Most legal analysts see it likely that USSC upholds Mississippi Abortion law
The Supreme Court on Wednesday signaled that it is on the verge of a major shift in its abortion jurisprudence and is likely to uphold a Mississippi law that mostly prohibits the procedure after 15 weeks of pregnancy.
Whether that would mean overruling Roe v. Wade’s finding that women have a fundamental right to end their pregnancies was unclear. But none of the six conservatives who make up the court’s majority expressed support for maintaining the court’s rule that states may not prohibit abortion before the point of fetal viability, which is generally estimated to be between 22 and 24 weeks.
Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., often the most moderate of the conservatives, said Mississippi’s limit of 15 weeks was not a “dramatic departure” from viability and gave women enough time to make the choice to end their pregnancies.
Now keep in mind that this is not the Texas so called "heartbeat law" that basically outlaws abortions after just a few weeks and possibly even before some women would even know they are pregnant. I believe that it's more than possible to see a legal difference between a law that says abortions are illegal after 15 weeks (when 22 is the current standard) and one that makes it illegal after 6 weeks.
But many will argue that moving the benchmark from the fairly established 22 weeks is a significant step for the courts to take, even if 15 weeks still seems reasonable in comparison to 6 weeks. That this sort of shift opens up the slippery slope where another state will jump in with 12 weeks, and then some other state will push something at 10 weeks, and so on and so forth.
At one time the courts generally found any law that restricted abortions prior to the third trimester (26 weeks) other than for health concerns to be unconstitutional. Right now the survival rate at 22 weeks is generally less than 10% while just two weeks later (at 24 weeks) the survival rate is around 60%. As far as I know, no premature baby has survived when born prior to 20 weeks and certainly not at 15 weeks.
So at the very least, if the Mississippi law is upheld, the idea of a constitutional requirement of abortions only being allowed to be restricted after viability is a goner. That would be a significant ruling for better or worse depending on your view.
76 comments:
We pretty much agree...
But if this matters
20 weeks and certainly not at 15 week. The trimester..
And rape and incest, abortion should be considered.
Because they are not legislators, I don't know what will be yet..
I don't know if they can specifically allow exceptions
I think it would hurt Republicans because women don't want the government to have total control over their bodies...
It might damage the reputation of the Supreme Court.. it's too political...
If the court had any balls they'd shitcan the whole thing as bad law - which it definitely is - and return the whole thing to the states. Let the red states outlaw it, let the blue ones expand their eugenics murder slaughterhouses as they see fit.
And rape and incest, abortion should be considered.
Why? Is the baby any less innocent because it was conceived during rape or incest?
I think it would hurt Republicans because women don't want the government to have total control over their bodies...
Yeah Roger....
A lot of Americans do not want the Government to tell them what to do with their bodies or what vaccines to inject into them.
I am sure you are consistent in your belief of my body my decision... or is that different depending on what your politicians are telling you?
I think it would hurt Republicans because women don't want the government to have total control over their bodies...
Except when it comes to jabbing them in the arm with a vaccine from now until the end of fucking time.
You guys wear your hypocrisy like a badge of honor these days.
You guys wear your hypocrisy like a badge of honor these days.
Roger is a stand up man of principle. He would never suggest that the Government cannot control certain aspects of healthcare decisions but can control others...
That would make Roger a complete hypocrite and Roger will tell us all that he is not a hypocrite.
Legal Insurrection actually agree with me..
SCOTUS Appear to Seek Middle Ground on Abortion After Hearing Mississippi Abortion Oral Arguments
We will likely get a decision in the spring.
That would make Roger a complete hypocrite and Roger will tell us all that he is not a hypocrite.
Roger doesn't know who the fuck he is until some leftist hack from CNN/MSDNC/Mommy Jones/The Atlantic/Vox/Kos/TPM tells him who he is... that day.
He's the only person I've ever seen on any blog I visit whose comments are 100% plagiarisms from others.
Fuck, it's boorish.
Blogger Decent, honest teller of truth said...
A woman's decision to have or not have an abortion does not endanger the health of others.
Well she sure as fuck ain't killing a fucking potted plant, pederast.
Talk to or watch an interview with an abortion SURVIVOR, and ask them if their health was not in danger.
Kermit Gosnell is in prison for LIFE for killing babies that, in his words, "were big enough to walk to the bus stop.
"...the Government cannot control certain aspects of healthcare decisions but can control others..."
_____
Of course the Government can.
A woman's decision to have or not have an abortion does not endanger the health of others.
A person's refusal to be vaccinated can endanger the lives of others.
rrb, like ch, once supported a woman's abortion rights.
Until it became a political horse the Republicans could ride.
But I predict the riding may not go smoothly for Republicans.
Again you draw parallel comparisons...
Forcing a woman to carry a child caused by rape or incest, is a lot different than an injection to protect her health..and prevent danger to other people..
And yes most women don't want to government to control their bodies...
Being able to differentiate is not hypocrisy. Free from my political views.
ch, once supported a woman's abortion rights.
Until he became a political cultist the path Republicans could ride pony Donald
Giddily up
Stacey Abrams Will Run for Governor of Georgia
December 1, 2021 at 3:20 pm EST By Taegan Goddard 64 Comments
Stacey Abrams (D) launched a campaign for Georgia governor with a pledge to fight for economic equality and expand healthcare access, setting up a potential rematch against Gov. Brian Kemp (R) in one of the nation’s most competitive political battlegrounds, the Atlanta Journal Constitution reports.
Tester Makes the Case for Aggressive Climate Action
December 1, 2021 at 3:17 pm EST By Taegan Goddard 22 Comments
“Sen. Jon Tester (D-MT), one of his party’s most centrist members, made an intensely personal case for ambitious climate action in the Democrats’ social spending package,” Politico reports.
“He said this summer’s drought led to the worst year on his farm since they began farming in the 1970s and that he ‘longed’ for the day when his tractor could be powered off a battery, instead of diesel fuel.
Said Tester:
“If we don’t do something about climate change and start today with real solutions, there are going to be a lot of hungry people in this world. A lot of hungry people.”
Trump’s Social Media Company Misses Deadline
December 1, 2021 at 3:03 pm EST By Taegan Goddard 36 Comments
“Former President Donald Trump’s new social media company appears to have missed the November deadline it set to release an invitation-only beta version of ‘Truth Social,’ its purported alternative to Twitter,” CNBC reports.
Judge Says Rally Organizers ‘Stoked the Flames’
December 1, 2021 at 2:25 pm EST By Taegan Goddard 62 Comments
U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson said that those who organized a pro-Trump Jan. 6 rally that preceded the attack on the Capitol “stoked the flames of fear” and deserve to be held accountable for what they unleashed, Politico reports.
Omicron Variant Discovered In California
December 1, 2021 at 2:02 pm EST By Taegan Goddard 116 Comments
The U.S. has identified the first case of the Omicron variant in California, the AP reports.
The person who was infected had returned from South Africa and was fully vaccinated but had not gotten a booster shot yet.
The person is experiencing “mild symptoms.”
Jeffrey Epstein Took 14-Year Old to Meet Trump
December 1, 2021 at 1:56 pm EST By Taegan Goddard 63 Comments
“A woman who says she was sexually abused by Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell testified that Epstein took her to meet Donald Trump at his Florida club when she was 14 years old,”
CNBC reports.
Yawn
By Taegan Goddard
By Taegan Goddard
By Taegan Goddard
By Taegan Goddard
By Taegan Goddard
By Taegan Goddard
By Taegan Goddard
By Taegan Goddard
Too funny.
They did everything according to I Am Science Fauci and still Alky lives in fear.
"The U.S. has identified the first case of the Omicron variant in California, the AP reports."
So what, just the Variant of the Month.
F'ing Daddy.
The Three Socialist Stooges have to cut n post, they can think or debate.
A person's refusal to be vaccinated can endanger the lives of others.
If vaccinations work only those who chose not to be vaccinated would be effected, their choice. And they would be safe from any vaccine side effects.
On the other hand if vaccinated people are the source of the new emerging variants then they are the ones endangering others.
And if long term-studies (non-"emergency") show long=term issues with the vaccine the unvaccinated are unaffected.
Our patience is wearing thin
Earlier today I said that the Supreme Court is not a legislative branch of the government. So it's difficult to break up Roe v Wade and allow abortion after rape or incest. Or first trimester...
This morning....
Justice Sonia Sotomayor used her questions during a Supreme Court hearing Wednesday on abortion rights to urge her conservative colleagues to follow precedent and not politics in deciding the case.
She noted that the sponsors of the 2018 Mississippi abortion law, which would ban most abortions after 15 weeks of pregnancy, had said they were pushing ahead with the legislation and a court challenge "because we have new justices" on the Supreme Court.
Biden's misery
The Misery Index is up to a current: 10.82 October 2021.
First Drop Ever.
Confirmed , Alky is wrong twice more.
"
BLACK FRIDAY DISAPPOINTS, CYBER MONDAY SALES FALL FOR THE FIRST TIME EVER"
If your daughter was raped by her brother or grandfather, do you really think that she shouldn't be forced to give birth to your half grandchild??
Roger, can't debate, he doesn't understand the complexities of a modern Economy.
John Hayward
https://twitter.com/Doc_0/status/1466036138439811074
Roe v. Wade was wrong and everyone knows it, including ferocious defenders of abortion. They excuse its legal and ethical deficiencies because they agree with the outcome - and thus were generations of "ends justify the means" political corruption unleashed.
You can't say you love democracy if you also think democracy should be jettisoned like rubbish every time there's a crisis, every time the ruling elite need to impose a "correct" decision on the entire country through fiat. Roe helped launch our drift toward authoritarianism.
Sure, you can talk about "freedom" and cast your silly little votes - but the really important decisions will be made on high by the Anointed Ones and imposed from coast to coast through inescapable decrees. You are not allowed to vote on a growing list of "settled" issues.
There is a continuum leading from Roe to our evolving modern system of authoritarianism and fascism - political decrees enforced through corporate muscle. Democracy was subverted, and authoritarianism was the inevitable result. It's snowballing very rapidly now.
A TV host just went on a foamy tirade and demanded authoritarian rule, with U.S. troops deployed against civilians. We are very far down the slope that began with "you grubby Little People can't be trusted to make decisions about abortion."
We were told not to trust democracy, the republic, federalism - i.e. not to trust OURSELVES - to handle the unquestionably painful issue of abortion. Rejecting that decision would be a good first step toward regaining our common dignity and resisting authoritarianism.
The post-Roe landscape would be messy and "divisive," absolutely. There would be bitter arguments and heated elections. And that's how democracy works. That stuff means it IS working. It's not always placid - and a strong nation, a great people, can handle that.
If Americans wish to be a great people, we must not shy away from the burdens of responsibility that come with greatness. We must not hand tough decisions over to the elite with an exasperated sigh, trading the tough arguments of freedom for manufactured "consensus."
And if you don't want to be ruled by authoritarians, you must reject ends-justify-the-means power grabs. If limits on power are jettisoned in times of strife and fear, the elite will never stop finding ways to divide and terrify us. /end
Again you draw parallel comparisons...
Forcing a woman to carry a child caused by rape or incest, is a lot different than an injection to protect her health..and prevent danger to other people..
And yes most women don't want to government to control their bodies...
Being able to differentiate is not hypocrisy. Free from my political views.
Objective thinking seems to escape your mind Scott...
Vivek Ramaswamy
https://twitter.com/VivekGRamaswamy/status/1465817217761787920
The lack of media interest in the mass murder in Waukesha is curious, compared to its obsession over Kenosha last year.
state media
1984
A woman's decision to have or not have an abortion does not endanger the health of others. A person's refusal to be vaccinated can endanger the lives of other.
Actually a fundamentally wrong statement.
An abortion does technically and purposely kill what is biologically known to be as a human fetus, something that will grow into a human. In science and biology, our lives technically begin at conception (from a purely scientific standpoint)... so you are killing.
A vaccine is only really designed to kill off a virus. Nobody catches that virus because someone is not vaccinated. They can only catch that virus if someone who is otherwise sick or positive with Covid decides to go out in public and introduce it onto others.
So the real blame for the spread would be 100% on those who leave the house and mingle with people while they are sick (and don't bother to check).
A person can be unvaccinated till the earth ends and if they do not catch the virus, they cannot spread it.
Heartless .
"Blogger Decent, honest teller of truth said...
A woman's decision to have or not have an abortion does not endanger the health of others"
Really, so.the baby lives?
New Poll 52 % of Americans strongly disapprove of Biden
only 18 % strongly approve
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1I26ZGuoHv5DMD6gutozCl_VZlzmkDpEF/view
worst president ever
and in a free fall
This argument goes a lot further than this decision...
Roe to our evolving modern system of authoritarianism.
The Supreme Court decision on Marbury vs Madison gave them the authority to overturn state laws, because they were not in the Constitution as they decide. .
Roe to our evolving modern system of authoritarianism.
If his view on the authority of the state governments can write any law. Including slavery!
Originally the 13 states had the authority to write any law. Because we were The United States of America.
Basically it was a union of different countries.
Marbury vs Madison changed us into The United States of America. And each state could not enforce laws that were not Constitutional.
Chris Buskirk
https://twitter.com/thechrisbuskirk/status/1466090854892900355
BREAKING: Biden Approval Plunges to 36% according to new Trafalgar Poll.
Democrat unpopular across America; generic ballot gives GOP BIG advantage.
hopefully the country can survive until the mid-terms
F'ING Daddy
When sales of black Friday "dissapoints" and Cyber Monday Drops for the first time in history.
Bidenomics has failed.
Socialism ="instead of shares property and cooperative with even other person."Alky
A guy that has never owned a clear deed is wanting property given to him.
Your parents failed to teach you about work.
Marbury v Madison established the concept that the courts could declare an act of Congress void if it violates the constitution. It really isn't a "State" thing as much as it establishes a requirement that any law must pass constitutional muster.
We almost agree with you first statement. But I still support first trimester abortion...because it should be her decision. And rape and incest...
An abortion does technically and purposely kill what is biologically known to be as a human fetus, something that will grow into a human. In science and biology, our lives technically begin at conception (from a purely scientific standpoint)... so you are killing.
This is 100%;incorrect...
Nobody catches that virus because someone is not vaccinated.
A non vaccinated person can get infected and can spread it others..
Your word salads made no sense....
A person can be unvaccinated till the earth ends and if they do not catch the virus, they cannot spread it.
True but
An unvaccinated person can get infected...and infect others.
Do you know Liberal Speak?
Madam Sec. Buttigeg said
"Underserved Urban Residents " is that a nice way of saying "poor people"?
He told those "Underserved Urban Residents " to go buy Electric cars.
Your parents failed to teach you about work.
Wow stump broke.....who is unemployed and lives in his mommy's root cellar lecturing about work and property......BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!
An unvaccinated person can get infected...and infect others.
A vaccinated person can get infected...and infect others.
both true
Your word salads made no sense....
Actually Roger it makes perfect sense.
From a biological standpoint you can only transmit Covid if you actually have Covid and then go mingle around people. It's impossible to transmit Covid if you have not caught Covid.
A fully vaccinated person can catch Covid and then pass it along to others, just as an unvaccinated person can catch Covid and pass it along.
Neither a vaccinated or unvaccinated person can pass Covid without actually having the virus in their system.
So the issue here isn't whether someone is vaccinated or unvaccinated. It is entirely based on whether or not they go out in public and mingle around people when they have Covid symptoms.
Oh look Alky's ass spoke.
CDC, fully Vaccinated people can infect others.
So, I will continue to pass on the experimental drug.
Blogger KansasDemocrat said...
CDC, fully Vaccinated people can infect others.
So, I will continue to pass on the experimental drug.
Good.
If you can get and transmit Covid whether you're vaccinated or NOT, then getting vaccinated is no solution at all. Achieving a 100% vaccination rate is no solution at all.
And don't compare it to childhood vaccinations which have been PROVEN effective. The Covid vaccinations received FDA approval after only 2 months rather than the standard 2 years.
Stump broken goat fucker again proves he makes rocks look smart!!!!!! BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!
Blogger C.H. Truth said...
Marbury v Madison established the concept that the courts could declare an act of Congress void if it violates the constitution. It really isn't a "State" thing as much as it establishes a requirement that any law must pass constitutional muster.
The alky is on about a six month rotation interval of bringing up Marbury v. Madison and he STILL doesn't understand what it means.
My wife and I both had covid .
It was not a big deal.
And now we have a proven vaccination, natural immunity.
"The alky is on about a six month rotation interval of bringing up Marbury v. Madison and he STILL doesn't understand what it means."
No he doesn't.
He also doesn't know shit about the US Economic data he pukes here.
Reality is simple
An unvaccinated person who stays home and avoids people is not dangerous at all to society.
A vaccinated person who goes out in public and believes that the cold like symptoms cannot be Covid because he is vaccinated can be dangerous.
You want safety, you need to stay away from people when you get even marginally sick... vaccinated or not. Otherwise you are part of the problem.
WSJ reports
John Roberts expressed openness to the 15-week ban at issue, putting aside broader implications for abortion rights. He suggested that reducing the time frame in which a woman could obtain an abortion wouldn’t dramatically abridge the ability to terminate an unwanted pregnancy.
By the end of the session, the preponderance of questions displayed a focus not on whether Mississippi would prevail, but rather whether the court would simply allow the state to impose new limits on abortion rights or issue a more sweeping ruling that removes constitutional protections for abortion altogether.
They may not declare it unconstitutional. Because it actually blocks every issue like the first trimester of rape and incest
..
LOL -
The first case of the omicron variant has hit the US shores...
in Mexifornia.
My wife and I both had covid .
It was not a big deal.
BWAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!! There are 800k dead Americans that feel otherwise asshole
There are 800k dead Americans that feel otherwise asshole
Really... so how do dead people feel exactly?
The 14th ammonia may have an effect on the decision.
No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
Life and liberty to make their own decisions about abortion???
This amendment brought state laws into the Supreme Court jurisdiction.
Really... so how do dead people feel exactly?
They only reveal their feelings every two years when they vote democrat.
Anonymous The Real Coldheartedtruth said...
The 14th ammonia may have an effect on the decision.
And it says so right there in Mayonnaise v. Medicine.
Life and liberty to make their own decisions about abortion???
You tell em Rog!
Don't forget to get angry about people not being able to make their own decisions about vaccines while you are at it! Talk about liberty being deprived, huh?
Roger... the consistent man of principle!
The 14th ammonia may have an effect on the decision.
It will definitely be a sterile decision.
My wife and I both had covid.
It was not a big deal.
And now we have a proven vaccination, natural immunity.
____________
Have you had a booster?
If not, that "natural immunity" may not protect you enough.
My wife and I have not had covid.
We got vaccinated and got boosters.
She teaches at the university and was required to get them, which she gladly did.
Decent, honest teller of truth said...
My wife and I have not had covid.
We got vaccinated and got boosters.
She teaches at the university and was required to get them, which she gladly did.
EXCELLENT, now you can leave us alone
The COVID con is the '76 swine flu fiasco on steroids
The segment opened with late 60 Minutes host Mike Wallace saying:
The flu season is upon us. Which type will we worry about this year, and what kind of shots will we be told to take? Remember the swine flu scare of 1976? That was the year the U.S. government told us all that swine flu could turn out to be a killer that could spread across the nation, and Washington decided that every man, woman and child in the nation should get a shot to prevent a nation-wide outbreak, a pandemic.
Well, 46 million of us obediently took the shot, and now 4,000 Americans are claiming damages from Uncle Sam amounting to three and a half billion dollars because of what happened when they took that shot. By far the greatest number of the claims — two thirds of them — are for neurological damage, or even death, allegedly triggered by the flu shot.
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2021/12/video_the_covid_con_is_the_76_swine_flu_fiasco_on_steroids.html
Really... so how do dead people feel exactly?
Another perfect troll snares the fucking asshole rat!!!!! BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA111
Kavanaugh, seen as the swing vote, hammered away at the point that getting the Court out of abortion is the neutral, small-d democratic middle ground. That is very encouraging.
But one should never underestimate Chief Justice Roberts’ ability to find alternatives to an “all-or-nothing” choice; nor should one discount his ability to bring at least one Justice with him.
Powerline seems to agree with me.
https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2021/12/supreme-court-argument-suggests-shift-in-abortion-law-jurisprudence.php
A couple of things came out of the oral argument today:
1. The court seems to be rejecting the notion that abortion is a natural, unalienable right. In fact, they are leaning more toward the right of an unborn child to live.
2. They are most satisfied with the court being "neutral" on the issue of abortion leaving abortion policy to the states where it was originally formulated.
Roe will likely be overturn. The court has no appetite to set a new standard of viability which would be the compromise position.
Breyer,, Kagan, and Sotomayor would still dessent but it would be a more palatable position to the liberals.
If Kavanaugh and Roberts and one..a mixed bag.
Heartless .
"Blogger Decent, honest teller of truth said...
A woman's decision to have or not have an abortion does not endanger the health of others"
Really, so.the baby lives?
James, since you need 1, 2. , 3 , 4 or more shots to "feel safe", then go for it, that is the freedom you have.
My wife and I have those same freedoms to just say no to shots
"Powell, Yellen say they underestimated inflation and supply snarls"
Ok, two worthless eggheads.
Madam Secretary Peter Buttigieg told the poor to go and buy electric cars.
What happens in bumper to bumper traffic in a snow storm and it takes hours to get home?
Battery dying.
"“It is time to retire the word ‘transitory’ regarding inflation,” Powell
James, Roger and Denny.
No need to tell me I am right. I know I am. See I told ya so.
"“It is time to retire the word ‘transitory’ regarding inflation,” Powell
Blogger anonymous said...
Really... so how do dead people feel exactly?
Another perfect troll snares the fucking asshole rat!!!!! BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA111
Fatman learn to follow a thread that wasn’t rat, you stupid ass
By Michele Goodwin
Ms. Goodwin is a professor of law at the University of California, Irvine, and the author of “Policing the Womb: Invisible Women and the Criminalization of Motherhood.”
On Wednesday, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments on the constitutionality of a 15-week abortion ban in Mississippi that provides no exceptions in cases of rape or incest. What’s at stake in this case matters to the countless girls and women who have been raped — including those who, like me, were raped by a father, an uncle or another family member.
It was the early morning of my 10th birthday the first time that I was raped by my father. It would not be the last. The shock was so severe that I temporarily went blind before I began the fifth grade a few weeks later. By the time the school year began, my father had taken me to see a battery of doctors — a medical explanation would paper over the fact that the trauma caused by his sexual violence had caused my body to shut down.
The physiological suffering that I endured included severe migraines, hair loss and even gray hair — at 10 years old. While other girls may have longed for puberty, I loathed the idea of it. My body became a vessel that was not mine. It had been taken from me. I lived in fear of the night, and the footsteps outside my bedroom door.
I gravitated to closets — I would find the deepest corner, sit with a flashlight, read and rock myself. Only years later, while in therapy at 16, would I understand that my involuntary rocking when relating to these experiences was the manifestation of my stress and anxiety.
My father’s predations were hidden behind wealth, social status and his acting the part of a committed and attentive parent. I attended elite schools in New York City, studied ballet at a renowned academy and took private violin and tennis lessons. My father never missed a parent-teacher conference. However, that veneer of normalcy belied intimate family violence that began years before with his physical abuse of my mother. At times he was so violent that she was hospitalized.
At age 12, I was pregnant by my father, and I had an abortion. Before we got to the doctor’s office, I had no idea that I was pregnant. My father lied about my age and the circumstance of my pregnancy, informing the doctor that I was 15 and that I had been reckless with a boyfriend. My father shook his head, explaining to the doctor that he was doing all that he could as a single parent — my parents had divorced by this time — but that I was out of control. Both men seemed to convey contempt toward me. For many years, the shame of my father’s lie lingered with me — the stereotype embedded in the narrative of the risky, hypersexualized Black girl.
My shame was never about the abortion. I will forever be grateful that my pregnancy was terminated. I am fortunate that my body was spared an additional trauma imposed by my father — one that today would be forced by some state legislatures and courts. No child should be pressured or expected to carry a pregnancy and give birth or to feel remorse, guilt, doubt or unease about an abortion under any circumstances, let alone rape or incest.
As Justice Harry Blackmun recognized in his majority opinion in Roe v. Wade in 1973, the barriers to a decent life are enormous when there is an unwanted pregnancy; for many, they are insurmountable.
Post a Comment