President himself demand extortion.
Sondland will testify personally about why he later contradicted what he earlier said.
We'll see how convincing that is, or not.
Bolton will tell why he was warning everyone away from Trump's personal lawyer Giuliani because he considered him to be "a handgrenade that will blow everybody up."
Bolton now says he was present in a large number of important meetings.
CH, WHY AREN'T YOU JUST LOOKING FORWARD TO ALL THAT?
What are all of these deep state actors hiding when they are attempting
Well now Lil Scotty is claiming Bolton and Mulvaney are deep staters.....NOW THAT IIS MOST AMUSING!!!!!!
You need to ask Sondland why he omitted that call in his testimony....I am sure the committee will be interested in that answer if the fake ambassador revises his testimony a second time.......That can;t be good for trump since Gordo is big supporter!!!!!!!! BWAAAAAAA!!!
James...
With all due respect, the fact that you think these impeachment hearings actually mean anything to me or most any conservative just goes to show exactly how out of touch you really are.
You are attempting to prove something (that even if you can prove) isn't a crime and isn't impeachable. Even if you can get past the problem of all of the actual proof being hearsay, second hand, mind reading... not to mention completely denied by Zelensky and completely contradicted by the facts (the aid was actually provided and no investigation or statements were ever made)...
You still are never, ever, in a million years come even close to getting around the bottom line problem that what is being alleged is nothing more than completely legal business as usual.
And here is the bigger rub James.
I don't "HAVE" to convince you of anything.
What you believe, doesn't matter one bit.
But you HAVE TO CONVINCE me and other conservatives, otherwise this just goes down the crapper as a partisan attack, and ultimately the President will be able to do his VICTORY LAP when he is acquitted (AKA totally vindicated) in the Senate.
bottom line problem that what is being alleged is nothing more than completely legal business as usual.
Business as usual for the Mafia you dumb fucking ingrate......sad how stupid you can be when it comes to trump and his antics....!!!!!!
But you HAVE TO CONVINCE me and other conservatives,
Idiots like you supported nixon until the bitter end!!!!!1 Even then, many assholes supported him even after he resigned....You will be one of those Lil Scotty....to stupid to admit a mistake.....can't fix that sport....so sad!!!! There really is no hope for you and your trump adoration....!!!
"caliphate4vrNovember 14, 2019 at 12:33 PM
fuck off pedophile
You know nothing about honor, you diddle children"
Exactly
Wow, These Three Socialist Stooges of CHT don't act at all like they are willing.
What was the TV Rates for the Shit Show?
Sorry Denny...
This is more like Clinton than Nixon. Only even with Clinton, there was an admitted crime. But people still stuck with him to the bitter end and he remained President.
This is more like Clinton than Nixon.
Sorry ass wipe.....that has nothing to do with what I posted!!!!!! It has to do with your idiotic support of a treasonous trump which will never change, like nixon supporters.....god you are thick today!!!!!
Trump is staying.
Socialist Democrats are shifting from the public failure of yesterday.
CHT is see all Three Socialist Stooges of CHT have thier new white flags waiving proudly.
2015 Hunter Biden vets hired, George Kent request investigation continue, Obama/Biden Shut the mother fucked down.
Again...still waiting for the big guns!
Boooooooom
WASHINGTON (AP) — A second U.S. Embassy staffer in Kyiv overheard a cellphone call between President Donald Trump and his ambassador to the European Union discussing a need for Ukrainian officials to pursue “investigations,” The Associated Press has learned.
Full Coverage: Trump impeachment inquiry
The July 26 call between Trump and Gordon Sondland was first described during testimony Wednesday by William B. Taylor Jr., the acting U.S. ambassador to Ukraine. Taylor said one of his staffers overhead the call while Sondland was in a Kyiv restaurant the day after Trump’s July 25 phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy that triggered the House impeachment inquiry.
The second diplomatic staffer also at the table was Suriya Jayanti, a foreign service officer based in Kyiv. A person briefed on what Jayanti overheard spoke to AP on condition of anonymity to discuss a sensitive matter currently under investigation.
Trump on Wednesday said he did not recall the July 26 call.
“No, not at all, not even a little bit,” Trump said.
The staffer Taylor testified about is David Holmes, the political counselor at the embassy in Kyiv, according to an official familiar with the matter who spoke on condition of anonymity.
Holmes is scheduled to testify Friday before House investigators in a closed session.
Taylor was one of the first witnesses called Wednesday during the impeachment inquiry’s initial open hearing. He testified that his staffer could hear Trump on the phone asking Sondland about “the investigations.”
The accounts of Holmes and Jayanti could tie Trump closer to alleged efforts to hold up military aid to Ukraine in exchange for investigations into political rival Joe Biden and his son Hunter’s business dealings.
Current and former U.S. officials say Sondland’s use of a cellphone in a public place in Ukraine to speak with anyone in the U.S. government back home about sensitive matters, let alone the president, would be a significant breach of communications security.
When will Wikileaks release the 3,000 emails from Crooked Hillary?
AP source: 2nd US official heard Trump call with Sondland
https://apnews.com/6d318542e50b45dc9e1d4d829ad36c96
Trump Fund Raisers Schiff-palsy raises 3.1 Million.
Thank You.
"boooom"
lol@mynameisrogernotalky
Blue (WAVE) - Kentucky Gov. Matt Bevin announced Thursday that he won’t contest the results of the recanvass that took place Thursday, nine days after a nailbiting election night that ended with Democratic challenger ahead by approximately 5,000 votes.
So you are admitting that the President has broken the law and you still stick with him to the bitter end and he remained President?
Hypocrisy squared
https://www.wave3.com/2019/11/14/bevin-concedes-were-going-have-change-governorship/
talian Council Flooded Just as It Rejects Climate Measures
November 14, 2019 at 2:39 pm EST
“Veneto regional council, which is located on Venice’s Grand Canal, was flooded for the first time in its history on Tuesday night — just after it rejected measures to combat climate change,” CNN reports.
“The historic Italian city has been brought to its knees this week by the worst flooding there in more than 50 years.”
Sorry Rog, here's the boom
Leaked documents from the Ukrainian General Prosecutor’s office indicate complex money transfers from foreign sources into the control of a “slush fund” owned and operated by Devon Archer, John Kerry Senior, John Kerry Junior, Heinz Jr, and Hunter Biden.
5:00 PM - 13 Nov 2019
29,585 Retweets43,794 LikesJim T ✝️Montana GalPlease Insult MePJ 💯 U.S.A. 🇺🇸Outlaw Mercy BeDoug NewtonKMoorePorcheezy YakisobaRobert C Flores
1,609 replies29,585 retweets43,794 likes
Reply 1.6K Retweet 30K Like 44K
New conversation
Michael Coudrey
Verified account
@MichaelCoudrey
19h19 hours ago
More
According to the Department of Financial Monitoring (Counter-intelligence) of Latvia, the following sums of money were obtained from Busima Holding Limited (Cyprus) which is open at AS PrivatBank in Latvia:
108 replies4,310 retweets5,806 likes
Reply 108 Retweet 4.3K Like 5.8K
Michael Coudrey
Verified account
@MichaelCoudrey
19h19 hours ago
More
This describes the money transfer of
$14,655,982 and $366,015 EUR from “Wirelogic Technology AS”, and
$1,964,375 from “Digitex Organization LLP”.
Further, part of the sums described above were transferred to Alan Apter, Alexander Kwasniewski, Devon Archer and Hunter Biden.
65 replies4,142 retweets5,846 likes
Reply 65 Retweet 4.1K Like 5.8K
Michael Coudrey
Verified account
@MichaelCoudrey
19h19 hours ago
More
BURISMA HOLDINGS LIMITED, during a period from November 18th 2014 to November 16th 2015 transacted 45 money transfers through MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY LLC in the sum of $3.5M dollars.
The recipient of the money transfer is Rosemont Seneca Bohai LLC.
22 replies2,704 retweets3,885 likes
Reply 22 Retweet 2.7K Like 3.9K
Michael Coudrey
Verified account
@MichaelCoudrey
19h19 hours ago
More
Rosemont Seneca Bohai LLC is owned and operated by Devon Archer, the Kerry Family including John Kerry Senior, John Kerry Junior, Heinz Jr and Hunter Biden.
All of whom are also listed as partners in the Rosemont Seneca Fund and other affiliated Rosemont Seneca companies.
35 replies2,714 retweets3,985 likes
Reply 35 Retweet 2.7K Like 4.0K
Michael Coudrey
Verified account
@MichaelCoudrey
19h19 hours ago
More
Leaked transaction and bank records indicate an influx of large payments from Ukrainian energy company Burisma Holdings Limited to Rosemont Seneca Bohai LLC, in what appears to be monthly payments of $83,333.33.
@MichaelCoudrey
19h19 hours ago
TWITTER BWAAAAAAPAAAAAA!!!!!! The only thing leaking Paula is your fucking brain!!!!!!! You really need help there sport!!!
Roger had mandatory head check he will be back shortly.
You giving out BJ's again, goat fucker.......BWAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!
You are a victim of Stockholm Syndrome!
This summarizes why Lil Scotty and the goat fucker can't think for themselves.....trumps actions are perfect and the Ukes got their money....no crime to see here.....
Representative Jim Jordan of Ohio set their tone and pace, apparently betting that a sustained note of incredulity and a motor-mouth delivery could distract listeners from the fragility of his arguments. He insisted the president couldn’t possibly have done anything wrong because, in the end, Ukraine got its money without committing to any investigations.
DEBATABLE Agree to disagree, or disagree better? Broaden your perspective with sharp arguments on the most pressing issues of the week. Sign up here.
This point of view has radical implications for America’s system of justice and overcrowded prisons, if Mr. Jordan in fact truly believes that all inmates convicted of attempted crimes are innocent of wrongdoing
Yep attempted robbery is not a problem with narrow minded R's !!!
The only boom is in what is left of your mind!
Trump Seen In ‘Animated Conversation’ with William Barr
November 14, 2019 at 4:51 pm EST
Before departing for a campaign rally in Louisiana, President Trump was seen in the Oval Office having what NBC News called an “animated conversation” with Attorney General William Barr.
____________
NEXT TO GO UNDER THE BUS?
Blogger Roger Amick said...
You are a victim of Stockholm Syndrome!
alky,
trump owns your ass way more than he'll ever own ours.
we're just glad he's president.
you, on the other hand - he cost you everything.
mail order stop by the nursing home to pay her respects yet?
James real men, not you sicko, have heated debates and work.
"mail order stop by the nursing home to pay her respects yet?"
His kids haven't.
They want nothing of him.
Boom
In her first press conference since public impeachment hearings began, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi on Thursday scolded reporters who used Republican talking points about the whistleblower — the anonymous intelligence official whose identity President Trump and his allies are insisting must be made public.
“When you talk about the whistleblower, you’re coming into my wheelhouse,” Pelosi said. “The whistleblower is there to speak truth to power and have protection for doing that. And any retribution or harm coming toward a whistleblower undermines our ability to hear truth about power. So I will defend the rights about the whistleblower vehemently.”
The House speaker also accused the president of “bribery” in his actions related to Ukraine.
Speaking to reporters after Wednesday’s hearings, Trump said, “I want to find out who is the whistleblower because the whistleblower gave a lot of very incorrect information, including my call with the president of Ukraine, which was a perfect call and highly appropriate.”
Pelosi said that Trump has every right to present “exculpatory” evidence to the House committees leading the impeachment inquiry.
“If the president has something that is exculpatory — Mr. President, that means you have anything that shows your innocence — then he should make that known,” Pelosi said. “So far we haven’t see that.”
“But nobody — nobody, the president is not above the law, the president will be held accountable — and nobody should have the right to endanger whistleblowers,” the speaker added.
Her comments came a day after two witnesses — Bill Taylor, the top U.S. diplomat in Ukraine, and State Department official George Kent — testified that they believed Trump would not grant Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky an Oval Office meeting or release $400 million in aid until Zelensky announced investigations of former Vice President Joe Biden, his son Hunter Biden, and a debunked conspiracy theory about alleged electoral interference by Ukraine in the 2016 election.
Pelosi said their testimony “corroborated evidence of bribery.”
“The president abused power and violated his oath by threatening to withhold military aid and a White House meeting in exchange for an investigation into his political rival — a clear attempt for the president to give himself an advantage in the 2020 election,” she said.
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi talks to reporters on Capitol Hill on Nov. 14.
“The bribe is to grant or withhold military assistance [in exchange for] a public statement of a fake investigation into the elections,” Pelosi continued. “That’s bribery.”
“What the president has admitted to and says is ‘perfect’ is perfectly wrong,” she added. “It’s bribery.”
Trump and his Republican allies argued that both Taylor and Kent relied on second- and thirdhand information in their testimony. The House speaker warned Americans not to be distracted by that argument, noting that the White House has blocked current and former administration officials who do have firsthand knowledge — including acting chief of staff Mick Mulvaney and former national security adviser John Bolton — from appearing before investigators.
“Don’t fall into the secondhand stuff,” Pelosi said. “That’s a fraudulent proposition put forth by the Republicans. They obstruct everyone who they would regard to have firsthand knowledge.”
Pelosi said she takes no joy in Trump’s possible impeachment, but that it is Congress’s duty to defend the Constitution against “all enemies, foreign and domestic.”
“This is something we do with a heavy heart. This is very prayerful,” she said. “But we must uphold our oath of office.”
Pelosi also compared the impeachment case against Trump to the case against President Richard Nixon, who ultimately resigned before the House could vote on the articles of impeachment.
“What President Trump has done on the record in terms of asking a foreign power to help him in his own election and the obstruction of information about that, the cover-up, makes what Nixon did
Hell Rogerismynamenotalky was left by them to be homeless.
"ALTHOUGH THERE'S NOTHING WRONG WITH MY TAX RETURNS, PLEASE HELP ME HIDE THEM FROM THE AMERICAN PEOPLE," TRUMP ASKS THE SUPREME COURT
Trump Asks Supreme Court to Shield His Tax Returns
November 14, 2019 at 5:14 pm EST
“President Trump asked the Supreme Court on Thursday to stop a prosecutor’s investigation of his personal finances, a bold assertion of presidential power that seeks a landmark decision from the nation’s highest court,” the Washington Post reports.
“The filing by the president’s private lawyers represents a historical moment that tests the court’s independence and highlights the Constitution’s separation-of-powers design. It also marks a new phase in the investigations that have dogged Trump throughout his presidency and have culminated in an impeachment inquiry.
“The justices are not required to review the lower court’s decision. But the chances that the high court will get involved increased Wednesday, when a separate appeals court in a separate case concluded Congress has a right to those same tax records.”
New York Times: “The case, the first concerning Mr. Trump’s personal conduct and business dealings to reach the court, could yield a major ruling on the scope of presidential immunity from criminal investigations."
“What President Trump has done on the record in terms of asking a foreign power to help him in his own election and the obstruction of information about that, the cover-up, makes what Nixon did look almost small,”
The question remains is whether the public interest rate is increasing the President may be facing a historic event.
I'm not predicting anything, my record is not great!
We will see!
presidential immunity from criminal investigation is at risk.
Any President should not be above the law!
Hey kput'z shut the fuck up
Well Roger...
Have you seen any Republicans previous opposed to impeachment suddenly changing their tune after yesterday's hearings? (and no, Chris Wallace is not a Republican and he didn't change his mind).
I have seen some relatively open "cracks" in the Democrats talking points, as I believe that Jordon's cross-examination hit home with some of the points. (Such as the one discussed by Toobin that none of the witnesses provided any first hand accounting of anything)
If there is going to be any sort of increase in support or opposition, I would lean towards opposition... since we have already had all of this information "leaked" prior. Banking on an in-person bump is risky... when you realize that everything that Jordon and the Republicans are asking is going to be "new" and make a bigger impact.
Roger, what time is your window for dinner at the home each night?
Tomorrow will any of the so called witnesses have actual direct evidence and not heard a little something-something?
Well Scott. Speaker Pelosi provided the articles of impeachment today.
“The bribe is to grant or withhold military assistance [in exchange for] a public statement of a fake investigation into the elections,” Pelosi continued. “That’s bribery.”,
And as in the Nixon impeachment his refusal to provide subpoenaed information as in the Nixon tapes, was objection of justice.
The second hand accusations are not the primary allegations. His own transcript will go down in history as the high crime, bribery and extortion.
Even first person evidence is not the primary source of evidence against Trump.
Probably don't believe it most of the newspapers have information that if Presiden Trump wasn't so popular he would be impeached.
The Senate trial could have a secret ballot. There are many Republicans have a conscience and their allegiance to the Constitution matters.
We will see.... quoting the President on Twitter!
Jordan is the Heinrich Himmler of the Trump cult.
"“It’s hearsay,” Rep. Jeff Van Drew (D-NJ) said of Taylor’s testimony. “It’s really difficult dealing with this because it’s he said-she said.”
He. Jordan gets you excited but outside of the base, 40% or so. He's a child abuser, because he didn't report that allegations against the guy who was masturbating in the shower with the young boys.
Kput'z shut the fuck up
The new shift goal post move is "attempted" something or other?
Quigley, a Democrat who represents Illinois and is also an attorney, said during the hearing. "Hearsay can be much better evidence than direct, as we have learned in painful instances and it's certainly valid in this instance."
“It’s hearsay,” Rep. Jeff Van Drew (D-NJ) said of Taylor’s testimony. “It’s really difficult dealing with this because it’s he said-she said.”
oh oh
Real First Hand Witness would be ground breaking stuff in the Schiff Bowl of a sewer.
The real US House vote was Bi-Partisan AGAINST .
Scott, I have been saying that bribery is in the Constitution, and the Congress has an obligation to enforce the Constitution.
The shift toward bribery as an impeachable offense, one of only two crimes specifically cited in the Constitution, comes after nearly two months of debate over whether Trump’s conduct amounted to a “quid pro quo” — a lawyerly Latin term describing an exchange of things of value.
Wednesday’s public testimony from two senior diplomats, Pelosi (D-Calif.) said, “corroborated evidence of bribery uncovered in the inquiry and that the president abused power and violated his oath by threatening to withhold military aid and a White House meeting in exchange for an investigation into his political rival.
Bribery, she suggested, amounted to a translation of quid pro quo that would stand to be more accessible to Americans: “Talking Latin around here: E pluribus unum — from many, one. Quid pro quo — bribery. And that is in the Constitution, attached to the impeachment proceedings.”
I have been saying this same thing for a couple weeks!
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/pelosi-calls-trumps-actions-bribery-as-democrats-sharpen-case-for-impeachment/2019/11/14/0ee9a202-0702-11ea-b17d-8b867891d39d_story.html
Roger in your restricted living situation when your Chef rings the dinner bell you respond like
pavlov's dog.
Roger supports her so of course she is losing.
"Sen. Kamala Harris (D-CA) is floundering in the polls – polls that include Iowa – despite strategically pumping the bulk of her resources into the Hawkeye State."
Budget Official Expected to Break Ranks
November 14, 2019 at 8:14 pm EST
“A longtime career employee at the White House Office of Management and Budget is expected to break ranks and testify Saturday in the House Democrats’ impeachment inquiry, potentially filling in important details on the hold-up of military aid to Ukraine,” the Washington Post reports.
“Mark Sandy would be the first OMB employee to testify in the inquiry, after OMB acting director Russell T. Vought and two other political appointees at the agency defied congressional subpoenas to appear. The White House has called the impeachment inquiry unconstitutional and ordered administration officials not to participate.”
OH MY. THE "GUNS" KEEP GETTING BIGGER.
Giuliani Faces Probe on Campaign Finance
November 14, 2019 at 8:10 pm EST
“Rudy Giuliani is being investigated by federal prosecutors for possible campaign finance violations and a FAILURE TO REGISTER AS A FOREIGN AGENT as part of an active investigation into his financial dealings,” Bloomberg reports.
“The probe of Giuliani, which one official said could also include possible charges on VIOLATING LAWS AGAISNT BRIBING FOREIGN OFFICIALS OR CONSPIRACY, presents a serious threat to Trump’s presidency from a man that former national security adviser John Bolton has called a ‘hand grenade.'”
OH MY. OH MY. OH MY.
If Republicans want to complain that neither of the two witnesses yesterday had direct contact with the President when he said what they heard others say he said, why is the White House trying to keep those who DID have direct contact with the President and can tell us directly what they heard him say -- from testifying?
Such testimony will surely vindicate the President, so let them testify.
Otherwise, someone must have something to hide.
Speaker Nancy Pelosi said the testimony in Wednesday’s public hearing “corroborated evidence of bribery” by President Trump in his dealings with Ukraine. Her use of “bribery” — one of the crimes the Constitution cites as an impeachable offense — suggests that Democrats are moving toward a more specific set of charges that could be codified in articles of impeachment.
The Guns Are Loaded
Mark Sandy would be the first OMB employee to testify in the inquiry, after OMB acting director Russell T. Vought and two other political appointees at the agency defied congressional subpoenas to appear. The White House has called the impeachment inquiry unconstitutional and ordered administration officials not to participate.
Unlike these other OMB officials, Sandy is a career employee, not one appointed by the president. He has worked at the agency off and on for over a decade, under presidents of both parties, climbing the ranks to his current role as deputy associate director for national security programs.
Another never Trump?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/us-policy/2019/11/14/career-white-house-budget-official-expected-break-ranks-testify-impeachment-inquiry/
Mark Sandy, a career White House budget official, is expected to break ranks and testify in the impeachment inquiry. His signature appears on at least one of the so called apportionment letters stopping payment of the Congressionally approved military aid to Ukraine.
WHO TOLD HIM TO DO THAT AND WAS HE TOLD WHY?
White House budget official Mark Sandy signals he will testify in impeachment inquiry
7:51 p.m. ET Nov. 14, 2019
WASHINGTON – A career aide inside the White House budget office signaled Thursday he will testify in the House impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump, the latest case of an administration official bucking orders to ignore congressional subpoenas.
Mark Sandy, a former acting director of the Office of Management and Budget who is currently the agency’s associate director for national security programs, could shed additional light on the reason nearly $400 million in aid to Ukraine was held up this year.
“If Mr. Sandy is subpoenaed, he will appear for a deposition this Saturday,” Sandy’s attorney, Barbara “Biz” Van Gelder, told USA TODAY.
Sandy, who is expected to testify behind-closed doors, is the latest case of a career official defying White House orders to resist congressional subpoenas in the matter, which Trump attorneys describe as an unconstitutional “witch hunt.” He would be the first budget office official to cooperate at a time when there are questions about why the aid was withheld.
White House officials did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
The Democratic-led inquiry is based on a July 25 phone call between Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in which Trump discussed military assistance for Ukraine and suggested Zelensky help with investigations into Joe Biden’s son Hunter and unsubstantiated allegations about Ukraine’s involvement in the 2016 presidential election.
Other officials have testified that they became aware in July that a hold had been placed on the Ukraine aid when an unnamed OMB staffer disclosed the decision during an inter-agency phone call but could not say why.
The Three Socialist Stooges of CHT go get some Rest knowing President Trump is your President .
Donald Trump’s personal lawyer, has said he is confident the president will remain loyal to him as an impeachment inquiry unfolds in which the former New York mayor has become a central figure.
But Giuliani joked that he had good “insurance” in case Trump did turn on him, amid speculation Republicans will seek to frame him as a rogue actor.
In a telephone interview with the Guardian, in response to a question about whether he was nervous that Trump might “throw him under a bus” in the impeachment crisis, Giuliani said, with a slight laugh: “I’m not, but I do have very, very good insurance, so if he does, all my hospital bills will be paid.”
Whether it was a joke or a veiled threat, Giuliani has emerged as a key player in the impeachment proceedings, which center on the question of whether Trump sought to pressure the Ukrainian government to investigate his political rival, Joe Biden.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/nov/14/rudy-giuliani-donald-trump-insurance-loyal
shut up alky.
you never "say" anything here. you steal what others "say" and call it your own.
Her use of “bribery” — one of the crimes the Constitution cites as an impeachable offense — suggests that Democrats are moving toward a more specific set of charges that could be codified in articles of impeachment.
no, what it means is that the democrats felt the need to poll certain terms like "bribery" and "quid pro quo" to agree on a word that their fucktard base of low info voters could comprehend.
Several Democrats have stopped using the term “quid pro quo,” instead describing “bribery” as a more direct summation of Trump’s alleged conduct.
The shift came after the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee conducted focus groups in key House battlegrounds in recent weeks, testing messages related to impeachment. Among the questions put to participants was whether “quid pro quo,” “extortion” or “bribery” was a more compelling description of Trump’s conduct. According to two people familiar with the results, which circulated among Democrats this week, the focus groups found “bribery” to be most damning. The people spoke on the condition of anonymity because the results have not been made public.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/pelosi-calls-trumps-actions-bribery-as-democrats-sharpen-case-for-impeachment/2019/11/14/0ee9a202-0702-11ea-b17d-8b867891d39d_story.html
pelosi: "impeachment is not political. now please excuse me as i await the results of our political polling of the word "bribery."
"President Donald Trump’s nominee to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, Steven Menashi, was confirmed by the Senate Thursday."
Big Win.
Receiving American Tax dollars is now a bribe.
He'll, that is what 60 years of Socialism in the US is founded on.
Look at the 26 Dwarfs, free, free, free
campaign.
Blogger KansasDemocrat said...
"President Donald Trump’s nominee to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, Steven Menashi, was confirmed by the Senate Thursday."
Big Win.
big win indeed.
this is one reason why i am loving this impeachment circle-jerk.
while the democrats are giving the left some impeachment porn to masturbate over, mitch is quietly and methodically re-shaping the federal judiciary. a move that will have ramifications for at least a generation.
and what the democrats have not bothered to calculate either -
when this clown show reaches the senate, mitch gets to set the schedule. that means six days per week, calling countless witnesses, dragging this on for days and weeks, and effectively suspending the presidential campaigns of every democrat senator currently seeking the nomination. probably through february and up to the iowa caucuses.
so... bernie, harris, booker and warren get to actually do their fucking jobs, while seeing their road trips suspended and their donations drying up due to their inability to campaign and in turn, fundraise.
heh.
i love it.
democrats never think this shit through, and this time they may have royally fucked themselves in the most epic manner we'll see in our lifetime.
there's your "BOOM" alky.
IF, any of them decide to be a no show in the US Senate for every single minute, thier base will ever forgive them.
This is more fun then I ever imagined it would be.
Roger in your restricted living situation when your Chef rings the breakfast bell you respond like
pavlov's dog.
so sad your kids didn't help you in your epic meltdown on the public stage.
those 3 K fakebook friends, sat on thier hands.
...Ukrainian Prosecutor General Yuriy Lutsenko and Deputy Head of the Prosecutor General's International Legal Cooperation Department Kostiantyn Kulyk must feel like invisible men.
They believe they have solid evidence that ties American Democrats and officials in the Ukrainian government to 2016 election interference and the obstruction of criminal probes, yet no one will pay attention to them...
... [The Hill's John] Solomon says that Lutsenko and Kulyk have been trying for a year to present their evidence to officials at the Sessions/Rosenstein led DOJ, however, not a single official they've contacted has shone any interest in pursuing the claims.
The men then decided to travel to the U.S. to speak with new Attorney General William Barr directly about their findings.
However, their attempts to obtain visas have been thwarted repeatedly by U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Marie Yovanovitch, a highly partisan Democrat. Kulyk told Solomon, "We were supposed to share this information during a working trip to the United States. However, the [U.S.] ambassador blocked us from obtaining a visa. She didn't explicitly deny our visa, but also didn't give it to us..."
https://www.redstate.com/elizabeth-vaughn/2019/04/09/biggest-story-collusion-sessionsrosenstein-doj-repeatedly-refused-acknowledge-hopefully-william-barr-will-listen-act/
thier base will ever forgive them.
BWAAAAAAAAAA!!!! You dumb goat fucking asshole......!!!!!!! Go inhale deeply......LOLOLOLOLOL
They believe they have solid evidence
And rat the fucking loser still believes in the Easter Bunny!!!!!!! Asshole....!!!!!
Dennis, why so out of control angry?
Today's Nazi's are conducting day two of thier show trial.
And it is "bbbbbooooooooommmmmmmbbbbbiiiiinnnnnggggg"
Post a Comment