Despite President Joe Biden’s assault on election integrity efforts in several states, voters in record numbers are demanding that identification be presented to get a ballot and want reforms across the board in all 50 states. New polling provided to Secrets Monday showed that 84% want voter ID, and huge percentages of black and Hispanic voters are behind the surge in support as the nation readies for the fall congressional midterm elections.
- In addition to the 84% support for identification laws, 75% would vote for a ballot initiative requiring everyone to show photo ID in person or write an ID number on a mail ballot. And 75% said it would be “easy” to write an ID number on a ballot.
- Over 60% want a ban on vote trafficking, or allowing people to bundle votes and drop them in boxes.
- Most want clearer mail-in voting, which exploded during the COVID crisis. The survey said that 80% of voters believe that the convenience of mail voting must be balanced with adequate protections against fraud.
- Over half, 52%, want private funding of elections “cut off.”
- Eight in 10 want states to clean up voter roles and eliminate duplicate names, dead voters, and outdated and inaccurate information.
- Nearly all want voting by foreign citizens banned. Only 9% of voters think that noncitizens should be able to vote. Noncitizen voting was rejected by 75% of Hispanic voters and 69% of black voters, as well as 77% of Democrats and 83% of independents.
We are now looking at at least seven states under investigation for an organized scheme to stuff the ballot drop-off boxes, that may have provided more than a million illegal votes for Biden in several battleground states. We have confessions from at least two people who were involved and they were paid anywhere from $10-$30 a vote to ballot harvest and stuff the boxes. Documentent video evidence of such behavior is currently under criminal review.
All of this fraud could be avoided with tighter election controls and a more robust attempt to track down and prosecute this. Many of those involved are not even aware that they are breaking the law? How could that be?
Either way... Americans overwhelmingly want tighter election restrictions over "ease of voting". Democratic politicians pushing these laws (or against voter ID laws) are out for their own self-preservation and only represent the very extremes of even their own Party.
149 comments:
Nothing that the left demands is popular, which is why it all must be made mandatory.
Kansas Voter ID is simple.
Have one of the acceptable one and you get to vote in person.
Don't have an ID , we the people will pay for one for you.
Roger has 4,500 "facebook" friends.
His last 10 post have less then 3 "likes".
Democrats see voting almost entirely as a right, while Republicans tend to see it as both a right and a responsibility. This helps to explain why Democrats have such an intense aversion to any measure, such as voter ID or restrictions on ballot harvesting, that may interfere with the ability of people to vote. It also helps to explain why Republicans are not troubled by the possibility that some small proportion of voters may be prevented from voting due to such measures. If voting is a responsibility, it is not unreasonable to ask voters to obtain a valid ID or to return their own ballot, especially if those requirements are deemed necessary to maintain confidence in the integrity of the election. In fact, for both parties, the second predisposition is intertwined with the first. That Democrats see voting as a pure right makes any rule-based concerns seem all the more petty to them. That Republicans see strict enforcement of voting rules as essential to valid elections makes them even more likely to emphasize voters’ responsibilities.
https://www.fairfieldsuntimes.com/opinion/parties-see-election-law-through-different-lenses/article_ce87f9c4-e897-58a7-9a8a-f45f1d88163f.html
That Republicans see strict enforcement of voting rules as essential, because they believe the big lie.
Despite the fact that the U.S courts have found no credible sources Scott said that Documentent video evidence of such behavior is currently under criminal review. You still want to put Hillary in jail.
DEMOCRATS TAKING UP ARMS FOR EVEN MORE POPULAR PRO CHOICE
Democrats Energized After Leaked Abortion Decision
May 3, 2022 at 6:08 pm EDT By Taegan Goddard 512 Comments
“Not yet 24 hours after the publication of a leaked Supreme Court draft opinion that would overturn constitutional protections of abortion rights, Democrats at every level across the country were capitalizing on a potentially SEISMIC SHIFT IN THE POLITICAL LANDSCAPE that could upend what was to be a bloodbath of a midterm election for an otherwise disillusioned party,”
NBC News reports.
“Attacks on Republican candidates are underway,
as are a flurry of pleas for donations.
Ads defending abortion rights are rapidly populating social media.
The Democratic National Committee launched a text messaging campaign to move people to the streets,
while some of the most powerful Democratic groups in the nation
were huddling to reshape their messaging.”
Associated Press:
Sudden abortion focus shakes midterm election landscape.
Hey pedo, do you understand the 18th and 21st Amendments yet?
LMAO
Fucking tool
Stick to c’ing & p’ing
You’re too stupid to think on your own
Yeah, I understand that to say the Constitution has no provision for something makes no sense when an amendment or a SCOTUS decision can make it have such a provision.
WASHINGTON, May 3 (Reuters) - Nearly two-thirds of Americans said they are more likely to back candidates who support the right to abortion in the November midterm elections, according to a Reuters/Ipsos poll conducted on Tuesday.
The poll of 998 voters also found that a plurality of Americans - 41% - said the country would be a worse place to live if the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision that established the right to abortion nationwide.
It was conducted hours after the publication of a draft opinion by the top court signaling that the justices were ready to do just that. The court on Tuesday confirmed that the opinion was authentic but also said that it was not final. read more
Some 63% of respondents, including 78% of Democrats and 49% of Republicans, said they were more likely to support candidates who support abortion rights in the Nov. 8 election that will determine control of Congress for the next two years.
The looming Supreme Court decision, expected to be issued by the end of June, represents the result of years of work by Republicans cementing a 6-3 conservative majority on the high court, and 51% of Republicans surveyed said they were less likely to vote for a candidate who supports abortion rights.
The court ruling could change the dynamic of the election, in which Republicans had been heavily favored to recapture control of at least one chamber of Congress, allowing them to block Democratic President Joe Biden's legislative agenda.
The poll found that 41% of Americans thought that repealing Roe v. Wade would make the United States a worse place to live. Republicans were divided on this point, with 28% saying it would make things worse, 29% saying it would make things better and 36% offering no opinion.
The poll reflected Americans' overall divisions on abortion: 52% of respondents said it should be legal in most or all cases, while 40% said it should be illegal in most or all cases.
The poll had a credibility internal, a measure of precision, of 3.8 percentage points.
The bottom line is the Democrats have to keep both houses
I understand too that the Repugnicans have apparently stumbled into some deep doo doo.
Yeah, I understand that to say the Constitution has no provision for something makes no sense when an amendment or a SCOTUS decision can make it have such a provision.
Hey stupid the Constitution makes provisions for Amendments. My god you’re dumb. That’s the point of something you post frequently and do not understand “ GOVERNMENT OF THE PEOPLE, BY THE PEOPLE, FOR THE PEOPLE”. 9 people in black robes that are not accountable, shouldn’t be the deciders
Don’t think on your own pedo, you fail miserably
J.D. Vance will win the GOP primary for Senate in Ohio, CNN projects. Former President Donald Trump had endorsed him.
Honest, decent, truthful Rev.May 3, 2022 at 7:16 PM
Democrats GREATLY ENERGIZED After Leaked Abortion Decision
And
Honest, decent, truthful Rev.May 3, 2022 at 7:11 PM
Democrats Energized After Leaked Abortion Decision
Look how excited James gets when talking about killing mostly black and Hispanic babies.
Roger posted this 2 days ago from the Daily Beast.
"Trump’s J.D. Vance Endorsement Looks Flimsier and Flimsier"
BIDENOMICS
"Already frustrated and angry about high gasoline prices, many Americans are being hit by rapidly rising electricity bills, compounding inflation’s financial toll on people and businesses.
The national average residential electricity rate was up 8 percent in January from a year earlier, the biggest annual increase in more than a decade."
Blogger KansasDemocrat said...
Look how excited James gets when talking about killing mostly black and Hispanic babies.
A completely unnecessary comment.
The issue is who makes law, “government of the people, by the people for the people” or 9 people in black robes.
Pedo goes for 9 potentates, he really doesn’t trust nor understand the mantra he so frequently, naively and stupidly chants
The court was exactly right, to put this back where it belongs, in the legislative branch. It’s time they manned up, both sides
Sorry manned up or one of the other 87 genders
I’m so over the issue. I was at a county commissioner meeting a couple years back and one brought up her/it’s/his support of Roe to prove his/her/it’s bonafides, several neighbors in their flannel Indigo Girls Tshirts were nodding their heads in deep agreement, “I’m like are you going to expand the infrastructure after you approved this multi family use development near me. You’re never getting a say in Roe, shut up.”
The girls later said that was pretty simple how I viewed the topic, I don’t care I’m over the topic after 50 fucking years, then they hopped in their Subaru and drove off. They give me fresh eggs, from their chicken coupe because the chickens drive our dogs nuts and I trade a few shishito peppers with them
Obviously SCOTUS didn’t resolve the issue, it’s time the legislative does
Most people don't base their vote on abortion. Especially when they're losing their wealth and income to inflation and are under attack by this administration just for being suburban parents who question runaway school boards.
BREITBART
ROE LEAKMINISTRY OF TRUTHBIDENFLATIONUKRAINE WAROPEN BORDERTRANSANITYMASTERS OF THE UNIVERSE
*** Election Night Livewire *** Ohio, Indiana Primaries Set Tone for Future of GOP, Test Trump Endorsement StrengthAP Photo/Joe Maiorana, File
MATTHEW BOYLE3 May 2022Washington, DC2,900
17:09
Voters in Indiana and Ohio will decide who will represent them in November’s general elections in the primaries in both states on Tuesday, setting the tone in particular for the future of the Republican party and testing former President Donald Trump’s endorsement strength in a big way.
Trump has 22 endorsements on the line across both states on Tuesday, some in competitive races and others in not-so-competitive primaries. The biggest banner race of the night is the five-way GOP primary for U.S. Senate in Ohio, where Trump has endorsed author J.D. Vance–a hardcore nationalist populist–against four other candidates, three of whom sought Trump’s backing and one of whom did not. Those other candidates–Mike Gibbons, Josh Mandel, Jane Timken, and Matt Dolan–all represent different views on the future of the GOP than Trump in varying degrees, but Dolan in particular represents a major departure from Trump’s view for the party. That’s why it was particularly interesting on Tuesday morning to see Dolan’s wife and some top national leftists like Daily Kos urging Ohio Democrats to pull GOP ballots and vote for Dolan in the primary on Tuesday.
Success for Vance would spell good news for Trump-endorsed candidates in other upcoming primaries, such as those in North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Georgia, and elsewhere, where some have struggled and some have prospered. That’s because Vance shot to the front of the pack in the final weeks of the race in polling after Trump backed him, despite an all-out effort against him from some in the donor class and establishment. Whoever wins the GOP nomination for Senate in Ohio will likely face Rep. Tim Ryan (D-OH) in the general election, a tougher-than-it-looks race given Ryan’s push to portray himself as tough on China.
Ohio’s Senate primary is hardly the only big race of the night. Several competitive congressional primaries in both Ohio and Indiana will also test Trump’s endorsement and offer insight into how the GOP’s future will look. What’s more, Ohio GOP Gov. Mike DeWine aims to fend off two primary challengers–former Rep. Jim Renacci (R-OH) and Joe Blystone–something polling indicates he is likely to do. Seeing whether the polls are right and DeWine can seal the deal will also say a lot about the party– in different respects than Trump’s endorsement will, but also in an interesting way.
These elections are the first, too, since the unprecedented leak of a draft decision from the U.S. Supreme Court indicating that Justices are likely to overturn Roe v. Wade later this year, so how that affects things electorally may or may not be apparent in certain results on Tuesday evening
If the Democrats make the next election as a referendum on the crazy GOP candidates and Donald Trump, they can pull it off
Far-right takes a victory lap as JD Vance begins grueling general election battle against Tim Ryan
Bob Brigham
May 04, 2022
Venture capitalist J.D. Vance's victory in the Ohio Senate primary resulted in celebrations by many on the far-right.
Vance, who was endorsed by Donald Trump, beat out state Sen. Matt Dolan, former Treasurer Josh Mandal, businessman Mike Gibbons, former GOP chairwoman Jane Timken, Mike Pukita, and Neil Patel.
The Daily Beast reported on Vance's victory party.
"Vance, who doubtlessly owes his victory to Trump, also extended his graces to several MAGA allies who came to his side in the campaign’s final weeks. They included Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA), Fox News talk show host Tucker Carlson, conspiracy theorist Charlie Kirk, and Donald Trump Jr. He did not mention Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL), who teamed up with Vance and Greene at recent rallies and who is under federal investigation for sex crimes," The Beast reported.
But Gaetz addressed the election on Twitter, calling it a "big win" for Greene's campaign team.
He also posted of photo of him talking to Fox News with Green and Vance, writing, "not tired of winning."
Trump Jr. also celebrated.
"Tens of millions of RINO dollars spent to stop my man [Vance] in Ohio and they call it before 9 o’clock. The America First movement is alive and well people. Congrats JD, well done," Trump, Jr. said.
But Vance's victory could allow an opening for Rep. Tim Ryan, who secured the Democratic Party nomination on Tuesday.
Contraception could come under fire next after Roe v Wade is overturned
A reckoning with what the 14th amendment enshrines could affect consensual sex and even marriage rights
Melody Schreiber
Wed 4 May 2022 02.00 EDT
Following the bombshell release of a draft decision showing a majority of US supreme court justices may overturn Roe v Wade, legal experts believe other laws about individual autonomy may be in danger, including the right to access contraception.
US shaken to its core by supreme court draft that would overturn Roe v Wade
Read more
Laws broadly banning abortion may also prohibit certain forms of birth control that opponents incorrectly say are working as abortion-causing medications. And the supreme court decision underpinning the right to access contraception, Griswold v Connecticut, could also come under fire in much the same way as Roe did.
Advertisement
“If this [draft] opinion becomes the opinion of the court, Griswold is imperiled – no question,” said Wendy Parmet, faculty co-director for the Center for Health Policy and Law at Northeastern University.
Justice Samuel Alito, in his draft decision, argues that Roe is a faulty law. Roe is based on the 14th amendment, as are decisions like Obergefell v Hodges on same-sex marriage, Loving v Virginia on interracial marriage, and Lawrence v Texas on consensual sex.
“The opinion doesn’t read like Roe was a wrongful tangent of the foundation” within the 14th Amendment, Parmet said. “It really reads like the foundation was inappropriate and unfounded. So judges are going to find it hard to make the distinction with contraception.”
While Alito expressly states that similar laws are safe because they are not about “moral” issues as he says abortion is, there’s no reason the same logic couldn’t be applied to other legal decisions, experts say.
“
If the draft becomes the real opinion, all of those issues – contraception, consensual sex and marriage rights – certainly are all at risk,” said Priscilla Smith, lecturer on law and reproductive justice at Yale Law School. “They have definitely left the door wide open.”
‘Betrayal’: chief justice orders inquiry into leak of draft abortion ruling
Read more
The right to abortion is not explicit in the constitution, Alito argues in the draft. (That’s partly because at the time of the framing, abortion was legal in the US before “quickening,” when the movements of a fetus are first felt.) Similarly, contraception is not mentioned specifically in the constitution, so strict interpretations of rights could exclude it.
Advertisement
“There are a lot of decisions that follow from the idea of a constitutional right to privacy,” Parmet said. “Once you throw down the best-known decision in that category of cases, every single other case is now up for grabs.”
The right to access contraception may not be challenged on its own, but it could be taken up under strict abortion laws – both new laws being introduced as well as older state laws on the books prior to Roe.
Anti-abortion advocates have argued incorrectly that certain birth control methods, such as Plan B and certain intrauterine devices (IUDs), work as abortifacients because they may prevent the implantation of fertilized eggs. But there is no pregnancy without implantation, so these medications cannot terminate pregnancies.
Even so, it’s “definitely possible” that some states may criminally prosecute people who provide contraception that they claim are abortifacients, Smith said, “because there are definitely states that would like to ban abortion from the moment of conception, which means before fertilization, before pregnancy”.
Advertisement
Some states could take these measures further to ban other forms of contraceptives.
“There’s definitely going to be a huge push by the anti-abortion world to take this as far as they can,” Smith said.
“There is a whole wing of this group that is opposed to abortion who only support sexual intercourse when it is within the context of marriage and when it is designed to procreate. The use of contraception gets in the way of that.”
Nationally, anti-abortion advocates are “setting the stage not just for a reversal of protections for abortion, but also for protection for the right to fetal life – the fetus being a person with a right to life guaranteed under the constitution,” Smith said.
“That’s where we’re going if things don’t change
The Democrats have descended into the ninth circle of hell. They are willing to destroy the nation rather than see Trump’s MAGA movement succeed anywhere.
The Biden regime has embraced the tactics of Marx and Mao and the prescient fantasies of George Orwell to gain and maintain control over the American population, all the while importing millions of migrants from around the world into the country. Biden seems intent upon ruining the country by any means possible. He’s rendered us energy dependent again so that Americans are paying $6+ for gas. Inflation is soaring, dragging us into a recession, likely depression. This sad state of affairs was fodder for comedy at the WHCD; Biden heartily laughed at the misery he has stoked.
Biden and the military industrial complex wanted this war in Ukraine and are escalating it. The Ukrainian people are cannon fodder in a dangerously misguided attempt to take down Putin. The warmongers are at it again, briefly interrupted by President Trump, the arms dealers want a war. Now the administration is depleting the American defensive arms inventory by shipping them to Ukraine and sending billions of taxpayer dollars that simply do not exist, money that, if it did exist, could be spent on protecting our southern border, not Ukraine’s eastern border. Ukraine is a European problem, not an American responsibility.
All this chaos and destruction is due to the catastrophic consequences of a stolen election. Purposeful? Indeed. The Biden administration’s agenda is the destruction of America, its middle and working classes and the power of its currency. Biden is bowing to China, Russia and for inexplicable reasons intent upon letting Iran have nukes. Each of those countries are mortal enemies of the US but each with leverage over this terrible President. He has sold out his country for unearned wealth. There are volumes of evidence, proof actually, that the 2020 election was grossly fraudulent. Who among our numerous law enforcement agencies will go to bat for the American people? Someone has got to go to prison. Every American needs to see 2000 Mules.
Voter ID very popular
SO IS WOMEN'S RIGHT TO CHOOSE!!!!!
The Democrats have descended into the ninth circle of hell. They are willing to destroy the nation rather than see Trump’s MAGA movement succeed anywhere.
Stolen from that great bastion of stupid ass R'a AMERICAN STINKER!!!!!!!! BWAAAAAAPAAAAAA!!!!
Blogger KansasDemocrat said...
Roger has 4,500 "Facebook" friends.
WHILE YOUR BEST FRIEND IS YOUR GOAT!!!!!!! BWAAAAAAPAAAAAA!!!
Blogger The Real Halfbaked Soars Pundit said...
Contraception could come under fire next after Roe v Wade is overturned
A reckoning with what the 14th amendment enshrines could affect consensual sex and even marriage rights
That's right alky.
And I have it on good authority that Justice Clarence Thomas is leading the charge to make inter-racial marriage illegal.
I mean, if you and the histrionic left are going to go full-retard apeshit, go big or go home, right? Do you clowns know any logic that isn't completely fucking tortured?
LOL.
Note to self: Buy stock in fainting couch manufacturers.
How to get the alky to fall for any line of completely asinine and tortured logic:
Include the two most magical words...
"Experts say."
Works every fucking time.
LOL.
What is sad about moving it back to the states....the GOP will now try to introduce law for all 50 states to ban abortion completely which negates moving the issue back to the states!!!!! I see a jumble of 50 different laws and policies that will cause much confusion and costs for all.....Yes, you won, but will we better off or more broken than ever?????
the GOP will now try to introduce law for all 50 states to ban abortion completely which negates moving the issue back to the states!!!!! I see a jumble of 50 different laws and policies that will cause much confusion and costs for all.....
What an ass-backwards way of looking at it.
The reason we're even having this conversation is because the USSC did a complete end run around the legislative process and ruled by judicial fiat.
In Roe, democracy was NOT allowed to prevail and the people were NOT allowed to decide.
We're at the point of having a barely functioning representative republic because the left demands that all of their wishes, wants and desires are bestowed upon the populace by judicial fiat, completely circumventing the legislative process. Hence the gnashing of teeth and rending of garments over every single USSC opening and subsequent nomination.
If the bulk of the left's policy demands weren't so fucking unpopular to begin with, they could be addressed as constitutionally designed - legislatively, BY THE PEOPLE.
The jumping off point for this entire conversation is to accept the fundamental FACT that Roe was never law but only a RULING.
Let's start there. and let's engage the legislative process to determine the outcome of Roe.
If Alito's ruling is allowed to stand, not a single American has lost a "right." You've lost at best a privilege bestowed upon you by the same folks you claim to abhor and wish to have no voice in the matter -
Nine elite WHITE MEN.
returning it to the states is and always was the best path. Abortion advocates need to state their case and sell it to the American electorate. As we do with all other issues we codify into law. or NOT.
To coin a favorite leftist phrase -
This is what democracy looks like!!!11!
What an ass-backwards way of looking at it.
BWAAAAAAAAAA!!!!! Tell that to Ernst who is writing the legislation!!!!!!!!! She's your cunt who is out to prove white supremacy!!!! Please rat .....try to keep up with your fucked up party!!!!!
https://www.forbes.com/sites/alisondurkee/2022/05/02/republicans-will-try-to-ban-abortion-nationwide-if-supreme-court-overturns-roe-v-wade-report-reveals/?sh=47628d6c23ed
Tell that to Ernst who is writing the legislation!!!!!!!!!
I'd be happy to, and this is exactly why I consider you to be a fucking moron.
What is Ernst doing?
Writing LEGISLATION. To be VOTED upon. By the PEOPLE'S REPRESENTATIVES.
This is how it's SUPPOSED TO WORK, you dumb fuck.
To be VOTED upon. By the PEOPLE'S REPRESENTATIVES.
Which to dumb fucks like you think is better????? BWAAAAAAPAAAAAA!!!!!! A national ban on abortion is what you dumb fucks want!@!!!!! Like trump winning the last election......Fuck women just like Alitio whose rational that historically, women have to obey the laws of men......who have banned abortion in the past and never gave the right of choice!!!!! Gee, i guess taking liberty away from half the population is fine for someone with no dog in the fight, just hatred of women!!!!
The Supreme Court's forthcoming abortion ruling will put Corporate America in a vise, squeezed between employees pressuring companies to speak out and state governments that might punish them if they do.
The big picture: Companies have gotten significantly more outspoken on a host of political and social issues. Abortion was a tougher one to begin with, and a Supreme Court ruling striking down Roe v. Wade is likely to come just as big corporations are growing more afraid of how much their activism can cost them.
Driving the news: Disney pushed up against the limits of corporate activism when it spoke out against Florida's so-called "Don't Say Gay" law, and faced harsh retribution from the state. That will be on executives' minds as they wrestle with the fallout from an abortion ruling.
"Disney was a real wake up call for a lot of big companies," said Doug Pinkham, the president of the Public Affairs Council, a Washington-based group that advises companies on political and policy engagement.Companies are in a "quandary" now, he said. On one side you have an increasingly young and educated white-collar workforce urging them to take a stand. On the other hand is the risk of alienating powerful lawmakers in the states where big companies do business."A lot of times these companies are based in New York City or California or Chicago; they're a lot more liberal than the rest of the country is. They say what they say and then the shitstorm happens," a Republican lobbyist told Axios.
What they're saying: "It's a pivotal moment for corporate America to be on the front lines with women and others," said Noreen Farrell, executive director of Equal Rights Advocates. Her group is reaching out to companies and urging them to make statements affirming reproductive rights.
"I think that this SCOTUS leak will wake up a lot more companies who have been sort of dreading this day of reckoning and putting it off for too long," said Shelley Alpern, a director of corporate engagement at Rhia Ventures, whose been talking to companies for years about reproductive rights.
Where it stands: Starting in 2019, a handful of companies signed on to the Don't Ban Equality statement, protesting a wave of "heartbeat bills" that restricted abortion. Then this year, after Texas essentially banned abortion, more companies spoke up.
Citi, Apple, Yelp, and Amazon have said they would pay for employees to travel to access abortion care when they need to.There might be more companies quietly doing this: A large retailer recently agreed to offer an abortion benefit to its workers, according to Alpern, who said she was prohibited from naming them publicly.
Zoom out: Forcing the issue is an extremely tight labor market and a push by many large companies to return to in-person office work.
Companies are desperate to attract and retain talent, and any policy measure that makes that more difficult can be a huge problem.
The bottom line: "For most companies I've talked to, their guiding star is their employees," a prominent Democratic lobbyist told Axios.
"Businesses have core values, but they also are capitalists, and they're gonna say, in a state that has, let's say, an absolute ban on all abortions, including [in cases of] rape and incest, ... can I get employees to come work there?"
Sad rat.....you think writing a national aborttion ban by the GOP is better.......BWAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!! You projecting your views to th 80% who want to maintain Roe is amusing considering you got no skin in the game, just plain hatred of women and anything not white supremacist!!!!! No explanation need why I think you are not only fucked up, but dangerous!!!!!!!! LOLOLOL
What they're saying: "It's a pivotal moment for corporate America to be on the front lines with women and others," said Noreen Farrell, executive director of Equal Rights Advocates. Her group is reaching out to companies and urging them to make statements affirming reproductive rights.
Translation: Fall in line and do what we say or we will make your lives a living fucking HELL.
Blackmail.
Ironic, as it's the antithesis of the "democracy" the left is always claiming is "at stake."
Blogger anonymous said...
Sad rat.....you think writing a national aborttion ban by the GOP is better.......
No stupid, I think following the legislative process is better.
IT'S OBVIOUS CH AND THE GOP WANT TO AVOID THE ABORTION ISSUE
Taking Away Rights
May 4, 2022 at 7:57 am EDT By Taegan Goddard 16 Comments
Ruth Marcus:
“The court has overruled decisions before,
but it has never removed an existing, established constitutional right.
Now, we have every reason to believe it is prepared to do so, and in a way that would give states maximum leeway. If the draft becomes the law of the land,
state legislatures will be free to restrict all abortion, in almost all circumstances.”
AND SOME WILL, EVEN FOR RAPE AND INCEST.
Minority Women Have Most to Lose in Abortion Ruling
May 4, 2022 at 7:41 am EDT By Taegan Goddard 29 Comments
“If you are Black or Hispanic in a conservative state that already limits access to abortions, you are far more likely than a white woman to have one,”
the AP reports.
“And if the U.S. Supreme court allows states to further restrict or even ban abortions, minority women will bear the brunt of it.”
SUDDENLY GOP STEERS CLEAR OF ABORTION POLITICS
May 4, 2022 at 7:30 am EDT By Taegan Goddard 54 Comments
“Senate Republicans gathered behind closed doors on Tuesday afternoon for the first time since a bombshell draft Supreme Court decision that would strike down Roe v. Wade was leaked,” CNN reports.
“But rather than celebrating a milestone that most of them have spent decades trying to achieve — banning abortion —
Republicans instead focused on another issue:
How the document became public, underscoring the political sensitivity of their potential and long-awaited victory.”
YEP, THEY ARE WORRIED ABOUT THAT "POLITICAL SENSITIVITY" AND HERE'S WHY:
Most Americans Favor Right to Abortion
May 4, 2022 at 7:29 am EDT By Taegan Goddard 17 Comments
A new Politico/Morning Consult poll finds
57% of voters want the Supreme Court to support abortion rights, 28% hope it opposes them, and 15% don’t know or have no opinion.
In addition, 56% of voters believe abortion should be legal in “most” or “all cases,”
25% of voters said they think abortion should be legal in all cases,
31% said legal in most cases,
24% said illegal in most cases,
11% said illegal in all cases, and
9% either don’t know or had no opinion.
A recent Wall Street Journal poll found that
55% of voters said they wanted abortion to be legal in all or most cases, while
30% said it should be illegal except in cases involving rape or incest or when the life of the mother is in danger, and
11% said it should be illegal in all circumstances.
Amazon to Reimburse Employees Who Travel for Abortion
May 4, 2022 at 7:59 am EDT By Taegan Goddard 15 Comments
“Amazon.com, the second-largest U.S. private employer, told its staff on Monday it will pay up to $4,000 in travel expenses annually for non-life threatening medical treatments including abortions,”
Reuters reports.
THE GOP HAS AWAKENED A SLEEPING, NOW ANGRY TIGER.
NOT BEING DELETED TODAY?
Following the will of the minority is okay in your world...????? If the process was unfettered.....there would still be protection for women of all shapes and sizes....the minority like you and ernst would be pounding sand instead of directing the majority to bend to your will....which is exactly what is going on as the 5 judge majority all fucking lied to congress about overturning decided law!!!!! Susan Collins who voted for the assholes now regrets her votes and calls them what they are.....frauds who lied to congress to achieve their goals.......the GOP way.....lie cheat and scream gets what you want....
THEY LIED.
TRUMP LIES.
THE GOP LIES.
The left lies when they claim to respect democracy and the legislative process.
The only way they can advance their agenda is by judicial fiat.
That's fascism.
HITLER LIED.
MUSSOLINI LIED.
TRUMP LIES.
THE GOP LIES.
PUTIN LIES.
THAT'S FASCISM.
GOOD!
Indiana GOP Lawmakers Hold Off Hard-Right Challenge
May 4, 2022 at 7:28 am EDT By Taegan Goddard 1 Comment
“Frustrated Indiana conservatives fell short in most primary races Tuesday in their drive to push the Republican-controlled state Legislature further to the right, and two of the movement’s leaders lost their reelection bids,”
the AP reports.
“The roughly two dozen so-called liberty candidates saw only a few victories in Republican legislative races across the state, with one defeating a 10-term incumbent in northern Indiana and two others winning nominations for GOP-leaning open seats.”
THE RETURN OF ABORTION POLITICS
May 4, 2022 at 6:48 am EDT By Taegan Goddard 27 Comments
“Before Monday evening, when Politico scooped that the landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling was on the verge of being overturned by the conservative majority on the Supreme Court, abortion was barely registering as a blip on the political radar,” the Punchbowl News reports.
“The big, overwhelming issues for 2022 were the economy, inflation, Covid-19, crime, immigration and Ukraine, according to numerous polls. Economic concerns – driven by soaring gas, food and housing prices – were what Americans wanted Congress and President Joe Biden to address, and Democrats were getting clobbered over their failure to do so.”
BUT NOW
Threat to Roe v. Wade Stuns, Then Energizes Americans
May 4, 2022 at 6:44 am EDT By Taegan Goddard 20 Comments
“Opponents and supporters of abortion rights had expected for months that the Supreme Court would vote to overturn Roe v. Wade, but the leaked draft opinion late Monday came as if out of the blue, setting off shock, outrage and jubilation on both sides of the nation’s deeply polarized abortion debate,”
the New York Times reports.
“Activists took to the streets to declare their intention to fight harder,
especially over control of Congress in this year’s midterm elections.
Candidates sought to raise money off the news.
And in states that are poised to ban abortion or guard access to it, politicians and governors declared that they were ready to act.”
“Yet many Americans woke up stunned, not realizing — and some still not believing — that Roe and the constitutional right to an abortion that it has guaranteed for five decades could disappear within a matter of weeks.”
THE CHOCOLATE HAS NOT YET REALLY HIT THE FAN.
Washington Post:
“A ruling on abortion rights could turn the campaign into a massive mobilizing effort over the issues of abortion,
individual rights
and the contrasting philosophies
of the two major political parties.”
Once again, Turley nails it:
From Packing to Sacking, Democrats Pledge Politics “By Any Means Necessary”
https://jonathanturley.org/2021/12/20/from-packing-the-supreme-court-to-sacking-the-senate-clerk-democrats-pledge-politics-by-any-means-necessary/
After egregiously packing the Supreme Court, the GOP has little right to complain if the Dems do that now.
Blogger Honest, decent, truthful Rev. said...
After egregiously packing the Supreme Court, the GOP has little right to complain if the Dems do that now.
Why do you feel so compelled to LIE, pederast.
The number of justices on the USSC remains at 9.
In other news, Trump endorsed 22 primary candidates last night.
They ALL WON.
What was that about Obama's nominee?
Fuck off pederast you don’t even know how the constitutional amendment process works.
Crawl back in your hole of stupid and spare the rest of us your monotonous copy and pasting
Indiana GOP Lawmakers Hold Off Hard-Right Challenge
May 4, 2022 at 7:28 am EDT By Taegan Goddard 1 Comment
“Frustrated Indiana conservatives fell short in most primary races Tuesday in their drive to push the Republican-controlled state Legislature further to the right, and two of the movement’s leaders lost their reelection bids,”
the AP reports.
“The roughly two dozen so-called liberty candidates saw only a few victories in Republican legislative races across the state, with one defeating a 10-term incumbent in northern Indiana and two others winning nominations for GOP-leaning open seats.”
What was that about Obama's nominee?
What was that about Obama's nominee?
What was that about Obama's nominee?
What was that about Obama's nominee?
What was that about Obama's nominee?
What was that about Obama's nominee?
I'm being deleted again.
Censorship is the last refuge of a scoundrel.
rrb said...
Blogger Honest, decent, truthful Rev. said...
After egregiously packing the Supreme Court, the GOP has little right to complain if the Dems do that now.
Why do you feel so compelled to LIE, pederast.
The number of justices on the USSC remains at 9.
In other news, Trump endorsed 22 primary candidates last night.
They ALL WON.
The most significant was JD Vance.
Fantastic morning !!!
or mourning if you are a shrinking democrat
they will be screaming until they go hoarse
guess they have something that the lives they abort don't have
Oh, look who shows up right after I get deleted.
Packing the SCOTUS.
What was that about Obama's nominee?
Oh, look who shows up right after I get deleted.
Blogger Honest, decent, truthful Rev. said...
What was that about Obama's nominee?
Garland?
Mitch followed the process to the letter and blocked his appointment, as was his right to do.
You're just pissed that you didn't get your way, so once again you need to go around the legislative process.
There's not a dime's worth of difference between you and a child having a temper tantrum.
Oh, look who shows up right as I am being deleted.
Caliphate4vr said...
Fuck off pederast you don’t even know how the constitutional amendment process works.
Crawl back in your hole of stupid and spare the rest of us your monotonous copy and pasting
and he's back to repeating posts and complaining about being censored
go complain to google
they manage the software
as you have been told
and as CHT explained "deletions" are logged on the software with the source
now fuck off
Oh look who shows up right as I am being deleted.
Oh look who shows up right as I am being deleted.
Oh look who shows up right as I am being deleted.
Oh look who shows up right as I am being deleted.
Oh look who shows up right as I am being deleted.
Oh look who shows up right as I am being deleted.
Oh look who shows up right as I am being deleted.
1775 - Marc J. Randazza
Compelling page of witnessing an abortion:
https://twitter.com/marcorandazza/status/1521589562845413377
This, by Dr. Ron Paul, challenges my beliefs about personal autonomy, liberty, and abortion. I share it *because* it challenges my beliefs.
How people can accept this is beyond me
Certainly not religious people
Garland?
Mitch followed the process to the letter and blocked his appointment, as was his right to do.
You're just pissed that you didn't get your way, so once again you need to go around the legislative process.
There's not a dime's worth of difference between you and a child having a temper tantrum.
He does not understand in the least, how our form of government works. Clueless
The child is more rational
You're just pissed that you didn't get your way, so once again you need to go around the legislative process.
There's not a dime's worth of difference between you and a child having a temper tantrum
and when the software here isn't working properly (and we all know it by now) he blames CHT
and me
not the company who runs and maintains the software
and who happen to be an evil company
I do wonder what they are up to
but the POS "pastor" is a clueless "victim" acting like a child
and relentlessly crying and continuing his Goddard obsession
He does not understand in the least, how our form of government works. Clueless
The child is more rational
And to think this lying dumb fuck had a following. Poor stupid people lining up to be fleeced each Sunday.
"Pastor" my ass. Grifter or Con Man is more accurate.
King Donald is back.
“Mr. Vance’s win will likely come as a disappointment to some Republicans who have been quietly hoping that Mr. Trump’s grip on the party is slipping. They see the midterms as an existential moment for the party. They are acutely aware that if the candidates he endorsed do well, the feeling of inevitability that he will be the party’s nominee in 2024 increases, annihilating any hope of reconstituting a political coalition around anything other than fealty to Mr. Trump…”
“Yet conservatives must be honest. At this time, there is no moving past Mr. Trump. He has remade the Republican Party in his image, and many Republican voters now crave his particular brand of combative politics.”
“In races across the country, Republicans who have won Mr. Trump’s endorsement mention it constantly. Even those who didn’t win his endorsement still mention him constantly. Mr. Trump might not have endorsed them, but they all endorse him.”
The slow motion coup is back 🙌
WASHINGTON, May 4 (Reuters) - The Federal Reserve on Wednesday is expected to raise interest rates by half of a percentage point and announce the start of reductions to its $9 trillion balance sheet as U.S. central bankers intensify efforts to bring down high inflation.
Fed policymakers have widely telegraphed a double-barreled decision that would lift the Fed's short-term target policy rate to a range between 0.75% and 1%, and set in motion a plan to trim its portfolio of Treasuries and mortgage-backed securities (MBS) by as much $95 billion a month.
Report ad
The policy statement is due to be released at 2 p.m. EDT (1800 GMT) following the end of the Fed's latest two-day meeting.
Markets have priced in further rate increases through this year and into next, including three more half-percentage-point hikes, as traders bet the central bank moves much more quickly than it had anticipated it would in March to get borrowing costs up to where they will start actively curbing inflation.
Report ad
With no fresh Fed economic or policy rate projections due until the central bank's June meeting, most clues on how far and how fast it is prepared to go will come from Fed Chair Jerome Powell's news conference, which starts at 2:30 p.m. EDT.
The Fed began its current round of policy tightening in mid-March with a quarter-percentage-point rate hike, smaller than many policymakers had wanted given inflation had hit a 40-year high, but calibrated so as not to inject more uncertainty into global markets roiled by Russia's Feb. 24 invasion of Ukraine.
Report ad
In the weeks since that decision, inflation has gained new steam as the war pushed up oil and food prices and China's strict lockdowns to combat the spread of COVID-19 further disrupted supply chains.
Data on the U.S. labor market also suggests increasing labor market tightness, with employment costs surging as businesses struggle to hold onto workers. A record number of job openings may also translate to higher wages that could also feed through to inflation.
The slow motion coup is back
I'd say leaking Supreme Court deliberations is more than a slow motion coup
it's a full blown assault on democracy
a real insurrection
cheered by democrats
I guess they should all be thrown in jail next to the 1/6 protestors
and get in line behind them for "justice"
If it works the economy will slow down, but probably won't go into a recession.
Because underneath is strong demand for goods and services.
actually when you post now (at least on a desktop) you can see google.com intercepting the post.... interesting...
well I saw it on the previous post, not this one??
probably cursor position ?
The Pope wants to know Putin
ROME—Since the beginning of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, Pope Francis has floated the idea that he wants to take a trip to Kyiv to try to broker a ceasefire. But now he says he would prefer to go to Moscow to try to talk some sense into Vladimir Putin, who he has not outwardly condemned in the now nearly three-month-old war and only did so lightly in a lengthy interview with an Italian newspaper.
“I feel that before going to Kyiv, I must go to Moscow,” he told Corriere Della Sera in an interview that ran Tuesday. But the meeting would not exactly be to condemn Putin, based on what he told the paper. He said that the real “scandal” of Putin’s war is “NATO barking at Russia’s door,” which he said caused the Kremlin to “react badly and unleash the conflict.”
Never mind that the 85-year-old pontiff is unable to walk after tearing a ligament in his knee (for which he says he will soon have surgery), or that Putin won’t even answer his calls. Francis repeated comments he has made in general audiences and in other interviews that the war is nothing more than a giant opportunity for a “trade in arms” and that it is still ongoing because of the constant shuttling of weapons to Ukraine. He has spoken twice by phone to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, but mostly to urge him not to fight back. He also went to the Russian embassy to the Holy See days after the invasion began to “register his concerns” about what was happening.
From 37m ago
09.45
An overwhelming majority of Americans are in favor of preserving abortion rights, two new polls have found, as the US supreme court moves towards ending almost half a century of protections.
A Politico/Morning Consult study found voters are two to one in favor of preserving the 1973 Roe v Wade opinion that safeguarded protected women’s access to abortions.
The poll conducted Tuesday, shortly after Politico’s bombshell publication of the draft ruling from the supreme court overturning Roe, showed exactly 50% of respondents wanted it maintained. 28% wanted it overturned, and 22% were undecided.
A separate Washington Post/ABC poll reports 54% in favor of preserving Roe, and 28% against, while an even higher number of Americans, 70%, think abortion is a private issue between patient and doctor.
The figures are sure to bolster Democrats who plan to campaign on the abortion issue for the upcoming midterm elections. While the party is unlikely to be able to pass legislation enshrining abortion rights because of opposition in the Senate, its base will be fired up by a wave of resistance, already manifesting itself in protests taking place nationwide.
“Those Republican leaders who are trying to weaponize the use of the law against women, we say, ‘How dare they? How dare they tell a woman what she can and cannot do with her own body?’” vice-president Kamala Harris said at a conference on women’s reproductive rights in Washington DC on Tuesday night.
Vice-president Kamala Harris speaks at the Emily’s List national gala in Washington DC on Tuesday evening. Photograph: Yuri Gripas/UPI/REX/Shutterstock
Joe Biden is going further, warning on Tuesday that more freedoms could be at risk.
“It would mean that every other decision relating to the notion of privacy is thrown into question,” the president told reporters on Tuesday of the draft ruling.
“If what is written is what remains, it goes far beyond the concern of whether or not there is the right to choose. It goes to other basic rights, who you marry... whether or not you decide to conceive a child, whether or not you can have an abortion, a range of other decisions, how you raise your child.”
According to the Politico poll, 68% of Democrats and 52% of independents say Roe should not be overturned, and a narrow majority of Republicans, 51%, believe it should.
And as numerous Republican controlled states introduce or harden anti-abortion legislation in expectation of the supreme court’s final ruling, due in late June or July, a majority of respondents in the Washington Post/ABC poll say they are moving in the wrong direction.
Asked if their state should make abortion easier to access, 33% said yes, 25% said it should be harder, and 36% want it left as it is.
According to the Politico poll, 68% of Democrats and 52% of independents say Roe should not be overturned, and a narrow majority of Republicans, 51%, believe it should.
We are witnessing the result of when we stopped teaching civics, and started teaching "social studies."
The memo does not address overturning Roe. The memo DOES address returning the issue to the states to be dealt with via the constitutional legislative process instead of the extra-constitutional process of judicial fiat.
Everything a leftist touches turns to shit, and every single narrative promoted by a leftist is a FALSE narrative.
Anonymous James's Fucking Daddy said...
actually when you post now (at least on a desktop) you can see google.com intercepting the post.... interesting...
Which is precisely why you do not want a nest thermostat or doorbell in your house, or one of those creepy fucking "hey google" speakers.
Google IS evil.
‘How dare they? How dare
Oh goodie
Our veep is Greta ‘fetal alcohol poisoning’ Thunberg. About right
Sad that you fucks on the right have been working 50 years to get rid of Roe are now playing the victim because of the leak!!!! Sad commentary for the GOP who leads nothing but vitriol against women's liberty to live free!!!!!
Overturning ‘Roe’ Is Radical, Not Conservative
May 4, 2022 at 11:00 am EDT By Taegan Goddard 10 Comments
Bret Stephens:
“A half-century is a long time. America is a different place, with most of its population born after Roe was decided. And a decision to overturn Roe — which the court seems poised to do, according to the leak of a draft of a majority opinion from Justice Samuel Alito — would do more to replicate Roe’s damage than to reverse it.
“It would be a radical, not conservative, choice.
“What is conservative? It is, above all, the conviction that abrupt and profound changes to established laws and common expectations are utterly destructive to respect for the law and the institutions established to uphold it — especially when those changes are instigated from above, with neither democratic consent nor broad consensus.”
“This is partly a matter of stare decisis, but not just that. As conservatives, you are philosophically bound to give considerable weight to judicial precedents, especially when they have been ratified and refined — as Roe was by the 1992 Planned Parenthood v. Casey decision — over a long period. The fact that Casey somewhat altered the original scheme of Roe, a point Justice Alito makes much of in his draft opinion, doesn’t change the fact that the court broadly upheld the right to an abortion. ‘Casey is precedent on precedent,’ as Justice Kavanaugh aptly put it in his confirmation hearing.”
AND HE WAS LYING, PRETENDING HE BELIEVED THAT.
especially when those changes are instigated from above, with neither democratic consent nor broad consensus.”
Boy that’s rich.
Live by the court, die by court
"...especially when those changes are instigated from above, with neither democratic consent nor broad consensus.”
There is "NO broad consensus" for not allowing women and their physicians to make their own choices about pregnancy.
Americans will not accept this GOP attempt to dictate to them.
Ch, don't pretend that I have not been deleted again, several times this morning.
Earlier today I received a notice in red lettering that said,
"You have exceeded the number of posts allowed for today. Please try again tomorrow" and was blocked until recently.
If you are not doing that, someone is. Someone has hacked you and is deleting posts.
And it only happens when certain people are present, or just before they show up.
Censorship is the last refuge of a scoundrel.
The fact that Casey somewhat altered the original scheme of Roe, a point Justice Alito makes much of in his draft opinion, doesn’t change the fact that the court broadly upheld the right to an abortion. ‘Casey is precedent on precedent,’ as Justice Kavanaugh aptly put it in his confirmation hearing.”
AND HE WAS LYING, PRETENDING HE BELIEVED THAT.
Pederast,
Show us where it is written that judicial precedent prevents a ruling from being overturned.
And he was not "lying" by declaring it precedent and still supporting overturning the ruling.
The extend to which you assholes have to torture logic and the english language never ceases to amaze.
And if Roe is as popular as the polls the left is claiming indicate, then you guys should have no worry with going through the constitutional legislative process to have it codified into law.
Returning the issue to the states would not be overturning Roe?
Of course it would be.
stop torturing logic and the english language
Show us where it is written that judicial precedent prevents a ruling from being overturned.
THAT'S NOT THE ISSUE YOU FUCKING LOSER!!!!!! HE LIED TO CONGRESS IN OPEN SESSION AND TO COLLINS IN HER OFFICE!!!! He went back on his word which is not the norm for EVERY fucking R in congress with lying as an added attraction.....Was there massive voter fraud asshole or is that a figment of your believing lies!!!!!
Blogger Honest, decent, truthful Rev. said...
Returning the issue to the states would not be overturning Roe?
Of course it would be.
In 2019 The State of New York codified abortion into law in the state constitution.
Regardless of what happens at the federal level or in another state, you can always come to the Great State of New York to kill your child.
Idiot.
Nothing About the Supreme Court Is Democratic
May 4, 2022 at 10:23 am EDT By Taegan Goddard 175 Comments
Mark Barabak:
“The Supreme Court may be arguably the country’s most important branch of government…
The Supreme Court is also inarguably the least democratic of the three branches, and not just because its members enjoy lifetime tenure and never have to face voters.
“By the narrowest of margins, five justices appear ready to overlook nearly 50 years of precedent and reverse the court’s landmark Roe vs. Wade decision legalizing abortion nationwide — a ruling, polls have consistently shown, is favored by a majority of Americans.
“Three of those justices were nominated by President Trump, who failed to win the popular vote.
"Each was then approved by a Senate that Republicans controlled,
despite the fact the party has represented only a minority of the population for the past quarter-century.”
TIME FOR A RETURN TO DEMOCRACY, NOT
A DICTATORIAL
OLIGARCHY,
AUTOCRACY,
AND
KLEPTOCRACY
IN AMERICA.
Yes, he out and out lied.
He claimed he regarded Roe to be "settled law," established by "precedent upon precedent."
If you are not doing that, someone is. Someone has hacked you and is deleting posts.
And it only happens when certain people are present, or just before they show up.
Censorship is the last refuge of a scoundrel.
I've noticed the only time it happens to me the POS "pastor" is here
of course him and roger are always here
definitely scoundrels
hmmm
stop their traffic and the blog volume would go down 80%
and be much better
Maybe Google is doing us a favor
unwittingly
Rat says women should not be concerned because a young raped girl in southern California who becomes pregnant could always go to New York state for an abortion.
Big Brother is Watching:
CDC Tracked Millions of Phones to See If Americans Followed COVID Lockdown Orders
Newly released documents showed the CDC planned to use phone location data to monitor schools and churches, and wanted to use the data for many non-COVID-19 purposes, too.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) bought access to location data harvested from tens of millions of phones in the United States to perform analysis of compliance with curfews, track patterns of people visiting K-12 schools, and specifically monitor the effectiveness of policy in the Navajo Nation, according to CDC documents obtained by Motherboard. The documents also show that although the CDC used COVID-19 as a reason to buy access to the data more quickly, it intended to use it for more-general CDC purposes.
Location data is information on a device’s location sourced from the phone, which can then show where a person lives, works, and where they went. The sort of data the CDC bought was aggregated—meaning it was designed to follow trends that emerge from the movements of groups of people—but researchers have repeatedly raised concerns with how location data can be deanonymized and used to track specific people.
The documents reveal the expansive plan the CDC had last year to use location data from a highly controversial data broker. SafeGraph, the company the CDC paid $420,000 for access to one year of data, includes Peter Thiel and the former head of Saudi intelligence among its investors. Google banned the company from the Play Store in June.
The CDC used the data for monitoring curfews, with the documents saying that SafeGraph’s data “has been critical for ongoing response efforts, such as hourly monitoring of activity in curfew zones or detailed counts of visits to participating pharmacies for vaccine monitoring.” The documents date from 2021.
Zach Edwards, a cybersecurity researcher who closely follows the data marketplace, told Motherboard in an online chat after reviewing the documents: “The CDC seems to have purposefully created an open-ended list of use cases, which included monitoring curfews, neighbor-to-neighbor visits, visits to churches, schools and pharmacies, and also a variety of analysis with this data specifically focused on ‘violence.’” (The document doesn’t stop at churches; it mentions “places of worship.”)
Motherboard obtained the documents through a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request with the CDC.
The documents contain a long list of what the CDC describes as 21 different “potential CDC use cases for data.” They include:
“Track patterns of those visiting K-12 schools by the school and compare to 2019; compare with epi metrics [Environmental Performance Index] if possible.”
“Examination of the correlation of mobility patterns data and rise in COVID-19 cases [...] Movement restrictions (Border closures, inter-regional and nigh curfews) to show compliance.”
continues:
https://www.vice.com/en/article/m7vymn/cdc-tracked-phones-location-data-curfews
1984
This post got deleted:
Rat says women should not be too concerned because a young girl raped in Southern California can always go to New York state for an abortion.
This post got deleted:
Rat says women should not be too concerned because a young girl raped in Southern California can always go to New York state for an abortion.
This post got deleted:
Rat says women should not be too concerned because a young girl raped in Southern California can always go to New York state for an abortion.
This post got deleted:
Rat says women should not be too concerned because a young girl raped in Southern California can always go to New York state for an abortion.
This post got deleted:
Rat says women should not be too concerned because a young girl raped in Southern California can always go to New York state for an abortion.
“Three of those justices were nominated by President Trump, who failed to win the popular vote.
So?
We never have DUMBASS
Change the constitution or shut the fuck up
You cannot claim that the overthrowing of Roe has popular support. It flies against the often expressed will of the majority of Americans.
So why should I shut up?
Rat says women should not be too concerned because a young girl raped in Southern California can always go to New York state for an abortion.
The abject stupidity that is in this post is unbelievable
Cali is going to outlaw abortions, huh
Fuck you’re dumb
It has nothing to do with how we elect presidents dumbass
And pass a law, idiot
KansasDemocrat said...
Roger posted this 2 days ago from the Daily Beast.
"Trump’s J.D. Vance Endorsement Looks Flimsier and Flimsier"
roger says his sources are "solid"
why did big tech have to censor and ban all reports of election interference ?
Wonder if he's watched 2,000 mules yet.
Got to wonder if the Supreme leak was meant to draw attention away.
scoundrels
It has everything to do with the will of a majority of Americans.
Comment deleted
This comment has been removed by the author.
May 4, 2022 at 11:29 AM
someone is still deleting the POS "pastor's" comments
ROFLMFAO !!!
A majority of Americans did not vote for Trump.
A majority of Americans do not approve of Justices he appointed overthrowing Roe.
It has everything to do with that.
No, I myself removed THAT comment.
When mine get deleted by someone else, it does not appear in the sidebar. Not at all.
BTW, pedo that crass country trek won’t be necessary, you stupid sack of shit. Stick to copy and pasting
California, New York and New Jersey vow to protect abortion rights and say they'll welcome pregnant women 'with open arms' from 26 states where it might become banned in wake of SCOTUS leak
Democratic Governors have vowed to protect abortion rights in their states if Roe v. Wade is struck down
If the Supreme Court confirms that it is striking down the landmark ruling, it paves the way for states to decide on their own abortion laws
26 Republican states are expected to ban abortions if that happens - more than half of the country
California is now proposing a law that enshrines the right to abortion into the state's constitution so that it can never be overturned - even with a different Governor in charge
The Governors of New York and New Jersey say they will welcome pregnant women from other states if they are seeking abortions
Governors of Vermont, Minnesota, Michigan, Oregon and Washington have all promised the same
President Biden on Tuesday said he would enshrine the right to abortion into federal law if it is overturned
Wow passing it through the legislative process as it always should’ve been done.
I guess we’ll get to hear about “abortion deserts” now
This one was also deleted because somebody didn't want you to see it:
Trump was not elected by a majority of Americans.
A majority of Americans do not approve of the Justices he appointed overthrowing Roe.
Republicans have made a big mistake on this issue.
This one was also deleted because somebody didn't want you to see it:
Trump was not elected by a majority of Americans.
A majority of Americans do not approve of the Justices he appointed overthrowing Roe.
Republicans have made a big mistake on this issue.
This one was also deleted because somebody didn't want you to see it:
Trump was not elected by a majority of Americans.
A majority of Americans do not approve of the Justices he appointed overthrowing Roe.
Republicans have made a big mistake on this issue.
This one was also deleted because somebody didn't want you to see it:
Trump was not elected by a majority of Americans.
A majority of Americans do not approve of the Justices he appointed overthrowing Roe.
Republicans have made a big mistake on this issue.
This one was also deleted because somebody didn't want you to see it:
Trump was not elected by a majority of Americans.
A majority of Americans do not approve of the Justices he appointed overthrowing Roe.
Republicans have made a big mistake on this issue.
This one was also deleted because somebody didn't want you to see it:
Trump was not elected by a majority of Americans.
A majority of Americans do not approve of the Justices he appointed overthrowing Roe.
Republicans have made a big mistake on this issue.
This one was also deleted because somebody didn't want you to see it:
Trump was not elected by a majority of Americans.
A majority of Americans do not approve of the Justices he appointed overthrowing Roe.
Republicans have made a big mistake on this issue.
This one was also deleted because somebody didn't want you to see it:
Trump was not elected by a majority of Americans.
A majority of Americans do not approve of the Justices he appointed overthrowing Roe.
Republicans have made a big mistake on this issue.
I myself deleted one of my posts (only one) today to reword it, but I've been deleted several times today.
It only shows up in the sidebar when I do it.
I myself deleted one of my posts today (only one) because I wanted to reword it. I have been deleted several times today, but it only shows up in the sidebar when I do it, not when the coward does it.
To get this post to appear, I will have to repeat this three times.
I myself deleted one of my posts today (only one) because I wanted to reword it. It only shows up in the sidebar when I delete it, not when the coward deletes it.
This post has also been deleted, but I will repeat it three times now to make it stay.
I myself deleted one of my posts today (only one) because I wanted to reword it. It only shows up in the sidebar when I delete it, not when the coward deletes it.
This post has also been deleted, but I will repeat it three times now to make it stay.
I myself deleted one of my posts today (only one) because I wanted to reword it. It only shows up in the sidebar when I delete it, not when the coward deletes it.
This post has also been deleted, but I will repeat it three times now to make it stay.
I myself deleted one of my posts today (only one) because I wanted to reword it. It only shows up in the sidebar when I delete it, not when the coward deletes it.
This post has also been deleted, but I will repeat it three times now to make it stay.
They do wonders for old people with your mental condition, pedo
Get help
Don't need help. When I get deleted, I can get around it.
Don't need help. When I get deleted, I can get around it.
(This was deleted too, but I got around it.)
Don't need help. When I get deleted, I can get around it.
(This was deleted too, but I got around it.)
Don't need help. When I get deleted, I can get around it.
(This was deleted too, but I got around it.)
Don't need help. When I get deleted, I can get around it.
(This was deleted too, but I got around it.)
Don't need help. When I get deleted, I can get around it.
(This was deleted too, but I got around it.)
Don't need help. When I get deleted, I can get around it.
(This was deleted too, but I got around it.)
Don't need help. When I get deleted, I can get around it.
(This was deleted too, but I got around it.)
Don't need help. When I get deleted, I can get around it.
(This was deleted too, but I got around it.)
Don't need help. When I get deleted, I can get around it.
(This was deleted too, but I got around it.)
He's stark raving mad
totally visible to all here
and he can't get around that
In case he doesn't grasp that himself I'm referring to the POS "pastor" boswell
ROFLMFAO !!!
No, everything I said is true. I was repeatedly deleted here today and I myself only deleted one post to reword it, which I did, and I have been able to replace several deleted posts simply by repeating them until they stayed in place.
I am not a coward who has to censor other people. I have too much self respect even to try to do that.
Post a Comment