Do Democrats actually have a message for what they actually want to do?

If so, what exactly is it and why are they not talking about anything other than abortion?

According to Tom Baslie from the Washington Times

This week they unleashed a four-part message war against pro-life conservatives and the Republican Party with the precision of a Swiss clock. President Biden, senators, members of Congress, mayors and governors all mindlessly jumped on board with the strategy. 

First, the Supreme Court’s potential overturning of Roe v. Wade will threaten interracial marriage.

Second, the end of Roe will mean conservatives will, as embattled Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot said, target LGBTQ Americans next. 

Third, the Supreme Court is somehow illegitimate because it’s not elected. 

Fourth, America’s ills are all due to the fact that the “ultra MAGA” crowd has taken over the Republican Party.

So in spite of Justice Thomas being in an interracial marriage and that the arguments about the sanctity of life have nothing to do with the LGBTQ, the left is simply trying to scare people. You know, like Hitler scared the Germans, or like Stalin scared the Soviets, or like any good fascist state uses hate and fear to push an ideology. 

To the degree that Liberals judge all of this through their own assumptions about how the court should work is a question, but the reality is that the court is making a fundamental "legal" and "constitutional" ruling, not a social one. While I am sure that the social aspects have a place here, none of the three Justices who are opposed to this ruling could really probably make a legitimate constitutional defense for the original Roe ruling. 

The original Roe ruling was a social ruling that went in search for constitutional cover to make it appear somewhat legal. The old "privacy" argument has been rejected for similar issues ad nauseum and Roe is pretty much never used as a "precedent" other than for stares decisis for other specific abortion rulings. Whether or not one agrees or disagrees with abortion is really irrelevant to whether or not there is a constitutional right to have one. 

The irony is that it was the "courts" that made abortion legal, not legislation. The idea that the court overturning another court decision is somehow "undemocratic" is unhinged and grossly illogical thinking. No, we don't "elect" the Judicial members. That is by design. More to the point, the court members that made a "constitutional ruling" and made abortion legal were no more elected than those who are going to overturn the ruling. 

This ultimately might do more harm than good for the Democrats. Without a message, they now believe that abortion can become their message. But it's really "not" a message unless you really want to campaign on what you plan to do. Obviously the fake attempt to pass an unpassible Abortion for all, anytime, anyplace, by the doctor of your choice, paid for by taxpayers is never going to pass and the lion's share of Americans would oppose it. In other words, their actual position here is very unpopular.

Which is why they will just continue to lie to create more fear. They are already saying that the ridiculous bill was just "codifying Roe" when in fact it went way beyond not only Roe, but what most sensible Americans want. It won't take long for that lie to be exposed and then where do they go? If between now and November they could actually hash out a law that was representative of the majority of Americans, they would lose the only issue they believe they have?

Hard to say you are an effective leader when you refuse to get the one thing done you say you are campaigning on, because what the American public wants does not go far enough. But that is the underlying argument (whether they admit it or not). 

Otherwise... without lying about abortion? What else do the Democrats have?