This is what the left has fallen to now...

Joe Biden wants to instill racial hatred and resentment as the new American values.

In the U.S. we have always regarded the individual to be the object of justice. In theory, if not always in practice, each of us are more than archetypes of the groups to which we belong or subjects of the state. Rooted in the Declaration’s recognition that all are created equal and endowed with inalienable rights, the American Idea has held (to quote Ronald Reagan) that “you and I have within ourselves the God-given right and the ability to determine our own destiny.” Informed by the Judeo-Christian recognition that each person is created in the image of God and has inherent—and not merely instrumental—value, we believe that it is the individual person, even as he or she is embedded in a web of relationships, that is the bearer of rights. Much of our history has involved a struggle to grow into the fullness of this idea.

 Any doubt we might have about Biden’s intentions is dispelled by his call for a government-wide effort to pursue “equity” within the federal government. As others have pointed out, racial progressives have advanced the concept of “equity” to replace the “old” and “outmoded” concept of equality. For proponents of “equity,” there is no distinction between equal opportunity and equal results. Indeed, as Ibram X. Kendi and other proponents of critical race theory would have it, any deviation of the latter from the former—at least if it results in the “underrepresentation” of a panoply of groups thought to be disfavored—is assumed to be the result of “entrenched” discrimination. The group disparity must be eliminated.

Government, corporate, and academic elites will manage an “equitable” society—perhaps socialist; maybe corporatist—in which society’s opportunities and goods will be directed by fiat to the groups that deserve them. In order to achieve group parity, individuals must be treated differently on the basis of their race or sex without regard to their individual culpability or injury. Doing so is the only path to “equity” and it is imperative that federal employees and contractors (as well as the general public) be made to understand and accept this.

For all its emphasis on individuality and tolerance, a pluralist and classically liberal society requires, for lack of a better word, a citizenry—a population regarded as equally entitled to its benefits and equally obligated to assume its responsibilities without regard to the incidentals of race, sex, sexuality, etc. This citizenry must believe that its members will be judged as individuals and not as archetypes. It must see itself as comprising one nation and not a balkanized collection of identities. The notion that we can deviate from the American Idea “just for a while” to “even things out” is fanciful. Biden’s way is not the path to diversity and inclusion, but to division and collapse. It is certainly not the way back to normal. It will not “build back better.”

This has become the calling card of pretty much everything liberal these days. After decades of attempting to move past identification by race and judging by race, the modern day liberal wants the country to demand that we go back to identification and judgment by race. The difference being that they now want to identify those who are successful and make a blanket judgement about them. That judgement (of course) is that their success was never earned.

As the theory goes, anyone who has risen above another person has done so because the underlying systemic racism. The intellectual problems with this theory are so broad and so obvious that they must apparently have the ability to hide in broad daylight. 

The first problem is that an aggregate of one race or the other flies in the fact that we do not otherwise demand an equitable result within the races. These philosophers apparently are able to get past the fact that two black people with almost identical underlying conditions will many times end up in entirely different end results, just as two white people or two Hispanic people, or even two Asian people. 

Nope, the only time they see the difference is when one person of one race ends up doing better than another.  Moreover, that logic "only" applies when a White person does better than a Black or Hispanic person. They apparently have a blind spot as it pertains to Asians, who enjoy more financial success than any race here in America. 

So at the end of the day, there is no logic, there is no real explanation, there is just a blind commitment to the concept that everything is the fault of "Whitey" and every success and every failure can be chalked up to systemic racism and White supremacy. It's the ultimate blame game and a means for liberals to suggest that nobody is ever fully responsible for their own lives. Which at the end of the day is the philosophy that liberals are ultimately striving to control all decision making.