Wednesday, April 20, 2022

This is an interesting read because I rarely find someone that I can almost find no agreement with?

Voting Rights: “There Is Reason to be Optimistic as Well as Alarmed” 

The Supreme Court is curtailing voting rights, as are many states. But the Brennan Center’s Michael Waldman sees reason for hope. Here’s why.

There is reason to be optimistic, as well as alarmed. Until quite recently, the trend has been toward enhanced democracy and expanded access to voting. What makes me optimistic is people showing they care about the health of democracy. People looking to undermine American democracy know that people care about it. For years, most consultants in the Democratic Party would whisper in the ears of their clients, “Oh, nobody cares about this stuff—it’s boring. It’s technical. It’s arcane.” We’ve learned that when you take away people’s right to vote or when you have an assault on our democracy as visible as the assault on the Capitol, people care.
What gives me hope is that if this remains a central burning political issue going forward, that can help transform the country.

Pretty much anyone who talks about the "big lie" and demands that allowing voter ID laws is akin to voter suppression is not someone I would ever agree with. But tossing in the idea that states in 2022 cannot make new laws because people in their legislation made questionable decisions a century ago just adds fuel to that fire. 

The USSC has been ruling in favor of states being able to run their elections for some time now. The idea that every change in a voter law is "racist" and part of "voter suppression" is rhetoric, not a valid argument. Moreover the idea that this is some form of rollback of progress flies in the face of reason, given we are the only major Democracy in the world (other than Russia) that does not have a national ID requirement to vote.

But I guess my biggest issue with this author and article is the implication that what is happening is unpopular. Every poll, survey, and analysis on this subject suggests that the American public (including blacks) support Voter ID laws.  By a 2-1 or even 3-1 margin American voters want our new laws to focus on security (not ease of voting). If given the choice between a law that makes it harder to both cheat and vote people ultimately prefer that than one that makes it easier to vote and cheat. 

That is the reality. Those who demand differently cannot be taken seriously. 


99 comments:

rrb said...



Scott, masks should be required to vote.

Scott.

Scott!

SCOTT!

MASKS SCOTT! TO VOTE SCOTT!


rrb said...


But I guess my biggest issue with this author and article is the implication that what is happening is unpopular. Every poll, survey, and analysis on this subject suggests that the American public (including blacks) support Voter ID laws. By a 2-1 or even 3-1 margin American voters want our new laws to focus on security (not ease of voting). If given the choice between a law that makes it harder to both cheat and vote people ultimately prefer that than one that makes it easier to vote and cheat.

That is the reality. Those who demand differently cannot be taken seriously.



It's the Brennan Center for chrissakes. An assclown emporium of Marxist, leftist lawyers I wouldn't trust to do a fucking real estate closing.

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

Right wing propaganda in Florida.

Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) “signed a bill that makes it harder for faculty at state universities to retain tenure, framing the legislation as another way that he and the Legislature are working to prevent educators from bringing their political views into the classroom.

rrb said...


Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) “signed a bill that makes it harder for faculty at state universities to retain tenure, framing the legislation as another way that he and the Legislature are working to prevent educators from bringing their political views into the classroom.


Excellent. Tenure at every level should be eliminated. It exists to protect those who should be fired.

Competent educators don't require tenure.

Those who can, do.

Those who can't, teach.

Those who REALLY can't, teach CRT and are GROOMERS.




Anonymous said...

This, IF TRUE.

Is an amazing Victory .

"Legislature are working to prevent educators from bringing their political views into the classroom."

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

We had the most secure election in 2020.


These laws are carefully designed to reduce turnout in minority districts.

They are trying again to reverse the Reconstruction act and the civil rights legislation of the 60s.

It started under Richard Nixon.

After Roosevelt years, every Southern state was Democratic. Dixiecrats opposed the civil rights legislation, even many Republicans supported LBJ.

Our Federal system gives the states voting regulations.



Anonymous said...

Biden needs electric so pour "$6 Billion" going to OLD nuclear plants to keep them running.

Anonymous said...

Roger, did your make believe soon to be 3rd wife take the news that you can't have the Fake Wedding because you are penniless and fatally buried in debt?

May 7, 2022 , no money, no wedding.

Caliphate4vr said...

It started under Richard Nixon.

You’ve had your ass handed to you, so many times on this Southern Strategy LIE.

It’s boring Alky get new material

Jeez

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

What issues are you seeing in upcoming Supreme Court cases?

MW: There are lots of reason to worry that the Court will take a wrecking ball to what’s left of the Voting Rights Act over the next year. 

In 2013, the Court gutted Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act, or the “preclearance” section, which said that a state with a history of racial discrimination in voting had to get permission from the Justice Department or a federal court before changing their voting rules. In the Brnovich case last year, the Court gravely weakened Section 2, making it very hard to challenge new voter suppression laws. People said at least the part used to block racial gerrymanders was still standing.

In recent months, an appeals court blocked a racial gerrymander in Alabama, and the Supreme Court said to let the election go forward with a map that the federal judges had said was racially discriminatory. 

The other issue is a fringe legal theory that says only state legislatures have the power to make voting rules. Its proponents call it the “independent state legislature doctrine,” except it’s not a doctrine—no court has ever found it.

At least four justices seem to think it’s a pretty good idea. They point to the Constitution’s elections clause, which says the legislature sets the time, place, and manner of elections, but Congress can override that and set national rules. James Madison insisted that the Constitution include this clause because he was convinced that state legislatures were corrupt and would do what we now call “voter suppression” or “gerrymandering.”

These proponents now argue that because the clause uses the word legislature—by which the Constitution means “state”—only legislators, meaning people in ill-fitting suits under a dome, can have anything to do with elections.

It’s constitutional upside-down land, but there may be a big fight in front of the Supreme Court very soon.

The 2013 decision gutted the right to vote legislation of the 60s.


You really want a Confederacy style of government.

Except slavery.



rrb said...

Blogger The Real Halfbaked Soars Pundit said...

We had the most secure election in 2020.



And the Easter Bunny slid down the chimney of the room you share with the 5th Beatle last Sunday.




rrb said...



Do your part to fight on-line plagiarism, alky.

It's a scourge upon the inter-webs.

LOL.

https://washingtonmonthly.com/2022/04/18/voting-rights-there-is-reason-to-be-optimistic-as-well-as-alarmed/

rrb said...


You’ve had your ass handed to you, so many times on this Southern Strategy LIE.

It’s boring Alky get new material

Jeez



And this is exactly why I consider the alky to be in the grip of a serious mental illness.



Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

This section contains information I have been seeing in the last few months. Gerrymandering may get eliminated...

In recent months, an appeals court blocked a racial gerrymander in Alabama, and the Supreme Court said to let the election go forward with a map that the federal judges had said was racially discriminatory. 

The other issue is a fringe legal theory that says only state legislatures have the power to make voting rules. Its proponents call it the “independent state legislature doctrine,” except it’s not a doctrine—no court has ever found it.

At least four justices seem to think it’s a pretty good idea. They point to the Constitution’s elections clause, which says the legislature sets the time, place, and manner of elections, but Congress can override that and set national rules. James Madison insisted that the Constitution include this clause because he was convinced that state legislatures were corrupt and would do what we now call “voter suppression” or “gerrymandering.”


Chief Justice Roberts is not an ideological motivated Justice.

Even Kavanagh might break from right wing justices

Caliphate4vr said...

It’s constitutional upside-down land, but there may be a big fight in front of the Supreme Court very soon.

Tell the dumbass to familiarize himself/herself/itself with the 5th amendment

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

This section has some good news ��


The other issue is a fringe legal theory that says only state legislatures have the power to make voting rules. Its proponents call it the “independent state legislature doctrine,” except it’s not a doctrine—no court has ever found it.

At least four justices seem to think it’s a pretty good idea. They point to the Constitution’s elections clause, which says the legislature sets the time, place, and manner of elections, but Congress can override that and set national rules. James Madison insisted that the Constitution include this clause because he was convinced that state legislatures were corrupt and would do what we now call “voter suppression” or “gerrymandering.”

Anonymous said...

Bidenomics slowing quickly.

Existing home sales down sharply.

Joe is in consultation with the Eastern Bunny .

Anonymous said...

🤣Tell the dumbass to familiarize himself/herself/itself with the 5th amendment😃

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

Fox News said

This election cycle was the most secure ever, despite a surge in mail-invoting prompted by the coronavirus pandemic.

A joint statement issued on Thursday by the Elections Infrastructure Government Coordinating Council and the Election Infrastructure Sector Coordinating executive committees said this year’s election marked “the most secure in American history.”

“While we know there are many unfounded claims and opportunities for misinformation about the process of our elections, we can assure you we have the utmost confidence in the security and integrity of our elections, and you should too,” the statement read. “When you have questions, turn to elections officials as trusted voices as they administer elections.”

In regards to recounts and uncalled races, the committees said that it is not unusual for states to recount ballots during close elections – but added that there is no evidence any voting system “deleted or lost votes, changed votes, or was in any way compromised.”

PHILADELPHIA'S TOP GOP ELECTION OFFICIAL PUSHES BACK ON VOTER FRAUD CLAIMS

President Trump has yet to concede to President-elect Joe Biden, and has repeated unfounded claims about fraud and that the election was “rigged.” His campaign has launched a slew of lawsuits throughout different states challenging election processes.

Trump attempted to sow doubt about the security of the mail-in voting process in the run-up to Election Day, since an extraordinary number of absentee and mail-in ballots were expected.

But voter turnout also appears to have hit a multi-decade high.

With votes still being counted, turnout in the 2020 presidential election has already hit a 50-year high, exceeding the record set by the 2008 presidential election of Barack Obama.

As of Sunday, the tallied votes accounted for 62% of the eligible voting-age population in the U.S. That’s a 0.4 percentage point increase so far over the rate hit in 2008.

The sheer number of votes also set records, although that’s a less remarkable milestone given the country’s growing population. So far 148 million votes have been tallied, with Democrat Joe Biden winning more than 75 million — the highest number for a presidential candidate in history. Trump received more than 70 million — the highest total for a losing candidate.


rrb said...



Our Federal system gives the states voting regulations.


Okay alky, let's plow this ground again...

https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artI_S4_C1_1_1_1_1/

Electoral governance is quite clear, and much of it IS left to the states.

State authority to regulate the times, places, and manner of holding congressional elections has been described by the Court as embrac[ing] authority to provide a complete code for congressional elections ...; in short, to enact the numerous requirements as to procedure and safeguards which experience shows are necessary in order to enforce the fundamental rights involved.12 The Court has upheld a variety of state laws designed to ensure that elections—including federal elections – are fair and honest and orderly.13 But the Court distinguished state laws that go beyond protection of the integrity and regularity of the election process, and instead operate to disadvantage a particular class of candidates.14

And this has been your problem. Convincing the court that a particular class of candidates - or voters - are being disadvantaged.

This is probably the single biggest and most egregious false narrative promoted by the left these days.

You need to be able to PROVE that GOP voting legislation does harm a voter. You can't. Minorities HAVE ID, and they HAVE access to the internet.

So stop LYING.


Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/2020-election-secure-history-federal-security

Anonymous said...

Biden raiding The SPR has done What?

Diesel fuel is up 5 cents over last week.

rrb said...



PHILADELPHIA'S TOP GOP ELECTION OFFICIAL PUSHES BACK ON VOTER FRAUD CLAIMS

In the face of 120% voter turnout year-over-year.


LMAO.

If there's a more crooked and corrupt voting city in America, I don't know what it is. The massive 0linsky mural on the wall of one of the polling places was a nice touch.

Caliphate4vr said...

This is probably the single biggest and most egregious false narrative promoted by the left these days.

Why shouldn’t Massachusetts have been subject to the voting rights act, I distinctly remember some busing issues up there?

As Alky would say, “I saw it on TV”

Caliphate4vr said...

Blogger KansasDemocrat said...
Biden raiding The SPR has done What?

Diesel fuel is up 5 cents over last week.


Well when we are sending tankers full of sweet crude from the SPR to Europe, what would you expect?

rrb said...




On election night Fox News refused to call Florida for Trump with over 10% of the vote in while calling Arizona for Biden with less than 1% of the vote in.

Hence the backlash against Fox News and the surge in Newsmax viewership.

Oh, and a bunch of Fox clowns like Chris Stirewalt got shitcanned from Fox as a result.

Former Fox News political editor Chris Stirewalt recounted the “terrible feeling of humiliation” over getting fired by the network after he defended the Fox News decision desk’s early but accurate election night call for President Joe Biden to win Arizona, adding that it was “very challenging” to tell his kids he was suddenly kicked to the curb.

https://www.thedailybeast.com/ex-fox-news-editor-chris-stirewalt-recalls-humiliation-of-being-fired-over-election-night

Currently he's helping Jonah Goldberg run his 'Never-Trumper' grift over at 'The Dispatch.'



rrb said...




In other news, Jizzo didn't do her book report on Space.

How embarrassing.


Anonymous said...

"Well when we are sending tankers full of sweet crude from the SPR to Europe, what would you expect?" REV

I Expect constant failure by Biden/Harris .

They deliver.

Anonymous said...

"Jizzo didn't do her book report on Space." REV

YEP, She failed, again.

Easily beatable , IF she runs in 2024.

Anonymous said...

Bidenomics gets a vote of no confidence.

"IMF Slashes Economic Growth Forecasts".

Recession is here.

rrb said...

YEP, She failed, again.

Easily beatable , IF she runs in 2024.



You almost have to wonder if the RNC planted a mole on her speech writing team.

James's Fucking Daddy said...


Fox News Re-Hires Expert Who Called Arizona for Biden
Arnon Mishkin on election night 2020 (Screengrab)
By Eric Mack | Friday, 08 October 2021 11:14 AM

The orchestrator of Fox News' early call of Arizona in the last presidential election is coming back to run the network’s decision desk for the 2022 midterms and 2024 elections.

Fox News CEO Suzanne Scott told The Hollywood Reporter that Decision Desk Director Arnon Mishkin will be rehired to be in charge of upcoming election coverage.

Fox stirred outrage from its viewers when it called Arizona just minutes after polls closed on election night 2020, while still failing to call Florida for then-President Donald Trump, even though voting had closed almost two hours earlier.

Mishkin, a longtime Democrat operative who backed Hillary Clinton in 2016 and donated to Barack Obama’s presidential campaign,
quickly drew the ire of the Trump campaign for his Arizona decision.

Trump won Florida handily, but almost all major news outlets said Arizona was too close to call and waited for days before making the call for Joe Biden.

Political experts such as Dick Morris said Fox’s early call for Arizona was an attempt to squelch the view Trump could still win if recounts in states like Wisconsin and Georgia were successful.

Trump has long pointed to Fox News' Arizona call for Biden as a watershed moment on election night.

https://www.newsmax.com/politics/fox-news-arnon-mishkin-rehire-called-arizona/2021/10/08/id/1039712/

The deep state is very deep

be careful with Fox

rrb said...



Each speech more cringe-worthy than the last...


“Space. It affects us all and it connects us all.”


https://twitter.com/i/status/1516739220332683264

Anonymous said...

The Biden Begging is embarrassing
"White House quits asking Saudis for more oil after verbal dust-up with top official: reportThe Saudis have reportedly cancelled multiple meetings with Biden cabinet members"

Anonymous said...

Wow, RRB.

Jizzo sure fuck that speech up.

James's Fucking Daddy said...

rrb said...


Each speech more cringe-worthy than the last...


“Space. It affects us all and it connects us all.”


https://twitter.com/i/status/1516739220332683264



She is unrehabilitatable

though she is about the dems only 2024 "chance"

talk about a losing hand

unsuited 2 and 7 in Texas holdem

and unsuited for America

C.H. Truth said...

Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) “signed a bill that makes it harder for faculty at state universities to retain tenure, framing the legislation as another way that he and the Legislature are working to prevent educators from bringing their political views into the classroom.


good!

Why do you have a problem with preventing politics in our classrooms?

Shouldn't professors be teaching the subjects that they are paid to teach?

What is your issue, Roger?

C.H. Truth said...

We had the most secure election in 2020.

Sure... and your roommate is one of the Beatles.

Honest, decent, truthful Rev. said...

CH SAYS:
The idea that every change in a voter law
is "racist"
and part of "voter suppression"
is rhetoric,
not a valid argument.
___

I POINT OUT:
There was a time when
in large portions of our country
blacks simply could not legally vote,
by state
and/or county law.

To say
that
is NOT mere "rhetoric,"
but
it was absolutely racist,
IS A VALID ARGUMENT.

Honest, decent, truthful Rev. said...

Contrary to Ch,
there is NO way American history can be taught without mentioning politics and racism.

Try teaching about the Civil War without mentioning Republican opposition to racist slavery.

C.H. Truth said...

The other issue is a fringe legal theory that says only state legislatures have the power to make voting rules. Its proponents call it the “independent state legislature doctrine,” except it’s not a doctrine—no court has ever found it.

At least four justices seem to think it’s a pretty good idea. They point to the Constitution’s elections clause, which says the legislature sets the time, place, and manner of elections, but Congress can override that and set national rules. James Madison insisted that the Constitution include this clause because he was convinced that state legislatures were corrupt and would do what we now call “voter suppression” or “gerrymandering.”


What does this mean to you Roger...

In your own words....

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

This is another reason why you support him for President.

Florida's top LGBTQ organization is blasting GOP Governor Ron DeSantis after his Dept. of Health issued a statement labeled "guidance" Wednesday in opposition to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services' fact sheet on gender-affirming care for transgender and nonbinary people, including children and adolescents.

"Once again, the DeSantis Administration seeks to replace science and the safety of young people with political propaganda," Equality Florida said in a statement. "The Florida Department of Health has released non-binding guidance opposing science-backed health care resources for parents of transgender children."

"This guidance demonizes life-saving, medically-necessary care, and asserts that the government, not parents, knows best when it comes to health care for our children. And, once again, DeSantis wants the government to intrude into doctors’ offices to pander to extremists in service to his political ambitions. Parents should be deciding, in partnership with their child’s doctor, based on science, not politics, what is best for their children."

"Governor DeSantis’ runaway agenda of banning books, muzzling teachers, censoring history, and pushing government control is putting a handful of extremists in charge of every aspect of the lives of Floridians and is making the state less safe for LGBTQ families, especially transgender children. "

Earlier Wednesday, in its statement, the Florida Dept. of Health went as far back as 2015 to find a study, in Europe, to support its claims opposing gender-affirming care for children.

The Biden administration's fact sheet importantly warns: "The Trevor Project’s 2021 National Survey on LGBTQ Youth Mental Health found that 52 percent of LGBTQ youth seriously considered attempting suicide in the past year." The Florida Dept. of Health's guidance does not even mention the risk of suicide.

The Florida Dept. of Health is run by DeSantis' hand-picked Surgeon General, Dr. Joseph Ladapo, who has been discredited by his own supervisor from his time as a physician in California, by his apparently false claims about his background, and by his appearance in an anti-vaxx video alongside a physician commonly referred to as the "Demon Sperm Doctor."

÷


Sexual discrimination and people who don't agree with them.


C.H. Truth said...

Reverend....

Pointing out that blacks were once not able to vote has no logical bearing on Voter ID laws.

I am curious as to what intellectual gymnastics you are using to tie the two together?


Seems like rhetoric rather than a valid argument? Do you actually understand the difference?

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

Opposing the truth about America ���� is discrimination


People who know about our dark past tend to vote for Democrats.

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

Madison knew that state legislatures were corrupt and would do what we now call “voter suppression” or “gerrymandering

And Congress can override that and set national rules. 

And the court will agree ��

Honest, decent, truthful Rev. said...

The other issue is a fringe legal theory that says only state legislatures have the power to make voting rules.

Its proponents call it the “independent state legislature doctrine,” except it’s not a doctrine—no court has ever found it.

At least four justices seem to think it’s a pretty good idea. They point to the Constitution’s elections clause, which says the legislature sets the time, place, and manner of elections, but Congress can override that and set national rules.

What does this mean to you Roger...
In your own words....

In MY own words,
states could frame laws in such a way that electors would not be bound to follow the will of a majority of the voters, but could choose electors who would represent the will of a minority of the voters.

Honest, decent, truthful Rev. said...

Ch, why is it that when I, a white male, vote here in Illinois, I never have to show a drivers' license, a passport, or a birth certificate, or any other form of id?

I never did, unless perhaps the first time I ever voted here -- I really can't remember.

My signature now suffices.

Why should a law suddenly be passed requiring me now to supply additional identification,
if not to suppress the black vote?

Honest, decent, truthful Rev. said...

I have been voting here a quarter of a century.

Caliphate4vr said...

states could frame laws in such a way that electors would not be bound to follow the will of a majority of the voters, but could choose electors who would represent the will of a minority of the voters.

Wow, just wow

As of 2020, there are 17 states that do not legally require their electors to vote in accordance with the state's popular vote: Arkansas, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Missouri, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Dakota, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Texas, West Virginia.

In addition, another 16 states have no mechanism in place to penalize or replace an elector who votes against the state's popular vote: Alabama, Alaska, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Hawaii, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Mississippi, Ohio, Oregon, Tennessee, Vermont, Virginia, Wyoming. The District of Columbia also has no mechanism in place.

https://beyond.britannica.com/which-states-do-not-require-electors-to-vote-with-popular-vote

Stick to copying and pasting stupid

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

Pence’s words to Trump could be significant as congressional and criminal probes of Jan. 6 advance. A federal judge has concluded that Trump “more likely than not” criminally conspired to obstruct Congress’ proceedings to finalize Biden’s victory. He described Trump’s pressure campaign against Pence as “a coup in search of a legal theory.” The select committee has also argued that Trump committed multiple crimes as he leaned on Pence to subvert the election.

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

The John Lewis legislation would almost eliminate gerrymandering.

And reverse the big lie


Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

The bill would restore much-needed protections against discrimination targeting voters of color.

Andrew Garber

PUBLISHED: January 13, 2022

Ensure Every American Can VoteVote SuppressionVoting Reform

Spencer Platt/Getty

On Thursday, the House passed an omni­bus voting rights bill that included the John R. Lewis Voting Rights Advance­ment Act, an effort to restore and revital­ize the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (VRA). The bill is now before the Senate, where despite bipar­tisan support it faces an uncer­tain future due to the fili­buster.

The VRA was the most success­ful civil rights legis­la­tion in our coun­try’s history until the Supreme Court gutted the law in Shelby County v. Holder in 2013. The Court further weakened the law’s protec­tions against voting discrim­in­a­tion in another case in 2022 in Brnovich v. Demo­cratic National Commit­tee.

Now, we are in the midst of a crisis. The nation faces a wave of voting restric­tions and redis­trict­ing abuses, both of which often target communit­ies of color. We need a full-strength Voting Rights Act to prevent this suppres­sion from happen­ing and root it out quickly where it does.

The John R. Lewis Voting Rights Advance­ment Act would restore the law to full strength, in part by once again requir­ing states with histor­ies of voter discrim­in­a­tion to receive approval from the Depart­ment of Justice or a federal court before enact­ing voting changes. Nonethe­less, Repub­lic­ans in Congress and their allies in the states oppose it. These oppon­ents have now made their case in several congres­sional hear­ings, includ­ing an Octo­ber 6, 2021, hear­ing before the Senate Judi­ciary Commit­tee.

They do not — and cannot — offer reasoned explan­a­tions for why the law’s protec­tions are any less import­ant now than they were in 2006, when it was reau­thor­ized with over­whelm­ing bipar­tisan support in Congress. Instead, they offer a combin­a­tion of misin­form­a­tion and a regur­git­a­tion of the criti­cisms made against the Voting Rights Act in 1965. Their claims are wrong, and many rely on blatantly false state­ments.

MYTH: The bill is a federal takeover of elec­tions

Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) called the John Lewis Voting Rights Act “a power grab” designed to let “unelec­ted bureau­crats . . . strike down . . . laws enacted by demo­crat­ic­ally elec­ted legis­latures in the states.” By his telling, “one unelec­ted bureau­crat” can “say to hell with demo­cracy” and strike down laws on a whim.

This argu­ment is incor­rect for three reas­ons. First, the DOJ would play the same role under the John Lewis Voting Rights Act that it played so success­fully for almost five decades under the Voting Rights Act. Criti­ciz­ing the DOJ’s author­ity under the bill is just a revival of an argu­ment made against the original Voting Rights Act.

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

Scott sadly is a Trumper conspiracy theorist who believes the 2020 election was stolen by a planetary cabal that manipulated voting machines. 

In New York and Georgia.

Honest, decent, truthful Rev. said...

no, even Scott can't believe THAT!....

Alex Jones Ch's source said...

Some seniors spend their twilight years in their own homes. Like Roger

Many move into a nursing home.

And a select few continue to pull the levers of power debasing the most powerful country in the world in order to protect and add to their ill-gotten fortunes.

The youngest member of Democratic leadership is 71-year-old Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer of New York, while 88-year-old Republican Sen. Chuck Grassley of Iowa is running again to hold on to his seat.

The longest-serving Senator, 88 year old California Senator Diane Feinstein, is worth well over a billion dollars that includes 96 million of her own fortune combined with her late husband’s assets, acquired from a senator’s base salary of approximately $174,000.

Like her crony Pelosi, Feinstein has opened the door to contracts for her husband’s company through the years related to one federal crisis after another.

But aside from the fleecing of America, Feinstein and Pelosi’s mental fitness has frequently come into question.

Without term limits or age limits, we are allowing dementia to rule over our prescient present and the impending New World Order future.

The American system has become a Country Club of decrepit scamming millionaire globalist pawns lording over neglected younger generations that are left to pick up the pieces after the old establishment releases it from the grip of their corpses.

Infowars lollipop ��

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

Yes he does because he spent hours on the New York district..

Honest, decent, truthful Rev. said...

Re: 2:20
List all the states that have electorially NOT voted in accordance with their state's popular vote.

The framers of our Constituion wished to leave open the possibility that the majority might choose someone so obviously wrong for the position of President that the electors could go against the popular vote.

Only in the case of Trump should that have been done.

Honest, decent, truthful Rev. said...

Some elements of the Electoral College, such as the indirect vote through intermediaries, were hotly debated at the 1787 Constitutional Convention. It was eventually justified in part as a stopgap to potentially reverse the vote if the people elected a criminal, traitor, or similar kind of heinous person. The Founders wanted to empower democratic elements in the American system, but they feared a kind of pure, unrestrained democracy that had brought down great republics of the past.

Honest, decent, truthful Rev. said...

If Trump had been required to release his tax returns (as he earlier promised he would do while campaigning), could he legitimately have been not only impeached but also found guilty?

James's Fucking Daddy said...


It was eventually justified in part as a stopgap to potentially reverse the vote if the people elected a criminal, traitor, or similar kind of heinous person.


Now if we only could figure out who "the big guy" is

and all those middle-of-the-night shenanigans



Honest, decent, truthful Rev. said...

"...the big guy..."
Sounds like Trump.

Honest, decent, truthful Rev. said...

We have Biden's tax returns.
Where are Trump's?

James's Fucking Daddy said...

Lou Dobbs
https://twitter.com/LouDobbs/status/1515449468069494785


Marxist Dems Stole more than the 2020 Election, they stole most of Trump's Presidency: Durham says CIA found data alleging Trump-Russia connection not 'technically plausible,' was 'user created'


James's Fucking Daddy said...


Honest, decent, truthful Rev. said...
"...the big guy..."
Sounds like Trump.

We have Biden's tax returns.
Where are Trump's




How come Biden doesn't have any of "the big guy's" income listed on his tax return?

Certainly Hunter wasn't paying Trump?


ROFLMFAO !!!

Caliphate4vr said...

Blogger Honest, decent, truthful Rev. said...
Re: 2:20
List all the states that have electorially NOT voted in accordance with their state's popular vote.


IOW you had no idea about the subject you spoke on AS ALWAYS and now want to move the goal posts. So something that’s never been an issue will suddenly become an issue. You just aren’t bright

Fuck you, pedo

LOL

C.H. Truth said...

states could frame laws in such a way that electors would not be bound to follow the will of a majority of the voters, but could choose electors who would represent the will of a minority of the voters.

Well not sure that you understood the question. But funny how you go directly to some State wanting to represent the will of the Minority. Pretty grim of you.


At issue is what is called the Elections Clause that allows states to create their own laws regarding voting:

"The Elections Clause is the primary source of constitutional authority to regulate elections for the U.S. House of Representatives and U.S. Senate. The Clause directs and empowers states to determine the “Times, Places, and Manner” of congressional elections, subject to Congress’s authority to “make or alter” state regulations. It grants each level of government the authority to enact a complete code for such elections, including rules concerning public notices, voter registration, voter protection, fraud prevention, vote counting, and determination of election results. Whenever a state enacts a law relating to a congressional election, it is exercising power under the Elections Clause;"


the article in question suggests that no such authority actually exists, yet the USSC has used the election clause and even explained the election clause. Yet certain people just pretend it doesn't exist... and apparently people like Roger any yourself take them at their word.

Paranoia?

C.H. Truth said...

Ch, why is it that when I, a white male, vote here in Illinois, I never have to show a drivers' license, a passport, or a birth certificate, or any other form of id?

We've discussed this before.

But it's pretty simple. You live in one of the 15 states or so that do not require a voter ID. If you moved next door to Indiana, Wisconsin, Missouri or Iowa, you would have to have ID to vote. If you moved to Indiana or Wisconsin you would need a picture ID.

Why is this so difficult for you to understand?

The majority of the country requires ID to vote, including my now home state of Washington.

C.H. Truth said...

Scott sadly is a Trumper conspiracy theorist who believes the 2020 election was stolen by a planetary cabal that manipulated voting machines.

In New York and Georgia.


Seriously?

and you think you are smart?

C.H. Truth said...


Yes he does because he spent hours on the New York district..


A) What is the "New York District"

B) Nobody suggested New York was a problem since Biden won by 22 percent.

C) I never spent a second on New York. Georgia, Arizona, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania... sure. Spent lots of time on those states and the issues I addressed were 95% statistical.

Honest, decent, truthful Rev. said...

Russia Cracks Down on Western Social Media
April 20, 2022 at 4:00 pm EDT By Taegan Goddard 46 Comments

“The Kremlin is waging a new influence campaign: persuading Russians to quit Western social-media platforms,”
the Wall Street Journal reports.

“As part of an expansive effort to control the narrative about its invasion of Ukraine, the Kremlin is pushing Russians to embrace homegrown alternatives instead. Russian authorities have put up firewalls around several Western social-media platforms and are threatening more.

"Now they have to convince Russians used to the freedoms of YouTube and Instagram that censored domestic social networks can deliver moneymaking opportunities and equally large audiences. And that they aren’t just cheap knockoffs.”

James's Fucking Daddy said...


I see the POS "pastor" has no answers

just more distraction from the Gospel According to Goddard

James's Fucking Daddy said...

Catturd ™
https://twitter.com/catturd2/status/1515868334683684867

Quinnipiac …

Joe Biden’s approval rating … 33%

Joe Biden approval rating 18-35 years old … 21%

Hispanic approval rating …26%

I’d be deflecting too if I were you. 😂😂😂


James's Fucking Daddy said...

Hans Mahncke
https://twitter.com/HansMahncke/status/1515360261351297029

Durham: CIA "concluded in early 2017 that the Russian Bank-1 data and Russian Phone Provider-1 data was not “technically plausible,” did not “withstand technical scrutiny,” “contained gaps,” “conflicted with [itself]”

They never said a word, allowing the country to be destroyed.



CIA once again proven to be partisan hacks

Caliphate4vr said...

James's Fucking Daddy said...

I see the POS "pastor" has no answers

just more distraction from the Gospel According to Goddard


That happens every time he tries to post his own “thoughts”, every time

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

A left wing view...

“1

GIVE$

Joe Biden: Stop Telling People You're on Their Side and Start Showing Them You Are

Breaking the stranglehold that monopolistic corporations have on our economy and our people is not a job for the politically meek.

JIM HIGHTOWER

April 20, 2022 by Creators.com

For years, as ever-bigger corporate combines grabbed ever-bigger chunks of market power, America's political, media and academic establishment scoffed at critics, drowning them out with jolly rounds of "Zip-a-Dee-Doo-Dah." But the concentration of corporate power can no longer be dismissed, for it's all too real. It wreaks real havoc on entire economic sectors, workaday families, communities and our nation's essential uniting value of fairness. Pontificators of the status quo can coo all the free-enterprise platitudes they want, but a rising grassroots majority (including supposedly conservative farmers and ranchers) is experiencing corporate repression firsthand. Those families are doing their own kitchen-table tabulations and realizing that the game has been deliberately rigged against them. A mad-as-hell moment is percolating at the grassroots.

The key to winning is not by schmoozing McConnell and Manchin, but by going into the countryside and rallying the majority of people fed up with corporate arrogance and abuse.

Biden at least recognizes this, seems to feel people's pain and anger, and (unlike other recent Democratic presidents) has put it on his national agenda: "Capitalism without competition isn't capitalism," he recently said, "it's exploitation." All right, then: You go, Joe!

But he hasn't. Yes, he's made some good reform proposals, appointed a couple of top-notch antitrust regulators, issued a few useful procedural changes, held some closed-door White House meetings on the topic, and been willing to call out a few of the worst gougers and profiteers. That's good. But wholly inadequate. It's all inside-the-Beltway stuff, and even though Biden has been a consummate, 48-year inside player who promised that his collegial skills would let him "get things done," the people being run over just see more political talk without action. Supermarket beef prices still rise, cattle prices fall, meatpacker power and profits soar, and grassroots people keep getting bulled. In fairness, Biden has a heavy load: sour old Sen. Mitch McConnell, the Manchin-Sinema blob, the monopoly lobby, milquetoast Democrats, a clueless media corps, etc. But don't whine; get out of Washington!

Breaking the stranglehold that monopolistic corporations have on our economy and our people is not a job for the politically meek.

Anonymous said...

Joe Biden: Stop Telling People You're on Their Side and Start Showing Them You Are.

He has.

High interest rates
High food cost and shortages
High gas prices , no plan
He has show us enough

30 Trillion Debt.

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

Teddy Roosevelt is on Mount Rushmore because he did this.



Breaking the stranglehold that monopolistic corporations have on our economy and our people is not a job for the politically meek.

Standard Oil owned everything.



Anonymous said...

Joe announced a big speech a week ago to "rally the people" , he gave that speech .

29 people showed and one Easter Bunny with his meds.

C.H. Truth said...

You remember back when there was the Crusades and Christian Knights used to run around slaughtering innocent people, pillaging villages, and selling survivors into slavery.

As a so called Christian man of the cloth, I guess we need to judge the Reverend by the past sins of his religion... He is by nature a killer of innocent people and needs to be judged as much.

Since that is is argument regarding states and voting laws?

rrb said...



As a so called Christian man of the cloth, I guess we need to judge the Reverend by the past sins of his religion... He is by nature a killer of innocent people and needs to be judged as much.

Since that is is argument regarding states and voting laws?



Works for me.

I personally have never known a 'Reverend' to be such a prolific liar, or to walk around breaking many of the 10 Commandments every single day.



rrb said...



Breaking the stranglehold that monopolistic corporations have on our economy and our people is not a job for the politically meek.

Show us a single "monopoly" that our anti-trust laws have failed to acknowledge and prosecute, alky.

And no, the ignorant bullshit being spewed by Fauxcohantas doesn't count.

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

4/18/2022
It's Not the First Time Conservatives Have Feuded With Disney over LGBTQ IssuesBreaking News
tags: Florida, Disney, LGBTQ history, Ron DeSantis



Disney has landed in the culture war crosshairs. Conservative activists and politicians have set their sights on the entertainment giant, urging boycotts of theme parks and media and threatening business operations in response to the company’s stance on LGBTQ issues.

It’s not the first time that the entertainment giant has found itself in this position. And if the past repeats itself, the bark will likely be worse than the bite.

After Disney spoke out against the Parental Rights in Education law that prohibits discussion of sexual orientation and gender identity in lower elementary school grades, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) attacked the company, saying it “crossed the line” with its criticism. Lawmakers at the state and national level have taken aim at the company’s unique tax status in Florida, home to its largest theme park, and its Mickey Mouse copyright.

Pushback from conservatives escalated when internal Disney videos obtained by an activist showed employees discussing efforts to add more representation of LGBTQ+ characters.

Adding fuel to the fireworks: the rediscovery by conservatives that announcements before pyrotechnic shows no longer addressed visitors as “Ladies and Gentlemen, Boys and Girls” but rather “Dreamers of all ages.” Several media outlets reported last summer that the change was part of a diversity effort.

In recent weeks, a chorus has joined DeSantis in criticizing the company, which brings millions of visitors to its four theme parks and more than two dozen resorts in the state each year. Texas Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick (R) urged people to cancel their trips to the parks in a campaign update headlined “I AM DONE WITH DISNEY!” Protests have formed around Disney properties in California and Florida, including one Saturday at Disney World in Orlando that featured a costumed mouse wearing a red “Make America Great Again” hat.

....

The most famous backlash came in the late 1990s, when the Southern Baptist Convention voted to boycott Disney over LGBT issues, including Ellen DeGeneres coming out as a lesbian on her ABC show, the annual “Gay Days” event at Disney World organized by outsiders and the company’s extension of health benefits to partners of LGBTQ workers.

In 1997, the first year of the boycott and part of Disney World’s 25th anniversary celebration, attendance at the signature Magic Kingdom park grew by 3 million, the South Florida Sun-Sentinel reported. Combined attendance at the Florida parks hit records through 2000, according to an Orlando Sentinel report on industry estimates. The boycott ended in 2005

rrb said...



In 1997, the first year of the boycott and part of Disney World’s 25th anniversary celebration, attendance at the signature Magic Kingdom park grew by 3 million, the South Florida Sun-Sentinel reported. Combined attendance at the Florida parks hit records through 2000, according to an Orlando Sentinel report on industry estimates. The boycott ended in 2005


Wow alky, that ancient history must be important...

...to some looney toons asshole locked down in the Cuckoo's Nest.

Meanwhile, the left has rushed to Disney's defense so the BILLION DOLLAR CORPORATION can keep it's "special arrangement" that Death-Santis is taking away.

Disney professionally grooms pre-pubescent children for guys like the pederast 'pastor.' And you cheer that behavior making you a groomer by proxy.



Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

rrb knows nothing about any..

had changed significantly in recent decades. The population of the United States had almost doubled from 1870 to 1900 as immigrants came to U.S. cities to work in the country's burgeoning factories. As the United States became increasingly urban and industrial, it acquired many of the attributes common to industrial nations—overcrowded cities, poor working conditions, great economic disparity, and the political dominance of big business. At the turn of the twentieth century, Americans had begun to look for ways to address some of these problems. As chief executive, Roosevelt felt empowered by the people to help ensure social justice and economic opportunity through government regulation. He was not a radical, however; TR believed that big business was a natural part of a maturing economy and, therefore, saw no reason to abolish it. He never suggested fundamentally altering American society or the economy to address various economic and social ills. In fact, he often stated that there must be reform in order to stave off socialism; if government did not act, the people would turn to more extreme measures to seek remedies. In addition, TR was a politician who understood the need to compromise in order to implement his ideas. Coming into office following William McKinley's assassination, Roosevelt pledged to maintain the fallen President's policies so as not to upset the nation in a time of mourning. And even when he began to chart his own course, Roosevelt knew that he had to work with congressional Republicans to get the G.O.P. nomination for President in 1904.

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

The Great Regulator

One of Roosevelt's central beliefs was that the government had the right to regulate big business to protect the welfare of society. However, this idea was relatively untested. Although Congress had passed the Sherman Antitrust Act in 1890, former Presidents had only used it sparingly. So when the Department of Justice filed suit in early 1902 against the Northern Securities Company, it sent shockwaves through the business community. The suit alarmed the business community, which had hoped that Roosevelt would follow precedent and maintain a "hands-off" approach to the market economy. At issue was the claim that the Northern Securities Company—a giant railroad combination created by a syndicate of wealthy industrialists and financiers led by J. P. Morgan—violated the Sherman Antitrust Act because it was a monopoly. In 1904, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of the government and ordered the company dismantled. The high court's action was a major victory for the administration and put the business community on notice that although this was a Republican administration, it would not give business free rein to operate without regard for the public welfare.

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

Regulated capitalism has built the greatest nation on earth.

Lydia said...

Roger used to wear dirty underwear with icky dark skid mark stains.

rrb said...

Blogger The Real Halfbaked Soars Pundit said...

Regulated capitalism has built the greatest nation on earth.



Thanks for proving the fact that you're intellectually incapable of answering my very simple question, alky.

Don't try to school me on TR, drunkard. A very dog-eared copy of his biography by H.W. Brands sits in my library.

rrb said...


And of course, he’s incapable of answering just spews more bullshit spams


At this point he's just a blithering idiot.

Like I've said before, if Scott ever shut down this blog the alky would be dead in 60 days.

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

Perhaps most significantly, in many developed nations late-20th Century capitalism has contributed to a significant gap between the wealth of the richest and poorest people, as measured by the Gini Index. And in some countries, that gap is growing ever-wider. It's particularly stark in the US, where the poorest individuals have seen no real income growth since 1980, while the ultra-rich at the top have seen their income grow by around 6% per year. The richest billionaires in the world are almost all based in the US, and have amassed staggering fortunes, while at the same time the median US household income has risen only modestly since the turn of the century. Top down economics.

rrb said...

Anonymous Lydia said...

Roger used to wear dirty underwear with icky dark skid mark stains.


Used to?

rrb said...



Alky, you steal content with impunity just like all leftists desire to steal the fruits of the labor of others via taxation and outright confiscation.

People like you are pure scum, and you soil our nation with your presence.

Lydia said...

Roger rarely brushed his teeth and had thick deformed yellow toenails.

rrb said...

Smooth move, asshole:

Tax season is always a stressful time, especially for working families. This year, however, it proved more stressful than usual.

Over the last few weeks, many Americans came to the shocking realization that instead of getting a refund – a refund they’d been counting on to offset the last 12 months of rising prices – they would owe money to the federal government. Why? Because President Joe Biden’s now-expired government child allowance disrupted a longstanding tax benefit.

For the year of 2021, President Biden replaced the child tax credit for working parents with a government child allowance for every parent, including those not working. The benefit was intended to provide monthly payments for every child in a residence. But because of delays and incompetence, those payments did not begin until July. The remainder of the payments were left to be claimed when families filed their annual tax returns.


https://realclearflorida.com/articles/2022/04/20/bidens_child_allowance_made_tax_season_worse_828012.html


Stupid son of a bitch.


Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Anonymous said...

Alky and James, both can't answer a question IN Thier TOPIC.


CDC instructed DOJ to appeal the Judges Ruling.

CDC, is not giving up Power.

Anonymous said...

Florida is about to make Disney to Pay their fair Share.

The left must be in favor in this move.

Caliphate4vr said...

America’s paper of record

10 Changes DeSantis Has Ordered For Disney World

Florida legislature has revoked Disney's self-governing status which means that some bold new changes are on the way. Disneyland in California will remain a popular site for human trafficking but the Walt Disney World in Orlando, FL is going to experience a dramatic overhaul.

Take a look at these exciting changes on the way:

1) The Hall of Presidents will just have 46 animatronic Donald Trumps: They are the greatest robots, maybe ever. Everyone says so.

2) Chip and Dale will now reside in separate trees: We can't let our children be corrupted by cartoon characters having too close of a relationship.

3) Avatar land will be turned into an IP someone actually cares about like Krull: Wield a sentient weapon and save the world!

4) Only the original Star Wars trilogy may be spoken of: The prequel trilogy is too perfect to corrupt with human speech.

5) The only country featured in Epcot will be AMERICA: America is like a highlight reel of all the best countries anyway.

6) All Disney princesses to be replaced with Melania Trump: Finally, real diversity!

7) Weird Disney adults who come without kids wil be banned: Yessss!!!

8) Human trafficking is strongly discouraged: And no more kids on leashes, you weirdos!

9) It's A Small World attraction to be dismantled by tactical nuke: The area will be sealed off for thirty years.

10) Johnny Depp's character will no longer wear eye shadow on the Pirates ride: Will also incorporate ex-wife Amber Heard in a redesigned auction scene.

Caliphate4vr said...

Top men, top men. We’re in the very best of hands

US Capitol Police issues alert to evacuate buildings due to “tracking an aircraft that poses a probable threat to the Capitol complex”.

Police message to evacuate the Capitol complex:

• Evacuate the U.S. Capitol, Capitol Visitor Center, Hart, Dirksen, Russell, Cannon, Longworth,
Rayburn, Library of Congress (Jefferson, Madison and Adams) and U.S. Botanic Garden
(Administrative and Conservatory) buildings

• If you are on the Senate side of the Capitol or eve, in the Hart, Dirksen, or Russell buildings: move
NORTH towards Union Station to the Aircraft Intrusion Assembly Area in the parks just prior to
Columbus Circle NE. DO NOT STOP at your primary assembly area.

• If you are on the House side of the Capitol or eve, in the Cannon, Longworth, Rayburn or
U.S. Botanic Garden (Administrative and Conservatory) buildings: move SOUTH towards Garfield
Park. DO NOT STOP at your primary assembly area.

• If you are in the Library of Congress (Jefferson, Madison, and Adams) buildings: move SOUTH
towards Folger and Providence Parks. DO NOT STOP at your primary assembly area.

• If you are in Ford, O’Neill, Postal Square, the Senate Page Dorm/School at Webster Hall, the
Senate Child Care Center, or LOC Daycare Center, remain indoors.

• Updates will be provided

UPDATE Police say ‘no threat’ at US Capitol after evacuation. Evacuation at the U.S. Capitol caused by U.S. Army team skydiving into stadium for the Washington Nationals.


LOL