This thread is itself "a little" racist. It does not bring out the fact that there are many white people, elderly, low income, etc., as well as black people who have no access to the internet and have some difficulty coming up with ID, a fact hits blacks harder simply because the poverty levels are higher among them.
When COVID-19 vaccinations began, U.S. health officials encouraged vaccinated Americans to continue wearing masks in public because scientists were still unsure if they could carry the virus that causes the disease after being inoculated.
Recent results from real-world studies show the COVID-19 vaccines protect against asymptomatic infection, suggesting they also drastically reduce virus transmission.
But health experts still recommend wearing masks in public because, just like the liberal Democrat demanding that the voice of the white people doesn't mean to them.
As a white liberal, we understand that you feel it is your prerogative to speak for the black community. But apparently the black community actually thinks you are ignorant for doing so.
But keep it up, non-the-less. No self reflection necessary. Just go on believing that you know better than black people what is good for them.
?????? "But health experts still recommend wearing masks in public because, just like the liberal Democrat demanding that the voice of the white people doesn't mean to them." ??????
"Truthseeker" needs more practice writing English.
Run my statement past black people and see what they say.
Needing some practice writing better English myself, I have added one word to it in CAPS. ______
"This thread is itself "a little" racist. It does not bring out the fact that there are many white people, elderly, low income, etc., as well as black people who have no access to the internet and have some difficulty coming up with ID, a fact THAT hits blacks harder simply because the poverty levels are higher among them."
LOL, it also occurs to me that there are blacks who are far better than I am at using "smart" phone technology, etc., etc., etc. (This white old geezer is not as up to date on all that as they are.)
In the 2010 midterm election, voters from all over the place gave President Obama what he himself called “a shellacking.” And oh boy, was it ever. You could be a total moron and get elected just by having an R next to your name—and that year, by the way, we did pick up a fair number in that category.
Retaking control of the House of Representatives put me in line to be the next Speaker of the House over the largest freshman Republican class in history: 87 newly elected members of the GOP. Since I was presiding over a large group of people who’d never sat in Congress, I felt I owed them a little tutorial on governing. I had to explain how to actually get things done. A lot of that went straight through the ears of most of them, especially the ones who didn’t have brains that got in the way.
It does not bring out the fact that there are many white people, elderly, low income, etc., as well as black people who have no access to the internet and have some difficulty coming up with I
Well first, the video didn't bring that up at all. In fact it provided no evidence of anyone who have issues getting voter ID.
Secondly, the video did specifically ask black people about the idea that voter ID laws were racist and they believe that concept to be racist.
I get the feeling that cognitive dissonance would not allow you to actually watch the video straight through.
But lastly Reverend. If the issue really is about the "poor" and not specifically about race, then why is the rhetoric, the narrative, and attempts to change the voter laws focused on race rather than economics?
White supremacy or white supremacism is the belief that white people are superior to those of other races and thus should dominate them. The belief favors the maintenance and defense of white power and privilege. White supremacy has roots in the discredited doctrine of scientific racism.
You were born with superior genetics.
The same people used to believe that the earth is flat.
The Republicans of this era have returned to the 12th century. They were born to rule the entire world.
Richard Grenell https://twitter.com/RichardGrenell/status/1378141011512160259 Everyone must speak out - showing your ID is not racist but an essential part of public safety.
The public is overwhelmingly with us. Overwhelmingly. Only the DC media mob and radical Democrats are against it.
Hi Roger, hope your morning is going well. I see you hatched more monikers.
The Fact that American Greatness is real and Capitalism as practiced in the USA is a roaring success does not change because you are a unmitigated disaster of a dumpster fire.
70-75% of Americans are in favor of a Federal Voter ID law depending on the poll.
That would put us in line with ever other first world Democracy on earth other than Russia (who is the only other Democracy that allows people to vote incognito).
Only the 2021 American liberal would be so self-absorbed and high and mighty to believe that the rest of the world and three quarters of America are all racist because they don't agree with them.
But let's be clear. Nobody really believes Voter ID laws are racist or that minorities would not be able to vote. This is 100% about the fact that Voter ID laws cut down on voter fraud and Liberals are scared shitless that without fraud, they would never win.
In the 2020 election is that we saw the highest turnout in any election since 1900 — in part because of expanded access to mail ballots. Current projections suggest about two-thirds of eligible voters cast ballots, which would beat every election since 1900, when more than 7 in 10 eligible American voters cast ballots, according to numbers from the United States Election Project. The outcome is thus more reflective of the actual will of the American people.
The legislation in Georgia is designed to make it much more difficult to vote by mail. The Republicans claimed that the Democratic candidates won because a lot of them were invalid, despite the fact there was no evidence of mail fraud.
The margins were so small, that making it more difficult to vote by mail, so they can win, despite the voice of the people is the foundation of our democratic Republic.
I'm getting sick and tired of your Alex Jones philosophy. From day one when you said that a deep state organization was been trying to destroy the Orange Monster.
Rep. Jeff Duncan https://mobile.twitter.com/RepJeffDuncan/status/1378074529076015106
In light of @MLB's stance to undermine election integrity laws, I have instructed my staff to begin drafting legislation to remove Major League Baseball's federal antitrust exception.
We had the most secure election in history ,and you keep saying the it was fraudulent.
Keeping a few thousand Democrats voters from voting will get Republicans elected despite the voice of the people is the foundation of our Republic asshole Alex Jones on steroids asshole
We in Kansas have had required ID to vote for years.
Acceptable Forms of Photo ID
Driver’s license or ID card issued by Kansas or another stateU.S. PassportU.S. Military IDID card issued by a Native American tribeEmployee badge or ID issued by a government officeStudent ID card from an accredited postsecondary education institution in KansasConcealed carry license issued by Kansas or another statePublic assistance ID card issued by a government office
Kansas pays for an ID if your ass is too broke to buy one.
But let's be clear. Nobody really believes Voter ID laws are racist or that minorities would not be able to vote. This is 100% about the fact that Voter ID laws cut down on voter fraud and Liberals are scared shitless that without fraud, they would never win.
Whatever the DNC talking point is the MSM "news" activists compliantly put out and their followers regurgitate.
You can see it all day here with the Bezo's Washington Post, NYT and CNN etc.
to liberals the end justifies the means and everything is OK to get to that end.
PeKing James https://twitter.com/pekingjames/status/1378121133569015810
Thank you @MLB for following the lead of my dear friend President Xi and supporting everyone’s right to vote! My great and magnanimous Leader even allowed the Uighurs the freedom to vote themselves into slavery.
Major League Baseball operates a player Development Center in Communist China while relocating their All-Star Game from Atlanta, Georgia, merely because Georgia’s residents must use an ID to vote due to a newly passed state law.
Roger Amick said... The margins were so small, that making it more difficult to vote by mail, so they can win, despite the voice of the people is the foundation of our democratic Republic.
The margins were so small, that making it easy for a little fraud to occur so they can win, despite the voice of the people is the foundation of our democratic Republic.
Scott, I have been thinking about this. Nate Cohen said that the Republicans might trigger anger at the ballot box.
If the Democrats, like they did last year, get out the vote!
A final reason is that voting restrictions may backfire by angering and energizing Democratic voters. This law’s restrictions on handing out water in line, for instance, may do more to mobilize Democrats than to stop them from voting. One recent study even theorized that the Supreme Court’s decision to roll back elements of the Voting Rights Act didn’t reduce Black turnout because subsequent efforts to restrict voting were swiftly countered by efforts to mobilize Black voters.
That doesn’t mean the Georgia law or other such laws are without consequence. Many make voting more difficult, enough to intimidate or discourage some voters. Many outright disenfranchise voters, even if only in small numbers. Perhaps the disenfranchisement of even a single voter merits outrage and opposition, especially if the law is passed on dubious or even fabricated grounds, and with Jim Crow mass disenfranchisement as a historical backdrop.
But setting aside intent, it does mean that many such voting provisions, like that in Georgia, are unlikely to have a huge effect on turnout or Democratic
There are consequences to misunderstanding the stakes of changing voting laws. Minor changes in voting access can overshadow larger issues, including the kinds of potentially significant provisions in the Georgia law that empower the State Legislature. The democracy reform bill H.R. 1, for instance, would do quite a bit to expand voting access but relatively little to protect against partisan interference in election administration.
The perception that voting laws have existential stakes for democracy or the political viability of the two parties has made bipartisan compromise extremely difficult. The virtue of bipartisanship is often and understandably dismissed as naïve, but voting laws are a rare case where bipartisanship has value of its own. Democracy, after all, depends on the consent of the loser.
If you had watched the MSM instead of reading Infowars you would have seen the efforts to get out the vote.
Of course there was fraud. It was reported all over the place. Dozens if not hundreds were arrested after the last election and many have already been convicted. At least two cases involved potential fraud of thousands of mail in ballots.
Not only that but court rulings in three different battleground state have ruled (after the fact) that Governor executive orders were illegal and should not have been followed and will not be followed in the future.
The argument (your argument and the argument of your ilk) was that there was not enough fraud found that it would alter the election.
Or have you already forgotten your own argument, Roger?
I ask you a simple question regarding hypocrisy.
Advocates for more secure elections have proven over and over and over that people who should not vote are voting. That people are voting multiple times. They have proven over and over that voter fraud exists and their are criminal conviction to back it up.
But whenever someone asks to show evidence of someone, anyone, one particular real life person who is actually perfectly capable of figuring out how to either go to vote or get a ballot absentee and send it in... but somehow incapable of securing a free ID, you come up short every single time.
Why do we always demand to see more and more proof of fraud, while discounting any and all fraud found as to be not enough to worry abot.
But you demand that no proof is necessary to find any actual examples of people who would not be able to vote because of a Voter ID law.
Because those ID laws work everywhere else on the planet earth just fine.
SCOTTIE/CH SAYS But let's be clear. Nobody really believes Voter ID laws are racist or that minorities would not be able to vote. This is 100% about the fact that Voter ID laws cut down on voter fraud and Liberals are scared shitless that without fraud, they would never win.
We just won a major election WITHOUT FRAUD to the tune of some seven million votes.
If Trump supporters didn't storm the Capitol on January 6th, yesterday's attack would have never happened. Trump is responsible. Republicans are responsible.
MY STATEMENT AND THEN MY COMMENTS IN CAPS: JAMES SAID: It [THE VIDEO] does not bring out the fact that there are many white people, elderly, low income, etc., as well as black people who have no access to the internet and have some difficulty coming up with I [THE REST OF THE STATEMENT IS CUT OFF]
Well first, the video didn't bring that up at all. I SAID THAT IT DID NOT BRING THAT UP. In fact it provided no evidence of anyone who have issues getting voter ID. THAT DOES NOT MEAN THERE ARE NO SUCH ISSUES AMONG BOTH WHITES AND BLACKS WHO DO NOT HAVE ACCESS TO COMPUTERS OR WHO DO NOT DRIVE, ETC.
Secondly, the video did specifically ask black people about the idea that voter ID laws were racist and they believe that concept to be racist.
I get the feeling that cognitive dissonance would not allow you to actually watch the video straight through. I WATCHED THE ENTIRE VIDEO, FROM BEGINNING TO END.
But lastly Reverend. If the issue really is about the "poor" and not specifically about race, then why is the rhetoric, the narrative, and attempts to change the voter laws focused on race rather than economics?
YOU ARE NOT REALLY TOO STUPID TO KNOW THAT IF YOU CAN REDUCE THE NUMBER OF VOTES OF THOSE WHO ARE AMONG THE MORE DISADVANTAGED, THAT WILL SIGNIFICANTLY REDUCE THE BLACK VOTE, WHICH IS LARGELY DEMOCRATIC, AND THAT IS THE REAL PURPOSE OF THESE LAWS, AS SOME GOP LAWMAKERS HAVE OPENLY ADMITTED.
William Barr There was not enough evidence of fraud to have changed the outcome of this election.
But let's be clear. Nobody really believes Voter ID laws are racist or that minorities would not be able to vote. This is 100% about the fact that Voter ID laws cut down on voter fraud and Liberals are scared shitless that without fraud, they would never win.
The only person in this room believes that this election was effected by fraudulent ballots is guess who?
Andy Ngô https://mobile.twitter.com/MrAndyNgo/status/1378111027519324160
The man responsible for the deadly Good Friday Capitol Hill attack was a devout follower of Louis Farrakhan & the black nationalist Nation of Islam group. Farrakhan has close ties to Democrat leaders. Will the media make sure they’re made to answer for those links?
Of course not
Just like the violent BLM rioters preceding the Capitol Hill protest rarely were fully prosecuted.
James, he will never admit Thecoldheartedtruth, because he is a narcissist pathological person without empathy.
YOU ARE NOT REALLY TOO STUPID TO KNOW THAT IF YOU CAN REDUCE THE NUMBER OF VOTES OF THOSE WHO ARE AMONG THE MORE DISADVANTAGED, THAT WILL SIGNIFICANTLY REDUCE THE BLACK VOTE, WHICH IS LARGELY DEMOCRATIC, AND THAT IS THE REAL PURPOSE OF THESE LAWS, AS SOME GOP LAWMAKERS HAVE OPENLY ADMITTED.
Zaid Jilani https://twitter.com/ZaidJilani/status/1378123041146802177 The Braves oppose the MLB's move because well, so does Jon Ossoff, Lisa Cupid, Stacey Abrams, and basically everyone in Georgia. Who the heck advocates for boycotting their own state? It's not a conspiracy.
I WATCHED THE ENTIRE VIDEO, FROM BEGINNING TO END.
Then obviously you didn't understand the point.
YOU ARE NOT REALLY TOO STUPID TO KNOW THAT IF YOU CAN REDUCE THE NUMBER OF VOTES OF THOSE WHO ARE AMONG THE MORE DISADVANTAGED, THAT WILL SIGNIFICANTLY REDUCE THE BLACK VOTE, WHICH IS LARGELY DEMOCRATIC, AND THAT IS THE REAL PURPOSE OF THESE LAWS, AS SOME GOP LAWMAKERS HAVE OPENLY ADMITTED.
Well all caps, huh, Reverend? Must be serious!
Problem being... nobody on your side has produced even one example of a single person who is otherwise capable of figuring out either the process of voting in person or voting via mail... who is not capable of getting an ID.
This is why all of the legal challenges to Voter ID laws end up failing. They cannot find any valid people with legal standing to say they are otherwise incapable of getting an ID.
The entire argument against Voter ID is assumptive. It assumes what is not proven or even plausible. Because voter ID laws work in every other country in the world.
Unless you are arguing (as a white liberal who loves to demean minorities) that our minority population is not a smart and capable as minorities in other countries?
How Trump Fleeced His Own Supporters `:20 pm EDT By Taegan Goddard politicalwire.com New York Times: “Facing a cash crunch and getting badly outspent by the Democrats, the campaign had begun last September to set up recurring donations by default for online donors, for every week until the election. Contributors had to wade through a fine-print disclaimer and manually uncheck a box to opt out.
“As the election neared, the Trump team made that disclaimer increasingly opaque, an investigation by The New York Times showed. It introduced a second prechecked box, known internally as a ‘money bomb,’ that doubled a person’s contribution. Eventually its solicitations featured lines of text in bold and capital letters that overwhelmed the opt-out language.
“The tactic ensnared scores of unsuspecting Trump loyalists — retirees, military veterans, nurses and even experienced political operatives. Soon, banks and credit card companies were inundated with fraud complaints from the president’s own supporters about donations they had not intended to make, sometimes for thousands of dollars."
RE WHAT A BASTARD: How Trump Steered Supporters Into Unwitting Donations Online donors were guided into weekly recurring contributions. Demands for refunds spiked. Complaints to banks and credit card companies soared. But the money helped keep Donald Trump’s struggling campaign afloat. _____________ Stacy Blatt was in hospice care last September listening to Rush Limbaugh’s dire warnings about how badly Donald J. Trump’s campaign needed money when he went online and chipped in everything he could: $500.
It was a big sum for a 63-year-old battling cancer and living in Kansas City on less than $1,000 per month. But that single contribution — federal records show it was his first ever — quickly multiplied. Another $500 was withdrawn the next day, then $500 the next week and every week through mid-October, without his knowledge — until Mr. Blatt’s bank account had been depleted and frozen. When his utility and rent payments bounced, he called his brother, Russell, for help.
What the Blatts soon discovered was $3,000 in withdrawals by the Trump campaign in less than 30 days. They called their bank and said they thought they were victims of fraud.
“It felt,” Russell said, “like it was a scam.”
But what the Blatts believed was duplicity was actually an intentional scheme to boost revenues by the Trump campaign and the for-profit company that processed its online donations, WinRed. Facing a cash crunch and getting badly outspent by the Democrats, the campaign had begun last September to set up recurring donations by default for online donors, for every week until the election.
Contributors had to wade through a fine-print disclaimer and manually uncheck a box to opt out.
As the election neared, the Trump team made that disclaimer increasingly opaque, an investigation by The New York Times showed. It introduced a second prechecked box, known internally as a “money bomb,” that doubled a person’s contribution. Eventually its solicitations featured lines of text in bold and capital letters that overwhelmed the opt-out language.
The tactic ensnared scores of unsuspecting Trump loyalists — retirees, military veterans, nurses and even experienced political operatives. Soon, banks and credit card companies were inundated with fraud complaints from the president’s own supporters about donations they had not intended to make, sometimes for thousands of dollars.
“Bandits!” said Victor Amelino, a 78-year-old Californian, who made a $990 online donation to Mr. Trump in early September via WinRed. It recurred seven more times — adding up to almost $8,000. “I’m retired. I can’t afford to pay all that damn money.”
The sheer magnitude of the money involved is staggering for politics. In the final two and a half months of 2020, the Trump campaign, the Republican National Committee and their shared accounts issued more than 530,000 refunds worth $64.3 million to online donors. All campaigns make refunds for various reasons, including to people who give more than the legal limit. But the sum the Trump operation refunded dwarfed that of Joseph R. Biden Jr.’s campaign and his equivalent Democratic committees, which made 37,000 online refunds totaling $5.6 million in that time.
The recurring donations swelled Mr. Trump’s treasury in September and October, just as his finances were deteriorating. He was then able to use tens of millions of dollars he raised after the election, under the guise of fighting his unfounded fraud claims, to help cover the refunds he owed.
WHAT A REAL, GENUINE BASTARD!
THE ARTICLE CONTINUES. GO TO POLITICALWIRE.COM AND CLICK ON THE BLUE LINK FOR THE ENTIRE FIASCO.
54 comments:
There is nothing on this earth more racist, more anti-Semitic, or more hateful than a white American liberal.
Nothing.
This thread is itself "a little" racist.
It does not bring out the fact that there are many white people, elderly, low income, etc., as well as black people who have no access to the internet and have some difficulty coming up with ID, a fact hits blacks harder simply because the poverty levels are higher among them.
LOL
My Jewish friends do not think I am anti-Semitic for being liberal which, by the way, they are too.
When COVID-19 vaccinations began, U.S. health officials encouraged vaccinated Americans to continue wearing masks in public because scientists were still unsure if they could carry the virus that causes the disease after being inoculated.
Recent results from real-world studies show the COVID-19 vaccines protect against asymptomatic infection, suggesting they also drastically reduce virus transmission.
But health experts still recommend wearing masks in public because, just like the liberal Democrat demanding that the voice of the white people doesn't mean to them.
Sure Reverend...
As a white liberal, we understand that you feel it is your prerogative to speak for the black community. But apparently the black community actually thinks you are ignorant for doing so.
But keep it up, non-the-less. No self reflection necessary. Just go on believing that you know better than black people what is good for them.
??????
"But health experts still recommend wearing masks in public because, just like the liberal Democrat demanding that the voice of the white people doesn't mean to them."
??????
"Truthseeker" needs more practice writing English.
Run my statement past black people and see what they say.
Needing some practice writing better English myself, I have added one word to it in CAPS.
______
"This thread is itself "a little" racist.
It does not bring out the fact that there are many white people, elderly, low income, etc., as well as black people who have no access to the internet and have some difficulty coming up with ID, a fact THAT hits blacks harder simply because the poverty levels are higher among them."
You guess that's why several in the interview said that voter ID laws are "a little" racist?
LOL, it also occurs to me that there are blacks who are far better than I am at using "smart" phone technology, etc., etc., etc.
(This white old geezer is not as up to date on all that as they are.)
In the 2010 midterm election, voters from all over the place gave President Obama what he himself called “a shellacking.” And oh boy, was it ever. You could be a total moron and get elected just by having an R next to your name—and that year, by the way, we did pick up a fair number in that category.
Retaking control of the House of Representatives put me in line to be the next Speaker of the House over the largest freshman Republican class in history: 87 newly elected members of the GOP. Since I was presiding over a large group of people who’d never sat in Congress, I felt I owed them a little tutorial on governing. I had to explain how to actually get things done. A lot of that went straight through the ears of most of them, especially the ones who didn’t have brains that got in the way.
It does not bring out the fact that there are many white people, elderly, low income, etc., as well as black people who have no access to the internet and have some difficulty coming up with I
Well first, the video didn't bring that up at all. In fact it provided no evidence of anyone who have issues getting voter ID.
Secondly, the video did specifically ask black people about the idea that voter ID laws were racist and they believe that concept to be racist.
I get the feeling that cognitive dissonance would not allow you to actually watch the video straight through.
But lastly Reverend. If the issue really is about the "poor" and not specifically about race, then why is the rhetoric, the narrative, and attempts to change the voter laws focused on race rather than economics?
Who gives a shit what he thinks?
White supremacy or white supremacism is the belief that white people are superior to those of other races and thus should dominate them. The belief favors the maintenance and defense of white power and privilege. White supremacy has roots in the discredited doctrine of scientific racism.
You were born with superior genetics.
The same people used to believe that the earth is flat.
The Republicans of this era have returned to the 12th century. They were born to rule the entire world.
Good morning Roger...
Are you pretending to not be here again today?
Truthseeker said...
White supremacy or white supremacism is the belief that white people are superior to those of other races
Those definitely are the people thinking blacks have trouble even getting ID's
What a racist belief.
From the Democrat party that was founded on racism.
And still is.
"Roger AmickMarch 31, 2021 at 6:59 PM
"American Greatness is a fucking joke"
Richard Grenell
https://twitter.com/RichardGrenell/status/1378141011512160259
Everyone must speak out - showing your ID is not racist but an essential part of public safety.
The public is overwhelmingly with us. Overwhelmingly. Only the DC media mob and radical Democrats are against it.
Hi Roger, hope your morning is going well.
I see you hatched more monikers.
The Fact that American Greatness is real and Capitalism as practiced in the USA is a roaring success does not change because you are a unmitigated disaster of a dumpster fire.
Breaking911
Poll: https://mobile.twitter.com/Breaking911/status/1378125264824197120
UGA/AJC POLL: Nearly 75% of Georgia voters support requiring photo ID to vote
72 % of Americans
Of course this is not a state media "poll"
My mistake, the 72 % poll was AP
70-75% of Americans are in favor of a Federal Voter ID law depending on the poll.
That would put us in line with ever other first world Democracy on earth other than Russia (who is the only other Democracy that allows people to vote incognito).
Only the 2021 American liberal would be so self-absorbed and high and mighty to believe that the rest of the world and three quarters of America are all racist because they don't agree with them.
But let's be clear. Nobody really believes Voter ID laws are racist or that minorities would not be able to vote. This is 100% about the fact that Voter ID laws cut down on voter fraud and Liberals are scared shitless that without fraud, they would never win.
In the 2020 election is that we saw the highest turnout in any election since 1900 — in part because of expanded access to mail ballots. Current projections suggest about two-thirds of eligible voters cast ballots, which would beat every election since 1900, when more than 7 in 10 eligible American voters cast ballots, according to numbers from the United States Election Project. The outcome is thus more reflective of the actual will of the American people.
The legislation in Georgia is designed to make it much more difficult to vote by mail. The Republicans claimed that the Democratic candidates won because a lot of them were invalid, despite the fact there was no evidence of mail fraud.
The margins were so small, that making it more difficult to vote by mail, so they can win, despite the voice of the people is the foundation of our democratic Republic.
I'm getting sick and tired of your Alex Jones philosophy. From day one when you said that a deep state organization was been trying to destroy the Orange Monster.
Your getting worse every day.
John Cooper
PRESS RELEASES: https://mobile.twitter.com/thejcoop/status/1378172548060487680
MLB: We’ve gotta get the All Star Game out of Atlanta!
Also MLB: We gotta get that Chinese market, who cares about human rights!
MLB is just BLM backwards
China loves both
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/11/12/how-big-is-joe-bidens-mandate/
Rep. Jeff Duncan
https://mobile.twitter.com/RepJeffDuncan/status/1378074529076015106
In light of @MLB's stance to undermine election integrity laws, I have instructed my staff to begin drafting legislation to remove Major League Baseball's federal antitrust exception.
GOOD
We had the most secure election in history ,and you keep saying the it was fraudulent.
Keeping a few thousand Democrats voters from voting will get Republicans elected despite the voice of the people is the foundation of our Republic asshole Alex Jones on steroids asshole
We in Kansas have had required ID to vote for years.
Acceptable Forms of Photo ID
Driver’s license or ID card issued by Kansas or another stateU.S. PassportU.S. Military IDID card issued by a Native American tribeEmployee badge or ID issued by a government officeStudent ID card from an accredited postsecondary education institution in KansasConcealed carry license issued by Kansas or another statePublic assistance ID card issued by a government office
Kansas pays for an ID if your ass is too broke to buy one.
But let's be clear. Nobody really believes Voter ID laws are racist or that minorities would not be able to vote. This is 100% about the fact that Voter ID laws cut down on voter fraud and Liberals are scared shitless that without fraud, they would never win.
Whatever the DNC talking point is the MSM "news" activists compliantly put out and their followers regurgitate.
You can see it all day here with the Bezo's Washington Post, NYT and CNN etc.
to liberals the end justifies the means and everything is OK to get to that end.
"Your getting worse every day."
Nope , CHT is kicking your rag a muffin ass.
You gutless prissy bitch.
PeKing James
https://twitter.com/pekingjames/status/1378121133569015810
Thank you @MLB for following the lead of my dear friend President Xi and supporting everyone’s right to vote! My great and magnanimous Leader even allowed the Uighurs the freedom to vote themselves into slavery.
Kyle Morris
Article: https://twitter.com/RealKyleMorris/status/1378131984216645644
Major League Baseball operates a player Development Center in Communist China while relocating their All-Star Game from Atlanta, Georgia, merely because Georgia’s residents must use an ID to vote due to a newly passed state law.
China's government is good guys, guys.
They even take care of "the big guy"
Roger Amick said...
The margins were so small, that making it more difficult to vote by mail, so they can win, despite the voice of the people is the foundation of our democratic Republic.
The margins were so small, that making it easy for a little fraud to occur so they can win, despite the voice of the people is the foundation of our democratic Republic.
fixed but still using rogerspeak
Scott, I have been thinking about this. Nate Cohen said that the Republicans might trigger anger at the ballot box.
If the Democrats, like they did last year, get out the vote!
A final reason is that voting restrictions may backfire by angering and energizing Democratic voters. This law’s restrictions on handing out water in line, for instance, may do more to mobilize Democrats than to stop them from voting. One recent study even theorized that the Supreme Court’s decision to roll back elements of the Voting Rights Act didn’t reduce Black turnout because subsequent efforts to restrict voting were swiftly countered by efforts to mobilize Black voters.
That doesn’t mean the Georgia law or other such laws are without consequence. Many make voting more difficult, enough to intimidate or discourage some voters. Many outright disenfranchise voters, even if only in small numbers. Perhaps the disenfranchisement of even a single voter merits outrage and opposition, especially if the law is passed on dubious or even fabricated grounds, and with Jim Crow mass disenfranchisement as a historical backdrop.
But setting aside intent, it does mean that many such voting provisions, like that in Georgia, are unlikely to have a huge effect on turnout or Democratic
There are consequences to misunderstanding the stakes of changing voting laws. Minor changes in voting access can overshadow larger issues, including the kinds of potentially significant provisions in the Georgia law that empower the State Legislature. The democracy reform bill H.R. 1, for instance, would do quite a bit to expand voting access but relatively little to protect against partisan interference in election administration.
The perception that voting laws have existential stakes for democracy or the political viability of the two parties has made bipartisan compromise extremely difficult. The virtue of bipartisanship is often and understandably dismissed as naïve, but voting laws are a rare case where bipartisanship has value of its own. Democracy, after all, depends on the consent of the loser.
If you had watched the MSM instead of reading Infowars you would have seen the efforts to get out the vote.
There was no fraud asshole.
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/04/03/upshot/georgia-election-law-turnout.html
Biden didn't win because of fraud, that you keep saying like Alex Jones has infected your mind
The Trump Recovery continues.
The question is will Socialism directed by Biden kill off the gains.
His open attack upon main street mom and pop stores and small family farms is disgusting.
Supported by Roger and James.
We’re all in this together — unless you’re a Republican.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/04/01/telnaes-cartoon-republicans-coronavirus-wwii-posters/
The rights of the individual over ride those of the Government.
The former inherited the longest economic recovery in history, and despite that, he mishandled the worst medical crisis in a century..
Sleepy Joe Biden is the President now, and the recovery is his legacy kputz.
So Roger...
Why can't you just be honest.
Of course there was fraud. It was reported all over the place. Dozens if not hundreds were arrested after the last election and many have already been convicted. At least two cases involved potential fraud of thousands of mail in ballots.
Not only that but court rulings in three different battleground state have ruled (after the fact) that Governor executive orders were illegal and should not have been followed and will not be followed in the future.
The argument (your argument and the argument of your ilk) was that there was not enough fraud found that it would alter the election.
Or have you already forgotten your own argument, Roger?
I ask you a simple question regarding hypocrisy.
Advocates for more secure elections have proven over and over and over that people who should not vote are voting. That people are voting multiple times. They have proven over and over that voter fraud exists and their are criminal conviction to back it up.
But whenever someone asks to show evidence of someone, anyone, one particular real life person who is actually perfectly capable of figuring out how to either go to vote or get a ballot absentee and send it in... but somehow incapable of securing a free ID, you come up short every single time.
Why do we always demand to see more and more proof of fraud, while discounting any and all fraud found as to be not enough to worry abot.
But you demand that no proof is necessary to find any actual examples of people who would not be able to vote because of a Voter ID law.
Because those ID laws work everywhere else on the planet earth just fine.
We’re all in this together — unless you’re a Republican.
Well then, quite obviously we are not "all" in this together, huh?
SCOTTIE/CH SAYS
But let's be clear. Nobody really believes Voter ID laws are racist or that minorities would not be able to vote. This is 100% about the fact that Voter ID laws cut down on voter fraud and Liberals are scared shitless that without fraud, they would never win.
We just won a major election WITHOUT FRAUD to the tune of some seven million votes.
If Trump supporters didn't storm the Capitol on January 6th, yesterday's attack would have never happened. Trump is responsible. Republicans are responsible.
MY STATEMENT
AND THEN MY COMMENTS IN CAPS:
JAMES SAID:
It [THE VIDEO] does not bring out the fact that there are many white people, elderly, low income, etc., as well as black people who have no access to the internet and have some difficulty coming up with I [THE REST OF THE STATEMENT IS CUT OFF]
Well first, the video didn't bring that up at all. I SAID THAT IT DID NOT BRING THAT UP. In fact it provided no evidence of anyone who have issues getting voter ID. THAT DOES NOT MEAN THERE ARE NO SUCH ISSUES AMONG BOTH WHITES AND BLACKS WHO DO NOT HAVE ACCESS TO COMPUTERS OR WHO DO NOT DRIVE, ETC.
Secondly, the video did specifically ask black people about the idea that voter ID laws were racist and they believe that concept to be racist.
I get the feeling that cognitive dissonance would not allow you to actually watch the video straight through.
I WATCHED THE ENTIRE VIDEO, FROM BEGINNING TO END.
But lastly Reverend. If the issue really is about the "poor" and not specifically about race, then why is the rhetoric, the narrative, and attempts to change the voter laws focused on race rather than economics?
YOU ARE NOT REALLY TOO STUPID TO KNOW THAT IF YOU CAN REDUCE THE NUMBER OF VOTES OF THOSE WHO ARE AMONG THE MORE DISADVANTAGED, THAT WILL SIGNIFICANTLY REDUCE THE BLACK VOTE, WHICH IS LARGELY DEMOCRATIC, AND THAT IS THE REAL PURPOSE OF THESE LAWS, AS SOME GOP LAWMAKERS HAVE OPENLY ADMITTED.
William Barr There was not enough evidence of fraud to have changed the outcome of this election.
But let's be clear. Nobody really believes Voter ID laws are racist or that minorities would not be able to vote. This is 100% about the fact that Voter ID laws cut down on voter fraud and Liberals are scared shitless that without fraud, they would never win.
The only person in this room believes that this election was effected by fraudulent ballots is guess who?
Alex Jones aka Thecoldheartedtruth
Andy Ngô
https://mobile.twitter.com/MrAndyNgo/status/1378111027519324160
The man responsible for the deadly Good Friday Capitol Hill attack was a devout follower of Louis Farrakhan & the black nationalist Nation of Islam group. Farrakhan has close ties to Democrat leaders. Will the media make sure they’re made to answer for those links?
Of course not
Just like the violent BLM rioters preceding the Capitol Hill protest rarely were fully prosecuted.
No longer any equal justice.
Laws applied based on political belief
Blatantly ignored during elections
Banana Republic
James, he will never admit Thecoldheartedtruth, because he is a narcissist pathological person without empathy.
YOU ARE NOT REALLY TOO STUPID TO KNOW THAT IF YOU CAN REDUCE THE NUMBER OF VOTES OF THOSE WHO ARE AMONG THE MORE DISADVANTAGED, THAT WILL SIGNIFICANTLY REDUCE THE BLACK VOTE, WHICH IS LARGELY DEMOCRATIC, AND THAT IS THE REAL PURPOSE OF THESE LAWS, AS SOME GOP LAWMAKERS HAVE OPENLY ADMITTED.
Zaid Jilani
https://twitter.com/ZaidJilani/status/1378123041146802177
The Braves oppose the MLB's move because well, so does Jon Ossoff, Lisa Cupid, Stacey Abrams, and basically everyone in Georgia. Who the heck advocates for boycotting their own state? It's not a conspiracy.
Well at least this is uniting Georgia.
While dividing America
Banana Republic
I WATCHED THE ENTIRE VIDEO, FROM BEGINNING TO END.
Then obviously you didn't understand the point.
YOU ARE NOT REALLY TOO STUPID TO KNOW THAT IF YOU CAN REDUCE THE NUMBER OF VOTES OF THOSE WHO ARE AMONG THE MORE DISADVANTAGED, THAT WILL SIGNIFICANTLY REDUCE THE BLACK VOTE, WHICH IS LARGELY DEMOCRATIC, AND THAT IS THE REAL PURPOSE OF THESE LAWS, AS SOME GOP LAWMAKERS HAVE OPENLY ADMITTED.
Well all caps, huh, Reverend? Must be serious!
Problem being... nobody on your side has produced even one example of a single person who is otherwise capable of figuring out either the process of voting in person or voting via mail... who is not capable of getting an ID.
This is why all of the legal challenges to Voter ID laws end up failing. They cannot find any valid people with legal standing to say they are otherwise incapable of getting an ID.
The entire argument against Voter ID is assumptive. It assumes what is not proven or even plausible. Because voter ID laws work in every other country in the world.
Unless you are arguing (as a white liberal who loves to demean minorities) that our minority population is not a smart and capable as minorities in other countries?
Breanna Morello
https://twitter.com/breannamorello/status/1378351829038284801
You know what’s racist?
Thinking minorities are incapable of obtaining an ID.
FACT CHECK - TRUE
And actually keeping the sanctity of the vote should require at least a little effort for those participating to keep our nation free.
always Wrong Roger, is again spectacularly stupid and wrong.
Economics and Personal finance elude you Roger.
I
WHAT A BASTARD! WHAT AN ABSOLUTE BASTARD!
How Trump Fleeced His Own Supporters
`:20 pm EDT By Taegan Goddard politicalwire.com
New York Times:
“Facing a cash crunch and getting badly outspent by the Democrats, the campaign had begun last September to set up recurring donations by default for online donors, for every week until the election. Contributors had to wade through a fine-print disclaimer and manually uncheck a box to opt out.
“As the election neared, the Trump team made that disclaimer increasingly opaque, an investigation by The New York Times showed. It introduced a second prechecked box, known internally as a ‘money bomb,’ that doubled a person’s contribution. Eventually its solicitations featured lines of text in bold and capital letters that overwhelmed the opt-out language.
“The tactic ensnared scores of unsuspecting Trump loyalists — retirees, military veterans, nurses and even experienced political operatives. Soon, banks and credit card companies were inundated with fraud complaints from the president’s own supporters about donations they had not intended to make, sometimes for thousands of dollars."
WHAT A BASTARD! WHAT AN ABSOLUTE BASTARD!
RE WHAT A BASTARD:
How Trump Steered Supporters Into Unwitting Donations
Online donors were guided into weekly recurring contributions. Demands for refunds spiked. Complaints to banks and credit card companies soared. But the money helped keep Donald Trump’s struggling campaign afloat.
_____________
Stacy Blatt was in hospice care last September listening to Rush Limbaugh’s dire warnings about how badly Donald J. Trump’s campaign needed money when he went online and chipped in everything he could: $500.
It was a big sum for a 63-year-old battling cancer and living in Kansas City on less than $1,000 per month. But that single contribution — federal records show it was his first ever — quickly multiplied. Another $500 was withdrawn the next day, then $500 the next week and every week through mid-October, without his knowledge — until Mr. Blatt’s bank account had been depleted and frozen. When his utility and rent payments bounced, he called his brother, Russell, for help.
What the Blatts soon discovered was $3,000 in withdrawals by the Trump campaign in less than 30 days. They called their bank and said they thought they were victims of fraud.
“It felt,” Russell said, “like it was a scam.”
But what the Blatts believed was duplicity was actually an intentional scheme to boost revenues by the Trump campaign and the for-profit company that processed its online donations, WinRed. Facing a cash crunch and getting badly outspent by the Democrats, the campaign had begun last September to set up recurring donations by default for online donors, for every week until the election.
Contributors had to wade through a fine-print disclaimer and manually uncheck a box to opt out.
As the election neared, the Trump team made that disclaimer increasingly opaque, an investigation by The New York Times showed. It introduced a second prechecked box, known internally as a “money bomb,” that doubled a person’s contribution. Eventually its solicitations featured lines of text in bold and capital letters that overwhelmed the opt-out language.
The tactic ensnared scores of unsuspecting Trump loyalists — retirees, military veterans, nurses and even experienced political operatives. Soon, banks and credit card companies were inundated with fraud complaints from the president’s own supporters about donations they had not intended to make, sometimes for thousands of dollars.
“Bandits!” said Victor Amelino, a 78-year-old Californian, who made a $990 online donation to Mr. Trump in early September via WinRed. It recurred seven more times — adding up to almost $8,000. “I’m retired. I can’t afford to pay all that damn money.”
The sheer magnitude of the money involved is staggering for politics. In the final two and a half months of 2020, the Trump campaign, the Republican National Committee and their shared accounts issued more than 530,000 refunds worth $64.3 million to online donors. All campaigns make refunds for various reasons, including to people who give more than the legal limit. But the sum the Trump operation refunded dwarfed that of Joseph R. Biden Jr.’s campaign and his equivalent Democratic committees, which made 37,000 online refunds totaling $5.6 million in that time.
The recurring donations swelled Mr. Trump’s treasury in September and October, just as his finances were deteriorating. He was then able to use tens of millions of dollars he raised after the election, under the guise of fighting his unfounded fraud claims, to help cover the refunds he owed.
WHAT A REAL, GENUINE BASTARD!
THE ARTICLE CONTINUES. GO TO POLITICALWIRE.COM AND CLICK ON THE BLUE LINK FOR THE ENTIRE FIASCO.
JamesNewLeaf
WHAT A BASTARD! WHAT AN ABSOLUTE BASTARD!
and a POS "pastor"
FACT CHECK - TRUE
ROFLMFAO !!!
Post a Comment