Liberals scream about fairness, but they are the ones who get away with things...

Liberals don't want fairness. They want things to be unfair to their advantage

Think for a second about Gaige "lefty" Grosskreutz, the third man shot and the only so called victim to live that night in Kenosha. Grosskreutz for some reason is labeled a hero by the left. One of the good guys. Of course he is a man with a long criminal past, including assaulting his own grandmother.  Puts him right up there with other liberal heros, such as those who stick guns in the bellies of pregnant women.  

According to Grosskreutz's own testimony:

• He is affiliated  (aka a member) of a violent group associated with Antifa
• He was illegally carrying a concealed handgun that he had no permit for
• He pulled out his gun and ran after Rittenhouse
• He got within 3-4 feet of Rittenhouse who had fallen to the ground
• He then aimed the loaded handgun at Rittenhouse's head

Now check me if I am wrong, but you cannot carry a concealed handgun without a permit. I believe that happens to be a crime. Chasing after someone with a loaded gun in hand is threatening behavior that could constitute assault with a deadly weapon. Aiming a gun at someone can certainly be constituted as the sort of threatening behavior that rises to assault with a deadly weapon and could constitute bigger charges if you convince a jury that Grosskreutz was planning on shooting

Under the laws of almost every state, you don't have to use a deadly weapon to get charged with assault. You just have to threaten or demonstrate a threat. For the same reasons that the jury found Rittenhouse not guilty of a crime when he shot Grosskreutz, another jury certainly might conclude that Grosskreutz actions provoked a threat and made Rittenhouse fear for his life. That is the very definition of that version of assault with a deadly weapon.

 

In other words, the actions of Grosskreutz were such that these same prosecutors could have charged him with carrying a concealed weapon without a permit, assault with a deadly weapon, and quite possibly attempted murder (if you argue that he planned on shooting). They have Grosskreutz dead to rights on the gun charge, an impartial jury has determined that his actions were threatening to Rittenhouse meaning that conviction on assault is a no-brainer. The only question is whether they can convince a jury that he actually meant to shoot. 

Here is the kicker here folks.

Instead of charging the career criminal with an actual slam dunk case that would have most certainly ended with convictions, they went after the 17 year child with no criminal past with charges that they had to know had little chance of success. At the end of the day it was Grosskreutz who was provided the "privilege" of playing the victim, while it was Rittenhouse who suffered from completely unfair and totally unjustified prosecution as the these unfair and biased prosecutors tried to paint him the villian.

Why? 

Because Grosskreutz is associated with the BLM violent Antifa crowd that so many liberals will defend to the end, while Rittenhouse is associated with the right. If not for politics, the man who was breaking the law would have been charged and convicted. Instead, because of politics a boy was charged with a crime that the prosecution never had any chance to prove in any fair court.