Not a good time for this sort of video to come out - but one has to wonder why and how it has been hidden from public view?
Georgia Democrat Raphael Warnock's ex-wife on his character after he allegedly ran over her foot with his car:
— Steve Guest (@SteveGuest) December 23, 2020
"I've tried to keep the way he acts under wraps for a long time, & today he crossed the line... He is a great actor. He is phenomenal at putting on a really good show." pic.twitter.com/0SuLy1IPub
Divorce is never easy and it would appear that Senate candidates and Reverends who get divorced are no different. In reading the full story, the issue would appear to be whether or not Ndoye should be allowed to take the children to West Africa for a family funeral. It sounds like Warnock was not willing to sign the paperwork that would have provided the children with passports to go.
Whether or not he actually did or didn't run over her foot seems relevant, but not necessarily the entire story. Carlson states that the woman in the video is believable, whereas the news report suggests that it didn't happen. We don't know what the truth is (and certainly liberal politicians have a way of getting away with the media pumping a lie for them). The fact that this video was kept out of the public eye until now, seems to reinforce that image of Democrats getting every benefit of the doubt. Has this been a video of Perdue or something similar of Loeffler, then we likely would have seen everyone carry it (not just Tucker Carlson).
The question to me, as a father and divorcee is whether or not the children would be allowed to travel to a family funeral or whether this sort of request is wrong. I suspect that if Warnock and Ndoye were still married that traveling to West Africa for a funeral would not have been at issue. Perhaps the whole family would have gone. So the question falls into that area of whether or not these children are being used as pawns within what is obviously a broken marriage and heated divorce. That is something I take issue with and I believe it reveals something serious about Warnock's character.
17 comments:
would have went.
would have gone.
Both of the people in the video seem "believable" to me.
I'm glad to see that Fox was "objective" enough to allow Warnock to speak as well.
More important:
Why Did Bill Barr Agree to Leave Today?
9:57 am EST
Bill Kristol:
“It could, obviously, be kind of random–a date picked last week to allow Barr to get things in order, an accommodation of Barr’s family schedule, etc. But it could also be that Barr very much wanted to get out before Dec. 24, and/or that Trump wanted him out by then.
“One obvious possibility discussed in the White House:
Trump has spoken about a bunch of pardons on Christmas Eve.
Some of the names may have been too much for Barr — so they agreed on his departure on Dec. 23. (Or the pardons will be a few days later, but the principle holds — Barr wanted out, or Trump wanted him out, first.)
“But it could be more than pardons.
Yesterday Barr suggested there were several things he wouldn’t do that Trump wanted him to do as ranging from
appointing special counsels for Hunter Biden
or election fraud,
to giving a legal OK for seizing voting machines
or for various types of Insurrection Act-type moves by the president.
Can one be confident Barr’s successor as AG, Jeffrey Rosen, will also say no?”
More from Kristol:
“I’m also reliably told that senior military officials in the Pentagon are more, not less, alarmed than they were a few weeks ago when Mark Esper was fired.
The new crew of Trump loyalists in the most senior civilian positions don’t seem there only to burnish their resumes, as one person put it.
They’re trying to figure out, in coordination with people in the White House, ‘how to make things happen.'”
_______________
Military officials are NOT going to participate in a Trump-induced coup attempt!
As sane Americans reluctantly resign themselves to the approach of an unimaginable Joe Biden presidency, the unrelenting blitzkrieg of media Trump-hate is occasionally, but each week more frequently, punctured by glimmers of recognition of what the apparently outgoing president has achieved. There seems to be a consensus, even embracing many Democrats, that President Trump has scored a significant success with the Abraham Accords in the Middle East.
This subject is a perfect illustration of the total failure of Barack Obama’s foreign policy, which Mr. Biden proudly embraces, and the corresponding success that President Trump enjoyed in pursuing the exact opposite course. President Obama inexplicably concluded that the best policy for the United States to pursue in the Middle East was to request that the principal countries simply change roles.
The ayatollahs in Tehran would magically become friends of the United States because the Peter Pan in the White House wished it so. Israel, America’s principal friend in the region and one of the sturdiest allies in the world, could simply repair to the doghouse for obstinately insisting on its right to persevere as it was set up by the United Nations originally, including the unanimous permanent founding members of the Security Council, as a Jewish state.
Why no comments on the 3 crooked congressmen with R's in their name were pardoned by trump???? Looks every bit a partisan pardon of friends of trump.....so sad that Lil Schitty thinks marital strife of a D candidate is worthy of a column while trump grabbing pussy and fucking hookers does not....Where is the justice?????????BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!
Unless the Republicans go along with the Democrats and pass an extension of the $2,000 stimulus checks, they will probably lose Georgia and the majority.
QUESTION:
How can Israel remain
a state that is both
Jewish and democratic?
ANSWER:
Only by entering into
a two state arrangement
with the Palestinians.
Roger: "Unless the Republicans go along with the Democrats and pass an extension of the $2,000 stimulus checks, they will probably lose Georgia and the majority."
________
How nice. Thanks, Donald!
Alky, the $2,000 amount came from Pres. Trump.
Bitch Nancy had it at nada, then $600
, barely enough to buy a good pair of earrings.
The lame duck President pardoned the people who killed a 9 year old boy, by shooting him in the head and killed a dozen more civilians.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=tBkMWcwJ3C0&feature=share
Warning, it's very disturbing
The Heroes act, containing the $2,000 checks.
Moscow Mitch McConnell never let it off his desk kputz
i can see why you're such a Warnock fan alky.
he's a spousal abuser too.
I NEVER THOUGHT EVEN TRUMP COULD ACT LIKE THIS BIG AN IDIOT.
Ignore
Ignore
Ignore
The lame duck President pardoned the people who killed a 9 year old boy, by shooting him in the head and killed a dozen more civilians.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=tBkMWcwJ3C0&feature=share
Warning, it's very disturbing
not as disturbing as the lie you're parroting, Lydia-beater.
These veterans were working in Iraq in 2007 as security contractors responsible for securing the safety of United States personnel. When the convoy attempted to establish a blockade outside the “Green Zone,” the situation turned violent, which resulted in the unfortunate deaths and injuries of Iraqi civilians. Initial charges against the men were dismissed, but they were eventually tried and convicted on charges ranging from first degree murder to voluntary manslaughter.
On appeal, the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that additional evidence should have been presented at Mr. Slatten’s trial. Further, prosecutors recently disclosed—more than 10 years after the incident—that the lead Iraqi investigator, whom prosecutors relied heavily upon to verify that there were no insurgent victims and to collect evidence, may have had ties to insurgent groups himself.
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/12/22/donald-trump-pardons-fifteen-americans-including-george-papadopoulos/
so once again you align yourself with insurgent terrorists AND you beat Lydia like it was your fucking job.
AOC and Pelosi push to take up President Trump on his offer for $2,000 stimulus checks
Yahoo Money
December 23, 2020, 11:56 AM
After President Trump signaled he may not sign the $900 billion stimulus deal and demanded larger stimulus checks, key Democrats are getting ready to put his idea up for a vote on Thursday.
“Mr. President, sign the bill to keep government open! Urge McConnell and McCarthy to agree with the Democratic unanimous consent request for $2,000 direct payments!” House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) said in a tweet on Wednesday morning. “This can be done by noon on Christmas Eve!”
Pelosi was quick to respond to the president’s demand, saying “at last, the President has agreed to $2,000” on Tuesday evening. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) joined in, too, saying they already had the provision the president demands in a bill, co-written by Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-MI), and it’s “ready to go.”
“Glad to see the President is willing to support our legislation,” Ocasio-Cortez said in a tweet on Tuesday evening. “We can pass $2k checks this week if the Senate GOP agrees to stand down.”
Post a Comment