 |
| Hypocrisy is the bedrock of liberalism! |
Sort of how quid pro quo was fine when he did it, but he believes Trump should be impeached because he might have done it.
Saturday, December 28, 2019
So Joe Biden would ignore a congressional subpoena...
but he supports the impeachment of Donald Trump over people in his administration ignoring congressional subpoenas?
Sort of how quid pro quo was fine when he did it, but he believes Trump should be impeached because he might have done it.
Sort of how quid pro quo was fine when he did it, but he believes Trump should be impeached because he might have done it.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
51 comments:
Biden Would Not Comply with Senate Subpoena
December 27, 2019 at 10:56 pm EST
Joe Biden told the Des Moines Register that he would not comply with a subpoena to testify at President Trump’s impeachment trial in the Senate.
Biden argued that complying with a subpoena and testifying would essentially allow Trump to shift attention away from the president’s own actions.
Said Biden: “The reason I wouldn’t is because it’s all designed to deal with Trump doing what he’s done his whole life: trying to take the focus off him. The issue is not what I did.”
He added: “This is all about a diversion. And we play his game all the time. He’s done it his whole career.”
ERROR
BIDEN SAYS
Impeachment Supercharges Battle for Senate
December 28, 2019 at 1:45 pm EST
Politico:
“The battle for the Senate majority in 2020 was always going to be heated. And now here comes impeachment. The Senate’s impeachment trial of President Donald Trump is still stuck in limbo, but the looming verdict represents the most consequential vote senators will take before next year’s elections — and a weighty position for challengers seeking to join the chamber.
“Impeachment also threatens to yoke the 35 separate races for Senate seats even closer to the presidential contest. The politics around impeachment have calcified for both parties, with public opinion rigidly consistent and senators and candidates mostly falling along party lines ahead of a prospective vote to acquit Trump or remove him from office.
“Democrats — who need to net three seats in next year’s elections to win back control of the chamber if they also win the presidency — have attempted to squeeze vulnerable GOP senators, calling for a fair trial to include administration witnesses who refused to testify before the House and criticizing Majority Leader Mitch McConnell for saying he did not consider himself an impartial juror.”
Trump Tells California and New York to Ask Him for Help
December 28, 2019 at 2:00 pm EST
President Trump slammed New York and California over homelessness, saying the states’ governors should call him if they “can’t handle” the issue.
Said Trump: “California and New York must do something about their tremendous homeless problems. They are setting records!”
He added: “If their Governors can’t handle the situation, which they should be able to do very easily, they must call and ‘politely’ ask for help. Would be so easy with competence!”
THEY OUGHT TO CALL HIS BLUFF ON THIS.
"WHY YES, MR. PRESIDENT, YOU TELL US EXACTLY WHAT TO DO AND WE'LL HOLD YOU RESPONSIBLE FOR THE RESULTS. YOU SAY IT'S SO EASY TO DO, SO YOU JUST TELL US YOUR BRILLIANT, COMPETENT, "SO EASY" SOLUTION FOR SOLVING HOMELESSNESS IN OUR TWO STATES."
Ship them to Mexico.
Ship them to Canada.
Trump is under investigation, not Biden.
He should file to squash the subpoena.
Cognitive dissonance is the Coldheartedtruth since Trump was elected to by a minority popular vote margin of record numbers!
Trump is under investigation, not Biden.
Well Rog... Are Mulvaney, Bolton, Blair, and Duffy under investigation? Because the Democrats want to call a bunch of witnesses that are not "under investigation" to testify.
They claim you have to come and testify (you cannot even challenge it in court) if you are subpoenaed... and it certainly doesn't matter if they are not under investigation... just whether Democrats want to talk to them.
But let's do this.
Let's have Barr call for a Special Counsel to investigate the whole thing. Burisma, Hunter Biden, Shokin, Joe Biden, and find out if Trump had legitimate reason to look into it?
What say you?
You seem to think it's perfectly acceptable for the GOP Presidential Candidate to be under constant investigation...
but poor old Joe cannot handle anything like that, huh?
He should file to squash the subpoena.
Well isn't that an impeachable offense!
Just ask any of the Congressional Democrat who voted that it was "Obstruction of Congress" who claim you have to submit to the will of Congress?
Or is that just for Democratic subpoenas, not Republican ones?
This is blows up the House Crybabies.
"Biden is not under investigation "
Alky making up shit like owning a $1 million fall of home . 🤣
Let’s Geaux Tigers and Clemzin Tigers
All Tigers final
First. Biden is not under investigation.
Second. This President is not above the law.
Third "squash " is a legal term.
If the court order to appear, he would have to go, or be indicted.
Do you believe that Democratic subpoenas should be enforced, but never for the Republican witnesses are not required by law to appear as directed by the President?
Kput'z shut the fuck up.
Trump has been impeached.
Well Rog... Are Mulvaney, Bolton, Blair, and Duffy under investigation? Because the Democrats want to call a bunch of witnesses that are not "under investigation" to testify.
They were witnesses in the President's administration, therefore they should appear or maybe face indictments.
"Trump has been impeached."
So fucking what?
Do that bring the love of your life back ?
Does it get you that million dollar home, the new car told your dreams and a huge bank account as you said will all come your way in 2020 on your Facebook page?
What is your plan to gain such wealth?
EMS , Fire and Police are all responding to a emergency call at the Residence of Joe Biden. Developing Story, Flash News Release.
Seems there was a major cave in.
Kansas Dim keeps doing personal attacks because he is too small minded to do better.
LSU is kicking ass
Georgia would have given them a better game.
This is embarrassing
A federal judge on Friday rejected an attempt to restore 98,000 people to Georgia's voter rolls following a recent purge of more than 300,000 voters.
Judge Steve Jones determined that the plaintiffs did not show that the cancellations violated the U.S. constitution, according to The Atlanta Journal-Constitution.
The 309,000 purged voters' registrations were canceled because they had moved away or had not participated in elections, although 22,000 of them were reinstated because they contacted election officials during a certain time period.
The Journal-Constitution reported that the 98,000 people affected by Friday's decision had not participated in elections since 2012, but either voted or made contact with election officials during the two years prior to that.
The office of Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger praised Jones's decision in a Friday statement.
"Today Judge Jones upheld Georgia's decision to continue to maintain clean voter rolls," the statement said. "Despite activists' efforts and lawsuits that only waste taxpayer dollars, Georgia is continuing to ensure every eligible voter can vote and voter lists remain accurate."
The suit was brought by voting rights group Fair Fight Action, which is tied to former Georgia gubernatorial candidate Stacey Abrams (D).
Joe Biden says he would "honor" whatever Congress "legitimately" asks of him in impeachment trial"
What a gutless coward
CS is again right .
LSU is crushing OK.
Double team LSU #2.Damn.
They were witnesses in the President's administration, therefore they should appear or maybe face indictments.
But you just stated that it's legal to "squash" a subpoena.
Now you say you must testify or face indictment?
Sorry Rog... you're losing it.
Jane, before you run off two things you have to know and can share with us.
1,
"income inequality"
Define in your own words what that means to you and how you are directly impacted.
2, What is your solution , again in your own words.
Thank you.
I asked this and you ghosted.
Take a shot at it.
Ch says,
PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE don't allow the very people to testify under oath who really know firsthand what the President said and did.
That would be SO unfair!
pointing out your logic and reasoning errors , again.
"JamesDecember 28, 2019 at 4:33 PM
"Kansas Dim keeps doing personal attacks" Ineffective Jane
Georgia would have given them a better game.
Georgia had already lost by 4 touchdowns. You don't get a second chance.
Oklahoma might have been better if they hadn't had three of their best player suspended after drug testing. Had they been at full strength it might be closer.
The difference is the QB play. One if NFL ready, one is just a classic college running QB.
PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE don't allow the very people to testify under oath who really know firsthand what the President said and did.
What difference would it make...
Even what Democrats "accuse" him of isn't close to illegal or impeachable. The fact that they cannot prove it is irrelevant to that.
Next time they decide to impeach. Maybe they do it for an actual crime. Then "witnesses" would be relevant.
And lets be clear here James...
We both know if these witnesses "really" would have made a difference, then the House would have at least "attempted" to compel them to testify with an order from a Judge.
The Dems simply didn't want to get into long drawn out court battles. The battle will now be in the Senate, and Repugs may come off looking bad.
REPUGS and WHITE HOUSE: You didn't have first hand witnesses!
DEMS: Then let the first hand witnesses testify now!
REPUGS and WHITE HOUSE: No, we won't!
https://www.newsweek.com/trump-names-ukraine-whistlelbower-deletes-retweet-claims-broke-federal-protection-laws-retaliation-1479472
Jane has not the intellect to answer questions about topics he brings to this blog.
Kansas Dim, I never even saw, much less "run off from" your post on another thread where you asked me to define income inequality.
Here's a partial definition even you should be able to understand:
Warren Buffet has said that it simply makes no sense and is completely unfair that his secretary has to pay a higher percentage of her income in taxes than he with all his millions pays.
Republicans crushing democrats over impeachment worse than LSU crushing Oklahoma
Trump’s War on Science and Common Sense
December 28, 2019
“In just three years, the Trump administration has
diminished the role of science in federal policymaking
while halting or disrupting research projects nationwide,
marking a transformation of the federal government whose effects, experts say,
could reverberate for years,” the Washington Post reports.
“Political appointees have
shut down government studies,
reduced the influence of scientists over regulatory decisions and
in some cases pressured researchers not to speak publicly.
The administration has particularly
challenged scientific findings related to the environment and public health
opposed by industries such as oil drilling and coal mining.
It has also impeded research around human-caused climate change, which President Trump has dismissed despite a global scientific consensus.”
FUTURE GENERATIONS WILL CURSE THIS PRESIDENT.
Jane you idiot.
I said in your own words.
You can't form your own thoughts.
So sad.
😂@Jane
my Qustion on Her tooic.
Jane, before you run off two things you have to know and can share with us.
1,
"income inequality"
Define in your own words what that means to you and how you are directly impacted.
2, What is your solution , again in your own words.
Take a shot at it.
Your answer and solution was Warren Buffet Tax Rate Babble.
Best you stay with cut n paste.
To squash the subpoena is a legal term. If the Court agrees with the request to squash the subpoena, he does not have to appear during the trial in the Senate trial to testify or face indictment.
Scott, you have lost it.
Since Biden was not being ordered to refuse the subpoena by the President, sorry Scott you are losing it.
Funny how she is unwilling to put her own money on the Table.
"Elizabeth Warren's campaign sounds the alarm as fundraising pace slows about 30% in fourth quarter" 😂
President Trump is raising unpresidented cash donations .
Even what Democrats "accuse" him of isn't close to illegal or impeachable.
He's already been impeached.
The Republican Senate will probably not convict him, but it was impeachable because he was impeached.
The third President in history!
Only 4 Republicans would have to support a trial with testimony by the three stooges.
Scott A**hole, has lost his mind!
Actually was he really impeach or was it just a resolution?
In other words, is an impeachment not delivered to the senate really an impeachment?
I tend to agree with the Democrats' own expert and says it is not.
So does McConnell (for now). As long a he thinks it's politically advantageous to keep impeachment in limbo, he'll go on remaking the federal courts.
Once again Ohio State got all the hype and once again they come up short.
Jane again ran off with his tail tucked under his skirt.
Uneducated best fits the Three Socialist Stooges of CHT .
Roger, do tell us of your plan as you stated on your Facebook for 2020.
Where you live in a million dollar home,drive the car of your dreams and have a huge bank account.
Roger, why don't you have those things?
And, why don't you have a Happy wife at your side?
You used to tell us you did, but, not anymore.
He's already been impeached.
The Republican Senate will probably not convict him, but it was impeachable because he was impeached.
Interesting logic. By the same exact logic:
Trump will be totally exonerated of all wrong doing when he is acquitted or the charges are dismissed in the Senate.
It will be forever determined that he has done absolutely nothing wrong because that is how the Senate will vote.
So that it how it works, if you want to use pure definitions and demand that our Congress is infallible.
CHT, Roger will have to shape shift to avoid his statements .
Kansas Dim thinks it is fine that billionaire Warren Buffet's secretary has to pay a higher percentage of her income in taxes than he with all his millions pays.
That's what's wrong with the GOP. They help the wealthy at the expense of the poor and the middle class.
They are enriching the wealthy and fleecing the middle class.
dismissed in the Senate.
It will be forever determined that he has done absolutely nothing wrong because that is how the Senate will vote.
Just like O.J. Simpson was found not guilty.
Scott A**hole has lost his mind.
Post a Comment