Biden leads Trump by six points in the most recent ABC/WaPo poll (when all candidates are listed) and the NYT Siena poll shows Biden leading by eight. It seems like every time there are some pollsters (generally independent pollsters) that show the race tightening, the media polls come along and repute them.
The ABC/WaPo poll is being headlined as a double digit ten point lead, which is hypothetically what Biden would have if there were no third Party candidates to choose from. But when you include the Libertarian and Green Party candidates many of the Independent Biden supporter appear to wander over to these candidates. It would be interesting to see if Kayne West actually would receive any polling support (as he will appear in several state ballots as a Presidential candidate) if he was also listed as a choice.
Not sure why anyone would want to pretend that third Party candidates do not exist, but it would be very curious to see how many of these other polls would tighten if you allowed these other choices to exist. Many are still only polling a two way race. This was also a major factor in 2016 polling where Clinton similarly polled better when only two options were provided, while Trump polled better in a three or four way race.
What this strongly suggests is that there is plenty of independents who are very luke warm about voting for Joe Biden. Him winning them over for good might be the difference between another 2016 sort of election and the significant Biden victory that many polls suggest.
Neither of these polls provided much for cross tabs and from what was provided it was difficult to mathematically tie those cross tabs to the top line being reported. What I can tell you in general with 2020 polling is that while there is a still a noticeable difference in the Demographic breakdown in comparison to historical precedent, the bigger difference between what I see in 2020 vs 2016 is the extremely wide range of how pollsters are seeing independents (which might be due to whether or not third Party candidates are listed).
So far I have seen cross tabs showing Trump leading with Independents by a couple points more than he won them in 2016 to Biden winning them by twenty points or more (Trump won Independents in 2016 by four). We are literally seeing a spread between highs and lows of nearly thirty points as it pertains to independents. Which is correct? I don't have a difficult time believing that Independents might shift from election to election, such is the nature of that beast. But I do find it difficult to believe that they would shift by as much as twenty five points (as some polls are suggesting).
180 comments:
Care to give us your prediction of the final electoral votes tallies for the election?
Care to give us your prediction of the final electoral votes tallies for the election?
Only an idiot would ask someone to provide "final predictions" well over a month before the election and before we have even had a single debate.
LOL I will give you my "foolish" tallies somewhere below.
Meanwhile, this is interesting:
In the latest polling, Biden is headed UP in NC.
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2020/president/nc/north_carolina_trump_vs_biden-6744.html
😃Only an idiot🤣
🤡Clown Jane stepped right up.
James, why do you constantly call so many of us here "names"?
I guess I shouldn't. I mean, nobody calls Obama a black monkey or his wife a cheap Chicago whore or me a pederast or a POS, do they?
James said...
(nobody calls) me a pederast or a POS, do they?
Only people paying attention to what you say.
And I will now add RACIST after today's comments by you.
Because I label Larry Elder a racist? I also label David Duke a racist. Also Donald Trump.
Paul Bedard
@SecretsBedard
Day 10 of Trump 50% or higher approval in @Rasmussen_Poll.
@jmclghln 'For President Trump to have weathered so many critical issues this election year and receive the approval of the majority of voters is the most important bellwether for his re-election https://washex.am/3mPb5DH
Rasmussen Reports
@Rasmussen_Poll
Interesting: "the approval of the majority of voters is the most important bellwether for ( @POTUS ) re-election"
And for some reason we are STILL the ONLY firm doing daily presidential approval tracking in these critical final weeks before the Nov elections.
Wonder why?
It is a bit puzzling unless they have daily tracking polls and don't want to release them... like if they had a polling narrative they wanted to maintain ???
Existed in prior elections ????
Only an idiot would ask someone to provide "final predictions" well over a month before the election
And only lil SCHITTY would come up with 14 excuses to prove he don't know shit and is afraid to make a prediction !!!!! bwaaaaaapaaaaaa!!!!
Maybe Lil Schitty will weigh in on whether the vaccine will be ready by Nov!!!!!!! Seems to me that is a 50=50 choice and even simplistic scott can handle that!!!!!
I will say this FOR Larry Elder, however (I do listen to him at night, some):
A while back, I was deeply moved by his description of his relationship with his father as he was growing up.
But when I hear him defending even Trump's making fun of the handicapped reporter--
James said...
Larry Elder, Republican Uncle Tom despised by most blacks.
Larry is a BISCO.
(black in skin color only)
let's see if the racist lying POS "pastor" can figure it out.
Biden said he was a student at Delaware State University; school says otherwise
Trump says Obama should have released his academic transcripts.
Trump refuses to release his own.
the lying racist POS "pastor" said:
But when I hear him defending even Trump's making fun of the handicapped reporter-
That LIE has been totally debunked so many times, including to you, that it is not worth to even dig up a response again. You just keep repeating LIES, your normal tactic.
What a lying POS you are
A sizable gender gap continues to fuel Biden’s lead, with women making the difference in the current state of the race. Trump has a lead of 55 percent to 42 percent among male likely voters, but Biden has an even larger 65 percent to 34 percent advantage among female likely voters. Trump’s lead among men is about the same as his margin over Hillary Clinton in 2016, but Biden’s lead among women is more than twice as large as Clinton’s was then.
The women will elect Biden
Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump
VIDEO
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1309876047324893188
The truth is coming out on OBAMAGATE while the MSM hopes to run out the clock (and may push it out past the election)
Hopefully they keep getting actual documents out, and not Schiff's lies about what they said.
Schiff was a total LIAR. Backed by the legacy media.
But I do find it difficult to believe that they would shift by as much as twenty five points (as some polls are suggesting).
The MSM is a deep state conspiracy to defeat Trump!
10:20 All you have to do is look at the tape.
Political Wire
New Senate Polls
1:03 am EDT
From CBS News/YouGov:
NORTH CAROLINA:
Cunningham (D) 48%, Tillis (R) 38%
SOUTH CAROLINA:
Graham (R) 45%, Harrison (D)44%
GEORGIA:
Perdue (R) 47%, Ossoff (D) 42%
From NBC News/Marist:
MICHIGAN:
Peters (D) 49%, James (R) 44%
WOW! READ THIS!
Tom Ridge Endorses Biden
10:58
Former Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Ridge (R) endorsed Joe Biden for president in a Philadelphia Inquirer op-ed.
Writes Ridge:
“Donald Trump has proven over these last four years he is incapable of such leadership. It is not within him. He lacks the empathy, integrity, intellect and maturity to lead.
“He sows division along political, racial and religious lines. And he routinely dismisses the opinions of experts who know far more about the subject at hand than he does — intelligence, military, and public health. Our country has paid dearly in lives lost, social unrest, economic hardship and our standing in the world.”
New Battleground State Polls
10:55 am
From NBC News/Marist:
MICHIGAN:
Biden 52%, Trump 44%
WISCONSIN:
Biden 54%, Trump 44%
From CBS News/YouGov:
NORTH CAROLINA:
Biden 48%, Trump 46%
GEORGIA:
Trump 47%, Biden 46%
Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump
I will be strongly demanding a Drug Test of Sleepy Joe Biden prior to, or after, the Debate on Tuesday night. Naturally, I will agree to take one also. His Debate performances have been record setting UNEVEN, to put it mildly. Only drugs could have caused this discrepancy???
I'll believe Joe shows up when I see it, but if he does you know he's going to be "pumped up".
James said...
10:20 All you have to do is look at the tape.
We've been through that all before. Either you have a Biden condition or you are just braindead.
What Trump did on your "tape" you refer to is a regular mannerism he has used MANY times as has been shown to you before.
FUCK OFF
What a POS of a "pastor", I can see why he is not preaching.
I met Tom Ridge a couple years ago. At a law school graduation in Pittsburgh. Nice guy.
James, you lie, hide and run.
You are a lesser to all of us.
Thecoldheartedtruth has been avoiding the President's decision to not accept the results of the election.
President Donald Trump this week refused to commit to a peaceful transition should he lose the November election, leading some to speculate that he might seek to use the tools of presidential power including his role as commander in chief of the armed forces to prolong his time in office.
This is the greatest threat to the United States in history.
But he tries to discredit the MSM and ignored that the pandemic has infected over 7 million Americans, who would have a pre existing condition that would condemn them to death, because they are trying to overturn the ACA that would leave 100 millions without health care coverage.
Not accept the results if it's a rigged election. The rest of the sentence matters.
He's a traitor because he won't vote for Trump????
Even if there is no credible evidence of voter fraud, he will say that it's rigged and he will not leave office voluntarily, and you hope that he will destroy the country because you hate liberals!
So obama did nominate Garland just before the election. Just like Trump. So it's really McConnell that dems should be mad at. Although, Mitch probably did this ad payback for the outrageous way dems treated kavanaugh.
There's already evidence of election fraud.
The FBI director Wray said that there is no credible evidence of voter fraud, but the President's chief of staff said that Wray can't even find the emails about Hillary Clinton!
Trump is a clear and present danger to the Constitution and the United States of America.
The Democrats have to get out the vote in record numbers so he can't claim fraud!
Anonymous Myballs said...
There's already evidence of election fraud.
And there is evidence that you are mentally retarded!!!!!!!! BWAAAAAAPAAAAAA!!!!! God you need help
Ask the director of the FBI Wray, why did he testify under oath, saying that there is no evidence of voter fraud in the general election!
Actually he said no evidence of a national voter fraud campaign. There are many local indictments of it.
Anonymous Myballs said...
So obama did nominate Garland just before the election.
Define just you moronic asshole!!!!!!!! Didn't lindsey graham state that he would not support a nomination in the 4 th year of a presidency?????? Didn't McConnell deny a vote on garland because he felt the citizens should decide a president????? Or did you forget all that ballz as a giant trump slurper!!!!!
There are many local indictments of it
Really????? Why don't you provide a few that would be indicative of what trump is talking about nationally you dumb ass!!!!!
Roger Amick said...
The FBI director Wray said that there is no credible evidence of voter fraud
Then obviously Wray is not credible.
He is a swamp creature who snuck into his job. The FBI leadership was full of more of them than Trump imagined.
Read what has come out about OBAMAGATE.
FBI agents were worried about what they were being told to do from above and discussing how Trump was right and getting insurance to cover their butts.
It will take a second term for it to all come out with all the resistance to get to the truth and delaying tactics.
I suspect if Trump were to lose he would order it all to be declassified before he leaves office. Of course that would be too late but maybe some justice would result.
thebradfordfile™
@thebradfordfile
If Amy Coney Barrett received $3.5 million from the wife of the mayor of Moscow--would the media still ignore it?
not a smidgen of media bias, move along
FBI Director Christopher Wray responded to a question on the security of mail-in voting to the Senate Homeland Security Committee on Thursday by saying that the agency has "not seen, historically, any kind of coordinated national voter fraud effort in a major election, whether it's by mail or otherwise."
A few minor elections in cities have had voter fraud, but there is no evidence of voter fraud in the General election system or the Senate and house of Representatives elections.
You are supposed to be an analyst, but in regards to politics you have become a cultists.
History shows that dictators gained power by creating a false narrative.
750 to 1,000 per day are dying!
Trump just tweeted a new tirade about the ACA. He has previously said that in 2 weeks we will have a plan!
Obamacare will be replaced with a MUCH better, and FAR cheaper, alternative if it is terminated in the Supreme Court. Would be a big WIN for the USA!
Thursday night he went nuts
He pointed to the crowd
"We also have some of our really unbelievable undercover operatives, and if you don't mind, I won't introduce them all right, I don't think we're going to introduce them. I want to so badly. I want to have him stand up, bring him up here. I want to hug him and kiss him which I'm not allowed to do because of social distancing, but somehow they may lose some effectiveness if I introduced him so they're in the crowd."
FiveThirtyEight said that Biden has a 75% chance of victory in November.
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2020-election-forecast/
10 times this month Biden had nothing scheduled. He is not up to the job. Do 5he dems here not want to see him?? Indy voters will not vote for him if he keeps hiding.
538 had Hillary 72% .
Trump appointed him.
Troll
He just gave a speech on health care coverage that is at risk forever if Trump succeeds to steal the election
The polls 4 years ago are irrelevant because Trump is the incumbent President, and Biden is not Hillary Clinton
Roger Amick said...
Trump appointed him.
DUH !!!
and regrets it I'm sure
Racist Roger Amick said...
The polls 4 years ago are irrelevant because Trump is the incumbent President, and Biden is not Hillary Clinton
Biden is an even worse candidate.
Dementia Joe and cum allah
what a ticket
The only incumbent President who had an approval rating as low as Trump was George H.W Bush vs. Bill Clinton.
Clinton won by a substantial margin
Biden called a lid 7 of last 14 days. He is not up to the job.
If Biden believed in science and health care he would be in an assisted living home.
I'm sure Fauci will recommend that
ROFLMFAO !!!
Troll
James Woods
@RealJamesWoods
It is absolutely inconceivable that America would vote for a Kamala Harris presidency. Her own party couldn’t wait to get rid of her in the primaries. Do Americans grasp the fact that Joe Biden is not running for president? He is merely a husk for a Kamala Harris presidency.
hopefully people will figure it out.
Roger Amick
Racist
Trump War Room
@TrumpWarRoom
After months of anti-police rhetoric from Joe Biden's Democratic party, Westmoreland County Sheriff James Albert has decided to leave the party and join the GOP.
In an interview with Fox & Friends, the lifelong Democrat said, "I didn’t leave the Democratic party, it left me!"
See the light
Join the fight
Trump 2020
Clinton won by a substantial margin
no he didn't.
he won with a plurality, you idiot.
some historian you are.
Desperate
I will be strongly demanding a Drug Test of Sleepy Joe Biden prior to, or after, the Debate on Tuesday night. Naturally, I will agree to take one also. His Debate performances have been record setting UNEVEN, to put it mildly. Only drugs could have caused this discrepancy???
"Trump is a clear and present danger to the Constitution and the United States of America."Alky Nov. 9th, 2016
Dan Bongino
@dbongino
Really incredible that it’s now confirmed that the FBI used a suspected Russian agent to spy on a Trump’s campaign and it’s not a front page story all over the world. The lib media is an embarrassing failure.
FACT CHECK: TRUE
https://www.newsbreakapp.com/n/0X7LwmnL?s=a99&pd=06knAsNf
ðŸ˜Roger AmickNovember 8, 2016 at 8:37 PM
Right ow my map is no undecided and my projections and what it looks like now, 289 247 Clinton. Florida to Trump
🤣
rrb said...
Clinton won by a substantial margin
no he didn't.
he won with a plurality, you idiot.
some historian you are.
A TDS infected "historian"
Trump loves voter suppression. Yeah, Skippy..We've been paying attention.
Sorry folks, it's not going to work. The REAL silent majority will be heard loud and clear on November 3rd. We The People have had enough of Donald J. Trump.
Trumpism stage four brain cancer is incurable!
Benny
@bennyjohnson
In 1991, Joe Biden said that in 2020, he would “be dead and gone in all probability”
Flash forward and he’s the current Democrat Nominee for President.
Wow
VIDEO of BIDEN STILL TALKING SENSE:
https://twitter.com/bennyjohnson/status/1310042915180367875
Now he's a dead man talking when he even gets up
Clinton won 538 members of the Electoral College.
Ima just leave this stupid ass claim right here
BTW oh great and knowledgeable one, there are only 538 total electors, I think HW won a couple
Idiot
Roger Amick said...
Clinton won 538 members of the Electoral College.
270 to win
September 27, 2020 at 12:05 PM
Blogger Roger Amick said...
Trumpism stage four brain cancer is incurable!
Obviously you mean TDS is incurable.
Take a cognitive test
Or just check into an assisted living facility, no test is really needed based on your ramblings.
When is your next med regiment ?
😂@Alky
"Roger AmickSeptember 27, 2020 at 12:05 PM
"Clinton won 538 members of the Electoral College."
James Fing Daddy.
Roger already did this:
"Or just check into an assisted living facility"
It was after his 2nd ex wife deposited him in the gutter, he became homeless and suicidal.
I admit mistakes, unlike Scott A**hole and the President.
Nominee Bill Clinton George H. W. Bush Ross Perot
Party Democratic Republican Independent
Home state Arkansas Texas Texas
Running mate Al Gore Dan Quayle James Stockdale
Electoral vote 370 168 0
States carried 32 + DC 18 0
Popular vote 44,909,889 39,104,550 19,743,821
Percentage 43.0% 37.4% 18.9%
RCP average
RCP Average 9/12 - 9/25 49.8 42.8 Biden +7.0
NYT/Siena 9/22 - 9/24 49 41 Biden +8
ABC/WP 9/21 - 9/24 54 44 Biden +10
Emerson 9/22 - 9/23 48 44 Biden +4
YouGov 9/20 - 9/22 49 42 Biden +7
The Hill 9/19 - 9/21 45 40 Biden +5
Reuters 9/18 - 9/22 50 42 Biden +8
Rasmussen 9/16 - 9/22 48 47 Biden +1
CNBC* 9/18 - 9/20 51 42 Biden +9
Quinnipiac 9/17 - 9/21 52 42 Biden +10
USC 9/12 - 9/25 51 42 Biden +9
JTN/RMG* 9/17 - 9/19 50 44 Biden +6
IBD/TIPP 9/16 - 9/19 50 44 Biden +6
NBC/WSJ 9/13 - 9/16 51 43 Biden +8
Roger, tell us, how come you don't post your news on your receipt of that new $85,ooo Audi A8, your mansion Home and your kill yuge bank acct.?
Clinton won by approximately 4.5 million votes.
Clinton created 21 million jobs and reduced the nation's debt to almost zero balance.
George W Bush tax cuts increased it dramatically and he left behind the worst recession since the Great Depression era.
Donald Trump's leadership has cost hundreds of thousand lives, and the Constitutional crisis in history.
Ex-Aides Weigh Speaking Out Against Trump
September 27, 2020 at 11:44 am EDT By Taegan Goddard
Associated Press:
“Mattis and Coats, like former White House chief of staff John Kelly and former national security adviser H.R. McMaster, have refrained from more explicit condemnations, often citing a ‘duty of silence’ or a long tradition of military officials staying out of politics.
“Efforts to draw them out are ongoing.
While former Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen appears disinclined to step forward,
there are hopes that former Secretary of State Rex Tillerson might be persuaded to comment and that Coats might be urged to say more.
And Kelly, a retired four-star general, is said to be on the fence and torn about the decision.”
___________
JAMES SAYS: I feel that some of these may be those who could affirm, if they would, that they actually heard Trump say what he said about losers and suckers. I think Kelly in particular was deeply disturbed about what he heard Trump say about -- I believe it was his own son's -- sacrifice of his life.
Roger, tell us, how come you don't post your news on your receipt of that new $85,ooo Audi A8, your mansion Home and your kill yuge bank acct.?
How to Debate Someone Who Lies
11:52 am EDT By Taegan Goddard
Richard Friedman:
“As a psychiatrist, I’d like to offer Mr. Biden some advice: Don’t waste your time fact-checking the president. If you attempt to counter every falsehood or distortion that Mr. Trump serves up, you will cede control of the debate. And, by trying to correct him, you will paradoxically strengthen the misinformation rather than undermine it. (Research shows that trying to correct a falsehood with truth can backfire by reinforcing the original lie.)
“Instead, Mr. Biden should use more powerful weapons that will put Mr. Trump on the defensive — and also tell the audience that the president is a dishonest narrator.
“The first weapon may be the most effective: humor and ridicule.”
"This is the way dictators come to power," historian Michael Beschloss warned in an MSNBC appearance on Thursday.
Get the inside track on the race for the White House with Business Insider's DC Bureau. Sign up here for our free event on September 29.
President Donald Trump is refusing to commit to a peaceful transfer of power, threatening to shatter a tradition that lies at the heart of the democratic process in the US. There are serious concerns among scholars that Trump is putting America's democracy in mortal danger.
Combined with Trump's relentless disinformation campaign, celebration of violence against journalists, and incitement of armed militias, historians and election experts warn that the president is mirroring the behavior of despots that the US generally leads the way in condemning before the world.
"I've been an election observer in broken authoritarian countries, and let me tell you: Trump's behavior would be swiftly and unequivocally condemned by all international election monitors if it was happening elsewhere. He is behaving like the despots past presidents condemned," Brian Klaas, a political scientist at the University College London, tweeted on Friday.
When asked whether he would commit to a peaceful transfer of power earlier this week, Trump suggested ballots would be thrown away.
"We're going to have to see what happens," Trump said when asked whether he would accept the final results of the election. "Get rid of the ballots and...there won't be a transfer, frankly. There will be a continuation."
Trump has given the country myriad signs that he will not concede under any circumstances, placing the US on the precipice of a political crisis the likes of which it has never experienced before. The president has repeatedly pushed the bogus assertion that the expanded access to mail-in voting for the 2020 election — a move designed to protect vulnerable people amid a pandemic — will lead to widespread voter fraud.
Top experts on democracy have been warning for years that Trump exhibits authoritarian tendencies. But their consternation appears to have ramped up significantly as Election Day draws closer and Trump essentially signals that he plans to do whatever it takes to stay in power.
'This is the way dictators come to power'
MSNBC's Rachel Maddow on Thursday asked historian Michael Beschloss if he could provide another example of a US president suggesting an election "ought to be disregarded."
"You want to go into history to look for something like this? Go into Italian history and look at Mussolini. This is the way dictators come to power," Beschloss said in response, comparing Trump to the fascist Italian leader Benito Mussolini.
"[Trump is] telling you what he intends to do. And we've got to make very sure that in the next five and half weeks and after, that we do not get into a situation where...Donald Trump announces that he's won and puts us in a situation where our democracy is being stolen minute by minute. This is not a drill," Beschloss added.
Biden Plans Train Tour
11:27 am
Bloomberg:
“After the debate, Biden is looking to match some of Trump’s frequency of campaign appearances, embarking on a train tour through Ohio and Pennsylvania, marking his first multi-day swing since March, according to a person familiar with the candidate’s travel plans.”
__________
New SENATE Polls
From CBS News/YouGov:
NORTH CAROLINA:
Cunningham (D) 48%, Tillis (R) 38%
SOUTH CAROLINA:
Graham (R) 45%,* Harrison (D) 44%
____
*this has got him BEGGING for money
GEORGIA:
Perdue (R) 47%, Ossoff (D) 42%
From NBC News/Marist:
MICHIGAN:
Peters (D) 49%, James (R) 44%
https://www.businessinsider.com/historians-election-experts-warn-trump-behaving-like-mussolini-2020-9
I have been saying the same thing before
Trump is a clear and present danger to the Constitution and the United States of America and for which it stands for all men and women are created equal.
Even Mooselimbs are beaners Olinsky
RealClearPolitics aggregates show
Biden tending UP in Wisconsin and North Carolina,
and down only a little in Arizona.
And this STILL, STILL, STILL has not changed:
RCP No Toss Ups Electoral Votes
353 Biden vs. 185 Trump
And this has not changed for a long time:
RCP No Toss Ups Senate Races
Dems 51 vs Repugs 49
Dems +4 (and counting)
Amid talk of civil war, America is already split – Trump Nation has seceded.
Robert Reich
What is America really fighting over in the upcoming election? Not any particular issue. Not even Democrats versus Republicans. The central fight is over Donald J Trump.
Where Law Ends review: why Mueller failed to hold Trump to account
Before Trump, most Americans weren’t especially passionate about politics. But Trump’s MO has been to force people to become passionate about him – to take fierce sides for or against. And he considers himself president only of the former, whom he calls “my people”.
Trump came to office with no agenda except to feed his monstrous ego. He has never fueled his base. His base has fueled him. Its adoration sustains him.
Thecoldheartedtruth is an example of Trumpism stage four brain cancer.
He's threatening to declare insurrections and use the armed forces to suppress voter results and declare a victory.
But, the problem is that, the politicians will eventually demand that he must allow a peaceful transition of power in January of 2021.
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/sep/27/donald-trump-american-civil-war-joe-biden-republicans-democrats-robert-reich
The Republican party will be a minority party for decades because of Trump being elected by a minority popular vote margin.
We got Trump because of Obama. The community organizer has divided the nation.
President Trump and Senate Republicans have badly mismanaged a deadly pandemic for months. Now, in the midst of an unprecedented public health crisis, they are willing to ram through a Supreme Court nominee—within days—who will vote to destroy the Affordable Care Act, kick millions of Americans off their health care, and eliminate protections for millions more who have preexisting conditions. This is an absolute outrage.
The American people will not stand for this cynical effort to fill a Supreme Court vacancy, just days before an election, with someone who will roll back basic protections for women, workers, voters, people of color, the LGBT community, and our environment. I strongly oppose this nomination and we must fight as hard as we can to ensure that this nominee is not confirmed.
Vote blue Wave tsunami warning signs are not going away!
Blogger Roger Amick said...
The Republican party will be a minority party for decades because of Trump being elected by a minority popular vote margin.
Just like you predicted after Obunghole’s victory. Your stupid never changes
Give you credit for consistency
Trump thrives on division.
He has never tried to go beyond his base.
That's why his approval ratings have never increased since he was elected President!
Wake up geez, you used to be somewhat responsible but not any more
Troll
You used to be lucid, now it’s cray cray all the way
More Republicans have gained a conscience.
WASHINGTON – Suckers and losers, warmongers and pu-----.
President Donald Trump has reportedly used those labels to describe American war heroes and Pentagon brass. It's enough to rankle even key Trump allies, including the top Republican on the House Armed Services Committee.
And it shows just how fraught Trump's relationship with the U.S. military has become.
"It’s a mix," Rep. Mac Thornberry, the vice chair of the Armed Services Committee, said when asked about Trump's standing with the Pentagon.
Thornberry himself took issue with Trump's comment on Monday suggesting that Pentagon leaders "want to do nothing but fight wars" so they can keep defense contractors happy.
"It's exactly the opposite," the Texas Republican said, adding that commanders are often the most reluctant to send troops into battle because they've seen the consequences up close. "Their motivation is to serve the country, and I don’t see how that can be questioned."
We got Trump because of Obama
Exactly and we got Obunghole because of W. I don’t want to think of what lies ahead in 2024
I have shown that you have lost your mind.
POLITICO
Senate Dems ready tactics to muck up Supreme Court confirmation
Here's how Democrats can make life hard for Mitch McConnell.
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer has his caucus on board with an effort to disrupt and obstruct Senate Republicans.
09/27/2020 06:44 AM EDT
_______
Senate Democrats can’t stop Mitch McConnell from confirming a new Supreme Court justice, but they are already planning to make it as painful as possible.
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) has his caucus on board with an effort to disrupt and obstruct Senate Republicans, using a wide range of procedural tools to try to make it difficult for the Senate majority leader.
Interviews with more than a dozen Democratic senators revealed broad support for disrupting the Supreme Court confirmation process, even if the strategy yields some collateral damage. Yet Democrats facing tough reelections and those who typically spurn delay tactics overwhelmingly support the hardball campaign, potentially putting them at increased risk of losing their seats.
“We know that the votes are not there [to block the nominee], but you do what you can to call attention to it,” said Sen. Doug Jones (D-Ala.), the most vulnerable Democratic incumbent who could be pulled off the campaign trail as a result. “The issue is that this is a power grab.”
“We can’t do business as usual in a situation that’s so extraordinary where the Republicans are breaking their word to rush a nominee so they can kill the Affordable Care Act,” added Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va.). “We can’t just say, oh, yeah, that’s normal. Sorry.”
The goal, senators and aides say, is to highlight what Democrats see as hypocrisy and a blatant abuse of power on the part of McConnell (R-Ky.), who blocked President Barack Obama’s Supreme Court nominee in 2016 but is pressing forward with the goal of confirming President Donald Trump’s pick, Amy Coney Barrett, before Election Day. McConnell only needs a simple majority after Republicans eliminated the filibuster for Supreme Court nominees in 2017. And if Democrats can prevent Barrett from being seated on the court before Nov. 10, she likely wouldn’t be able to rule on the Trump administration’s effort to invalidate Obamacare.
Reportedly.
Well if the media say it about Trump, it must be true.
Yeah ok.
Democratic senators were quick to justify the retaliation effort, which is only getting started with less than 40 days until the Nov. 3 election.
“Process is everything,” said Sen. Bob Menendez (D-N.J.). “So if you’re going to use the process to try to steal an election, then we’re going to use the process to try to do everything for that not to happen.”
Some Democrats have already said they will refuse to meet with Barrett, just as many Republicans snubbed Obama’s 2016 pick, Merrick Garland. But the party still plans to abide by some norms; Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee have decided to attend the confirmation hearings, despite calls from the left for a boycott.
Indeed, McConnell has told his members that they should be prepared for such tactics from Democrats, which could complicate campaign schedules for vulnerable GOP incumbents.
Here’s what Senate Democrats have in their toolkit:
Capt cut n paste rides again.
We got Trump because Hillary Clinton ran a very poor campaign.
Only 72,000 votes in 3 states gave him the electoral college victory.
The “two-hour rule”
Schumer’s opening salvo last Tuesday was to invoke the rarely used “two-hour rule,” which can be used to halt all committee business after the Senate has been in session for more than two hours.
The move caught senators and aides by surprise, and it caused the cancellation of several important committee hearings — most notably, a closed Senate Intelligence Committee briefing with William Evanina, the nation’s top counterintelligence official, on the subject of election security.
Republicans quickly derided the move as a “temper tantrum” on Schumer’s part. When Intelligence Committee Chairman Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) asked for consent that his panel hold its scheduled session with Evanina, Schumer objected.
“Because the Senate Republicans have no respect for the institution, we won’t have business as usual here in the Senate,” Schumer said on the Senate floor.
While the move made no difference for Republicans’ timeline to confirm a new Supreme Court justice, it was one of several ways Democrats could disrupt the chamber’s activity.
Perhaps most importantly, when the Judiciary Committee holds its series of confirmation hearings for Barrett in October, the sessions will almost certainly last more than two hours. Democrats could then invoke the two-hour rule to halt the hearing for the rest of the day.
Sure you did.
I doubt you are certain of today’s date
You’re like reading demented loon with an elevated opinion, for no reason, of himself
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2020/09/10/trumps-relations-military-further-strained-over-loser-remarks/5719981002/
Slowing down legislative business
The Senate can finish up its work on a bill or a nomination quickly with the agreement of all 100 senators. But that rarely happens, and McConnell and Schumer often spend their days haggling over floor time to reach a consent agreement.
On Thursday, Democrats refused to give consent for the Senate to quickly pass a government funding bill, requiring McConnell to file cloture and set up a final vote possibly for as late as Wednesday, just hours before the Sept. 30 deadline. The move also prevents senators up for reelection from campaigning while they tend to Senate business next week.
“Right now I think they're just trying to throw a wrench into anything we do,” Senate Majority Whip John Thune (R-S.D.) told reporters. “Obviously it's retribution for the decision on the court and they just want to be difficult. I don't know why. It doesn't make sense to me either to bring everybody back next week when we could finish this today.” TOO BAD, TOO BAD. I'M WEEPING.
Object to recess
When the Senate concludes its business for the day, it requires the consent of all 100 senators. Any one lawmaker can object to recessing.
Democrats could force the chamber to remain in session even when Republicans want to close up shop for the day or for a couple of weeks in October to allow vulnerable incumbents to head home and campaign for reelection in the final stretch before November. Still, even if the Senate doesn’t formally recess, individual senators could still leave Washington.
Deny a quorum
In order to conduct business, the Senate requires a quorum, or a majority of senators to be present. Any one senator can move to require a quorum call. If just a few Republicans are absent for any reason, Democrats could boycott the quorum call, effectively preventing the Senate from doing business.
“You have to be selective about it,” Kaine said
Points of order and motions to adjourn
Any senator can raise what is dubbed a “point of order” to ask the presiding officer a procedural question. If the senator disagrees with the presiding officer’s ruling, he or she can appeal it and trigger a roll-call vote, requiring senators to spend time voting on the objection. Democrats could theoretically do several of these in a row, which could stall proceedings for hours, even days.
They can also force a series of votes on motions to adjourn or to recess, further occupying valuable floor time and delaying the Senate’s business.
Get the House on board
There are a number of actions the Democrat-controlled House could take in order to force the Senate to take up unrelated business.
One of these is a War Powers Resolution, which, if passed by the House, can be put to the Senate floor even by Democrats, who are in the minority.
Some Democrats floated the highly unlikely possibility of impeaching the president or Attorney General William Barr, which would force the Senate to take up a trial. But the idea quickly fizzled — and Republicans could simply vote to dismiss the trial altogether.
Delay a final committee vote
After the Supreme Court nominee’s confirmation hearings in the Senate Judiciary Committee, any senator can move to delay the final committee vote by a week. That committee vote formally advances the nomination to the Senate floor.
Under the current timeline, even if the committee vote is pushed back by a week, the nomination could reach the Senate floor the week before the election. But the Senate could also vote for the nominee in the lame duck session.
But how far are Democrats willing to go?
It's Sunday September 27th and it's 78° in Santa Monica California!
Individual senators have been known to cause a procedural fracas here and there on the Senate floor — but if Schumer develops a cohesive strategy and has the support of the entire Senate Democratic Caucus, it could quickly become one of the most disruptive series of delay tactics in recent memory.
Even Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.), who voted to confirme Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh and is considered the most conservative Senate Democrat, is on board with Schumer’s initial effort. He was quick to justify Schumer’s use of the two-hour rule, which halted committee business last Tuesday.
“Hell, we don’t do anything around here anyway, we’ve got plenty of time to do meetings,” Manchin said. “They can reschedule.”
Moderate Democratic Sen. Jon Tester of Montana said he doesn’t plan to “second-guess” Schumer, in part because he views the alternative as the destruction of the Senate.
“I don’t know that the Senate will ever be what it once was. Mike Mansfield would be shaking his head today,” Tester said in an interview, referring to the longest-serving Senate majority leader. “There’s no sense of fair play, it’s all about power, it’s all about retention of power, it’s all about screwing people over.”
Other Democrats said the disrupt-and-obstruct strategy could prove useful as the party seeks to further highlight the Senate’s inaction on pandemic relief, which has stalled for weeks after negotiations broke down.
“We’re in the middle of a recession and a pandemic, and apparently he’s going to move heaven and earth to ram through a partisan nominee for the court, but there’s no time for us to resolve that?” Sen. Chris Coons (D-Del.), a Judiciary Committee member, said in an interview.
At the same time, some Democrats are warning that there should be some limits to the dilatory efforts, in particular when it comes to interfering with Senate activity that remains bipartisan, such as the Intelligence Committee briefing that was scrapped last week.
2008 dems had Whitehouse and super majorities in Congress. They lost all that because of Obama, not Hillary.
Anonymous Myballs said...
2008 dems had Whitehouse and super majorities in Congress. They lost all that because of Obama, not Hillary.
They don’t get it
conclusion of 1:30 should have been:
“You have to be selective about it,” Kaine said
https://www.aol.com/article/news/2020/09/27/poll-majorities-in-2-key-states-say-court-pick-should-wait-for-2020-winner/24631971/
watch the video
read the article
you're welcome
AOL ? Do you still have a dial up modem?
Anonymous Caliphate4vr said...
AOL ? Do you still have a dial up modem?
Are you as stupid as your post??????? BWAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!! Dr, Malcolm Kincaid.....big mouths go to source for medical information!
President Trump gives himself an A+ when asked about his score handling the pandemic. A couple hundred thousand people dead with an estimated couple hundred thousand more to die? That is an A+? I would give him a failing grade and not allow him to repeat the class if I was the teacher!
I can see why he got someone else to take his SAT!
I think I got 92
What is Supreme Court nominee Barret's relationship to the "Quverful movment"?
See "Quiverful" in Wikipedia.
And what is the Quiverful movement's relationship to "People of Praise," to which Barrett was previously a member and probably still is?
See "People of Praise" in Wikipedia.
Roger give us the total number of Dead in the USA at this time Last year and now.
Thank you.
I think I got 92
I’m truly not surprised
LMAO
I think getting a 400 qualifies as retarded
This week, Kentucky Attorney General Daniel Cameron made the bombshell announcement that the cops who fatally shot Breonna Taylor would not be charged with killing her, calling their use of force in the March raid “justified to protect themselves.”
In that justification, he said that one witness corroborated the three officers’ insistence that they knocked and identified themselves at Taylor’s Louisville home while executing a search warrant in connection with a narcotics investigation. It contradicted claims from Taylor’s boyfriend, Kenny Walker, and 11 other residents, who said they didn’t hear the cops announce themselves. Instead, Walker thought he was being burglarized and fired a warning shot that triggered a tragic chain of events.
But, according to documents and audio obtained by VICE News on Saturday, that sole witness initially told investigators days after the March 13 raid that he didn’t actually hear officers Brett Hankison, Jonathan Mattingly, and Myles Cosgrove announce themselves.
Big mouth of the south with another typically weak attempt at being a big man!!!!!!! BWAAAAAAPAAAAAA!!!!! Stupidity the cornerstone of GOP slurpers.....BWAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!
I just checked it up
I scored over 900
Mouth of the south at a tail gate party....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bh_WBmAMKWA
Blogger Roger Amick said...
I just checked it up
I scored over 900
That puts you into the bottom 25% category. Keep digging
The actual headline of the article the mouth of the south had a problem with Sure more credible than his whacko Dr Kincaid!!!!!!! What a dumb fuck he is!!!!!
Trumps first 100 days
Follow President Donald Trump as he shapes America’s future
Poll: Majorities in 2 key states say court pick should wait for 2020 winner
NBC News
MARK MURRAY
That puts you into the bottom 25% category.
Wow mouth of the south, you sure are a funny fellow especially for a loser salesman from Ga!!!!!v BWAAAAAAPAAAAAA!!!!
That puts you into the bottom 25% category. Keep digging
the dogma of stupidity lives loudly within him.
the dogma of stupidity lives loudly within him.
Saddest part is he bragged on getting a 92....
Let's go Rams!
I scored high enough to get into The South Dakota School of Mines & Technology.
Blogger Roger Amick said...
I scored high enough to get into The South Dakota School of Mines & Technology.
Doesn’t say much about that school
Evidently their requirement is to be able to fog a mirror
Look it up, it's one of the best technology and scientific colleges in the country.
No need to look it up, if they allow a 92 on the SAT’s it says everything
I can see why he got someone else to take his SAT!
I think I got 92
Seriously? I'm amazed you got a job as a carpenter.
I got a 700-750 myself and that was pretty damn average.
I screwed up everything at the college. I didn't work hard enough to pass the test, too often.
One day, one of the professors called me into his office. His name is on one of the buildings on the campus.
He told me that if I would actually study, he said that I could be in the top 10% of any college in the country.
I fucked up and I didn't listen to him.
I'm a technology geek. I tought myself how to use computers.
I can't go back in time, but I sure would!
I scored over 900
No need to look it up, if they allow a 92 on the SAT’s it says everything
He never took a SAT in his life. Roger is not even smart enough to fake it.
Roger Amick said...
I scored over 900
Stop digging.
Caliphate4vr said...
No need to look it up, if they allow a 92 on the SAT’s it says everything
Well he must have ended up with three degrees and at the top of his class after going to Delaware State instead on a scholarship for disadvantaged minorities.
Quite a success story.
Oops, an update:
I didn't work hard enough to pass the test, too often.
Speaks volumes
ROFLMFAO - WHY ISN'T THIS IN SUNDAY FUNNIES ???
The saddest part is he was bragging about a score of 92
He’s not well and hasn’t been for some time.
Blogger Roger Amick said...
I screwed up everything at the college. I didn't work hard enough to pass the test, too often.
Take the SAT too often???
Just shut up, you’re out of your league again. I took it once and know of no one that took it more than twice
Eat your jello, take some pills and go to bed
The tests I didn't use the plural of test.
I didn't work hard enough to pass the test, too often. , Alky
You wrote that.
Just shut up
Science is too difficult for Cali.
Quote From Dr. Fauci: (I love his closing line ��)
“Chickenpox is a virus. Lots of people have had it, and probably don't think about it much once the initial illness has passed. But it stays in your body and lives there forever, and maybe when you're older, you have debilitatingly painful outbreaks of shingles. You don't just get over this virus in a few weeks, never to have another health effect. We know this because it's been around for years, and has been studied medically for years.
Herpes is also a virus. And once someone has it, it stays in your body and lives there forever, and anytime they get a little run down or stressed-out they're going to have an outbreak. Maybe every time you have a big event coming up (school pictures, job interview, big date) you're going to get a cold sore. For the rest of your life. You don't just get over it in a few weeks. We know this because it's been around for years, and been studied medically for years.
HIV is a virus. It attacks the immune system and makes the carrier far more vulnerable to other illnesses. It has a list of symptoms and negative health impacts that goes on and on. It was decades before viable treatments were developed that allowed people to live with a reasonable quality of life. Once you have it, it lives in your body forever and there is no cure. Over time, that takes a toll on the body, putting people living with HIV at greater risk for health conditions such as cardiovascular disease, kidney disease, diabetes, bone disease, liver disease, cognitive disorders, and some types of cancer. We know this because it has been around for years, and had been studied medically for years.
Now with COVID-19, we have a novel virus that spreads rapidly and easily. The full spectrum of symptoms and health effects is only just beginning to be cataloged, much less understood.
So far the symptoms may include:
Fever
Fatigue
Coughing
Pneumonia
Chills/Trembling
Acute respiratory distress
Lung damage (potentially permanent)
Loss of taste (a neurological symptom)
Sore throat
Headaches
Difficulty breathing
Mental confusion
Diarrhea
Nausea or vomiting
Loss of appetite
Strokes have also been reported in some people who have COVID-19 (even in the relatively young)
Swollen eyes
Blood clots
Seizures
Liver damage
Kidney damage
Rash
COVID toes (weird, right?)
People testing positive for COVID-19 have been documented to be sick even after 60 days. Many people are sick for weeks, get better, and then experience a rapid and sudden flare up and get sick all over again. A man in Seattle was hospitalized for 62 days, and while well enough to be released, still has a long road of recovery ahead of him. Not to mention a $1.1 million medical bill.
Then there is MIS-C. Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children is a condition where different body parts can become inflamed, including the heart, lungs, kidneys, brain, skin, eyes, or gastrointestinal organs. Children with MIS-C may have a fever and various symptoms, including abdominal pain, vomiting, diarrhea, neck pain, rash, bloodshot eyes, or feeling extra tired. While rare, it has caused deaths.
This disease has not been around for years. It has basically been 6 months. No one knows yet the long-term health effects, or how it may present itself years down the road for people who have been exposed. We literally *do not know* what we do not know.
For those in our society who suggest that people being cautious are cowards, for people who refuse to take even the simplest of precautions to protect themselves and those around them, I want to ask, without hyperbole and in all sincerity:
How dare you?
How dare you risk the lives of others so cavalierly. How dare you decide for others that they should welcome exposure as "getting it over with", when literally no one knows who will be the lucky "mild symptoms" case, and who may fall ill and die. Because while we know that some people are more susceptible to suffering a more serious case, we also know that 20 and 30-year-olds have died, marathon runners and fitness nuts have died, children and infants have died.
How dare you behave as though you know more than medical experts, when those same experts acknowledge that there is so much we don't yet know, but with what we DO know, are smart enough to be scared of how easily this is spread, and recommend baseline precautions such as:
Frequent hand-washing
Physical distancing
Reduced social/public contact or interaction
Mask wearing
Covering your cough or sneeze
Avoiding touching your face
Sanitizing frequently touched surfaces
The more things we can all do to mitigate our risk of exposure, the better off we all are, in my opinion. Not only does it flatten the curve and allow health care providers to maintain levels of service that aren't immediately and catastrophically overwhelmed; it also reduces unnecessary suffering and deaths, and buys time for the scientific community to study the virus in order to come to a more full understanding of the breadth of its impacts in both the short and long term.
I reject the notion that it's "just a virus" and we'll all get it eventually. What a careless, lazy, heartless stance.”
Hey Alky, my SAT was was over 12.5 times your 92
Just shut up
I read that in a minute.
I took it in 1969.! You were a Sperm cell
And scored a 15 to 20 on the critical reading parT?
I was 7, oh ancient one
The Hill
Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden's lead over President Trump among likely voters in Minnesota is ticking up, according to a new poll, which shows the former vice president leading Trump by 6 points in the state as the November race inches closer.
You keep saying that Minnesota is a Trump state
In 7th grade I was reading about 750 wpm and my vocabulary was at a college level.
My mother Marjorie read books and I started reading them by 5th grade or earlier
My mother Marjorie read books and I started reading them by 5th grade or earlier
Wow, and the sad part is he thinks this is worthy of bragging.
Unbelievable
I had read all of, Sir Arthur Ignatius Conan Doyle, Sherlock Holmes’ by 3rd
JUST IN TIME FOR THE FIRST DEBATE
Trump’s Tax Returns Leaked
September 27, 2020 at 5:21 pm EDT By Taegan Goddard
The New York Times obtained President Trump’s tax information “extending over more than two decades, revealing struggling properties, vast write-offs, an audit battle and hundreds of millions in debt coming due.”
Key takeaway:
“He had paid no income taxes at all in 10 of the previous 15 years — largely because he reported losing much more money than he made.”
“As the president wages a re-election campaign that polls say he is in danger of losing, his finances are under stress, beset by losses and hundreds of millions of dollars in debt coming due that he has personally guaranteed. Also hanging over him is a decade-long audit battle with the Internal Revenue Service over the legitimacy of a $72.9 million tax refund that he claimed, and received, after declaring huge losses. An adverse ruling could cost him more than $100 million.
“The tax returns that Mr. Trump has long fought to keep private tell a story fundamentally different from the one he has sold to the American public. His reports to the I.R.S. portray a businessman who takes in hundreds of millions of dollars a year yet racks up chronic losses that he aggressively employs to avoid paying taxes. Now, with his financial challenges mounting, the records show that he depends more and more on making money from businesses that put him in potential and often direct conflict of interest with his job as president.”
President Trump paid no income taxes for 10 of the 15 years before he was elected president, with his income tax payments in 2016 and 2017 amounting to just $750, according to The New York Times, which obtained the president's tax information for the last 20 years.
The Times found Trump faces hundreds of millions in debt, struggling Trump Organization properties and a number of write-offs to avoid paying taxes.
In a statement to The Times, Trump Organization lawyer Alan Garten said "most, if not all, of the facts appear to be inaccurate" and reportedly took issue with the amount of taxes Trump has paid.
"Over the past decade, President Trump has paid tens of millions of dollars in personal taxes to the federal government, including paying millions in personal taxes since announcing his candidacy in 2015," Garten told the Times.
I had read all of Shakespeare by the time I
was 4 1/2.
But that's not as important as getting to read Trump's tax returns.
Donald J. Trump paid $750 in federal income taxes the year he won the presidency. In his first year in the White House, he paid another $750.
He had paid no income taxes at all in 10 of the previous 15 years — largely because he reported losing much more money than he made.
As the president wages a re-election campaign that polls say he is in danger of losing, his finances are under stress, beset by losses and hundreds of millions of dollars in debt coming due that he has personally guaranteed. Also hanging over him is a decade-long audit battle with the Internal Revenue Service over the legitimacy of a $72.9 million tax refund that he claimed, and received, after declaring huge losses. An adverse ruling could cost him more than $100 million.
The tax returns that Mr. Trump has long fought to keep private tell a story fundamentally different from the one he has sold to the American public. His reports to the I.R.S. portray a businessman who takes in hundreds of millions of dollars a year yet racks up chronic losses that he aggressively employs to avoid paying taxes. Now, with his financial challenges mounting, the records show that he depends more and more on making money from businesses that put him in potential and often direct conflict of interest with his job as president.
The New York Times has obtained tax-return data extending over more than two decades for Mr. Trump and the hundreds of companies that make up his business organization, including detailed information from his first two years in office. It does not include his personal returns for 2018 or 2019. This article offers an overview of The Times’s findings; additional articles will be published in the coming weeks.
The returns are some of the most sought-after, and speculated-about, records in recent memory. In Mr. Trump’s nearly four years in office — and across his endlessly hyped decades in the public eye — journalists, prosecutors, opposition politicians and conspiracists have, with limited success, sought to excavate the enigmas of his finances. By their very nature, the filings will leave many questions unanswered, many questioners unfulfilled. They comprise information that Mr. Trump has disclosed to the I.R.S., not the findings of an independent financial examination. They report that Mr. Trump owns hundreds of millions of dollars in valuable assets, but they do not reveal his true wealth. Nor do they reveal any previously unreported connections to Russia.
Just in time for the first debate.
You better bet Trump is right now bouncing off the walls.
Heads wold now roll, if he had that power. But Kingship has not yet been conferred, and will not be.
“As the president wages a re-election campaign that polls say he is in danger of losing, his finances are under stress, beset by losses and hundreds of millions of dollars in debt coming due that he has personally guaranteed. Also hanging over him is a decade-long audit battle with the Internal Revenue Service over the legitimacy of a $72.9 million tax refund that he claimed, and received, after declaring huge losses. An adverse ruling could cost him more than $100 million.
The tax returns that Mr. Trump has long fought to keep private tell a story fundamentally different from the one he has sold to the American public. His reports to the I.R.S. portray a businessman who takes in hundreds of millions of dollars a year yet racks up chronic losses that he aggressively employs to avoid paying taxes. Now, with his financial challenges mounting, the records show that he depends more and more on making money from businesses that put him in potential and often direct conflict of interest with his job as president.”
*would
Trump is grieving. "This will prevent the Republicans from declaring me king."
The Republicans are grieving too.
LOL
Just to be clear:
The quote above is not what Trump actually is saying; only what I think he is thinking.
I paid more in taxes than this "billionaire."
Trump didn't pay income tax for 10 of 15 years before 2016 election:
NYT 9/27/20 05:28 PM EDT
Just In...
President Trump paid no income taxes for 10 of the 15 years before he was elected president, with his income tax payments in 2016 and 2017 amounting to just $750, according to The New York Times, which obtained the president's tax information for the last 20 years.
The Times found Trump faces hundreds of millions in debt, struggling Trump Organization properties and a number of write-offs to avoid paying taxes.
_________
WOW. If true, I paid more in taxes than this "billionaire" did!
And yet I get criticized for saying the wealthy, and especially the "filthy" wealthy, do not pay their fair share of the tax burden?
With roger getting a 92 on his SAT, I’d bet the pederast was single digit territory
Caliphate4vrSeptember 27, 2020 at 2:21 PM
the dogma of stupidity lives loudly within him.
Saddest part is he bragged on getting a 92...." Cali
Clubbing sponge sucker Roger , yet again.
LOL Who gives a rat's ass.
Trump's TAX RETURNS HAVE BEEN LEAKED!!!!!
I have never heard of scoring a "93" on an SAT.
Blogger James said...
LOL Who gives a rat's ass.
Trump's TAX RETURNS HAVE BEEN LEAKED!!!!!
Supposedly pederast, you come on here breathlessly every other week with his returns and how many felonies have been committed
Idiot
You aren’t bright
“The tax returns that Mr. Trump has long fought to keep private tell a story fundamentally different from the one he has sold to the American public. His reports to the I.R.S. portray a businessman who takes in hundreds of millions of dollars a year yet racks up chronic losses that he aggressively employs to avoid paying taxes. Now, with his financial challenges mounting, the records show that he depends more and more on making money from businesses that put him in potential and often direct conflict of interest with his job as president.”
Same story the Times published in 2016.
The Stupid Hate Filled Three Stooges get hoodwinked , again.
He insisted the report was "fake news" and "made up," but again falsely claimed he could not provide his tax returns because of an audit.
Scott A**hole and the truthers would agree with him
No it's not the same damn thing, dumbshit
Hey NY Times, tell us how many tens of millions he paid those other years. We already know in 2003 he paid $38M.
His properties have become bazaars for collecting money directly from lobbyists, foreign officials and others seeking face time, access or favor; the records for the first time put precise dollar figures on those transactions.
What is the emoluments clause?
The Constitution includes a few provisions that are sometimes described as “emoluments” clauses. One such provision, sometimes referred to as the “foreign emoluments clause,” provides that “no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under [the United States], shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State.”
President Trump paid no income taxes for 10 of the 15 years before he was elected president, with his income tax payments in 2016 and 2017 amounting to just $750, according to The New York Times, which obtained the president's tax information for the last 20 years.
Post a Comment