Saturday, April 9, 2022

WaPo and others react to Elon Musk being added to the Twitter board of directors?

Hot take in the Bezos-owned WaPo about need to prevent rich people from controlling media cracks up Elon Musk
“Twitter made strides to remove hate and harassment and to give users more control over how they share their opinions… It added features that let users limit who could reply to their tweets, created labels for misleading content and banned President Donald Trump’s account. After all that, bringing Musk onto the board seems like a big step backward,” Pao wrote. “He can bend the company toward his preferences, removing reasonable policies on hateful speech and urging people who are harassed to have thicker skins.”
She continued, “Musk’s appointment to Twitter’s board shows that we need regulation of social-media platforms to prevent rich people from controlling our channels of communication. For starters, we need consistent definitions of harassment and of content that violates personal privacy. Most companies, I suspect, would welcome such regulations… If platforms continue to push for growth at all costs — without such regulations — people will continue to be harmed. The people harmed will disproportionately be those who have been harmed for centuries — women and members of marginalized racial and ethnic groups. The people who benefit from unrestricted amplification of their views will also be the same people who have benefited from that privilege for centuries.” 
So the left is having a complete meltdown over the fact that Elon Musk bought up three billion worth of Twitter and now owns over three times the controlling interest of the last President and CEO of Twitter. 

The problem is that while the left loves their own rich people (Zuckerberg, Dorsey, etc) controlling these platforms because they are liberals and love to censor conservative political views and even inconvenient facts (Hunter Biden's laptop, Covid studies that defied CDC opinion, etc), they are worried that Elon Musk could become involved enough to (gasp) make the platform open again for all political viewpoints, rather than just the politically correct twitter approved viewpoints. 

As someone who experienced a loss of about 40% of my twitter following after the election of Joe Biden and being able to look at the suspended accounts that were eventually banned, literally none of the hundreds I probably looked at had anything harassing or hateful. Nearly all of them were suspended and eventually banned for pushing (what we now know are being proved to be factual) claims of election manipulation and in some cases out and out fraud. Twitter decided (as did much of the MSM) that people who questioned the election were part of QAnon and therefore they needed to be silenced.

To begin with there is a large difference between someone who believes that Democrats are closet cannibals and those who feel that the 2020 election was riddled with cheating and fraud. The former concept sports less than 1% of the entire population, while the latter is over half the American population according to a March 2022 poll. You cannot choose to declare a majority opinion (that has facts, stats, and even court rulings that back it) disinformation, just because the members of the Twitter fact-checking community has their heads up their own asses. 

The reality is that when your own media is supportive of censoring political opinions that they do not agree with, then you no longer have a media. You have a media state that wants to control information. The problem is that in 2022 without "full control" you literally have "no control" because people will just ignore you. While it is hard to "ignore" platforms like twitter or facebook, it can be done as it pertains to politics. When you decide to segregate your opinions (which is all that censoring actually does) then you end up with opposing groups of people who are getting entirely different opposing news and opinions and there is no place for anyone to come together. 

Coming together and discussing (or even arguing emotionally) charged political issues is what Twitter used to be about. Now it is about protecting the crybaby snowflake liberals who feel threatened and harrassed by the mere inclusion of any opposing opinions. Sorry crybaby snowflakes, but perhaps it is you that needs to go away and find your own safe place. Leave public forums to the public.

63 comments:

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

Private companies have the right to post what they want.

"Some people sure are nervous at the thought of losing their ability to flag & purge truths by calling it “misinformation” in order to protect preferred narratives."

____
Because if they implement the fairness doctrine on privately owned businesses, the first amendment is at risk.

I am an absolustic supporter of the first amendment.

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

You have become a part of QAnon and therefore they needed to be silenced by Twitter if they decided that you are shouting fire in a movie theater.


Honest, decent, truthful Rev. said...

Question for CH:

Are you in favor of having given Alex Jones unrestrained ability widely to spread his lies about the parents and the situation of the Sandy Hook massacre?

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

Lmao

Toggle navigation

 

Meme of the Day: Kamala Harris in a UPS truck

 

Posted at 7:39 pm on April 08, 2022 by Greg Pollowitz

 Share

 

 Tweet

In response to conservative Amber Athey getting fired from her radio gig at WMAL DC by Cumulus Media after she joked that Vice President Kamala Harris’ brown suit that she wore to the State of the Union looked like a UPS uniform. . .

ADVERTISEMENT

. . .the popular meme account @PapiTrumpo posted this hilarious video of the vice president driving a UPS truck. Have a watch:

Now, compare this to the STOU outfit. You be the judge.

From the White House Flickr account:

Oh, and *please* stop sending it to Amber. She’s seen it LOL:

ADVERTISEMENT

***

Related:

Jen Psaki tells Peter Doocy why it was OK that Kamala Harris broke CDC guidelines yesterday AND today

WTAF?! Conservative station WMAL DC bows to the mob, cancels conservative host Amber Athey over so-called ‘racist’ Kamala Harris joke

GRRL BYE: Kamala Harris tries convincing Americans making under $400k they WON’T be taxed ‘another penny’ under Biden’s plan and HOOBOY

Politico Playbook reports that Kamala Harris’ team feels ‘she’s really hit a stride in interviews’


 Share

 

 Tweet

Recommended Twitchy Video

"A Method To My Madness" Is John Kennedy The Most Effective Question-Asker In The Senate?

0 seconds of 5 minutes, 18 seconds

 

More Videos

"A Method To My Madness" Is John Kennedy The Most Effective Question-Asker In The Senate?

Kamala Harris: A Vice President And A Wordsmith

Biden Press Conference Devolves Into CHAOS After He Shows Up COMPLETELY Unprepared

Here's The Entire Timeline Of How The Media & Democrats Covered Up Hunter Biden's Corruption

Show Comments

ADVERTISEMENT


related articles


COVID-19

Gridiron Dinner Covid superspreader event tally now at 53

COVID-19

Pet dog beaten to death in Shanghai after owner sent to Covid quarantine facility

US NEWS

Sen. Chris Murphy and other blue-checks triggered by photo of Herschel Walker with Justice Clarence Thomas

US NEWS

Trump wins again: Judge vacates de Blasio-era order canceling the Trump Org’s contract to run the Ferry Point Park golf course

US NEWS

Pete Buttigieg explains to Charlamagne how the Biden administration is *really* helping Black Americans

US NEWS

Jen Psaki tells Peter Doocy why it was OK that Kamala Harris broke CDC guidelines yesterday AND today

US NEWS

Too little too LATE? Academy banning Will Smith from Oscars ceremony for 10 years only makes THEMSELVES (and Will) look worse

US NEWS

‘Stunning defeat for the government’: 2 men acquitted of plotting to kidnap Mich. Gov. Whitmer, hung jury on 2 others

US NEWS

‘The issue is SYSTEMIC grooming’: Critical Grooming Theory thread mocking principles of CRT is the best damn thing you’ll read today

US NEWS

Pete Buttigieg thinks Florida’s new law will ‘kill kids’ (inflation & gas prices also DeSantis’ fault)

MEDIA

Jennifer Rubin’s ongoing celebration of Ketanji Brown Jackson’s confirmation may have rendered her incoherent (well, *more* incoherent)

US NEWS

‘You stupid or somethin’?!’ Author’s analogy comparing trans kids to correcting left-handed children is the fail-iest FAIL of them all

US NEWS

Biden apparently no longer wants people to think Mitt Romney’s going to ‘put y’all back in chains’

US NEWS

Joe Biden lauds Ketanji Brown Jackson for triumphing over Senate GOP’s ‘verbal abuse [and] most vile baseless assertions and accusations’ [video]

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

Your new favorite nutcase website is insane like you have

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

Bill Maher was absolutely correct he said that the Republican Party has no agenda except to overturn the election next time.

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

https://twitchy.com/gregp-3534/2022/04/08/meme-of-the-day-kamala-harris-in-a-ups-truck/

rrb said...

She continued, “Musk’s appointment to Twitter’s board shows that we need regulation of social-media platforms to prevent rich people from controlling our channels of communication.

Like Bezos controls the WaPo and Dorsey used to control Twitter, and Zuckerberg controls Facebook?

She just doesn't want the WRONG rich people in control.

LOL. Typical leftist HACK.

rrb said...

Are you in favor of having given Alex Jones unrestrained ability widely to spread his lies about the parents and the situation of the Sandy Hook massacre?

YES.

I'm a free speech 1st Amendment absolutist, pederast.

Anything goes. Period. Full stop.

What's worse than that is what we have now. The subjective censoring and suppression of speech some special snowflake, grievance monger might find offensive.

Same with the enforcement of special pronouns for the mentally ill.

So you go by ze and zir, eh?

That's nice.

My pronouns are Fuck You & Go Fuck Yourself.

When assholes like you and the alky start telling folks like me what we can and cannot say because of some subjective bullshit you came up with, that's when the fucking shooting needs to start.

rrb said...




If you’re hurt by words you’ve probably never been punched in the face.


https://twitter.com/mchooyah/status/1512504289645768705?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1512504289645768705%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fdirectorblue.blogspot.com%2F

C.H. Truth said...

Private companies have the right to post what they want.

And when Elon Musk owns the largest shares and is on the board and decides to reinstate Trump and delete all the liberals because they are posting hateful disinformation...

You will think that is just as fair?

C.H. Truth said...

Are you in favor of having given Alex Jones unrestrained ability widely to spread his lies about the parents and the situation of the Sandy Hook massacre?

I don't know anything about Alex Jones' opinions on things... so no, I really don't care what he believes or what he is suggesting.


But it's not even a question Reverend.

You were all in on the lies of Donald Trump being a Russian asset in cahoots with Vladimir Putin to steal an election from Hillary Clinton.

Most of us understood this as a lie from the beginning, but something that weak minded low information people would believe because they really wanted to>


What about all the Covid lies about paper masks and lockdowns?


Who gets to determine which lies are okay and which lies are not?


Besides... who knows if your sources are lying about Alex Jones? Could be he is telling the truth and you are following the liars?



Bottom line... if you dont' like Alex Jones don't listen to him. I didn't watch Rachel "Trump liar extraordinaire" Maddow for information ever. A couple of times to see how truly unhinged she was and how blatant her lies were.. but you can ignore what you don't want to listen to.


We have libel and slander laws... if Jones tells lies about private citizens then Jones can be sued.

rrb said...



And when Elon Musk owns the largest shares and is on the board and decides to reinstate Trump and delete all the liberals because they are posting hateful disinformation...

You will think that is just as fair?



If Trump gets re-instated on Twitter that will stop the alky dead in his tracks.

LOL.

rrb said...

Blogger The Real Halfbaked Soars Pundit said...

Your new favorite nutcase website is insane like you have



What was that alky?

Do you even want to make sense anymore?

I can see why you've become committed to 100% copy/paste plagiarism. Left to your own devices you're an imbecile.


Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

Your own words made my point

What about all the Covid lies about paper masks and lockdowns?


Who gets to determine which lies are okay and which lies are not?


Scott you have zero experience on medical issues but you believe that a static analysis of masking and immune systems, is proof of political decisions by the CDC. I personally know more about immune systems than most people. They are not biased about medical issues 🙄

You have zero education on immune systems and other factors that caused the CDC guidelines.

You are a statistical writer who has zero knowledge of medical issues.

You have said that since the former President’s called it a Democratic Hoax

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

rrb is going to get crazy 🤪 😜 😳 😂

U.K. Prime Minister Boris Johnson paid a surprise visit to Kyiv on Saturday to meet with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky "in a show of solidarity with the Ukrainian people," British and Ukrainian officials said.

Driving the news: Johnson pledged new military assistance to Ukraine, including about 120 armored vehicles and new anti-ship missile systems, and guaranteed an additional $500 million in World Bank lending to Ukraine, per his office.

"We're setting out a new package of financial & military aid which is a testament of our commitment to his country's struggle against Russia’s barbaric campaign," Johnson wrote in a tweet after his meeting with Zelensky.

What they're saying: "It is because of President Zelensky’s resolute leadership and the invincible heroism and courage of the Ukrainian people that Putin’s monstrous aims are being thwarted," Johnson said to Zelensky, per the prime minister's office.

"I made clear today that the United Kingdom stands unwaveringly with them in this ongoing fight, and we are in it for the long run.""We are stepping up our own military and economic support and convening a global alliance to bring this tragedy to an end, and ensure Ukraine survives and thrives as a free and sovereign nation," Johnson said."Right now Boris Johnson's visit to Kyiv began with a tete-a-tete meeting with President Zelensky," Zelensky aide Andrij Sybiha wrote on Facebook at the beginning of the pair's meeting."Great Britain leader in defense support of Ukraine. The leader in the anti-war coalition. Leader in sanctions on Russian aggressor," Sybiha wrote.

State of play: In a meeting with German Chancellor Olaf Scholz on Friday, Johnson announced new sanctions against the Russian economy and condemned Russian President Vladimir Putin's "barbaric onslaught against Ukraine."

Johnson, who has been outspoken in his condemnation of Russia's unprovoked invasion of Ukraine, called the Russian missile attack on a train station in the city of Kramatorsk a "war crime.""The attack at the train station in eastern Ukraine shows the depths to which Putin’s vaunted army has sunk ... Russia’s crimes in Ukraine will not go unnoticed or unpunished," Johnson said on Friday.


He has said that the pictures are a haux because Putin said 🙄

C.H. Truth said...

Your new favorite nutcase website is insane like you have

What was that alky?

Well let's break it down:

- Since he doesn't specifically address who he is referring to, it's probably "Scott" "Scott" "Scott" - listen to me "Scott".

- The nutcase is probably something that he understands to be obvious to him (even if not obvious to anyone else) so he doesn't identify any nutcase.

- Obviously whatever website he is referring to is likely one that nobody here frequents, but he likes to simply associate the worst of everything with normal people who have nothing to do with it. Someone who voted for Trump and is a Nazi sympathizer in his brain "obviously" holds the same opinions as any other Trump voter.

- Inane is actually a word - it means silly. But I give it a 50/50 chance that he meant to type "insane" and simply misspelled.

- "like you have" is troublesome. It makes no sense from any grammer perspective. "like you" would have made some sense, but that would assume that he accidently typed in an entire word by mistake? Like you have something something something - might have made sense in the right context - but he forgot to finish it?


Bottom line: Roger was told by someone that a particular conservative was being bad and therefore he wants to hold someone on this blog personally responsible for it.... because he is stupid and doesn't understand that one person is not responsible for another person's actions just because they might agree to some degree on certain political matters.

-

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

And of course you have forgotten that in 1999, The state of Florida was Crooked. But even Al Gore followed the Supreme Court decision.


You still believe the big lie.

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

When people lose their arguments they say

Roger was told by someone that a particular conservative was being bad and therefore he wants to hold someone on this blog personally responsible for it..

You really are not capable of being objective.

I make up my own mind 😌

C.H. Truth said...

Scott you have zero experience on medical issues but you believe that a static analysis of masking and immune systems, is proof of political decisions by the CDC. I personally know more about immune systems than most people. They are not biased about medical issues

No need to know anything about immunity systems or anything like that.

All we need to understand is statistics Roger...

Statistics tells us 100% factually what worked and what didn't.

Doctors provide a best guess opinion based on their knowledge. But like any science, the hypothesis is just that... a hypothesis. It doesn't become a working theory or fact until there are tests, data, and can be verified through data.

That is where statistics comes in Roger.


Are you suggesting that John Hopkins and their study of the effects are wrong? Do you have the statistical or mathematical background to debate it with them.

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

Roger is so stupid

he is stupid and doesn't understand that one person is not responsible for another person's actions just because they might agree to some degree on certain political matters.


You really aren't sane anymore 😕

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

No need to know anything about immunity systems or anything like that.


Means that you have zero experience in science or medical issues.

Your analysis is political bias not medical or anything like immunity


You are a Hack

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

This was hilarious and funny because it applies to Scott

On last night's episode of "Real Time With Bill Maher," Maher did a segment with Nancy MacLean, historian at Duke University and author of the "Democracy in Chains: The Deep History of the Radical Right's Stealth Plan for America" and David Leonhardt, Pulitzer Prize-winning columnist and author of the New York Times daily newsletter, "The Morning" in which they discussed what is seemingly the topic of choice for republicans these days ... pedophilia.

Maher kicked off their talk by circling back to the subject of pedophilia, brought up initially in his monologue at the top of the episode, saying "maybe this is not the most important issue in America, I don't know, but I can't take my eyes off it like a car accident. It seems like, in a very short time, the republicans have become obsessed with pedophilia."

Related: The QAnon playbook: Republicans make school board meetings the new battleground

Maher recalled a time when calling someone a pedophile was a rarity that brought with it severe social connotations reserved for few and far between flashes of cultural depravity, and pointed out that now the word seems to be casually thrown around by senators.

"This is coming from QAnon, right?" Maher asked his guests. "It was only a couple years ago we were making fun of QAnon like it was such a fringe thing. Does this mean it's mainstream republicanism now?"

"Absolutely," said MacLean. "I mean I think what we've seen is the Republican party go off the rails to the MAGA faction, which is now dominating the party ranks, but also these elected officials."

Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.

MacLean goes on to point out that elected officials, such as Ted Cruz, are seemingly "smart" people with many degrees among them, and yet they continue to engage in such "absurdity."

At least thee of the truthers say that about James.


Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

And of course the American Thinker 🙄


Your favorite DeSantis

As we have seen in the case of Florida’s anti-Grooming legislation, the pushback against indoctrinating our youth has been vociferous.  Attempts to ban sexuality and gender ideology from k-3 classrooms were intentionally misrepresented as banning the word gay from classrooms.  This raises the question: why are activists so hellbent on pushing their ideas of gender and sexuality on the kids?

The purpose of all of this miseducation is a direct attack on the family itself.  Neo-Marxists promote the same end goals as the old Marxists, including the abolition of the nuclear family, which they view as a structure of the hegemony.  When the young are made to believe that their inherent sex or race is a cause for social rejection, they infer that they were set up for this status by their own parents.  This creates resentment and a schism in the nuclear family.  Many parents can attest to children returning home from school and castigating their parents for raising them with a bigoted worldview.  Many relationships are irreparably severed as a result.


Lmao 🤣

Anonymous said...

Bidenomics
"FINANCE BANK OF AMERICA

‘Recession shock’: Bank of America is the latest major institution to deliver a grim warning for the futureBanks, billionaires, and investors are warning that the writing is on the wall for a recession to strike".

Alex Jones Ch said...

“Republican elected officials are engaging in a disturbing, cynical trend of attacking vulnerable, transgender kids for purely partisan, political reasons,” the press secretary said. “Today in Alabama, instead of focusing on critical kitchen table issues, like the economy, COVID, or addressing the country’s mental health crisis, Republican lawmakers are currently debating legislation that among many things, will target trans youth with tactics that threaten to put pediatricians in prison if they provide medically necessary, life-saving healthcare for the kids they serve.”

The press secretary also announced that “lawmakers and other legislators who are contemplating these discriminatory bills have been put on notice by the Department of Justice and the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)” and said that outlawing sex reassignment, puberty blockers and hormone treatments for children by medical professionals “may violate the Constitution and federal law.”

She also claimed that all major medical associations agree that these treatments are the “best practice” and are “potentially life saving” to children identifying as transgender and therefore should not fear that their parents or medical professional could be imprisoned for “helping them and loving them.”

“President Biden has committed in both words and actions to fight for all Americans and will not hesitate to hold these states accountable,” she said.

The HHS endorsed gender reassignment surgeries for children to “support the mental health of transgender children” in celebration of Transgender Visibility Day.

HHS secretary Xavier Becerra said Wednesday he will do “everything [he] can” to ensure children can get sex changes. 

Anonymous said...

Seeking Alpha

Treasury Secretary Yellen Warns Of A Recession.

Bingo, finally the sirens are loud enough for her and others to hear.

Anonymous said...

Bidenomics Failing
Seth Carpenter, Morgan Stanley chief economist and former Federal Reserve deputy director of monetary affairs, thinks there is no way around a sharp slowing of the economy as the Federal Reserve embarks deeper into its rate hiking cycle.

"If you think about what the Fed itself thinks is the long-run sustainable growth rate of the economy, they think that rate of growth is below 2%. And so if you take a growth rate in the economy that's above 5% or 6%, and you're going to try to bring it down to below 2%, that 4-plus percentage point deceleration is just a massive, massive deceleration to happen, even if it happens over the course of two years or so. So I think no two ways about it, the slowing in the economy has to be dramatic," Carpenter said on Yahoo Finance Live."

🚨🚨🚨

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

The Idaho Supreme Court has temporarily blocked the state's law banning abortions after about six weeks of pregnancy.

Planned Parenthood sued to block the abortion ban, which was inspired by a Texas law that allows private citizens to sue providers who perform the procedure after cardiac activity is detected in an embryo, a week after Republican Gov. Brad Little signed the bill into law last month.


Due to the ruling, the law won't take effect as planned on April 22.

“We are thrilled that abortion will remain accessible in the state for now,” Rebecca Gibron, interim CEO of Planned Parenthood Great Northwest, Hawai’i, Alaska, Indiana, Kentucky, said in a statement to NBC News. “But our fight to ensure that Idahoans can fully access their constitutionally protected rights is far from over.”

The state’s Supreme Court instructed both sides to file further briefs as it continues to consider the case pending a final decision.

Anonymous said...

Bidenomics Failing Americans.

"Joe Biden’s next economic crisis: A recession?"

Yes, self inflicted.

Caliphate4vr said...

Get a life Alky

Geezus

Honest, decent, truthful Rev. said...

WOW!!!

Business Insider
60 elite Russian paratroopers refused to fight in the invasion of Ukraine, report says
Alia Shoaib - 11h ago

At least 60 Russian paratroopers from a unit in Pskov province refused to fight in Ukraine, a report says.

Up to 60 Russian paratroopers from one unit in Pskov province refused to fight in Ukraine, according to independent Russian newspaper Pskovskaya Gubernia.

The troops were fired, and some were threatened with criminal prosecution for desertion or failure to comply with an order, the paper wrote on its Telegram channel.

Insider was unable to verify the report independently.

Pskovskaya Gubernia is a Russian newspaper known for its independent reporting. Amid the country's crackdown on independent media, last month authorities raided the paper's offices and the homes of senior employees, according to the Committee to Protect Journalists.

Local activist Nikolay Kuzmin, who is affiliated with the opposition Yabloko party in Russia, appeared to corroborate the report on Telegram.

Kuzmin said he spoke to a driver who transported some of the paratroopers from Belarus back to Pskov, an important base for Russia's airborne forces.

Russia's military's airborne force, the VDV, has suffered heavy losses in Ukraine, which has dented their previous "elite" status.

One unit within the VDV, the renowned 331st Guards Parachute Regiment, lost its commander, Col. Sergei Sukharev, and at least 39 other members.

Russian forces have suffered heavy losses since it began its invasion of Ukraine, and reports suggest that morale is deteriorating.

The Pskov paratroopers are not the only ones reported to have refused to fight.

At least 11 members of Russia's Rosgvardia National Guard in the Khakassia region similarly rebelled, Newsweek reported, citing Russian-language news outlet New Focus.

Human rights lawyer Pavel Chikhov said on Telegram that Captain Farid Chitav and 11 of his Rosgvardia subordinates refused to invade Ukraine on February 25 because the orders were "illegal," Newsweek said.

Some captured Russians have said that their leaders lied to them about the plan to invade Ukraine, which left them unprepared for the fierce resistance.

Despite the Russian military's many advantages, it has failed to achieve the swift victory it had hoped for in Ukraine.

UK intelligence chief Jeremy Fleming said that Russian President Vladimir Putin "massively misjudged" the situation before invading, partly because his advisers are "afraid to tell him the truth."

NATO estimated last month that between 7,000 and 15,000 Russian soldiers had been killed in action in Ukraine.

In a rare frank admission, a Kremlin spokesman admitted on Sky News on Thursday that Russia had "significant losses of troops and it's a huge tragedy for us."

WOW!!!

Honest, decent, truthful Rev. said...

GET A LIFE WITH SOME ACTUAL TRUTH IN IT, CALI.

Anonymous said...

Groomer James .

Caliphate4vr said...

I know truth, you know prepubescent boys

Honest, decent, truthful Rev. said...

Here you go, ch un troothers:
Here are the Russian arguments you can agree with and use for your propaganda.

Washington Examiner
Russia’s heavily disputed top public justifications for war in Ukraine
Ryan King - 6h ago
Provided by Washington Examiner

Most of the world watched in horror and outrage as Russian guns turned on neighboring Ukraine in a seemingly unprovoked bloody conquest in February, but inside Russia’s borders, millions are buying the Kremlin’s claims of Western aggression.

Russian President Vladimir Putin’s approval rating within his country spiked from 69% in January to 83% in late March amid the war and economy-crushing sanctions, a poll released last week from independent pollster Levada found. The soaring approval among his people draws a stark contrast with the dismal approval rating of Russia abroad, particularly in the West, where Putin’s arguments for invading Ukraine have been roundly rejected.

The gap between Russia and the West has ostensibly been amplified by information silos. Moscow has aggressively ramped up internal censorship of dissenting views, while Western media has largely dismissed defenders of Russia’s actions as propagandists. To the West, Putin is a bloodthirsty madman hellbent on restoring former Russian glory. But to many Russians, the war was an act of last resort and a consequence of NATO and Ukraine disregarding yearslong pleas from the Kremlin.

Here are Russia’s heavily disputed top public justifications for unleashing its military might on Ukraine.

Honest, decent, truthful Rev. said...


Dubious claims of genocide in the Donbas region

Perhaps the most immediate justification the Kremlin gave for the war is a heavily disputed argument that Ukrainian activity has increased in the Donbas region. Two rebel territories in the region, Donetsk and Luhansk, have been subject to intense fighting since the 2014 Revolution of Dignity ousted pro-Russia Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych and replaced him with a pro-Western president.

Approximately 14,000 people died in the conflict between 2014 and the start of 2021, according to the United Nations. A ceasefire had been reached last year, and most of the heavy fighting had stopped, albeit with occasional shellings. But Putin threw out the agreement when he launched the attack in February.

Putin has labeled the conflict a genocide against ethnic Russians and vowed to “end the nightmare.”

“As I said in my previous address, you cannot look without compassion at what is happening there. It became impossible to tolerate it. We had to stop that atrocity, that genocide of the millions of people who live there and who pinned their hopes on Russia, on all of us,” Putin declared in a speech before the conflict commenced.

Days before the invasion, Russia and the Donbas territories alleged that Ukraine was gearing up for a massive escalation in the disputed region. The separatists called for an evacuation on Feb. 18.

The escalation never took place, and Western officials alleged it was merely a false pretext to justify Russia’s invasion. Western nations such as the United States also roundly rejected allegations of genocide against Russians in the Donbas.


Unsubstantiated allegations that Ukraine wants a nuke

Russia has claimed without evidence to have intelligence that Ukraine was pursuing a nuclear bomb.

“The showdown between Russia and these forces cannot be avoided. They are getting ready and waiting for the right moment. Moreover, they went as far as to aspire to acquire nuclear weapons. We will not let this happen,” Putin claimed during his speech before the invasion.

Scott Ritter, a former U.N. weapons inspector, told the Washington Examiner that the nuclear allegations were largely “more propaganda than reality.”

“All things being said, I don't think Russia would have used this alone to justify military intervention,” he said.

Rafael Grossi, the head of the International Atomic Energy Agency, which has inspection power in Ukraine, cast doubt on Russian claims and emphasized the agency found no evidence to support the Kremlin’s allegations.

Honest, decent, truthful Rev. said...

NATO's eastward expansion

Moscow has been railing against NATO’s eastward expansion for years. Last December, Putin demanded that NATO scale down troop and weapons deployment in countries that entered the trans-Atlantic partnership after 1997. He also called for NATO to rule out allowing admittance of Ukraine into the alliance, effectively ending its open-door policy.

NATO rejected these demands, saying they violated a core principle of the 1949 North Atlantic Treaty that founded the alliance.

The Kremlin feels that NATO expansion toward its eastern borders poses major national security concerns and has repeatedly maintained that Ukraine’s admittance into the alliance would be a red line.

But it was Russia’s aggressive actions in the region, such as its attack on Georgia in 2008 and annexation of Crimea in 2014, that have pushed eastern countries toward NATO.

“The idea that NATO is an aggressive expansionist power that, in some way, threatens Russia is frankly absurd,” Dr. Ian Garner, a historian and a Russian propaganda watcher, told the Washington Examiner. “There is only one power invading neighboring countries.”


False claims the 2014 change in power in Ukraine was a coup

Russia has maintained that the 2014 Revolution of Dignity was a “coup” and that the succeeding governments have been illegitimate. Moscow further alleges the CIA and other Western intelligence groups propped up the protests to overthrow Yanukovych.

“Russia claims it has intercepted conversations, some of those have been leaked where we have Victoria Nuland speaking in a manner which suggests if the United States was handpicking, future post-Yanukovych Ukrainian government members,” Ritter said. “They had all the trappings of a Western-sponsored coup d'etat against the democratically duly elected President of Ukraine to replace him with a new government that was inherently undesirable by Russia.”

Massive protests had formed in Ukraine at the time over Yanukovych’s decision not to sign a free trade agreement with the EU. Demonstrators accused him of rampant corruption and serving as a puppet for Putin. In February 2014, police began opening fire on the protesters, including with live rounds. Violence quickly escalated, and demonstrators occupied government buildings.

Shortly afterward, Yanukovych signed an agreement with his opposition in the parliament to establish an interim government, but the next day, protesters seized control of Kyiv, and the Ukrainian Parliament voted to boot him from office.

Yanukovych was replaced with pro-European Petro Poroshenko in an election that took place the following May.

“They can't possibly argue this is an undemocratic country when free and fair elections are happening, and power has been transitioned peacefully,” Garner said. “So when it comes to this, it’s another example of a specter that's been cooked up.”


Honest, decent, truthful Rev. said...

Diplomacy fell through

Putin contends he exhausted his diplomatic options before resorting to military violence.

“For eight years, for eight endless years, we have been doing everything possible to settle the situation by peaceful political means. Everything was in vain,” he said.

However, to the West, Putin’s version of diplomacy felt more akin to a bad actor trying to extort a ransom when he dispatched thousands of troops to the border of Ukraine and began demanding concessions from NATO last year.

The U.S. and other Western nations dismissed Putin's demands that NATO withdraw support from newer member states and oppose Ukraine joining the alliance. While the West expressed openness to negotiations on nuclear restraints, the few areas of consensus were not enough to prevent conflict.

It is unclear whether Putin made any demands on the Donbas situation during that time.

Ultimately, many experts in the West cite evidence the war is transpiring for reasons that differ from Russia’s stated justifications, with Garner pointing to Russia’s history for the true motive.

“The war is a war of colonial aggression,” he said. “Putin believes, and many Russians believe, that Ukraine is simply historically fated and ethnically fated to belong to Moscow in some way.”

Russia has a history of lying, with Russian Ambassador to the U.S. Anatoly Antonov telling CBS that Russia had “no plans for invasion” just four days before the country's troops entered Ukraine.

Despite Putin’s claim that Russia was intent on addressing the situation in Donbas and did not plan to “occupy the Ukrainian territory” or “impose anything on anyone by force,” Russian forces moved into Ukraine on Feb. 24 and quickly attempted to seize Kyiv in an apparent bid to overthrow the government.

BUT PUTIN WILL FIND HERE AT CH'S PROPAGANDA HUB PEOPLE WHO AGREE WITH HIM.

Anonymous said...

James, do you see the Biden Recession coming?

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

The Smoking Rifle 🚬

Two days after the 2020 election, Donald Trump Jr texted the White House chief of staff, Mark Meadows, with strategies for overturning the result, CNN reported.

WASHINGTON, DC - DECEMBER 09: Stop the Steal organizer Ali Alexander returns to a conference room for a deposition meeting on Capitol Hill with the House select committee investigating the January 6th attack on December 09, 2021 in Washington, DC. Members of the committee and staff members are meeting with Alexander as well as Government official Kash Patel, who both say they are cooperating with the committee investigation.

Pro-Trump activist who planned 6 January rally to cooperate with inquiry


“This is what we need to do please read it and please get it to everyone that needs to see it because I’m not sure we’re doing it,” Trump Jr reportedly wrote, adding: “It’s very simple … We have multiple paths[.] We control them all.”


‘The Russians are trying toobliterate us. You think that we’d agree to half‑measures now?’

One leading legal authority called the text “a smoking rifle”.

CNN said the text was sent on 5 November 2020, two days before Joe Biden was declared the winner of the election and the next president.

Two months after 5 November, on 6 January 2021, supporters Trump told to “fight like hell” in his cause attacked the US Capitol. A bipartisan Senate report connected seven deaths to the riot.

According to CNN, in his texts to Meadows, Trump Jr laid out strategies the Trump team went on to pursue as they disseminated lies about election fraud and pressured state and federal officials.

Such tactics included lawsuits in swing states, the overwhelming majority of which were rejected, and “having a handful of Republican state houses put forward slates of fake ‘Trump electors’”.

CNN also said Trump Jr suggested that if such measures didn’t work, lawmakers in Congress could dismiss the electoral results and vote to keep Trump in office.

In the immediate aftermath of the Capitol riot, 147 Republicans in Congress voted to object to results in key states.

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/apr/09/trump-jr-texts-mark-meadows-white-house-election-result

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

Proud Boys member pleads guilty to role in US Capitol attack

Charles Donohoe will co-operate, giving prosecutors a boost in pursuit of high-ranking members of the far-right group


Ramon Antonio Vargas in New York

Sat 9 Apr 2022 14.03 EDT

A member of the far-right Proud Boys group has pleaded guilty to conspiring to attack the US Capitol in a bid to stop Congress certifying Joe Biden’s victory in the 2020 election, giving prosecutors a win in their pursuit of high-ranking members.

Capitol attack investigators zero in on far-right Oath Keepers and Proud Boys


As part of an agreement with prosecutors that will require him to cooperate against co-defendants, Charles Donohoe, 34, pleaded guilty on Friday in US district court in Washington to charges of conspiring to obstruct an official proceeding and assaulting Capitol police.

Why the battle for Donbaswill be very different from the assault on Kyiv

The North Carolina native could face up to 28 years in prison. However, citing federal sentencing guidelines, prosecutors estimated in court records he would serve six or seven years.

The judge, Timothy Kelly, did not immediately set a sentencing date. Five co-defendants, including well-known group members Enrique Tarrio and Dominic Pezzola, are tentatively scheduled to go to trial in May.

In December, Matthew Greene of New York became the first Proud Boys member to admit to a role in the plot to attack the Capitol, as part of a deal with prosecutors. Greene also agreed to cooperate with authorities.

According to prosecutors, on 6 January, Donohoe was among at least 100 Proud Boys who marched from the “Save America” rally near the White House to the Capitol in hope of derailing Congress’ certification of Biden’s victory over Donald Trump.

Donohoe held a high rank in the group. In the days leading up to the rally, he, Tarrio and others used encrypted messaging apps to discuss organizing a “Ministry of Self Defense” that would invade the Capitol.




Myballs said...

Appeals court upholds $32M decision for bakery over Oberlin college over stupid wokism run amok.

America will tell the liberal left to shove it in 7 months.

Anonymous said...

Biden's Recession is heating up because of his Day #1 E.O.. attacking Oil and gas industry and in turn Farmers and Ranchers.

Myballs said...

Biden bragging about jobs created numbers is absurd. People returning to work 8s not creating jobs. Voters see this too. Bid4n will be one of the all time failed presidents.

Anonymous said...

Roger , you said Biden would be at 48%.

Nope, Spectacularly wrong again.

Anonymous said...

The Un-retired wave continues.
BIDENOMICS has destroyed their hopes and dreams and forced them to return to work.

7.9 inflation in 2021
And so far inflation is worse.

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

Opinion, Analysis, Essays

CULTURE & LIFESTYLE
Fox News isn't news
A new study suggests Fox News viewers aren’t just manipulated and misinformed — they are literally being made ignorant by their consumption habits.

New Corp And Some Of Its Journalists Targeted In Cyberattack
The headquarters for Fox News and News Corp in New York City. Spencer Platt / Getty Images
SHARE THIS —
April 9, 2022, 5:30 AM EDT
By Dan Froomkin, editor of Press Watch
The problem with Fox “News,” the cable TV channel, isn’t just what it is — it’s also what it isn’t.

It is often a purveyor of propaganda and misinformation. What it’s not is a source of “news” — at least not by any normal definition.

According to Broockman and Kalla, when these Fox viewers watched CNN, they heard about all sorts of things Fox wasn’t telling them.

That’s one of the conclusions I drew from a fascinating new study in which arch-conservative Fox TV viewers were paid to watch CNN for a month. The study, titled “The manifold effects of partisan media on viewers’ beliefs and attitudes: A field experiment with Fox News viewers,” was performed by a pair of political scientists: David Broockman, who teaches at UC-Berkeley, and Joshua Kalla, who teaches at Yale.


According to Broockman and Kalla, when these Fox viewers watched CNN, they heard about all sorts of things Fox wasn’t telling them. They processed that information. They took it in. They became more knowledgeable about what was really going on in the United States.

The experiment didn’t change their political preferences — certainly not in just one month. But it slightly altered their perceptions of certain key issues and political candidates.

The study authors differentiated between “traditionally emphasized forms of media influence,” like agenda setting and framing, and what they call “partisan coverage filtering”: the choice to selectively report information about selective topics, based on what’s favorable to the network’s partisan side, and ignore everything else.


One lesson here is that Fox viewers are reachable with real news. While fact-checks have been known to get people to believe falsehoods even more strongly, plain news — and even opinionated news — still registers.

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

But the biggest takeaway for me is the realization that Fox viewers aren’t just manipulated and misinformed — they are literally being made ignorant by their consumption habits. Watching Fox, they hear a lot of “news-like” things, but they don’t learn about what’s really happening.

And here’s where we in the mainstream media can do something useful: We can stop talking about Fox like it’s a different form of news — and start talking about how it isn’t news at all. It’s the opposite of news. It’s instead of news. It’s the absence of news.


We can explain more clearly that real news organizations present viewers with the information they need regardless of whether it hurts or helps a specific cause or political party.

Mainstream, reality-based journalists have been way too charitable to Fox over the years, partly because the network once employed some of them, and partly to maintain the façade of political neutrality.

But it’s time to firmly declare that Fox is not news.

The study started with 763 far-right loyal Fox News viewers, then randomly assigned 40 percent to a “treatment” group. That group was then paid $15 an hour to watch up to seven hours of CNN per week during September 2020, during prime-time hours. Participants were given quizzes to make sure they were paying attention.

Mainstream, reality-based journalists have been way too charitable to Fox over the years, partly because the network did once employ some of them.

It found that CNN and Fox were covering dramatically different things that month. The severity of Covid and the Trump administration’s failures to control it “were by far the most common topics on CNN” — even as Fox downplayed it and praised Trump’s behavior. By contrast, Fox News spent 15,236 words discussing “Biden/Democrats support for extreme racial ideology/protests,” to CNN’s 1,300.

The study found that the CNN-watching group was “much more likely to see issues covered on CNN (COVID-19) instead of on Fox News (racial protests) as important.” The group also “became more likely to agree that if Donald Trump made a mistake, Fox News would not cover it.”

One particularly hopeful finding was that watching CNN caused Fox viewers “to become substantially more supportive of vote-by-mail than the control group.” Both networks covered the topic extensively, with CNN emphasizing facts about how secure it is, and Fox falsely hawking its susceptibility to fraud. Republican measures to block Democratic constituencies from voting and challenge results not to their liking depend heavily on Republican voters believing lies about Democrats engaging in massive fraud.

(Notably, attitudes around race, climate change and policing remained unchanged.)


The study authors’ assertion that partisan slants happen on both sides of the cable news spectrum is the one false note in their report. Fox and CNN are not different flavors of news, they are different things entirely. News organizations with any legitimate claim to that title do not keep important information from the public based on which party it benefits. CNN — or primetime MSNBC — may be opinionated, but they remain fundamentally fact-based. Fox does not. (MSNBC, like NBC News, is part of NBCUniversal.)

You could certainly argue — and I do — that corporate news does its own kind of coverage filtering. There are all sorts of things the corporate media decides not to cover that independent journalists do, like poverty, mass incarceration, U.S.-caused civilian casualties, how the Washington agenda is skewed by money, and these days, pretty much anything that is good news for Biden.

But mainstream media still bases its reports on evidence, not on whim. It doesn’t hide key elements of an ongoing story, under any circumstance. Fox cannot say the same.

anonymous said...

Advocated for killing babies and genital mutilation if children .

ESPECILAALY FOR PEOPLE LIKE YOU, GOAT FUCKER!!!!!!

James's Fucking Daddy said...


IMPORTANT NEWS for CNN VIEWERS IN CALIFORNIA

Are probably unaware unless they watch real news shows


Surging electric bills threaten Calif. climate goals


Millions of Californians pay among the highest prices in the nation for electricity, a potential threat to the state’s plans to electrify cars and homes as it battles climate change.

Surging electricity prices of the three biggest utilities in the Golden State have reached levels that now are more than double the national average, as posted by the U.S. Energy Information Administration. Bills are projected to keep climbing as utilities address wildfire risk from their power lines and add electric vehicle charging stations. Ratepayers ultimately bankroll those costs.

The state as a result faces a looming crisis, some analysts say. California wants residents to swap gasoline-fueled cars and natural gas heaters for electric models. But if power rates keep rising, it will cost more to plug in an EV at home than to fill up a gas tank, economists project.
continues
https://www.eenews.net/articles/surging-electric-bills-threaten-calif-climate-goals/

Wow, cost more to plug in your electric car than fill up in the over $6 a gallon gas in California

and additionally are facing power outages

Thanks dems

and Biden

Who is still stupid enough to vote for these losers ?

James's Fucking Daddy said...

* and MSNBC viewers who are in the dark

Anonymous said...

James Fucking Daddy

This is a true success story.

"Surging electricity prices of the three biggest utilities in the Golden State have reached levels that now are more than double the national average, as posted by the U.S. Energy Information Administration. Bills are projected to keep climbing as utilities address wildfire risk from their power lines and add electric vehicle charging stations. Ratepayers ultimately bankroll those costs"

IF , Texas stops sending California Electricity , California would collapses.

Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

But this is not your grandfather’s (or the young Joe Biden’s) energy crisis. Biden can survive the politics of “Putin’s price hike”, as he called it, and has the opportunity to take bold government action that leaves Americans more secure than before.

The 1970s were different. In 1973, the Arab embargo that cut off Middle Eastern exports of oil to the United States came as a total shock to the electorate. Few Americans knew that the geopolitical landscape of global energy production had been rapidly changing. American production was declining as demand was increasing. Because energy had been so cheap, Americans lived an energy-intensive lifestyle. More than three-quarters of Americans drove to work and most did so alone. Between 1970 and 1973, the amount of imports doubled to meet demand.

As shortages accrued, and prices soared, the result was a full-scale panic at the pump. There was despair and anger. “If you can’t sell them gas, they’ll threaten to beat you up, wreck your station, run you over with a car,” reported one Miami station owner.




President Nixon couldn’t figure out what to do. In the wake of Vietnam and in the midst of the Watergate scandal, there was little sense that the US could muster any kind of military response. Outside of nuclear power, there were no real fossil fuel alternatives to promote.

The number one demand was for government to use its authority to roll back prices to before Opec hikes had quadrupled the price. But Nixon, needing the support of congressional conservatives to fight his impeachment battle, refused to act.

The situation was worse for Jimmy Carter when Americans experienced their second oil shock, as Iranian unrest in 1978 led to the return of gas lines in the summer of 1979. Once again, Americans went berserk. There were long lines, and “Carter Kiss My Gas” became a popular bumper sticker. Striking truckers tied up the nation’s highways, and angry citizens even set gas stations on fire.

Carter, a former Sunday school teacher who believed deeply in conservation and the need to abandon indulgence in favor of austerity, responded with the most tone-deaf presidential speech ever delivered. When Americans needed to know how government was going to protect them, Carter instead blamed them for living extravagantly.

Even as he installed solar panels on the roof (nuclear was off the table given the accident at Three Mile Island in March 1979), the emphasis was on using less. He certainly offered no Green New Deal-style jobs program.

At just the moment when the energy crisis required government to step in to offer immediate relief and to devise a long-term energy policy, the American government was moving to the right and Carter wasn’t going to swim against the tide.

Yet, as history shows, in times of international instability, such as in the second world war, Americans have often relied on a strong government to preserve their way of life. Growing government in times of international turmoil, including an energy crisis connected to war, can help Americans endure challenges that threaten their economic wellbeing.


Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

Biden, who first came into political office in the middle of the energy crisis in 1973, has the opportunity to act more like Franklin Roosevelt than Nixon or Carter. Biden should immediately impose across-the-board price controls on gas and oil. He can do this because he has options that didn’t exist in the 1970s: the US is more independent, more energy efficient, more invested in alternative fuels – and, as the 1991 Gulf war showed, more willing to defend the free flow of global oil. Indeed, Biden has promised, “I’m going to take robust action and make sure the pain of our sanctions is targeted at the Russian economy, not ours.”

Advertisement

The horrific images coming from Ukraine give Biden some breathing space, as is evident in the polls showing bipartisan support for tough action against Russia, that his predecessors didn’t have. Even as he has shown restraint, Biden sees Putin’s actions as a struggle between democracy and autocracy. He took aim at companies exploiting the moment. “To the oil and gas companies, and to the finance firms – we understand that Putin’s war against the people of Ukraine is causing prices to rise, we get that, that’s self-evident,” he said.

He added: “It’s no excuse to exercise excessive price increases, or padding profits, or any kind of effort to exploit this situation or American consumers.”

Biden has a chance to rally the country. He can call for lower speed limits, encourage Americans who are able to continue working from home, and ask everyone to conserve. But he should also go further. Now is the time to push hard on a big, robust progressive agenda.


Coldheartedtruth Teller said...

He should start with targeted price controls on oil and gas. The oil companies, which are reaping substantial windfall profits, should not use this moment to enrich themselves but rather to rally and stand behind consumers in the fight against Putin. At a moment of war, when the market is functioning under massive stress, governments should step in to set prices; they should be high enough to attract capital and investment but not so high as to allow Putin to fuel his war machine and harm the global economy.


As he did in the State of the Union address, Biden should also push for the rest of his agenda to lower costs for American families, from rent control to an investigation into meat prices, to caps on prescription drug prices to college debt forgiveness to subsidized child care. In truth gas prices, as much as they are the most visible tracker of inflation, comprise a small amount of consumer spending – especially compared with these other essential items.

Finally, Biden should fight for his clean energy agenda, and he should promote it as a jobs act that will bring growth and independence. The bipartisan infrastructure bill was a historic first step. In 1956, Eisenhower passed the National Interstate and Defense Highways Act in the name of national security. The time has come to rebrand Build Back Better into the American Security and Democracy Act and pass it.

Putin’s war presents an opportunity to defend democracy, shore up American security, and chart a path toward a fossil-free future. It is time for Biden to embrace the Rooseveltian tradition of using government in times of turmoil. By doing so, he will strengthen our nation, and the resolve of voters, to support the tough steps that will be essential to containing and rolling back Russian aggression.


Meg Jacobs teaches history and public affairs at Princeton University and is author of Panic at the Pump, about the 1970s energy crisis.

Anonymous said...

Texas, generates more electricity then California from wind .

Kansas ranks 5th right behind California at fourth.

Anonymous said...

Groomer Roger goes full in on Socialist Biden's hate America first agenda.

Control the means of production.

Anonymous said...

Note Roger does not oemwn a EV.

But, in true Socialist style demands you do.

Hard pass.

Red State ♥️ said...


Democrats Prepare Russian Collusion 2.0 for the Midterms

By Bonchie | Apr 09, 2022 4:00 PM E


The irony of Democrats now being staunch Russia hawks never ceases to amaze. We went from Barack Obama “dunking” on Mitt Romney in 2012 for asserting Vladimir Putin’s nation is our chief geopolitical foe to the left asserting that Russia is under every bed. All the while, we are supposed to believe that such a shift was totally organic and not at all politically motivated.

Still, onlookers with even half a brain can see the truth. All the Russia hysteria has been meant to make partisan headway, from the claims of  election-stealing” interference during the 2016 election to the idea that the Kremlin actively worked to defeat the current president, Joe Biden. And to be sure, to some extent, the strategy has worked. Certainly, it helped blow up Donald Trump’s tenure, and in 2020, the moral panic over Russia once again took hold of many people who breathlessly believed a few Facebook ads turned the tide four years prior.

Never one to stop running a play that has worked, the Democrats are now preparing to do it again. Russian collusion 2.0 is being prepared just in time for November’s midterms.

Russian President Vladimir Putin may use the Biden administration’s support for Ukraine as a pretext to order a new campaign to interfere in American politics, U.S. intelligence officials have assessed.

Intelligence agencies have so far not found any evidence that Putin has authorized measures like the ones Russia is believed to have undertaken in the 2016 and 2020 presidential elections in support of former President Donald Trump, according to several people familiar with the matter who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive findings.

According to these unnamed intelligence officials, who are breaking the law to leak things to the Associated Press, Russia isn’t happy with Biden’s response to its invasion of Ukraine and is looking to interfere in the coming election. Sure enough, the implication here is that the way to push back on Russia’s malfeasance is to elect Democrats. Otherwise, you are letting Putin win. What a coincidence, right?

The intelligence community has repeatedly injected itself into politics in this way, with bogus assessments backed by no provided data. Partisan operatives then launder accusations to liberal news outlets who report them as unwavering fact — despite there being no source material given. Meanwhile, all the American public is supposed to take from such nonsense is that big, bad Russia wants Republicans to win and Biden’s party to lose.

Further, notice the weasel words using the report. Russia “may use” Biden’s behavior as a pretext, it claims. Clearly, there is nothing actually indicating they will, otherwise you wouldn’t see that kind of hedging. But just putting the headline out there is enough to be a political contribution to the Democrat Party, and that’s all the Associated Press exists to do at this point.

Republicans must push back hard on this garbage, lest they be swallowed up by it again. There’s no reason to even grant the premise here. If Democrats lose in November, it will not be because of anything Russia did. Unfortunately, I wouldn’t hold my breath on most Republicans having the guts to stand up to such a false narrative. The concern of being called bad names on CNN rides high on most of their minds.


Anonymous said...

Told ya so over a month ago.

"(NewsNation) ⁠— Deutsche Bank is warning that the economy will tumble into a recession.

With rising Fed interest rates, Deutsche economists say a U.S. recession will likely begin late next year as the country grapples with some of the fastest-growing inflation in decades.

No plan from the Outhouse of Joe Biden and his grade F Economic team.

Anonymous said...

Politico

BIDENOMICS has failed America.
"The widely watched University of Michigan consumer confidence survey recently touched its lowest level in almost 11 years. An Associated Press/NORC survey showed that almost 70 percent of Americans think the economy is in poor shape, and 81 percent of those in a poll released by CNBC see a recession coming this year. Gallup found the share of Americans citing inflation as the top issue is now at its highest level since the 1980s."