Thursday, December 26, 2019

Time for the annual winners and losers of the year!

Some of these people are obvious (eg: Beto O'Rourke losing, Boris Johnson winning). Others may be more of a subjective matter of opinion thing. I always like to make this a group effort, so let's have some suggestions!


Let's also try to keep this in the public figure sandbox here, no need to dump on people we know. It doesn't have to be politics, and it can certainly be international.

70 comments:

Commonsense said...

Winners:

Donald Trump
Mitch McConnell
Fox News
Mike Pence
Christmas

Losers

Nancy Pelosi
Adam Schiff
Former FBI leaders
The liberal media.
Festivals.

anonymous said...

The goat fucker and his followers win !!!!


Loser Trumps's old white man party as it bleeds women and minorities by the bucket full!!!!

Honest, decent, truthful Rev. said...

LOSERS
THE AMERICAN PEOPLE AND THEIR FOREIGN POLICY,
WHICH TRUMP HAS TURNED INTO A SHAMBLES

SEE THE FOLLOWING:


The Aftermath of the Ukraine Scandal
December 26, 2019 at 9:47 am EST

Washington Post:
“The new Russia adviser at the White House — the third in just six months — has no meaningful background on the subject. The only expert on Ukraine has never spoken with President Trump, only been mocked by him publicly.

“The U.S. Embassy in Kyiv will soon be without its highest-ranking diplomat for the second time in a year, as another ambassador departs after being undermined by the U.S. president and his personal attorney.

“The CIA analyst who triggered the impeachment inquiry continues to work on issues relating to Russia and Ukraine, but when threats against him spike — often seemingly spurred by presidential tweets — he is driven to and from work by armed security officers.”

THIS PRESIDENT IS AN ENEMY OF THE PEOPLE

Commonsense said...

It's not surprising the three stooges make no meaningful contribution to the thread.

Honest, decent, truthful Rev. said...

LOSERS
OUR MILITARY AND INTELLIGENCE ADVISERS WHO ARE NOT BELIEVED WHILE PUTIN IS.
THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ARE IN PERIL!
OUR DEMOCRATIC SYSTEM IS THREATENED BY PUTIN-SYCOPHANT TRUMP


How U.S. Will Counter Russia Election Interference

December 26, 2019 at 9:43 am EST

Washington Post:
“Military cyber officials are developing information warfare tactics that could be deployed against senior Russian officials and oligarchs if Moscow tries to interfere in the 2020 U.S. elections through hacking election systems or sowing widespread discord.*

“One option being explored by U.S. Cyber Command would target senior leadership and Russian elites, though probably not President Vladimir Putin,** which would be considered too provocative, said the current and former officials who spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the issue’s sensitivity. The idea would be to show that the target’s sensitive personal data could be hit if the interference did not stop, though officials declined to be more specific.”

*OH NO! THE RUSSIANS NEVER DID SUCH A THING!
TRUMP ASKED PUTIN AND PUTIN SAID THEY DIDN'T!!!
AND OF COURSE THAT'S TRUE, OR TRUMP WOULD NOT HAVE SAID HE BELIEVED HIM!
THIS MUST BE DEMOCRAT HATE-TRUMP PROPAGANDA!

**PUT A STOP TO THIS, MR. PRESIDENT. YOUR CLOSE FRIENDSHIP WITH BELOVED STATESMAN PUTIN COULD BE AT STAKE.

Anonymous said...




“The CIA analyst who triggered the impeachment inquiry continues to work on issues relating to Russia and Ukraine, but when threats against him spike — often seemingly spurred by presidential tweets — he is driven to and from work by armed security officers.”

i'm always amused by this particular line of bullshit, the use of which seems to be on the rise.

critics of trump are always, usually within mere minutes of the airing of the criticism, subject to an avalanche of DEATH THREATS, which require armed guards to accompany them everywhere.

meanwhile, these never ending barrages of DEATH THREATS never, ever seem to materialize against anyone on the left.

it's almost like the left seeks to compensate for the lack of actual threats. threats like bernie bro and rachel maddow superfan james hodgkinson, who opened fire on a field of republicans, almost killing steve scalise.

go peddle your fables to your "ministry" pederast.


THIS PRESIDENT IS AN ENEMY OF THE PEOPLE

no, this president is an enemy of THE LEFT. which is why his favorables are on the rise, his campaign coffers are stuffed with tens of million$ of new donations, and nitwits like you are reduced to stoke the fears of the chronically stupid with myths about death threats.


anonymous said...

For the science deniers....there is a 99% chance that 2019 will be a top 3 year ......which includes hottest evah.....yep, GW is a hoax that is perpetrated by scientists who need funding.....BWAAAAAAAA!!!!!!

anonymous said...

stooges make no meaningful contribution to the thread.

So opines the GED and his list of great R's and reprehensible D's......you really are amusing cramps.....

Honest, decent, truthful Rev. said...

WHERE DOES DEVIOUS DONALD GET HIS INSPIRATION?
SEE THE FOLLOWING

Russian Police Raid Opposition Leader‘s Office
December 26, 2019 at 7:40 am EST

“Police dragged away Russian opposition leader Alexey Navalny on Thursday during a raid on the Moscow offices of his Anti-Corruption Foundation in a continuing crackdown on critics of President Vladimir Putin, later releasing him,” Bloomberg reports.


“The police action, involving masked officers in helmets, appeared to be aimed at preventing Navalny’s organization from airing a regular evening program Thursday that got 1.4 million views the previous week.”

CAREFUL! AS SOON AS ENEMY OF THE PEOPLE TRUMP CAN GET MORE CONTROL OVER OUR FBI AND CIA AND OTHER INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES, HE WILL BE FOLLOWING THE EXAMPLE OF HIS HERO VLADIMIR.

DEMOCRACY DIES IN THE DARKNESS OF DEVIOUS DONALD!

Anonymous said...



Trump stock market rally is far outpacing past US presidents

The S&P 500 has returned more than 50% since President Trump was elected, more than double the average market return of presidents three years into their term, according to Bespoke Investment Group.

Historically, years three and four garner the highest market returns for U.S. presidents.

The S&P will have to gain about 6% in 2020 to beat the average presidential return.


https://www.cnbc.com/2019/12/26/trumps-stock-market-rally-is-far-outpacing-past-us-presidents.html



yeah, some enemy of the people. who also does a lousy hitler impersonation.

Devious Donald said...

a lousy hitler impersonation

DEVIOUS DONALD:
I RESENT THAT! I'M VERY GOOD AT IT.I DIDN'T KEEP 'MEIN KAMP' BESIDE MY BED FOR YEARS FOR NOTHING!

Devious Donald said...

KAMPF

anonymous said...

Biggest loser of the year....

The environment!!!!!! But, who cares other than people with brains....



Trump stock market rally is far outpacing past US presidents


BWAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!

Honest inquirer said...

How many of you Repugs got some of Devious Donald's clean coal in your stocking for Christmas?

anonymous said...

https://www.cnn.com/interactive/2019/business/stock-market-by-president/index.html


Yep....maybe rat should read this.....BWAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!

C.H. Truth said...

Well James...

For all your bluster about Russia and their interference...

Is the obvious lost on you? That it all occurred under Obama's leadership? Rather than do anything tangible about it, they spent all their time trying to prove that Donald Trump was a Russian spy?

That under Obama's leadership, they got duped by Russian propaganda that their own Party BOUGHT AND PAID FOR and that they chased their tails around in a circle, all the While Vladimir Putin was laughing his ass off at Obama/Biden/Comey/Brennan/Clapper... as a bunch of useful idiots for his cause?

Honest, decent, truthful Rev. said...

Trump Lashes Out at Pelosi in Christmas Tweets
December 26, 2019 at 7:43 am EST

President Trump on Wednesday lashed out at Speaker Nancy Pelosi in a pair of tweets Christmas night, decrying what he called a “Scam Impeachment,” The Hill reports.

Said Trump: “Why should Crazy Nancy Pelosi, just because she has a slight majority in the House, be allowed to Impeach the President of the United States?”
____________

BECAUSE of your criminally unconstitutional acts, Devious Donald.

He also called the impeachment process “very unfair.”
Awww. Weep weep weep.

C.H. Truth said...

Until something that ridiculous happens under Trump, I think we can all by default agree that whatever Trump does in Russia is a VAST improvement over the morons (Who used to be in charge) who fell for the Putin misdirect in 2016.

Quite possibly the single most humiliation of one Government over another.

Thanks Obama for appointing complete morons!!!

Honest, decent, truthful Rev. said...

Well Ch. Do you want to bet that Putin didn't get some of his very biggest laughs from Deviously Dumb Donald Trump?

C.H. Truth said...

He didn't fool Trump.

He fooled the Obama/Biden administration.

They just tried to blame their own massive election failure on their patented ridiculous fools errand that Trump himself was somehow to blame for the Russian interference.

Question. Do you think they were "REALLY" dumb enough to believe that Trump was a Russian spy who got elected President? Or do you think they were smart enough to realize that people like you are DUMB ENOUGH to actually believe what they tell you?


Last time I checked, I don't think he has pulled anything like that over on our current Administration.

anonymous said...

whatever Trump does in Russia is a VAST improvement over the morons (Who used to be in charge) who fell for the Putin misdirect in 2016.



BWAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!! Yeah lil Scotty.....sucking putins cock is an amazing improvement in stupidity which you buy into!!!!!! Again you chose party over country....sad......white power is your other passion which your side advocates....!!!!!!!!

Honest, decent, truthful Rev. said...

I never heard anyone say that Trump was a Russian spy who got elected President. I only heard that over the years he benefited tremendously from business interests in the corrupt Russian system which he would very much like to continue to benefit from.

Guess that's why he's been so kissy kissy with Vladimir?

Honest, decent, truthful Rev. said...

...if we could only see his tax returns...

Honest, decent, truthful Rev. said...

The biggest question of all:
WHAT IS HE STILL HIDING?

(and on MANY levels)

caliphate4vr said...

Fear it, Fatty

LMAO

Anonymous said...



Last time I checked, I don't think he has pulled anything like that over on our current Administration.

not only that, but US sanctions on russia have never been tougher.


you know, the left really could use a better imagination when coming up with nonsensical conspiracies with which to attack trump. and less reliance on psychological projection.

there WAS an instance where an American politician actually DID collude with russia to defeat an American president.

it was ted kennedy back in the 80's in an effort to prevent the reelection of Ronald Reagan.

Anonymous said...

“A court ruling last week putting the Affordable Care Act further in jeopardy may provide the opening Democrats have been waiting for to regain the upper hand on health care against Republicans in 2020,” Politico reports.

Anonymous said...

10:03
IOW, potential winners.

anonymous said...


Anonymous caliphate4vr said...
Fear it, Fatty


You keep proving your worthlessness........dumb fucking loser you win asshole of the year!!!! BWAAAAAAAAAA!!!!

Anonymous said...

James said...

...if we could only see his tax returns...



let's see yours, pederast.

we would be very interested to see the hush money trail that you paid the families of your child rape victims.


C.H. Truth said...

I never heard anyone say that Trump was a Russian spy who got elected President.

Then what was the entire Mueller investigation then... if not an attempt to prove that Trump and his campaign was conspiring with a foreign power (which would basically make them clandestine foreign agents)?

Are you willing to finally admit that you were never dumb enough to believe that our President and the Russian President were working together to steal an election from Hillary Clinton?

Anonymous said...


it was always bullshit -



THE RUSSIAN HACK: It sounds like a Hillary conspiracy theory, and it is.

R. Emmett Tyrrell Jr:

How did we find ourselves at this comic pass with the Democratic Party warning us of the Russian menace — the Democratic Party whose members have included Alger Hiss and, more lately, Bill Ayers? Well, turn to the recently released bestseller written by Jonathan Allen and Amie Parnes, “Shattered: Inside Hillary Clinton’s Doomed Campaign.” All the pundits are talking about it, and there are things to admire in it. For instance, turn to Page 395. There you will find this revelation: “Hillary declined to take responsibility for her own loss . Hillary kept pointing her finger at Comey and Russia . That strategy had been set within twenty-four hours of her concession speech . For a couple of hours [Hillary and her aides] went over the script they would pitch to the press and the public. Already, Russian hacking was the centerpiece of the argument.” Now it is the “centerpiece” of the mainstream media and the Democratic Party’s campaign against Donald Trump.

Read the whole thing.

I’d just add that if Democrats had constantly shown this much concern about the Russians, we’d have won the Cold War ten years sooner.


https://pjmedia.com/instapundit/265107/

Anonymous said...



new democrat campaign ad:

https://youtu.be/gjzeNBSZFUo

Honest, decent, truthful Rev. said...

Tell us in a few simple words, Ch, why when Trump asked Vladimir if there was a concerted Russian cyberspace attempt to interfere in the American presidential election, Trump said, "He denied it and I believe him..." ---thus siding with Putin against the unanimous conviction of our intelligence services that the Russians HAD TRIED, or even WERE SUCCESSFUL IN, stealing the election?

Tell us in a few simple words why Trump said that?

Anonymous said...

unanimous conviction of our intelligence services


who were, to a person, epically, spectacularly, egregiously, galactically, and INTENTIONALLY WRONG.

when this is the basis for your bullshit question pederast, i wouldn't be expecting an answer anytime soon.

Honest, decent, truthful Rev. said...

Yep, Ratty.
Here's how wrong they were:
Look at my 9:17 AM post.

Honest, decent, truthful Rev. said...

...if we could only see his tax returns...
RAT: let's see yours, pederast.
we would be very interested to see the hush money trail that you paid the families of your child rape victims.

LOL Well, Rattypoo, you have my identity. Report your suspicions to the IRS. It is your American duty.

Of course, that would subject you to libel and slander charges.

Anonymous said...

Look at my 9:17 AM post.


ok


...said the current and former officials who spoke on the condition of anonymity...


huh.

so we have another round of "let's make shit up and attribute anonymous sources."

fucking evergreen.

LOL.

good job, pederast.


C.H. Truth said...

Tell us in a few simple words, Ch, why when Trump asked Vladimir if there was a concerted Russian cyberspace attempt to interfere in the American presidential election, Trump said, "He denied it and I believe him..." ---thus siding with Putin against the unanimous conviction of our intelligence services that the Russians HAD TRIED, or even WERE SUCCESSFUL IN, stealing the election

Explain to me how this particular statement has ANYTHING to do with the total 100% incompetence of the people who were there "BEFORE" he became President?


Sounds like you are simply trying to deflect from the question at hand!


But it's interesting how TDS can convince people like to not only believe that Trump was at fault for things that happened when Obama was President, but to also to find imaginative (but completely illogical) ways to to continue making that argument.

Honest, decent, truthful Rev. said...

"...said the current and former officials who spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the issue’s sensitivity."

Also because they fear ridicule and persecution from Devious Donald?

Honest, decent, truthful Rev. said...

lol
WHO is more "totally incompetent," CH?

caliphate4vr said...

ok


...said the current and former officials who spoke on the condition of anonymity...


huh.

so we have another round of "let's make shit up and attribute anonymous sources."

fucking evergreen.

LOL.

good job, pederast.


He's fucking stupid.

You probably heard it

A communist, Islamist and liar walk into a bar

Bartender says, Hello Mr Brennan

Trump said...

"Vladimir (a fine fellow, by the way) told me the Russians didn't do it and I believe him... Obama made me say that."

C.H. Truth said...

WHO is more "totally incompetent," CH?

Stupid is as stupid does...

Which President got totally fooled by Putin, had an election under their supervision hacked, spent millions chasing a conspiracy theory, destroyed the reputation of the FBI, undermined the reputation on intelligence in general...

and did so because they believe research from some hack who actually charged their Party money to provide them with Russian interference that ultimately made them look like rank amateur fools.


Who is really incompetent is not a subjective opinion.

It's a proven factual concept. Obama and his team proved it by their actions!

Honest, decent, truthful Rev. said...

It's all Obama's fault, says Ch.
But read the following article.

Honest, decent, truthful Rev. said...

Herald Examiner Editorial Soon after the Election:

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell should explain why he blocked a bipartisan denunciation of Russian interference in our election before voters went to the polls.

Americans deserve to hear why McConnell did not trust them with the evidence that he and 11 other congressional leaders received in a confidential briefing in September.

The Washington Post reports that during that briefing McConnell “made clear to the administration that he would consider any effort by the White House to challenge the Russians publicly an act of partisan politics.”

McConnell also questioned the veracity of the intelligence, according to the Post, based on information from unidentified officials present at the September briefing.

On Monday, McConnell said he had the “highest confidence” in U.S. intelligence agencies.

But McConnell would not answer reporters’ questions about the Post’s account. He passed up the opportunity to deny that he torpedoed the administration’s request for a bipartisan pre-election statement calling out the Russians.

Now McConnell and other Republicans are saying the integrity of our elections is too important for partisanship. But before the election McConnell appears to have put partisan concerns first.

It’s impossible to say whether the outcome would have changed if Republicans and Democrats in Congress had united to publicly rebuke Russia.

There was plenty of information out about Russians hacking the Democratic National Committee and a couple of state election offices. The Department of Homeland Security and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence issued an election security statement on Oct. 7 urging “state and local election officials to be vigilant and seek cybersecurity assistance from DHS.”

It also was clear that Russian President Vladimir Putin preferred Republican Donald Trump over Democrat Hillary Clinton, whom he blamed for public protests against him in Russia.

Trump probably would have won and the Republicans probably would have held the Senate even if Congress had denounced Russia before the election.

Now McConnell’s pre-election move to obscure Russian interference will weaken Trump’s standing as president, an office he won by the thinnest of margins. McConnell’s action, which if anything helped Trump, also clouds Trump’s nomination of Elaine Chao, McConnell’s wife, as transportation secretary.

The CIA more recently concluded that the Russians’ goal was not just to disrupt the election but to elect Trump, a conclusion still questioned by the FBI.

Russian interference could yet disrupt the election, as some members of the Electoral College are demanding a briefing from U.S. intelligence agencies before confirming Trump as president Dec. 19.

It remains to be seen whether congressional committees controlled by Republicans will bring real enthusiasm to investigating the Russian interference and its effects, or make their findings public.

If they hope to restore the trust of a large segment of the American public, they will err on the side of transparency, which is what McConnell should have done before the election.

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

Putin was laughing is ass off at people like you, who believe Obama/Biden0/Comey/Brennan/Clapper... as a bunch of useful idiots for his cause, and blame Ukraine for the Russian intervention into the election cycle of 2016.

Honest, decent, truthful Rev. said...

Trump's reasoning for being so malleable to Putin is obvious: He helped me get elected.

C.H. Truth said...

James...

How does ANYTHING that took place "AFTER" the election help make Obama look any less STUPID for things that happened before and during the election.

There was no Russian 2016 election interference that took place "AFTER" the election was over. The election interference took place "prior" to it.

When Obama and his intelligence cronies first got wind of possible Russian interference... what did they do? Did they work to stop it? Did they alert election officials? Did they investigate the Russians!?

Nope. They had Carter Page followed and ran agents at George Papadopoulos to figure out if he was somehow involved. Rather than trying to preent Russia from doing something, they concentrated on trying to prove somehow that Trump campaign members were behind it.

I mean, it's like the fucking three stooges were running the show. It's a colossal mistake and a colossal failure and a colossal excuse to blame things that happened "after" the election as if they matter.

C.H. Truth said...

Only a complete moron would offer that only ONE country could possibly have interfered in our election?

How does that work, anyways Roger?

Does one country get to call "dibs" and then they are the only ones who get to interfere? Because I am pretty sure that Russia was not the only ones who interfered.

But stupid people fall for stupid talking points!

Honest, decent, truthful Rev. said...

Does McConnell look stupid or even criminal for how he blocked a bipartisan denunciation of Russian interference in our election?

I admit, Obama should have blown the whistle on the entire thing no matter how much he might have been criticized for trying to influence the election by revealing that the Russians wanted Trump elected.

Anonymous said...

James Posted under yet another hiding ID
"How many of you Repugs got some of Devious Donald's clean coal in your stocking for Christmas?"

Answer = Zero

James why can't you post without Name calling?

Anonymous said...

Dennis, your post said I have "followers".

Strange you posted it. Do you "follow" me, if yes, please stop.

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Anonymous said...

Big Winners
Chiefs and all the new guys that joined .

Losers
LA Chargers (currently SD Chargers)
LA Rams
LA Radiers

San Francisco for become the public out house of the USA . fitting it is Speaker in Name Only Polosi district.

Anonymous said...

Micheal Blooberg Socialist Democrat Dwarf.

"And together, we can send him back to not Mar-a-Lago, but to Mother Russia."

Anonymous said...

Washington post
"Here are 18 reasons Trump could be a Russian asset"

aka Spy.

C.H. Truth said...

I admit, Obama should have blown the whistle on the entire thing no matter how much he might have been criticized for trying to influence the election by revealing that the Russians wanted Trump elected.

It's not about "TALK" James.

Boy oh boy, you place an incredible amount of importance on rhetoric and almost no importance on what gets done and what actions are completed.

The FBI had a ton of resources on the case. They had a whole "name" for it! It was called Hurricane Crossfire and it started in July of 2016, months before the election!

How much effort was taken to ensure that Russia, Ukraine, and other countries didn't interfere in our election? Very little!

How much idiotic partisan nonsensical unprofessional career ending time did they spend trying to implicate the Trump team? Pretty much 99% of their time was spent trying to implicate Trump.


So James... this was not about Obama (or anyone else) telling people, "Hey the Russians are trying to infiltrate the Candidate and Party servers" - because they actually warned everyone involved. Some listened and incompetent Candidates and Parties got hacked in spite of the warnings.

(good thing they didn't win, or we might be still have not figured out what happened)

This was about them doing something "more" than spending all of their time focused on Trump and his Campaign.

Now if you do not believe that this was some sort of nefarious anti-Trump bring him down sort of thing... the other plausible conclusion (which was offered by Horowitz) was blindingly excessive incompetence to the level we have never, ever seen in our Intelligence organizations.


They dropped ball, because they were looking elsewhere. Either by choice or because they were just collectively a bunch of morons.


Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

You are a talking point Ringo Starr. 🏟

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

The deep state conspiracy theory bullshit has rottened you're mind.

How much idiotic partisan nonsensical unprofessional career ending time did they spend trying to implicate the Trump team? Pretty much 99% of their time was spent trying to implicate Trump.

Anonymous said...

2019 was a year that he went from a net worth of well North of $1 million and a six figure income (his words) to force eviction for non-payment, homelessness, Suicidial state of mind and clinical depression (and his wirds). cherry onto his dumpy little pigmy wife kicked him to the curb.

Could not have happened to a better person.

C.H. Truth said...

Well Roger...

Are now denying reality?

Reality is that Hurricane crossfire was very little about Russia and very much about implicating Trump. That's simply a fact. The latest report from Horowitz is just part of the overall evidence of that.

Since when has it been partisan to point out facts?

Anonymous said...

Good News, Roger posted on Facebook that in 2020 he will move into a huge house, but a big car and have more money then God.

His plan to earn it.... unstated... developing....

Anonymous said...

Senate Democrats are publically leading that they will vote to ACQUIT.

Bi-Partisan AGAINST Impeachment and Remove.

Pelosi has the Impeachy Thingy up her ass.

Anonymous said...

Roger, you low life stupid mope.

You are dead ass wrong on retail sales.
Make us all a promise , you will never ever again attempt to talk about the Adults only topic of Marco/Micro Economics.

Anonymous said...

Mrs. Jane like President Obama for his "Talk".

We Conservative like A President that "Does".

"American companies have brought $1 trillion back to the United States since the passage of President Donald Trump’s tax cuts in 2017, according to new U.S. Department of Commerce data."

Honest, decent, truthful Rev. said...

Germans Say Trump a Bigger Danger Than Dictators
December 26, 2019 at 6:29 pm EST

A new YouGov survey finds 41% of Germans believe President Trump is more of a threat to world peace than North Korean dictator Kim Jong-un, Russian President Vladimir Putin, Chinese President Xi Jinping or Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.

“The results show the degree to which trust in U.S. leadership has eroded under Trump, even among countries like Germany that are traditionally viewed as close allies.”

Honest, decent, truthful Rev. said...

More Think Trump Will Go Down in History as a Poor President

OBVIOUSLY.

December 26, 2019 at 6:27 pm EST

A new Economist/YouGov survey asked 1,500 U.S. adults how they thought President Trump would be remembered. Poll participants were asked to choose from the options “outstanding,” “above average,” “average,” “below average” or “poor.”

The largest share of respondents—40 percent—said they Trump will be described in the history books as a “poor” commander-in-chief. Another 9 percent of those polled said that Trump would go down as a “below average” president.

DON'T TELL DEVIOUS DONALD. IT COULD SEND HIM STRAIGHT INTO THAT STRAIGHT JACKET THEY ARE KEEPING ON HAND JUST IN CASE.

Honest, decent, truthful Rev. said...

Once they've got him in the jacket, he won't be able to press any buttons to start a nuclear war.

Anonymous said...

LOL @ Jane

Lost every debate here so call Trump a Nazi and Trump wants Nuclear war.