But there are still people in the United States dumb enough to still argue that the impeachment of Bill Clinton was about a blow job!
I used to think that these people were just trolls tossing around rhetoric. But apparently, this is what they actually believe.
5 comments:
@thebradfordfile
Adam Schiff isn’t just pissing on the constitution this week, he’s trying to keep a witness from speaking who may actually incriminate the chair of the intelligence committee.
Schiff is in deep schiff.
and the Senate needs to make sure this is cleaned up.
IT WILL BE CLEANED UP. ONE WAY OR ANOTHER.
Yes James...
The Senate will subpoena Eric Ciaramella in order to find out how much pre-impeachment collusion was taking place between him, other deep state players, and the Democrats in Congress! The Senate will also subpoena Schiff for the same reason.
I suspect that both will ignore the subpoenas, even as Schiff himself went to court to attempt to have their his subpoenas answered. It will be interesting to see his reasoning for ignoring such a subpoena as he will not have the same argument, because the Senate WILL follow all known rules and laws of impeachment.
Ch,
I guess you can't get it through your thick skull that the original whistleblower could turn out to be a Trump-hating Satan himself and it wouldn't make any real difference because he ONLY reported being upset by what he heard OTHERS WHO WERE ALSO UPSET saying about the call.
It is the MULTIPLE CORROBORATIONS of that that make Trump's situation untenable, plus Trump's activities with Giuliani and others both before and after the call.
It's those CORROBORATIONS, NOT the original report of the call nor the redacted transcript* that make Trump's position precarious.
____________
*And we STILL don't have the promised original UNREDACTED transcript of the call.
Actually James...
None of these people being "upset" has anything to do with anything. Their job is to do the bidding of the SOS who is doing the bidding of the President.
And what you cannot get through your thick skull is that what the President did WAS NOT ILLEGAL. It was little more than an unpopular position from people who believe he was being "inappropriate" because he might actually uncover something that actually IS corruption in Ukraine (and it just might involve people like the whistleblower).
Moreover, you forget that people who listen to these calls are under legal obligation to keep these conversations secret (even if they do not involve classified information). The President's diplomatic conversations with other world leaders are not to be "leaked" to the press or to the opposition Party in Congress. That is why the National Security Agency decided that these conversations had to be taken off line and secured in a more private place.
Leaking this information IS ACTUALLY AGAINST THE LAW! Yet it has happened multiple times.
So at the end of the day, the people actually breaking the law are probably the deep state players who are orchestrating this whole thing, while the President of the United States was acting entirely within his legal authority.
The fact that State Employees don't agree or don't like it... doesn't make their actions any less "illegal" or make the President's any less "legal".
So yeah, James... the Whistle Blower is not entitled to protection because he is not a real whistle blower according to the office of legal counsel, and if he provided classified or sensitive information to Schiff prior to making a complaint.. then those actions are likely illegal (from both sides).
So yeah, James... both sides of this (Ciaramella and Schiff) need to be questioned. Ciaramella must reveal the source of his criminal leaks.
Post a Comment