Monday, January 20, 2020

San Fran vs K.C.

One of these two QBs will start their legacy!


Two impressive wins by two pretty impressive teams. Mahomes sort of took over his game, whereas Garoppolo  just sort of ran the offense. The thing that sticks out to me is the 49er Defensive front. They dominated all through the playoffs and may just have the speed and talent to contain Mahomes. 

Not exactly a game for the ages, but an interesting matchup non-the-less. 

25 comments:

Myballs said...

We could make it political. Trump supporting heartland vs Pelosi's San Francisco.

Myballs said...

Biden still lying about Trump backing kkk. It's amazing what a shitty candidate he is.

Myballs said...

Trump now proven right about Puerto Rico corruption and incompetence. That San jysn mayor can kiss our asses.

Honest, decent, truthful Rev. said...

Trump Has Made 16,241 False Statements In 3 Years
January 20, 2020 at 7:00 am EST

Washington Post:
“Three years after taking the oath of office, President Trump has made more than 16,200 false or misleading claims — a milestone that would have been unthinkable when we first created the Fact Checker’s database that analyzes, categorizes and tracks every suspect statement he has uttered.”

One thing for certain: He'll never make it to Mt. Rushmore.

Honest, decent, truthful Rev. said...

New York Times Endorses Klobuchar and Warren
January 19, 2020 at 11:47 pm EST

New York Times:
“The history of the editorial board would suggest that we would side squarely with the candidate with a more traditional approach to pushing the nation forward, within the realities of a constitutional framework and a multiparty country. But the events of the past few years have shaken the confidence of even the most committed institutionalists. We are not veering away from the values we espouse, but we are rattled by the weakness of the institutions that we trusted to undergird those values.

“There are legitimate questions about whether our democratic system is fundamentally broken. Our elections are getting less free and fair, Congress and the courts are increasingly partisan, foreign nations are flooding society with misinformation, a deluge of money flows through our politics. And the economic mobility that made the American dream possible is vanishing.

“Both the radical and the realist models warrant serious consideration. If there were ever a time to be open to new ideas, it is now. If there were ever a time to seek stability, now is it.

“That’s why we’re endorsing the most effective advocates for each approach. They are Elizabeth Warren and Amy Klobuchar.”

Honest, decent, truthful Rev. said...

Klobuchar Picks Up Iowa Newspaper Endorsement
January 20, 2020 at 7:06 am EST

Quad City Times: “Amy Klobuchar earned our endorsement.”

“She won it from an editorial board that, like much of the electorate just two weeks away from the Iowa caucuses, has struggled with how to assess the large field of candidates vying for the Democrats’ 2020 presidential nomination.”

Honest, decent, truthful Rev. said...

Trump's Latest Lie

"To protect national security" will be Trump's latest lie to try to keep the Senate from calling for additional witnesses.

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Honest, decent, truthful Rev. said...

TWO TWEETS

“Democrats will force votes on witnesses and documents.”

“Trials have witnesses and documents. Cover-ups don’t.”
— Sen Chuck Schumer (D-NY)

Anonymous said...

The Three Socialist Stooges of CHT wrong again.

"Support for President Donald Trump among American farmers is on the rise, according to a new poll released this week.

According to the latest Farm Journal Pulse Poll, which featured responses from 1,286 farmers, President Trump received an approval rating of 83 percent, a point higher than the previous poll. Only 18 percent disapprove of President Trump. Since Farm Journal’s tracking of Trump’s support from farmers in recent months, the latest poll marks his highest approval."

Mahomes is an unbelievable talent.
The Miners of SF have a great Defense.


Anonymous said...




heh:


In other words, the big picture here is that it seems as though the Senate will move forward with an actual trial—details on a number of fronts on that as of yet to be determined—but that there will be one thing that is clear: If Schiff or the Democrats try anything untoward like they did in the House, the president and the Senate have the option to shut the whole thing down and blow it all up on them. That means Republicans hold the upper hand, and should things get crazy—while there are not currently enough votes to dismiss the trial or outright off the bat acquit Trump—after Democrat partisan gamesmanship there likely would be enough votes to dismiss the whole thing. Bad behavior, in a partisan way, from people such as Schiff and Nadler and other Democrats could drive more Republicans toward the motion to dismiss—the kill switch—if that ever becomes necessary.

McConnell, who a losing GOP primary candidate in West Virginia once derisively nicknamed “Cocaine Mitch”—a nickname he’s since embraced as indicative of his tough persona—has a history of outsmarting Democrats in the Senate. Most notably, McConnell beat them when they tried in late 2018 to tank the Supreme Court confirmation of now Justice Brett Kavanaugh. McConnell has had many other such end-run victories around the Democrats, and sources close to him expect this Senate impeachment trial will be no different.

“My pal Cocaine Mitch is again proving his mettle when it comes to outmaneuvering leftist Democrats with this kill switch,” a source close to McConnell told Breitbart News. “If they even think about stepping out of line and being unfair in the slightest, it’s time to engage said kill switch and end this nonsense once and for all.”



https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/01/19/the-impeachment-kill-switch-mcconnell-dismissal-rule-corners-democrats-blocks-antics-as-trial-commences/

Anonymous said...

A yes water boi Jane moves to "Cover up".

Mindless Dolt.

Anonymous said...




Several days ago, Trump’s campaign manager Brad Parscale posted statistics from last week’s rally held in Toledo, OH, which showed that 43% of attendees identified as either Democratic or Independent. I called that figure “stunning” in a recent post.

But the same statistic from Trump’s Tuesday night rally in Wisconsin can only be described as staggering. 57.8% of registrants identified as either Democratic or Independent.


https://www.redstate.com/elizabeth-vaughn/2020/01/16/766723/

Honest, decent, truthful Rev. said...

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell is preparing a resolution that would leave room for President Trump's lawyers to move immediately to dismiss the impeachment charges if they so choose, according to Republican Sen. Josh Hawley.

Yes, but:
Republican Senate leaders, including McConnell and Roy Blunt, the senior senator from Missouri, have already said members aren't interested in a vote to dismiss. And it seems unlikely that Trump's team would push for what would almost certainly be a losing vote — a move that could be seen as a sign of weakness at the outset of the trial.

Behind the scenes: "I am familiar with the resolution as it stood a day or two ago," Hawley, the junior senator from Missouri, told me in a phone interview on Saturday. "My understanding is that the resolution will give the president's team the option to either move to judgment or to move to dismiss at a meaningful time..."

Hawley added that in the most recent draft of the organizing resolution he saw there was an option for the president's counsel to make a motion in multiple places, including at the beginning of the proceedings.

A Republican leadership aide responded: "The White House has the right to make motions under the regular order, including a motion to dismiss, right after the resolution is adopted because a motion to dismiss is a motion permitted by the impeachment rules."

Hawley added that if the final resolution does not allow Trump's lawyers the option to dismiss or move to judgment at a "meaningful point" in the trial, he would be "very, very surprised," and might not vote for the organizing resolution.

Hawley also said he worries that if Trump doesn't have the option to move to dismiss or move to judgment then Adam Schiff would have too much control over the trial.


Honest, decent, truthful Rev. said...

The state of play: There have been multiple indications — including from McConnell himself — that the Senate will not vote to dismiss the charges of impeachment against the president.

"There is little or no sentiment in the Republican conference for a motion to dismiss," McConnell told reporters on Jan. 14. "Our members feel that we have an obligation to listen to the arguments."

He said the resolution would lay out a way for senators to listen to the prosecution and defense and follow up with written questions submitted through the presiding officer Chief Justice John Roberts. "That means listening to the case, not dismissing the case."


That's certainly true for moderate or purple-state Republican senators up for re-election, such as Maine's Susan Collins. They have sought to show they are taking impeachment seriously and have tried to steer away from actions that would suggest they are dismissing the case against the president out of hand.

The big picture: Trump endorsed on Twitter the idea of outright dismissal of the charges against him. It could be an opportunity for some of Trump's closest Senate Republican allies to register their contempt for the case that House Democrats marshaled against the president — even if the motion is doomed to fail.

It could also serve as a break-glass option if the trial took a turn and Trump's allies felt they needed a mechanism to bring about an abrupt end to the trial.
What's next: Trump's team says it wants a fast impeachment trial, and Republicans are preparing for the possibility of a time frame as short as two weeks.

But there will be opportunities for curve balls that may extend throughout the trial.

Collins has joined several other Republican senators, including Mitt Romney, in saying they want to be able to vote to hear from additional witnesses — a key demand of Senate Democrats.

They are expected to be given that vote after the Senate has heard each sides' opening arguments.
.

C.H. Truth said...

James...

The idea of the "Kill Switch" is entirely different from an upfront vote to dismiss the charges. The "Kill Switch" would go into effect precisely if (or possibly when) there gets to be 51 Republicans who have seen enough.

Generally you simply choose to (or vote to) dismiss charges at the beginning of a trial. If you get past the dismissal, then you move on to the trial and the trial runs it's course to completion.

The "Kill Switch" would allow that vote for dismissal to take place at any time "during" the trial, which would prevent the Democrats from turning it into a circus. It's literally... okay, we've had enough of this nonsense. Let's end it.

If they call for the "Kill Switch" vote... rest assured that they will already have the 51 votes necessary for it to pass.

JAMES'S FUCKING DADDY said...


To me it looks like free money on the over (53.5)

They may hit that by halftime

and I see the desperate panicking POS "pastor" james brings his waterboy experience to this thread

ROFLMFAO !!!

Honest, decent, truthful Rev. said...

If the Republicans are saying, we've had enough of this at precisely the time the public is finding the proceedings quite revealing, killing those proceedings would deep six Trump's re-election.

JAMES'S FUCKING DADDY said...


the public is seeing the sham impeachment for what it is, this is helping Trump.

waterboys need to stay on the bench.

ROFLMFAO !!!

Honest, decent, truthful Rev. said...

And besides, killing the proceedings would not stop the ongoing revelation of new information. Nobody could stop Bolton, for example, from agreeing to be interviewed by various news media. And he has a book that will be coming out.

Anonymous said...

Blogger James said...

If the Republicans are saying, we've had enough of this at precisely the time the public is finding the proceedings quite revealing, killing those proceedings would deep six Trump's re-election.



only in your wildest dreams, pederast.
it's obvious you're in panic mode.


and as a reminder -

Several days ago, Trump’s campaign manager Brad Parscale posted statistics from last week’s rally held in Toledo, OH, which showed that 43% of attendees identified as either Democratic or Independent. I called that figure “stunning” in a recent post.

But the same statistic from Trump’s Tuesday night rally in Wisconsin can only be described as staggering. 57.8% of registrants identified as either Democratic or Independent.


https://www.redstate.com/elizabeth-vaughn/2020/01/16/766723/

trump is also enjoying an ever increasing percentage of the black vote.

notable on this MLK day, wouldn't you say?

LOL.

Anonymous said...



Nobody could stop Bolton, for example, from agreeing to be interviewed by various news media.


bolton, bolton, bolton.

everyone is assuming that anything bolton has to say would be automatically harmful to trump. yet what we seem to be lacking so far is any evidence to support this claim.

i suspect that bolton being the war hawk that he is was quite pleased when trump turned soleimani into road pizza.

perhaps the pederast could provide us with some assurances that a bolton testimony would be a negative for trump. or is the pederast simply an echo chamber for teegen goddard?



Anonymous said...

RRB NOTICE.

Have you notice how the Republic is stronger Under Trump and how the Senate Republicans have got a backbone since mcstain crooked.

Anonymous said...

"or is the pederast simply an echo chamber for teegen goddard?" RRB

Yes, and others, in James words "unimportant" cunt n pastes.

cowardly king obama said...

Jesse Kelly
@JesseKellyDC

To be fair, the Green Bay Packers are hardly the first people to take a dump in San Francisco. #GBvsSF